HSY » Topics » What material factors or events affected the executive compensation process and decision-making during 2008? What was the response to those factors and events?

This excerpt taken from the HSY DEF 14A filed Mar 16, 2009.

What material factors or events affected the executive compensation process and decision-making during 2008? What was the response to those factors and events?

During 2008 we continued the transformation of our operations and organization that began in 2007. Despite significant volatility in commodities prices, we made progress in implementing our consumer-driven demand model, increased levels of investment in advertising and promoting our brands and strengthened Hershey’s leadership position in the marketplace.

 

   

In November 2007, we announced the resignations of eight members of our Board of Directors and the election of eight new directors, and the appointment of a non-executive Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2008.

 

   

Effective December 1, 2007, Mr. West assumed the position of President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) following the announcement by Richard H. Lenny that he would be retiring from the Company at the end of 2007. During the second half of 2007, we promoted Mr. Alfonso to the position of Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Mr. Bilbrey to Senior Vice President and President, Hershey North America and Ms. Buck to Senior Vice President, Global Chief Marketing Officer. We also announced the retirement or resignation of two executive officers and in 2008 the election of three executive officers who joined Hershey from other companies. In view of the significant changes in our Board and executive team, the Compensation and Executive Organization Committee of our Board, which we refer to in this section as the Committee, approved retention awards for some of our executive officers during 2008.

 

   

In January 2008, we announced our full-year Company-wide results for 2007 which were below the financial targets established at the start of 2007. As a result, no payments based on Company-wide performance results were made to our CEO and other senior executives under our annual incentive program, or AIP, for 2007. Because our three-year financial results were also below target no performance stock unit, or PSU, payments were made to any of our senior executives under our long-term incentive program for the performance cycle that ended in 2007. The year 2007 marked the second year in a row for which Company-wide performance results generated no incentive payment for executive officers under our AIP.

 

   

In January 2008, we also announced our projection that performance in 2008 would reflect net sales growth in a range of 3% to 4% and a 9% reduction from 2007 in annual “diluted EPS from operations” which we define as diluted earnings per share excluding items affecting comparability as described beginning on page 19 of the 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders that accompanies this proxy statement. We announced that our expectation for 2008 diluted EPS from operations would be in a range of $1.85 to $1.90, that we would incur business realignment and impairment charges related to the global supply chain transformation program in the range of $0.37 to $0.42 per share, and that we projected an increase in reported earnings per share-diluted in the range of $1.43 to $1.53. We used these expectations in establishing the performance goals for the 2008 AIP and contingent target PSU awards made in February 2008.

 

38


 

   

During 2008, we increased prices and took other actions in response to rising commodity prices. In addition, we announced a renewed strategic plan and mission that enables a new consumer-centric approach and allocation of resources behind our core brands to combat contracting and changing consumer demand. Throughout the year we continued to gain traction in the marketplace by adding additional retail sales representatives and retail sales merchandisers to better service our retail customers. In January 2009, we announced full-year Company-wide results for 2008 that reflected improved marketplace momentum and were on target with our performance goals for sales, income, free cash flow and EPS. As these results were in line with our anticipated results, annual bonuses under our AIP were earned by our CEO and all other executive officers for the first time since 2005.

 

   

Despite on-target results for 2008, due to the shortfall in results in 2006 and 2007, no PSU payments were made to any of our senior executives under our long-term incentive program for the performance cycle that ended in 2008. In August 2008, we announced that we expect 2009 diluted EPS from operations to be below our long-term growth objective of 6% to 8% as a result of higher input costs and increased consumer investment. It is unlikely that our executive officers will receive any payment of performance stock units for the 2007-2009 PSU performance cycle, although we do anticipate a partial payment for the special two-year 2008-2009 PSU performance cycle.

