|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
INFY » Topics » Our earnings will be adversely affected once we change our accounting policies with respect to the expensing of stock options.This excerpt taken from the INFY 6-K filed Jul 28, 2005. Our earnings will be adversely affected once we change our accounting policies with respect to the expensing of stock options. We do not currently deduct the expense of employee stock option grants from our income based on the fair value method. We have adopted the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment requiring companies to change their accounting policies to record the fair value of stock options issued to employees as an expense. The unamortized stock compensation expense as of June 30, 2005 as determined under the fair value method is approximately $12 million. Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-8568, we are required to adopt SFAS 123R from April 1, 2006. The change in the standard will adversely affect our operating results if we make any future grants. However, had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plan been determined in a manner consistent with the existing fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123, our net income as reported would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts of approximately $118 million, $393 million, $223 million and $138 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005, fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003. This excerpt taken from the INFY 20-F filed Apr 26, 2005. Our earnings will be adversely affected once we change our accounting policies with respect to the expensing of stock options.
We do not currently deduct the expense of employee stock option grants from our income based on the fair value method. We have adopted the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment requiring companies to change their accounting policies to record the fair value of stock options issued to employees as an expense. The unamortized stock compensation expense as of March 31, 2005 as determined under the fair value method is approximately $15 million. Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-8568, we are required to adopt SFAS 123R from April 1, 2006. The change in the standard will adversely affect our operating results in the event we make any future grants. However, had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plan been determined in a manner consistent with the existing fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123, our net income as reported would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts of approximately $393 million, $223 million and $138 million in fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003.
Risks Related to Investments in Indian Companies and International Operations Generally
This excerpt taken from the INFY 6-K filed Feb 23, 2005. Our earnings will be adversely affected once we change our accounting policies with respect to the expensing of stock options.
We do not currently deduct the expense of employee stock option grants from our income based on the fair value method. We have adopted the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Recently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment requiring companies to change their accounting policies to record the fair value of stock options issued to employees as an expense. We are required to adopt SFAS 123R from July 1, 2005. The change in our accounting policy with respect to the treatment of employee stock option grants will adversely affect our earnings and we are evaluating the magnitude of that impact. However, had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plan been determined in a manner consistent with the existing fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123, our net income as reported would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts of approximately $270 million, $223 million and $137 million in the nine months ended December 31, 2004, fiscal 2004 and 2003.
Risks Related to Investments in Indian Companies and International Operations Generally
This excerpt taken from the INFY 6-K filed Jan 18, 2005. Our earnings will be adversely affected once we change our accounting policies with respect to the expensing of stock options.
We do not currently deduct the expense of employee stock option grants from our income based on the fair value method. We have adopted the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Recently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment requiring companies to change their accounting policies to record the fair value of stock options issued to employees as an expense. We are required to adopt SFAS 123R from July 1, 2005. The change in our accounting policy with respect to the treatment of employee stock option grants will
54
Table of Contentsadversely affect our earnings and we are evaluating the magnitude of that impact. However, had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plan been determined in a manner consistent with the existing fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123, our net income as reported would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts of approximately $270 million, $223 million and $137 million in the nine months ended December 31, 2004, fiscal 2004 and 2003.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||