Exponent DEF 14A 2005
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
2005 NOTICE OF
ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING
AND PROXY STATEMENT
149 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on June 1, 2005
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) of Exponent, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), will be held on Wednesday, June 1, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. local time, at 149 Commonwealth Drive, Menlo Park, California 94025, for the following purposes:
Stockholders owning the Companys shares at the close of business on April 15, 2005 (the Record Date), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
All stockholders of record as of the Record Date are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
Please note that if you hold your shares in street name, that is, through a broker or other nominee, you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the Record Date. Check-in at the registration desk will be required.
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Richard L. Schlenker, Corporate Secretary
Menlo Park, California
May 6, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Exponent, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at the Companys principal executive offices, 149 Commonwealth Drive, Menlo Park, California 94025, on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. local time. The telephone number for this location is (650) 326-9400.
What is the Purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At the Companys Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon matters outlined in the accompanying notice of the meeting and transact such other business that may properly come before the meeting.
Who is Entitled to Vote?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date, April 15, 2005, receive notice of the Annual Meeting and are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each outstanding share entitles its holder to cast one vote on each matter to be voted upon.
Please note that if you hold your shares in street name, that is, through a broker or other nominee, you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership on the Record Date. If you do not vote your proxy, your brokerage firm may either vote your shares on routine matters, such as election of directors and the ratification of the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, or leave your shares without a vote. We encourage you to provide instructions to your brokerage firm by voting your proxy. This ensures your shares will be voted at the meeting.
The proxy solicitation materials will be mailed on or about May 6, 2005, together with the Companys Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2004, to all stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting.
How Do I Vote?
You have four ways to vote. You may return the proxy card by mail, vote by telephone, vote via the internet, or vote in person. To vote by mail, you must sign your proxy card and send it in the enclosed prepaid, addressed envelope. If you mark your voting instructions on the proxy card, your shares will be voted as you instruct. If you return a signed card but do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors:
If you choose to vote by telephone or via the internet, please review the back of the proxy card for instructions on how to do so. You do not need to mail in your proxy card if you vote by telephone or via the internet. Some brokers may not provide telephone or internet voting.
If you choose to vote in person, you will have an opportunity to do so at the Annual Meeting. You may either bring your proxy card to the Annual Meeting, or if you do not bring your proxy card, the Company will pass out written ballots to anyone who was a stockholder as of the Record Date.
What if I Change My Mind After I Return My Proxy Card?
You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by signing another proxy with a later date, voting by telephone or via the internet, or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Your proxy with the latest date is counted.
What Does it Mean if I Receive More than One Proxy Card?
It means you have multiple accounts with the transfer agent and/or with brokers. Please provide voting instructions for all proxy cards you receive.
What Constitutes a Quorum?
The presence, in person or by properly executed proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding as of the Record Date constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Shares that voted For, Against, or Withheld on the proposals are treated as being present at the meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum and are deemed to be votes cast at the Annual Meeting with respect to the proposals. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included for purposes of determining whether a quorum of shares is present at the Annual Meeting. However, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be included in the tabulation of the voting results on the election of directors or on issues requiring approval of a majority of the votes duly cast. Signed, unmarked proxy cards are voted as recommended by the Board of Directors. A plurality of the votes duly cast is required for the election of directors. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes duly cast is required for the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.
As of the Record Date, a total of 7,971,877 shares of the Companys common stock, $.001 par value, were issued and outstanding. For information regarding security ownership by management and by the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Companys common stock, see Stock Ownership. The closing price of the Companys common stock on the NASDAQ National Market on the Record Date was $23.47 per share.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
A Board of seven directors is to be elected at the Annual Meeting. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the Companys seven nominees named below. In the event that any nominee of the Company is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by the present Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. It is not expected that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director. The term of office of each person elected as a director will continue until the next Annual Meeting, or until a successor has been elected and qualified. The Board has determined that at least a majority of the members of the Board are independent directors within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards.
The seven nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes duly cast shall be elected as directors. Votes withheld from any director are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but have no other legal effect under Delaware law.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW:
Samuel H. Armacost
Barbara M. Barrett
Leslie G. Denend, Ph.D.
Michael R. Gaulke
Jon R. Katzenbach
Roger L. McCarthy, Ph.D.
Stephen C. Riggins
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The Board held four regular meetings in 2004. Each director attended at least 75% of all Board meetings during 2004. Committee members attended at least 75% of all applicable committee meetings during 2004, with the exception of Jon Katzenbach who attended 60% of all applicable committee meetings. We encourage members of the Board to attend our annual meetings. All of our Board members attended last years meeting. The table below describes the Boards committees. The members of each committee are all independent directors within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
As described in the table above, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board identifies individuals qualified to become Board members, recommends that the Board select the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders, and oversees the Boards annual evaluation of its performance. The committee is also responsible for developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company and for periodically reviewing such guidelines. The members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are all independent directors within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards. The responsibilities of this committee are set forth in the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, which is available on the Companys website at: http://www.exponent.com/investors/corpgovernance.html.
The information below describes the criteria and process that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee uses to evaluate future candidates to the Board of Directors.
Criteria for Nomination to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the appropriate balance of experience, skills and characteristics required of the Board of Directors, and will seek to insure that at least a majority of the directors are independent under the rules of the NASDAQ National Market, and that members of the Audit Committee meet the financial literacy requirements under the rules of the NASDAQ National Market and at least one of them qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Nominees for director will be recommended to the Board on the basis of the appropriate size, function and needs of the Board, taking into account that the Board as a whole shall have competency in the following areas: (i) industry knowledge; (ii) accounting and finance; (iii) business judgment; (iv) management; (v) leadership; (vi) business strategy; and (vii) corporate governance.
Stockholders Proposals for Nominees. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider written proposals from stockholders for nominees for director. Any such nominations should be submitted to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee c/o the Secretary of the Company and should include (at a minimum) the following information: (a) all information relating to such nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (including such persons written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the name(s) and address(es) of the stockholder(s) making the nomination and the number of shares of the Companys common stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder(s); and (c) appropriate biographical information and a statement as to the qualifications of the nominee, and should be submitted in the time frame described in the Bylaws of the Company and under the caption, Stockholder Proposals for the 2006 Annual Meeting.
Process for Identifying and Evaluating Nominees. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes the Company is well served by its current directors, and in the ordinary course will re-nominate incumbent directors who continue to be qualified for Board Service and are willing to continue as directors. If an incumbent director is not standing for re-election, or if a vacancy on the Board occurs between annual stockholder meetings, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may seek out potential candidates for Board appointment who meet the criteria for selection as a nominee and have the specific qualities or skills being sought. Director candidates will be selected based on input from members of the Board, senior management of the Company and, if the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate each candidates qualifications and check relevant references. In addition, such candidates will be interviewed by at least one member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Candidates meriting serious consideration will meet with all members of the Board. Based on this input, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate which of the prospective candidates is qualified to serve as a director and whether the committee should recommend to the Board that this candidate be appointed to fill a current vacancy on the Board, or presented for approval of the stockholders, as appropriate.
The Company has never received a proposal from a stockholder to nominate a director. Although the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal policy with respect to stockholder nominees, the committee expects that the evaluation process for a stockholder nominee would be similar to the process outlined above.
Board Nominees for the 2005 Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees listed in the proxy statement is a current director standing for re-election.
How to Contact the Board of Directors. Interested parties wishing to contact the non-management directors of the Company may do so by writing to them at the following address: Corporate Secretary, 149 Commonwealth Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025. All letters received will be categorized and processed by the Companys Corporate Secretary, and then forwarded to the Companys non-management directors.
Code of Business Conduct and Corporate Governance
The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of the Companys employees, officers and members of the Board of Directors. The Company has also adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its senior financial officers, including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. Copies of both documents are available on the Companys website at: http://www.exponent.com/investors/corpgovernance.html. The Company intends to disclose any waivers from these codes in a report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
Compensation of Directors
Members of the Board of Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for their services as directors of the Company.
Non-employee members of the Board of Directors receive:
Furthermore, during 2004 Mr. Keith received an additional retainer of $5,000 for his duties associated with serving as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Riggins received an additional retainer of $7,500 for his duties associated with serving as chairperson of the Audit Committee and Ms. Barrett and Dr. Denend received an additional $3,000 each for their duties as chairpersons of the Human Resources Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, respectively. Non-employee Board members were reimbursed for certain expenses related to travel and incidentals.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The following Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors does not constitute soliciting material and should not be considered filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for general oversight of the Companys financial accounting and reporting process. The committees primary responsibilities fall into three broad categories:
The committees responsibilities are presented in detail in the complete charter of the committee. The charter reflects standards set forth in the applicable SEC regulations and the NASDAQ National Market rules. Audit Committee members are independent as defined by these regulations and rules. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Riggins is an audit committee financial expert as such term is defined by these rules and regulations.
The committee has implemented procedures to ensure that during the course of each fiscal year it devotes the attention it considers necessary or appropriate to each of the matters assigned to it under the committees charter. To carry out its responsibilities, the committee met nine times during fiscal 2004.
In overseeing the preparation of the Companys financial statements, the committee met with both management and the Companys independent registered public accounting firm to review and discuss all financial statements prior to their issuance and to discuss significant accounting issues. Management advised the committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the committee discussed the statements with both management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The committees review included discussion with the independent registered public accounting firm of matters required to be discussed pursuant to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication With Audit Committees), which includes:
With respect to the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, the committee, among other things, discussed with KPMG LLP matters relating to its independence, including the disclosures made to the committee as required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees).
On the basis of these reviews and discussions, the committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Board approve the inclusion of the Companys audited financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, for filing with the SEC.
Members of the Audit Committee
Stephen C. Riggins, Chairperson
Samuel H. Armacost
Leslie G. Denend, Ph.D.
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
KPMG LLP has been the independent registered public accounting firm that audits the financial statements of the Company since 1987. In accordance with standing policy, KPMG periodically changes the personnel who work on the audit. In addition to performing the audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements, KPMG LLP provided various other services during 2004. The aggregate fees billed during 2004 and 2003 for each of the following categories of services are set forth below:
Audit Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports. This includes fees for review of the tax provision and fees for accounting consultations on matters reflected in the financial statements. Audit fees also include audit or other attest services required by statute or regulation (foreign or domestic) such as comfort letters, consents, reviews of SEC filings, statutory audits in non-U.S. locations and reports on issuers internal controls required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Audit-Related Fees. Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Companys consolidated financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees. These services include employee benefit plan audits, due diligence assistance, accounting consultation on proposed transactions, internal control reviews and audit or attest services not required by statute or regulation.
Tax Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, tax audit defense, customs and duties, mergers and acquisitions, and international tax planning.
All Other Fees. Consists of fees for products and services other than the services reported above.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year ending December 30, 2005. KPMG LLP has audited the Companys financial statements since 1987. A representative of KPMG LLP is expected to be present at the meeting and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP will require the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.
In the event that the stockholders do not approve the selection of KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will reconsider the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.
How Much Stock do the Companys Directors, Executive Officers and Greater than 5% Stockholders Own?
The following table indicates beneficial ownership of the Companys common stock as of April 15, 2005. It includes stockholders known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the Companys common stock, the Companys directors, the executive officers of the Company named in the Executive Compensation Table (see page 16), and the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. A total of 7,971,877 shares of the Companys common stock were issued and outstanding as of April 15, 2005.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
The Company believes that during 2004, all filings with the SEC, by its officers, directors and 10% stockholders complied with requirements for reporting ownership or changes in ownership of Company common stock pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except for a failure to file a Form 5, Annual Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership, on a timely basis for Roger L. McCarthy with regards to a donation of Company stock which took place in 2001. The Form 5 for this transaction was filed on April 26, 2005.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2004, Ms. Barrett and Messrs. Armacost, Denend, Katzenbach, Keith, and Riggins served as members of the Human Resources Committee. No member of the Human Resources Committee is or was formerly an officer or an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
No interlocking relationship exists between the Companys Board of Directors or Human Resources Committee and the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of any other company, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past.
Executive Compensation Table
The following table shows compensation paid for services to the Company in all capacities for the fiscal years indicated for the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other four most highly compensated executive officers (the Named Officers):
What Options were Granted to the Named Officers in 2004?
The following table offers information concerning stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2004, to the Named Officers.
What is the Value of the Options held by the Named Officers?
The following table shows information concerning the shares exercised and the number of shares exercisable and unexercisable as of December 31, 2004. Also reported are values for in-the-money options that represent the positive spread between the respective exercise prices of outstanding stock options and the fair market value of the Companys common stock as of December 31, 2004.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain information regarding securities authorized for issuance under the Companys equity compensation plans during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. The equity compensation plans of the Company include the 1999 Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan.
The 1999 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan were approved by the Companys stockholders. The 1998 Stock Option Plan was not approved by the Companys stockholders.
The Board of Directors adopted the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the 1998 Plan) in October 1998. The 1998 Plan is a non-statutory plan, which will expire in 2008. Under the 1998 Plan, awards may be granted to any employee of the Company who is not an officer or director of the Company at the time of the award. The 1998 Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified options, exercisable at a price not less than 85% of the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. Options are granted for terms of up to ten years and generally vest ratably over a four-year period from the grant date.
REPORT OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors establishes the general compensation policies for all employees and oversees the specific compensation plans for officers of the Company, including the President and CEO. The Committee is composed of the six non-employee directors. No executive officers of the Company are included on the Human Resources Committee.
What is the Companys Philosophy of Executive Compensation?
The Companys compensation program for executives consists of three elements:
Compensation of the Companys officers, including the President and CEO, is based on the profitability of the Company, the individual achievements of the officer and the competitive environment. Individual performance assessments are based on both objective and subjective appraisals of financial performance, professional accomplishments and leadership that meet the level of excellence demanded by the Company.
What is the Companys Process for Determining Executive Compensation?
The responsibility for determining the compensation of the Companys Executive Officers has been delegated by the Board of Directors to the Human Resources Committee. Executive Officers prepare a written assessment of their performance on an annual basis. The Human Resources Committee reviews the written assessment and discusses the performance of the President and CEO, Michael R. Gaulke; the Chairman, Roger L. McCarthy, Ph.D.; and the Chief Technical Officer, Subbaiah V. Malladi, Ph.D. in executive session. In evaluating each individual the committee considers that individuals performance as well as the performance of the Company. The results of this evaluation are discussed with each Executive Officer and are the basis for determining compensation.
For the other Executive Officers, the President and CEO reviews the written assessments and evaluates their performance. The President and CEO presents his evaluation and compensation recommendations to the Human Resources Committee for review and approval. The Human Resources Committee approves the compensation for all Executive Officers.
What is the Timing of Compensation Changes?
Performance reviews of officers and employees are typically completed within three months after the close of each year. Hence, compensation changes for 2005 were based on 2004 results. These compensation changes went into effect March 26, 2005. Bonuses based on 2004 performance were paid on March 11, 2005.
What was the Human Resources Committees Basis for the CEOs Compensation in fiscal 2004?
Significant factors in establishing Mr. Gaulkes compensation were the profitability of the Company, his leadership and the competitive environment. The factors discussed below in Salaries, Bonuses, and Stock Options and Restricted Stock Unit Awards were applied in establishing Mr. Gaulkes salary, bonus, stock option grants, and restricted stock unit grants.
Mr. Gaulke had a base salary of $524,992 during fiscal 2004, the same as fiscal 2003. His 2004 base salary did not increase as the Company believes a substantial portion of the CEOs compensation should be in the form of an incentive bonus. Mr. Gaulkes bonus for fiscal 2004 was $500,000 of which 30%, or $150,000, was settled with a vested stock unit award. Under this vested stock unit award Mr. Gaulke has the right to receive 6,316 shares of common stock on March 11, 2009.
Mr. Gaulkes long-term incentive compensation for 2004 included the grant of an option on February 4, 2004, to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at $22.735 per share. This option vests ratably over a four-year period. Mr. Gaulke was also granted a restricted stock unit award under which he will receive 7,913 shares of common stock on March 12, 2008, provided certain employment conditions are met. This award was valued at $180,000.
What is the Basis for Determining Executive Compensation?
Salaries. The Company strives to provide base salaries commensurate with comparable executives and private consultants. In consideration of their responsibilities for both managing the Company and/or providing direct consulting services which generate significant Company revenue, the Human Resources Committee believes the officers salaries are comparable with those earned by executives and consultants of similar background, capability and technical expertise.
Bonuses. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the bonus plan was continued for all employees, including officers. The Company has a bonus pool equal to 33% of pre-tax income before bonuses. Up to 30% of each officers bonus for the year ended December 31, 2004 was settled in vested stock unit awards. Under these awards each officer has the right to receive shares of the Companys common stock four years from the date of grant. Mr. Gaulke, President and CEO, recommends individual officer bonuses based on the officers financial performance, professional accomplishments and leadership. The Human Resources Committee reviews and approves the bonuses for each officer and the bonus pool. Additionally, they determine the bonuses for all inside directors, including the President and CEO, the Chairman, and the Chief Technical Officer of the Company.
Stock Options and Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The Human Resources Committee believes that stock ownership programs reward officers for maximizing stockholder value and encourage retention of key employees. Fiscal 2004 options were granted at the market price on the date of grant and vest over a four-year period. For the year ended December 31, 2004, up to 30% of each officers bonus was settled in vested stock unit awards. An equal number of restricted stock unit awards were granted to each officer on March 10, 2005. These restricted stock unit awards vest on March 11, 2009.
Executive Compensation. The Human Resources Committee reviewed the performance of the President and CEO, Michael R. Gaulke; the Chairman, Roger L. McCarthy, Ph.D.; and the CTO, Subbaiah V. Malladi, Ph.D., during 2004. In addition, the Human Resources Committee reviewed and approved the 2004 salary recommendations for all other officers.
How is the Company Addressing Internal Revenue Code Limits on Deductibility of Compensation?
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the corporations Chief Executive Officer and four most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of any fiscal year. However, the statute exempts qualifying performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The Companys 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan enables compensation recognized in connection with the exercise of options to qualify as an exception to the deduction limit. The Committee will continue to evaluate the issues relating to executive compensation and will take appropriate action where necessary. The Committees policy is to qualify its executive compensation for deductibility under applicable tax laws, where possible.
Members of the Human Resources Committee
Barbara M. Barrett, Chairperson
Samuel H. Armacost
Leslie G. Denend, Ph.D.
Jon R. Katzenbach
Edward J. Keith
Stephen C. Riggins
COMPANY STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The graph compares the Company cumulative total stockholder return calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis from 1999 through 2004 with those of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on the last day of 1999. Note that the historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
The Company knows of no other matters that will be brought before the meeting. However, if any such matters are properly presented before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card to vote the shares they represent as the Board of Directors may recommend. It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. You are therefore urged to execute and return, vote by phone, or vote via the internet at your earliest convenience your proxy results.
Stockholder Proposals for the 2006 Annual Meeting. Stockholders are entitled to present proposals for action at a forthcoming meeting if they comply with the requirements of the proxy rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Stockholders interested in presenting a proposal for consideration at the Companys Annual Meeting of stockholders for the year 2006 may do so by submitting the proposals to the Companys Corporate Secretary, no later than January 3, 2006.
Proxy Solicitation Costs. The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. The Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies may be solicited by certain Company directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, by personal conversation, telephone, telegram, letter, electronically, or by facsimile.
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Richard L. Schlenker, Corporate Secretary
Menlo Park, California
May 6, 2005
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSALS.
SEE REVERSE SIDE
ITEM 1. ELECTION OF
ITEM 2. TO RATIFY THE
APPOINTMENT OF KPMG
LLP AS INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR
THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 30, 2005.
ITEM 3. TO TRANSACT SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY
PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL
MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.
01Samuel H. Armacost
02Barbara M. Barrett
03Leslie G. Denend, Ph.D.
04Michael R. Gaulke
05Jon R. Katzenbach
06Roger L. McCarthy, Ph.D.
07Stephen C. Riggins
Withheld for the nominees you list below: (Write that nominees
name in the space provided below.)
NOTE: Please sign as name appears heron. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
Use the internet to vote your proxy.
Have your proxy card in hand
when you access the web site.
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote
your proxy. Have your proxy card in
hand when you call.
Mark, sign and date
your proxy card and
return it in the
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement
on the internet at www.exponent.com
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The undersigned stockholder of Exponent, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated May 6, 2005, and hereby appoints Michael R. Gaulke, Roger L. McCarthy, Ph.D. and Richard L. Schlenker and any of them, each with power of substitution and revocation, proxies and attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned to represent the undersigned and vote all shares of Common Stock of the Company which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 149 Commonwealth Drive, Menlo Park, California 94025, at 9:30 a.m., local time, on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 and at any adjournment thereof, upon the following matters.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
You can now access your Exponent, Inc. account online.
Access your Exponent, Inc. shareholder/stockholder account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD). Mellon Investor Services LLC, Transfer Agent for Exponent, Inc., now makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your shareholder account.
View account status
View certificate history
View book-entry information
View payment history for dividends
Make address changes
Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form
Establish/change your PIN
Visit us on the web at http://www.melloninvestor.com
For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm
Monday-Friday Eastern Time
Investor ServiceDirect® is a registered trademark of Mellon Investor Services LLC