Table of Contents      
Intro and Overview
     Introduction
     Business Overview
Trends and Forces
      Key Trends and Forces
Competition

Competition

Gap's three major brands target different customers with very differing merchandise mixes. As such, each brand competes with a different set of other retailers:

Gap's middle-of-the-road approach to providing basic pieces of apparel (T-shirts, khakis, blouses, jeans, etc.) at mid-range prices puts it in competition with stores such as American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) and Aeropostale (ARO):

Same Store Sales Growth %
Retailer 2006 2007 2008
Gap[3] (7.0%) (4.0%) (12%)
American Eagle Outfitters (AEO)[1] 12.0% 1.0% (10%)
Aeropostale (ARO)[2] 2.0% 3.3% 8.0%

Old Navy targets middle-class families who seek basic apparel and accessories at low prices and consequently competes with value-based department stores like Kohl's (KSS) and discounters such as Wal-Mart Stores (WMT). Old Navy has seen decreasing same store sales growth from 2006 to 2008, largely due to merchandising issues. Management believes that in time the brand will recover after refocusing the merchandising.

Same Store Sales Growth %
Retailer 2007 2008
Old Navy (7%) (17%)
Kohl's[4] (0.8%) (6.9%)
Wal-Mart[7] 1.6% 3.5%

[8] whereas the Gap, Inc. made $14.5 billion. The company does not do designer collaborations like The Gap; however Ralph Lauren Collection does a runway show twice a year (spring/summer and fall/winter), which heightens its luxury image. In addition, the company's brands cater to a wide range of incomes. Although Banana Republic is The Gap's near-luxury branch, its price point is still lower than that of the highest Ralph Lauren brands. Polo Ralph Lauren's exposure to multiple geographical regions and income levels lowers its exposure to factors such as recessions or spending decreases that can affect some segments more than others.

Same Store Sales Growth %
Retailer 2006 2007 2008
Banana Republic 0.0% 1% (10%)
Ralph Lauren[8] 6.4% 7.9% (5.2%)
J. Crew[9] 13.0% 5.6% (4.0%)


Note: A figure in parenthesis corresponds to negative growth, i.e. in 2007 Abercrombie & Fitch had a 1% decrease in same store sales.


Intro and Overview | Trends and Forces | Competition

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 AEO 2008 Annual Report pg. 17  
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 ARO 2008 Annual Report pg. 17  
  3. GPS 2008 Annual Report pg. 20  
  4. 4.0 4.1 KSS 2008 Annual Report pg. 18  
  5. KSS 2008 Annual Report pg. 10  
  6. GPS 2008 Annual Report pg. 21  
  7. 7.0 7.1 WMT 2008 Annual Report pg. EX-13  
  8. 8.0 8.1 RL 2008 Annual Report pg. F-56  
  9. 9.0 9.1 JCG 2008 Annual Report pg. 29  
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki