HPT » Topics » Opinion of Counsel for Underwriters.

This excerpt taken from the HPT 8-K filed Aug 12, 2009.
Opinion of Counsel for Underwriters.  At Closing Time, the Underwriters shall have received the favorable opinion, dated as of Closing Time, of Sidley Austin LLP, counsel for the Underwriters, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Underwriters.

 

In giving such opinion, Sidley Austin LLP may rely, as to all matters governed by the laws of jurisdictions other than the law of the State of New York, and the federal law of the United States, upon the opinions of counsel satisfactory to the Underwriters and may rely on an opinion dated the Closing Time of Venable LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the State of Maryland and on an opinion of Sullivan & Worcester LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  Such counsel may also state that, insofar as such opinion involves factual matters, they have relied, to the extent they deem proper, upon certificates of officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and certificates of public officials.

 

(e)                                 

This excerpt taken from the HPT 8-K filed Jun 19, 2009.
Opinion of Counsel for Underwriters.  At Closing Time, the Underwriters shall have received the favorable opinion, dated as of Closing Time, of Sidley Austin LLP, counsel for the Underwriters, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Underwriters and a statement to the following effect:  no facts have come to such counsel’s attention that have caused such counsel to believe that (i) the Registration Statement as of the “new effective date” with respect to the Underwriters of the Shares pursuant to, and within the meaning of, Rule

 

20



 

430B(f)(2) of the 1933 Act Regulations, contained an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading; (ii) the General Disclosure Package at the Applicable Time, included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (iii) the Prospectus, as of its date or at the Closing Time, included or includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; except in each case such counsel shall not be required to express any belief or make any statement with respect to the financial statements (including the notes) and supporting schedules, if any, thereto and other financial data contained or incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference therein or omitted therefrom.

 

In giving such opinion, Sidley Austin LLP may rely, as to all matters governed by the laws of jurisdictions other than the law of the State of New York, and the federal law of the United States, upon the opinions of counsel satisfactory to the Underwriters and may rely on an opinion dated the Closing Time of Venable LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the State of Maryland and on an opinion of Sullivan & Worcester LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  Such counsel may also state that, insofar as such opinion involves factual matters, they have relied, to the extent they deem proper, upon certificates of officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and certificates of public officials.

 

(e)                                 

This excerpt taken from the HPT 8-K filed Jun 13, 2006.
Opinion of Counsel for Underwriters.  At Closing Time, the Representatives shall have received the favorable opinion, dated as of Closing Time, of Sidley Austin LLP, counsel for the Underwriters, together with signed or reproduced copies of such letter for each of the other Underwriters with respect to the matters set forth in paragraphs (4), (5), (6) (with respect to the description of the Notes) and (14) of Exhibit A and a statement to the following effect:  no facts have come to such counsel’s attention that have caused such counsel to believe that (i) the Registration Statement, at the time of filing of the Company’s Annual Report or as of the “new effective date” with respect to the Underwriters of the Notes pursuant to, and within the meaning of, Rule 430B(f)(2) of the 1933 Act Regulations, contained an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading; (ii) the General Disclosure Package at the Applicable Time included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (iii) the Prospectus, as of its date or at the Closing Time, included or includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; except in each case such counsel shall not be required to express any belief or make any statement with respect to (a) the financial statements (including notes) and supporting schedules, if any, thereto, or other financial data included or incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference therein or omitted therefrom or (b) the statements contained in the exhibits to the Registration Statement, including the Trustee’s Statement of Eligibility on Form T-1.
This excerpt taken from the HPT 8-K filed Mar 23, 2006.
Opinion of Counsel for Underwriters.  At Closing Time, the Underwriters shall have received the favorable opinion, dated as of Closing Time, of Sidley Austin LLP, counsel for the Underwriters, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Underwriters and a statement to the following effect:  no facts have come to such counsel’s attention that have caused such counsel to believe that (i) the Registration Statement, at the time of filing of the Company’s Annual Report or as of the “new effective date” with respect to the Underwriters of the Shares pursuant to, and within the meaning of, Rule 430B(f)(2) of the 1933 Act Regulations, contained an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading; (ii) the General Disclosure Package, at the Applicable Time, when considered with the information agreed to in writing by the Company, the Selling Shareholder and the Underwriters as the information to be conveyed orally by the Underwriters to purchasers of the Shares at the Applicable Time, included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (iii) the Prospectus, as of its date or at the Closing Time, included or includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; except in each case such counsel shall not be required to express any belief or make any statement with respect to the financial statements (including the notes) and supporting schedules, if any, thereto and other financial data contained or incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference therein or omitted therefrom.

 

In giving such opinion, Sidley Austin LLP may rely, as to all matters governed by the laws of jurisdictions other than the law of the State of New York, and the federal law of the United States, upon the opinions of counsel satisfactory to the Underwriters and may rely on an opinion dated the Closing Time of Venable LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the State of Maryland and on an opinion of Sullivan & Worcester LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  Such counsel may also state that, insofar as such opinion involves factual matters, they have relied, to the extent they deem proper, upon certificates of officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and certificates of public officials.

 

(g)          

This excerpt taken from the HPT 8-K filed Jun 6, 2005.
Opinion of Counsel for Underwriters.  At Closing Time, the Underwriters shall have received the favorable opinion, dated as of Closing Time, of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, counsel for the Underwriters, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Underwriters and a statement to the following effect:  no fact has come to their attention that has caused them to believe that the Registration Statement (including any Rule 462(b) Registration Statement) or any post-effective amendment thereto (except for financial statements and supporting schedules and other financial data included therein or omitted therefrom, as to which they make no statement), at the time the Registration Statement (including any Rule 462(b) Registration Statement) or any post-effective amendment thereto (including the filing of the Company’s Annual Report with the Commission) became effective, contained an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading or

 

15



 

that the Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (except for financial statements and supporting schedules and other financial data included therein or omitted therefrom, as to which they make no statement), at the time the Prospectus was issued, at the time any such amended or supplemented prospectus was issued or at the Closing Time, included or includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

 

In giving such opinion, such counsel may rely, as to all matters governed by the laws of jurisdictions other than the law of the State of New York, and the federal law of the United States, upon the opinions of counsel satisfactory to the Underwriters and may rely on an opinion dated the Closing Time of Venable LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the State of Maryland and on an opinion of Sullivan & Worcester LLP as to matters governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  Such counsel may also state that, insofar as such opinion involves factual matters, they have relied, to the extent they deem proper, upon certificates of officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and certificates of public officials.

 

(e)         

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki