|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the GPS 10-Q filed Sep 7, 2006. Inventory Valuation Method In fiscal 2005, the company implemented a new inventory system and effective January 29, 2006 (the beginning of fiscal 2006), the company changed its inventory flow assumption from the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method to the weighted average cost method (WAC). The change in inventory accounting method did not have a material impact on the fiscal 2006 financial statements and because the effect on prior periods presented is not material, they have not been restated as would be required by SFAS 154. This excerpt taken from the GPS 10-Q filed Jun 2, 2006. Inventory Valuation Method In fiscal 2005, the company implemented a new inventory system and effective January 29, 2006 (the beginning of fiscal 2006), the company changed its inventory flow assumption from the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method to the weighted average cost method (WAC). The change in inventory accounting method did not have a material impact on the fiscal 2006 financial statements and because the effect on prior periods presented is not material, they have not been restated as would be required by SFAS 154. This excerpt taken from the GPS 10-K filed Mar 28, 2005. Inventory Valuation Method
Inventory is valued using the cost method, which values inventory at the lower of the actual cost or market. Cost is determined using the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method. Market is determined based on the estimated net realizable value, which generally is the merchandise selling price. We review our inventory levels in order to identify slow-moving merchandise and broken assortments (items no longer in stock in a sufficient range of sizes) and use markdowns to clear merchandise. Inventory value is reduced when the decision to mark down below cost is made. We estimate and accrue shortage for the period between the last physical count and the balance sheet date. Our shortage estimate can be affected by changes in merchandise mix and changes in actual shortage trends. The change in shortage expense as a percentage of cost of goods sold was an improvement of 0.2 percentage points, 1.4 percentage points and 0.1 percentage points for fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We experienced favorable shortage results from annual inventory counts completed during fiscal 2004 as we improved our loss prevention monitoring methods in the stores.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||