|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the GPS DEF 14A filed Apr 7, 2009. CEO The terms of Mr. Murphys post-termination severance benefits were determined through the course of arms-length negotiations of his employment agreement. As part of these negotiations, the Committee considered competitive practice at selected peer group companies and general industry, accounting and tax implications, and the potential benefits that could be received at multiple future points in time using a wealth accumulation analysis. We entered into the termination of employment provisions in order to address competitive concerns when Mr. Murphy was recruited by providing fixed compensation amounts that would offset the potential risk of joining the Company and foregoing other opportunities. Enhanced benefits in the case of a change of control of the Company were also included for the same reasons and to help ensure retention of Mr. Murphy and continuity in the case of a potential or actual change of control. The Committee determined based on its analysis that the benefits and structure are well within normal competitive practice, reasonable and appropriate for the circumstances, and necessary to attract Mr. Murphy to the Company. The provisions are described in more detail on page 44.
34
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the GPS DEF 14A filed Apr 16, 2008. CEO The terms of Mr. Murphys post-termination severance benefits were determined through the course of arms-length negotiations of his employment agreement. As part of these negotiations, the Committee analyzed the same factors described above for executives other than the CEO in determining amounts payable and triggering events. We entered into the termination of employment provisions in order to address competitive concerns when Mr. Murphy was recruited by providing fixed compensation amounts that would offset the potential risk of joining the Company and foregoing other
37
Table of Contentsopportunities. Enhanced benefits in the case of a change of control of the Company were also included for the same reasons and to help ensure retention of Mr. Murphy and continuity in the case of a potential or actual change of control. The Committee determined based on its analysis that the benefits and structure are well within normal competitive practice, reasonable and appropriate for the circumstances, and necessary to attract Mr. Murphy to the Company. The provisions are described in more detail on page 48. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for GPS: |
| |||||||