|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
IGOI » Topics » If we fail to protect our intellectual property, our business and ability to compete could suffer.This excerpt taken from the IGOI 10-K filed Mar 13, 2009. If we
fail to protect our intellectual property, our business and
ability to compete could suffer.
Our success and ability to compete are dependent upon our
internally developed technology and know-how. We rely primarily
on a combination of patent protection, copyright and trademark
laws, trade secrets, nondisclosure agreements and technical
measures to protect our proprietary rights. While we have
certain patents and patents pending, there can be no assurance
that patents pending or future patent applications will be
issued or that, if issued, those patents will not be challenged,
invalidated or circumvented or that rights granted thereunder
will provide meaningful protection or other commercial advantage
to us. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any patent
rights will be upheld in the future or that we will be able to
preserve any of our other intellectual property rights.
We typically enter into confidentiality, non-compete or
invention assignment agreements with our key employees,
distributors, customers and potential customers, and limit
access to, and distribution of, our product design documentation
and other proprietary information. There can be no assurance
that our confidentiality agreements, confidentiality procedures,
noncompetition agreements or other factors will be adequate to
deter
Table of Contents
misappropriation or independent third-party development of our
technology or to prevent an unauthorized third party from
obtaining or using information that we regard as proprietary. We
have aggressively pursued the protection of our intellectual
property rights, including our recently settled patent
infringement lawsuit against American Power Conversion
Corporation and our ongoing patent infringement lawsuit against
Comarco, Inc. and Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. in the
Eastern District of Texas. Litigation efforts such as these have
been, and will in the future be, necessary to defend our
intellectual property rights, both for our power and expansion
technology, and will likely result in substantial cost to, and
division of efforts by, us.
This excerpt taken from the IGOI 10-K filed Mar 12, 2008. If we
fail to protect our intellectual property, our business and
ability to compete could suffer.
Our success and ability to compete are dependent upon our
internally developed technology and know-how. We rely primarily
on a combination of patent protection, copyright and trademark
laws, trade secrets, nondisclosure agreements and technical
measures to protect our proprietary rights. While we have
certain patents and patents pending, there can be no assurance
that patents pending or future patent applications will be
issued or that, if issued, those patents will not be challenged,
invalidated or circumvented or that rights granted thereunder
will provide meaningful protection or other commercial advantage
to us. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any patent
rights will be upheld in the future or that we will be able to
preserve any of our other intellectual property rights.
We typically enter into confidentiality, noncompete or invention
assignment agreements with our key employees, distributors,
customers and potential customers, and limit access to, and
distribution of, our product
Table of Contents
design documentation and other proprietary information. There
can be no assurance that our confidentiality agreements,
confidentiality procedures, noncompetition agreements or other
factors will be adequate to deter misappropriation or
independent third-party development of our technology or to
prevent an unauthorized third party from obtaining or using
information that we regard as proprietary. We have aggressively
pursued the protection of our intellectual property rights,
including our recently settled patent infringement lawsuit
against American Power Conversion Corporation and our ongoing
patent infringement lawsuit against Comarco, Inc. and Comarco
Wireless Technologies, Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas.
Litigation efforts such as these have been, and will in the
future be, necessary to defend our intellectual property rights,
both for our power and expansion technology, and will likely
result in substantial cost to, and divisions of efforts by, us.
This excerpt taken from the IGOI 10-K filed Mar 16, 2007. If we
fail to protect our intellectual property, our business and
ability to compete could suffer.
Our success and ability to compete are dependent upon our
internally developed technology and know-how. We rely primarily
on a combination of patent protection, copyright and trademark
laws, trade secrets, nondisclosure agreements and technical
measures to protect our proprietary rights. While we have
certain patents and patents
Table of Contents
pending, there can be no assurance that patents pending or
future patent applications will be issued or that, if issued,
those patents will not be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented or that rights granted thereunder will provide
meaningful protection or other commercial advantage to us.
Moreover, there can be no assurance that any patent rights will
be upheld in the future or that we will be able to preserve any
of our other intellectual property rights.
We typically enter into confidentiality, noncompete or invention
assignment agreements with our key employees, distributors,
customers and potential customers, and limit access to, and
distribution of, our product design documentation and other
proprietary information. There can be no assurance that our
confidentiality agreements, confidentiality procedures,
noncompetition agreements or other factors will be adequate to
deter misappropriation or independent third-party development of
our technology or to prevent an unauthorized third party from
obtaining or using information that we regard as proprietary. We
have aggressively pursued the protection of our intellectual
property rights, including our recently settled patent
infringement lawsuit against Formosa Electronics, Co. Ltd. in
the Eastern District of Texas. Litigation efforts such as these
have been, and will in the future be, necessary to defend our
intellectual property rights, both for our power and expansion
technology, and will likely result in substantial cost to, and
divisions of efforts by, us.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||