|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the HBI DEF 14A filed Mar 10, 2008. Material
Features of the AIP
Purpose. The purpose of the AIP is to motivate
performance and to advance the interests of Hanesbrands by
linking a portion of the annual compensation paid to
participants to the achievement of financial objectives and key
performance indicators, while contributing to increased
long-term stockholder value. The AIP provides annual bonuses
designed to satisfy the conditions for performance-based
compensation under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
that qualifies for an exemption from Section 162(m)s
$1 million limit on deductible compensation.
Eligible Participants. Eligible participants
include all executive officers and each other employee of
Hanesbrands who has been selected to participate in the AIP, and
in 2007 consisted of approximately 960 employees.
Incentive Pool. Under the AIP, the
Compensation Committee will grant annual incentive award
opportunities to key employees of Hanesbrands. Each annual
incentive award will be paid out of an incentive pool
established for a performance period. Typically, the performance
period will be our fiscal year. The
Table of Contents
incentive pool will equal 3.0% of Hanesbrands operating
income for the performance period. Our operating income is our
operating income for the applicable performance period as
reported in our income statement and as adjusted to eliminate
the effects of charges for restructurings, discontinued
operations, extraordinary items, other unusual or non-recurring
items, and the cumulative effect of tax or accounting changes.
Individual Awards. Within 90 days of the
start of a performance period, the Compensation Committee will
allocate a percentage of the incentive pool to participants that
the Compensation Committee believes may be subject to the
limitations of Section 162(m). In no event may more than
40% of the total pool for a performance period be allocated to
any one participant. A participants allocation of the
incentive pool is the maximum potential award for
Internal Revenue Code purposes. Awards made under the AIP to our
named executive officers in 2007 were below the maximum
potential awards, and are reported in the Summary Compensation
Table appearing below and discussed in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section below. The actual award
attributable to any performance period may be reduced before
payment as discussed in the next paragraph.
Award Payment and Reduction. At the end of
each performance period, each named executive officers
incentive award will be certified by the Compensation Committee
based on the employees allocated portion of the incentive
pool and the attainment of specified performance measures. The
Compensation Committee may reduce (but in no event may increase)
the amount payable to any executive officer based upon financial
and non-financial goals established by the Compensation
Committee discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section below.
Payment of any award shall be made in cash (or in stock or
stock-based awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan). Employees
also may elect to defer payments pursuant to the terms of any
deferred compensation plan then in effect.
The Compensation Committee may make retroactive adjustments to,
and employees, including named executive officers, would be
required to reimburse us for, any cash or equity-based incentive
compensation paid to employees where such compensation was
predicated upon achieving certain financial results that were
substantially the subject of a restatement, if as a result of
the restatement it is determined that the employees otherwise
would not have been paid such compensation, regardless of
whether or not the restatement resulted from the employees
misconduct. While the foregoing decision is made in the
discretion of the Compensation Committee, the AIP provides that
Hanesbrands shall, to the extent permitted by governing law,
require reimbursement of any cash or equity based incentive
compensation paid to any named executive officer where:
(i) the payment was predicated upon the achievement of
certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of
a substantial restatement, and (ii) in the view of the
Compensation Committee the named executive officer engaged in
fraud or misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for
the substantial restatement.
The Compensation Committee may make retroactive adjustments and
seek reimbursement for any AIP payment previously paid to a
participating employee where a participating employee breaches
any confidentiality, proprietary information, or non-compete
provisions of any agreement or plan then in effect between
Hanesbrands and the employee.
Administration. The AIP is administered by the
Compensation Committee. Each member of the Compensation
Committee is an outside director within the meaning
of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). The Compensation
Committee has the authority to interpret the AIP, to prescribe,
amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to it and to
make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for
the administration of the AIP. The determinations of the
Compensation Committee pursuant to its authority under the AIP
shall be conclusive and binding.
Amendment and Termination. The Compensation
Committee, subject to the approval of the Board where required,
may alter, amend, suspend or terminate the AIP at any time, but
any amendment to the AIP shall be approved by our stockholders
if approval is necessary for annual bonuses to continue
qualifying as performance-based compensation under Internal
Revenue Code Section 162(m).
Table of Contents
|
| |||||||