|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
First Potomac Realty Trust 10-Q 2011 Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011.
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-31824
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
7600 Wisconsin Avenue, 11th Floor, Bethesda, MD 20814
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (301) 986-9200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filter, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES o NO þ
As of
November 4, 2011, there were 50,291,606 common shares, par value $0.001 per share,
outstanding.
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
Table of Contents
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Continued (unaudited) Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the nine months ended September 30 are
as follows (amounts in thousands):
Cash paid for interest on indebtedness is net of capitalized interest of $1.3 million and $0.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, 1,300 Operating Partnership units were
redeemed for an equivalent number of the Companys common shares. No Operating Partnership units
were redeemed for an equivalent number of the Companys common shares during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the Company acquired six consolidated
properties at an aggregate purchase price of $251.5 million, including the assumption of mortgage
debt with an aggregate fair value of $139.4 million. During the nine months ended September 30,
2011, the Company issued 1,963,388 Operating Partnership units valued at $28.8 million in
connection with the acquisition of 840 First Street, NE, which was acquired for an aggregate
purchase price of $90.0 million, with up to $10.0 million of additional consideration payable upon
the terms of a lease renewal by the buildings sole tenant or the re-tenanting of the property. As
a result, the Company recorded a contingent consideration obligation of $9.4 million at
acquisition. In July 2011, the buildings sole tenant renewed its lease through August 2023 on the
entire building with the exception of two floors. As a result, the Company issued 544,673 Operating
Partnership units to satisfy a portion of its contingent consideration obligation. The Company
recognized a $1.5 million gain associated with the issuance of the additional units, which
represented the difference between the contractual value of the units and the fair value of the
units at the date of issuance. At September 30, 2011, the remaining contingent consideration
obligation was $0.7 million, which may result in the issuance of additional units dependent upon
the leasing of any of the vacant space.
6
Table of Contents
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Description of Business
First Potomac Realty Trust (the Company) is a leader in the ownership, management,
development and redevelopment of office and industrial properties in the greater Washington, D.C.
region. The Company separates its properties into four distinct segments, which it refers to as the
Maryland, Washington, D.C., Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia reporting segments. The Company
strategically focuses on acquiring and redeveloping properties that it believes can benefit from
its intensive property management and seeks to reposition these properties to increase their
profitability and value. The Companys portfolio contains a mix of single-tenant and multi-tenant
office and industrial properties as well as business parks. Office properties are single-story and
multi-story buildings that are used primarily for office use; business parks contain buildings with
office features combined with some industrial property space; and industrial properties generally
are used as warehouse, distribution or manufacturing facilities.
References in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements to we, our or
First Potomac, refer to the Company and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
The Company conducts its business through First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership,
the Companys operating partnership (the Operating Partnership). The Company is the sole general
partner of, and, as of September 30, 2011, owned a 94.5% interest in, the Operating Partnership.
The remaining interests in the Operating Partnership, which are presented as noncontrolling
interests in the Operating Partnership in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements, are limited partnership interests, some of which are owned by several of the
Companys executive officers and trustees who contributed properties and other assets to the
Company upon its formation, and other unrelated parties.
At September 30, 2011, the Company wholly-owned or had a controlling interest in properties
totaling 13.9 million square feet and had a noncontrolling ownership interest in properties
totaling an additional 0.5 million square feet through four unconsolidated joint ventures. The
Company also owned land that can accommodate approximately 2.4 million square feet of additional
development. The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from leases of space within its
properties. As of September 30, 2011, the Companys largest tenant was the U.S. Government, which
along with government contractors, accounted for over 20% of the Companys total annualized rental
revenue. The U.S Government also accounted for approximately 30% of the Companys outstanding
accounts receivables at September 30, 2011. The Company operates so as to qualify as a real estate
investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts
of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership in which
it has a controlling interest and First Potomac Management LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary that
manages the majority of the Companys properties. All intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company has condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The
Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to prevent the information presented from being
misleading. However, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the Companys
current report on Form 8-K dated September 29, 2011 and as
updated from time to time in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the Companys opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals
necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position as of September 30, 2011, the results
of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and its cash
flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Interim results are not necessarily
indicative of full-year performance due, in part, to the timing of transactions and the impact of
acquisitions and dispositions throughout the year.
7
Table of Contents
(b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the period. Estimates include the amount of accounts receivable that may be
uncollectible; recoverability of notes receivable, future cash flows, discount and capitalization
rate assumptions used to fair value acquired properties and to test impairment of certain
long-lived assets and goodwill; derivative valuations; market lease rates, lease-up periods,
leasing and tenant improvement costs used to fair value intangible assets acquired and probability
weighted cash flow analysis used to fair value contingent liabilities. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
(c) Rental Property
Rental property is carried at initial cost less accumulated depreciation and, when
appropriate, impairment losses. Improvements and replacements are capitalized at cost when they
extend the useful life, increase capacity or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and
maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of
the Companys assets, by class, are as follows:
The Company regularly reviews market conditions for possible impairment of a propertys
carrying value. When circumstances such as adverse market conditions, changes in managements
intended holding period or potential sale to a third party indicate a possible impairment of the
fair value of a property, an impairment analysis is performed. The Company assesses potential
impairments based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges)
expected to result from the propertys use and eventual disposition. This estimate is based on
projections of future revenues, expenses, capital improvement costs, expected holding periods and
capitalization rates. These cash flows consider factors such as expected market trends and leasing
prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment
exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment based on
forecasted undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying
value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. The Company is required to make estimates
as to whether there are impairments in the carrying values of its investments in real estate.
Further, the Company will record an impairment loss if it expects to dispose of a property, in the
near term, at a price below carrying value. In such an event, the Company will record an impairment
loss based on the difference between a propertys carrying value and its projected sales price less
any estimated costs to sell.
The Company will classify a building as held-for-sale in the period in which it has made the
decision to dispose of the building, the Companys Board of Trustees or a designated delegate has
approved the sale, a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed under which the
buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash and no significant financing
contingencies exist that could cause the transaction not to be completed in a timely manner. The
Company will classify any impairment loss, together with the buildings operating results, as
discontinued operations in its consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented and
classify the assets and related liabilities as held-for-sale in its consolidated balance sheets in
the period the sale criteria are met. Interest expense is reclassified to discontinued operations
only to the extent the held-for-sale property is secured by specific mortgage debt and the mortgage
debt will not be assigned to another property owned by the Company after the disposition.
The Company recognizes the fair value, if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate
the fair value, of any liability for conditional asset retirement obligations when incurred, which
is generally upon acquisition, construction, development or redevelopment and/or through the normal
operation of the asset.
8
Table of Contents
The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred on qualifying expenditures for real estate
assets under development or redevelopment while being readied for their intended use in accordance
with accounting requirements regarding capitalization of interest. The Company will capitalize
interest when qualifying expenditures for the asset have been made, activities
necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use are in progress and interest costs are
being incurred. Capitalized interest also includes interest associated with expenditures incurred
to acquire developable land while development activities are in progress and the direct
compensation costs of the Companys construction personnel who manage the development and
redevelopment projects, but only to the extent the employees time can be allocated to a project.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, capitalized compensation costs
were immaterial. Capitalization of interest will end when the asset is substantially complete and
ready for its intended use, but no later than one year from completion of major construction
activity, if the property is not occupied. Capitalized interest is depreciated over the useful life
of the underlying assets, commencing when those assets are placed into service.
(d) Notes Receivable
The Company lends money to the owners of real estate properties, which are collateralized by a
direct or indirect interest in the real estate property. The Company records these investments as
Notes receivable, net in its consolidated balance sheets. The investments are recorded net of any
discount or issuance costs, which are amortized over the life of the respective note receivable
using the effective interest method. The Company records interest earned from notes receivable and
amortization of any discount or issuance costs within Interest and other income in its
consolidated statements of operations.
The Company will establish a provision for anticipated credit losses associated with its notes
receivables and debt investments when it anticipates that it may be unable to collect any
contractually due amounts. This determination is based on upon such factors as delinquencies, loss
experience, collateral quality and current economic or borrower conditions. Estimated losses are
recorded as a charge to earnings to establish an allowance for credit losses that the Company
estimates to be adequate based on these factors. The Company has not recorded any losses associated
with its notes receivable during 2011 and 2010.
