Annual Reports

 
Quarterly Reports

 
8-K

 
Other

  • SC 13G (Feb 9, 2018)
  • Form 4 (Feb 1, 2018)
  • SC 13G (Jan 29, 2018)
  • Form 4 (Dec 20, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Dec 5, 2017)
  • S-8 (Dec 1, 2017)
Extreme Networks DEF 14A 2016
Definitive Proxy Statement
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrant  x                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨   Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x   Definitive Proxy Statement
¨   Definitive Additional Materials
¨   Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12.
Extreme Networks, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x   No fee required
¨   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14-a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
  (1)  

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

   

 

  (2)  

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

   

 

  (3)  

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

   

 

  (4)  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

   

 

  (5)   Total fee paid:
   
   

 

¨   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  (1)  

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

   

 

  (2)  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

   

 

  (3)  

Filing Party:

 

 


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

October 5, 2016

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are cordially invited to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Extreme Networks, Inc. to be held on Friday, November 18, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time at our corporate headquarters located at 145 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134.

 

Details of business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting are described in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. Accompanying this Proxy Statement is the Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders.

 

We are pleased to take advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to stockholders over the Internet. We believe these rules allow us to provide our stockholders with the information they need, while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. On or about October 5, 2016, you were provided with a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) and provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. The Notice also provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

 

Whether or not you plan to attend our Annual Meeting, you can ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly voting and submitting your proxy by telephone, by Internet or, if you have received a paper copy of your proxy materials by mail, by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the envelope provided.

 

If you have any further questions concerning the Annual Meeting or any of the proposals, please contact our Investor Relations department at (408) 579-3483. We look forward to your attendance at the Annual Meeting.

 

Yours Truly,

LOGO

Edward B. Meyercord

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy by telephone, the Internet or by mail in order to ensure the presence of a quorum. If you attend the meeting and do not hold your shares through an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, you will have the right to revoke the proxy and vote your shares in person. If you hold your shares through an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from them to vote your shares and revoke your vote, if necessary.


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

To Be Held November 18, 2016

 

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:

 

Notice is hereby given that the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Extreme Networks, Inc. will be held on Friday, November 18, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time at our corporate headquarters located at 145 Rio Robles, San Jose, California, 95134 in order to:

 

  1. Elect seven directors to the Board of Directors for a one-year term;

 

  2. Hold an advisory vote on our named executive officers’ compensation;

 

  3. Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditors for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2017;

 

  4. Ratify Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, which extends that agreement through May 31, 2017;

 

  5. Approve the Amendment and Restatement of the Extreme Networks, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan; and

 

  6. Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the nominees in Item 1 and “FOR” Items 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Stockholders of record at the close of business on September 23, 2016 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, this meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Commencing ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of stockholders entitled to attend and vote at the meeting will be available for review by any stockholder during normal business hours at our headquarters located at 145 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

 

LOGO

Katayoun (“Katy”) Motiey

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer- HR, Legal, & Corporate Secretary

 

San Jose, California

October 5, 2016

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT: Please vote your shares via telephone or the Internet, as described in the accompanying materials, to assure that your shares are represented at the meeting, or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, you may mark, sign and date the proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you attend the meeting, you may choose to vote in person even if you have previously voted your shares.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2016: This Proxy Statement and the financial and other information concerning Extreme Networks contained in our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 are available on the Internet and may be viewed at www.proxyvote.com, where you may also cast your vote.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TO THE PROXY STATEMENT

 

INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING

     1   

General

     1   

Who May Vote, Record Date, Admission to Meeting

     1   

Broker Non-Votes

     1   

Quorum

     2   

“Notice and Access” Model

     2   

Vote Required to Adopt Proposals

     2   

Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

     2   

Voting Instructions

     3   

Solicitation of Proxies

     3   

Voting Results

     3   

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     4   

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

     4   

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     5   

Nominees for Election at 2016 Annual Meeting

     5   

Arrangements Regarding Appointment of Directors

     8   

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     8   

Board and Leadership Structure

     8   

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

     9   

Meetings of the Board of Directors

     9   

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

     9   

Executive Sessions

     9   

Committees of the Board of Directors

     10   

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

     12   

Director Nominations

     12   

Communications with Directors

     13   

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

     14   

Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Materials

     14   

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

     14   

PROPOSAL TWO: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     17   

Background

     17   

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

     17   

PROPOSAL THREE: RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2017

     18   

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

     18   

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

     18   

PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFY AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE COMPANY’S AMENDED AND RESTATED RIGHTS AGREEMENT TO EXTEND THE AGREEMENT UNTIL MAY 31, 2017

     20   

Background

     20   

Anti-Takeover Effects

     24   

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

     24   

PROPOSAL FIVE: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE EXTREME NETWORKS, INC. 2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

     25   

Overview

     25   

 

i


Table of Contents

Proposed Amendments to the Current Equity Plan

     26   

Why the Company Stockholders Should Vote for the Amended Company Stock Plan

     26   

Summary Description of the Amended Equity Plan

     31   

Required Vote and Board of Directors Recommendation

     40   

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     41   

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS

     43   

Executive Officers

     43   

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

     44   

Summary Compensation Table

     56   

Summary of Employment and Other Agreements

     57   

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

     62   

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

     64   

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Last Fiscal Year

     65   

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

     65   

Estimated Payments Upon Termination Without Cause or Upon Change in Control

     65   

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     67   

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

     68   

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

     69   

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

     70   

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED AT NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

     71   

TRANSACTION OF OTHER BUSINESS

     71   

DELIVERY TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME LAST NAME AND ADDRESS

     71   

COMMUNICATING WITH EXTREME NETWORKS

     72   

 

ii


Table of Contents

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

 

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

 

INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING

 

General

 

Our Board of Directors, or our Board, is soliciting your proxy for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Friday, November 18, 2016, or at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This proxy statement and related materials are first being made available to stockholders on or about October 5, 2016. References in this proxy statement to the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and “Extreme Networks” are to Extreme Networks, Inc., and references to the “Annual Meeting” are to the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. When we refer to the Company’s fiscal year, we mean the annual period ending on June 30. This proxy statement covers our 2016 fiscal year, which was from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016 (“fiscal 2016”).

 

Who May Vote, Record Date, Admission to Meeting

 

Only holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on September 23, 2016 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment thereof. As of the Record Date, 106,776,097 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. You are entitled to one vote for each share you hold.

 

You are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner of our common stock as of the Record Date, or if you hold a valid legal proxy for the Annual Meeting. To request a legal proxy, please follow the instructions at www.proxyvote.com or request a paper copy of the materials, which will contain the appropriate instructions.

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, for admission to the Annual Meeting.

 

If your shares are registered in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, you may be asked to provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date, such as a brokerage account statement or voting instruction form provided by your record holder, or other similar evidence of ownership, as well as picture identification, for admission. If you wish to be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it to the inspector of elections together with your ballot at the Annual Meeting.

 

If you do not provide picture identification and comply with the other procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the Annual Meeting. We recommend that you arrive early to ensure that you are seated by the commencement of the Annual Meeting.

 

Broker Non-Votes

 

A broker non-vote occurs when a broker submits a proxy card with respect to shares held in a fiduciary capacity (typically referred to as being held in “street name”), but cannot vote on a particular matter because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Under the rules that govern brokers who are voting with respect to such shares, brokers have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. Routine matters include the ratification of selection of auditors and approval of pro rata stock splits. Non-routine matters include the election of directors and amendments to or the adoption of stock plans.

 

1


Table of Contents

Quorum

 

Our bylaws provide that a majority of the shares of our common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting as of the Record Date must be represented at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting, except to the extent that the presence of a larger number may be required by law. Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy, if your broker, banker or other nominee submits a proxy on your behalf, or if you vote in person at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

 

“Notice and Access” Model

 

The SEC’s proxy rules set forth how companies must provide proxy materials. These rules are often referred to as “notice and access.” Under the notice and access model, a company may select either of the following options for making proxy materials available to stockholders: (i) the full set delivery option; or (ii) the notice only option. A company may use a single method for all its stockholders, or use the full set delivery option for some stockholders and the notice only option for others.

 

Under the full set delivery option a company delivers all proxy materials to its stockholders by mail or, if a stockholder has previously agreed, electronically. In addition to delivering proxy materials to stockholders, the company must post all proxy materials on a publicly-accessible web site (other than the SEC’s web site) and provide information to stockholders about how to access that web site and the hosted materials. Under the notice only option, instead of delivering its proxy materials to stockholders, the company delivers a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” that outlines (i) information regarding the date and time of the meeting of stockholders, as well as the items to be considered at the meeting; (ii) information regarding the web site where the proxy materials are posted; and (iii) various means by which a stockholder can request printed or emailed copies of the proxy materials.

 

In connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting, we have elected to use the notice only option. Accordingly, you should have received a notice by mail, unless you requested a full set of materials from prior mailings, instructing you how to access proxy materials at www.proxyvote.com and providing you with a control number you can use to vote your shares. You may request that the Company also deliver to you printed or emailed copies of the proxy materials.

 

All shares represented by a valid proxy, timely submitted to the Company, will be voted. Where a proxy specifies a stockholder’s choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the shares will be voted in accordance with that specification. If no choice is indicated on the proxy, the shares will be voted in favor of the proposal. If your shares are registered under your own name, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting by (i) delivering to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s headquarters either a written instrument revoking the proxy or a duly executed proxy with a later date, or (ii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. If you hold shares in street name, through a broker, bank or other nominee, you must contact the broker, bank or other nominee to revoke your proxy.

 

Vote Required to Adopt Proposals

 

The holder of each share of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the Record Date is entitled to one vote on each of the director nominees and one vote on each other matter. The director nominees who receive the highest number of “For” votes will be elected as directors. All other matters shall be determined by a majority of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively on the matter.

 

Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

 

Shares not present at the meeting, shares that abstain from voting and shares voted “Withhold” will have no effect on the election of directors. For each of the other proposals, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote

 

2


Table of Contents

against the proposal. If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares in “street name,” it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors and with respect to the other proposals included in this proxy. The rules governing brokers, banks and other nominees who are voting with respect to shares held in street name provide such nominees the discretion to vote on routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. Routine matters to be addressed at the Annual Meeting include the ratification of auditors. Non-routine matters include the election of directors, the advisory votes on the extension of the term of our rights plan and on our executive compensation, and the approval of the amendment and restatement of our equity plan. Banks and brokers may not vote on these non-routine matters if you do not provide specific voting instructions. Accordingly, we encourage you to vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

 

Voting Instructions

 

If you complete and submit your proxy card or the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or other nominee, the persons named as proxies will follow your instructions. If you do not direct how to vote on a proposal, the persons named as proxies will vote as the Board recommends on that proposal. Depending on how you hold your shares, you may vote in one of the following ways:

 

Stockholders of Record:    You may vote by proxy, over the Internet or by telephone. Please follow the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on the proxy card you received. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

 

Beneficial Stockholders:    Your broker, bank or other nominee will provide you with a voting instruction card for your use in instructing it how to vote your shares. Since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee, or by requesting one on www.proxyvote.com.

 

Votes submitted by telephone or via the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on November 17, 2016. Submitting your proxy by telephone or via the Internet will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close by returning a later-dated proxy card, by voting again by Internet or telephone as more fully detailed on your proxy card, or by delivering written instructions to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s headquarters before the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously voted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically request revocation or vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee in accordance with the nominees directions, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

 

Solicitation of Proxies

 

We will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to soliciting stockholders by mail, we will request banks, brokers and other intermediaries holding shares of our common stock beneficially owned by others to obtain proxies from the beneficial owners and will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses in so doing. We may use the services of our officers, directors and other employees to solicit proxies, personally or by telephone, without additional compensation. The Company has engaged Okapi Partners to assist in the solicitation of proxies and provide related advice and informational support for a services fee and the reimbursement of customary disbursements that are not expected to exceed $13,000 in the aggregate.

 

Voting Results

 

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will report final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of the Annual Meeting.

 

3


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL ONE:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

The terms of our current directors expire upon the election and qualification of the directors to be elected at the 2016 Annual Meeting. The Board has nominated seven persons for election at the Annual Meeting to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Our Board’s nominees for election at the 2016 Annual Meeting are Edward B. Meyercord, John H. Kispert, Charles Carinalli, Kathleen M. Holmgren, Raj Khanna, Edward H. Kennedy, and John C. Shoemaker, all of whom are presently directors of Extreme Networks.

 

Please see below under the heading “Board of Directors” for information concerning the nominees. If elected, each nominee will serve as a director until the Annual Meeting of stockholders in 2017 and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.

 

Each nominee has indicated to us that he or she will serve if elected. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any nominee who is unable or who will decline to serve as a director. However, if a nominee declines to serve or becomes unavailable for any reason, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or our Board.

 

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

 

The persons receiving the highest number of votes represented by outstanding shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting will be elected to the Board, provided a quorum is present. Votes “For”, votes to “Withhold” authority and “Broker Non-Votes” will each be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election. If you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions as to the election of any director, your shares will be voted in favor of the nominees recommended by our Board.

 

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

 

4


Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The following table provides biographical information for each nominee to our Board of Directors.

 

Name

   Age      Director
Since
 

Edward B. Meyercord, Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer

     51         2009   

John H. Kispert, Chairman of the Board of Directors

     53         2009   

Charles P. Carinalli, Director

     68         1996   

Kathleen M. Holmgren, Director

     58         2015   

Raj Khanna, Director

     70         2014   

Edward H. Kennedy, Director

     62         2011   

John C. Shoemaker, Director

     74         2007   

 

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

The biography of each of our director nominees below contains information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, other director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board to determine that the person should serve as a director.

 

Nominees for Election at 2016 Annual Meeting

 

Edward B. Meyercord.    Mr. Meyercord has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2015. Mr. Meyercord joined our Board of Directors as an independent director in October 2009 and served as Chairman from March 2011 until August 2015. Prior to assuming his operating role at Extreme Networks in April 2015, Mr. Meyercord was Chief Executive Officer and Director at Critical Alert Systems, LLC, a privately held software-driven, healthcare information technology company that he co-founded in July 2010 and where he continues to serve on the board of directors. Prior to that, Mr. Meyercord served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Cavalier Telephone, LLC, a privately held voice, video and data services company, from 2006 to 2009. He served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Talk America Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded company that provided phone and internet services to consumers and small businesses throughout the United States, from 1996 to 2006. Earlier in his career, Mr. Meyercord served as a Vice President in the investment banking division of Salomon Brothers Inc. (now part of Citigroup, Inc.), a Wall Street investment bank, from 1993 to 1996. He also served on the board of Tollgrade Communications, Inc., a then publicly traded telecommunications company, from August 2009 to May 2011. Mr. Meyercord holds a B.A. in economics from Trinity College in Hartford, CT, and a M.B.A. from the Stern School of Business at New York University.

 

Mr. Meyercord brings to the Board his extensive executive experience in corporate finance, risk assessment and management. His background in the telecommunications industry provides our Board with valuable industry expertise in one of our key markets. Also, the Board believes it is valuable to have the Company’s Chief Executive Officer serve on the board to bring in-depth perspective on the Company’s current operations, strategy, financial condition and competitive position.

 

John H. Kispert.    Mr. Kispert has served as our Chairman of the Board since August 2015 and has served as one of our directors since May 2009. Currently, he is a Managing Partner at Black Diamond Ventures, which he joined in March 2016. Mr. Kispert previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Spansion, Inc., a publicly traded provider of flash memory products, from February 2009 until March 2015, when Spansion merged with Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, a publicly traded semiconductor company. Spansion filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in March 2009 and emerged from

 

5


Table of Contents

bankruptcy in May of 2010, during Mr. Kispert’s tenure. From 1995 to January 2009, Mr. Kispert held various executive management positions at KLA-Tencor Corporation, a publicly traded capital equipment company, including President and Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Vice President, Finance and Accounting. Prior to KLA-Tencor, Mr. Kispert served in a number of positions with IBM Corporation, a publicly traded information technology company, from 1989 to 1995. Mr. Kispert currently serves on the boards of Gigamon Inc., a publicly traded network visibility solutions provider, where he has served since December 2013; TriNet Group, Inc., a publicly traded cloud-based HR solutions provider, where he has served since May 2014 and serves on the compensation committee; and Barracuda Networks, Inc., a publicly traded provider of cloud-enabled security and data protection solutions, where he has served since August 2016 and serves on the audit committee. Mr. Kispert served on the board of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation from March 2015 to May 2016, and on the board of Spansion, Inc. from February 2009 to March 2015, prior to its merger with Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. Mr. Kispert is on the Board of Trustees of Grinnell College. Mr. Kispert holds a B.A. in political science from Grinnell College and a M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles

 

Mr. Kispert brings to the Board his extensive management and leadership experience, and provides our Board with technology, leadership and financial expertise that aids our Board in understanding corporate needs and strategic opportunities.

 

Charles P. Carinalli.    Mr. Carinalli has served as one of our directors since October 1996. Mr. Carinalli has been a Principal of Carinalli Ventures since January 2002. From 1999 to May 2002, Mr. Carinalli was Chief Executive Officer and a director of Adaptive Silicon, Inc., a privately held developer of semiconductor products. From November 2000 to November 2001, Mr. Carinalli served as Chairman of Clearwater Communications, Inc., a privately held telecommunications company. From December 1996 to July 1999, Mr. Carinalli served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of WaveSpan Corporation, a developer of wireless broadband access systems until the company was acquired by Proxim, Inc., a broadband wireless networking systems company. From 1970 to 1996, Mr. Carinalli served in various positions at National Semiconductor Corporation, a publicly traded semiconductor company that developed and sold analog-based semiconductor and integrated communication products, most recently serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer. Mr. Carinalli has served on the board of directors of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., a publicly traded semiconductor company, since February 2002 and has served as a member of its nominating and governance and compensation committees, since 2005. He also is a member of the board of directors of various privately held companies. Mr. Carinalli formerly served on the board of directors of Atmel Corporation, a publicly traded semiconductor company, from February 2008 until its acquisition by Microchip Technology Incorporated, a publicly traded semiconductor company, in April 2016. Mr. Carinalli holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in electrical engineering from Santa Clara University.

 

Mr. Carinalli brings to the Board extensive engineering and engineering management expertise, as well as general management expertise and technology expertise, which aids our Board in understanding product development, engineering management and strategic planning, as well as risk assessment and planning.

 

Kathleen M. Holmgren.    Ms. Holmgren has served as one of our directors since November 2015. Ms. Holmgren currently serves on the Board of Directors and as the Chief Officer, Future Workforce at Automation Anywhere, Inc., a privately held developer of robotic process automation and testing software, which she joined as Chief Operating Officer in 2013. Since 2008, Ms. Holmgren has served as a Principal at Sage Advice Partners, a management consulting firm specializing in the high-tech and green-tech markets, and, since October 2009, she has served as a director at the Alliance of Chief Executives, LLC, an organization for chief executives. Ms. Holmgren served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Mendocino Software, a privately held enterprise-class application data developer, from November 2007 to March 2008. Prior to November 2007, Ms. Holmgren spent over 20 years at Sun Microsystems, Inc., a publicly held enterprise software company acquired by Oracle Corporation in 2010, where she held increasingly senior roles, culminating in Senior Vice President, Storage Systems. Ms. Holmgren is a member of the board of Group Delphi, a private

 

6


Table of Contents

design and media production company, where she has served since July 2014. Ms. Holmgren holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from California Polytechnic State University, where she is a member of the Dean’s Advisory Board, and a M.B.A from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

 

Ms. Holmgren brings to the Board her knowledge and expertise in executive leadership in the storage, computer systems, enterprise software and management consulting industries, and provides expertise in operations, strategic planning and risk assessment and planning.

 

Edward H. Kennedy.    Mr. Kennedy has served as one of our directors since April 2011. Since June 2010, Mr. Kennedy has served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Tollgrade Communications, Inc., a publicly traded company subsequently acquired by private equity in April 2011. Mr. Kennedy previously served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Rivulet Communications, Inc., a medical video networking company, from 2007 until it was acquired by NDS Surgical Imaging, LLC, a medical imaging and informatics systems company, in 2010. He also previously served as President of Tellabs North American Operations, an optical network technology company, and as Executive Vice President of Tellabs, Inc. from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Kennedy co-founded Ocular Networks, Inc., a provider of optical networking technologies, in 1999 and served as its Chief Executive Officer and President until it was sold to Tellabs, Inc. in 2002. He has also held various executive positions at several telecommunications equipment companies, including Alcatel-Lucent S.A. (previously Alcatel Data Network), a publicly traded French global telecommunications equipment company, and Newbridge Networks Corporation, a then publicly traded Canadian digital networking equipment company. Mr. Kennedy was also a Venture Partner at Columbia Capital, a private equity investment firm, from 2005 to 2007, where he advised regarding investments into new and existing portfolio companies. He previously served as a director of Visual Networks, Inc., a publicly traded network and performance management solutions provider, from 2002 until it was acquired by Fluke Electronic Corporation, an electronic test tools and software company, in 2006. He currently serves of the board of directors of Avizia, Inc. and Gridwise Alliance, Inc., each of which is privately held, as well on the Board of Trustees of Flint Hill School and as an Executive Parent Board of Villanova University. Mr. Kennedy holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

 

Mr. Kennedy brings to the Board his extensive financial and executive leadership experience in technology companies, including networking companies, and provides management and financial expertise to our Board.

 

Raj Khanna.    Mr. Khanna has served as one of our directors since December 2014. Since 2012, Mr. Khanna has served as an independent consultant, assisting companies with finance and internal audit issues. From 2004 to 2011, Mr. Khanna served as Vice President of Corporate Audit at Qualcomm, Inc., a publicly traded semiconductor company. Prior to Qualcomm, Mr. Khanna held various finance roles at Sun Microsystems, Inc., from 1991 to 2004, including International Controller, Vice President Finance for Global Services Business and Senior Director of Finance for Strategic Business Units, and at Xerox Corporation, a provider of document management technology and services, from 1974 to 1991. Mr. Khanna holds a B. Tech in mechanical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology and a M.B.A. from the University of Rochester, New York.

 

Mr. Khanna brings to the Board his extensive experience leading finance and internal audit teams, including the establishment of financial controls and processes, delivering financial investment and M&A guidance, and providing strategic advice and direction regarding business model changes.

 

John C. Shoemaker.    Mr. Shoemaker has served as one of our directors since October 2007. He currently serves as a consultant to the high technology industry and also serves as a mentor to corporate executives. From 1990 to June 2004, Mr. Shoemaker held various executive management positions at Sun Microsystems, Inc., including serving as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations Organizations and as Executive Vice President, and General Manager for its Computer Systems Division. Mr. Shoemaker previously served in a

 

7


Table of Contents

number of senior executive positions with the Xerox Corporation, a provider of document management technology and services, including as Senior Vice President, World Wide Marketing. Mr. Shoemaker served as a director of Altera Corporation, a publicly traded provider of programmable logic solutions, from 2007 until it was acquired by Intel Corporation, a publicly traded semiconductor company, in December 2015. Mr. Shoemaker holds a B.A. in political science and business administration from Hanover College, where he currently is on the Board of Trustees, and a M.B.A. from Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business, where he is a member of the School of Business Dean’s Advisory Council, the IT Advisory Council, and the Johnson Center for Entrepreneurship Board.

 

Mr. Shoemaker brings to the Board his extensive executive experience in senior level management positions in the technology industry, particularly in hardware systems, and provides strong operational, management and financial expertise to our Board.

 

Arrangements Regarding Appointment of Directors

 

None of our directors are appointed pursuant to any arrangement with the Company. Pursuant to the offer letter between the Company and Mr. Meyercord respecting his employment, Mr. Meyercord must immediately resign as a director of the Board when his employment with the Company terminates.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Our Board currently consists of seven directors. Our Board has reviewed the criteria for determining the independence of the Company’s directors under NASDAQ Rule 5605, Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. It has affirmatively determined that, other than Mr. Meyercord, each member of our Board is independent under such criteria. The Board has determined that as of the date of this Proxy Statement the Board is comprised of a majority of directors who qualify under the rules adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ, as supplemented by the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

 

Directors to be elected at the 2016 Annual Meeting are to hold office until the 2017 Annual Meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified.

 

Board and Leadership Structure

 

Our current leadership structure separates the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of our Board. Mr. Kispert has served as the Independent Chairman of our Board since August 2015, replacing Mr. Meyercord who was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer in April 2015. While our bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines do not require that the Chairman of our Board and Chief Executive Officer positions be separate, our Board believes that separating these positions is the appropriate leadership structure for us at this time and results in an effective balancing of responsibilities, experience and independent perspective to meet the current corporate governance needs and oversight responsibilities of our Board. Separating these positions allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on setting our strategic direction and overseeing our day-to-day leadership and performance, while allowing the Chairman of our Board to lead our Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to, and independent oversight of, management.

 

Mr. Kispert’s duties as Independent Chairman include:

 

   

chairing executive sessions of the independent directors;

 

   

ensuring that independent directors have adequate opportunities to meet without management present;

 

   

serving as designated contact for communication to independent directors, including being available for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders;

 

   

ensuring that the independent directors have an opportunity to provide input on the agenda for meetings of our Board;

 

8


Table of Contents
   

assuring that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; and

 

   

being identified as the recipient of communications with stockholders in the annual meeting proxy statement.

 

Our Board appoints our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary and all executive officers. All executive officers serve at the discretion of our Board. Each of our executive officers devotes his or her full time to our affairs. Our directors devote time to our affairs as is necessary to discharge their duties. In addition, our Board has the authority to retain its own advisers, at the Company’s expense, to assist it in the discharge of its duties.

 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

 

Our Board has an active role in overseeing management of the risks we face. This role is one of informed oversight rather than direct management of risk. Our Board regularly reviews and consults with management on the Company’s strategic direction and the challenges and risks we face. Our Board also reviews and discusses with management on a quarterly basis its financial results and forecasts. The Audit Committee of our Board oversees management of the Company’s financial risks, and oversees and reviews our risk management policies, including the Company’s investment policies and anti-fraud program. The Compensation Committee of our Board oversees our management of risks relating to and arising from our compensation plans and arrangements. These committees periodically report on these matters to the full Board.

 

Management is tasked with the direct management and oversight of legal, financial, and commercial compliance matters, which includes identification and mitigation of associated areas of risk. Our Chief Administrative Officer provides regular reports of legal risks and developments to the Audit Committee and to our full Board. Our Chief Financial Officer and our Corporate Controller provide regular reports to the Audit Committee concerning financial, tax and audit related risks. In addition, the Audit Committee receives periodic reports from management on our compliance programs and efforts, our investment policies and practices, and the results of various internal audit projects. The Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, together with members of management, provides analysis of risks related to our compensation programs and practices to the Compensation Committee.

 

Meetings of the Board of Directors

 

Our Board held seven meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. No director serving on our Board in fiscal 2016 attended fewer than 75 percent of the aggregate of the meetings of our Board held during the period for which he or she has been a director during fiscal 2016 and the meetings of the committees on which he or she served which were held during the periods in fiscal 2016 that he or she served on such committees.

 

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

 

We encourage director attendance at the Annual Meeting and we use reasonable efforts to schedule our Annual Meeting of stockholders at a time and date to maximize attendance by directors, taking into account our directors’ schedules. Of our current directors, Messrs. Carinalli, Kennedy, Kispert, Khanna, Meyercord and Shoemaker and Ms. Holmgren attended our 2015 Annual Meeting of stockholders.

 

Executive Sessions

 

The independent members of our Board meet regularly in executive session (without the presence or participation of non-independent directors), generally before or after a regularly scheduled Board meeting or at such other times as determined by our independent directors or our Chairman. Executive sessions of the independent directors are chaired by our Chairman. The executive sessions include discussions regarding guidance to be provided to the Chief Executive Officer and such other topics as the independent directors determine.

 

9


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

In fiscal 2016, our Board had the following three standing committees: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee; and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Board has adopted a written charter for each of these committees, which are available on the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.ExtremeNetworks.com.

 

Fiscal 2016 Committee Membership

 

The members and Chairmen of our standing committees in fiscal 2016 were as follows:

 

Name

   Audit
Committee
  Compensation
Committee
   Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Committee

Charles Carinalli

     Chairman    Member

Randi Paikoff Feigin

   Member(1)     

John H. Kispert

   Member(2)      Member(3)

Edward H. Kennedy

   Member   Member   

Raj Khanna

   Chairman(4)     

Edward B. Meyercord

       

John C. Shoemaker

     Member    Chairman

Kathleen M. Holmgren

   Member(5)     

 

(1) Ms. Feigin served as a member of the Audit Committee until November 12, 2015.
(2) Mr. Kispert served as Chairman of the Audit Committee until he resigned as Chairman effective August 25, 2015, and thereafter served as a member of the Audit Committee.
(3) Mr. Kispert was appointed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee effective August 25, 2015.
(4) Mr. Khanna served as a member of the Audit Committee until he was appointed Chairman of the Audit Committee effective August 25, 2015.
(5) Ms. Holmgren was appointed to the Audit Committee effective November 12, 2015.

 

Audit Committee.    The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Khanna, Kennedy and Kispert and Ms. Holmgren. Mr. Khanna serves as Chairman. Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee (i) is independent as defined in applicable NASDAQ rules; (ii) meets the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act; (iii) has not participated in the preparation of financial statements of the Company or any current subsidiary of the Company at any time during the past three years; and (iv) is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. Our Board further has determined that Mr. Khanna is an “audit committee financial expert”, as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. Additionally, our Board has determined that Mr. Khanna has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting or other comparable experience or background that results in his financial sophistication, including being or having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities.

 

The Audit Committee: retains our independent auditors; approves the planned scope, proposed fee arrangements and terms of engagement of the independent auditors; reviews the results of the annual audit of our financial statements and the interim reviews of our unaudited financial statements; evaluates the adequacy of accounting and financial controls; reviews the independence of our auditors; and oversees our financial reporting on behalf of the Board. The Audit Committee is also responsible for establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters, including anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters that

 

10


Table of Contents

may be submitted through our Whistleblower Hotline. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews with our independent auditors the scope and timing of their audit services and any other services they are asked to perform, the independent auditor’s report on our consolidated financial statements following completion of their audit, and our critical accounting policies and procedures and policies with respect to our internal accounting and financial controls. The Audit Committee also assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to financial risks, including risk management in the areas of financial reporting, internal controls, investments and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee annually reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its Audit Committee Charter. The Audit Committee held eight meetings during fiscal 2016.

 

Compensation Committee.    The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Carinalli, Kennedy, and Shoemaker. Mr. Carinalli serves as Chairman. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent for purposes of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, and are “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Compensation Committee is responsible for discharging our Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation and benefits of our executive officers, and evaluates and reports to our Board on matters concerning management performance, officer compensation and benefits plans and programs. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviews all components of executive officer compensation for consistency with our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee also administers our stock option plans and stock incentive plans. The Compensation Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. Our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer assist the Compensation Committee in its deliberations with respect to the compensation of our executive officers; provided, however, that neither individual participates in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations or voting regarding his or her own compensation. In connection with the Company’s annual compensation review, each executive officer discusses his or her individual performance with our Chief Executive Officer, who addresses such performance with the Compensation Committee, and the Chief Executive Officer discusses his individual performance directly with the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its Compensation Committee Charter. The Compensation Committee held seven meetings during fiscal 2016.

 

In fiscal 2016, as permitted by its Charter and the Board’s Governance Guidelines, and subject to the provisions of Section 152 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Compensation Committee delegated to management the ability to award time based restricted stock units under the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to employees of the Company below the level of Vice President for the remainder of the fiscal year. The delegation provided for limitations on the number of shares covered by the individual and aggregate awards, annual vesting over three years, and quarterly reporting to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has made a similar delegation for fiscal year 2017. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer presently approves such awards, with additional approval by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer given before the effective date of grant.

 

The Compensation Committee may retain, at the Company’s expense, one or more independent compensation consultants. As described in the “Compensation Disclosure & Analysis”, the Compensation Committee was advised by Compensia, Inc., a national compensation consulting firm, with respect to various compensation matters during fiscal 2016. Compensia has served as the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant since fiscal year 2013. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and is satisfied with the qualifications, performance and independence of Compensia. Compensia provides no services to the Company, other than services for the Compensation Committee.

 

For more information about the Compensation Committee’s role and practices regarding executive compensation, see the discussion below under the heading “Executive Compensation.”

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Shoemaker, Carinalli, and Kispert. Mr. Shoemaker serves as

 

11


Table of Contents

Chairman. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies, reviews, evaluates and nominates candidates to serve on our Board; recommends and approves corporate governance principles, codes of conduct and compliance mechanisms applicable to us, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines; and assists our Board in its annual reviews of the performance of our Board and each committee of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with board organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors and executive officers, and corporate governance. The Nominating and Corporate Committee periodically reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2016.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

None of our executive officers has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has, or has had, one or more executive officers who served as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee during fiscal 2016. No member of the Compensation Committee was, during fiscal 2016 or any prior period, an officer or employee of the Company.

 

Director Nominations

 

Director Qualifications.    In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers numerous factors in reviewing possible candidates for nomination as director, including:

 

   

the appropriate size of our Board and its committees;

 

   

the perceived needs of our Board for particular skills, industry expertise, background and business experience;

 

   

the skills, background, reputation, and business experience of nominees and the skills, background, reputation, and business experience already possessed by other members of our Board;

 

   

the nominees’ independence from management;

 

   

the nominees’ experience with accounting rules and practices;

 

   

the nominees’ background with regard to executive compensation;

 

   

the applicable regulatory and listing requirements, including independence requirements and legal considerations, such as antitrust compliance;

 

   

the benefits of a constructive working relationship among directors; and

 

   

the desire to balance the considerable benefit of continuity with the periodic injection of the fresh perspective provided by new members.

 

While we do not have a formal diversity policy for membership on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers many factors, including character, judgment, independence, age, education, expertise, diversity of experience, length of service, other commitments and ability to serve on committees of our Board, in evaluating potential candidates. It also considers individual attributes that contribute to board heterogeneity, including race, gender, and national origin. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not assign any particular weighting or priority to any of these factors or attributes.

 

There are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the factors and attributes discussed above will pay a material role in the recommendation of a candidate by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also believes it appropriate for one or more key members of management to participate as members of our Board.

 

12


Table of Contents

Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Nomination as Director.    The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually evaluates the current members of our Board whose terms are expiring and who are willing to continue in service to determine whether to recommend to the full Board that these directors be submitted to the stockholders for re-election.

 

Candidates for nomination as director come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from time to time through incumbent directors, management, stockholders or third parties. These candidates may be considered at meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at any point during the year. Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may poll directors and management for suggestions or conduct research to identify possible candidates if it believes that our Board requires additional members or nominees, or should add additional skills or experience. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may engage a third party search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates, as it deems appropriate.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for directors proposed by its stockholders. In order to be evaluated in connection with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s established procedures for evaluating potential director nominees, any recommendation for director nominee submitted by a stockholder must be sent in writing to the Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters and must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 120 days nor more than 150 calendar days in advance of the date that our proxy statement was released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s Annual Meeting of stockholders, except that if no Annual Meeting was held in the previous year or the date of the Annual Meeting has been changed by more than 30 calendar days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, notice by the stockholders to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. For purposes of the foregoing, “public announcement” shall mean disclosure in a broadly disseminated press release or in a document publicly filed by us with the SEC. The recommendation for director nominee submitted by a stockholder must contain the information required by our bylaws. You may contact our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates. Candidates recommended by our stockholders will be evaluated against the same factors as are applicable to candidates proposed by directors or management.

 

All directors and director nominees must submit a completed directors’ and officers’ questionnaire as part of the nominating process. The evaluation process may also include interviews and additional background and reference checks for non-incumbent nominees, at the discretion of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

Communications with Directors

 

John H. Kispert, our Independent Chairman, is responsible for receiving, distributing and arranging responses to communications from our stockholders to our Board. Stockholders may communicate with our Board by transmitting correspondence by mail, facsimile or email, addressed as follows:

 

Chairman of the Board (or individually named director(s))

Extreme Networks, Inc.

145 Rio Robles

San Jose, California 95134

 

The Chairman transmits each communication as soon as practicable to the identified director addressee(s), unless (i) there are safety or security concerns that mitigate against further transmission of the communication; or (ii) the communication contains commercial matters not related to the stockholder’s stock ownership, as determined by the Chairman in consultation with legal counsel. Our Board or individual directors are advised of

 

13


Table of Contents

any communication withheld for safety or security reasons as soon as practicable. Our directors have requested that the Chairman not forward to them advertisements, solicitations for periodicals or other subscriptions, and other similar communications.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, requires our executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of our common stock to file initial reports of beneficial ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. These persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms filed by such person. Based solely on our review of the forms furnished to us and written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of our common stock were complied with in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 except: (i) a Form 4 was filed on September 28, 2015 for an open market purchase transaction of 20,000 shares by Mr. Khanna that occurred on August 31, 2015; and (ii) information required on a Form 4 for a restricted stock unit grant made on November 12, 2015 to Ms. Holmgren was inadvertently filed on a Form 3 on November 19, 2015.

 

Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Materials

 

Our Board has adopted charters for its Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, which are available on the Corporate Governance section of our Investor Relations page of our website at www.ExtremeNetworks.com. Our Board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on our website on the Corporate Governance section of our Investor Relations page of our website at www.ExtremeNetworks.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding an amendment to or waiver from a provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website.

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

During fiscal 2016, the compensation policies for service on our Board and its committees were revised following consultation with Compensia, Inc., the independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee. For fiscal 2016, the compensation paid to our non-employee directors was as set forth below. Mr. Meyercord, who serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer, does not receive any additional compensation for his service on our Board.

 

Cash Compensation

 

During fiscal year 2016, non-employee directors received (a) $50,000 in cash compensation annually for Board service; and (b) the applicable compensation set forth below for serving either as a chair or as a member of one or more of the committees of our Board. Fees payable to directors who join the Board during the fiscal year, or who change Board assignments, are pro-rated to reflect the period of service. Each director further received reimbursement of expenses related to attendance of meetings of our Board and its committees, but no separate meeting fees are paid.

 

Fees for Fiscal Year 2016:

 

Annual Committee Member Compensation

  

Audit Committee

   $ 10,000   

Compensation Committee

     10,000   

Nominating and Governance Committee

     5,000   

 

14


Table of Contents

Annual Chairman or Committee Chair Compensation

  

Audit Committee Chair

   $ 25,000   

Compensation Committee Chair

     20,000   

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair

     10,000   

Board Chairman

     40,000   

 

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the director compensation program with its compensation consultant. On May 5, 2016, after consultation with Compensia, and to align with our peer group, the Compensation Committee increased the compensation for the Chairman of the Board by $5,000 per year, effective beginning in fiscal year 2017.

 

Equity Compensation

 

On the date of each Annual Meeting of our stockholders, each non-employee director continuing service with the Company after the meeting is granted an annual award of restricted stock units, or RSUs. The number of RSUs is determined by dividing $120,000 by the price of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of the Annual Meeting, rounded down to the nearest whole RSU. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of our common stock upon vesting and settlement. These annual RSU awards vest upon the earliest of the first anniversary of the date of grant, the date of next Annual Meeting of stockholders of the Company or a change in control of our company, in each case, subject to the director’s continued service with the Company through such date. On the date of the Annual Meeting of stockholders of the Company held on November 12, 2015, each non-employee director was granted 31,662 RSUs. Equity grants provided to directors who join the Board after the Annual Meeting of our stockholders, are pro-rated to reflect the period of service.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each non-employee director should own a minimum of the lesser of: 40,000 shares, or shares valued at three times (3x) the Company’s annual Board service retainer (which currently would be shares valued at $150,000). Each non-employee director has 5 years from his or her respective date of appointment to attain the minimum ownership level. All of our non-employee directors have met the minimum requirements of the share ownership guidelines or are not yet required to be in compliance with the requirements of the guidelines as they have not yet served for five years. We have not established any minimum equity ownership requirements for our executive officers.

 

2016 Director Compensation

 

The compensation information for our non-employee directors who served during fiscal 2016 is set forth below:

 

Name

   Director
Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
     Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
     Total ($)  

Charles P. Carinalli

     75,000         120,000         195,000   

Edward H. Kennedy

     70,000         120,000         190,000   

Raj Khanna

     72,758         120,000         192,758   

John H. Kispert

     98,370         120,000         218,370   

John C. Shoemaker

     70,000         120,000         190,000   

Kathleen M. Holmgren(3)

     38,152         120,000         158,152   

Randi Paikoff-Feigin(4)

     22,010         —           22,010   

 

15


Table of Contents

 

(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 718 and does not reflect whether the director has actually realized a financial benefit from the award. For additional information on the valuation assumptions used in determining aggregate grant date fair value, refer to Note 7 in our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on September 6, 2016.
(2) The following table shows the aggregate number of stock awards (including RSUs) and stock option awards held as of June 30, 2016 by each of our non-employee directors who served during fiscal year 2016:

 

Name

   Stock Awards (#)      Option Awards (#)  

Charles P. Carinalli

     31,662         90,000   

Edward H. Kennedy

     31,662         40,000   

Raj Khanna

     31,662         —     

John H. Kispert

     31,662         70,000   

John C. Shoemaker

     31,662         100,000   

Kathleen M. Holmgren

     31,662         —     

Randi Paikoff-Feigin

     —           —     

 

(3) Ms. Holmgren commenced service on our Board at our 2015 Annual Meeting of stockholders on November 12, 2015.
(4) Ms. Paikoff-Feigin ceased serving on our Board at our 2015 Annual Meeting of stockholders on November 12, 2015.

 

16


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL TWO:

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Background

 

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, our stockholders are entitled to vote to approve, on an advisory non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules. This is frequently referred to as a “Say on Pay” vote. The Board currently has adopted a policy providing for annual Say on Pay advisory votes. Unless the Board modifies this policy, the next Say on Pay advisory vote will be held at our 2017 Annual Meeting. This vote is intended to address the overall compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement with respect to their compensation, and not any specific item of compensation.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that our 2016 executive compensation program has been appropriately designed to advance stockholder interests through effective performance-based incentives with multi-year retention features. The last stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation was held in November 2015, and approximately 78 percent of votes cast were voted in favor of the Company’s compensation for its named executive officers (“NEOs”).

 

As described in further detail under the heading “Executive Compensation and Other Matters–Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation philosophy is designed to attract high quality candidates for senior leadership positions, to retain these employees, and to establish a total compensation program that motivates and rewards individual and team performance in a highly competitive industry. Our compensation programs are designed to align our executive officers’ performance with our goals and to create stockholder value.

 

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our compensation arrangements with our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement.

 

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

 

This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or against the proposal at the 2016 Annual Meeting, as well as the presence of a quorum representing a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will each be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum but will not have any effect on the outcome of the proposal.

 

This “Say on Pay” vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on us, the Compensation Committee or our Board. However, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders in their vote on this proposal, and will consider the outcome of this vote when making future decisions regarding the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

 

17


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL THREE:

RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2017

 

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017. KPMG has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since November 2010. A representative of KPMG is expected to be present at the 2016 Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if desired and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

Representatives of our independent auditors normally attend most meetings of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. Our independent auditors and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by our independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval policy. For fiscal 2016 and 2015, all fees paid to our independent auditors were pre-approved in accordance with this policy.

 

The Audit Committee on an annual basis reviews the services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews and approves the fees charged by the accounting firm. As such, all services provided by the accounting firm as set forth in the table below under Principal Accounting Fees and Services were approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has considered the role of the independent registered public accounting firm in providing tax and other non-audit services to us and has concluded that these services are compatible with the accounting firm’s independence as our independent auditors.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The following table sets forth the fees accrued or paid to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firms for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015.

 

     2016      2015  

Audit fees(1)

   $ 1,848,000       $ 2,040,053   

Audit related fees(2)

     78,000         —     

Tax Fees(3)

     25,000         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,951,000       $ 2,040,053   

 

(1) Audit fees relate to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, quarterly review of financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and audit services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings.
(2) Audit-related fees comprise fees for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements.
(3) Tax fees relate to professional services rendered in connection with tax audits, international tax compliance, and international tax consulting and planning services.

 

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

 

Stockholder ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our bylaws or otherwise by law. Our Board, however, is submitting the appointment of KPMG to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 

18


Table of Contents

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, assuming a quorum is present. Votes for or against this proposal, and abstentions and broker non-votes will each be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but abstentions and broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. If you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions on this proposal, your shares will be voted in favor of the proposal.

 

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG LLP TO SERVE AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2017.

 

19


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL FOUR:

RATIFY AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE COMPANY’S AMENDED AND RESTATED

RIGHTS AGREEMENT TO EXTEND THE AGREEMENT UNTIL MAY 31, 2017

 

Background

 

Our Board is inviting stockholders to vote to ratify, on a nonbinding advisory basis, Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, between the Company and Computershare Inc. as the rights agent (the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, including as amended by Amendment No. 4 is referred to herein as the “Restated Rights Plan”) to extend the term of the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement until May 31, 2017. The Restated Rights Plan governs the terms of each right (“Right”) that has been issued with respect to each share of common stock of the Company. Each Right initially represents the right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) of the Company.

 

The Board believed it to be in the best interests of the Company to enter into and to extend the Restated Rights Plan to preserve the value of the Company’s deferred tax assets, including its net operating loss carry forwards, with respect to its ability to fully use its tax benefits to offset future income. The Restated Rights Plan was adopted in part in an effort to preserve stockholder value by attempting to protect against a possible limitation on our ability to use our net operating loss carry-forwards and other tax attributes (the “Tax Benefits”) to reduce potential future federal income tax obligations. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards for U.S. federal and state tax purposes of $334.0 million and $144.7 million, respectively. The U.S. federal net operating loss carry-forwards of $334.0 million will begin to expire in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021 and state net operating losses of $144.7 million continued to expire during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016.

 

The unexpired balance of our Tax Benefits can generally be used to offset taxable income or income taxes (if any). Utilization of Tax Benefits to offset taxable income can, however, be limited if there is an ownership change, as discussed below. Because the amount and timing of our future taxable income cannot be accurately predicted, we cannot predict to what extent our Tax Benefits may ultimately be used to reduce our income tax liability. Although we are unable to quantify an exact value, we believe that the Tax Benefits are a very valuable asset. The Restated Rights Plan was adopted because the Board believed it to be in the Company’s and the stockholders’ best interests to attempt to prevent the imposition of limitations on use of the Tax Benefits.

 

The ability to use the Tax Benefits could be significantly impaired if there were an “ownership change” of the Company as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Determining whether an ownership change has occurred and the effect of an ownership change is complex. In general, to determine whether an ownership change has occurred on a testing date, the Company must compare the percentage of shares owned by each stockholder or groups of stockholders who own or are deemed to own directly or indirectly at least 5-percent of our stock (a “5-percent shareholder”) immediately after the close of the testing date to the lowest percentage of shares owned by such 5-percent shareholder at any time during the testing period (which is generally a three-year rolling period). The amount of the increase in the percentage of Company shares owned by each 5-percent shareholder whose share ownership percentage has increased is added together with increases in share ownership of other 5-percent shareholders, and an ownership change occurs if the aggregate increase in ownership by all such 5-percent shareholders exceeds 50 percent.

 

If an ownership change occurs, there is an annual limit on use of Tax Benefits (the “382 Limitation”) equal to (i) the aggregate value of our outstanding equity immediately prior to the ownership change (reduced by certain capital contributions made during the immediately preceding two years and certain other items) multiplied by (ii) the federal long-term tax-exempt interest rate in effect for the month of the ownership change. In calculating the 382 Limitation, numerous special rules and limitations apply, including provisions dealing with “built-in gains and losses.” If the Company were to have taxable income in excess of the 382 Limitation following an ownership change, the Company would not be able to offset tax on the excess income with the net

 

20


Table of Contents

operating losses. Although any loss carry forwards not used as a result of any Section 382 Limitation would remain available to offset income in future years (again, subject to the Section 382 Limitation in such future years) until the net operating losses expire, an ownership change could significantly defer the utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards, accelerate payment of federal income tax and could cause some of the net operating losses to expire unused. Because the aggregate value of our outstanding stock and the federal long-term tax-exempt interest rate fluctuate, it is impossible to predict with any accuracy the Section 382 Limitation upon the amount of our taxable income that could be offset by such loss carry forwards and credits if an ownership change were to occur in the future. Such limitation could, however, be material.

 

The Restated Rights Plan is designed to reduce the likelihood that the Company will experience an ownership change by discouraging any person (together with such person’s affiliates and associates), without the approval of the Board, from acquiring 4.95 percent or more of the outstanding common stock, or, if any person (together with such person’s affiliates and associates) already beneficially owns in excess of 4.95 percent or more of the outstanding common stock, from acquiring more shares of common stock, other than by exercise or conversion of currently existing warrants or as a result of a redemption of shares of common stock by the Company. There is no guarantee that the Restated Rights Plan will prevent the Company from experiencing an ownership change.

 

The following description of the Restated Rights Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Restated Rights Plan and thus should be read together with the full text of the Restated Rights Plan. The text of Amendment No. 4 was filed with the SEC on a Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 4.1 on May 9, 2016. The material terms of the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement were incorporated by reference into the May 9 filing from Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2012. We urge you to read carefully the Restated Rights Plan in its entirety, as the description below is only a summary.

 

Nature of Right:   

When exercisable, each Right will initially entitle the holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock.

 

Means of Distribution:   

The Rights will be distributed to holders of the Company’s outstanding common stock at a dividend of one Right for each share of common stock. The Rights will also be attached to all future issuances of common stock prior to the Distribution Date (as defined below).

 

Exercise Price:   

$150.00 per one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock, which is the amount that in the judgment of the Board represents the long-term value of the common stock over the term of the Restated Rights Plan (the “Exercise Price”).

 

Term:   

The Rights will expire upon the earlier of (i) May 31, 2017 or (ii) redemption or exchange by the Company as described in the Rights Agreement.

 

Redemption of Rights:   

Rights are redeemable at a price of $.001 per Right, by the vote of the Board, at any time until the occurrence of a Flip-In Event (defined below).

 

Preferred Stock:    The Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of the Rights will be nonredeemable and junior to any other series of preferred stock the Company may issue (unless otherwise provided in the terms of such other series). Each share of Preferred Stock will have a preferential cumulative quarterly dividend in an amount equal to the greater of (a) $3,750 or (b) 1,000 times the dividend declared on each share of common stock. In the event of liquidation, the holders of Preferred

 

21


Table of Contents
  

Stock will receive a preferred liquidation payment equal to the greater of (a) $150,000 per share, plus accrued dividends to the date of distribution, whether or not earned or declared, or (b) an amount per share equal to 1,000 times the aggregate payment to be distributed per share of common stock. Each share of Preferred Stock will have 1,000 votes, voting together with the shares of common stock. In the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which shares of common stock are exchanged for or changed into other securities, cash and/or other property, each share of Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive 1,000 times the amount and type of consideration received per share of common stock. The rights of the Preferred Stock as to dividends, liquidation and voting, and in the event of mergers and consolidations, are protected by customary anti-dilution provisions. Fractional shares (in integral multiples of one one-thousandth) of Preferred Stock will be issuable; however, the Company may elect to distribute depositary receipts in lieu of such fractional shares. In lieu of fractional shares other than fractions that are multiples of one one-thousandth of a share, an adjustment in cash will be made based on the market price of the Preferred Stock on the last trading date prior to the date of exercise. Because of the nature of the Preferred Stock’s dividend, liquidation and voting rights, the value of one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of each Right should approximate the value of one share of common stock.

 

Rights in Event of Self-Dealing Transaction or Acquisition of Substantial Amount of common stock:   

In the event that an Acquiring Person engages in certain self-dealing transactions or becomes a beneficial owner of 4.95 percent or more of the outstanding common stock (“Flip-In Events”), a holder of a Right thereafter has the right to purchase, upon payment of the then current Exercise Price, in lieu of one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock, such number of shares of common stock having a market value at the time of the transaction equal to the Exercise Price divided by one-half the Current Market Price (as defined in the Restated Rights Plan) of the common stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Rights held by the Acquiring Person or any associate or affiliate thereof or certain transferees will be null and void and no longer be transferable.

 

Self-dealing transactions are defined to include a consolidation, merger or other combination of an Acquiring Person with the Company in which the Company is the surviving corporation, the transfer of assets to the Company in exchange for securities of the Company, the acquisition of securities of the Company (other than in a pro rata distribution to all stockholders), the sale, purchase, transfer, distribution, lease, mortgage, pledge or acquisition of assets by the Acquiring Person to, from or with the Company on other than an arm’s length basis, compensation to an Acquiring Person for services (other than for employment as a regular or part-time employee or director on a basis consistent with the Company’s past practice), a loan or provision of other financial assistance (except proportionately as a stockholder) to an Acquiring Person or the licensing, sale or other transfer of proprietary technology or know-how from the Company to the Acquiring Person on terms not approved by the Board or a reclassification, recapitalization or other transaction with the effect of

 

22


Table of Contents
  

increasing by more than 1 percent the Acquiring Person’s proportionate share of any class of securities of the Company.

 

Rights in Event of Business Combination:   

If, following the occurrence of a Flip-In Event, the Company is acquired by any person in a merger or other business combination transaction in which the common stock is exchanged or converted or in which the Company is not the surviving corporation, or 50 percent or more of its assets or earnings power are sold to any person, each holder of a Right (other than an Acquiring Person, or affiliates or associates thereof) shall thereafter have the right to purchase, upon payment of the then current Exercise Price, such number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company having a current market value equal to the Exercise Price divided by one-half the Current Market Price of such common stock.

 

Exchange Option:   

In the event (i) any person or group becomes an Acquiring Person or (ii) any of the types of transactions, acquisitions or other events described above as self-dealing transactions occur, and prior to the acquisition by such person or group of 50 percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, the Board may require all or any portion of the outstanding Rights (other than Rights owned by such Acquiring Person which have become void) to be exchanged for common stock on a pro rata basis, at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock or one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock (or of a share of a class or series of the Company’s Preferred Stock having equivalent rights, preferences and privileges) per Right (subject to adjustment).

 

Fractional Shares:   

No fractional shares of common stock will be issued upon exercise of the Rights and, in lieu thereof, a payment in cash will be made to the holder of such Rights equal to the same fraction of the current market value of a share of common stock.

 

Adjustment:   

The Exercise Price payable, and the number of shares of Preferred Stock or other securities or property issuable, upon exercise of the Rights are subject to adjustment from time to time to prevent dilution (i) in the event of a stock dividend on, or a subdivision, combination or reclassification of the Preferred Stock, (ii) upon the grant to holders of the Preferred Stock of certain rights or warrants to subscribe for Preferred Stock or convertible securities at less than the current market price of the Preferred Stock or (iii) upon the distribution to holders of the Preferred Stock of evidences of indebtedness or assets (excluding dividends payable in Preferred Stock) or of subscription rights or warrants (other than those referred to above). The number of Rights associated with each share of common stock is also subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split of the common stock or a stock dividend on the common stock payable in common stock or subdivisions, consolidations or combinations of the common stock occurring, in any such case, prior to the Distribution Date.

 

Rights as Stockholder:    The Rights themselves do not entitle the holder thereof to any rights as a stockholder, including, without limitation, voting rights or the right to receive dividends.

 

23


Table of Contents
Amendment of Rights:    Until the Rights become nonredeemable, the Company may, except with respect to the redemption price, amend the Restated Rights Plan in any manner. After the Rights become nonredeemable, the Company may amend the Restated Rights Plan to cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provision which may be defective or inconsistent with any other provisions, to shorten or lengthen any time period under the Restated Rights Plan, or to change or supplement any provision in any manner the Company may deem necessary or desirable, provided that no such amendment may adversely affect the interests of the holders of the Rights (other than the Acquiring Person or its Affiliates or associates) or cause the Rights to again be redeemable or the Restated Rights Plan to again be freely amendable.

 

Although none of the Restated Rights Plan, our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws or applicable law require stockholder approval or ratification of the Restated Rights Plan, our Board has decided to request the stockholders ratify, on a nonbinding advisory basis, the extension of the Restated Rights Plan to May 31, 2017. If the extension of the Restated Rights Plan is not ratified by our stockholders as proposed, the Board will consider whether to terminate the Restated Rights Plan following the Annual Meeting or to permit the Restated Rights Plan to expire per its terms on May 31, 2017. Regardless, the Board may elect to extend the Restated Rights Plan or adopt a new stockholder rights plan at a future date if it determines that the adoption of a stockholder rights plan is in the stockholders’ best interests at that time.

 

Anti-Takeover Effects

 

While intended to reduce the risk of an “ownership change” within the meaning of Section 382 of the Code, and thereby preserve the current ability of the Company to utilize the Tax Benefits, the Rights could have certain anti-takeover effects. The Rights will cause substantial dilution to a person or group who becomes an Acquiring Person on terms not approved by the Company’s Board. The Rights should not interfere with any merger or other business combination approved by the Board since the Board may exempt such merger or business combination from the Restated Rights Plan. In addition, the Rights may be redeemed by the Company at any time as described above.

 

Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation

 

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this vote.

 

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE EXTENSION OF THE TERM OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN TO MAY 31, 2017.

 

24


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL FIVE:

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE EXTREME

NETWORKS, INC. 2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 

The Company’s stockholders are being asked to approve the amendment and restatement of the 2013 Plan (which we refer to in this Proposal as the Amended Equity Plan), which would increase the number of shares issuable under the current 2013 Plan (which we refer to in this Proposal as the Current Equity Plan) by 8,300,000 shares that could be issued as stock options and/or stock appreciation rights (but if awards are granted only in the form of restricted stock units or other full value awards, this increase in shares would allow for the issuance of only up to approximately 5,533,333 shares).

 

As of September 15, 2016, the Current Equity Plan had approximately 2,349,969 shares remaining available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the plan. We consider the addition of 8,300,000 shares to the Amended Equity Plan to be very important to the future of the Company. We believe that the current share reserves in the Current Equity Plan will not be sufficient to provide meaningful equity incentives to our employees so that we may continue to compete successfully for talent and to achieve our corporate goals.

 

Our Board is requesting this vote by the stockholders to approve the increase of 8,300,000 shares available for issuance under the Amended Equity Plan and satisfy the stockholder approval requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. In addition, we are asking you to approve other amendments to the Current Equity Plan as described in more detail below. If the stockholders do not approve the Amended Equity Plan, the Amended Equity Plan will not become effective, the Current Equity Plan will continue in effect pursuant to its current terms and conditions, and we may continue to grant awards under the Current Equity Plan, subject to its terms, conditions and limitations. Stockholders should carefully read this proxy statement in its entirety for more detailed information concerning the proposal to approve the Amended Equity Plan. Additionally, stockholders are directed to the full Amended Equity Plan, which is attached as Exhibit A to this proxy statement. Any summary of the Amended Equity Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended Equity Plan.

 

Overview

 

We operate in a challenging marketplace in which our success depends to a great extent on our ability to attract and retain employees, directors and other service providers of the highest caliber. One of the tools our Board regards as essential in addressing these challenges is a competitive equity incentive program. Our stock incentive program provides a range of incentive tools and sufficient flexibility to permit the Compensation Committee of the Board to implement them in ways that will make the most effective use of the shares our stockholders authorize for incentive purposes. We intend to use these incentives to attract new key employees and to continue to retain existing key employees, directors and other service providers for the long-term benefit of the Company and its stockholders.

 

The Current Equity Plan allows the Company to grant equity compensation awards to employees (including officers), consultants and non-employee directors of the Company and the employees and consultants of its parent or subsidiaries. The Current Equity Plan permits the Company to grant service-based awards and performance-based awards. The Current Equity Plan provides that 15,628,643 shares may be issued under the plan (which includes 6,628,463 shares under the Predecessor Plan (as defined in the Current Equity Plan)), and the plan includes a fungible share reserve whereby each share subject to a full-value award, such as restricted stock units (which we refer to as RSUs), granted under the Current Equity Plan results in decreasing the Current Equity Plan share reserve by 1.5 shares.

 

As of September 15, 2016, the Current Equity Plan had approximately 2,349,969 shares remaining available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the plan. The Company is asking its stockholders to approve adding 8,300,000 shares of our common stock to those reserved for issuance under the Current Equity Plan, which would be reduced to 5,533,333 shares of our common stock if all were issued pursuant to full-value awards.

 

25


Table of Contents

If the Company’s stockholders do not approve this proposal, the Company may not be able to continue to offer competitive equity packages to retain current employees and employees hired in fiscal year 2017 and later. We would also lose a major tool in aligning the interests of our executives and employees with those of the Company’s stockholders. In the event the Company’s stockholders do not approve the Amended Equity Plan to increase the share reserve, the proposed amendment will not take effect and the Current Equity Plan will continue to be administered in its current form without any increase in the Current Equity Plan’s share reserve and without implementation of the other terms described above.

 

Proposed Amendments to the Current Equity Plan

 

The only amendments proposed to be made to the plan since the last stockholder approval in 2013 are as follows:

 

   

adding 8,300,000 shares of our common stock to those reserved for issuance under the Current Equity Plan, which would be reduced to 5,533,333 shares of our common stock if all were issued pursuant to full-value awards; and

 

   

imposing a minimum vesting period of one year to all awards (subject to a five percent (5%) carve-out).

 

Why the Company Stockholders Should Vote for the Amended Company Stock Plan

 

The following summarizes some of the reasons why we believe the Company’s stockholders should approve this proposal.

 

Equity Compensation Awards Allow the Company to Implement its Philosophy of Pay for Performance

 

The Company uses a mix of service-based awards and performance based awards for its executive officers and other employees as discussed in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”). The performance-based awards are eligible to vest only if certain performance milestones are achieved. If the Company’s stockholders approve the Amended Equity Plan, the Company will be able to continue to use equity awards to emphasize the achievement of important business objectives of the Company and, consistent with its pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, directly link executive pay with performance.

 

In addition, approval of the Amended Equity Plan by our stockholders will extend the period of time during which we may grant awards under the Amended Equity Plan qualifying as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code through the first to occur of a change in the material terms of the potential performance goals under the Amended Equity Plan or our 2021 Annual Meeting of stockholders.

 

The Company’s Stock Plan is a Critical Element of its Compensation Policy

 

We believe that our employees are the Company’s most valuable asset. Accordingly, the approval of the Amended Equity Plan is in the best interest of our stockholders, as equity awards granted under the Amended Equity Plan will help the Company to:

 

   

attract, motivate, and retain talented employees, consultants and non-employee directors;

 

   

align employee and stockholder interests;

 

   

link employee compensation with company performance; and

 

   

maintain a culture based on employee stock ownership.

 

If the Company’s stockholders do not approve the Amended Equity Plan, the Company’s growth could be significantly hampered and its ability to operate its business could be adversely affected. If we do not have sufficient shares in the plan to provide meaningful equity incentives, the Company may be compelled to instead

 

26


Table of Contents

offer additional cash-based incentives to compete for talent, which could have a significant effect upon its quarterly results of operations, its cash flow, and its balance sheet. Moreover, this would not be competitive with most other technology companies where equity compensation is an integral part of the compensation offered by these firms. The Company’s success over the next few years will depend heavily on its ability to attract and retain high caliber employees, consultants and board members. The ability to grant equity awards is a necessary and powerful recruiting and retention tool for the Company to hire and motivate the quality personnel it needs to move its business forward.

 

The Amended Equity Plan Conforms to Best Practices

 

The Amended Equity Plan is designed to conform to best practices in equity incentive plans. For example, the Amended Equity Plan:

 

   

prohibits equity award re-pricing without stockholder approval;

 

   

permits a maximum term for options and stock appreciation rights of only seven years;

 

   

permits the granting of full-value awards such as RSUs, which can be granted in lieu of stock options to reduce the total number of shares necessary to grant competitive equity awards;

 

   

imposes a minimum vesting period of one year to all awards (subject to a five percent (5%) carve-out); and

 

   

applies a fungible share reserve whereby each share of our common stock underlying a full-value award issued results in reducing the shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the Amended Equity Plan by 1.5 shares.

 

We Manage Our Equity Incentive Program Thoughtfully

 

We manage our long-term stockholder dilution by limiting the number of equity awards granted annually and limiting what we grant to what we believe is an appropriate amount of equity necessary to attract, reward and retain employees.

 

As of September 15, 2016, equity awards outstanding under all of the Company’s equity plans (including the Current Equity Plan) were approximately: 5,649,037 stock options, no unvested restricted stock, 4,842,749 RSUs and 1,125,363 PSUs (including our market-based performance awards (“MSUs”)). As of September 15, 2016, we had 106,765,827 shares outstanding. Accordingly, our approximately 11,617,149 outstanding awards (not including awards under our employee stock purchase plan) plus 2,349,969 shares available for future grant under the Company’s equity plans (not including under our employee stock purchase plan) as of September 15, 2016 represented approximately 13.08% of our Common Stock outstanding (commonly referred to as the “overhang”).

 

As of September 15, 2016, the average weighted per share exercise price of all outstanding stock options (whether granted under the Current Equity Plan, under equity plans assumed in connection with corporate transactions or under our previous equity plans) was $4.1369 and the weighted average remaining contractual term was 3.42 years.

 

Stock Compensation Metrics

 

Dilution

 

Dilution is a concept that may be used to measure the long-term effect of a company’s equity compensation programs. There are various methods to calculate and determine dilution. This discussion is based on the methodology employed by Institutional Shareholder Services, or ISS, an independent proxy advisory firm. Dilution has been calculated by dividing the total shares underlying all outstanding equity-based compensation

 

27


Table of Contents

(including 5,401,052 shares, as of June 30, 2016, which are available for grant but not outstanding) by the Company’s total number of shares outstanding. This calculation includes all outstanding options (whether or not “in the money”) and full value awards that may or may not vest because they are not yet earned or because performance criteria may not be achieved. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had approximately 6,385,007 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options outstanding and approximately 4,224,020 unvested full-value awards outstanding, of which approximately 399,853 are unvested performance-based awards. Using the foregoing calculation, the Company’s dilution as of June 30, 2016 was approximately 13.37%, a 41.61% change over the three-year period. The dilution for each of the three-years ended with fiscal year 2016 is set forth below.

 

Burn Rate

 

Burn rate measures the effect of equity compensation on a company over a specified time. To monitor the Company’s burn rate, the Company uses various independent burn rate calculation methodologies including those developed and employed by ISS. ISS has set industry standard burn rates for our global industry classification standard at 6.19% for shareholder meetings occurring after February 1, 2016. The annual burn rate is determined by dividing the sum of the number of stock options granted and full value shares awarded (restricted stock units and delivered performance-based restricted stock units) during a given year by the Company’s weighted average common shares outstanding. This methodology ignores the impact of cancellations, which is usually significant. Under this methodology, we applied a 2x multiplier to make an adjustment to account for full value awards. Using this methodology, the Company’s one year burn rate for fiscal year 2016 was 6.67% and its average burn rate for the three-year fiscal periods 2014 through 2016 was 8.43%. The Company’s burn rates for the three-year period ended with fiscal year 2016 are set forth below.

 

The Company also considers the net burn rate. Net burn rate adds an additional perspective in that it allows direct insight into the real impact the Company’s stock compensation programs have on dilution by considering the rate at which cancellations impact the true burn rate. Cancellations usually occur when an employee terminates or a performance target is not met. At termination, any unvested RSU, PSU and MSU awards are returned to the share reserve pool and are eligible for re-granting. The Company’s one year net burn rate for 2016 was 5.18% and its average net burn rate for the three-year period 2014 through 2016 was 3.62%, both of which are below the ISS industry standard burn rate discussed above. The Company is committed to managing the Company’s net burn rate. The Company’s net burn rates for the three-year period ended with fiscal year 2016 are set forth below.

 

     FY2014    FY2015    FY2016

Dilution(1)

   21.27%    17.57%    13.37%

1YR Burn Rate(1)

   9.42%    6.58%    6.67%

3YR Burn Rate(1)

   8.27%    7.56%    8.43%

ISS Industry Standard Burn Rate

   5.49%    5.85%    6.19%

1YR Net Burn Rate(2)

   3.11%    2.55%    5.18%

3YR Net Burn Rate(2)

   4.69%    3.74%    3.62%

 

(1) Using the burn rate calculation methodology described above we applied a 2x multiplier to make an adjustment to account for full value awards. Burn rate does not include cancellations in that year.
(2) Using the net burn rate calculation methodology described above we applied a 1x multiplier to make an adjustment to account for full value awards. Net burn rate includes total grants made in a year net of cancellations in that year.

 

28


Table of Contents

Performance-Based Full Value Award Activity(1)

 

     FY2014      FY2015      FY2016  

Granted(2)

     0         615         695   

Earned(3)

     25         0         582   

Earned and Released

     25         0         217   

Earned and Unreleased

     0         0         265   

Earned and Cancelled/Forfeited

     0         0         100   

Net(4)

     25         0         482   

 

(1) In thousands, shares earned included in burn rate calculations above.
(2) Table includes PSUs and MSUs granted in the relevant fiscal year.
(3) For purposes of this table shares are earned when the performance or market-based criteria is satisfied. Earned shares may be subject to additional service-based vesting requirements.
(4) For purposes of this table, the net shares is the difference between the shares earned in a fiscal year and the shares cancelled/forfeited in a fiscal year.

 

Performance-Based Option Award Activity(1)

 

     FY2014      FY2015     FY2016  

Granted(2)

     0         900        0   

Earned(3)

     900         0        300   

Cancelled/Forfeited

     0         900        0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net(4)

     900         (900     300   

 

(1) In thousands, options earned included in burn rate calculations above.
(2) Table includes performance-based option awards granted in the relevant fiscal year.
(3) For purposes of this table options are earned when the performance criteria is satisfied. Earned options may be subject to additional service-based vesting requirements.
(4) For purposes of this table, the net options is the difference between the options earned in a fiscal year and the options cancelled/forfeited in a fiscal year.

 

Service-Based Full Value Award Activity(1)

 

     FY2014      FY2015      FY2016  

Granted(2)

     2484         2,619         2,703   

Cancelled/Forfeited

     298         811         859   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net(3)

     2,186         1,358         1,844   

 

(1) In thousands, shares granted included in burn rate calculations above. This table excludes the awards assumed in connection with the Enterasys acquisition in FY14.
(2) Table includes service-based RSUs granted in the relevant fiscal year, but does not include PSUs and MSUs.
(3) For purposes of this table, the net shares is the difference between the shares granted in a fiscal year and the shares cancelled/forfeited in a fiscal year.

 

Service-Based Option Award Activity(1)

 

     FY2014      FY2015      FY2016  

Granted(2)

     2,180         1,276         5   

Cancelled/Forfeited

     1,254         1,855         3,151   

Net(3)

     926         -579         -3,146   

 

29


Table of Contents

 

(1) In thousands, options granted included in burn rate calculations above. This table excludes the options assumed in connection with the Enterasys acquisition in FY14.
(2) Table includes service-based option awards granted in the relevant fiscal year, but does not include performance-based options.
(3) For purposes of this table, the net options is the difference between the options granted in a fiscal year and the options cancelled/forfeited in a fiscal year.

 

Forecasted Grants

 

The Company anticipates that the proposed share increase to the plan, based on currently projected share use, will be sufficient for the granting of equity awards through approximately fiscal year 2018. As a result, the Company anticipates that the Company will be requesting additional shares under the plan in fiscal 2019. Despite the projected share use described above, future circumstances and business needs may dictate a different result.

 

The currently requested share increase is expected to result in the following three year average burn rates using the above methodology:

 

   

net burn rate of 3.99%; and

 

   

burn rate of 5.46%.

 

After considering the above factors, including the fact that Company’s expected three-year average burn rate (as we believe would be calculated at the end of the next three years) is expected to meet the ISS standard Industry Burn Rate of 6.19%, the Company’s Board approved the share increase.

 

New Plan Benefits/Company Awards to be Granted to Certain Individuals and Groups

 

The actual number of awards (if any) that an executive officer, employee or consultant of the Company or its parent or subsidiaries or a non-employee director of the Company may receive under the Amended Equity Plan is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and therefore cannot be determined in advance. The following table sets forth certain information relating to awards granted in fiscal year 2016 under the Current Equity Plan to the listed persons and groups. As of June 30, 2016, the closing price of a share of the Company’s common was $3.39 per share.

 

30


Table of Contents

Grants under Current Equity Plan Made in FY16

 

Name and Position

   Number  of
Shares
Granted  Under
Company
Options
     Weighted
Average Per Share
Exercise
Price ($)
     Number Of
Full Value
Awards
Granted
     Grant Date
Value  Of Full
Value
Awards ($)(1)
 

Edward B. Meyercord

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

     —           —           —           —     

Benjamin Drew Davies

EVP, Chief Financial Officer

     —           —           200,000         663,000   

Robert Gault

Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Services, and Channels

     —           —           160,000         399,200   

Kenneth Arola(2)

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

     —           —           120,000         299,400   

Katayoun Motiey(3)

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary

     —           —           280,000         1,122,800   

Norman Rice(4)

Executive Vice President, Marketing and Corporate Development

     —           —           120,000         299,400   
All current executive officers as of June 30, 2016 as a group (3 persons)      —           —           360,000         1,062,200   
All non-employee directors as of June 30, 2016 as a group (6 persons)      —           —           189,972         719,994   
All employees who are not current executive officers as of June 30, 2016 as a group      4,800       $ 3.79         2,728,470         8,627,499   

 

(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the value of the awards, refer to Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
(2) Mr. Arola ceased to serve as an executive officer of the Company on May 31, 2016, and his employment terminated effective June 30, 2016.
(3) Ms. Motiey ceased to serve as an executive officer on February 9, 2016, after the Board’s periodic review of those officers that should be designated as an executive officer.
(4) Mr. Rice ceased to serve as an executive office on February 9, 2016, after the Board’s periodic review of those officers that should be designated as an executive officer.

 

Summary Description of the Amended Equity Plan

 

The following summary of the Amended Equity Plan is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the Amended Equity Plan, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Exhibit A.

 

31


Table of Contents

General.    The purpose of the Amended Equity Plan is to advance the interests of the Company and its stockholders by providing an incentive program that will enable the Company to attract and retain employees, consultants and directors and to provide them with an equity interest in the growth and profitability of the Company. These incentives may be provided through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, other stock-based awards and cash-based awards.

 

Authorized Shares.    The maximum aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the Amended Equity Plan is the sum of 17,300,000 shares plus up to 6,628,643 additional shares, comprised of the number of shares remaining available for grant under the Predecessor Plan as of June 30, 2016 and the number of shares subject to any option or other award outstanding under the Predecessor Plan that expires or is forfeited for any reason. As of June 30, 2016, there were 5,401,052 shares remaining available for grant under the Predecessor Plan and 10,609,027 shares subject to unexercised options and other awards remaining unvested and subject to potential forfeiture under the Predecessor Plans.

 

Share Counting.    Each share subject to a stock option, stock appreciation right, or other award that requires the participant to purchase shares for their fair market value determined at the time of grant will reduce the number of shares remaining available for grant under the Amended Equity Plan by one share. However, each share subject to a “full value” award (i.e., an award settled in stock, other than an option, stock appreciation right, or other award that requires the participant to purchase shares for their fair market value determined at grant) will reduce the number of shares remaining available for grant under the Amended Equity Plan by 1.5 shares.

 

If any award granted under the Amended Equity Plan expires or otherwise terminates for any reason without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited or repurchased by the Company for not more than the participant’s purchase price, any such shares reacquired or subject to a terminated award will again become available for issuance under the Amended Equity Plan.

 

Shares will not be treated as having been issued under the Amended Equity Plan and will therefore not reduce the number of shares available for issuance to the extent an award is settled in cash. Shares that are withheld or reacquired by the Company in satisfaction of a tax withholding obligation in connection with an option or a stock appreciation right or that are tendered in payment of the exercise price of an option will not be made available for new awards under the Amended Equity Plan. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right or net-exercise of an option, the number of shares available under the Amended Equity Plan will be reduced by the gross number of shares for which the award is exercised.

 

Adjustments for Capital Structure Changes.    Appropriate and proportionate adjustments will be made to the number of shares authorized under the Amended Equity Plan, to the numerical limits on certain types of awards described below, and to outstanding awards in the event of any change in our common stock through merger, consolidation, reorganization, reincorporation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, split-off, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares or similar change in our capital structure, or if we make a distribution to our stockholders in a form other than common stock (excluding regular, periodic cash dividends) that has a material effect on the fair market value of our common stock. In such circumstances, the Compensation Committee also has the discretion under the Amended Equity Plan to adjust other terms of outstanding awards as it deems appropriate.

 

Nonemployee Director Award Limits.    A nonemployee director may not be granted awards under the Amended Equity Plan for more than 200,000 shares in any fiscal year.

 

Other Award Limits.    To enable compensation provided in connection with certain types of awards intended to qualify as “performance-based” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Amended Equity Plan establishes a limit on the maximum aggregate number of shares or dollar value for which such awards may be granted to an employee in any fiscal year, as follows:

 

   

No more than 4,000,000 shares under stock options and stock appreciation rights.

 

32


Table of Contents
   

No more than 1,000,000 shares under restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards.

 

   

No more than 1,000,000 shares or $2,000,000 for each full fiscal year contained in the performance period under performance share and performance unit awards.

 

   

No more than 1,000,000 shares or $2,000,000 for each full fiscal year contained in the performance period under other stock-based or cash-based awards.

 

In addition, to comply with applicable tax rules, the Amended Equity Plan also limits to 9,000,000 the number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options granted under the Amended Equity Plan.

 

Administration.    The Amended Equity Plan generally will be administered by the Compensation Committee, although the Board retains the right to appoint another of its committees to administer the Amended Equity Plan or to administer the Amended Equity Plan directly. In the case of awards intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m) of the Code, administration of the Amended Equity Plan must be by a compensation committee comprised solely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m). For purposes of this summary, the term “Compensation Committee” will refer to either such duly appointed committee or the Board of Directors. Subject to the provisions of the Amended Equity Plan, the Compensation Committee determines in its discretion the persons to whom and the times at which awards are granted, the types and sizes of awards, and all of their terms and conditions. The Compensation Committee may, subject to certain limitations on the exercise of its discretion required by Section 162(m) or otherwise provided by the Amended Equity Plan, amend, cancel or renew any award, waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any award, and accelerate, continue, extend or defer the vesting of any award.

 

The Amended Equity Plan provides, subject to certain limitations, for indemnification by the Company of any director, officer or employee against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in connection with any legal action arising from such person’s action or failure to act in administering the Amended Equity Plan. All awards granted under the Amended Equity Plan will be evidenced by a written or digitally signed agreement between the Company and the participant specifying the terms and conditions of the award, consistent with the requirements of the Amended Equity Plan. The Compensation Committee will interpret the Amended Equity Plan and awards granted under it, and all determinations of the Compensation Committee generally will be final and binding on all persons having an interest in the Amended Equity Plan or any award.

 

Prohibition of Option and SAR Repricing.    The Amended Equity Plan expressly provides that, without the approval of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at a meeting of our stockholders, the Compensation Committee may not provide for any of the following with respect to underwater options or stock appreciation rights: (1) either the cancellation of such outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for the grant of new options or stock appreciation rights at a lower exercise price or the amendment of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights to reduce the exercise price, (2) the issuance of new full value awards in exchange for the cancellation of such outstanding options or stock appreciation rights, or (3) the cancellation of such outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for payments in cash.

 

Eligibility.    Awards may be granted to employees, directors and consultants of the Company or any present or future parent or subsidiary corporation or other affiliated entity of the Company. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees who, as of the time of grant, are employees of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company. As of June 30, 2016, we had approximately 1,378 employees worldwide (including three current executive officers) and six non-employee directors who would be eligible to receive awards under the Amended Equity Plan. Upon the closing of our acquisition of certain business assets from Zebra Technologies, Inc., announced in September 2016 and expected to close before the end of calendar year 2016, approximately 1,651 employees worldwide will be eligible to receive awards under the Amended Equity Plan.

 

33


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, as of September 15, 2016, the equity award grants made under the 2013 Plan since its adoption:

 

     Equity Awards  Granted
Under Current Equity Plan
 
     No. of Shares
Underlying Options
     No. of  RSUs(1)  

Named Executive Officers:

     

Edward B. Meyercord

     

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

     900,000         1,009,042   

Benjamin Drew Davies

     

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

     0         200,000   

Robert Gault

     

Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Services, and Channels

     100,000         400,000   

Kenneth Arola(2)

     

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

     268,000         297,025   

Katayoun Motiey(3)

     

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary

     0         385,000   

Norman Rice(4)

     

Executive Vice President, Marketing and Corporate Development

     100,000         332,250   

All Current Executive Officers as a Group (3 persons):

     1,000,000         1,609,042   

Non-Executive Directors as a Group (6 persons):

     0         429,758   

All Non-Executive Officer Employees as a Group:

     1,970,400         6,738,739   

 

(1) Includes time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units (including PSUs and MSUs, as defined below).
(2) Mr. Arola ceased to serve as an executive officer of the Company on May 31, 2016, and his employment terminated effective June 30, 2016.
(3) Ms. Motiey ceased to serve as an executive officer on February 9, 2016, after the Board’s periodic review of those officers that should be designated as an executive officer.
(4) Mr. Rice ceased to serve as an executive office on February 9, 2016, after the Board’s periodic review of those officers that should be designated as an executive officer.

 

Vesting.    Awards under the Amended Equity Plan will vest over not less than one year following the date the award is made, or in the case of vesting based upon the attainment of performance goals or other performance-based objectives, over a period of not less than one year measured from the commencement of the performance period. The Compensation Committee may provide that such vesting restrictions lapse or are waived upon the participant’s death, disability, retirement or other specified termination or upon a change of control. The Compensation Committee may grant awards that will result in the issuance of up to 5% of the shares reserved for issuance under the Amended Equity Plan without regard to the minimum vesting provisions.

 

Stock Options.    The Compensation Committee may grant nonstatutory stock options, incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, or any combination of these. The exercise price of each option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. However, any incentive stock option granted to a person who at the time of grant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company (a “10% Stockholder”) must have an exercise price equal to at least 110% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant.

 

The Amended Equity Plan provides that the option exercise price may be paid in cash, by check, or cash equivalent; by means of a broker-assisted cashless exercise; by means of a net-exercise procedure; to the extent legally permitted, by tender to the Company of shares of common stock owned by the participant having a fair market value not less than the exercise price; by such other lawful consideration as approved by the

 

34


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee; or by any combination of these. Nevertheless, the Compensation Committee may restrict the forms of payment permitted in connection with any option grant. No option may be exercised unless the participant has made adequate provision for federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, relating to the exercise of the option, including, if permitted or required by the Company, through the participant’s surrender of a portion of the option shares to the Company.

 

Options will become vested and exercisable at such times or upon such events and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria or restrictions as specified by the Compensation Committee. The maximum term of any option granted under the Amended Equity Plan is seven years, provided that an incentive stock option granted to a 10% Stockholder must have a term not exceeding five years. Unless otherwise permitted by the Compensation Committee, an option generally will remain exercisable for three months following the participant’s termination of service, provided that if service terminates as a result of the participant’s death or disability, the option generally will remain exercisable for 12 months, but in any event the option must be exercised no later than its expiration date, and provided further that an option will terminate immediately upon a participant’s termination for cause (as defined by the Amended Equity Plan).

 

Options are nontransferable by the participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and are exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant. However, an option may be assigned or transferred to certain family members or trusts for their benefit to the extent permitted by the Compensation Committee and, in the case of an incentive stock option, only to the extent that the transfer will not terminate its tax qualification.

 

Stock Appreciation Rights.    The Compensation Committee may grant stock appreciation rights either in tandem with a related option (a “Tandem SAR”) or independently of any option (a “Freestanding SAR”). A Tandem SAR requires the option holder to elect between the exercise of the underlying option for shares of common stock or the surrender of the option and the exercise of the related stock appreciation right. A Tandem SAR is exercisable only at the time and only to the extent that the related stock option is exercisable, while a Freestanding SAR is exercisable at such times or upon such events and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria or restrictions as specified by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price of each stock appreciation right may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant.

 

Upon the exercise of any stock appreciation right, the participant is entitled to receive an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock as to which the right is exercised over the aggregate exercise price for such shares. Payment of this amount upon the exercise of a Tandem SAR may be made only in shares of common stock whose fair market value on the exercise date equals the payment amount. At the Compensation Committee’s discretion, payment of this amount upon the exercise of a Freestanding SAR may be made in cash or shares of common stock. The maximum term of any stock appreciation right granted under the Amended Equity Plan is seven years.

 

Stock appreciation rights are generally nontransferable by the participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and are generally exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant. If permitted by the Compensation Committee, a Tandem SAR related to a nonstatutory stock option and a Freestanding SAR may be assigned or transferred to certain family members or trusts for their benefit to the extent permitted by the Compensation Committee. Other terms of stock appreciation rights are generally similar to the terms of comparable stock options.

 

Restricted Stock Awards.    The Compensation Committee may grant restricted stock awards under the Amended Equity Plan either in the form of a restricted stock purchase right, giving a participant an immediate right to purchase common stock, or in the form of a restricted stock bonus, in which stock is issued in consideration for services to the Company rendered by the participant. The Compensation Committee determines the purchase price payable under restricted stock purchase awards, which may be less than the then current fair market value of our common stock. Restricted stock awards may be subject to vesting conditions based on such

 

35


Table of Contents

service or performance criteria as the Compensation Committee specifies, including the attainment of one or more performance goals similar to those described below in connection with performance awards. Shares acquired pursuant to a restricted stock award may not be transferred by the participant until vested. Unless otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, a participant will forfeit any shares of restricted stock as to which the vesting restrictions have not lapsed prior to the participant’s termination of service. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, participants holding restricted stock will have the right to vote the shares and to receive any dividends paid, except that dividends or other distributions paid in shares will be subject to the same restrictions as the original award and dividends paid in cash may be subject to such restrictions.

 

Restricted Stock Units.    The Compensation Committee may grant restricted stock units under the Amended Equity Plan, which represent rights to receive shares of our common stock at a future date determined in accordance with the participant’s award agreement. No monetary payment is required for receipt of restricted stock units or the shares issued in settlement of the award, the consideration for which is furnished in the form of the participant’s services to the Company. The Compensation Committee may grant restricted stock unit awards subject to the attainment of one or more performance goals similar to those described below in connection with performance awards, or may make the awards subject to vesting conditions similar to those applicable to restricted stock awards. Unless otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, a participant will forfeit any restricted stock units which have not vested prior to the participant’s termination of service. Participants have no voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends with respect to restricted stock unit awards until shares of common stock are issued in settlement of such awards. However, the Compensation Committee may grant restricted stock units that entitle their holders to dividend equivalent rights, which are rights to receive cash or additional restricted stock units whose value is equal to any cash dividends the Company pays.

 

Performance Awards.    The Compensation Committee may grant performance awards subject to such conditions and the attainment of such performance goals over such periods as the Compensation Committee determines in writing and sets forth in a written agreement between the Company and the participant. These awards may be designated as performance shares or performance units, which consist of unfunded bookkeeping entries generally having initial values equal to the fair market value determined on the grant date of a share of common stock in the case of performance shares and a monetary value established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant in the case of performance units. Performance awards will specify a predetermined amount of performance shares or performance units that may be earned by the participant to the extent that one or more performance goals are attained within a predetermined performance period. To the extent earned, performance awards may be settled in cash, shares of common stock (including shares of restricted stock that are subject to additional vesting) or any combination of these.

 

Prior to the beginning of the applicable performance period or such later date as permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Committee will establish one or more performance goals applicable to the award. Performance goals will be based on the attainment of specified target levels with respect to one or more measures of business or financial performance of the Company and each subsidiary corporation consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes, or such division or business unit of the Company as may be selected by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may base performance goals on one or more of the following measures: revenue; sales; expenses; operating income; gross margin; operating margin; earnings before any one or more of: stock-based compensation expense, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; pre-tax profit; net operating income; net income; economic value added; free cash flow; operating cash flow; balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities; stock price; earnings per share; return on stockholder equity; return on capital; return on assets; return on investment; total stockholder return, employee satisfaction; employee retention; market share; customer satisfaction; product development; research and development expense; completion of an identified special project; completion of a joint venture or other corporate transaction and new customer acquisition.

 

The target levels with respect to these performance measures may be expressed on an absolute basis or relative to an index, budget or other standard specified by the Compensation Committee. The degree of

 

36


Table of Contents

attainment of performance measures will be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, if applicable, but prior to the accrual or payment of any performance award for the same performance period, and, according to criteria established by the Compensation Committee, excluding the effect (whether positive or negative) of changes in accounting standards or any extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring item occurring after the establishment of the performance goals applicable to a performance award.

 

Following completion of the applicable performance period, the Compensation Committee will certify in writing the extent to which the applicable performance goals have been attained and the resulting value to be paid to the participant. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to eliminate or reduce, but not increase, the amount that would otherwise be payable on the basis of the performance goals attained to a participant who is a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. However, no such reduction may increase the amount paid to any other participant. The Compensation Committee may make positive or negative adjustments to performance award payments to participants other than covered employees to reflect the participant’s individual job performance or other factors determined by the Compensation Committee. In its discretion, the Compensation Committee may provide for a participant awarded performance shares to receive dividend equivalent rights with respect to cash dividends paid on our common stock to the extent of the performance shares that become nonforfeitable. The Compensation Committee may provide for performance award payments in lump sums or installments.

 

Unless otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, if a participant’s service terminates due to the participant’s death or disability prior to completion of the applicable performance period, the final award value will be determined at the end of the performance period on the basis of the performance goals attained during the entire performance period but will be prorated for the number of months of the participant’s service during the performance period. If a participant’s service terminates prior to completion of the applicable performance period for any other reason, the Amended Equity Plan provides that, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the performance award will be forfeited. No performance award may be sold or transferred other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution prior to the end of the applicable performance period.

 

Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards.    The Compensation Committee may grant cash-based awards or other stock-based awards in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee determines. Cash-based awards will specify a monetary payment or range of payments, while other stock-based awards will specify a number of shares or units based on shares or other equity-related awards. Such awards may be subject to vesting conditions based on continued performance of service or subject to the attainment of one or more performance goals similar to those described above in connection with performance awards. Settlement of awards may be in cash or shares of common stock, as determined by the Compensation Committee. A participant will have no voting rights with respect to any such award unless and until shares are issued pursuant to the award. The Compensation Committee may grant dividend equivalent rights with respect to other stock-based awards. The effect on such awards of the participant’s termination of service will be determined by the Compensation Committee and set forth in the participant’s award agreement.

 

Change in Control.    Unless otherwise defined in a participant’s award or other agreement with the Company, the Amended Equity Plan provides that a “Change in Control” occurs upon (a) a person or entity (with certain exceptions described in the Amended Equity Plan) becoming the direct or indirect beneficial owner of more than 50% of the Company’s voting stock; (b) stockholder approval of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or (c) the occurrence of any of the following events upon which the stockholders of the Company immediately before the event do not retain immediately after the event direct or indirect beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the voting securities of the Company, its successor or the entity to which the assets of the company were transferred: (i) a sale or exchange by the stockholders in a single transaction or series of related transactions of more than 50% of the Company’s voting stock; (ii) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is a party; or (iii) the sale, exchange or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (other than a sale, exchange or transfer to one or more subsidiaries of the Company).

 

37


Table of Contents

The Amended Equity Plan does not provide for any automatic single trigger acceleration upon a Change in Control. Instead, if a Change in Control occurs, the surviving, continuing, successor or purchasing entity or its parent may, without the consent of any participant, either assume or continue outstanding awards or substitute substantially equivalent awards for its stock. If so determined by the Compensation Committee, stock-based awards will be deemed assumed if, for each share subject to the award prior to the Change in Control, its holder is given the right to receive the same amount of consideration that a stockholder would receive as a result of the Change in Control. Any awards which are not assumed or continued in connection with a Change in Control or exercised or settled prior to the Change in Control will terminate effective as of the time of the Change in Control. Subject to the restrictions of Section 409A of the Code, the Compensation Committee may provide for the acceleration of vesting or settlement of any or all outstanding awards upon such terms and to such extent as it determines. The Amended Equity Plan also authorizes the Compensation Committee, in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, to cancel each or any award denominated in shares of stock upon a Change in Control in exchange for a payment to the participant with respect each vested share (and each unvested share if so determined by the Compensation Committee) subject to the cancelled award of an amount equal to the excess of the consideration to be paid per share of common stock in the Change in Control transaction over the exercise price per share, if any, under the award. The vesting of all awards held by non-employee directors will be accelerated in full upon a Change in Control.

 

Awards Subject to Section 409A of the Code.    Certain awards granted under the Amended Equity Plan may be deemed to constitute “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, providing rules regarding the taxation of nonqualified deferred compensation plans, and the regulations and other administrative guidance issued pursuant to Section 409A. Any such awards will be required to comply with the requirements of Section 409A. Notwithstanding any provision of the Amended Equity Plan to the contrary, the Compensation Committee is authorized, in its sole discretion and without the consent of any participant, to amend the Amended Equity Plan or any award agreement as it deems necessary or advisable to comply with Section 409A.

 

Amendment, Suspension or Termination.    The Amended Equity Plan will continue in effect until its termination by the Compensation Committee, provided that no awards may be granted under the Amended Equity Plan following the tenth anniversary of the Amended Equity Plan’s effective date, which will be the date on which it is approved by the stockholders. The Compensation Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Amended Equity Plan at any time, provided that no amendment may be made without stockholder approval that would increase the maximum aggregate number of shares of stock authorized for issuance under the Amended Equity Plan, change the class of persons eligible to receive incentive stock options or require stockholder approval under any applicable law. No amendment, suspension or termination of the Amended Equity Plan may affect any outstanding award unless expressly provided by the Compensation Committee, and, in any event, may not have a materially adverse effect on an outstanding award without the consent of the participant unless necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule, including, but not limited to, Section 409A of the Code.

 

Summary of U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.    The following summary is intended only as a general guide to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of participation in the Amended Equity Plan and does not attempt to describe all possible federal or other tax consequences of such participation or tax consequences based on particular circumstances.

 

Incentive Stock Options.    A participant recognizes no taxable income for regular income tax purposes as a result of the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option qualifying under Section 422 of the Code. Participants who neither dispose of their shares within two years following the date the option was granted nor within one year following the exercise of the option will normally recognize a capital gain or loss upon the sale of the shares equal to the difference, if any, between the sale price and the purchase price of the shares. If a participant satisfies such holding periods upon a sale of the shares, we will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. If a participant disposes of shares within two years after the date of grant or within

 

38


Table of Contents

one year after the date of exercise (a “disqualifying disposition”), the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the option exercise date and the exercise price (not to exceed the gain realized on the sale if the disposition is a transaction with respect to which a loss, if sustained, would be recognized) will be taxed as ordinary income at the time of disposition. Any gain in excess of that amount will be a capital gain. If a loss is recognized, there will be no ordinary income, and such loss will be a capital loss. Any ordinary income recognized by the participant upon the disqualifying disposition of the shares generally should be deductible by us for federal income tax purposes, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

 

In general, the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise of an incentive stock option is treated as an adjustment in computing the participant’s alternative minimum taxable income and may be subject to an alternative minimum tax which is paid if such tax exceeds the regular tax for the year. Special rules may apply with respect to certain subsequent sales of the shares in a disqualifying disposition, certain basis adjustments for purposes of computing the alternative minimum taxable income on a subsequent sale of the shares and certain tax credits which may arise with respect to participants subject to the alternative minimum tax.

 

Nonstatutory Stock Options.    Options not designated or qualifying as incentive stock options are nonstatutory stock options having no special tax status. A participant generally recognizes no taxable income upon receipt of such an option. Upon exercising a nonstatutory stock option, the participant normally recognizes ordinary income equal to the difference between the exercise price paid and the fair market value of the shares on the date when the option is exercised. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of stock acquired by the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date, will be taxed as capital gain or loss. We generally should be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant as a result of the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

 

Stock Appreciation Rights.    A Participant recognizes no taxable income upon the receipt of a stock appreciation right. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the exercise date over the exercise price. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. We generally should be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant in connection with the exercise of the stock appreciation right, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

 

Restricted Stock.    A participant acquiring restricted stock generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the “determination date” over the price paid, if any, for such shares. The “determination date” is the date on which the participant acquires the shares unless the shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and are not transferable, in which case the determination date is the earlier of (i) the date on which the shares become transferable or (ii) the date on which the shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (e.g., when they become vested). If the determination date follows the date on which the participant acquires the shares, the participant may elect, pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code, to designate the date of acquisition as the determination date by filing an election with the Internal Revenue Service no later than 30 days after the date on which the shares are acquired. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of shares acquired pursuant to a restricted stock award, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value of the shares on the determination date, will be taxed as capital gain or loss. We generally should be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant on the determination date, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

 

39


Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Unit, Performance, Cash-Based and Other Stock-Based Awards.    A participant generally will recognize no income upon the grant of a restricted stock unit, performance share, performance unit, cash-based or other stock-based award. Upon the settlement of such awards, participants normally will recognize ordinary income in the year of settlement in an amount equal to the cash received and the fair market value of any substantially vested shares of stock received. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. If the participant receives shares of restricted stock upon settlement, the participant generally will be taxed in the same manner as described above under “Restricted Stock.” Upon the sale of any shares received, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value of the shares on the determination date (as defined above under “Restricted Stock”), will be taxed as capital gain or loss. We generally should be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant on the determination date, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

 

Section 162(m) of the Code.    In general, under Section 162(m) of the Code, income tax deductions of publicly-held corporations may be limited to the extent total compensation (including base salary, annual bonus, stock option exercises and non-qualified benefits) for certain executive officers exceeds $1.0 million (less the amount of any “excess parachute payments” as defined in Section 280G of the Code) in any taxable year of the corporation. However, under Section 162(m) of the Code, the deduction limit does not apply to certain “qualified performance-based compensation.” In order to qualify for the exemption for qualified performance-based compensation, Section 162(m) of the Code generally requires that:

 

   

The compensation be paid solely upon account of the attainment of one or more pre-established objective performance goals;

 

   

The performance goals must be established by a compensation committee comprised of two or more “outside directors;”

 

   

The material terms of the performance goals must be disclosed to and approved by the stockholders; and

 

   

The compensation committee of “outside directors” must certify that the performance goals have indeed been met prior to payment.

 

Pursuant to a special rule under Section 162(m), stock options and SARs will satisfy the “qualified performance-based compensation” exception if (i) the awards are made by a qualifying compensation committee, (ii) the plan sets the maximum number of shares that can be granted to any person within a specified period and (iii) the compensation is based solely on an increase in the stock price after the grant date. The Amended Equity Plan has been designed to permit us to grant stock options and SARs which will are intended to qualify as “qualified performance-based compensation.”

 

Tax Consequences to the Company.    The Company should be entitled to a deduction when a participant has compensation income. Any such deduction will be subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

Required Vote and Board of Directors Recommendation

 

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on this proposal. Votes for, against, abstentions and broker non-votes will each be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions will have the same effect as a negative vote on this proposal. Broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. If you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions on this proposal, your shares will be voted in favor of the proposal.

 

The Board believes that the proposed adoption of the Amended Equity Plan is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the reasons stated above.

 

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2013 PLAN.

 

40


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth, as of September 1, 2016, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by: (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock, (ii) each named executive officer, (iii) each of our directors and director nominees, and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group.

 

Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Extreme Networks, Inc., 145 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134.

 

Name(1)

   Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership(2)
     Percent of
Class(3)
 

Directors:

     

Charles P. Carinalli, Director(4)

     364,969         *   

Randi Paikoff-Feigin, Former Director

     52,015         *   

Edward H. Kennedy, Director(5)

     197,586         *   

Raj Khanna, Director

     51,603         *   

John H. Kispert, Director(6)

     174,086         *   

John C. Shoemaker, Director(7)

     274,086         *   

Kathleen M. Holmgren, Director(10)

     0         *   

Named Executive Officers:

Edward B. Meyercord, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director(8)

     445,669         *   

Kenneth Arola, Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer(9)

     231,256         *   

Benjamin Drew Davies, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

     0         *   

Robert Gault, Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Services, and Channels(10)

     103,340         *   

Katayoun Motiey, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary

     0         *   

Norman Rice, Executive Vice President, Marketing and Corporate Development(11)

     160,147         *   

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (13 persons)

     2,034,757         1.91

5% Owners:

     

Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC(12)

     6,457,966         6.07

725 South Figueroa St. 39th Floor

     

Los Angeles, California 90017

     

BlackRock Inc.(13)

     5,782,811         5.44

55 East 52nd Street

     

New York, NY 10055

     

 

* Less than 1 percent
(1) Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and to the information contained in the footnotes to this table.
(2) Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by the person within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(3) Calculated on the basis of 106,391,651 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 1, 2016, provided that any additional shares of common stock that a stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of September 1, 2016 are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating that stockholder’s percentage of beneficial ownership. These shares are not, however, deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
(4) Includes 90,000 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(5) Includes 40,000 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(6) Includes 30,000 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of September 1, 2016.

 

41


Table of Contents
(7) Includes 100,000 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(8) Includes 195,000 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(9) Includes 145,166 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(10) Includes 45,833 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(11) Includes 66,666 shares issuable pursuant to options within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
(12) Based on information supplied by Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016. Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC. is deemed to have sole voting power for 6,457,966 of these shares, shared voting power of 0 of these shares and sole dispositive power for 6,457,966 of these shares.
(13) Based on information supplied by BlackRock, Inc. in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 1, 2016. BlackRock, Inc. is deemed to have sole voting power for 5,782,811 of these shares, shared voting power of 0 of these shares and sole dispositive power for 5,782,811 of these shares.

 

42


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS

 

2016 Compensation Decisions

 

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, our named executive officers and their respective titles were as follows:

 

Name

  

Title

Edward B. Meyercord

   President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Benjamin Drew Davies(1)

   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Robert Gault

   Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Services and Channels

Katayoun Motiey(2)

   Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary

Norman Rice(3)

   Executive Vice President, Marketing and Corporate Development

Kenneth Arola(4)

   Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

(1) Mr. Davies commenced employment as our EVP, Chief Financial Officer on June 1, 2016.
(2) Ms. Motiey ceased to serve as an executive officer on February 9, 2016, after the Board’s periodic review of those officers that should be designated as an executive officer. Ms. Motiey’s employment with the Company began effective as of November 18, 2015 as Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary. Her scope of responsibility increased and her title changed to Chief Administrative Officer in February 2016.
(3) Mr. Rice ceased to serve as an executive office on February 9, 2016, after the Board’s periodic review of those officers that should be designated as an executive officer.
(4) Mr. Arola ceased to serve as an executive officer of the Company on May 31, 2016, and his employment terminated effective June 30, 2016.

 

Executive Officers

 

Set forth below are the name, age, position of and biographical information about each of the Company’s executive officers, as of the date of this proxy statement.

 

Edward B. Meyercord

 

Mr. Meyercord’s biography is included with the other members of the Board of Directors above.

 

Benjamin Drew Davies

 

Mr. Davies, age 50, joined Extreme in June 2016 and serves as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer starting June 1, 2016. Most recently, Mr. Davies held the position of Vice President, Controller at Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., a publicly traded semiconductor company, from December 2015 until May 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Davies was the Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller at Spansion, Inc., from August 2012 to December 2015. Prior to Spansion, Mr. Davies was corporate controller at Intersil Corporation, a publicly traded semiconductor company, from April 2009 to August 2012, and served as operations controller at Intersil from March 2008 to April 2009. He also served as Chief Financial Officer of Nanoconduction, Inc. from March 2007 to March 2008, and as Director Finance and Administration for STATSChipPac from September 1999 to March 2007. Mr. Davies held various finance roles at Micron Custom Manufacturing Services from November 1992 to September 1999. Mr. Davies has a B.S. in business accounting from the University of Idaho and a M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.

 

Robert Gault

 

Mr. Gault, age 53, joined the Company in December 2014 as Vice President, Worldwide Partner Organization and was promoted to serve as our Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Services and Channels in April 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Gault served as Vice President, Cloud and Managed Services at Cisco Systems, Inc., a publicly traded networking solutions company, from July 2009 to December 2014. Prior to that, he served as Vice President, U.S. Service Provider Channels at Cisco from June 2005 to June

 

43


Table of Contents

2009, and as Operations Director at Cisco from June 2000 to June 2005. Mr. Gault also served as Global Account Manager for Sprint from June 1987 to November 1996. Mr. Gault holds a B.S. degree in business from West Chester University.

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Executive Summary

 

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the objectives and operation of the Company’s executive compensation program in fiscal 2016, particularly with respect to the Company’s NEOs identified below. The Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s compensation programs and has the sole authority to establish the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs.

 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

Our guiding compensation principle in establishing executive compensation is to align compensation with the creation of stockholder value while achieving the Company’s strategic objectives and financial goals. To accomplish these goals, we seek to provide a competitive total compensation package that allows us to attract high quality candidates for senior leadership positions, to retain these employees, and to establish a total compensation program which motivates and rewards individual and team performance in alignment with our long-term business strategies and objectives. Our compensation program is designed to provide accountability at both the individual and team level with respect to both absolute and relative competitive performance. We also align the interests of our executives and our stockholders by providing variable compensation to our executives that is directly linked to the performance of the Company and to our stock price. We believe it is in our stockholders’ interests to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified individuals in critical positions by providing competitive compensation opportunities. We establish market competitive target levels of total compensation, focusing on both short and long-term compensation. Annual compensation for a given executive is determined with reference to competitive market data, as well as the individual’s experience, knowledge, skills, education, performance and importance to the success of our business.

 

Compensation Best Practices

 

The Company’s executive compensation program includes a number of features intended to reflect best practices in the market and to help ensure that the program reinforces stockholder interests. Consistent with our compensation philosophy and best practices in the industry, our executive compensation framework emphasized the following features in fiscal 2016:

 

   

Simple compensation structure.    The compensation program for our NEOs in 2016 consisted primarily of base salary, performance-based cash bonuses under the Company’s Incentive Plan (the “Cash Bonus Plan”), and time and performance-based equity grants.

 

   

Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan payouts tied to financial metrics.    In fiscal 2016, the Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan provided for cash bonuses tied to the achievement of Company non-GAAP operating income targets approved by the Compensation Committee.

 

   

Reasonable time based equity grants.    In fiscal 2016, the Company granted time-based restricted stock units to its NEOs (other than Mr. Meyercord) that vest based on continued service over three years, in order to encourage retention and to tie realizable compensation from such equity grants to the Company’s long term stock price. As Mr. Meyercord had received equity awards in connection with the commencement of his employment on April 19, 2015, near the end of fiscal 2015, he was not provided an annual equity grant during fiscal 2016.

 

   

Performance equity awards.    In fiscal 2016, the Company granted performance-based restricted stock units to its NEOs (other than Ms. Motiey and Mr. Meyercord) that could only be earned if the Company’s stock achieved, or achieves, a pre-designated stock price for 30 consecutive trading days during the applicable performance period.

 

44


Table of Contents
   

No compensation guarantees. The Company does not guarantee to its NEOs continued employment or salary increases, bonuses, pension arrangements, equity grants or deferred compensation arrangements.

 

   

Limited perquisites. The Company provided minimal perquisites to our NEOs. Generally, Company benefits (such as medical and dental insurance, the employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) and the 401(k) plan match) are available to all full-time U.S. employees. In the future all perquisites will be approved by the Compensation Committee.

 

   

Reasonable severance benefits. The Company has an established separation policy that provides a reasonable level of severance benefits for NEOs whose employment is terminated “without cause” or “for good reason” as defined in the policy. This provides consistency and predictability in the Company’s treatment of such executive officers upon termination of employment.

 

   

Mitigation of compensation-related risk. The Company has adopted policies, including an insider trading policy, which policies are subject to oversight by independent Committees of the Board, to mitigate compensation-related risk.

 

   

No hedging transactions, speculative transactions or pledging of securities. In accordance with our insider trading policy, all executive officers and directors, are prohibited from engaging in speculative transactions in Company securities, including engaging in short sales, engaging in transactions with respect to put options, call options or other derivative securities, or engaging in any other forms of hedging transactions. In addition, executive officers and directors may not hold securities of the Company in a margin account, or pledge our securities as collateral for a loan.

 

   

Recoupment or Claw-Back policy. The Company has adopted a recoupment policy, sometimes called a “claw back” policy, which allows the Company to recover incentive based compensation paid to any current or former executive officer under certain circumstances.

 

2015 “Say on Pay” Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

 

The Company provided stockholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation at the 2015 Annual Meeting. During that meeting, approximately 78 percent of the votes cast in the “say on pay” advisory vote were “FOR” approval of our executive compensation. The Committee considered the results of our 2015 advisory vote on executive compensation in determining whether modifications to our executive compensation programs were appropriate. In addition, as a result of the vote last year, we have increased our institutional shareholder outreach efforts and continue to adopt compensation policies that align our executive compensation with shareholder interests.

 

Compensation Process

 

Our Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Board and the Company’s human resources group, designs and oversees the Company’s compensation programs and compensation philosophy. Throughout the year, the Chair of our Compensation Committee meets with our Chief Administrative Officer and other members of our human resources and legal groups to monitor issues relating to executive compensation. At the end of the fiscal year, our Chief Executive Officer conducts a qualitative and quantitative assessment of each senior officer’s performance for the past fiscal year based upon the officer’s individual and corporate goals and objectives, and reports to the Compensation Committee regarding his proposals regarding compensation adjustments for the NEOs (other than with respect to himself). The Compensation Committee independently assesses the performance and compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Executive Officer is not present in meetings when his compensation is discussed. As set forth in additional detail below, in connection with its compensation oversight and approvals, the Compensation Committee reviews:

 

   

the compensation paid to similarly situated executives in comparable companies in our peer group;

 

   

our competitive position relative to comparable companies in our industry; and

 

   

the total compensation budget for the Company.

 

45


Table of Contents

Additional details regarding the operation and duties of the Compensation Committee are also set forth in the “Compensation Committee” section above.

 

Compensation Consultant

 

In connection with our desire to make our executive compensation competitive, to more closely tie future compensation to performance and to further align executive compensation with stockholder value, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, Inc., a national compensation consulting firm with expertise in the technology sector, to assist it in the performance of its duties and to advise it with respect to compensation matters for fiscal 2016. In its role as independent compensation consultant and at the request of the Compensation Committee, Compensia participated in Compensation Committee meetings and provided compensation advice to the Committee on:

 

   

competitiveness of NEO compensation levels as compared to our peer group;

 

   

revisions and additions to the Company’s peer group, goal metrics and bonus design;

 

   

compensation mix between cash and equity; and

 

   

developments in legislation and regulation affecting executive compensation.

 

Although the Company pays Compensia’s fees for its engagement by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee has sole discretion with respect to Compensia’s continued engagement and assignments. Additional details regarding the Compensation Committee’s relationship and review of Compensia are also set forth in the “Compensation Committee” section above.

 

Peer Group Selection and Review

 

The Compensation Committee looks at a variety of factors when setting pay including competitive market data, as well as the individual’s experience, knowledge, skills, education, performance and importance to the success of our business. The Compensation Committee evaluates pay competitiveness on an element-by-element basis, as well as on a total compensation basis. The peer group data reviewed includes a range of pay levels including the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of the members of the peer group to reflect a range of pay to be considered when determining individual pay elements. The Compensation Committee reviews the practices of members of the peer group to better understand and assess the competitiveness of the compensation that the Company pays to its executives, both with respect to each compensation element and the overall compensation package.

 

On October 27, 2014, following consultation with Compensia, the Compensation Committee approved our peer group for fiscal year 2016 compensation decisions. The peer group included the following companies:

 

ADTRAN, Inc.

   Infinera Corporation    Ruckus Wireless, Inc.

Aruba Networks, Inc.

   InterDigital, Inc.    Silicon Graphics International

Black Box Corporation

   Ixia    ShoreTel, Inc.

Calix, Inc.

   NETGEAR, Inc.    Super Micro Computer, Inc.

Emulex Corporation

   QLogic Corporation    TESSCO Technologies, Inc.

Finisar Corporation

   Riverbed Technology Inc.    Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.

Harmonic Inc.

     

 

The peer group for fiscal 2016 was comprised of computer networking and communication equipment companies and other high-tech companies with $300 million to $1.5 billion in revenue and market capitalizations of $250 million to $3.2 billion at the time selected for inclusion in the peer group.

 

46


Table of Contents

Compensation Program Elements

 

The main elements of our compensation program and their respective purposes are as follows:

 

Element

  

Purpose

Base salary

   Attract and retain talented employees. Serves as the primary element of fixed compensation.

Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan

   Encourage and reward individual and overall company performance relative to our current plans and objectives, particularly in the short term.
Annual time and performance-based long-term equity incentives    Promote the achievement of longer-term financial and strategic objectives. Encourage employee retention. Align the interests of executives and stockholders.

Change in control and severance benefits

   Retain executives during the pendency of a proposed change in control transaction. Avoid adverse impacts to the morale of executives and of uncertainty regarding continued employment. Align the interests of executives and stockholders in the event of a change in control. Assist with the recruitment of executives and other key employees.

Benefit plans

   Attract and retain talented employees. Provide health and welfare benefits with assurance of financial support in the event of illness or injury. Encourage retirement savings. Encourage additional equity ownership by employees.

 

47


Table of Contents

Performance Overview

 

Our operations and financial performance during fiscal 2016, achieved the following results:

 

   

Net revenue of $528.4 million compared to net revenue of $552.9 million in fiscal 2015.

 

   

Total gross margin of 51.2% of net revenue compared to 50.6% in fiscal 2015.

 

   

Operating loss of $25.6 million, a decrease of $37.4 million from operating loss of $63.0 million in fiscal 2015.

 

   

Net loss of $31.9 million in fiscal 2016, a decrease of $39.8 million from a net loss of $71.6 million in fiscal 2015.

 

This performance was reflected in the compensation of our NEO’s in a number of ways:

 

   

With the limited exception for Mr. Rice, who was promoted early in fiscal 2016, base salaries for our NEOs were not increased in fiscal year 2016.

 

   

Incentive payments to executives under the Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan, our short-term cash incentive plan with semi-annual payouts, were reasonable in relation to our performance during the fiscal year. The performance target for non-GAAP operating income was exceeded for the first payout due in February 2016, and payout was made at 116.7% for that period. Only 92.5% of the performance target for non-GAAP operating income was achieved for the second payout due in August 2016. Although a 73.3% payout would have been due based upon the Company’s performance against target for the second semi-annual performance period, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to reduce the payout level to 20% of target because the financial performance of the Company was lower than expected. When combined, the two payments were below the annual target level, with the NEOs that were employed for the full fiscal year receiving between 68% and 75% of their total target annual bonus.

 

   

The performance stock units granted to Messrs. Arola, Gault and Rice on August 15, 2015 were earned on December 11, 2015, the 30th consecutive trading day with the closing trading price of our common stock exceeding $3.50 per share (which represented a 19.5% increase in price over the closing trading price of our common stock on the day prior to the date of grant), triggering the immediate vesting of 1/3 of the performance stock units, with the remaining performance stock units vesting in equal installments on August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2018, subject to continued service of our NEOs through the vesting date.

 

   

A total of 1/3 of the performance-based stock options granted to Mr. Meyercord in connection with the commencement of his employment on April 19, 2015 were earned on December 11, 2015, the 30th consecutive trading day following the closing trading price of our common stock exceeding $3.50 per share, causing that portion of the options to commence monthly vesting over a period of 24 months, subject to Mr. Meyercord’s continued employment (the remaining options have higher stock price thresholds that have not yet been met).

 

Base Salaries

 

The base salary for each NEO initially is set at the time the NEO commences employment with the Company, and is reviewed annually. The base salaries for Ms. Motiey and Mr. Davies were determined by the Compensation Committee, after consultation with Compensia and after recommendation by the Chief Executive Officer after his arms-length negotiations with those individuals to induce them to join the Company.

 

In its annual review of NEO base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, the performance of each NEO (as evaluated by the Chief Executive Officer, except with respect to his own performance), and data provided by Compensia from the Company’s peer group with respect to base salary, total target cash compensation and total direct compensation (which includes equity awards).

 

48


Table of Contents

Our Compensation Committee determined not to provide continuing NEOs, other than Mr. Rice, who was promoted, with base salary increases during fiscal 2016 in light of our financial performance. In connection with his promotion on August 16, 2015, Mr. Rice received an 8.33 percent increase in annual base salary to $325,000.

 

The base salaries for the NEOs for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, as applicable, were as follows:

 

Named Executive Officer

   FY 2016 Base  Salary
Annualized
     FY 2015 Base  Salary
Annualized
     Percentage Increase
if  applicable
 

Edward B. Meyercord

   $ 600,000       $ 600,000         0

Benjamin Drew Davies

   $ 350,000         —           —     

Robert Gault

   $ 345,000       $ 345,000         0

Katayoun Motiey

   $ 340,000         —           —     

Norman Rice

   $ 325,000       $ 300,000         8.33

Kenneth Arola

   $ 370,008       $ 370,008         0

 

For additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s decisions with respect to NEO base salaries, including a summary of any applicable separation arrangements, see the discussion below under the heading “Summary of Employment and Other Agreements.”

 

Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan—Annual Short-Term Cash Incentives

 

Our Compensation Committee establishes a cash incentive plan each year under our Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan, which is applicable to our employees (other than sales personnel on commission), including the NEOs. The Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan is designed to reward individual and overall Company performance relative to our current plans and objectives, particularly in the short term. The structure and elements of the plan are reviewed and modified annually based upon expectations for our business derived from our annual operating plan. The Compensation Committee does not adhere to a strict formula in determining performance goals. Instead, considering peer group data and the Company’s recent and anticipated performance, the Compensation Committee employs a flexible approach that enables it to choose performance metrics that are designed to allow the Company to adjust to evolving market conditions.

 

The Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan for fiscal 2016 approved by the Compensation Committee provided for semi-annual payouts, which were funded and earned based on the achievement of a pre-established non-GAAP operating income goals and our Compensation Committee’s assessment of overall individual performance. The Committee adopted semi-annual bonus targets after considering the volatility of the industry and the Company’s business because this timing provided the Committee with the ability to adjust the targets mid-year, if necessary. The mix between corporate and individual components for the NEOs was 80% non-GAAP operating income performance and 20% individual performance. No awards would be earned unless the semi-annual non-GAAP operating income goals were achieved at a minimum 85% of target level, at which point bonuses were to be paid at 50% of target for the non-GAAP operating income component. For non-GAAP operating income target performance exceeding 100%, bonuses would be paid at 100% up to 150% for Company performance exceeding the non-GAAP operating income target. The semi-annual targets for the Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan disclosed in the table below were based on projections of non-GAAP operating income derived from the Company’s annual operating plan. Non-GAAP operating income constitutes operating income, calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), but excluding the impact of share-based compensation, acquisition and integration costs, purchase accounting adjustments, amortization of acquired intangibles, restructuring charges, litigation expenses, executive severance costs and overhead adjustments. The Compensation Committee believed that the adjustments to operating income used in calculating this metric are appropriate because the charges and adjustments are not items that can be influenced by most of the Company’s employees and such charges and adjustments may have multi-year impacts.

 

49


Table of Contents

The semi-annual Company performance period goals for fiscal 2016 and the results achieved are as follows:

 

Time Period

   Non-GAAP
Operating
Income
Target
($000)
     Non-GAAP
Operating
Income
Results
Pre-Bonus
Expense
($000)
     Percent
Attainment
Individual

Component
(%)(1)
    Percent
Attainment
Corporate
Component
(%)
    Percent
Payout

Based on
Results(%)
    Actual
Payout
Received(%)
 

1st half

     24,100         28,100         116.7-159.3     116.7     116.7-129.8     116.7-129.8

2nd half

     20,600         17,400         100%        92.5     73.3%        20%   

 

(1) Except for Mr. Rice, individual performance for the first payout was credited at 116.7% (which was the level of the attainment at the corporate level) and was not based on the attainment of individual goals. Mr. Rice was credited at 159.3% on his individual performance component due to his contributions to certain strategic contracts during the first six months of the fiscal year. Individual performance for the second payout was credited at 100% for each NEO and was not based on the attainment of individual goals, but rather determined based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of each NEOs overall performance.

 

The table below reflects the incentive compensation paid to each of the NEOs in fiscal 2016, as well as the bonus targets (as a percentage of base salary) for each NEO. We believe the “at risk” portion of the NEO’s compensation package, such as the short term incentives, should increase with the ability to affect Company performance, the role of the NEO and other market factors. This philosophy is reflected in the “bonus as a percent of base salary” that was approved by the Compensation Committee and is set forth below.

 

Named

Executive Officer

  Annual
Compensation

Rate
    Bonus
as a
Percent
of
Base
Salary

(%)
    1st half
Performance
Factor
    Short Term
Incentive
Compensation

Paid
February
2016
    2nd Half
Performance
Factor
    Short Term
Incentive
Compensation
paid August
2016
    Total
Compensation
From Short
Term
Incentive Plan
in FY16
 

Edward B. Meyercord

  $ 600,000        120        116.7   $ 417,600        20   $ 72,000      $ 489,600   

Robert Gault

  $ 345,000        100        116.7   $ 200,100        20   $ 34,500      $ 234,600   

Benjamin Drew Davies(1)

  $ 350,000        60        —        $ —          20   $ 3,500      $ 3,500   

Katayoun Motiey(2)

  $ 340,000        55        116.7   $ 18,077        20   $ 18,700      $ 36,777   

Norman Rice

  $ 325,000        85        129.8   $ 179,225        20   $ 27,625      $ 276,250   

Kenneth Arola

  $ 370,008        70        116.7   $ 150,224        20   $ 25,901      $ 176,125   

 

(1) Prorated 2nd half payout due to the commencement of Mr. Davies’ employment with the Company beginning June 1, 2016.
(2) Prorated 1st half payout due to the commencement of Ms. Motiey’s employment with the Company beginning November 18, 2015.

 

As shown by the tables above, the performance target for non-GAAP operating income was exceeded for the first payout due in February 2016, and payout was made at 116.7% for that period. The performance target for non-GAAP operating income was not met for the second payout due in August 2016, although the Company’s non-GAAP operating income did achieve 92.5% of the target for that six month period. Although a 73.3% payout would have been due based upon the Company’s achievement of the performance target for the second semi-annual performance period, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to reduce the payout level to 20% of target because the financial performance of the Company was lower than expected.

 

A GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation for operating income for fiscal years 2015 and 2016 is attached as Exhibit B to this proxy statement.

 

50


Table of Contents

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

 

We provide equity awards under the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) to our NEOs in order to promote the achievement of longer-term financial and strategic objectives, to encourage employee retention and to align the interests of our officers and of our stockholders. As appropriate, these awards may include both time-based equity awards, which are tied to retention of the executive with the Company, and performance-based equity awards, which in fiscal 2016 were tied to Company performance in meeting certain objectives with respect to its share price. In fiscal 2016, the Company awarded time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”). In addition, certain performance-based restricted stock units (“MSUs”) awarded under the 2013 Plan to designated NEOs in fiscal 2015 became earned and vested in fiscal 2016. Each RSU and PSU represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock and each MSU represents the right to receive up to 1.5 shares of the Company’s common stock, in each case, subject to the fulfillment of the vesting conditions attached to the award. From time to time, the Company may also award stock options, as it did with respect to the performance-based stock option granted to Mr. Meyercord in fiscal 2015, which is discussed under “Agreements with our President and Chief Executive Officer.”

 

Our RSUs generally vest over three years (other than the initial RSU grant to our Chief Executive Officer, which vests over four years), subject to continued service to the Company. We believe that they are an effective retention and compensatory tool because they retain value even during a challenging economic environment, while still providing an incentive to enhance stockholder value since they become more valuable when the market price of our stock increases.

 

Our PSUs are earned based upon the Company’s attainment of a target stock price over a sustained period of time (generally 30 days). Once earned, the PSUs are subject to a three year vesting schedule and, like RSUs, require continued service to the Company.

 

The MSUs are earned and vest based upon the Company’s share performance as compared to the NASDAQ Composite Index during the applicable performance period. The performance calculation to determine the number of shares to be issued upon vesting of the MSUs is based on the percentage increase or decrease in (i) the average adjusted closing price per share of our common stock for the last sixty market trading days prior to the commencement of a Performance Period over (ii) the average adjusted closing price of our common stock for the last sixty market trading days prior to each of three annual vesting dates post-grant (the “Company’s Performance”) as compared to the percentage increase or decrease in the adjusted value of the Index over the same periods (the “Index Performance”), with 100 percent of the target shares awarded for equal Company Performance versus Index Performance for any Performance Period and a linear 2-to-1 scaling above target and 3-to-1 scaling below target. i.e., the number of shares earned will increase by 2 percent of target for each 1 percent of positive Company Performance as compared to Index Performance, capped at 150 percent, and will decrease by 3 percent for each 1 percent of negative Company Performance as compared to Index Performance.

 

There are three Performance Periods under the MSUs awarded in fiscal 2015, each commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. On December 31, 2017, up to the maximum 150 percent of the total target number of target shares can be earned, offset by any shares earned based on results during the previously completed 1-year and 2-year Performance Periods. 0% to 150% of one-third of the target shares could be earned in each of the periods ending December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016.

 

Upon the completion of the 1-year Performance Period on December 31, 2015, our Compensation Committee certified performance achievement of 100.5% based on Company Performance versus Index Performance, and, as a result, 12,077 shares underlying MSUs were issued to Mr. Arola and 4,477 shares underlying MSUs were issued to Mr. Rice. Mr. Arola forfeited the remainder of his MSUs when he terminated employment on June 30, 2016. Mr. Rice continues to hold 8,900 MSUs that are subject to ongoing Performance Periods.

 

51


Table of Contents

New Hire Awards

 

Generally, we grant equity awards to our new employees, including our NEOs, in connection with the commencement of their employment to induce them to join us and to tie their long term compensation to future increases in our stock price. The type of grants, the aggregate amounts, and the vesting terms of the new-hire grants to NEOs are negotiated by our Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee with the NEOs, and reviewed and approved by our Compensation Committee in consideration of such NEOs ability to influence Company performance and such NEOs prior experience. Our new hire awards typically are larger than the annual awards made to executives during their continued period of employment.

 

The following table sets forth information on new hire grants to NEOs in fiscal 2016:

 

Named Executive Officer

   Equity Award
Grant Date
   Number of Shares
Subject  to PSU
Grant
     Number of Shares
Subject  to RSU
Grant
 

Benjamin Drew Davies(1)

   June 1, 2016      100,000         100,000   

Katayoun Motiey(2)

   December 15, 2015      0         280,000   

 

(1) In connection with the commencement of his employment, Mr. Davies was granted 100,000 RSUs (1/3 of the RSUs vest on the first anniversary of the grant date, and quarterly thereafter for the next 2 years) and 100,000 PSUs that will be earned if the performance target is met or exceeded. Once the performance target is met and the PSUs are earned, the PSUs will vest on the same schedule as the RSUs. (To the extent any RSUs have vested prior to the PSUs becoming earned, an equal amount of PSUs will immediately be vested when the target is met. If the PSUs are earned before the RSUs commence vesting, no PSU vesting shall occur until the RSUs commence vesting.) The performance target for the PSUs is that the Company’s stock price meet or exceed $5.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days.
(2) In connection with the commencement of her employment, Ms. Motiey was granted 280,000 RSUs (1/3 of the RSUs vest on each of the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date).

 

Annual Awards

 

We typically grant our NEOs equity awards on an annual basis, with the goal of more closely aligning the interests of management and our stockholders by providing continued incentives to our NEOs in order to retain strong executives and improve corporate performance. Awards to NEOs other than the Chief Executive Officer, including both the size and type of the award, are recommended to the Compensation Committee by our Chief Executive Officer. Compensia provides peer group data and analysis in connection with this annual review and advises the Compensation Committee in connection with its review. Compensia also advises the Compensation Committee on the size and type of the award to be granted to our Chief Executive Officer.

 

In August 2015, the Compensation Committee approved grants of RSUs and PSUs for Messrs. Arola, Gault and Rice. As Mr. Meyercord had recently received equity awards in connection with the commencement of his employment, he was not provided an annual grant during fiscal 2016. Mr. Davies and Ms. Motiey had not joined the Company at the time of the annual grants and instead received the new hire grants discussed above. The RSUs awarded to Messrs. Arola, Gault and Rice vest over 3 years, with 1/3 of the shares vesting on the annual anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment. On August 15, 2016, the first 1/3 of the shares covered by the RSUs vested. The PSUs granted to Messrs. Arola, Gault and Rice become earned based upon the achievement of thirty consecutive trading days on which the closing trading price of our common stock equals or exceeds $3.50 per share, representing a 19.5% increase over the closing trading price of $2.93 of our common stock on the day prior to the date of grant. When these PSUs are earned they immediately vest in respect to 1/3rd of the shares and the remainder vest in two equal installments on each of August 15, 2017 and 2018, subject to continued service through the vesting date. If the PSUs were not earned by February 15, 2017, they would automatically forfeit.

 

52


Table of Contents

On December 11, 2015 our common stock closed for the 30th consecutive day with a closing trading price above $3.50, and 1/3rd of the PSUs held by Messrs. Arola, Gault and Rice vested and 1/3rd of the performance-based stock options granted to Mr. Meyercord in fiscal 2015 became earned. Mr. Arola forfeited his remaining PSUs when his employment terminated on June 30, 2016. The remaining shares covered by the PSUs held by Messrs. Gault and Rice vest in equal installments on each of August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2018, subject to continued employment. The portion of Mr. Meyercord’s performance-based stock options that became earned vests in 24 equal monthly installments based on Mr. Meyercord’s continued employment. The remaining performance-based stock options held by Mr. Meyercord remain subject to the achievement of a per share closing trading price for 30 consecutive trading days of $4.50 and $5.50, as well as continued employment after achievement. The remaining targets for Mr. Meyercord have not yet been met.

 

The following table sets forth information on the grants of equity awards made to Messrs. Arola, Rice and Gault in fiscal 2016:

 

Executive

   Equity Award
Grant Date
   Number of Shares
Subject to RSU
Grant
     Number of Shares
Subject to PSU
Grant
 

Kenneth Arola

   August 15, 2015      60,000      
   August 15, 2015         60,000   

Norman Rice

   August 15, 2015      60,000      
   August 15, 2015         60,000   

Robert Gault

   August 15, 2015      80,000      
   August 15, 2015         80,000   

 

Review of Available Shares

 

We monitor the number of shares that we utilize for all of our equity compensation programs, including new hire grants, promotional grants and annual grants, in order to prudently manage compensation expense and potential dilution of stockholder ownership. For more information on our 2013 Plan and our share usage under the 2013 Plan, see Proposal Number 5.

 

Change in Control and Severance Agreements

 

Each of our NEOs is employed at-will. However, from time to time, we implement plans or enter into agreements that would provide benefits payable to certain employees, including the NEOs, in connection with the termination of their employment without cause, or resulting from a change in control or other situations. These benefits assist us in our recruiting efforts and are competitive compared to our peer group. Additionally, without change in control benefits, NEOs may be distracted by the transaction process or may terminate their employment prior to the closing of the change in control, particularly if they do not wish to remain with, or believe they will not be retained by, the remaining entity after the transaction closes. Such departures could jeopardize the consummation of a potential transaction or our interests should the transaction not close. The Compensation Committee believes that these benefits therefore serve to enhance stockholder value, and align the NEOs’ interest with those of our stockholder.

 

Our agreements with NEOs are described under “Summary of Employment and Other Agreements” below. The potential payments that each NEO would have received if a change in control or termination of employment had occurred on June 30, 2016, are set forth under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

 

53


Table of Contents

Other Benefits

 

Perquisites.     Generally, the Company does not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our executive officers, including the NEOs, except in situations where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual in the performance of his or her duties, to make our executive officers more efficient and effective, and for recruitment and retention purposes.

 

During fiscal 2016, the Company paid for spousal travel and personal expenses for Messrs. Meyercord and Gault, in connection with an annual award trip to recognize top sales performers, as well as other Company events where spouses were invited for all participants. We also provided our NEOs with one of our newly introduced products, which has a value of $258, without cost, so that they could better understand our technology and to provide feedback on such product to our engineering team. Since we do not maintain an office near Mr. Meyercord’s residence, we paid for annual dues at a local business club, to provide him access to a suitable facility to meet with customers, vendors and other business partners. The Company bought a nominal holiday gift for our Chief Executive Officer and provided the appropriate tax gross up on the dollar value of the gift.

 

Other Personal Benefits.     We do not provide a fixed vacation allowance for NEOs and other senior level employees, as they may be required to travel extensively and are required to be available to us even while vacationing. We provide our NEOs who joined the Company before May 4, 2016 with a special benefit in the event of their death or disability which includes a cash payout, full vesting of any outstanding RSU awards, and accelerated vesting of their MSUs (at this time only Mr. Rice has an outstanding MSU grant) with the number of shares vesting under the MSU determined as if such person were terminated in connection with a change in control. See “Summary of Employment and Other Agreements” for more information on this death and disability benefit. We provided our NEOs in fiscal 2016 (other than Mr. Davies) with an executive disability insurance top-up program, which provides additional disability benefits to such NEO in addition to the Company’s basic long-term disability plan. This additional benefit is intended to make sure that the income provided to an NEO in the event of their disability is representative of their pre-disability earnings at the same percentage as other employees. We do not provide a defined benefit retirement pension plan, deferred compensation plan, or the use of company vehicles to our NEOs.

 

We provide other customary benefits to our NEOs that we provide to all of our full-time U.S. based employees. Those benefits include: medical, dental, vision and prescription drug insurance coverage; flexible spending contribution plan; disability insurance; life insurance; business travel insurance; 401(k) savings plan with employer match up to a predetermined percentage; educational assistance; employee assistance program; employee stock purchase plan (ESPP); and paid holidays.

 

All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be subject to review and approval by our compensation committee.

 

See the Summary Compensation Table for more information on the benefits described above.

 

Tax Considerations

 

The Compensation Committee has considered the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and related Treasury Department regulations, which restrict deductibility of executive compensation paid to certain of our NEOs holding office at the end of any year to the extent such compensation exceeds $1,000,000 for any of these officers and does not qualify for an exception under the statute or regulations. Options, PSUs and MSUs granted under our 2013 Plan may qualify for an exemption from these restrictions, provided that they are granted by a committee whose members are “outside directors” (as defined by Section 162(m)) and meet other requirement of the tax rules. We expect that the Compensation Committee will continue to be comprised solely of outside directors, and that certain types of equity granted to our NEOs will be approved by the Compensation Committee. Other components of our executive compensation program may not qualify for exemptions from Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee expects to continue evaluating the advisability of qualifying our

 

54


Table of Contents

executive compensation for deductibility. The Compensation Committee’s policy is to consider deductibility of executive compensation under applicable tax laws, but the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award compensation that will not be deductible when it determines appropriate in light of the Company’s compensation goals and objectives.

 

Compensation Risk Evaluation

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed compensation-related risks and does not believe the Company’s compensation programs encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking or create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company for the following reasons:

 

   

The base salary and cash bonus components of the compensation program are designed to provide income independent of the Company’s stock price performance so that employees will not focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics.

 

   

The cash bonus and equity components of compensation are designed to reward both short- and long-term company performance, which discourages employees from taking actions that focus solely on the short-term success of the Company.

 

   

Because operating income performance was used for determining cash bonus payments in fiscal year 2016, executives and other employees were encouraged to take a balanced approach that focuses on generating corporate revenue while taking into account operating expenses.

 

   

The Company’s operating income performance target is applicable to executives and employees (other than sales employees) alike, regardless of functional group.

 

   

The Company caps the performance-based incentives (cash bonus and PSUs/MSUs) for the executives at 150% of target, which discourages excessive risk taking.

 

   

The Company caps the cash incentive award for the Sales Commission Plan at 200%, which provides substantial incentive for the sales force to meet and exceed their objectives. However, senior executives, including our named executive officers, do not participate in the Sales Commission Plan and are thus limited to the Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan payouts so they are incentivized to balance both revenue and profitability, which discourages excessive risk taking by our executives.

 

   

As part of the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, the Company prohibits hedging, speculative transactions and pledging transactions involving its stock so executives and other employees of the Company cannot insulate themselves from the effects of poor stock price performance.

 

   

Executives and other employees are entitled to reasonable severance benefits that are in line with benefits provided by other public companies.

 

   

The Company has adopted a claw-back policy that under certain circumstances allows it to recover incentive based compensation paid to current and former executives.

 

Hedging and Pledging

 

Under our insider trading policy, we prohibit certain employees deemed to be insiders under the policy, including all executive officers and directors from hedging the economic risk of ownership of our stock. In addition, employees and directors may not hold our stock in a margin account, or pledge our stock securities as collateral.

 

Recoupment Policy or Claw-Back Policy

 

The Compensation Committee has adopted the Extreme Networks, Inc. Recoupment Policy that applies to all of our current and former executive officers within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act. Under this policy, in the event of a restatement of financial results (other than a voluntary restatement due to a change in

 

55


Table of Contents

applicable accounting rules or interpretations) due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the U.S. federal securities laws due to fraud during the one-year period following the date of the first public issuance or filing with the SEC (whichever first occurs), the Compensation Committee will have the right to use reasonable efforts to recover any incentive-based compensation in excess of the amount of such incentive based compensation that would have been earned and paid to the executive officer under the restated financial results. “Incentive based compensation” includes (a) cash-based and share-based compensation earned or paid after October 1, 2013, the earning or vesting of which was based on the attainment of a financial measure affected by the restatement of financial results and (b) any profits realized from the sale of securities of the Company during the recovery period.

 

The Compensation Committee will have the discretion to determine the manner in which a clawback or recovery of excess incentive based compensation will be effected, for example, by reducing the future payment of excess incentive based compensation earned on the basis of an erroneous financial measure but not yet paid or by reducing payment of other future compensation to offset excess incentive-based compensation previously paid. The Compensation Committee will amend the policy, as necessary, to comply with the final SEC rules regarding the recoupment policies of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth information for fiscal 2016 concerning the compensation of our named executive officers:

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and Principal Position

  Year     Salary
($)
    Bonus(5)
($)
    Stock
Awards(6)

($)
    Option
Awards

($)(6)
    Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(7)
($)
    All Other
Compensation
($)(8)
    Total
($)
 

Edward B. Meyercord

    2016        600,000        125,000        0        0        489,600        20,873        1,235,473   
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director     2015        120,768        0        1,129,500        719,867        0        3,819        2,098,954   

Kenneth Arola(1)

    2016        370,008        0        299,400        0        150,224        422,291        1,241,923   

Former Executive Vice

    2015        370,000        0        768,636        673,618        64,750        18,450        1,895,454   
President and Chief Financial Officer     2014        30,834        0        0        0        0        0        30,834   

Benjamin Drew Davies(2)

    2016        29,167        0        663,000        0        3,500        183        695,850   
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                

Robert Gault

    2016        345,000        0        399,200        0        234,600        13,399        992,199   
Executive Vice President, Sales, Service and Channels     2015        160,048        50,000        200,800        102,620        158,245        10,831        682,544   

Katayoun Motiey(3)

    2016        210,102        0        1,122,800        0        36,777        2,308        1,371,987   
Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary                

Norman Rice(4)

    2016        321,875        0        299,400        0        262,571        2,749        886,595   
Executive Vice President Marketing and Corporate Development     2015        300,000        0        58,963        0        338,092        20,380        717,435   

 

56


Table of Contents

 

(1) Mr. Arola ceased to serve as an executive officer of the Company on May 31, 2016, and his employment terminated effective June 30, 2016.
(2) Mr. Davies commenced employment as our Chief Financial Officer on June 1, 2016.
(3) Ms. Motiey commenced employment with the Company effective November 18, 2015 and ceased to serve as an executive officer on February 9, 2016, but continues to be employed by our company.
(4) Mr. Rice ceased to serve as an executive office on February 9, 2016, but continues to be employed by our company.
(5) For Mr. Meyercord, this amount represents the sign on bonus he received in August 2015 as part of our agreement with him upon assuming the CEO role.
(6) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, and do not reflect whether our named executive officers actually realized a financial benefit from the award. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the value of the awards, refer to Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.

 

For the PSUs awarded in fiscal year 2016, the amount reported represents the grant date fair value based upon the probable outcome of the performance goals. The table below sets forth the grant date fair value determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718 principles established for the performance-related component of these PSUs based upon the probable and the maximum possible outcome of the performance-related component as of the grant date. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for more details about the PSUs.

 

Name

   Probable Outcome of
Performance Conditions
Grant Date Fair Value ($)
     Maximum Outcome of
Performance Conditions
Grant Date Fair Value  ($)
 

Edward B. Meyercord

     0         0   

Kenneth Arola

     120,600         178,800   

Benjamin Drew Davies

     287,000         376,000   

Robert Gault

     160,800         238,400   

Katayoun Motiey

     0         0   

Norman Rice

     120,600         178,800   

 

(7) Amounts in this column represent payments made to the relevant NEO under the Company’s fiscal year 2016 Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan. In addition, the amount for Mr. Rice includes $18,221 paid under the sales commission plan during August of fiscal year 2016.
(8) All Other Compensation for all NEOs consisted of matching 401K contributions by the Company. All Other Compensation for Mr. Meyercord is also comprised of: company products, $258; spousal travel, $10,677; tax gross up for holiday gift, $1,038; dues for meeting space at business club, $1,000; and premiums for executive top-up disability plan, $4,587. All Other Compensation for Mr. Arola also consisted of the following pursuant to the terms and conditions of his Severance Agreement (as defined below): (i) $390,000 to be paid on or around January 1, 2017, (ii) bonus compensation for the 2nd half payout of fiscal year 2016, if and to the extent earned as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board (which amount earned was $25,901) and (iii) reimbursement of COBRA premiums for 2 months. In addition, all Other Compensation for Mr. Arola is also comprised of: company products, $258; and premiums for executive top-up disability plan, $2,522. All Other Compensation for Mr. Gault is also comprised of: company products, $258; spousal travel, $7,648; and premiums for executive top-up disability plan, $2,181.

 

Summary of Employment and Other Agreements

 

Agreements with our President and Chief Executive Officer

 

In April 2015, we entered into an offer letter of employment with Mr. Meyercord for service as our President and Chief Executive Officer, which we amended and restated on August 31, 2016. Pursuant to the offer

 

57


Table of Contents

letter of employment, Mr. Meyercord is to receive an annual salary of $600,000, and is eligible to participate in our standard employee benefits plans, including, commencing in fiscal 2016, our Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan with an annual target equal to 120 percent of his annual base salary. In addition, in April 2015, Mr. Meyercord was granted 450,000 RSUs that vest over four years based on his continued service and an option to acquire 900,000 shares of our common stock subject to certain performance thresholds. Mr. Meyercord was also awarded a sign-on bonus in the amount of $125,000, less applicable withholdings and deductions, which was paid in a lump sum in August 2015, when other Company employee bonuses were paid.

 

Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Meyercord’s offer letter, Mr. Meyercord is entitled to receive certain severance benefits in the event of a termination of his employment in certain situations. The receipt of these severance benefits is subject to Mr. Meyercord’s timely execution and delivery of a general release of claims in the prescribed form.

 

In the event of a termination other than for cause and which is not in connection with a change in control of the Company, Mr. Meyercord is entitled to receive a severance payment equal to 12 months of his then base salary, together with a pro-rated portion of his annual cash bonus at the established target, provided that the Board-approved Company performance targets were achieved in the quarter immediately preceding the termination. In addition, the vesting of any then outstanding equity awards, including shares subject to the performance awards that have satisfied their performance targets but have not satisfied their time-based components (but excluding unearned shares subject to performance awards where the performance targets have not yet been satisfied, unless otherwise set forth in the applicable grant agreement), will be accelerated by 12 months, and the Company will pay his premiums for COBRA coverage for a period of up to 12 months.

 

In the event of his death or permanent disability, Mr. Meyercord or his heirs will be entitled to receive (in addition to any other benefits to which they are entitled): (i) a cash severance payment of 12 months of salary or, should the termination occur during the Change in Control Period (as defined below under the Company’s Executive Change in Control Severance Plan description), that amount which would have been due as a consequence of termination of his employment due to a change in control (which is 24 months of base salary and 200% of his target bonus); (ii) the acceleration of vesting of all then outstanding equity awards, including shares subject to the performance awards that have satisfied their performance targets but have not satisfied their time-based components (but excluding unearned shares subject to performance awards where the performance targets have not yet been satisfied, unless otherwise set forth in the applicable grant agreement); and (iii) the acceleration of vesting of a certain number of shares under any MSU granted to the Mr. Meyercord prior to the Event. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, Mr. Meyercord has not been awarded any MSUs.

 

Mr. Meyercord’s offer letter also provides for the following severance benefits in the event of the termination of his employment other than for “cause” or with “good reason” within a Change in Control Period (the definitions of such terms are provided in his offer letter and are substantially similar to those in the Executive Change in Control Severance Plan discussed below): (i) a cash severance payment of 24 months of base salary; (ii) a payment of 200% of his target bonus; (iii) the acceleration of vesting of all then outstanding equity awards, including shares subject to the performance awards that have satisfied their performance targets but have not satisfied their time-based components (but excluding unearned shares subject to performance awards where the performance targets have not yet been satisfied, unless otherwise set forth in the applicable grant agreement); (iv) the Company’s payment of his COBRA premiums for two months; and (v) the provision of outplacement services for one month.

 

The calculation of potential payments to Mr. Meyercord upon termination other than for cause or upon change in control is provided in the table under the heading Estimated Payments upon Termination Without Cause or Upon Change in Control.

 

Severance Agreement with Mr. Arola

 

In connection with his resignation of employment effective June 30, 2016 (although he ceased serving as an executive officer as of May 31, 2016), Mr. Arola entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release of

 

58


Table of Contents

Claims (the “Severance Agreement”), under which, in exchange for his general release of claims against the Company, he received or will receive: (i) a lump sum cash payment of $390,000 to be paid on or around January 1, 2017, (ii) reimbursement of COBRA premiums for 2 months, (iii) bonus compensation for the 2nd half payout of fiscal year 2016, if and to the extent earned as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board (which amount earned was $25,901), and (iv) accelerated vesting of each equity award then held by Mr. Arola that would have vested had he continued to be employed with the Company through August 31, 2016, which consisted of options to purchase 5,583 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $5.21 and 20,400 RSUs.

 

Agreements with other NEOs

 

Extreme entered into employment offer letters with the NEOs (other than our CEO) setting forth their initial salary and target bonus opportunity and entitling them to benefits and, subject to Board approval, certain initial equity awards. Mr. Arola’s offer letter was superseded by his Severance Agreement in May 2016. In addition, the NEOs are entitled to certain change in control benefits, death and disability severance benefits and general severance benefits as described below.

 

Executive Change in Control Plan

 

On February 8, 2006, the independent members of our Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the terms of an Executive Change in Control Severance Plan in order to ensure retention of key personnel and continuity of the business in the event of a change in control of the Company, which was most recently amended in June 2016. We refer to this plan, as amended and restated, as the “CiC Plan.”

 

For purposes of the benefits available under the CiC Plan and the Executive Death and Disability Benefits and Executive Severance Policy, discussed below, a Change in Control is deemed to occur upon any of the following:

 

   

any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities of the Company under an employee benefit plan of the Company, becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors;

 

   

the Company is party to a merger or consolidation which results in the holders of the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto failing to retain immediately after such merger or consolidation direct or indirect beneficial ownership of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the Company or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation;

 

   

the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or consummation of any transaction having similar effect (other than a sale or disposition to one or more subsidiaries of the Company); or

 

   

a change in the composition of the Board within any twelve (12) month period as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors (as defined in the CiC Plan); provided, however, that to the extent that any amount constituting nonqualified deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code would become payable under this Plan by reason of a Change in Control, such amount shall become payable only if the event constituting a Change in Control would also constitute a change in ownership or effective control of the Company, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company, within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.

 

59


Table of Contents

Mr. Meyercord receives the severance benefits under his offer letter described above and is not a participant in the CiC Plan. The receipt of severance benefits under the CiC Plan is subject to the participant’s execution and delivery of a general release of claims in the prescribed form.

 

Cash Compensation and Benefits

 

Under the CiC Plan, severance benefits, health insurance and outplacement services are provided to a CiC Plan participant if the participant is terminated without “Cause” or resigns for “Good Reason” (each as defined in the CiC Plan), during the period commencing three months prior to a Change in Control and ending 12 months after a Change in Control (the “Change in Control Period”). The amount of severance compensation that would be provided to a participant is equal to that participant’s then current base salary for a designated period, as well as a percentage of the participant’s cash bonus at target. Under the CiC Plan, executive vice presidents (including our NEOs except for Mr. Meyercord) are eligible to receive 13 months of base salary. Under the CiC Plan, executive vice presidents (including our NEOs except for Mr. Meyercord) are eligible to receive 100% of target bonus. In addition, the Company will provide to the participant and his or her dependents two months of substantially similar health insurance benefits and at the same premium cost to the participant as in effect on the date of termination. The Company will also make available outplacement support for a period of one month.

 

Equity Awards

 

The CiC Plan provides that, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, the vesting, exercisability and settlement of equity awards held by participants that are time-based vesting and are not assumed or otherwise continued by an acquirer, shall be accelerated by crediting the participant with additional service immediately prior to (and contingent upon) the Change in Control. The number of month’s service that will be credited is 13 months for executive vice presidents (including our NEOs except for Mr. Meyercord). Any performance-based equity awards will be governed by the terms of those award agreements and will not be subject to this acceleration.

 

In the event the acquirer assumes or otherwise continues a participant’s time-based equity awards and the participant’s employment is terminated without Cause or the participant resigns for Good Reason during the Change in Control Period, each of the participant’s time-based equity awards shall be accelerated in full as of the date of the participant’s separation from service.

 

In the event that any payment or benefit received or to be received by a participant under the CiC Plan or otherwise would subject the participant to any excise tax pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code due to the characterization of such payments as an excess parachute payment under Section 280G of the Code, the amount of such payments shall be reduced to that the amount which produces the greatest after-tax benefit to the participant. The CiC Plan does not provide for payment of any applicable excise tax by us or other “gross-up” payments to offset the impact of any applicable excise tax.

 

The estimated potential amounts payable to our NEOs are described in “Estimated Payments Upon Termination Without Cause or Related to a Change in Control” below.

 

Executive Death and Disability Benefits

 

On February 10, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved a policy providing for a death and disability benefit for the Company’s executives, including our NEOs. The Compensation Committee subsequently determined to discontinue this benefit for executives hired after May 4, 2016. Other than Messrs. Davies and Arola, all NEOS who served during fiscal 2016 and all current executive officers of the Company, are entitled to this benefit; provided, however, that Mr. Meyercord’s death and disability benefit is as set forth in his offer letter described above. This policy provides that, in the event of an executive’s death or permanent disability (“Event”), the executive or his or her estate will receive (in addition to any other benefits to which they are entitled): (i) a cash severance payment of 12 months of base salary (6.5 months if the Event occurs after June 30,

 

60


Table of Contents

2016) or, should the Event occur during a Change in Control Period, 13 months of salary plus 100% of the executive’s target bonus; (ii) the acceleration of vesting of outstanding time-based unvested equity awards; and (iii) the acceleration of vesting of a certain number of MSU shares granted to the NEO prior to the Event. The number of MSU shares for which vesting shall be accelerated shall be calculated as if the executive’s employment was terminated in connection with a Change in Control of the Company, as described below. In fiscal 2016, only Messrs. Arola and Rice held MSUs. Mr. Arola forfeited his MSUs when he terminated employment on June 30, 2016. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, Mr. Rice holds 8,900 MSUs.

 

Executive Severance Policy

 

On February 11, 2014, the Compensation Committee adopted resolutions to provide the Company’s executives (except for Mr. Meyercord who has the severance benefits under his offer letter described above) with certain severance benefits upon a termination of their employment for convenience and other than in connection with a Change in Control of the Company, consisting of severance pay based upon base salary and continuation of certain benefits. On February 10, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved amendments to that severance policy and increased the cash severance payment to be made in the event of a termination for convenience to 12 months of base salary (from 6 months of base salary) through June 30, 2016. On May 4, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved further amendments to the executive severance policy and reduced the severance payment to 6.5 months base salary for employment terminations occurring after June 30, 2016. In addition to the severance payment, the Company currently provides: (i) provision of two months (or up to 6 months for Messrs. Gault and Rice and Ms. Motiey) of substantially similar health insurance benefits and at the same premium cost to the participant as in effect on the date of termination; and (ii) one month of outplacement services. All NEOs are entitled to this benefit as set forth in their offer letters. The Company conditions the receipt of the severance benefits described above on the executive’s execution and delivery of a general release of claims in the prescribed form.

 

Equity Awards

 

The terms of certain equity awards made to NEOs may include provisions regarding acceleration of vesting, exercisability and settlement in the event of a Change in Control. Currently, no PSUs are subject to any accelerated vesting and the time-based equity awards are subject to the acceleration as described under the various arrangements above. With respect to the MSUs, in accordance with their award agreement, in the event of a Change in Control (i) the performance achievement and the number of earned shares subject to the MSUs for each Performance Period that has ended on or before the day immediately preceding the Change in Control will be certified by the Compensation Committee and settled prior to the effective time, to the extent the Compensation Committee has not already certified performance and settlement and (ii) each Performance Period that has not ended prior to the day immediately preceding the Change in Control will be shortened to end on the day immediately preceding the Change in Control and the number of earned shares subject to the MSUs will be determined as follows:

 

   

The Compensation Committee will determine the number of earned shares subject to the MSUs for each shortened performance period after taking into account the following modification to the performance components: (1) the Company’s Performance goal shall be determined as provided by the award agreement, except that the Company’s average adjust closing price shall be replaced with the price per share of our common stock to be paid in accordance with the definitive agreement governing the transaction constituting the Change in Control (or, in the absence of such agreement, the closing price per share of our common stock on the last trading day of the shortened Performance Period) and (2) the Index Performance goal shall be determined as provided by the award agreement, except that the average closing index value shall be determined for the 60 market trading days ending on the last market trading day of the shortened Performance Period. All MSUs that are not earned shares will terminate and cease to be outstanding as of such Change in Control.

 

   

As of the last day of any shortened Performance Period (subject to the NEO’s continued service through such date), a portion of the earned shares as determined above will be accelerated, with such portion

 

61


Table of Contents
 

determined by multiplying the total number of earned shares by a fraction, the numerator of which equals the number of days contained in the shortened Performance Period and the denominator of which equals the number of days contained in the corresponding original Performance Period. The accelerated shares pursuant to this section will be settled immediately prior to the effective time of the Change in Control.

 

   

With respect to each shortened Performance Period, that portion of the earned shares determined that are not accelerated in accordance with the second bullet above will vest in equal monthly installments determined from the effective date of the Change in Control over the remainder of the corresponding original Performance Period determined, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.

 

In addition, if a NEO is terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason during a Change in Control Period (all terms as defined above), then the vesting of each earned share determined in accordance with the third bullet above shall be accelerated (provided that any MSUs that were not earned will not be accelerated pursuant to this sentence).

 

Indemnity Agreements

 

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our executive officers and directors. These indemnification agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by law.

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to stock and option awards and other plan-based awards, including non-equity incentive awards (cash bonuses), granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 2016. For a narrative description of the various plan-based awards set forth in the following table, see the discussion above under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

          Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
    Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards
  All
Other

Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
    Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(2)
 

Name

  Grant
Date
    Threshold
($)
    Target
($)
    Maximum
($)
    Threshold
(#)
    Target
(#)
   

Maximum

(#)

   

Edward B. Meyercord(4)

    —          375,000        720,000        1,080,000        —          —        —       —          —     

Kenneth Arola

    —          129,500        259,000        388,508        —          —        —       —          —     
    8/15/2015        —          —          —          —          —        —       60,000        178,800 (3) 
    8/15/2015        —          —          —          —          60,000      —       —          120,600 (4) 

Benjamin Drew Davies

    —          14,584        29,167        43,750        —          —        —       —          —     
    6/1/2016        —          —          —          —          —        —       100,000        376,000 (5) 
    6/1/2016        —          —          —          —          100,000      —       —          287,000 (6) 

Robert Gault

    —          172,500        345,000        517,500        —          —        —       —          —     
    8/15/2016        —          —          —          —          —        —       80,000        238,400 (3) 
    8/15/2016        —          —          —          —          80,000      —       —          160,800 (4) 

Norman Rice

    —          138,125        276,250        414,375        —          —        —       —          —     
    8/15/2016        —          —          —          —          —        —       60,000        178,800 (3) 
    8/15/2016        —          —          —          —          60,000      —       —          120,600 (4) 

Katayoun Motiey

    —          54,542        109,083        163,635        —          —        —       —          —     
    12/15/2015        —          —          —          —          —        —       280,000        1,122,800 (7) 

 

(1)

Our annual incentives usually are, and in fiscal 2016 were, based upon threshold, target and maximum payout amounts set by our Compensation Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year. Actual payout opportunities for each semi-annual bonus payment will range from a threshold of 50% of target to a

 

62


Table of Contents
  maximum of 150% of target. The threshold reflects the amount that would be payable under the FY16 Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan if the minimum performance level was achieved. If the minimum performance level for payment of the threshold amount was not achieved then no bonus would have been payable under the plan. The actual amount earned by each named executive officer for fiscal 2016 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”
(2) The grant date fair value is generally the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the award’s service period in accordance with ASC Topic 718, but does exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For information on the assumptions used to calculate the value of the awards, refer to Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
(3) These RSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on each of August 15, 2016. August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(4) These are PSUs, which were granted August 15, 2015 and commenced vesting on December 11, 2015 when the performance target (the Company’s stock price meeting or exceeding $3.95 for 30 consecutive trading days) was satisfied. 1/3 of the shares vested upon achieving the performance metric. The remaining shares will vest as to 1/3 of the shares on August 15, 2017 and 1/3 of the shares on August 15, 2018, subject to the applicable NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(5) These RSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on June 1, 2017 and as to 1/12 of the award each quarter thereafter, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(6) These are PSUs, which were granted on June 1, 2016, have a performance target of the Company’s stock price meet or exceed $5.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days. Once the performance target is met, these PSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on June 1, 2017 and 1/12 each quarter thereafter, subject to Mr. Davies’ continued service through such date.
(7) These RSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on each of December 15, 2016, December 15, 2017 and December 15, 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.

 

63


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding each unexercised option and all unvested stock awards held by each of our named executive officers as of June 30, 2016:

 

          Option Awards     Stock Awards        

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(#)
    Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(#)
    Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)
    Options
Exercise
Price
($)
    Options
Expiration
Date
    Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested

(#)
   

Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested

($)(13)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

($)

Edward B. Meyercord

    25,000        —          —          2.09        10/28/2016        —        —     —     —  
    15,000        —          —          2.82        12/23/2016        —        —     —     —  
    15,000        —          —          3.02        12/15/2017        —        —     —     —  
    15,000        —          —          3.87        4/26/2019        —        —     —     —  
    75,000        825,000 (1)      600,000 (1)      2.51        5/8/2022        —        —     —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          337,500 (4)    1,144,125   —     —  

Kenneth Arola(14)

    145,166        —          —          5.21        8/18/2021        —        —     —     —  

Benjamin Drew Davies

    —          —          —          —          —          —        —     —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          100,000 (5)    339,000   —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          —        —     100,000(6)   339,000

Robert Gault

    37,500        62,500 (3)      —          2.51        5/8/2022        —        —     —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          52,800 (7)    178,992   —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          80,000 (8)    271,200   —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          —        —     53,333(9)   180,799

Norman Rice

    58,333        41,667 (2)      —          5.67        2/7/2021        —        —     —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          16,500 (11)    55,935   —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          5,874 (7)    19,913   —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          60,000 (8)    203,400   —     —  
    —          —          —          —          —          —        135,600   8,900(10)   30,171
    —          —          —          —          —          —        —     40,000(9)   135,600

Katayoun Motiey

    —          —          —          —          —          280,000 (12)    949,200   —     —  

 

(1) This performance-based stock option is based on the Company’s attainment of specific stock prices, where one-third of the shares will be earned, if at all, once the Company’s common stock has traded publicly for at least 30 consecutive trading days at a target closing price per share of at least $3.50; an additional one-third of the shares will be earned, if at all, once the Company’s common stock has traded publicly for at least 30 consecutive trading days at a target closing price per share of at least $4.50; and all remaining shares will be earned, if at all, upon the Company’s common stock trading publicly for at least 30 consecutive trading days at a target closing price per share of at least $5.50. Once the applicable stock price is achieved, the option is earned and thereafter vests over 2 years at 1/24th each month following the date upon which date the performance shares were earned, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates. 300,000 option shares were earned in December 2015 and thereafter commenced vesting. The performance thresholds for 600,000 of the shares subject to the performance option have not been met.
(2) This stock option vests monthly and will be fully vested on February 7, 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(3) This stock option vested as to 25 percent of the option shares on December 15, 2015 and thereafter vests monthly for 36 months, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates. It will be fully vested on December 15, 2018.
(4) These RSUs vested as to 25% of the units on April 19, 2016 and the remainder vest as to 25% on each of April 19, 2017, April 19, 2018 and April 15, 2019, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(5) These RSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on June 1, 2017 and as to 1/12 of the award each quarter thereafter, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(6) Once the performance goal of the Company’s stock price meeting or exceeding $5.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading day has been achieved, these PSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on June 1, 2017 and as to 1/12 each quarter thereafter, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(7) These RSUs vested as to 1/3 of the units on December 15, 2015 and the remainder vest as to 1/3 on each of December 15, 2016, and December 15, 2017, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(8) These RSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on each of August 15, 2016. August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(9) These PSUs commenced vesting in December 2015 when the performance target (the Company’s stock price meeting or exceeding $3.95 for 30 consecutive trading days) was satisfied and 1/3 of the PSUs vested. 1/3 of the PSUs will vest on August 15, 2017 and 1/3 of the PSUs will vest on August 15, 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.

 

64


Table of Contents
(10) These MSUs are earned and vest based upon the Company’s share performance as compared to the NASDAQ Composite Index during the applicable performance period. There are three performance periods under this MSU, and the first performance period concluded on December 31, 2015. These shares represent the shares available under the remaining two tranches at 100% of target ending on December 31, 2016 and 2017, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(11) These RSUs vested as to 1/3 of the units on January 2, 2015 and 1/3 on January 2, 2016 and the remainder vest as to 1/3 on January 2, 2017, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates
(12) These RSUs vest as to 1/3 of the units on each of December 15, 2016, December 15, 2017 and December 15, 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued service through such dates.
(13) The market value of the share awards is based on the closing price of our common stock as of June 30, 2016, which was $3.39. Market values shown assume all performance criteria are met at the maximum payout level.
(14) Mr. Arola’s employment with the Company ended on June 30, 2016, and he forfeited all of his unvested stock options, RSUs, PSUs and MSUs after such date.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Last Fiscal Year

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning vesting of common stock awards (either RSUs, PSUs or MSUs) held by our NEOs during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. No options were exercised by our NEOs during fiscal 2016.

 

     Stock Awards  

Name

   Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting

(#)
     Value
Realized
on
Vesting(1)

($)
 

Edward B. Meyercord

     144,500         481,280   

Kenneth Arola

     99,251         367,453   

Robert Gault

     91,012         342,102   

Norman Rice

     44,002         166,839   

Katayoun Motiey

     —           —     

Benjamin Drew Davies

     —           —     

 

(1) Represents the amount realized based on the market price of our common stock on the vesting date.

 

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

 

We do not have any plans with any of our named executive officers that provide for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement. We also do not have any defined contribution or other plan with any of our named executive officers that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.

 

Estimated Payments Upon Termination Without Cause or Upon Change in Control

 

We have entered into agreements and maintain certain plans and policies that entitle our NEOs to certain benefits in the event of (i) a