 

   

During 2008, the Committee engaged Mercer (US) Inc., or Mercer, to serve as compensation consultant to the Committee and to work with management with respect to our executive and Board compensation programs. Mercer succeeded Towers Perrin, an executive compensation consulting firm which had provided such services to the Committee in prior years and did so during the first two months of 2008 when the Committee made decisions and took actions relating to 2008 executive officer compensation levels and awards. Throughout the latter half of 2008, with the assistance of Mercer, the Committee and management reviewed our executive compensation programs, including the design of our AIP and equity award programs in light of market trends, our updated strategic focus and outlook, and the peer groups used for benchmarking compensation and performance. In January and February 2009, at the conclusion of this review, we launched and implemented redesigned performance management and compensation programs to ensure alignment of our executives and all employees with our Company’s strategic goals.

Additional information and analysis regarding these events and actions is provided in the series of questions and answers below.

This excerpt taken from the HSY DEF 14A filed Mar 10, 2008.

What material factors or events affected the executive compensation process and decision-making during 2007? What was the response to those factors and events?

Fiscal year 2007 was a transitional year for us in terms of our operations and our management.

 

   

In January 2007, we announced results for 2006 which did not meet our plan. As a result we did not pay our CEO or any other executive officer a bonus for 2006. We also eliminated salary increases in 2007 for our senior executives, including our CEO, except in connection with promotions or for competitive considerations.

 

   

During the year, we promoted Mr. West first to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, then to President and, effective December 1, 2007, to President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) following the announcement by Mr. Lenny that he would be retiring from the Company at the end of 2007. We increased Mr. West’s compensation in recognition of these promotions.

 

   

We promoted Mr. Alfonso to the position of Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) in July. We increased Mr. Alfonso’s compensation in recognition of his promotion.

 

   

On November 11, 2007, we announced the election of eight new directors to our Board of Directors and that Mr. Wolfe would serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2008 following the retirement of Mr. Lenny. In conjunction with the election of the new directors, six directors elected by the holders of our Common Stock and Class B Common Stock voting together, resigned at the request of the Milton Hershey School Trust and the two elected by holders of our Common Stock resigned as well. Only Mr. Lenny (until December 31, 2007), Mr. West and Mr. Cavanaugh remained as continuing directors, with Mr. Cavanaugh being the sole continuing member of the Compensation and Executive Organization Committee of the Board.

 

   

During November, Ms. Arline announced that she would be retiring at the end of 2007 and, in December, we announced that Mr. Hernquist resigned from the Company and that we elected Mr. Bilbrey to the position of Senior Vice President, President Hershey North America. We entered into agreements with Ms. Arline and Mr. Hernquist to secure transition assistance. We increased the compensation of Mr. Bilbrey in recognition of his promotion.

 

   

In January 2008, we announced our full year results for 2007, which showed a 12.2% decline in annual “diluted EPS from operations,” which we define as diluted earnings per share excluding items affecting comparability as described beginning on page 19 of the 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders that accompanies this proxy statement. We also announced a steeper decline in earnings per share-diluted calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, primarily due to charges associated with the three-year global supply chain transformation program we instituted in early 2007. As these results were below the financial targets we established at the start of 2007, no payments were made to our CEO and our other senior executives under our annual incentive program for 2007 with the exception of Messrs. Alfonso and Bilbrey as discussed on page 46. No performance stock unit payments were made to any of our senior executives under our long-term incentive program for the performance cycle that ended in 2007.

 

40


 

   

In January 2008, we also announced our anticipation that performance in 2008 would reflect net sales growth in a range of 3% to 4%, a 9% reduction from 2007 in diluted EPS from operations to a range of $1.85 to $1.90, business realignment and impairment charges related to the global supply chain transformation program in the range of $0.37 to $0.42 per share, and an increase in earnings per share-diluted to the range of $1.43 to $1.53. We used these expectations in establishing the performance goals for the 2008 annual incentive program and contingent target performance stock unit awards made in February 2008.

Additional information and analysis regarding these events and actions is provided in the series of questions and answers below.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki