|
|
 | | | |
- close
- close
- close
- close
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed May 11, 2009. Cash and
Cash Equivalents
As of April 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009, cash and cash
equivalents were $32 million and $67 million,
respectively. The lower cash and cash equivalents as of
April 4, 2009 was primarily the result of net capital
expenditures of $55 million, payments of $21 million
for debt amendment fees associated with the amendments of the
Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Accounts Receivable
Securitization Facility, repayments of $19 million on the
Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility and $58 million
related to other uses of working capital partially offset by
$109 million of net borrowings under the Revolving Loan
Facility and $9 million of net borrowings on notes payable.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed Oct 31, 2008. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, cash
and cash equivalents were $86 million and
$174 million, respectively. The lower cash and cash
equivalents as of September 27, 2008 was primarily the
result of net capital expenditures of $99 million,
$30 million of stock repurchases, the acquisition of a
sewing operation in Thailand for $10 million and
$19 million related to other uses of working capital
partially offset by $52 million of net borrowings on notes
payable and the receipt from Sara Lee of $18 million in
cash.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed Aug 1, 2008. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007, cash and
cash equivalents were $97 million and $174 million,
respectively. The lower cash and cash equivalents as of
June 28, 2008 was primarily the result of net capital
expenditures of $64 million, $11 million of stock
repurchases, the acquisition of a sewing operation in Thailand
for $10 million and $49 million related to other uses
of working capital partially offset by $39 million of net
borrowings on notes payable and the receipt from Sara Lee of
$18 million in cash.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed May 7, 2008. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of March 29, 2008 and December 29, 2007, cash and
cash equivalents were $121 million and $174 million,
respectively. The lower cash and cash equivalents as of
March 29, 2008 was primarily the result of net capital
expenditures of $21 million, $8 million of stock
repurchases, $6 million of net repayments on notes payable
and $18 million related to other uses of working capital.
These excerpts taken from the HBI 10-K filed Feb 19, 2008. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, cash
and cash equivalents were $174 million and
$156 million, respectively. The higher cash and cash
equivalents as of December 29, 2007 was primarily the
result of management of working capital, partially offset by
lower net income, the repayment of debt under credit facilities
and the purchase of 1.6 million shares of our common stock
in 2007.
Cash and Cash Equivalents As of December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, cash and cash equivalents were $174 million and $156 million, respectively. The higher cash and cash equivalents as of December 29, 2007 was primarily the result of management of working capital, partially offset by lower net income, the repayment of debt under credit facilities and the purchase of 1.6 million shares of our common stock in 2007. This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed Nov 5, 2007. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, cash
and cash equivalents were $176 million and
$156 million, respectively. The higher cash and cash
equivalents as of September 29, 2007 was primarily the
result of better management of working capital and the
elimination of net transactions with parent companies and
related entities subsequent to the spin off from Sara Lee,
partially offset by lower net income and the repayment of debt
under credit facilities in 2007.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed Aug 3, 2007. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of June 30, 2007 and December 30, 2006, cash and
cash equivalents were $176 million and $156 million,
respectively. The higher cash and cash equivalents as of
June 30, 2007 was primarily the result of the elimination
of net transactions with parent companies and related entities
subsequent to the spin off from Sara Lee, partially offset by
lower net income and the repayment of debt under credit
facilities in 2007.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed May 14, 2007. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of March 31, 2007 and December 30, 2006, cash and
cash equivalents were $149 million and $156 million,
respectively. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents as of
March 31, 2007 was primarily the result of changes in
working capital balances and a $42 million pension
contribution.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 8-K filed Nov 29, 2006. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
At the end of fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006, cash and cash
equivalents were $674.2 million, $1.1 billion and
$298.3 million, respectively. The decrease in cash and cash
equivalents at the end of fiscal 2006 was primarily the result
of a $1.0 billion sweep of cash from our accounts by Sara
Lee in anticipation of the spin off. The fiscal 2006 balance was
also impacted by a $275 million bank overdraft which was
classified as a current liability. As part of Sara Lee, we
participated in Sara Lee’s cash pooling arrangements under
which positive and negative cash balances are netted within
geographic regions.
The recapitalization undertaken in conjunction with the spin off
resulted in a reduction in cash and cash equivalents. In periods
after the spin off, our primary source of liquidity will be cash
provided from operating activities and availability under our
revolving loan facility described below.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-Q filed Nov 13, 2006. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of September 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006, cash and
cash equivalents were $209 million and $298 million,
respectively. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents as of
September 30, 2006 was primarily the result of transactions
associated with the spin off. The September 30, 2006
balance will be reduced as we remit approximately
$26 million to Sara Lee to settle accounts as of the spin
off date. The July 1, 2006 balance was also impacted by a
$275 million bank overdraft which was classified as a
current liability. As part of Sara Lee, we participated in Sara
Lee’s cash pooling arrangements under which positive and
negative cash balances are netted within geographic regions. The
recapitalization undertaken in conjunction with the spin off
resulted in a reduction in cash and cash equivalents. In periods
after the spin off, our primary sources of liquidity will be
cash provided from operating activities and availability under
our revolving loan facility described below.
This excerpt taken from the HBI 10-K filed Sep 28, 2006. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
At the end of fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006, cash and cash
equivalents were $674.2 million, $1.1 billion and
$298.3 million, respectively. The decrease in cash and cash
equivalents at the end of fiscal 2006 was primarily the result
of a $1.0 billion sweep of cash from our accounts by Sara
Lee in anticipation of the spin off. The fiscal 2006 balance was
also impacted by a $275 million bank overdraft which was
classified as a current liability. As part of Sara Lee, we
participated in Sara Lee’s cash pooling arrangements under
which positive and negative cash balances are netted within
geographic regions.
The recapitalization undertaken in conjunction with the spin off
resulted in a reduction in cash and cash equivalents. In periods
after the spin off, our primary source of liquidity will be cash
provided from operating activities and availability under our
revolving loan facility described below.
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the HBI 8-K filed Sep 5, 2006. (g) Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. A significant portion of our cash and cash equivalents are in the Company’s bank accounts that are part of Sara Lee’s global cash funding system. With respect to accounts in the Sara Lee global cash funding system, the bank has a right to offset the accounts of the Company against the other Sara Lee accounts. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||