(e) Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
(f) Application of New Accounting Standards
New guidance was issued that allows only two options for presenting the components of net
income and other comprehensive income: (1) in a single continuous financial statement, statement of
comprehensive income or (2) in two separate but consecutive financial statements, consisting of an
income statement followed by a separate statement of other comprehensive income. Also, items that
are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income must be presented on the face of the
consolidated financial statements. The guidance requires retrospective application, and it is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early
adoption permitted. The Company believes the adoption of this update will change the order in which
certain consolidated financial statements are presented and provide additional detail on those consolidated financial
statements when applicable, but will not have any other impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the testing of potential
goodwill impairment, which permits a company to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more
likely than not that a reporting units fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying
the two-step goodwill impairment test. If a company can support the conclusion that it is not more
likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it would
not need to perform the two-step impairment test for that reporting unit. Goodwill must be tested
for impairment at least annually, and prior to the new guidance, a two-step test was required to
assess goodwill for impairment. The required disclosure is effective for annual and interim
goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early
adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the implementation of this standard will have
a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
(3) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings or loss per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income or loss
attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS is computed after adjusting the basic EPS computation for the effect of
dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, which include stock options,
non-vested shares, preferred shares and Exchangeable Senior Notes. The Company applies the
two-class method for determining EPS as its outstanding unvested shares with non-forfeitable
dividend rights are considered participating securities. The Companys excess of distributions over
earnings related to participating securities are shown as a reduction in total earnings
attributable to common shareholders in the Companys computation of EPS.
9
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the computation of the Companys basic and diluted earnings per
share (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
In accordance with accounting requirements regarding earnings per share, the Company did
not include the following potential common shares in its calculation of diluted earnings per share
as they are anti-dilutive (amounts in thousands):
10
Table of Contents
(4) Rental Property
Rental property represents property, net of accumulated depreciation, and developable land
that are wholly owned or owned by an entity in which the Company has a controlling interest. All of
the Companys rental properties are located within the greater Washington, D.C. region. Rental
property consists of the following (amounts in thousands):
(a) Development and Redevelopment Activity
The Company constructs office buildings, business parks and/or industrial buildings on a
build-to-suit basis or with the intent to lease upon completion of construction. Also, the Company
owns developable land that can accommodate 2.4 million square feet of additional building space.
Below is a summary of the approximate building square footage that can be developed on the
Companys developable land and the Companys current development and redevelopment activity
(amounts in thousands):
The Company anticipates the majority of the development and redevelopment efforts on
these projects will continue throughout the remainder of 2011 and into 2012.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had completed development and redevelopment activities that
have yet to be placed in service on 243 thousand square feet, at a cost of $16.1 million, in its
Northern Virginia reporting segment and 39 thousand square feet, at a cost of $1.2 million, in its
Southern Virginia reporting segment. The majority of the costs on the construction projects to be
placed in service relate to redevelopment activities at Three Flint Hill in the Companys Northern
Virginia reporting segment, which were completed in the third quarter of 2011 at a cost of $11.0
million. The Company will place completed construction activities in service upon the shorter of a
tenant taking occupancy or twelve months from substantial completion.
11
Table of Contents
(b) Acquisitions
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company acquired the following properties, which are
included in its condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition (dollars
in thousands):
On August 4, 2011, the Company formed a joint venture with an affiliate of Perseus
Realty, LLC to acquire 1005 First Street, NE in Washington, D.C. for $46.8 million, of which, $38.4
million was paid at closing and the remaining $8.4 million will be paid in August 2013. The Company
recorded the $8.4 million deferred purchase price obligation at its fair value at the time of
acquisition within Accounts payable and other liabilities in its consolidated balance sheets. The
Company determined the fair value of the deferred purchase price by calculating the present value
of the obligation that is due in 2013 using a discount rate for comparable transactions. The site
is currently occupied by the Greyhound Lines, Inc., Greyhound, which leased back the site under a
ten-year lease agreement with a termination option, at no penalty, after the second year.
Greyhound has announced that it intends to relocate its operations to nearby Union Station, at
which point the joint venture anticipates developing the 1.6 acre site, which can accommodate
development of up to approximately 712,000 square feet of office space. The development of the site will be managed by an affiliate of Perseus Realty, LLC. The property is located in
a former industrial area of Washington, D.C. where contaminated soil and/or groundwater are
commonly encountered due to past usage. The Company solicited a third party to quantify the
remediation needed at the property to remove any contaminates. The third party determined the
approximate cost of the site remediation to be $2.4 million, which the Company recorded as an
addition to Accounts payable and other liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets. The
Company anticipates owning 97% of the joint venture when the joint venture is fully capitalized. At acquisition, the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in the Greyhound property was approximately $1.2 million,
which equates to the Companys joint venture partners proportionate share of the purchase price.
The fair values for the assets and liabilities acquired in 2011 are preliminary as the Company
continues to finalize their acquisition date fair value determination.
12
Table of Contents
At September 30, 2011, the weighted average amortization period of the Companys consolidated
intangible assets acquired in the third quarter of 2011 was 3.3 years. At September 30, 2011, the
intangible assets acquired during the third quarter are comprised of the following categories with
their respective weighted average amortization periods: acquired tenant
improvements 3.6 years; in-place leases 3.1 years; acquired leasing commissions 3.6 years;
marketing and legal expenses 3.4 years; above market leases 3.4 years; and below-market leases 4.4
years.
In March 2011, the Company acquired 840 First Street, NE, and, upon completion of the final
tax return by the prior ownership entity during the third quarter, the Company recognized a
deferred tax liability associated with the carryover basis of the property. As a result, the
Company recognized goodwill of approximately $4.8 million on its consolidated balance sheet
representing the residual difference between the consideration transferred and the acquisition date
fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including deferred taxes
representing the difference between the fair value at acquisition and the carryover basis used for
income tax purposes.
(5) Notes Receivable
Below is a summary of the Companys notes receivable as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in
thousands):
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded interest
income of $1.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively, related to its notes receivable.
(6) Investment in Affiliates
The Company owns an interest in several properties for which it does not control the
activities that are most significant to the operations of the properties. As a result, the assets,
liabilities and operating results of these noncontrolled properties are not consolidated within the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements. The Companys investment in these properties
is recorded as Investment in affiliates in its consolidated balance sheets.
Since January 1, 2010, the Company has had a 25% noncontrolling interest in the two separate
unconsolidated joint ventures that own RiversPark I and II. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the
Company entered into two separate joint ventures, in which it had a 50% noncontrolling interest, to
own 1750 H Street, NW and Aviation Business Park.
The net assets of the Companys unconsolidated joint ventures consisted of the following
(amounts in thousands):
13
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the results of operations of the Companys unconsolidated
joint ventures. The Companys share of earnings or losses related to its unconsolidated joint
ventures is recorded in its consolidated statements of operations as Equity in losses of
affiliates (amounts in thousands):
(7) Discontinued Operations
The following table is a summary of property dispositions whose operating results are
reflected as discontinued operations in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of
operations:
The Company has had, and will have, no continuing involvement with any of its disposed
properties subsequent to their disposal. The operations of the disposed properties were not subject
to any income taxes. The Company did not dispose of or enter into any binding agreements to sell
any other properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
The following table summarizes the components of net loss from discontinued operations
(amounts in thousands):
14
Table of Contents
(8) Debt
The Companys borrowings consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
(a) Mortgage Loans
The following table provides a summary of the Companys mortgage debt at September 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
15
Table of Contents
(b) Unsecured Term Loan
On July 18, 2011, the Company entered into a three-tranche $175.0 million unsecured term loan.
The unsecured term loans three tranches have maturity dates staggered in one-year intervals.
Tranche A has an outstanding balance of $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 215 basis
points and matures on July 18, 2016. Tranche B has an outstanding balance of $60.0 million at an
interest rate of LIBOR plus 225 basis points and matures on July 18, 2017. Tranche C has an
outstanding balance of $55.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 230 basis points and matures
on July 18, 2018. The term loan agreement contains various restrictive covenants substantially
similar to those contained in the Companys revolving credit facility, including with respect to
liens, indebtedness, investments, distributions, mergers and asset sales. In addition, the
agreement requires that the Company satisfy certain financial covenants that are also substantially
similar to those contained in the Companys revolving credit facility. The agreement also includes
customary events of default, the occurrence of which, following any applicable cure period, would
permit the lenders to, among other things, declare the principal, accrued interest and other
obligations of the Company under the agreement to be immediately due and payable. The Company used
the funds to pay down $117.0 million of the outstanding balance on its unsecured revolving credit
facility, to repay its $50.0 million senior secured term loan and for other general corporate
purposes.
(c) Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company repaid $117.0 million of the outstanding balance
of its unsecured revolving credit facility with proceeds from the issuance of a $175.0 million
unsecured term loan. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company borrowed $95.0 million on its
unsecured revolving credit facility to fund the acquisition of 1005 First Street, NE, to repay the
outstanding balance on two mortgage loans, to repay its $20.0 million secured term loan and for
general corporate purposes. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Companys
weighted average borrowings outstanding on its unsecured revolving credit facility were $133.9
million and $133.3 million, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.7% and 3.0%,
respectively, compared with weighted average borrowings of $125.7 million and $120.5 million with a
weighted average interest rate of 3.3% and 3.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively. At September 30, 2011, outstanding borrowings under the unsecured revolving
credit facility were $142.0 million. The Company is required to pay an annual commitment fee of
0.25% based on the amount of unused capacity under the unsecured revolving credit facility, which
was $113.0 million at September 30, 2011.
