|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the HAYN 8-K filed Nov 23, 2009. Income Taxes. Income taxes were a benefit of $8.8 million
in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $43.9 million from an expense of $35.1 million in
fiscal 2008, due to a pretax loss. The
effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was a benefit of 14.4% compared to an
expense of 35.9% in fiscal 2008. The
decrease in effective tax rate is primarily attributable to (i) the
impairment of non-deductible goodwill, (ii) a change in the reinvestment
policy of a foreign entity and (iii) change in the state apportionment
factor which lowered the blended state tax rate resulting in an unfavorable
reduction of our deferred tax asset.
These excerpts taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed May 7, 2009. Note 4. Income TaxesIncome tax expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% partly due to state income taxes and differing tax rates on foreign earnings. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2009 was a benefit of 1.5% compared to an expense of 39.2% in the same period of fiscal 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the goodwill impairment charge, a change in the reinvestment policy of a foreign entity and lower U.S. taxable income.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense decreased to a benefit of $3.1 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 from an expense of $9.6 million in the same period of
fiscal 2008 primarily due to a pretax loss.
The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was 6.7%
compared to 39.0% in the same period of fiscal 2008. The decrease in the
effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the impairment of goodwill, a
change in the reinvestment policy of a foreign entity and lower U.S. taxable
income.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense decreased to a benefit of $(0.6) million in the first
six months of fiscal 2009 from an expense of $18.6 million in the same period
of fiscal 2008 due to a pretax loss. The effective tax rate for the first six
months of fiscal 2009 was 1.5% compared to 39.2% in the same period of fiscal
2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the
impairment of goodwill, a change in the reinvestment policy of a foreign entity
and lower U.S. taxable income.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income.
On October 1, 2007 the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 addresses the noncomparability in reporting tax assets and liabilities resulting from a lack of specific guidance in SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, on the uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements. Specifically, FIN 48 prescribes (a) a consistent recognition threshold and (b) a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides related guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
31 These excerpts taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed Feb 9, 2009. Note 4. Income TaxesIncome tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and differing tax rates on foreign earnings. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was 35.4% compared to 39.4% in the same period of fiscal 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to favorable adjustments on an amended state tax return filed in the three months ended December 31, 2008, combined with the prior year impact of FIN 48 during the three months ended December 31, 2007, which did not occur this fiscal year.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense decreased to $2.5 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 from $9.0 million in the same period of
fiscal 2008 primarily due to lower pretax income. The effective tax rate for
the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was 35.4% compared to 39.4% in the same period
of fiscal 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily
attributable to favorable adjustments on an amended state tax return filed in
the three months ended December 31, 2008 combined with the prior year
impact of FIN 48 during the three months ended December 31, 2007 which did
not occur this fiscal year.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
24 This excerpt taken from the HAYN 8-K filed Nov 24, 2008. Income
Taxes. Income tax expense decreased to $35.1 million
in fiscal 2008 from $38.5 million in fiscal 2007 due to lower pretax income.
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2008 was 35.9% compared to 36.8% in fiscal
2007. The decrease in effective tax rate is primarily attributable to (i) lower
blended state tax rate in the U.S. due to an apportionment factor change and (ii) a
higher manufacturers deduction for U.S. based facilities.
These excerpts taken from the HAYN 10-K filed Nov 24, 2008. L. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ("SFAS No. 109"), which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax 67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) (in thousands, except per share data and otherwise noted) Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income. On October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance related to reversal of tax positions, balance sheet classification, interest and penalties, interim period accounting, disclosure and transition. The impact of adoption of FIN 48 on October 1, 2007, was to decrease accumulated earnings by $827, increased goodwill by $675, increase deferred tax asset by $3,316, and increase non-current income taxes payable by $4,818 (including $241 of interest). L. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ("SFAS 67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) (in thousands, except per share data and otherwise noted) Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) planning On This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed Aug 6, 2008. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In addition to the reorganization of the Company, the results of operations have improved due to improved market conditions as evidenced by its increasing backlog. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 addresses the noncomparability in reporting tax assets and liabilities resulting from a lack of specific guidance in SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, on the uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements. Specifically, FIN 48 prescribes (a) a consistent recognition threshold and (b) a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides related guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted FIN 48 on October 1, 2007.
This excerpt taken from the HAYN 8-K filed Dec 13, 2007. Income
Taxes. Income tax expense increased to $38.5
million in fiscal 2007 from $22.3 million in fiscal 2006 due to higher pretax
income. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 was 36.8% compared to 38.6% in
fiscal 2006. The decrease in effective tax rate is primarily attributable to (i) amended
tax returns to claim favorable items from extraterritorial income exclusion and
foreign tax credits and (ii) higher foreign taxable income at a lower tax
rate as compared to taxable income in the U.S. at a higher tax rate.
This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-K filed Dec 12, 2007. L. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ("SFAS No. 109"), which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income. This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed Feb 5, 2007. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or 18 all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In addition to the reorganization of the Company, the results of operations have improved due to improved market conditions as evidenced by its increasing backlog. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income. This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-K filed Dec 8, 2006. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence and the expected reversal date of temporary differences to be deducted on future income tax returns. In its 47 evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax planning strategies and expected reversal dates. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income. This excerpt taken from the HAYN 8-K filed Dec 7, 2006. Income
Taxes. Income taxes
increased to an expense of $22.3 million in fiscal 2006 from a benefit of $2.1
million in fiscal 2005. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 was 38.6%
compared to a tax benefit of 33.8% in fiscal 2005. The increase in effective
tax rate is primarily attributable to more taxable income in the U.S. at a
higher tax rate as compared to foreign taxable income at the lower tax rate.
This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed Aug 14, 2006. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In addition to the reorganization of the Company, the results of operations have improved due to improved market conditions as evidenced by its increasing backlog. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income. This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed May 15, 2006. Income Taxes. Income taxes increased from a benefit of $6.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2005 to an expense of $8.5 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2006 was 39.0% compared to a tax benefit of 35.5% in the same period in fiscal 2005. The increase in effective tax rate is primarily attributable to lower non-deductible expenses (permanent items) in fiscal 2006 than in fiscal 2005, such as fees associated with the filing of our registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These permanent items in the prior year lowered the tax benefit and therefore the effective tax rate.
This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed Feb 14, 2006. Income Taxes. Income taxes increased from a benefit of $5.0
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 to an expense of $2.1 million in
the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The effective tax rate for the first quarter
of fiscal 2006 was 39.0% compared to a tax benefit of 36.9% in the same period
in fiscal 2005. The increase in effective tax rate is primarily attributable to
lower non-deductible expenses (permanent items) in fiscal 2006 than in fiscal
2005, such as fees associated with the filing of our registration statement
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and reorganization items. These
permanent items in the prior year lowered the tax benefit and therefore the
effective tax rate.
This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-K filed Dec 20, 2005. L. Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax impact of temporary differences arising from assets and liabilities whose tax bases are different from financial statement amounts. A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. Realization of the future tax benefits of deferred tax assets is dependent on the Companys ability to generate taxable income within the carryforward period and the periods in which net temporary differences reverse. 54 The Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires the Company to assess all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether a valuation allowance is needed based on the weight of that evidence. This excerpt taken from the HAYN 10-Q filed Aug 24, 2005. Income
Taxes. The income tax
benefit increased by approximately $2.2 million to approximately $3.2 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 from approximately $1.0 million for
the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The effective tax rate increased to 35.1%
for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 from 10.3% for the same period of
fiscal 2004. Upon emergence from bankruptcy, net deferred tax assets were
recorded, because future realization is more likely than not.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:RELATED TOPICS for HAYN: |
| |||||||