|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the HAS 10-Q filed May 7, 2009. Payout %* < 80% 0% Minimum performance 80% 80% 60% For every 1% increase in perf, 2% increase in award 100% 100% For every 1% increase in perf, 3% increase in award 105% 115% 110% 130% For every 1% increase in perf, 4% increase in award 115% 150% 120% 170% 125% 190% This excerpt taken from the HAS 10-Q filed May 2, 2008. Payout %* < 80% 0% Minimum performance 80% 80% 60% For every 1% increase in perf, 2% increase in award 100% 100% For every 1% increase in perf, 3% increase in award 105% 115% 110% 130% For every 1% increase in perf, 4% increase in award 115% 150% 120% 170% 125% 190% This excerpt taken from the HAS 10-Q filed May 3, 2007. Payout %* < 80% 0% Minimum performance 80% 80% 60% For every 1% increase in perf, 2% increase in award 100% 100% For every 1% increase in perf, 3% increase in award 105% 115% 110% 130% For every 1% increase in perf, 4% increase in award 115% 150% 120% 170% 125% 190% This excerpt taken from the HAS 10-Q filed May 5, 2006. Payout %* < 80% 0% Minimum performance 80% 80% 60% For every 1% increase in perf, 2% increase in award 100% 100% For every 1% increase in perf, 3% increase in award 105% 115% 110% 130% For every 1% increase in perf, 4% increase in award 115% 150% 120% 170% 125% 190% This excerpt taken from the HAS 10-Q filed Apr 28, 2005. Payout %* < 80% 0% Minimum performance 80% 80% 60% For every 1% increase in perf, 2% increase in award 100% 100% For every 1% increase in perf, 3% increase in award 105% 115% 110% 130% For every 1% increase in perf, 4% increase in award 115% 150% 120% 170% 125% 190% | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for HAS: |
| |||||||