(d) Interest Rate Swap Agreements
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into five interest rate swap agreements
that fixed LIBOR on $150.0 million of its variable rate debt. As of September 30, 2011, the Company
has hedged $200.0 million of its variable rate debt through six interest rate swap agreements. See
footnote 9, Derivative Instruments and Comprehensive Loss for more information about the Companys
interest rate swap agreements.
16
Table of Contents
(e) Debt Covenants
Certain of the Companys subsidiaries are borrowers on mortgage loans, the terms of which
prohibit certain direct or indirect transfers of ownership interests in the borrower subsidiary (a
Prohibited Transfer). Under the terms of the mortgage loan documents, a lender could assert that
a Prohibited Transfer includes the trading of the Companys common shares on the NYSE, the issuance
of common shares by the Company, or the issuance of units of limited partnership interest in the
Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2011, the Company believes that there were six mortgage
loans with such Prohibited Transfer provisions, representing an aggregate principal amount
outstanding of approximately $57.2 million, of which two mortgages totaling $38.9 million are
scheduled to mature in 2012. Two of these mortgage loans were entered into prior to the Companys
initial public offering (IPO) in 2003 and four were assumed subsequent to its IPO. In each
instance, the Company received the consent of the mortgage lender to consummate its IPO (for the
two pre-IPO loans) or to acquire the property or the ownership interests of the borrower (for the
post-IPO loans), including the assumption by its subsidiary of the mortgage loan. Generally, the
underlying mortgage documents, previously applicable to a privately held owner, were not changed at
the time of the IPO or the later loan assumptions, although the Company believes that each of the
lenders or servicers was aware that the borrowers ultimate parent was or would become a publicly
traded company. Subsequent to the IPO and the assumption of these additional mortgage loans, the
Company has issued new common shares and shares of the Company have been transferred on the New
York Stock Exchange. Similarly, the Operating Partnership has issued units of limited partnership
interest. To date, no lender or servicer has asserted that a Prohibited Transfer has occurred as a
result of any such transfer of shares or units of limited partnership interest. If a lender were to
be successful in any such action, the Company could be required to immediately repay or refinance
the amounts outstanding, or the lender may be able to foreclose on the property securing the loan
or take other adverse actions. In addition, in certain cases a Prohibited Transfer could result in
the loan becoming fully recourse to the Company or its Operating Partnership. In addition, if a
violation of a Prohibited Transfer provision were to occur that would permit the Companys mortgage
lenders to accelerate the indebtedness owed to them, it could result in an event of default under
the Companys Series A and Series B Senior Notes, its unsecured revolving credit facility, its
unsecured term loan, its secured term loan and its Exchangeable Senior Notes.
At September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants
associated with its debt instruments.
(9) Income Taxes
The Company owns properties located in Washington, D.C. that are subject to local income based
franchise taxes. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized
a benefit for income taxes of $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively, related to franchise
taxes levied by the city of Washington, D.C. at an effective rate of 9.975%. The Company acquired
its first property in Washington, D.C. that was subject to local franchise taxes in the fourth
quarter of 2010 and was not subject to any franchise taxes during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets only to the extent that it is more likely than not
that deferred tax assets will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax
planning strategies. The Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are primarily associated
with differences in the GAAP and tax basis of its real estate assets arising from acquisition
costs, intangible assets and deferred market rent assets and liabilities that are associated with
properties located in Washington, D.C. and recorded in its consolidated balance sheets. As of
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company recorded its deferred tax assets within
Prepaid expenses and other assets and recorded its deferred tax liabilities within Accounts
payable and other liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
The Company has not recorded a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as it
determined that is more likely than not that future operations will generate sufficient taxable
income to realize the deferred tax assets. The Company has not recognized any deferred tax assets
or liabilities as a result of uncertain tax positions and has no material net operating loss,
capital loss or alternative minimum tax carryovers. There was no (benefit) provision for income
taxes associated with the Companys discontinued operations for any period presented. At September 30, 2011, the Company had deferred tax assets totaling $1.3 million and deferred tax liabilities totaling $5.0 million.
17
Table of Contents
(10) Derivative Instruments and Comprehensive Loss
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from business operations and economic factors.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business
activities in which its future exposure to interest rate fluctuations is unknown. The objective in
the use of an interest rate derivative is to add stability to interest expenses and manage exposure
to interest rate changes. No hedging activity can completely insulate the Company from the risks
associated
with changes in interest rates. Moreover, interest rate hedging could fail to protect the
Company or adversely affect it because, among other things:
The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to hedge its exposure on its variable
rate debt against fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. The interest rate swap agreements fix
LIBOR to a specified interest rate; however, the swap agreements do not affect the contractual
spreads associated with each variable debt instruments applicable interest rate. During the third
quarter of 2011, the Company entered into five interest rate swap agreements that fixed LIBOR on
$150.0 million of its variable rate debt. At September 30, 2011, the Company has hedged $200.0
million of its variable rate debt through six interest rate swap agreements.
The table below summarizes the Companys interest rate swap agreements as of September 30,
2011 (dollars in thousands):
The Companys interest rate swap agreements are designated as effective cash flow hedges
and the Company records any unrealized gains associated with the change in fair value of the swap
agreements within equity and Prepaid expenses and other assets and any unrealized losses within
equity and Accounts payable and other liabilities. The Company records its proportionate share of
unrealized gains or losses on its cash flow hedges associated with its unconsolidated joint
ventures within equity and Investment in affiliates.
In September 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that fixed the
$28.0 million variable rate mortgage encumbering RiversPark I and II at 5.97%. The mortgage has a
contractual interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%. On March 17, 2009 and January 1, 2010, the Company
deconsolidated the joint ventures that own RiversPark II and RiversPark I, respectively. As a
result, the $28.0 million mortgage loan and related interest rate swap for RiversPark I and II are
not consolidated in the Companys consolidated financial statements. The interest rate swap
agreement matured in September 2011.
Total comprehensive loss is summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):
18
Table of Contents
(11) Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted accounting provisions that outline a valuation framework and create a fair
value hierarchy, which distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs)
and a reporting entitys own assumptions about market data (unobservable inputs). The new
disclosures increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related
disclosures. Fair value is identified, under the standard, as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between willing third parties at the measurement date
(an exit price). In accordance with GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair
value, and the Company provides the necessary disclosures that are required for items measured at
fair value as outlined in the accounting requirements regarding fair value.
Financial assets and liabilities, as well as those non-financial assets and liabilities
requiring fair value measurement, are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value
hierarchy.
The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is
defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient
frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active
(markets with few transactions), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset
or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 Unobservable inputs, only used to the extent that observable inputs are not
available, reflect the Companys assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.
In accordance with accounting provisions and the fair value hierarchy described above, the
following table shows the fair value of the Companys consolidated assets and liabilities that are
measured on a non-recurring and recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(amounts in thousands):
19
Table of Contents
Impairment of Real Estate Assets
The Company regularly reviews market conditions for possible impairment of a propertys
carrying value. When circumstances such as adverse market conditions, changes in managements
intended holding period or potential sale to a third party indicate a possible impairment of a
property, an impairment analysis is performed.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company incurred a $3.1 million impairment charge on its
Airpark Place property located in its Maryland reporting segment. Due to the shortening of the
anticipated holding period for this property, management has identified a triggering event for the
evaluation of a possible impairment. The Company determined the fair value of the property through
an assessment of market data and through an income approach based on discounted cash flows
anticipated over a reduced holding period.
On December 29, 2010, the Company acquired 7458 Candlewood Road, which is located in the
Companys Maryland reporting segment. Due to the bankruptcy of an acquired tenant, the Company
realized an impairment charge of $2.4 million to reflect the fair value of the intangible asset
associated with the tenants lease, which was determined to have no value. The non-recoverable
value of the intangible assets was based on, among other items, an analysis of current market
rates, the present value of future cash flows that were discounted using capitalization rates,
lease renewal probabilities, hypothetical leasing timeframes, historical leasing commissions,
expected value of tenant improvements and recently executed leases.
In September 2010, the Company adjusted its anticipated holding period for its Old Courthouse
Square property, which is located in the Companys Maryland reporting segment. The Company entered
into a non-binding contract to sell the asset in October 2010. As a result, the Company realized a
$3.4 million impairment charge to reduce the propertys carrying value to reflect its fair value,
less any potential selling costs. The property was sold on February 18, 2011 for net proceeds of
$10.8 million. The Company determined the fair value of the property through an assessment of
market data in working with a real estate broker on the transaction and based on the execution of a
non-binding letter of intent. The fair value was further validated through an income approach based
on discounted cash flows that reflected a reduced holding period.
The Company incurred impairment charges of $3.1 million and $5.8 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with $3.4 million and $4.0 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The Company recorded the $3.1
million Airpark Place impairment charge described above within continuing operations on its
consolidated statements of operations, the remaining impairment charges incurred during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 relate to properties that were subsequently
disposed of and are recorded within discontinued operations on the Companys consolidated
statements of operations.
Interest Rate Derivatives
On January 18, 2011, the Company fixed LIBOR at 1.474% on $50.0 million of its variable rate
debt through an interest rate swap agreement that matures on January 15, 2014. During the third
quarter of 2011, the Company entered into five interest rate swap agreements that fixed LIBOR on
$150.0 million of its variable rate debt with staggered maturities between July 2016 and 2018. The
derivatives are fair valued based on prevailing market yield curves on the measurement date. Also,
the Company evaluates counter-party risk in calculating the fair value of the interest rate swap
derivative instruments. The Companys interest rate swap derivatives are an effective cash flow
hedge and any change in fair value is recorded in the Companys equity section as Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss.
The Company uses a third party to assist with the valuation of its interest rate swap
agreements. The third party takes a daily snapshot of the market to obtain close of business
rates. The snapshot includes over 7,500 rates including LIBOR fixings, Eurodollar futures, swap
rates, exchange rates, treasuries, etc. This market data is obtained via direct feeds from
Bloomberg and Reuters and from Inter-Dealer Brokers. The selected rates are compared to their
historical values. Any rate that has changed by more than normal mean and related standard
deviation would be considered an outlier and flagged for further investigation. The rates are then
compiled through a valuation process that generates daily valuations, which are used to value the
Companys interest rate swap agreements.
20
Table of Contents
A summary of the Companys interest rate derivative liabilities which are included in
Accounts payable and other liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheets, is as
follows (amounts in thousands):
Contingent Consideration
On March 25, 2011, the Company acquired 840 First Street, NE, in Washington, D.C. for an
aggregate purchase price of $90.0 million, with up to $10.0 million of additional consideration
payable in Operating Partnership units upon the terms of a lease renewal by the buildings sole
tenant or the re-tenanting of the property through November 2013. Based on assessment of the
probability of renewal and anticipated lease rates, the Company recorded a contingent consideration
obligation of $9.4 million at acquisition. In July 2011, the buildings sole tenant renewed its
lease through August 2023 on the entire building with the exception of two floors. As a result, the
Company issued 544,673 Operating Partnership units to satisfy $7.1 million of its contingent
consideration obligation. The Company recognized a $1.5 million gain associated with the issuance
of the additional units, which represented the difference between the contractual value of the
units and the fair value of the units at the date of issuance. At September 30, 2011, the remaining
contingent consideration obligation was $0.7 million, which may result in the issuance of
additional units dependent upon the leasing of any of the vacant space. The fair value of the
contingent consideration obligation was determined based on several probability weighted discounted
cash flow scenarios that projected stabilization being achieved at certain timeframes. The fair
value was based, in part, on significant inputs, which are not observable in the market, thus
representing a Level 3 measurement in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
The Company has a contingent consideration obligation associated with the 2009 acquisition of
Ashburn Center. As part of the acquisition price of Ashburn Center, the Company entered into a fee
agreement with the seller under which the Company will be obligated to pay additional consideration
upon the property achieving stabilization per specified terms of the agreement. The Company
determines the fair value of the obligation through an income approach based on discounted cash
flows that project stabilization being achieved within a certain timeframe. The more significant
inputs associated with the fair value determination of the contingent consideration include
estimates of capitalization rates, discount rates and various assumptions regarding the propertys
operating performance and profitability.
The Company did not recognize any additional gains or losses associated with its contingent
consideration for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 or the three months ended
September 30, 2010. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company fully leased the Ashburn Center,
which resulted in an increase in its potential obligation, and recorded a $0.7 million increase in
its contingent consideration to reflect the increase in the Companys potential obligation with a
corresponding entry to Contingent Consideration Related to Acquisition of Property in its
consolidated statements of operations. The Company has classified its contingent consideration
liabilities within Accounts payable and other liabilities and any changes in its fair value
subsequent to their acquisition date valuation are charged to earnings. There was no significant
change in the fair value of the contingent consideration during the quarter ended September 30,
2010.
A summary of the Companys consolidated contingent consideration obligations is as follows
(amounts in thousands):
21
Table of Contents
With the exception of its contingent consideration obligation, the Company did not re-measure
or complete any transactions involving non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that are
measured on a recurring basis during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010. Also, no transfers
into and out of fair value measurements levels occurred during the nine months ended September 30,
2011 or 2010.
Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, accounts
payable and other liabilities, with the exception of any items listed above, approximate their fair
values due to their short-term maturities. The Company uses third parties with mezzanine lending
expertise to value its notes receivable based on comparable deals, market analysis and underlying
asset operating results. The Company calculates the fair value of its debt instruments by
discounting future contractual principal and interest payments using prevailing market rates for
securities with similar terms and characteristics at the balance sheet date. The carrying amount
and estimated fair value of the Companys note receivables and debt instruments at September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
(12) Equity
On August 12, 2011, the Company paid a dividend of $0.20 per share to common shareholders of
record as of August 5, 2011 and paid a dividend of $0.484375 per share to preferred shareholders of
record as of August 5, 2011. On October 25, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.20 per
common share, which is payable on November 11, 2011 to common shareholders of record as of November
4, 2011 and a dividend of $0.484375 per share on its Series A Preferred Shares, which is payable on
November 15, 2011 to preferred shareholders of record as of November 4, 2011. Dividends on all
non-vested share awards are recorded as a reduction of shareholders equity. For each dividend
paid by the Company on its common stock, the Operating Partnership distributes an equivalent
distribution on its Operating Partnership units.
On November 1, 2011, the Company began issuing shares of its common
stock under its control equity offering program. During 2010, the
Company issued 0.5 million common shares through its controlled
equity program, which generated net proceeds of approximately
$7.3 million.
22
Table of Contents
As a result of the redemption feature of the Operating Partnership units requiring delivery of
registered shares of the Company, the noncontrolling interests associated with the Operating
Partnerhsip are recorded outside of permanent equity. The Companys equity and redeemable
noncontrolling interests are as follows (amounts in thousands):
(13) Noncontrolling Interests in Partnerships
(a) Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
Noncontrolling interests relate to the interests in the Operating Partnership not owned by the
Company. Interests in the Operating Partnership are owned by limited partners who contributed
buildings and other assets to the Operating Partnership in exchange for Operating Partnership
units. Limited partners have the right to tender their units for redemption in exchange for, at the
Companys option, common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis or cash based on the fair
value of the Companys common shares at the date of redemption. Unitholders receive a distribution
per unit equivalent to the dividend per common share.
Differences between amounts paid to redeem noncontrolling interests and their carrying values
are charged or credited to equity. As a result of the redemption feature of the Operating
Partnership units, the noncontrolling interests are recorded outside of permanent equity.
Noncontrolling interests are presented at the greater of their fair value or their cost basis,
which is comprised of their fair value at issuance, subsequently adjusted for the noncontrolling
interests share of net income, losses, distributions received, preferred dividends paid or
additional contributions. Based on the closing share price of the Companys common stock at
September 30, 2011, the cost to acquire, through cash purchase or issuance of the Companys common
shares, all of the outstanding Operating Partnership units not owned by the Company would be
approximately $36.4 million.
At December 31, 2010, 958,473 Operating Partnership units, or 1.9%, were not owned by the
Company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 1,963,388 Operating
Partnership units valued at $28.8 million to partially fund the acquisition of 840 First Street,
NE, which included the partial retirement of a contingent consideration obligation entered into
with the seller at acquisition. Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, 1,300
Operating Partnership units were redeemed for 1,300 common shares fair valued at $19 thousand. As a
result, 2,920,561 of the total outstanding Operating Partnership units, or 5.5%, were not owned by
the Company at September 30, 2011. There were no Operating Partnership units redeemed with
available cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
23
Table of Contents
(b) Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Partnerships
When the Company is deemed to have a controlling interest in a partially-owned entity, it will
consolidate all of the entitys assets, liabilities and operating results within its condensed
consolidated financial statements. The cash contributed to the consolidated entity by the third
party, if any, will be reflected in the permanent equity section of the Companys consolidated
balance sheets to the extent they are not mandatorily redeemable. The amount will be recorded based
on the third partys initial investment in the consolidated entity and will be adjusted to reflect
the third partys share of earnings or losses in the consolidated entity and any distributions
received or additional contributions made by the third party. The earnings or losses from the
entity attributable to the third party are recorded as a component of net loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests.
At September 30, 2011, the Companys consolidated joint ventures owned the following
properties:
(14) Segment Information
The Companys reportable segments consist of four distinct reporting and operational segments
within the greater Washington D.C, region in which it operates: Maryland, Washington, D.C.,
Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia. Prior to 2011, the Company had reported its properties
located in Washington, D.C. within its Northern Virginia reporting segment. However, due to the
Companys growth within the Washington, D.C. region, it has altered its internal structure, which
includes changing the Companys internal decision making process regarding its Washington, D.C.
properties. Therefore, the Company feels it is appropriate to separate the properties owned in
Washington, D.C. into its own reporting segment.
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on the operating results of the
properties located within each segment, which excludes large non-recurring gains and losses, gains
from sale of real estate assets, interest expense, general and administrative costs, acquisition
costs or any other indirect corporate expense to the segments. In addition, the segments do not
have significant non-cash items other than straight-line and deferred market rent amortization
reported in their operating results. There are no inter-segment sales or transfers recorded between
segments.
24
Table of Contents
The results of operations for the Companys four reportable segments are as follows (dollars
in thousands):
25
Table of Contents
(15) Subsequent Events
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a joint venture with an affiliate
of the Akridge Company. On October 12, 2011, the joint venture acquired a property located in
Washington, D.C. at 1200 17th Street, NW for $39.6 million. The property currently consists of a
land parcel that contains an 85,000 square foot office building. The joint venture intends to
demolish the existing building and develop a new Class A 170,000 square foot office building.
Construction is currently expected to commence in 2012 and is expected to be completed in late
2014. The Company funded its share of the purchase price through a $20.0 million mortgage, a draw
on its unsecured revolving credit facility and available cash. The Company anticipates owning a 95%
interest in the joint venture when it is fully capitalized.
26
Table of Contents
The following discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The discussion and analysis is derived from
the consolidated operating results and activities of First Potomac Realty Trust.
First Potomac Realty Trust (the Company) is a leader in the ownership, management,
development and redevelopment of office and industrial properties in the greater Washington, D.C.
region. The Company separates its properties into four distinct segments, which it refers to as the
Maryland, Washington, D.C., Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia reporting segments. The Company
strategically focuses on acquiring and redeveloping properties that it believes can benefit from
its intensive property management and seeks to reposition these properties to increase their
profitability and value. The Companys portfolio contains a mix of single-tenant and multi-tenant
office and industrial properties as well as business parks. Office properties are single-story and
multi-story buildings that are used primarily for office use; business parks contain buildings with
office features combined with some industrial property space; and industrial properties generally
are used as warehouse, distribution or manufacturing facilities.
References in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements to we, our or
First Potomac, refer to the Company and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
The Company conducts its business through First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership;
the Companys operating partnership (the Operating Partnership). The Company is the sole general
partner of, and, as of September 30, 2011, owned a 94.5% interest in, the Operating Partnership.
The remaining interests in the Operating Partnership, which are presented as noncontrolling
interests in the Operating Partnership in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements, are limited partnership interests, some of which are owned by several of the
Companys executive officers and trustees who contributed properties and other assets to the
Company upon its formation, and other unrelated parties.
At September 30, 2011, the Company wholly-owned or had a controlling interest in properties
totaling 13.9 million square feet and had a noncontrolling ownership interest in properties
totaling an additional 0.5 million square feet through four unconsolidated joint ventures. The
Company also owned land that can accommodate approximately 2.4 million square feet of additional
development. The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from leases of space within its
properties. As of September 30, 2011, the Companys largest tenant was the U.S. Government, which
along with government contractors, accounted for over 20% of the Companys total annualized rental
revenue. The U.S Government also accounted for approximately 30% of the Companys outstanding
accounts receivables at September 30, 2011. The Company operates so as to qualify as a real estate
investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes.
The primary source of the Companys revenue and earnings is rent received from customers under
long-term (generally three to ten years) operating leases at its properties, including
reimbursements from customers for certain operating costs. Additionally, the Company may generate
earnings from the sale of assets either outright or contributed into joint ventures.
The Companys long-term growth will principally be driven by its ability to:
Executive Summary
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company incurred a net loss of $3.7 million
compared with a net loss of $2.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The
increase in the Companys net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 is
primarily due to an increase in acquisition costs and interest expense as the Company issued
additional debt and assumed several mortgages in its acquisition of properties in the fourth
quarter of 2010 and the first nine months of 2011, which resulted in a higher weighted average
interest rate of its outstanding debt. These additional costs were partially offset by changes in
the fair value of various contingent consideration obligations.
27
Table of Contents
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company incurred a net loss of $6.9 million
compared with a net loss of $5.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The
increase in the Companys net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the
same period in 2010 is primarily due to an increase in acquisition costs and impairment charges.
The Company acquired six properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, incurring $4.5
million in acquisition costs, compared with two property acquisitions during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, incurring $2.0 million in acquisition costs. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, the Company incurred $5.8 million of impairment charges compared with $4.0 of
impairment charges incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the third
quarter of 2011, the Company incurred a $3.1 million impairment charge on a property in its
Maryland reporting segment that reflects the Companys shorter anticipated holding period for the
property. The additional impairment charges incurred during the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010 relate to properties that were subsequently disposed of by the Company and are
reflected as discontinued operations on the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
The Companys funds from operations (FFO) were $10.6 million, or $0.21 per diluted share,
and $32.3 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2011, respectively, compared with FFO of $8.1 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, and $26.3
million, or $0.74 per diluted share, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively. The increase in FFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared
with the same periods in 2010 is due to an increase in the Companys net operating income. FFO is a
non-GAAP financial measure. For a description of FFO, including why management believes its
presentation is useful and a reconciliation of FFO to net loss attributable to First Potomac Realty
Trust, see Funds From Operations.
Significant Transactions Since June 30, 2011
28
Table of Contents
Properties:
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company acquired two properties for an aggregate
purchase price of $61.9 million. The Company acquired Greenbrier Towers, located in its Southern
Virginia reporting segment, at an anticipated capitalization rate of
8.9% and 1005 First Street,
NE, located in its Washington, D.C. reporting segment, at an anticipated capitalization rate of
6.5%. The following sets forth certain information for the Companys consolidated properties by
segment as of September 30, 2011 (including properties in development and redevelopment, dollars in
thousands):
WASHINGTON, D.C.
29
Table of Contents
MARYLAND REGION
30
Table of Contents
NORTHERN VIRGINIA REGION
31
Table of Contents
SOUTHERN VIRGINIA REGION
32
Table of Contents
Development and Redevelopment Activity
The Company constructs office buildings, business parks and/or industrial buildings on a
build-to-suit basis or with the intent to lease upon completion of construction. Also, the Company
owns developable land that can accommodate 2.4 million square feet of additional building space.
Below is a summary of the approximate building square footage that can be developed on the
Companys developable land and the Companys current development and redevelopment activity
(amounts in thousands):
The Company anticipates the majority of the development and redevelopment efforts on all
the Companys projects will continue throughout the remainder of 2011 and into 2012.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had completed development and redevelopment activities that
have yet to be placed in service on 243 thousand square feet, at a cost of $16.1 million, in its
Northern Virginia reporting segment and 39 thousand square feet, at a cost of $1.2 million, in its
Southern Virginia reporting segment. The majority of the costs on the construction projects to be
placed in service relate to redevelopment activities at Three Flint Hill in the Companys Northern
Virginia reporting segment, which were completed in the third quarter of 2011 at a cost of $11.0
million. The Company will place completed construction activities in service upon the shorter of a
tenant taking occupancy or twelve months from substantial completion.
Lease Expirations
Approximately 13% of the Companys annualized base rent is scheduled to expire in the
remainder of 2011 and 2012, excluding month-to-month leases. Current tenants may not renew their
leases upon the expiration of their terms. If non-renewals or terminations occur, the Company may
not be able to locate qualified replacement tenants and, as a result, could lose a significant
source of revenue while remaining responsible for the payment of its financial obligations.
Moreover, the terms of a renewal or new lease, including the amount of rent, may be less favorable
to the Company than the current lease terms, or the Company may be forced to provide tenant
improvements at its expense or provide other concessions or additional services to maintain or
attract tenants. We continually strive to increase our portfolio occupancy, and the amount of
vacant space in our portfolio at any given time may impact our willingness to reduce rental rates
or provide greater concessions to retain existing tenants and attract new tenants. The Companys
management continually monitors its portfolio on a regional and per property basis to assess market
trends, including vacancy, comparable deals and transactions, and other business and economic
factors that may influence our leasing decisions. During the three months ended September 30, 2011,
the Company had an 88% retention rate, based on square footage. The weighted average rental rate on
the Companys renewed leases increased 7.3% compared with the expiring leases.
33
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth a summary schedule of the lease expirations at the Companys
properties for leases in place as of September 30, 2011 for each of the ten full calendar years
beginning January 1, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that require the Company to make certain
estimates and assumptions. Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that require
subjective or complex judgments and are the policies and estimates that the Company deems most
important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results of operations. It is possible
that the use of different reasonable estimates or assumptions in making these judgments could
result in materially different amounts being reported in its condensed consolidated financial
statements. The Companys critical accounting policies and estimates relate to revenue recognition,
including evaluation of the collectability of accounts receivable, impairment of long-lived assets,
purchase accounting for acquisitions of real estate, derivative instruments and share-based
compensation.
The following is a summary of certain aspects of these critical accounting policies and
estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company generates substantially all of its revenue from leases on its office and
industrial properties as well as business parks. The Company recognizes rental revenue on a
straight-line basis over the term of its leases, which includes fixed-rate renewal periods leased
at below market rates at acquisition or inception. Accrued straight-line rents represent the
difference between rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
respective lease agreements and the rental payments contractually due for leases that contain
abatement or fixed periodic increases. The Company considers current information, credit quality,
historical trends, economic conditions and other events regarding the tenants ability to pay their
obligations in determining if amounts due from tenants, including accrued straight-line rents, are
ultimately collectible. The uncollectible portion of the amounts due from tenants, including
accrued straight-line rents, is charged to property operating expense in the period in which the
determination is made.
Tenant leases generally contain provisions under which the tenants reimburse the Company for a
portion of property operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred by the Company. Such
reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred. The Company records
a provision for losses on estimated uncollectible accounts receivable based on its analysis of risk
of loss on specific accounts. Lease termination fees are recognized on the date of termination
when the related lease or portion thereof is cancelled, the collectability of the fee is reasonably
assured and the Company has possession of the terminated space.
34
Table of Contents
Accounts and Notes Receivable
The Company must make estimates of the collectability of its accounts and notes receivable
related to minimum rent, deferred rent, tenant reimbursements, lease termination fees and interest
and other income. The Company specifically analyzes accounts and notes receivable and historical
bad debt experience, tenant concentrations, tenant creditworthiness and current economic trends
when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. These estimates
have a direct impact on the Companys net income as a higher required allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable will result in lower net income. The uncollectible portion of the amounts due
from tenants, including straight-line rents, is charged to property operating expense in the period
in which the determination is made.
Investments in Real Estate and Real Estate Entities
Investments in real estate and real estate entities are initially recorded at fair value and
carried at initial cost, less accumulated depreciation and, when appropriate, impairment losses.
Improvements and replacements are capitalized at fair value when they extend the useful life,
increase capacity, or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and maintenance are charged to
expense when incurred.
Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the Companys assets, by class, are as follows:
The Company regularly reviews market conditions for possible impairment of a propertys
carrying value. When circumstances such as adverse market conditions, changes in managements
intended holding period or potential sale to a third party indicate a possible impairment of the
fair value of a property, an impairment analysis is performed. The Company assesses potential
impairments based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges)
expected to result from the propertys use and eventual disposition. This estimate is based on
projections of future revenues, expenses, capital improvement costs, expected holding periods and
capitalization rates. These cash flows consider factors such as expected market trends and leasing
prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment
exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment based on
forecasted undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying
value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. The Company is required to make estimates
as to whether there are impairments in the carrying values of its investments in real estate.
Further, the Company will record an impairment loss if it expects to dispose of a property, in the
near term, at a price below carrying value. In such an event, the Company will record an impairment
loss based on the difference between a propertys carrying value and its projected sales price,
less any estimated costs to sell.
The Company will classify a building as held-for-sale in the period in which it has made the
decision to dispose of the building, a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed
under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash and no significant
financing contingencies exist that could cause the transaction not to be completed in a timely
manner. The Company will classify any impairment loss, together with the buildings operating
results, as discontinued operations in its consolidated statements of operations for all periods
presented and classify the assets and related liabilities as held-for-sale in its consolidated
balance sheets in the period the sale criteria are met. Interest expense is reclassified to
discontinued operations only to the extent the held-for-sale property is secured by specific
mortgage debt and the mortgage debt will not be transferred to another property owned by the
Company after the disposition.
The Company recognizes the fair value, if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate
the fair value, of any liability for conditional asset retirement obligations when incurred, which
is generally upon acquisition, construction, development or redevelopment and/or through the normal
operation of the asset.
The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred on qualifying expenditures for real estate
assets under development or redevelopment while being readied for their intended use in accordance
with accounting requirements regarding capitalization of interest. The Company will capitalize
interest when qualifying expenditures for the asset have been made, activities necessary to get the
asset ready for its intended use are in progress and interest costs are being incurred. Capitalized
interest also includes interest associated with expenditures incurred to acquire developable land
while development activities are in progress and interest on the direct compensation costs of the
Companys construction personnel who manage the development
and redevelopment projects, but only to the extent the employees time can be allocated to a
project. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, capitalized compensation costs
were immaterial. Capitalization of interest will end when the asset is substantially complete and
ready for its intended use, but no later than one year from completion of major construction
activity, if the property is not occupied. Capitalized interest is depreciated over the useful life
of the underlying assets, commencing when those assets are placed into service.
35
Table of Contents
Purchase Accounting
Acquisitions of rental property from third parties are accounted for at fair value. Any
liabilities assumed or incurred are recorded at their fair value at the time of acquisition. The
fair value of the acquired property is allocated between land and building (on an as-if vacant
basis) based on managements estimate of the fair value of those components for each type of
property and to tenant improvements based on the depreciated replacement cost of the tenant
improvements, which approximates their fair value. The fair value of the in-place leases is
recorded as follows:
The Companys determination of these fair values requires it to estimate market rents for each
of the leases and make certain other assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the rental
revenue, and depreciation and amortization expense recognized for these leases and associated
intangible assets and liabilities.
Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate
changes. The Company may enter into derivative agreements to mitigate exposure to unexpected
changes in interest rates and may use interest rate protection or cap agreements to reduce the
impact of interest rate changes. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative
purposes and intends to enter into derivative agreements only with counterparties that it believes
have a strong credit rating to mitigate the risk of counterparty default or insolvency.
The Company may designate a derivative as either a hedge of the cash flows from a debt
instrument or anticipated transaction (cash flow hedge) or a hedge of the fair value of a debt
instrument (fair value hedge). All derivatives are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair
value. For effective hedging relationships, the change in the fair value of the assets or
liabilities is recorded within equity (cash flow hedge), or through earnings (fair value hedge).
Ineffective portions of derivative transactions will result in changes in fair value recognized in
earnings. The Company records its proportionate share of unrealized gains or losses on its
derivative instruments associated with its unconsolidated joint ventures within equity and
Investment in affiliates. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately
reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in
the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect
of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual inputs and guarantees.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. For options awards, the Company uses a
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility is based on an assessment of the Companys
realized volatility over the preceding five years, which is equivalent to the awards expected life.
The expected term represents the period of time the options are anticipated to remain outstanding
as well as the Companys historical experience for groupings of employees that have similar
behavior and considered separately for valuation purposes. For non-vested share awards that vest
over a predetermined time period, the Company uses the outstanding share price at the date of
issuance to fair value the awards. For non-vested shares awards that vest based on performance
conditions, the Company uses a Monte Carlo simulation (risk-neutral approach) to determine the
value and derived service period of each tranche. The expense associated with the share-based
awards will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services
in exchange for the award the requisite service period (usually the
vesting period). The fair value for all share-based payment transactions are recognized as a
component of income from continuing operations.
36
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 with the Three and Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2010
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company acquired a building at One Fair
Oaks; two buildings at Cedar Hill; a building at Merrill Lynch; a building at 840 First Street, NE;
two buildings at Greenbrier Towers and a building at 1005 First Street, NE for an aggregate
purchase cost of $251.5 million.
During 2010, the Company acquired the following consolidated properties: a building at Three
Flint Hill; a building at 500 First Street, NW; a building at Battlefield Corporate Center; two
buildings at Redland Corporate Center; two buildings at Atlantic Corporate Park; a building at 1211
Connecticut Ave, NW; a building at 440 First Street, NW and a building at 7458 Candlewood Road for
an aggregate purchase cost of $286.2 million.
Collectively, the properties are referred to as the Acquired Properties.
The term Existing Portfolio refers to all consolidated properties owned by the Company for
the entirety of the periods presented.
Total Revenues
Total revenues are summarized as follows:
Rental Revenue
Rental revenue is comprised of contractual rent, the impact of straight-line revenue and the
amortization of deferred market rent assets and liabilities representing above and below market
rate leases at acquisition. Rental revenue increased $8.6 million and $22.4 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010,
which was due to increased revenues from the Companys recent acquisitions. The Acquired Properties
contributed $8.8 million and $22.9 million of additional rental revenue for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Rental revenue for the Existing Portfolio decreased
$0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively,
compared with the same periods in 2010, due to an increase in vacancy. The weighted average
occupancy of the Existing Portfolio was 83.1% for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 compared
with 85.0% for the same period in 2010. The Company expects aggregate rental revenues to increase
for the remainder of 2011 due to a full-year of revenues from the properties acquired in 2010 and
additional properties acquired in 2011.
The increase in rental revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared
with 2010 includes $2.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively, for the Maryland reporting segment,
$3.7 million and $11.0 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C. reporting segment, $2.3
million and $4.3 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia reporting segment and $0.6
million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the Southern Virginia reporting segment.
37
Table of Contents
Tenant Reimbursements and Other Revenues
Tenant reimbursements and other revenues include operating and common area maintenance costs
reimbursed by the Companys tenants as well as other incidental revenues such as lease termination
payments, construction management fees and late fees. Tenant reimbursements and other revenues
increased $2.8 million and $5.0 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. The increase is due to the Acquired
Properties, which contributed $2.5 million and $5.9 million of additional tenant
reimbursements and other revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. For the Existing Portfolio, tenant
reimbursements and other revenues increased $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30,
2011 and decreased $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same
periods in 2010. The increase in tenant reimbursements and other revenues for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 is due to an increase in
construction management fees and termination fees. The Existing Portfolios decrease in tenant
reimbursements and other revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the
same period in 2010 is due to a reduction in recoverable expenses, primarily relating to snow and
ice removal costs incurred in 2010. The Company expects tenant reimbursements and other revenues to
increase for the remainder of 2011 due to a full-year of recoverable operating expenses from
properties acquired in 2010 and 2011.
The increase in tenant reimbursements and other revenues for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 include $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the
Maryland reporting segment, $1.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C.
reporting segment and $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia
reporting segment. For the Southern Virginia reporting segment, tenant reimbursements and other
revenues slightly decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and increased $0.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010.
Total Expenses
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses are summarized as follows:
Property operating expenses increased $3.5 million and $7.2 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. The
increase is due to the Acquired Properties, which contributed $3.0 million and $7.7 million of
additional property operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively. For the Existing Portfolio, property operating expenses increased $0.5 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 primarily due to a
decline in reserves for bad debt expense during the three months ended September 30, 2010, which
was related to the reversal of reserves that were previously recorded as a result of the
uncertainty associated with a tenant renewal. Property operating expenses, for the Existing
Portfolio, decreased $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to a
decline in snow and ice removal costs. The Company expects property operating expenses to increase
for the remainder of the year compared with prior year results due primarily to the Companys new
acquisitions.
The increase in property operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2011 compared with 2010 includes $0.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the Maryland
reporting segment, $1.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C. reporting
segment, $0.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia reporting segment,
and $0.8 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 for the Southern
Virginia reporting segment.
Real estate taxes and insurance expense increased $1.3 million and $2.9 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. The
Acquired Properties contributed an increase in real estate taxes and insurance expense of $1.2
million and $3.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. For
the Existing Portfolio, real estate taxes and insurance expense increased $0.1 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 and decreased $0.4 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010. During the first half of 2011, real estate
taxes and insurance expenses were lower compared with 2010 due to lower real estate assessments and
real estate tax rates, however, the Company recorded an increase in real estate taxes and insurance
expense during the third quarter of 2011 compared with 2010 to reflect an increase in real estate
tax
assessments on its properties.
38
Table of Contents
Real estate taxes and insurance expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011
compared with 2010, increased $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the Maryland
reporting segment, $0.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C. reporting
segment and $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia reporting
segment. For the Southern Virginia reporting segment, real estate taxes and insurance expense
increased slightly for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010 and decreased
$0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010.
Other Operating Expenses
General and administrative expenses are summarized as follows:
General and administrative expenses increased $0.9 million and $1.7 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010
primarily due to an increase in employee compensation costs as the Company had 165 employees at
September 30, 2011 compared with 145 employees at September 30, 2010. The increase in employee
compensation costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 was
partially offset by a decrease in non-cash, share-based compensation expense.
Acquisition costs are summarized as follows:
Acquisition costs increased $1.4 million and $2.4 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. During 2011, the
Company acquired six properties, including two properties acquired in the third quarter of 2011,
compared with two properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, both of
which were acquired in the second quarter of 2010.
Depreciation and amortization expenses are summarized as follows:
39
Table of Contents
Depreciation and amortization expense includes depreciation of real estate assets and
amortization of intangible assets and leasing commissions. Depreciation and amortization expense
increased $5.5 million and $14.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010 primarily due to the Companys recent
acquisitions. The Acquired Properties contributed additional depreciation and amortization expense
of $5.6 million and $14.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, compared with 2010. The Existing Portfolio had a $0.1 million decrease in
depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due
to the acceleration of depreciation and amortization related to intangible assets in prior periods.
Depreciation and amortization expense attributable to the Existing Portfolio increased $0.7 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 primarily due to the
disposal of assets from tenants that vacated during the year prior to reaching the full term of
their lease. The Company anticipates depreciation and amortization expense to increase the
remainder of 2011 due to recognizing a full-year of depreciation and amortization expense for
properties acquired in 2010 and additional properties acquired in 2011.
Impairment of real estate asset is summarized as follows:
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company incurred a $3.1 million impairment charge
on its Airpark Place property, located in its Maryland reporting segment, which reflects the
Companys shorter anticipated holding period for the property. The Company recorded additional
impairment charges related to disposed properties, which are reflected within discontinued
operations in the Companys consolidated statements of operations, of $2.7 million in the first
quarter of 2011 and $3.4 million and $4.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively.
Changes in contingent consideration related to acquisition of property are summarized as
follows:
On March 25, 2011, the Company acquired 840 First Street, NE, in Washington, D.C. for an
aggregate purchase price of $90.0 million, with up to $10.0 million of additional consideration
payable in Operating Partnership units upon the terms of a lease renewal by the buildings sole
tenant or the re-tenanting of the property through November 2013. Based on assessment of the
probability of renewal and anticipated lease rates, the Company recorded a contingent consideration
obligation of $9.4 million at acquisition. In July 2011, the buildings sole tenant renewed its
lease through August 2023 on the entire building with the exception of two floors. As a result, the
Company issued 544,673 Operating Partnership units to satisfy $7.1 million of its contingent
consideration obligation. The Company recognized a $1.5 million gain associated with the issuance
of the additional units, which represented the difference between the contractual value of the
units and the fair value of the units at the date of issuance. At September 30, 2011, the remaining
contingent consideration obligation was $0.7 million, which may result in the issuance of
additional units dependent upon the leasing of any of the vacant space. The fair value of the
contingent consideration obligation was determined based on several probability weighted discounted
cash flow scenarios that projected stabilization being achieved at certain timeframes. The fair
value was based, in part, on significant inputs, which are not observable in the market, thus
representing a Level 3 measurement in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
As part of the consideration for the Companys 2009 acquisition of Ashburn Center, the Company
is obligated to record contingent consideration arising from a fee agreement entered into with the
seller in which the Company will be obligated to pay additional consideration if certain returns
are achieved over the five year term of the agreement or if the property is sold within the term of
the five year agreement. The Company initially recorded $0.7 million at the time of acquisition in
December 2009, which represented the fair value of the Companys potential obligation at
acquisition. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company was able to lease vacant space at
Ashburn Center faster than it had anticipated and, therefore, recorded additional contingent
consideration of $0.7 million that reflected an increase in the potential consideration that may be
owed to the seller. There was no significant change in the fair value of the contingent
consideration related to Ashburn Center during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
40
Table of Contents
Other Expenses, net
Interest expense is summarized as follows:
The Company seeks to employ cost-effective financing methods to fund its acquisitions,
development and redevelopment projects and to refinance its existing debt to provide greater
balance sheet flexibility or to take advantage of lower interest rates. The methods used to fund
the Companys activities impact the period-over-period comparisons of interest expense.
Interest expense increased $2.8 million and $5.0 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. At September 30, 2011,
the Company had $872.4 million of debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 5.1%
compared with $616.9 million of debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 5.0% at
September 30, 2010.
The increase in the Companys interest expense is primarily attributable to an increase in
mortgage interest expense, which increased $1.5 million and $4.1 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010 due to the
assumption of additional mortgages associated with the Companys 2011 and 2010 acquisitions. In
July 2011, the Company entered into a three-tranche $175.0 million unsecured term loan and used the
funds to pay down $117.0 million of the outstanding balance on its unsecured revolving credit
facility, to repay its $50.0 million secured term loan and for other general corporate purposes.
The unsecured term loan contributed additional interest expense of $0.9 million for both the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $50.0 million secured term loan, which was repaid
with funds from the issuance of the $175 million unsecured term loan, was entered into during the
fourth quarter of 2010 and contributed additional interest expense of $0.1 million and $1.1 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Also, the Company had
incurred additional deferred financing costs with the assumption and issuance of new debt and the
refinancing of its unsecured credit facility, which increased interest expense $0.3 million and
$0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with
the same periods in 2010.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company experienced a decrease in
interest expense associated with its unsecured revolving credit facility of $0.1 million and $0.2
million, respectively, as a higher outstanding balance on the facility was offset by a lower
applicable interest rate. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Companys
weighted average borrowings outstanding on its unsecured revolving credit facility was $133.9
million and $133.3 million, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.7% and 3.0%,
respectively, compared with weighted average borrowings of $125.7 million and $120.5 million with a
weighted average interest rate of 3.3% and 3.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively
The increase in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with
2010 was partially offset by a decrease of $0.5 million in interest expense associated with the
Companys Exchangeable Senior Notes as $20.1 million of the notes were repurchased in the second
quarter of 2010. In August 2011, the Company repaid its $20.0 million secured term loan with a draw
on its unsecured revolving credit facility, which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of
$0.1 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010. Also,
the Company recorded an increase in capitalized interest, as a result of an increase in
construction activities, of $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to interest rate
fluctuations on its variable rate debt. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had hedged $200.0
million of its variable rate debt through six interest rate swap agreements, including $150.0
million of variable rate debt that was hedged during the third quarter of 2011. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, the Company had fixed LIBOR on $85.0 million of variable rate debt
through two effective interest rate swap agreements, which both expired in August 2010. As a
result, interest expense related to the interest rate swap agreements increased $0.4 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 and decreased $0.5 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010.
41
Table of Contents
Interest and other income are summarized as follows:
In December 2010, the Company provided a $25.0 million subordinated loan to the owners of
950 F Street, NW, a 287,000 square-foot office building in Washington, D.C. The loan has a fixed
interest rate of 12.5%. In April 2011, the Company provided a $30.0 million subordinated loan to
the owners of Americas Square, a 461,000 square foot, Class A office complex in Washington, D.C.
The loan has a fixed interest rate of 9.0%. The Company recorded interest income related to these
loans of $1.5 million and $3.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively. The increase in interest and other income was partially offset by a $0.1 million and
$0.2 million decline in other income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, compared to 2010, related to income received from the Company subleasing its former
corporate office space. The Companys lease on its former corporate office space and the associated
sublease agreements expired on December 31, 2010.
Equity in losses of affiliates is summarized as follows:
Equity in losses of affiliates reflects the Companys ownership interest in the
operating results of the properties, in which, it does not have a controlling interest. The
increase in equity in losses of affiliates for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared
with 2010 reflects a higher aggregate loss generated by the properties owned by these ventures. The
decrease in equity in losses of affiliates for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to
2010 reflects a smaller aggregate loss generated by the properties owned by these ventures.
Gain on early retirement of debt is summarized as follows:
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company issued 0.9 million common shares in
exchange for retiring $13.03 million of Exchangeable Senior Notes and used available cash to retire
$7.02 million of its Exchangeable Senior Notes, which resulted in a gain of $0.2 million, net of
deferred financing costs and discounts. The Company did not have any other retirements of its
Exchangeable Senior Notes or other debt resulting in a gain or loss during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010.
42
Table of Contents
Benefit from Income Taxes
Benefit from income taxes is summarized as follows:
The Company owns four consolidated properties in Washington, D.C., 840 First Street, NE,
1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW, 440 First Street, NW and 1005 First Street, NE that are subject to
income-based franchise taxes as a result of conducting business in Washington, D.C. The Company
recorded a benefit from income taxes of $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The Company did not own any properties located in
Washington, D.C. that were subject to any Washington, D.C. income-based franchise taxes during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations is summarized as follows:
Discontinued operations reflect the operating results of Aquia Commerce Center I & II and
Gateway West (which were both sold in the second quarter of 2011), Old Courthouse Square (which was
sold in the first quarter of 2011), and Deer Park and 7561 Lindbergh Drive (which were both sold in
the second quarter of 2010). Gateway West, Old Courthouse Square, Deer Park and 7561 Lindbergh
Drive were located in the Companys Maryland reporting segment and Aquia Commerce Center I & II was
located in the Companys Northern Virginia reporting segment. For the three months ended September
30, 2010, the Company recorded a $3.4 million impairment charge related to its Old Courthouse
Square property, which was sold in 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
impairment charges associated with disposed properties were partially offset by gains on sale of
real estate properties of $2.0 million and 0.6 million, respectively. The Company has had, and will
have, no continuing involvement with these properties subsequent to their disposal.
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests is summarized as follows:
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests reflects the ownership interests in the
Companys net income or loss attributable to parties other than the Company. The change in net loss
attributable to noncontrolling interests can be attributed to an increase in net loss during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010.
43
Table of Contents
The percentage of the Operating Partnership owned by noncontrolling interests increased to
5.5% as of September 30, 2011 compared with 1.9% as of September 30, 2010, which was due to the
issuance of 1,418,715 Operating Partnership units to
partially fund the acquisition of 840 First Street, NE during the first quarter of 2011 and
the issuance of an additional 544,673 Operating Partnership units during the third quarter of 2011
to satisfy a contingent consideration obligation owed to the seller of 840 First Street, NE. At
September 30, 2011, the Company had entered into three joint ventures in which it had a controlling
interest and, therefore, consolidates the respective joint ventures operating results within in
consolidated statements of operations. At September 30, 2010, the Company did not have a
controlling interest in any joint ventures. The Company reflects the joint venture partners
operating results as net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests within its
statements of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the joint venture
partners aggregate share in the operating results of the Companys consolidated joint ventures was
a $7 thousand loss.
Same Property Net Operating Income
Same Property Net Operating Income (Same Property NOI), defined as operating revenues
(rental, tenant reimbursements and other revenues) less operating expenses (property operating
expenses, real estate taxes and insurance) from the properties whose period-over-period operations
can be viewed on a comparative basis , is a primary performance measure the Company uses to assess
the results of operations at its properties. Same Property NOI is a non-GAAP measure. As an
indication of the Companys operating performance, Same Property NOI should not be considered an
alternative to net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the Companys
Same Property NOI to net income from its consolidated statements of operations is presented below.
The Same Property NOI results exclude corporate-level expenses, as well as certain transactions,
such as the collection of termination fees, as these items vary significantly period-over-period
and thus impact trends and comparability. Also, the Company eliminates depreciation and
amortization expense, which are property level expenses, in computing Same Property NOI because
these are non-cash expenses that are based on historical cost accounting assumptions and management
believes these expenses do not offer the investor significant insight into the operations of the
property. This presentation allows management and investors to distinguish whether growth or
declines in net operating income are a result of increases or decreases in property operations or
the acquisition of additional properties. While this presentation provides useful information to
management and investors, the results below should be read in conjunction with the results from the
consolidated statements of operations to provide a complete depiction of total Company performance.
The Company also presents Same Property NOI results for each of its reporting segments, including
its Washington, D.C. reporting segment, which had one property owned for the entirety of the three
months September 30, 2011 and 2010.
44
Table of Contents
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 with the Three and Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2010
The following table of selected operating data provides the basis for our discussion of Same
Property NOI for the periods presented:
45
Table of Contents
Same Property NOI decreased $0.3 million, or 1.4%, and for the three months ended
September 30, 2011 and increased $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared
with the same periods in 2010. Total same property revenues slightly decreased for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 and decreased $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 compared with the same periods in 2010 due to an increase in vacancy. The increase in vacancy
for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was partially offset by an increase in rental rates
and construction management fees. The decrease in total same property revenues for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 was also attributable to a reduction in recoverable expenses due to lower
snow and ice removal costs. Compared with 2010, total same property expenses increased $0.3
million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 due to an increase in real estate taxes as
the third quarter of 2011 reflected higher tax assessments on several properties, and decreased
$1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to a reduction in snow and ice
removal costs and real estate taxes, which were the result of lower tax assessments from the
previous year.
Maryland
46
Table of Contents
Same Property NOI for the Maryland properties increased $0.3 million and $0.6 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in
2010. Total same property revenues increased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2011, as increases in rental rates and construction management fees offset an increase in vacancy,
and decreased $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to an increase in
vacancy. Total same property operating expenses for the Maryland properties decreased $0.2 million
and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared
with the same periods in 2010 due to lower reserves for bad debt expense and real estate taxes.
Total same property revenues also decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to a
reduction in snow and ice removal costs.
Northern Virginia
Same Property NOI for the Northern Virginia properties slightly decreased for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 and increased $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 compared with the same periods in 2010. Total same property revenues increased $0.3 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2011, due to an increase in rental rates, and slightly
decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as an increase in rental rates was offset
by a decline recoverable tenant expenses and non-cash revenue. Total same property operating
expenses increased $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, due to an increase
in real estate taxes, and decreased $0.2 million nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to lower
snow and ice removal costs.
47
Table of Contents
Southern Virginia
Same Property NOI for the Southern Virginia properties decreased $0.9 million and $0.7
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the
same periods in 2010. Total same property revenues decreased $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared the same periods in 2010 as
a result of an increase in vacancy, a significant portion of which is related to the downsizing of
the sole tenant at 1434 Crossways Boulevard. Total same property operating expenses slightly
increased for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as an increase in utilities was offset by
a decrease in reserves for anticipated bad debt expense, and decreased $0.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to a decline in real estate taxes, snow and ice
removal costs and reserves for anticipated bad debt expense.
48
Table of Contents
Washington, D.C.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||