|
|
 | | | |
- close
- close
- close
- close
| |||||||||
Interactive Data 10-K 2008 Documents found in this filing:
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K (Mark One)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 OR
For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-31555 Interactive Data Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (781) 687-8500 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate for any other purpose) computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $977,280,933. As of February 12, 2008, the registrant had 94,212,847 shares of common stock outstanding. Documents Incorporated by Reference Certain information required in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2008.
Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of ContentsPART I
OVERVIEW We are a leading global provider of financial market data, analytics and related services to financial institutions, active traders and individual investors. Our customers use our offerings to support their portfolio management and valuation, research and analysis, trading, sales and marketing, and client service activities. We market and sell our services either by direct subscriptions or through third-party business alliances. Our offerings are developed and delivered to customers through four businesses that comprise our two reportable operating segments: Institutional Services and Active Trader Services.
Institutional Services Our Institutional Services segment primarily targets financial institutions such as banks, brokerage firms, mutual fund companies, hedge funds, insurance companies and money management firms. In addition, our Institutional Services segment markets its offerings to financial information providers, information media companies, third-party redistributors and outsourcing organizations. The Institutional Services segment is composed of three businesses, each of which was renamed in February 2007 as part of a global marketing initiative to reinforce our value proposition and emphasize the Interactive Data brand to institutional customers: Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data (formerly FT Interactive Data). Our Pricing and Reference Data business provides financial institutions, third-party redistributors and outsourcing organizations with historical, intraday and end-of-day pricing, evaluations and reference data for an extensive range of securities, commodities, and derivative instruments that are traded around the world. This business accounted for $429.4 million, or 62.3%, of our revenue in 2007. On May 2, 2007, we acquired the net assets comprising the market data division of Xcitek LLC, as well as the market data assets of its affiliate Xcitax LLC (collectively, the “Xcitek Market Data Assets”), for $25.1 million in cash. These assets, which are now managed as part of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, included a broad range of North American corporate actions data, such as reorganization, cost basis, and class action data. We began integrating these assets into our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data business during 2007. We funded this acquisition from existing cash resources. The Xcitek Market Data Assets accounted for $5.3 million, or 1.2% of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data revenue in 2007, and 0.8% of our total revenue in 2007. Interactive Data Real-Time Services (formerly ComStock). Our Real-Time Services business provides financial institutions, financial information providers and information media companies with global real-time and delayed financial market information covering equities, derivative instruments, futures, fixed income securities and foreign exchange. Our Real-Time Services business also offers customized financial information portals and terminals. We acquired this capability as a result of the December 2005 acquisition of IS.Teledata AG, which we subsequently renamed Interactive Data Managed Solutions in 2006. Interactive Data Real-Time Services accounted for $139.4 million, or 20.2%, of our revenue in 2007. Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics (formerly CMS BondEdge). Our Fixed Income Analytics business provides financial institutions with sophisticated fixed income analytics. This business accounted for $32.4 million, or 4.7%, of our revenue in 2007.
1
Table of ContentsActive Trader Services Our Active Trader Services segment targets active traders, individual investors and investment community professionals. We consider investors who typically make their own investment decisions, trade frequently and may earn a substantial portion of their income from trading to be active traders. The Active Trader Services segment is composed of one business: eSignal. Our eSignal business provides active traders, individual investors and investment community professionals with real-time financial market information and access to decision-support tools to assist in their analysis of securities traded on all major markets worldwide. eSignal also operates financial websites that provide investors with free financial information and news about global equities, options, futures and other securities. This business accounted for $88.4 million, or 12.8%, of our revenue in 2007. For revenue, income from operations, identifiable assets and the relevant percentages for each of our segments, in addition to revenue and long-lived assets by geographic region, please refer to Note 13 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking Statements Forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), are made throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. While we may elect to update forward-looking statements in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our estimates change, and investors should not rely on those forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of the filing of this report. A number of important factors could cause our results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including those detailed under the heading, “Risk Factors” in Part I. Corporate History On February 29, 2000, the businesses of Data Broadcasting Corporation (now known as Interactive Data Corporation), which included the eSignal and CMS BondEdge (now known as Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics) businesses, were merged with the historical and end-of-day pricing, evaluations and information business then known as Interactive Data Corporation (now known as Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data), an entity which has been in the financial data business for 40 years and at the time of the merger was 100% indirectly owned by Pearson plc. Principally as a result of this merger, Pearson plc indirectly owns approximately 61% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Interactive Data Corporation (formerly known as Data Broadcasting Corporation) was incorporated in 1992 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Since the merger of Data Broadcasting Corporation and Interactive Data Corporation, we have completed seven acquisitions, which have served to either expand our existing businesses or enabled us to enter adjacent market segments:
2
Table of Contents
Industry Background The financial services industry utilizes a broad range of financial market data and analytics to assist in valuing and transacting securities, to facilitate investment decision making, and to address various regulatory requirements. Such financial market data and analytics include real-time and historic pricing and evaluation information, and reference data such as dividend, corporate actions and key descriptive information about securities, other related business or financial content, as well as access to sophisticated decision-support tools that analyze this content. It is costly and complex for financial institutions, information media companies and others to directly obtain, aggregate, store, evaluate and distribute financial market data from the securities exchanges and other financial markets worldwide. In addition, financial institutions and other organizations using financial market data typically strive to consistently obtain their content in a timely manner without sacrificing quality or security. Further, financial institutions often seek to seamlessly integrate financial content from third parties into analytical tools used for investment research as well as into the systems used in their operational workflow to help address their customer service and support, sales and marketing, regulatory compliance and other business challenges. In addition, active traders, individual investors and investment community professionals seek real-time information and related tools to assist them in formulating, validating and executing their trading strategies. Extensive expertise and technical know-how about the financial market data industry are required to effectively obtain, aggregate, store, evaluate and distribute the volume and diversity of financial content utilized within the financial services industry. This expertise and know-how is highly specialized and diverse, as are the underlying technical infrastructure and related systems for delivering such content and analytics to customers. For these reasons, financial institutions and other organizations work with financial market data vendors like us that specialize in aggregating and delivering financial content directly from many sources around the world, including securities exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange; other financial markets that encompass fixed income, foreign exchange and derivatives including options and futures; and information providers such as news services. Aggregating this data requires establishing relationships with each of these sources to acquire this data and creating a global technical infrastructure capable of collecting the source data and incorporating it into a uniform structure so that it can be delivered in a reliable, consistent and timely manner. In addition, specialized financial market data vendors like us invest significant resources to identify and minimize source or other errors in reporting, collecting, aggregating, storing and distributing information to customers. Further, specialized financial market data vendors like us produce content such as evaluations that can assist financial institutions in their efforts to value their holdings, particularly fixed income securities, that trade infrequently, if at all, in the secondary market. In addition, customers often invest in applications that aggregate content from third-parties together with internal information to support their client service, sales and marketing and operations activities. Moreover, to make timely decisions in support of their investment strategies, many customers access sophisticated analytics like ours, or they utilize financial information portals and terminals that seamlessly integrate financial content from an extensive range of market sources as well as provide access to advanced analytical tools. Services and Customers We offer our services to financial institutions, active traders and individual investors. Our businesses address the financial market data and analytics needs of these customers by providing time-sensitive information regarding a broad spectrum of securities, commodities and derivative instruments as well as access to sophisticated decision-support tools. We target our customers through the businesses within our Institutional Services and Active Trader segments.
3
Table of ContentsInstitutional Services Our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Real-Time Services and Fixed Income Analytics businesses primarily focus on addressing the needs of financial institutions for financial market data, analytics and related services. We have historically achieved high retention rates within our Institutional Services segment. Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data
Our Pricing and Reference Data business provides financial institutions, third-party redistributors and outsourcing organizations with historical, intraday and end-of-day pricing, evaluations and reference data for an extensive range of securities, commodities, and derivative instruments that are traded around the world. We define reference data to encompass a broad range of relevant corporate actions and income-related information, identification and settlement data, and key terms and conditions for a wide range of securities. Examples of reference data include:
As of the end of 2007, this business supplied data directly to over 4,000 institutional customer accounts. A single financial institution may have more than one account. In addition, this business provides services to over 400 redistributors and outsourcing organizations such as custodian banks, service bureaus, prime brokers, financial software and systems companies, and information media firms. These redistributors and outsourcing organizations sublicense or redistribute data typically to medium and small institutions, and individual investors. In addition to information concerning listed securities, Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data provides evaluations for hard-to-value, non-listed fixed income securities through its evaluated pricing services as well as hard-to-obtain information relating to securities from emerging markets. Through our evaluated pricing services, this business provides evaluations for approximately 2.5 million fixed income and equity issues, including securities issued in North America such as corporate, government, municipal and agency fixed income securities, convertible bonds, debentures, pass-through securities and structured finance securities and foreign securities issued in markets outside of North America such as convertible bonds, debentures, Eurobonds, and sovereign and corporate bonds. Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s evaluated pricing services also include our Fair Value Information Service through which we provide evaluations for certain international equity securities. The Fair Value Information Service is designed to provide customers with various information that can be used to estimate a price for an international, exchange-traded issue that would likely prevail in a liquid market in view of information available at the time of evaluation. This business is also addressing the intraday valuation and reference data needs of its customers through the introduction of new services. In September 2007, Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data launched the Basket Calculation ServiceSM, a new web-based offering that calculates intra-day indicative valuations for equity and fixed income exchange traded funds or ETFs. In October 2007, this business introduced a new service designed to deliver comprehensive corporate actions information to clients throughout the day.
4
Table of ContentsInteractive Data Pricing and Reference Data continues to refine and enhance its proprietary methodologies for evaluating infrequently traded fixed income securities by combining sophisticated modeling techniques, information from market sources and teams of skilled evaluators who take account of market conditions and specific price-impacting events. These evaluations represent our good faith opinion of the price a buyer in the marketplace would pay for a given fixed income security (typically in an institutional round lot position) in a current sale. We believe that the combination of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s listed markets pricing information and evaluated pricing services help mutual funds, pension funds and money managers value their holdings. For example, each US mutual fund has a regulatory obligation to determine the fund’s net asset value each trading day. The net asset value is the price per share for all investments in and redemptions from the mutual fund for that day. Many mutual funds consider the pricing and evaluation data from this business as an important part of their own daily valuation determinations. Financial institutions also utilize Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s content to support an array of other applications. For example, reference data provided by this business is used by financial services firms to settle purchases and sales of securities, and prepare reports and account statements internally and for clients. In addition, financial institutions utilize Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s securities information as they perform activities required to meet various regulatory requirements. Historical, end-of-day and intraday data from this business is also used by customers to research investment decisions. Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data has developed proprietary methods for receiving and packaging source data. In addition, when possible, teams of professionals work to enhance the quality and completeness of the data before it is delivered to customers. Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s customers receive a majority of their data through computer-to-computer links and Internet-based applications. This business also works closely with redistributors who typically use their own delivery systems or serve as an interface between their clients’ and Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s delivery systems to redistribute and/or process the data provided by this business. Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data designs its datafeeds to be compatible with third-party software applications and standard industry protocols to allow institutional customers to integrate these datafeeds into their infrastructures. Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data actively seeks to enhance its existing services and develop new offerings by establishing business alliances, automating key data collection and evaluation processes, expanding its data coverage, particularly in the area of hard-to-value securities, increasing the delivery frequency of its services, and adding new capabilities including those designed to assist customers with their operational workflow and regulatory compliance challenges. We believe that the importance of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s services will continue to increase as financial instruments become more numerous and complex, as regulatory requirements expand and as financial services firms continue to automate key processes across their front, middle and back-office operations. Interactive Data Real-Time Services
Our Real-Time Services business provides financial institutions, financial information providers and information media companies with global real-time and delayed financial market information covering equities, derivative instruments, futures, fixed income securities and foreign exchange. Our Real-Time Services business also offers customized financial information portals and terminals. As of the end of 2007, Interactive Data Real-Time Services had approximately 2,300 direct customer accounts. A single financial institution or information media company may have more than one direct account.
5
Table of ContentsThere are two core product areas within Interactive Data Real-Time Services: real-time datafeeds and managed solutions. Within the real-time datafeeds product area, this business markets two real-time datafeed services: PlusFeedSM and DirectPlusSM. PlusFeed is our real-time, low latency global financial market datafeed service that consolidates real-time and/or delayed data from an extensive range of stock exchanges, electronic communications networks or ECNs, and other sources worldwide. PlusFeed has broad coverage of the US securities markets, as well as extensive international coverage in Europe, Asia Pacific, South America and Africa. The real-time data includes coverage of equities (including market depth), commodities and options, mutual funds and money markets, fixed income instruments, foreign exchange rates, and US and international news coverage from a range of sources. In addition to this content, PlusFeed offers comprehensive related information including global fundamental data, corporate actions records, historical data, and analytics capabilities. Interactive Data Real-Time Services offers a variety of delivery methods for PlusFeed, including leased line and Internet delivery via a secure virtual private network. Clients can also access the data via co-location cross connections. In 2007, this business introduced DirectPlus, an ultra-low latency (the time it takes for information to be received from a stock exchange and redistributed to a client) direct exchange data service that is designed to provide customers with access to sub-one millisecond data from major stock exchanges, thereby powering a range of low latency financial applications, including algorithmic trading engines and order management systems. In addition, this business also markets PlusTickSM, a service that provides financial institutions with access to tick and trade data for global securities. PlusTick can be used by clients to assist in their compliance with “best trade execution” and other government mandates, and back-test and help analyze algorithmic trading applications designed to improve investment performance. The second core product area within Interactive Data Real-Time Services is managed solutions, which involves designing and managing customized, web-based financial information portals and terminals. These offerings are hosted on our own technical infrastructure. We entered this product area as a result of our December 2005 acquisition of IS.Teledata AG, which was subsequently renamed Interactive Data Managed Solutions. The offerings from Interactive Data Managed Solutions aggregate content that may be sourced from both the customer and from a number of information providers including Interactive Data’s businesses, and then tailor the visual display of this content to the needs of its clients. Interactive Data Managed Solutions’ offerings consist of financial market data, access to decision-support tools, and hosting services. These offerings utilize a flexible web services architecture designed to meet the needs of financial services users, from consumer portals to the front-office, middle-office and back-office professionals within financial institutions. Such offerings are designed to allow the integration of proprietary and third-party data and to meet the robust performance requirements of the financial services industry. As part of its plans to enhance its services, Interactive Data Real-Time Services seeks to expand its market coverage by adding new stock exchanges, financial markets and news sources. In addition, this business plans to continue enhancing its delivery network to accommodate significant increases in the volume of financial market data, reduce the latency, improve the reliability of its datafeeds, and to add new features and offerings that will help its institutional clients address regulatory requirements and cost-effectively execute their trading strategies. This business also plans to enhance its suite of managed market data solutions by developing new web-based tools for displaying and analyzing investment portfolios, adding new capabilities to identify a broader range of derivative instruments, options, futures and investment funds, and by creating new statistical tools designed to enable customers to better track the performance of their investments. Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics
Our Fixed Income Analytics business provides financial institutions with fixed income data and sophisticated fixed income analytics. Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics markets BondEdge®, a service used by financial institutions to manage risks and understand the performance of diversified fixed income portfolios. This business also markets Analytix DirectSM, a fixed
6
Table of Contentsincome datafeed service that provides a variety of risk measures independent of a dedicated software application. As of the end of 2007, more than 500 direct institutional accounts based primarily in North America subscribed to BondEdge and other services from Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics. A single financial institution may have multiple accounts supporting different applications in various departments. The primary users of our services within these financial institutions are fixed income portfolio managers who invest in or sell fixed income securities, particularly those that require specialized modeling. BondEdge enables clients to simulate various market environments to help forecast performance results, validate investment strategies against a variety of benchmark indices, and respond to reporting demands. BondEdge includes interest rate and credit risk management tools, access to an extensive global fixed income securities database as well as regulatory reporting and compliance tools. BondEdge interfaces with many of the major third-party accounting and asset/liability software packages in order to reduce duplicate data entry and to facilitate improved accuracy and efficiency within an organization. Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics customers are provided access to daily financial market data updates via the Internet to assist in the creation of high-quality analytic calculations and reports. BondEdge is offered via an array of delivery options, including client-server (BondEdge), ASP/Internet accessible (eBondEdge) and local area network/wide area network configurations (BondEdge ES). In addition, this business provides a service bureau offering, which is an outsourcing option whereby Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics professionals run BondEdge on behalf of the customers and provide customers with certain fixed income portfolio analysis and risk management information. In addition, to meet the needs of large financial institutions who operate centralized data warehouses to support multiple departments and various applications throughout the institution, this business offers analytical risk measures via its Analytix Direct datafeed service. Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics continues to invest in product and business development activities designed to expand business with existing and prospective customers in North America, Europe and Australia. In particular, this business is seeking to accelerate adoption of its Analytix Direct datafeed service through cross-selling initiatives with our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data business. In addition, this business plans to introduce its next-generation BondEdge service in 2008 and is expanding the potential market for BondEdge by targeting new liability-driven investing applications within current and prospective pension fund customers. Active Trader Services Our eSignal business services the needs of active traders, individual investors and investment community professionals. eSignal
Our eSignal business provides real-time financial market information and access to decision-support tools that assist active traders, individual investors and investment community professionals in their analysis of securities traded on major markets worldwide. eSignal also operates financial websites that provide investors with free financial information and news about global equities, options, futures and other securities. These financial websites generate revenue through online advertising. The financial data available to eSignal subscribers includes equities, options, derivative instrument data, single stock futures, indices, market depth from various exchanges including from the NASDAQ Stock Market, the New York Stock Exchange, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade, as well as ECN and foreign exchange market information, fixed income data, mutual fund data and money market data. In addition, eSignal subscribers receive access to decision-support tools including historical databases, technical charting, customizable analytics, back testing, portfolio tracking and news and commentary. As of the end of 2007, this business had 63,539 direct subscription terminals.
7
Table of ContentseSignal’s information is delivered via a sophisticated network infrastructure with an advanced Internet protocol multicast backbone and multiple, geographically dispersed computer server farms. eSignal services include its financial websites: Quote.com®, RagingBull.com and FutureSource.com; subscription services aimed at active traders: its eSignal-branded workstation and related offerings such as eSignal®, eSignal Market Scanners, and eSignal, Advanced GET® edition; LiveCharts® and QCharts® market data platforms; and QuoTrek® for wireless access to real-time streaming market data; trading education services aimed at active traders through its seminar offering, eSignal Learning; and real-time market data platforms designed for investment community professionals: eSignal Pro®, the FutureSource® line of workstations and the web-based Market-QSM desktop solution. This business seeks to expand its portfolio of services and enhance its existing offerings by broadening the content offered across its services and websites, and adding new features and capabilities. Business Strategy We are focused on expanding our position as a leading provider of financial market data, analytics and related services to financial institutions, active traders and individual investors. A key element of our strategy involves working closely with our largest customers and redistributors to better understand and address their current and future financial market data needs. By better understanding customer needs, we believe we can develop enhancements to existing services and introduce new offerings which offer new or improved features, content or capabilities that appeal to current and prospective customers. As part of our efforts to build strong customer relationships, we continue to invest significant resources to provide high-quality, responsive customer support and service. We believe that our combination of strong account management and responsive customer support has contributed to our historically high customer retention rates within our Institutional Services segment, as well as enhanced our ability to attract new customers. In 2007, we aligned our Pricing and Reference Data, and Real-Time Services business under a single management structure from a business and product strategy, sales management and operational perspective. We believe this action will enable us to build upon the progress made during the past several years in presenting our business more effectively to the marketplace and to move faster in addressing client needs spanning four core product areas: evaluations, reference data, real-time datafeed services and managed solutions. We plan to continue investing in organic growth initiatives and pursuing strategic acquisitions that will enable us to expand our business in one or more of the following areas:
8
Table of Contents
In addition, optimizing our technical infrastructure represents another key element in our strategy. Our technology infrastructure and operations support both the Institutional Services and Active Trader Services segments of our business and are designed to facilitate the reliable and efficient processing and delivery of data to our customers. We have implemented, and will continue to implement, initiatives aimed at optimizing our technical infrastructure by taking advantage of existing resources residing across our global organization. For example, in early 2008, we launched a new real-time processing facility in London to further accelerate delivery of real-time data to customers in Europe. By continuing to optimize our technical infrastructure, we believe we can enhance our ability to meet the data delivery needs of our customers while improving our operational efficiency. Our business has historically generated a high level of recurring revenue and cash flow from operations. We typically invest our financial resources in organic growth initiatives and strategic acquisitions while maintaining a conservative capital structure. We also have returned cash to stockholders through stock buyback programs and dividends at levels and junctures as our Board of Directors believes appropriate. Marketing To support the sales efforts of our businesses, we implement a range of promotional activities such as public relations, direct mail, email, seminars, targeted trade shows and customer-oriented events, and advertising. When possible, our businesses coordinate sales, marketing and development activities to cost-effectively address the needs of mutual customers in a timely manner. We also work closely with redistributors to jointly market our services to current and prospective customers. Across each of our businesses, regardless of business segment, contractual arrangements for the provision of data services to customers take one of three forms: (1) a fixed annual, semi-annual, quarterly or monthly subscription; (2) variable fees based upon usage; and (3) a combination of a fixed fee and usage, where a fixed subscription is accompanied by additional amounts which are charged for usage above agreed upon levels. Specific marketing strategies within our Institutional Services and Active Trader Services segments include: Institutional Services As discussed above, in February 2007, we implemented a global marketing initiative to reinforce our value proposition and emphasize the Interactive Data brand to institutional clients. These activities included renaming our three institutional businesses. In September 2007, we unified the previously separate sales, client relationship management and client service organizations for our Pricing and Reference Data, and Real-Time Services businesses. Related to this initiative, we began the process of our sales incentive and commission programs, focused on product cross-training and advanced efforts to deploy a unified customer relationship management application for both client support and sales personnel. In addition, we expanded the scope of our major accounts group, which is composed of senior relationship and customer support staff, to address the enterprise-wide needs of strategic customers. Our institutionally oriented sales teams possess specialized industry and product expertise. They provide on-site and remote demonstrations of our services and interact directly with our customers and prospects. In 2008, we intend to continue to work closely with our institutional customers to identify new sales opportunities, and better leverage and coordinate selling efforts across our organization. Active Trader Services Each of the core Active Trader Services offerings, including online advertising on our financial websites, is marketed by sales and product support specialists within eSignal. These offerings are supported by eSignal through the conventional promotional campaigns discussed above as well as through third-party developer relationships which market eSignal’s Internet-delivered services to their customers. eSignal also invites third-party software developers to write trading system software that is compatible with eSignal’s systems and asks trading educators to consider use of eSignal services in their seminars. In addition to direct sales, distribution channel partners have been an important source of new subscribers in recent years.
9
Table of ContentsCompetition The market for providing financial market data, analytics and related services is highly competitive in each of our business segments. Across our businesses, we believe that our primary competitive advantages include the following:
Institutional Services Competition within our Institutional Services segment ranges from large, established suppliers of news and financial data to smaller, more specialized vendors. The main competitors with respect to our institutionally oriented Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, and Interactive Data Real-Time Services businesses are large global suppliers of financial and business news and financial market data, including Bloomberg, Reuters Group plc, Standard and Poor’s (a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies), Telekurs Financial (part of Swiss Financial Market Services), Thomson Financial (an operating unit of The Thomson Corporation) and similar data producers and smaller data vendors that compete against us in specific geographic regions and niche markets. Some of our established competitors have greater financial, technical, sales, marketing, and support resources, and are able to devote more significant resources to the research and development of new services than we can. In addition, these competitors may have diverse service-line offerings which allow them the flexibility to price their services more aggressively. Some of our competitors also have more extensive customer bases and broader customer relationships than we do, including relationships with prospective customers in their local geographies. Another challenge includes customers self-sourcing financial data and news directly from brokers, exchanges and news services. As a specialty service, Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics competes against other financial services analytical software companies such as FactSet Research Systems Inc. (as a result of its 2005 acquisition of Derivative Solutions Inc.), The Yield Book, Inc., (a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Capital Markets), and Wilshire Associates Incorporated. Other challenges unique to this business include brokerage firms developing software solutions internally or with the assistance of outside consultants. We believe that additional competitive advantages possessed by Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics include unbiased analytics (independent of a brokerage or asset management firm), advanced modeling analytics to evaluate fixed income securities individually or in a portfolio context, a datafeed service to support data warehouse applications, and flexible reporting capabilities. Active Trader Services Within the Active Trader Services segment of our business, eSignal competes against numerous competitors including CQG, Inc., DTN Market Access, Inc., Thomson Financial, TradeStation, Lehman Brothers via its 2006 acquisition of Townsend Analytics, and others. eSignal’s financial websites compete directly and indirectly for advertisers, viewers and content providers against numerous competitors that aggregate financial, business and investment information, news and related content including general purpose consumer-oriented websites such as Google™, Yahoo!®, America Online®, and MSN Money; financial and business-oriented news services, newspapers, magazines, and television networks that operate related websites such as Reuters, Bloomberg Business News, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes and CNN; and specialized business, financial and investment websites such as TheStreet.com®, StockCharts.com™, MarketWatch.com® and Fool.com®. In addition to the advantages cited above, we also believe that our other competitive advantages with respect to our Active Trader services include ease of use, compatibility with third-party software packages, and price. Technology Infrastructure Our global technology infrastructure and operations support both the Institutional Services and Active Trader Services segments of our business and are designed to facilitate the reliable and efficient processing and delivery of data and analytics to our customers. Our systems contain multiple layers of redundancy to enhance system performance, including maintaining, processing and storing data at multiple data centers. In our Real-Time Services and eSignal businesses, user connections are load balanced between our data centers and, in the event of a site failure, equipment problem or regional disaster, the remaining centers have the capacity to handle the additional load.
10
Table of ContentsWe continue to be focused on maintaining a global technical infrastructure that allows us to support our growing businesses, and provide data and analytics using various delivery methods designed to best meet the needs of our customers worldwide. Intellectual Property We maintain a portfolio of intellectual property, including registered and common law trademarks and service marks and copyrights. Additionally, we have one patent and two patents pending. Our patent expires in December 2022. We have rights to approximately 50 trademarks and service marks. We place significant emphasis on our branding and consider our trademark and service mark portfolio to be an important part of our ongoing branding initiative. In addition, we own the copyrights to our internally developed software applications and data delivery services. No single trademark, service mark, copyright, or patent, if lost, would materially adversely affect our operations or financial results as a whole. License agreements, both as licensor with our customers and as licensee with suppliers of data, are important to our business. The termination of any license with a major data supplier, such as the New York Stock Exchange or other similar financial markets, would materially disrupt our operations. We have rights to use the “FT” brand in conjunction with our institutional activities on a global basis under a license with The Financial Times Limited, an affiliate of Pearson plc, or Pearson. This license, which was renewed for a one-year term on March 7, 2007, automatically renews for subsequent one-year terms unless terminated. Although the license has not yet been terminated, we no longer actively use the “FT” brand as part of our institutional sales and marketing activities. We do not believe the cessation of our rights under this license would materially adversely affect our operations or financial results as a whole. Geographic Areas Through subsidiaries and affiliates, we conduct business in numerous countries outside the United States. Our international businesses are subject to risks customarily encountered in foreign operations, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, import and export controls, and other laws, policies and regulations of foreign governments. During the past three fiscal years, our revenue by geographic region was as follows:
11
Table of ContentsFor the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
Employees We had approximately 2,304 employees as of January 31, 2008. We believe that our relations with our employees are good. Regulation Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, is registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Our Interactive Data (Australia) Pty Ltd subsidiary is licensed by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, or ASIC, to provide certain financial services in Australia under the Corporations Act 2001. We have filed an application with the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority to register certain future planned activities of our U.K. eSignal business. Internet Address, SEC Reports and NYSE Reports We maintain a website with the address www.interactivedata.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. Our SEC filings are also available over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy this information at the SEC’s public reference facilities in Washington D.C. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about these facilities. We also include on our website our code of business conduct and ethics, corporate governance guidelines and the charters for each of the audit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance, and independent committees of our Board of Directors. In addition, we intend to disclose on our website any amendments to, or waivers from, our code of business conduct and ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. We submitted our 2007 annual Section 12(a) CEO Certification to the New York Stock Exchange. The Certification was not qualified in any respect. Executive Officers of the Registrant
Stuart J. Clark has served as our president and chief executive officer and a member of our Board of Directors since February 29, 2000, and has been employed in the financial information industry since 1968. Prior to his current position with
12
Table of Contentsus, he served as president of Interactive Data Corporation (as it existed prior to its merger with Data Broadcasting Corporation) since 1995. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Clark was a director of UK-based Financial Times Information, with specific responsibility for the Market Data Division. Prior to 1993, Mr. Clark led the Market Data Division of Extel Financial Limited, which was acquired by Pearson plc’s Financial Times Group in December 1993. Andrew J. Hajducky III joined Interactive Data as executive vice president, treasurer and chief financial officer in June 2006. In this role, Mr. Hajducky is responsible for overseeing Interactive Data’s financial operations, human resources, corporate information systems, corporate planning, purchasing, and investor relations. Prior to joining Interactive Data, Mr. Hajducky was executive vice president, chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary for DirectoryM Inc., an online directory technology company and before that, he was executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer at Centre Path Network, Inc. (formerly Giant Loop Network, Inc.) . From 1995 through 2001, Mr. Hajducky served as executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer of CMGI, Inc. (NASDAQ: CMGI). Prior to CMGI, Mr. Hajducky was a partner at Ernst & Young LLP, where he established and grew the firm’s mergers and acquisitions practice in New England. His work experience also includes serving as chief financial officer of Mountain International Company/Accu-Tel, Inc. after starting his career as an auditor at Price Waterhouse LLP and Coopers & Lybrand LLP. Andrea H. Loew has served as our general counsel and corporate secretary since February 29, 2000. In February 2007 she was appointed executive vice president. From September 1996 until February 29, 2000, Ms. Loew served as vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary of Interactive Data Corporation (as it existed prior to its merger with Data Broadcasting Corporation). Prior thereto, Ms. Loew was a partner in Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, LLC and before that an associate at Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP. John L. King has served as our chief operating officer since September 2005 and as chief operating officer of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data since April 1999. From 1997 to April 1999, Mr. King served as the managing director/president of Financial Times Group’s Extel Financial Ltd. business. Prior thereto, Mr. King served as vice president, IDSI services for Interactive Data Corporation (as it existed prior to its merger with Data Broadcasting Corporation). Raymond L. D’Arcy has served as our president of sales and marketing since September 2005. He had served as president of data delivery products for Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data from January 2001 until September 2005. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. D’Arcy served as senior vice president of global sales, marketing and customer support for Interactive Data Corporation (as it existed prior to its merger with Data Broadcasting Corporation) and from 1996 to 1999 as Vice President of North American Sales, Marketing and Customer Support. Prior thereto, Mr. D’Arcy served as Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s regional sales director for Eastern North America for ten years. Mark Hepsworth has served as President, Institutional Business since September 2007. In this role, he is responsible for leading the business strategy, product development and general business management across Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data and Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Prior to this role, Mr. Hepsworth had served as president of Interactive Data Real-Time Services since October 2005. His experience includes a decade as Managing Director for Interactive Data Real-Time Services (formerly known as ComStock) in Europe. Mr. Hepsworth joined ComStock in Europe as General Manager in 1995.
Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our investors. This section contains forward-looking statements. You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements appearing just before our Corporate History above. We face intense competition. We operate in highly competitive markets in which we compete with other distributors of financial market data, analytics and related services. We expect competition to continue to be intense. Some of our competitors and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. These competitors may be able to expand offerings and data content more effectively, use their financial resources to sustain aggressive pricing and to respond more rapidly than us to new or emerging technologies, changes in the industry or changes in customer needs. They may also be in a position to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their services. Increased competition in the future could adversely affect our market share or margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. The continuing impact of cost-cutting pressures across the financial services industry could reduce demand for our services. Many customers within the financial services industry strive to reduce their operating costs. To achieve this goal, customers may seek to reduce their spending on financial market data services and related analytics. If customers elect
13
Table of Contentsto reduce their spending with us, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Alternatively, customers may use other strategies to reduce their overall spending on financial market data services, by consolidating their spending with fewer vendors, by selecting vendors with lower-cost offerings or by self-sourcing their need for financial market data. If customers elect to consolidate their spending on financial market data services with other vendors and not us, if we cannot price our services as aggressively as the competition, or if customers elect to self-source their needs, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected. A decline in activity levels in the securities markets could lower demand for our services. Our business is dependent upon the health of the financial markets as well as the financial health of the participants in those markets. Some of the financial market data demand is dependent upon activity levels in the securities markets while other demand is static and is not dependent on activity levels. In the event that the US or international financial markets suffer a prolonged downturn that results in a significant decline in investor activity or adversely impacts the financial condition of our customers, our revenue could be materially adversely affected. A prolonged outage at one of our data centers could result in reduced revenue and the loss of customers. Our customers rely on us for the delivery of time-sensitive, up-to-date data and analytics. Our business is dependent on our ability to rapidly and efficiently process substantial volumes of data and calculations on our computer-based networks and systems. Our computer operations and those of our suppliers and customers are vulnerable to interruption by fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist attacks, acts of war, Internet failures, computer viruses and other events beyond our reasonable control. The occurrence of any of these events could disrupt our operations. An interruption in the delivery of our services may induce our customers to seek alternative data suppliers. Any such losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. Although we seek to minimize these risks through security measures, controls and back-up data centers, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful or effective. If we are unable to maintain relationships with key suppliers and providers of market data, we would not be able to provide our services to our customers. We depend on key suppliers for the data we provide to our customers. Some of this data is exclusive to particular suppliers, such as national stock exchanges, and cannot be obtained from other suppliers. In other cases, although the data may be available from secondary sources, the secondary source may not be as adequate or reliable as the primary or preferred source, or we may not be able to obtain replacement data from an alternative supplier without undue cost and expense, if at all. We obtain much of the data we distribute thorough license agreements with data suppliers. The disruption of any license agreement with a major data supplier, such as the New York Stock Exchange, could disrupt our operations and lead to an adverse impact on our results of operations. Our inability to maintain relationships with service bureaus and custodian banks would decrease our revenue. Part of our strategy is to serve as a major data supplier to service bureaus and custodian banks and thereby to benefit from the trend of major financial institutions in North America outsourcing their back office operations to such entities. While we believe the importance of back office operations will continue to increase, if this trend shifts or any of these relationships are disrupted or terminated, our results of operations could be materially adversely impacted. Consolidation of financial services within and across industries could lower demand for our services. As consolidation occurs and synergies are achieved, the number of potential customers for our services decreases. There are two types of consolidations: consolidations within an industry, such as banking; and across industries, such as consolidations of insurance, banking and brokerage companies. When two companies that separately subscribe to or use our services combine, they may terminate or reduce duplicative subscriptions for our services, or if they are billed on a usage basis, usage may decline due to synergies created by the business combination. We experienced cancellations in prior years as a result of this trend and these consolidations and cancellations may continue. A large number of cancellations, or lower utilization on an absolute dollar basis resulting from consolidations, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue. New offerings by competitors or new technologies could cause our services to become less competitive or obsolete or we may not be able to develop new and enhanced service offerings. We operate in an industry that is characterized by rapid and significant technological change, frequent new service introductions, data content and coverage enhancements, and evolving industry standards. Without the timely introduction of new services, or the expansion or enhancement of our data content and coverage, our services could become technologically obsolete or inadequate over time, in which case our revenue and operating results would suffer. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current services, to enhance data content and coverage and to introduce new services and technologies. These competitors may adapt more quickly to new technologies, changes in the industry and changes in customers’ requirements than we can. If we fail to adequately and accurately anticipate customers’ needs and technological trends, we will be unable to introduce new services into the market and our ability to compete would be materially adversely impacted. Further, if we are
14
Table of Contentsunsuccessful at developing and introducing new services that are appealing to customers, with acceptable prices and terms, or if any such new services are not made available in a timely manner, our ability to compete would be likewise be materially adversely impacted. In both cases such occurrences could adversely impact our ability to maintain or grow revenue and our operating results could be materially adversely affected. Finally, in order to effectively expand into new geographic areas, which is a key element of our growth strategy, we need to develop geographic specific services, or enhance or add to current services so that they meet the needs of users in specific geographic locations. Finally, any new services or data content that we may develop and/or introduce may not achieve market acceptance; lack of market acceptance could result in lower revenue levels and/or impair our ability to grow revenue. Our continued growth depends, in part, on our ability to successfully identify and complete acquisitions and enter into strategic business alliances. Our business strategy includes growth through acquisition of assets and businesses that complement or augment our existing services and through the creation of strategic business alliances. We intend to continue to address the need to develop new services, enhance existing services and expand into complementary service areas through acquisitions of other companies, service offerings, technologies, and personnel, however, acquisitions may not be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. Promising acquisitions are difficult to identify and complete for a number of reasons, including competition among prospective buyers and, in some instances, the need for regulatory, including antitrust, approvals. We may not be able to identify and successfully complete acquisition or strategic business alliance transactions. Any acquisition we may complete may be made at a substantial premium over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired company. We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits from any strategic acquisitions or alliances that we enter into. Strategic alliances have also been and continue to be important to expanding our customer base and enhancing the appeal of our offerings. We have established strategic business alliances with companies who redistribute our services to their customers or who provide us with additional content that we can redistribute to our customers. The success of any acquisition depends in part on our ability to integrate the acquired business or assets, including customers, employees, operating systems, operating procedures and information technology systems. We may not be able to effectively integrate and manage the operations of any acquired business. In addition, the process of integrating acquired businesses or assets may involve unforeseen difficulties and integration could take longer than anticipated. Integrating any newly acquired businesses may require a disproportionate amount of management’s attention and financial and other resources, and detract from the resources remaining for our pre-existing business. Further, we may not be able to maintain or improve the historical financial performance of acquired businesses. Finally, we may not fully derive all of the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions, such as supply cost synergies or reduced operating costs due to centralized or shared technical infrastructure. The success of our strategic alliances depends in part on our ability to work collaboratively with these business partners to jointly market our services and content. We may not be able to effectively or efficiently deliver our services to these business partners or redistribute their content under financial terms that are mutually satisfactory, or achieve the desired benefits from these alliances. We are subject to regulatory oversight and we provide services to financial institutions that are subject to significant regulatory oversight, and any investigation of us or our customers relating to our services could be expensive, time consuming and harm our reputation. The securities laws and other regulations that govern certain of our activities and the activities of our customers are complex. Compliance with these regulations may be reviewed by federal agencies, including the SEC, state authorities and other governmental entities both in the US and foreign countries. To the extent any of our customers become the subject of a regulatory investigation or a civil lawsuit relating to actual or alleged violations of one or more of their regulatory obligations, we could also become subject to intense scrutiny. This intense scrutiny could involve an examination by regulators of whether the services we provided to the customer during the time period of the alleged violation were related to or contributed to the commission of the alleged or actual violation or result in a claim or civil lawsuit filed against us by the customer or the customer’s clients seeking damages. Any investigation by a regulatory agency of one of our customers or us, whether or not founded, or a claim or civil lawsuit filed against us could cause us to incur substantial costs and would distract our management from our business. In addition, the negative publicity associated with any public investigation could adversely affect our ability to attract and/or retain customers. New legislation or changes in governmental or quasi-governmental rules, regulations, directives, or standards may reduce demand for our services or increase our expenses. Our customers must comply with governmental and qausi-governmental rules, regulations, directives and standards. We develop, configure and market services to assist customers in meeting these requirements. New legislation, or a significant change in rules, regulations, directives, or standards, could cause our services to become obsolete, reduce demand for our services or increase our expenses in order to continue providing services to clients. Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to complex regulations and licensing requirements. Our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data subsidiary is a registered investment adviser with the SEC and is subject to significant regulatory obligations under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The securities laws and other regulations that govern Interactive Data
15
Table of ContentsPricing and Reference Data’s activities as a registered investment adviser are complex. If we were to ever lose our investment adviser status, we might no longer be able to operate those portions of our business for which we have qualified as an investment adviser. Similarly, our Interactive Data (Australia) Pty Ltd subsidiary is licensed by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, or ASIC, to provide certain financial services in Australia under the Corporations Act 2001. The financial services laws and other regulations that govern its activities are complex. If we were to lose this license, the subsidiary might no longer be able to operate those portions of our business in Australia that require the license to be held. In addition, in order to offer new financial services we could be required to extend the license authorizations, which is at the discretion of ASIC. The inability to provide one or more of our services would adversely impact our revenue and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally. During 2007, approximately 29.1% of our revenue was generated outside the United States. Because we sell our services outside the United States, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. Accordingly, our business and financial results could be adversely affected due to a variety of factors, including:
We may not be able to attract and retain key personnel. We depend on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel to operate and expand our business and we may not be able to retain the services of our key personnel. Our ability to replace any key personnel who resigns may be difficult and may take an extended period of time because of the limited number of senior individuals in the financial information industry with the breadth of skills and experience required to operate and successfully expand a business such as ours or perform some of the key business functions we require. Competition to hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may not be able to hire or retain these personnel. Pearson has the ability to control us. Pearson indirectly holds approximately 61% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Accordingly, Pearson has the ability to exert significant influence over our management and our affairs, including the ability to elect all of the directors and to approve or disapprove any corporate actions submitted to a vote of our stockholders.
None.
16
Table of Contents
We own no real estate but lease the following principal facilities for use as corporate headquarters, sales offices and data centers:
With the exception of our Hong Kong office, we have excluded leased properties less than 1,500 square feet. We believe our facilities are in good condition, and are suitable and adequate for our current and currently planned operations. If we are unable to renew any of the leases that are due to expire in 2008, we believe that suitable replacement properties are available on commercially reasonable terms.
We are involved in ordinary, routine litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business with a portion of the defense and/or settlement costs in some cases being covered by various commercial liability insurance policies and third party indemnifications.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.
17
Table of ContentsPART II
Market Information Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “IDC”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the intraday high and low sale prices per share of our common stock during each of the quarters set forth below as reported on the New York Stock Exchange:
18
Table of ContentsPerformance Graph(1),(2) The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to stockholders on the Company’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite index and the Dow Jones US Financial Services index. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock and in each of the indexes on 12/31/2002 and its relative performance is tracked through 12/31/2007.
Fiscal year ending December 31.
Stockholders As of February 12, 2008, there were 94,212,847 outstanding shares of our common stock held by 1,063 stockholders of record.
19
Table of ContentsDividends In fiscal year 2006, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
In fiscal year 2007, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
All of the above cash dividends have been paid or will be paid from our existing cash resources. The actual declaration of future dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates, is subject to final determination by our Board of Directors. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities In October 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of our outstanding shares of common stock. On December 11, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized an additional 2,000,000 shares under the stock buyback program. Repurchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, subject to market conditions and other factors and in compliance with applicable legal requirements. We use cash on hand to fund repurchases under the stock buyback program. We are not obligated to acquire any particular amount of common stock as a result of the stock buyback program, which may be suspended at any time at our discretion. As of December 31, 2007, there remained 2,770,900 shares available for purchase under the stock buyback program. In 2007, we purchased an aggregate of 1,177,100 shares of common stock at an average price of $27.03. In 2006, we purchased an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $20.74 per share. In 2005, we purchased an aggregate of 1,407,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $21.52 per share.
20
Table of Contents
The following selected historical consolidated financial information for the years ended December 31, 2003 through 2007 has been derived from our consolidated financial statements. For additional information see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information set forth below is qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
21
Table of Contents
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 6 “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements included herein in Item 8. Amounts in the tables, including footnotes to the tables, are shown in thousands, except per share data. Overview We are a leading global provider of financial market data, analytics and related services to financial institutions, active traders and individual investors. Our customers use our offerings to support their portfolio management and valuation, research and analysis, trading, sales and marketing, and client service activities. We market and license our services either by direct subscriptions or through third-party business alliances. Our offerings are developed and delivered to customers through four businesses that comprise our two reportable operating segments: Institutional Services and Active Trader Services. Institutional Services In the Institutional Services segment, we have the following three businesses, each of which was renamed in February 2007 as part of a global marketing initiative to reinforce our value proposition and emphasize the Interactive Data brand to institutional clients:
On May 1, 2007, we acquired the net assets comprising the market data division of Xcitek LLC, as well as the market data assets of its affiliate Xcitax LLC, for $25.1 million in cash. These assets, which are now managed as part of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, included a broad range of North American corporate actions data, such as reorganization, cost basis and class action data. We are integrating these assets into our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data business. We funded this acquisition from existing cash resources. On December 13, 2005, we acquired approximately 95.1% of Frankfurt-based IS.Teledata AG and its subsidiaries, or IS.Teledata, for $54,628,000, offset by cash acquired of $5,212,000. We subsequently renamed this business Interactive Data Managed Solutions and it is managed as part of the Interactive Data Real-Time Services business. Financial institutions utilize offerings from Interactive Data Managed Solutions to build and operate customized web-based financial information portals and terminals. This acquisition enables us to market a suite of offerings that complement our core portfolio of financial market data services, and broaden our presence in continental Europe. During 2006, we subsequently acquired the remaining 4.9% of this business from minority stockholders for an aggregate purchase price of $2,914,000, which increased the net price paid for IS.Teledata to $52,330,000. We funded this acquisition from existing cash resources. Active Trader Services In the Active Trader Services segment, we have one business, eSignal, which was supplemented by the March 2006 acquisition of the net assets of Quote.com and certain other related assets:
On March 6, 2006, we acquired the net assets of Quote.com and certain other related assets from Lycos, Inc. These assets are managed as part of the eSignal business and include subscription-based active trader services, QCharts and LiveCharts, and the financial websites, Quote.com and RagingBull.com. The price paid in cash for the assets was $30,000,000. We are now in the process of integrating these assets into our eSignal business. We funded this acquisition from existing cash resources.
22
Table of ContentsDevelopment of Business Our results of operations for 2007 include the activities of our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data (including nearly 8 months of Xcitek), Interactive Data Real-Time Services, Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics, and eSignal (including Quote.com) businesses. Our results of operations for 2006 include the activities of our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Interactive Data Real-Time Services, Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics, and eSignal (including nearly 10 months of Quote.com) businesses. Our results of operations for 2005 include the activities of our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Interactive Data Real-Time Services (including 19 days of Interactive Data Managed Solutions), Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics, and eSignal businesses. Business and Market Trends In 2007, we experienced market conditions that were largely consistent with those we experienced during the past several years. Throughout this period, modest increases in spending by institutional customers for financial market data services were partially offset by the continuing impact of our customers’ ongoing cost containment initiatives. We believe that spending by financial institutions on market data and related services in 2008 will be influenced by a focus on cost containment initiatives as customers spend prudently on such services. It is unclear at this time what impact the recent conditions of the financial markets will have on the operational spending of financial institutions in 2008. Current conditions may lead to an increased focus on containing or reducing market data spending, which could impact our revenues. Institutional Services Within the Institutional Services segment, overall annual renewal rates for customer contracts remained at approximately 95% in 2007, consistent with our experience over the past three years. We believe that much of the data we supply is mission critical to our customers’ operations regardless of market conditions; however, we are affected, at least in part, by the continuing cost containment focus within our institutional customer base. If the data we provide were not mission critical, we believe a decline in market conditions would affect us more adversely. The following are among the major trends influencing our institutional businesses:
23
Table of ContentsInteractive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s growth continues to be driven by new sales to existing customers, and, to a lesser extent, new sales to new customers. Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data’s growth in 2007 was primarily driven by increased demand for its broad range of services, coupled with strong retention rates and higher usage revenue. Growth in the Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data business is dependent, in large part, on our ability to continue the expansion of our data content offerings in order to meet the current and evolving needs of our customers, particularly as regulatory changes occur and as financial instruments become more numerous and complex. Interactive Data Real-Time Services continues to generate growth for its real-time business both by sales to new customers and new sales to existing customers. In particular, financial institutions such as hedge funds are seeking to subscribe to our low latency data services in order to support their algorithmic and electronic trading applications. This business also continues to expand its Interactive Data Managed Solutions business globally with both existing and new clients. Interactive Data Real-Time Services continues to invest in enhancing and expanding its offerings and technical infrastructure. Growth in our Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics business in 2007 was largely offset by cancellations, the majority of which are resulting from client consolidation activities. We continue to invest in product and business development activities that we believe will help expand our Fixed Income Analytics business with existing and prospective customers in the United States, Europe and Australia. Active Trader Services eSignal’s growth has been driven by a combination of the expansion of its direct subscriber base and increased online advertising. Expansion of the eSignal business is partly dependent on the growth in online trading accounts managed by active traders. In addition, stock market volatility is another important trend that can influence active trader subscriptions. When the major stock markets are less volatile, active traders tend to trade less frequently and cancellations of eSignal’s services by active traders typically increase and new subscriptions slow. Other factors that may affect eSignal’s growth include the contribution of its redistribution partners who resell its data and analytics, and online advertising on its financial websites. We believe that eSignal’s future growth is dependent on a combination of expanding its direct subscriber base for real-time financial market information and decision-support tools, and attracting increased online advertising on eSignal’s financial websites. To address the evolving needs of active traders worldwide, eSignal continues to invest in adding new features to its various services, establishing strategic alliances, developing new offerings, and building traffic to and advertising on its financial websites.
24
Table of ContentsResults of Operations Selected Financial Data
25
Table of Contents2007 VERSUS 2006 Revenue
Total revenue increased by $77,207,000, or 12.6%, to $689,610,000 in 2007. The Xcitek business contributed revenue of $5,299,000 in 2007. In addition, the Quote.com business, which we acquired in March 2006, contributed incremental revenue of $2,372,000 in 2007. This is coupled with strong revenue growth at our Pricing and Reference Data of $37,525,000 and Real Time Services of $12,189,000, and modest expansion at our eSignal business of $3,414,000. Foreign exchange had a favorable impact on revenue of $16,452,000 in 2007, mainly due to the weakness of the US dollar against the UK pound sterling and the Euro. Institutional Services Revenue within the Institutional Services segment increased by $70,831,000, or 13.4%, to $601,247,000 in 2007. Foreign exchange had a favorable impact on revenue of $15,862,000 in 2007. Revenue for the Pricing and Reference Data business increased by $42,824,000, or 11.3%, to $420,720,000 in 2007. The Xcitek business contributed revenue of $5,299,000 in 2007. The revenue increase for the Pricing and Reference Data business was attributable primarily to growth in both North America and Europe. Pricing and Reference Data’s North American business generated revenue growth of $27,746,000 or 9.6%, and revenue for the European business of Pricing and Reference Data increased by $8,805,000, or 10.7%, in 2007. This growth is mainly due to higher demand for our evaluated pricing and reference data content, lower cancellation levels, and increased usage levels. Revenue in 2007 for the Asia Pacific business of Pricing and Reference Data increased by $974,000, or 13.0%, mainly due to revenue growth in Australia. Revenue for the Real-Time Services business increased by $12,189,000, or 10.2%, to $132,250,000 in 2007 primarily due to increased new business in both the real time datafeed and the managed solutions product areas. Revenue for the Fixed Income Analytics business decreased by $44,000, or 0.1%, to $32,415,000 in 2007. This decrease in revenue is mainly due to higher levels of cancellations, the majority of which were associated with client consolidation activities.
26
Table of ContentsActive Trader Services Within the Active Trader Services segment, revenue grew by $6,376,000, or 7.8%, to $88,363,000 in 2007. Foreign exchange had a favorable impact on revenue of $590,000 in 2007. The Quote.com business, which was acquired in March 2006, contributed incremental revenue of $2,372,000 in 2007. The increase in revenue within the Active Trader Services segment also reflects the deferral of revenue in the second quarter of 2006 associated with sales of software in multiple element arrangements which were subsequently recognized ratably over the term of the associated customer contracts. This is coupled with a higher number of core eSignal direct subscription terminals, which grew 2.9% to 63,539 in 2007, and higher average net subscription fees. Cost of Services Cost of services expenses are composed mainly of personnel-related expenses, communication, data acquisition, and consulting costs and expenditures associated with software and hardware maintenance agreements.
Cost of services expenses increased by $25,449,000, or 12.8 %, to $223,987,000 in 2007. The Xcitek business contributed cost of services expense of $2,077,000 in 2007, and the Quote.com business contributed incremental cost of services expenses of $446,000 in 2007. The increase in cost of services expenses is mainly due to higher personnel-related costs of $9,796,000 associated with increased headcount levels, the effect of annual merit increases, and higher incentive compensation coupled with higher data acquisition expense of $2,112,000. Also contributing to the increase in cost of services expense in 2007 were increased expenditures associated with hardware and software maintenance agreements of $1,468,000, higher premises-related expenses of $1,421,000, and increased consulting-related expenditures of $1,360,000. Foreign exchange increased cost of services expense by $5,818,000 in 2007. Cost of services expense as a percentage of revenue was 32.5% in 2007 compared with 32.4% in 2006. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses are composed mainly of personnel-related expense, outside professional services, advertising and marketing expenses, occupancy-related expenses, and commissions paid to third parties for distribution of our data to customers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $18,733,000, or 8.4%, to $240,520,000 in 2007. The Xcitek business contributed selling, general, and administrative expenses of $1,358,000 in 2007, and the Quote.com business contributed incremental selling, general and administrative expenses of $501,000 in 2007. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses is mainly due to higher personnel-related costs of $9,476,000 associated with increased headcount levels, the effect of annual merit increases, and higher incentive compensation costs. This is coupled with increased commissions paid to third parties for distribution of data of $3,258,000 and higher marketing expenditures of $1,060,000 primarily related to our brand and market awareness initiative. This is partially offset by lower premises-related costs of $1,937,000, a decrease in audit expenditures of $1,167,000, and lower bad debt expense of $1,096,000. Foreign exchange increased selling, general, and administrative expenses by $6,821,000 in 2007. Selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was 34.9% in 2007 compared with 36.2% in 2006. Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased by $1,185,000, or 5.4%, to $23,110,000 in 2007. The Xcitek business contributed depreciation expenses of $44,000 in 2007, and the Quote.com business contributed incremental depreciation expenses of $46,000 in 2007. The increase in depreciation expense was mainly associated with the 2006 build-out and relocation of our corporate headquarters in Bedford, Massachusetts and the relocation of our Real-Time Services facility to White Plains, New York. Foreign exchange increased depreciation expense by $413,000 in 2007.
27
Table of ContentsAmortization
Amortization expense increased by $785,000, or 3.1%, to $26,373,000 in 2007 primarily due to $547,000 of amortization expense associated with the Xcitek business coupled with $181,000 of incremental amortization associated with the Quote.com business. Other Consolidated Financial Information
Income from operations increased by $31,055,000, or 21.5%, to $175,620,000 in 2007 due to the factors discussed above. Interest income increased by $2,659,000, or 41.8%, to $9,025,000 in 2007. The increase in interest income is primarily due to higher average cash balances and higher interest rates. Income before income taxes increased by $33,714,000, or 22.3%, to $184,645,000 in 2007 due to higher income from operations coupled with higher interest income discussed above.
Net income increased by $32,621,000, or 34.9%, to $125,983,000 in 2007. The increase in net income is primarily due to higher income before income taxes coupled with a lower effective tax rate of 31.8% in 2007 compared with 38.1% in 2006. The decrease in the annual effective tax rate of 6.3% for 2007 in relation to the prior year effective rate is attributable to an increase in income generated in lower tax rate jurisdictions, a reduction in stock-based compensation expense recorded for incentive stock options under SFAS 123(R), the 2007 Research and Development Credit, increased Domestic Production Activities Deduction, an increase in Foreign Tax Credits, a German and UK tax rate reduction and a decrease in the 2007 Jersey (Channel Islands) corporate tax rate. In 2007, we recorded discrete tax benefits of $6,242,000, equivalent to 3.4% of our annual tax rate.
28
Table of Contents
We generated basic net income per share of $1.34 and diluted net income per share of $1.30 in 2007, compared with basic net income per share of $1.00 and diluted net income per share of $0.98 in 2006. Weighted average basic shares outstanding increased 0.9% and weighted average diluted shares outstanding increased 1.5% in 2007 compared to 2006. Options exercised by employees and the issuance of shares under the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan were partially offset by repurchases of shares of outstanding common stock under our publicly announced stock buyback program. 2006 VERSUS 2005 Revenue
Total revenue increased by $69,536,000, or 12.8%, to $612,403,000 in 2006. The acquisition of the Quote.com business contributed $10,045,000 in 2006. In addition, the Interactive Data Managed Solutions business, which we acquired in December 2005, contributed incremental revenue of $41,733,000 in 2006. This is coupled with revenue growth at our Pricing and Reference Data Services business of $23,980,000. The higher revenue is partially offset by $8,122,000 of revenue that was reversed and deferred at our Real-Time Services business in the fourth quarter of 2004 and subsequently recognized in the first quarter of 2005. The reversal and deferral was due to the fact that although we were providing services to, and receiving payment from a customer, there was no definitive service contract in place. A definitive contract was executed with this customer in the first quarter of 2005, and the revenue that was reversed and deferred in the fourth quarter of 2004 was recognized in the first quarter of 2005. Foreign exchange had a favorable impact of $1,361,000 on revenue in 2006, mainly due to the weakness of the US dollar against the UK pound sterling and the Euro. Institutional Services Revenue within the Institutional Services segment increased by $57,396,000, or 12.1%, to $530,416,000 in 2006. Foreign exchange had a favorable impact to revenue of $1,319,000 in 2006. Revenue for the Pricing and Reference Data Services business increased by $23,980,000, or 6.8%, to $376,938,000 in 2006. The revenue increase for the Pricing and Reference Data Services business was attributed primarily to growth in both
29
Table of ContentsNorth America and Europe. Pricing and Reference Data Services’ North American business generated revenue growth of $18,938,000 or 7.0% and the European business of Pricing and Reference Data Services increased revenue by $4,782,000, or 6.2% in 2006. This growth is due to continued demand for evaluated pricing and reference data services, increased levels of usage-related revenue, and lower levels of cancellations. Revenue in 2006 for the Asia Pacific business of Pricing and Reference Data Services increased by $260,000 or 3.6% in 2006 mainly due to revenue growth in Australia. Revenue for the Real-Time Services business increased by $32,032,000, or 36.5%, to $119,700,000 in 2006 primarily due to the acquisition of Interactive Data Managed Solutions which contributed incremental revenue of $41,733,000 in 2006. This is coupled with increased new business with institutional customers and the effect of lower cancellation levels. This increase was partially offset by the recognition in 2005 of $8,122,000 of revenue as previously described, coupled with the elimination of revenue associated with real-time services provided to Interactive Data Managed Solutions and Quote.com after the respective acquisition dates of these businesses. Revenue associated with services provided to Interactive Data Managed Solutions and Quote.com by Real-Time Services was $288,000 for the first two months of 2006 and $3,601,000 for 2005. Revenue for the Fixed Income Analytics business increased by $65,000 or 0.2%, to $32,459,000 in 2006 due to new sales being mostly offset by higher levels of cancellations, the majority of which were associated with client consolidation activities. Active Trader Services Within the Active Trader Services segment, revenue grew by $12,140,000, or 17.4%, to $81,987,000 in 2006. Foreign exchange had a favorable impact to revenue of $42,000 in 2006. The Quote.com business contributed revenue of $10,045,000 in 2006. The increase in revenue within the Active Trader Services segment also reflects a higher number of core eSignal direct subscription terminals, which grew by 8.4% to 49,675 in 2006. Cost of Services
Cost of services expenses increased by $31,449,000, or 18.8% in 2006. The Interactive Data Managed Solutions business contributed incremental cost of services expenses of $22,383,000 in 2006. In addition, the acquisition of the Quote.com business contributed cost of services expenses of $3,134,000 in 2006. This is coupled with the inclusion of $5,059,000 of incremental stock-based compensation expense associated with the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). Also contributing to the increase in cost of services expense in 2006 were higher personnel costs of $3,140,000 related to higher staffing levels, annual salary increases and increased incentive compensation. This is partially offset by lower consulting expense of $1,677,000 and a decrease in communications expenditures of $1,050,000. Foreign exchange increased cost of services expense by $404,000 in 2006. Cost of services expense as a percentage of revenue was 32.4% in 2006 compared with 30.8% in 2005. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $30,172,000, or 15.7%, in 2006. The Interactive Data Managed Solutions business contributed incremental selling, general and administrative expenses of $16,963,000 in 2006. Additionally, the acquisition of the Quote.com business contributed selling, general, and administrative expenses of $1,724,000 in 2006. This is coupled with the inclusion of $7,845,000 of incremental stock-based compensation expense associated with the adoption of SFAS 123(R). Also contributing to the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2006 were higher personnel costs of $10,803,000 related to higher staffing levels, annual salary increases, and increased incentive compensation. In addition, increased premises expenses of $2,246,000 mainly associated with the move of our corporate headquarters office in Bedford, Massachusetts and the relocation of our Real-Time Services facility to White Plains, New York contributed to the increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses. This is partially offset by the recognition in the first quarter of 2005 of $6,702,000 related to direct costs paid and associated with services delivered to a customer as previously described. Additionally offsetting the increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses were
30
Table of Contentslower commissions paid to third parties of $2,904,000 in 2006 mainly associated with providing real-time services to Interactive Data Managed Solutions prior to our acquisition of that business and lower bad debt expense of $979,000. Foreign exchange increased selling, general, and administrative expenses by $644,000 in 2006. Selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was 36.2% in 2006 compared with 35.3% in 2005. Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased by $3,158,000, or 16.8%, in 2006. The Interactive Data Managed Solutions business contributed incremental depreciation expense of $1,327,000 in 2006. In addition, the acquisition of the Quote.com business contributed depreciation expense of $177,000 in 2006. Also contributing to the increase in depreciation expense in 2006 was higher depreciation expense mainly associated with the 2006 build-out of our Corporate Headquarters in Bedford, Massachusetts and increased depreciation expense related to incremental capital expenditures in 2006. Foreign exchange increased depreciation expense by $43,000 in 2006. Amortization
Amortization expense increased by $4,332,000, or 20.4%, in 2006 primarily due to $3,525,000 of amortization expense related to the acquisition of the Interactive Data Managed Solutions business coupled with $1,120,000 of amortization associated with the acquisition of the Quote.com business. This is partially offset by lower amortization expense of $266,000 related to the normal expiration of intangible asset lives in 2006. Other Consolidated Financial Information Income from operations increased by $425,000, or 0.3%, to $144,565,000 in 2006 due to the factors discussed above. Interest income increased by $1,655,000, or 35.1%, to $6,366,000 in 2006 due to higher average cash balances and higher interest rates. Income before income taxes increased by $2,080,000, or 1.4%, to 150,931,000 in 2006 due to higher income from operations coupled with higher interest income. Net income decreased by $502,000, or 0.5%, to $93,362,000 in 2006 due to a higher effective tax rate in 2006 of 38.1% compared with 36.9% in 2005, partially offset by higher income before income taxes as discussed above. We generated basic net income per share of $1.00 and diluted net income per share of $0.98 in 2006, compared with basic net income per share of $1.01 and diluted net income per share of $0.98 in 2005. Weighted average basic shares outstanding remained essentially unchanged and weighted average diluted shares outstanding decreased 0.4% in 2006 compared to 2005. Options exercised by employees and the issuance of shares under the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan were offset by repurchases of shares of outstanding common stock under our publicly announced stock buyback program. Liquidity and Capital Resources Our cash needs arise primarily from the purchase of equipment and the improvements of facilities, including investments in our underlying infrastructure to expand the capacity of our data centers. We also use cash to fund working capital requirements and acquisitions, to support business growth initiatives, to pay dividends to stockholders, and to repurchase shares of our common stock under our stock repurchase program. We continue to generate cash from operations and believe we remain in a strong financial position. Management believes that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, combined with expected cash flows generated by operating activities, will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months. We currently have no long-term debt.
31
Table of ContentsThe following table summarizes our cash flow activities for the periods indicated:
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $10,997,000, or 6.3%, to $184,562,000 in 2007. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher net income of $32,621,000 in 2007 compared with 2006. This is partially offset by a reduction in working capital of $17,359,000 mainly due to the timing of payables and higher tax payments in 2007. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $43,983,000, or 33.9%, to $173,565,000 in 2006. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was mainly due to an improvement in our working capital due to the timing of tax payments and higher accrual and payable balances in 2006 as compared to 2005. This improvement in working capital was partially offset by higher account receivable balances in 2006. Also contributing to the increase in net cash from operating activities was an increase in non-cash items in 2006, which are primarily related to stock-based compensation expense associated with the adoption of SFAS 123(R) and higher amortization expense. Investing Activities
Capital expenditures decreased by $2,190,000, or 5.6%, to $36,809,000 in 2007 mainly due to higher capital spending in 2006 associated with the 2006 build out and move of our corporate headquarter offices in Bedford, Massachusetts and the relocation of our Real-Time Services facility to White Plains, New York.
32
Table of ContentsCapital expenditures increased by $12,939,000 or 49.7% to $38,999,000 in 2006. This increase in capital expenditures was due mainly to higher capital spending in 2006 associated with the build out and move of our corporate headquarters offices in Bedford, Massachusetts and the relocation of the Real-Time Services’ White Plains, New York facility. The increase is also due to the development of internal use software associated with our data center consolidation and research and development initiatives. In 2008, we expect to spend from $45,000,000 to $ 47,000,000 in capital expenditures mainly focused on scaling our real-time datafeed and managed solutions infrastructures. In 2007, we purchased municipal bonds of $194,524,000 with original maturities greater than 90 days but remaining maturities of less than one year and had matured $163,801,000 of municipal bonds with original maturities greater than 90 days but remaining maturities of less than one year. In 2006, we purchased municipal bonds of $138,429,000 with original maturities greater than 90 days but remaining maturities of less than one year and had matured $119,909,000 of municipal bonds with original maturities greater than 90 days but remaining maturities of less than one year. In 2005, we purchased municipal bonds of $193,000,000 with original maturities greater than 90 days but remaining maturities of less than one year and had matured $168,394,000 of municipal bonds with original maturities greater than 90 days but with remaining maturities of less than one year. We engage third-party investment advisers to advise us in connection with our investments. In December 2005, we acquired approximately 95.1% of the stock of IS.Teledata (currently known as Interactive Data Managed Solutions) for $54,628,000 in cash, offset by cash acquired of $5,212,000. We funded this acquisition from existing cash resources. In 2006, we increased our ownership of Interactive Data Managed Solutions from 95.1% to 100.0% for $2,914,000 in cash. In March 2006, we acquired the net assets of Quote.com and other related assets from Lycos, Inc. for $30,000,000 in cash. We funded these acquisitions from our existing cash resources. In May 2007, we acquired the net assets comprising the market data division of Xcitek LLC, as well as the market data net assets of its affiliate Xcitax LLC for $25,123,000. We funded this acquisition from our existing cash resources. Financing Activities
In February 2007 our Board of Directors authorized the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend. In 2007, we paid quarterly cash dividends to stockholders in the following amounts on the following dates:
33
Table of ContentsThe actual declaration of any future dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates, is subject to final determination by our Board of Directors. On December 5, 2006, we paid a special dividend of $0.80 per common share. The dividend was declared by the Board of Directors on October 25, 2006 and was payable to stockholders of record as of November 9, 2006. The aggregate dividend totaled $74,581,000 and was paid from existing cash resources. On July 7, 2005, we paid a special dividend of $0.80 per common share. The dividend was declared by the Board of Directors on May 31, 2005 and was payable to stockholders of record as of June 15, 2005. The aggregate dividend totaled $74,489,000 and was paid from existing cash resources. In 2007, we utilized $31,816,000 to repurchase 1,177,000 outstanding shares of common stock under our publicly announced stock buyback program. Also in 2007, we received $31,413,000 from the exercise of options to purchase 2,004,000 shares of common stock issued pursuant to our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the purchase of 186,000 shares of common stock by employees under our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In 2006, we utilized $31,103,000 to repurchase 1,500,000 outstanding shares of common stock under our publicly announced stock buyback program. Also in 2006, we received $19,027,000 from the exercise of options to purchase 1,294,000 shares of common stock issued pursuant to our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the purchase of 206,000 shares of common stock by employees under our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In 2005, we utilized $30,279,000 to repurchase 1,407,000 outstanding shares of common stock under our publicly announced stock buyback program. Also in 2005, we received $19,574,000 from the exercise of options to purchase 1,412,000 shares of common stock issued pursuant to our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the purchase of 178,000 shares of common stock by employees under our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Management believes that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, combined with expected cash flows generated by operating activities, will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months. We currently have no long-term debt. Income Taxes Our effective income tax rate was 31.8%, 38.1%, and 36.9%, in 2007, 2006, and 2005 respectively. The difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal rate of 35% for these years is due primarily to state and local taxes, an increase in income generated in lower tax jurisdictions, adjustments to the taxable amount of stock based compensation related to SFAS 123(R), the Domestic Production Activities Deduction, the Research and Development Credit and German and UK tax rate reductions enacted in 2007 effective in 2008. The decrease in the annual effective tax rate of 6.3% in 2007 in relation to the prior year effective rate is attributable to an increase in income generated in lower tax jurisdictions, a reduction in stock-based compensation expense recorded for incentive stock options under SFAS 123(R), the 2007 Research and Development Credit, increased Domestic Production Activities Deduction, an increase in Foreign Tax Credits, a German and UK tax rate reduction and a decrease in the 2007 Jersey (Channel Islands) corporate tax rate. In 2007, we recorded discrete tax benefits of $6,242,000, equivalent to 3.4% of our annual tax rate. In the first quarter a discrete benefit was recorded related to (i) the release of state tax reserves of $161,000 which was the result of concluding a state audit, (ii) a $297,000 tax benefit from a Capital Loss Carryback to prior years, and (iii) realized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense of $96,000. In the second quarter the net discrete benefit amount is related to (i) interest expense charge on tax reserves for uncertain tax positions of $245,000, formerly reported as part of the effective tax rate, offset by (ii) $173,000 of realized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense, and (iii) a discrete benefit of $88,000 resulting from a reduction to the net deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2007, as a result of state tax rate reduction enacted in the second quarter. In the third quarter we released tax reserves of $1,064,000 and interest associated with these tax reserves of $193,000 that were no longer required as a result of the expiration of a statute of limitation. We filed our 2006 federal tax return in the third quarter and recorded a benefit of $1,479,000 principally related to (i) an $866,200 net tax benefit related to the Research and Development Credit and (ii) $196,900 tax benefit for the Domestic Production Activities Deduction. We also
34
Table of Contentsrealized tax benefits related to (i) stock-based compensation expense of $73,000 and (ii) a discrete benefit of $2,535,000 related to a German tax rate reduction enacted in the third quarter that is effective in 2008. The interest expense charge on tax reserves for uncertain tax positions was $47,000 during the quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2007 we recorded a net discrete benefit of $375,000 related to (i) interest expense charge on tax reserves for uncertain tax positions of $ 17,000, (ii) a discrete tax charge of $438,000 related to a UK tax rate reduction enacted in 2007 that is effective in 2008, offset by (iii) $ 66,000 of realized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense, and (iv) we filed our 2006 state tax returns in the fourth quarter and recorded a benefit of $764,000 principally related to a net tax benefit for the Research and Development Credit at the state level. We recognize future tax benefits or expenses attributable to our taxable temporary differences and net operating loss carry forwards. Recognition of deferred tax assets is subject to our determination that realization is more likely than not. Based on taxable income projections, we believe that the recorded deferred tax assets will be realized. We adopted the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, we had approximately $9,177,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $8,518,000 would affect our effective tax rate if recognized and $659,000 would result in an increase to goodwill. As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately $15,983,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $15,324,000 would affect our effective tax rate if recognized and $659,000 would result in an increase to goodwill. In 2007, we released $1,064,000 in unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions for various tax jurisdictions due to lapsing of statute of limitations and settled various state audits. Additionally, we reclassified taxes payable to unrecognized tax benefits related to prior years and 2007, of $3,604,000 and $2,353,000 respectively, for unrecognized tax benefits in the United Kingdom. While it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months, we do not expect the change to have a significant impact on the results of operations or the financial position of the Company. We have classified the non-current unrecognized tax benefits of $7,667,000 to non-current income taxes payable on the balance sheet at December 31, 2007. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of the date of adoption, we had accrued interest of approximately $1,533,000 related to unrecognized tax benefits. At December 31, 2007, we had a balance of $1,825,000 related to unrecognized tax benefits. We file federal, state and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. Generally, the 2004 through 2007 tax years remain subject to examination for federal, 2002 through 2007 for significant states and 2005 through 2007 for foreign tax authorities. The following table summarizes our 2007 activity for Unrecognized Tax Benefits, pursuant to the provisions of FIN 48:
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements. Related Party Transactions Pearson indirectly owns approximately 61% of our issued and outstanding common stock. We are party to a management services agreement with Pearson that became effective as of February 29, 2000. This agreement governs the provision of certain services between the parties and their respective subsidiaries and renews annually. Other business arrangements between us (and our subsidiaries) and Pearson (and its subsidiaries) are covered by separate written agreements.
35
Table of ContentsMany of the services provided by Pearson afford us administrative convenience and we believe the terms of such services are substantially equal to or more favorable to us than if we had negotiated similar arrangements with non-affiliated third parties. The services provided by Pearson include (i) administering the 401(k) savings plan (and related excess plans), the UK pension plan, and employee health benefit plans and insurance plans in the US and UK, (ii) use of a back-up disaster recovery site in the UK, (iii) travel services, and (iv) accounting and tax related services for certain of our subsidiaries, primarily in the UK. In addition to these services, we also license an array of financial information content from certain businesses owned by or affiliated with Pearson for internal use as well as redistribution to customers. Finally, certain of our businesses from time to time purchase advertising space and other promotional services at discounted rates from certain businesses owned by or affiliated with Pearson. The services provided by us to Pearson include the provision of financial data and related services. A majority of the charges for services from Pearson and its affiliates to us are at cost. With respect to the services we provide to Pearson and its affiliates, we charge fees that are no less than the fees charged to similar users. We believe that the terms and conditions of these transactions are fair and reasonable. Prior to entering into any service arrangement with Pearson, we assess whether it would be more advantageous to obtain such services from a third party. The Independent Committee of our Board of Directors, which currently consists of four directors, none of whom are our employees or employees of Pearson, approve the related party services on our behalf. The agreements governing the related party services are amended from time to time by mutual agreement to address changes in the terms or services provided to or on our behalf. The Independent Committee approves any material modifications. From time to time, we assess various of the ongoing relationships between us and Pearson to determine whether it would be more advantageous to secure any such services outside of Pearson. There was no material effect on our financial condition or results of operations as a result of entering into these arrangements. If the services provided to us by Pearson or its affiliates were to be terminated, we would be required to seek equivalent services in the open market at potentially higher costs. In 2001, we entered into a trademark license agreement with Pearson’s Financial Times Group authorizing us to use the “FT” and “Financial Times” trademarks and logos in our businesses. The license grants us the right to use the FT and Financial Times brands for one UK pound sterling. This license, which was renewed for a one-year term on March 7, 2007, automatically renews for subsequent one-year terms unless terminated. The license is subject to quality control standards, restrictions on sublicensing the trademarks to third parties and certain other restrictions. The Independent Committee of our Board of Directors approved this agreement on our behalf. In February 2007, we commenced a re-branding campaign and in connection with this campaign, we ceased the active use of the “FT” and “Financial Times” trademarks and logos in our businesses. Any amounts payable or receivable to and from Pearson or Pearson affiliates are classified as an affiliate transaction on our balance sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we recorded revenue of $772,000, $755,000 and $451,000, respectively, for services provided to Pearson. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we recorded expense of $4,682,000, $4,250,000 and $3,456,000, respectively, for services received from Pearson. The amount due to Pearson at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $732,000 and $5,156,000, respectively, and is included in payables to affiliates. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the US. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to stock-based compensation, revenue recognition, goodwill and intangible assets, accrued liabilities and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
36
Table of ContentsWe believe the following critical accounting policies require our most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements: Stock-Based Compensation On January 1, 2006, the Company implemented the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value. The Company selected the modified prospective transition method for implementing SFAS 123(R) and began recognizing compensation expenses for stock-based awards granted on or after January 1, 2006, plus any unvested awards granted prior to January 1, 2006. Under this transition method, prior periods have not been restated. Stock-based compensation expenses for awards granted on or after January 1, 2006, are based on the grant date fair value calculated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards, less estimated forfeitures, is amortized over the awards’ vesting periods on a straight-line basis. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for the costs of its stock-based employee compensation plans under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Accordingly, the Company did not recognize compensation expense on stock options granted where the exercise price at least equaled the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) regarding the SEC Staff’s interpretation of SFAS 123(R) which provides the Staff’s views regarding interactions between SFAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Company has incorporated the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R). The fair value of each option grant on the grant date was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield, weighted average expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and weighted average expected term of the options. Under SFAS 123(R), the Company’s expected volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was based exclusively on historical volatility and the expected term assumption was established based upon an analysis of historical option exercise behavior and post-vest termination data. The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes model was based on the implied yield currently available on US Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the Company’s expected term assumption. The expected dividend yield reflects our historical dividend yield, excluding special dividends, and is calculated by annualizing the quarterly cash dividends declared by our Board of Directors divided by the closing price of our common stock on the declaration date of each dividend. The actual declaration of future dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates, is subject to final determination by our Board of Directors. Refer to Note 7, “Stock-based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. Revenue Recognition Revenue recognition is governed by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sale price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. For customer service contracts that include a fixed subscription fee for the right to access data over a specified contractual period, revenue is recognized on a straight line basis over the contract term. For customer contracts that include variable fees based on usage, revenue is recognized in the month that the data is delivered to customers. Deferred revenue represents contractual billings in excess of revenue recognized. Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill is recorded in connection with business acquisitions and represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets at the acquisition date. We perform impairment tests of goodwill assigned to our reporting units on an annual basis or whenever events or circumstances indicate an impairment may exist. Each impairment test is based upon a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit, determined using a discounted cash flow model, to the net book value of the reporting unit. Projections used in these analyses are consistent with those used to manage our business and make capital allocation decisions. If impairment is indicated due to the book value being in excess of the fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value.
37
Table of ContentsOther intangible assets include securities databases, computer software and technology, covenants not to compete, trademarks, service contracts and customer lists arising principally from acquisitions. Such intangibles are valued on the acquisition dates based on a combination of replacement cost, comparable purchase methodologies and discounted cash flows and are amortized on a straight line basis, which approximate the economic consumption, for periods ranging from three months to twenty five years. Income Taxes We determine our income tax expense in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. The income tax expense includes an estimate of the current tax expense as well as a deferred tax expense which results from the determination of temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for book and tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured by applying enacted tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such differences are expected to reverse. We currently provide income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries and associated companies to the extent these earnings are currently taxable or expected to be remitted. Taxes have not been provided on approximately $120,000,000 of accumulated foreign unremitted earnings, which are expected to remain invested indefinitely. Quantification of the deferred tax liability, if any, associated with indefinitely reinvested earnings is not practicable. We recognize future tax benefits or expenses attributable to our taxable temporary differences and net operating loss carry forwards. We recognize deferred tax assets to the extent that the recoverability of these assets satisfy the “more likely than not” recognition criteria in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Based upon historical income and projections of future taxable income, we believe that the recorded deferred tax assets will be realized. Commitments and Contingencies We have no outstanding debt. We meet our existing working capital and capital expenditure needs from our existing operating cash flow. The Company has obligations under non-cancelable operating leases for real estate and equipment. In addition, the Company has purchase obligations for data content. Certain of the leases include renewal options and escalation clauses. Real estate leases are for the Company’s corporate headquarters, sales offices, major operating units and data centers. Future contractual obligations, as of December 31, 2007, are summarized in the chart below.
We expect to satisfy our lease and other contractual obligations from our existing cash flow. Our key operating locations operate in facilities under long-term leases, the earliest of which will expire in 2008. We believe we will be able to successfully negotiate key operating leases and/or find alternative locations for our facilities without significant interruption to the business. In addition to the amounts shown in the table above, $18,708,000 of unrecognized tax benefits have been recorded in income taxes payable in accordance with FIN 48, as we are uncertain if or when such amounts may be settled. Related to these unrecognized tax benefits, we have also recorded in income taxes payable $1,825,000 for potential interest and penalties at December 31, 2007. Inflation Although management believes that inflation has not had a material effect on the results of operations during the past three years, there can be no assurance that results of operations will not be affected by inflation in the future.
38
Table of ContentsSeasonality and Market Activity Historically, we have not experienced any material seasonal fluctuations in our business and we do not expect to experience seasonal fluctuations in the future. However, financial information market demand is largely dependent upon activity levels in the securities markets. In the event that the US or international financial markets were to suffer a prolonged downturn that results in a significant decline in investor activity in trading securities, our sales and revenue could be adversely affected. The degree of such consequences is uncertain. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards “Accounting for Income Taxes” No. 109 (“SFAS 109”). FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 with the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption of this standard. FIN 48 requires that we recognize in our financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognizing, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition attributable to the tax position. The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The adoption of FIN 48 did not materially impact the company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 10, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. Fair Value Measurements In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for how companies should measure the fair value of assets and liabilities and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Additionally, SFAS 157 formally defines fair value as the amount that would be received if an asset was sold or a liability transferred in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 is effective for the company in 2008. Based on our current operations, we do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have a material impact on our financial statements. The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (as amended) In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides entities with an option to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. If elected, an entity must report unrealized gains and losses on the item in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the equity method, is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs); and is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS 159 is effective for the company in 2008. We are currently evaluating if we will elect the fair value option for any of our eligible financial instruments and other items and currently we do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material impact on our financial statements. Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by EITF on Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 addresses the issue of the manner in which income tax benefits received on dividends paid to employees holding equity-classified non-vested shares (units or options) should be accounted for when such dividends are charged to retained earnings pursuant to SFAS 123(R). EITF 06-11 concludes that a realized income tax benefit should be recognized as a credit to additional paid-in capital and should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. In addition, the amount of any tax benefits from dividends reclassified in subsequent periods from additional paid-in capital to a reduction of income tax expense or an increase in income tax benefit should increase or decrease, but, be limited to the pool of excess tax benefits available on the reclassification date. EITF 06-11 is effective for the company in 2008. Currently, we do not expect that EITF 06-11 will have a material impact on our financial statements
39
Table of ContentsBusiness Combinations In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) changes the accounting for business combinations including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. SFAS 141(R) is effective for the Company in 2009, with early adoption prohibited. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SFAS 141(R). Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interests In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 changes the accounting for noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of consolidated stockholders’ equity, and the elimination of “minority interest” accounting in results of operations with earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests reported as part of consolidated earnings. Additionally, SFAS 160 revises the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent’s controlling ownership interest. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company in 2009, with early adoption prohibited. Currently the Company does not anticipate that SFAS 160 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements From time to time, including in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Annual Report to stockholders, we may issue forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, strategy, plans, critical accounting policies, technological developments, new services, consolidation activities, research and development activities, regulatory, market and industry trends, and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and federal securities laws provide safe harbors for forward-looking statements. We note that a variety of factors, including known and unknown risks and uncertainties as well as incorrect assumptions, could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. The factors that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business include those discussed under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
A portion of our business is conducted outside the United States through our foreign subsidiaries and branches. We have foreign currency exposure related to operations in international markets where we transact business in foreign currencies and, accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Our foreign subsidiaries maintain their accounting records in their respective local currencies. Consequently, changes in currency exchange rates may impact the translation of foreign statements of operations into US dollars, which may in turn affect our consolidated statements of operations. Currently, our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk rests with the UK pound sterling and the Euro to US dollar exchange rate due to the significant size of our operations in Europe. The effect of foreign exchange on our business historically has varied from quarter to quarter and may continue to do so. Please refer to Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion of the impact of foreign exchange on the Company.
40
Table of ContentsTotal revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and long lived assets as of December 31, 2007, and 2006, respectively by geographic region outside the United States, are as follows:
We do not currently enter into any hedging or derivative arrangements and we do not currently hold any market risk sensitive instruments for investment or other purposes. We currently invest excess cash balances primarily in cash deposits held at major banks, money market fund accounts, and marketable securities. The money market fund accounts and marketable securities largely consist of US Government obligations, investment grade commercial paper and high credit quality municipal obligations; accordingly, we are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. We believe that the effect, if any, of reasonable near-term changes in interest rates on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows will not be material.
41
Table of Contents
42
Table of ContentsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interactive Data Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Interactive Data Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our audit also included the valuation and qualifying accounts and the activity therein as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 in the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Interactive Data Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the valuation and qualifying accounts and the activity therein as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 in the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Interactive Data Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Boston, Massachusetts February 25, 2008
43
Table of ContentsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interactive Data Corporation: We have audited Interactive Data Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Interactive Data Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Interactive Data Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2007 consolidated financial statements of Interactive Data Corporation and subsidiaries and our report dated February 25, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Boston, Massachusetts February 25, 2008
44
Table of ContentsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Interactive Data Corporation: In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Interactive Data Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) Share-Based Payment as of January 1, 2006. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Boston, Massachusetts February 28, 2007, except for the adjustments to retrospectively reflect the allocation of goodwill to reportable segments as described in Note 5, to retrospectively reflect the allocation of goodwill, intangible assets, capital additions and depreciation expense to reportable segments, and to retrospectively reflect the reallocation of certain personnel, premises and marketing and advertising costs, as described in Note 13, as to which the date is February 27, 2008
45
Table of ContentsInteractive Data Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
46
Table of ContentsInteractive Data Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
Table of ContentsInteractive Data Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
48
Table of ContentsInteractive Data Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
49
Table of ContentsInteractive Data Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Nature of Business Interactive Data Corporation (the “Company”) is a leading global provider of financial market data, analytics and related services to financial institutions, active traders and individual investors. The Company offers its services to its customers through two reportable business segments: Institutional Services and Active Trader Services. The Institutional Services segment of the Company’s business primarily targets financial institutions such as banks, brokerage firms, mutual fund companies, hedge funds, insurance companies, money management firms, financial information providers, information media companies, third-party redistributors and outsourcing organizations by providing services that may be used in determining portfolio and individual security valuations, processing transactions, preparing account statements and other reports, addressing regulatory compliance requirements, and conducting investment research and analysis. The Institutional Services segment is composed of three businesses, each of which was renamed in February 2007 as part of a global marketing initiative to reinforce our value proposition and emphasize the Interactive Data brand to institutional customers: Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data (formerly FT Interactive Data), Interactive Data Real-Time Services (formerly ComStock) and Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics (formerly CMS BondEdge). The Active Trader Services segment of the Company’s business targets active traders, individual investors and investment community professionals, by providing real-time financial market information and access to related decision-support tools. Active traders typically make their own investment decisions, trade frequently through online brokerage accounts and seek to earn a substantial portion of their income from trading. The Active Trader Services segment is composed of one business: eSignal. On February 29, 2000, Data Broadcasting Corporation completed a merger (“the Merger”) with Interactive Data Corporation (now known as Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of Pearson Longman, Inc. (“Pearson Longman”). Pearson Longman, through a series of other entities, is wholly owned by Pearson plc (“Pearson”). Upon completion of the Merger, the Company issued 56,424,000 shares of its common stock to Pearson Longman that resulted in the ownership by Pearson Longman of approximately 60% of the Company as of the effective date of the merger. On January 6, 2006, Pearson acquired an additional 1,131,000 shares of the Company common stock from one of our former directors bringing the total held by Pearson to 57,555,000 or approximately 61% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2007. Interactive Data Corporation prior to the Merger is referred to herein as Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, which continues to be the Company’s major institutional services business. The Merger was accounted for as a reverse merger as discussed in Note 3, “Mergers and Acquisitions” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The shares of the Company held by Pearson Longman were subsequently transferred to Pearson DBC Holdings, Inc., another wholly owned subsidiary of Pearson Longman. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the results of the Company and all majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash deposits held at major banks, money market fund accounts and other temporary cash investments. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Marketable Securities The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” in accounting for our marketable securities. Investments consist of high-grade municipal obligations with original maturities of greater than 90 days and remaining maturities of less than one year. All marketable securities have been classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair market value. Unrealized gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity.
50
Table of ContentsMarketable securities by security type at December 31, 2007 were as follows:
Marketable securities by security type at December 31, 2006 were as follows:
There were no sales of our marketable securities for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables approximates their fair value because of the short maturity of these investments. Revenue Recognition Revenue recognition is governed by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sale price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. For customer service contracts that include a fixed subscription fee for the right to access data over a specified contractual period, revenue is recognized on a straight line basis over the contract term. For customer contracts that include variable fees based on usage, revenue is recognized in the month that the data is delivered to customers. Deferred revenue represents contractual billings in excess of revenue recognized. Accounts Receivable, Concentration of Credit Risk and Uncertainties, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company is subject to credit risk through trade receivables. Credit risk with respect to trade receivables is mitigated by the diversification of the Company’s operations, as well as its large customer base and its geographical dispersion. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of revenue or more than 10% of accounts receivable for any period presented. Ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition are performed although collateral is not required. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses and such losses, in the aggregate, have not exceeded management’s previously established estimates. At December 31, 2007, management believes that the Company had no significant concentrations of credit risk. The Company maintains a reserve for an allowance for doubtful accounts and sales credits that is the Company’s best estimate of potentially uncollectible trade receivables. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices that are considered potentially uncollectible in whole or in part. For those invoices not specifically reviewed or considered uncollectible, general provisions are provided at different rates, based upon the age of the receivable, historical experience, and other currently available evidence. The reserve estimates are adjusted as additional information becomes known or payments are made. Income Taxes The Company determines its income tax expense in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. The income tax expense includes an estimate of the current tax expense as well as a deferred tax expense which results from the determination of temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for book and tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured by applying enacted tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such differences are expected to reverse. The Company currently provides income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries and associated companies to the extent these earnings are currently taxable or expected to be remitted. Taxes have not been provided on approximately $120,000,000 of accumulated foreign unremitted earnings, which are expected to remain invested indefinitely. Quantification of the deferred tax liability, if any, associated with indefinitely reinvested earnings is not practicable.
51
Table of ContentsThe Company recognizes future tax benefits or expenses attributable to our taxable temporary differences and net operating loss carry forwards. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that the recoverability of these assets satisfy the “more likely than not” recognition criteria in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Based upon historical income and projections of future taxable income, the Company believes that the recorded deferred tax assets will be realized. Goodwill Goodwill is recorded in connection with business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets at the acquisition date. The Company determines its reporting units based upon the criteria in FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and other Intangibles Assets”. The Company performs impairment tests of goodwill assigned to various reporting units on an annual basis or whenever events or circumstances indicate an impairment may exist. Each impairment test is based upon a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit to the book value of the related assets. If impairment is indicated due to the net book value being in excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Intangible Assets Other intangible assets include securities databases, computer software and technology, covenants not to compete, trademarks, service contracts and customer lists arising principally from acquisitions. Such intangibles are valued on the acquisition dates based on a combination of replacement cost, comparable purchase methodologies and discounted cash flows and are amortized on a straight line basis, which approximate the economic consumption, for periods ranging from three months to twenty five years. Property, Equipment and Capitalized Software Fixed assets are recorded at cost. Equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life of three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases or useful lives, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Retirements, sales and disposals of assets are recorded by removing the cost and accumulated depreciation from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts with the resulting gain or loss reflected in income. Capitalized software costs include costs incurred in connection with the development of software and purchased software for internal use and are capitalized in accordance with the provisions of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” These costs relate to software used by subscribers to access, manage and analyze information in the Company’s databases. Capitalized costs are amortized over the estimated economic life, which typically ranges from three to five years. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recovered or that the remaining useful lives are no longer appropriate. If an impairment is indicated, the Company compares the fair value of the related asset, generally determined using a discounted cash flow methodology, to the carrying value of the asset and records an impairment charge to the extent that fair value is lower than the carrying value of the asset. Translation of Foreign Currencies The functional currency of certain businesses within the consolidated financial statements is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign companies are translated into US dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date; income and expense items and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Cumulative net translation adjustments are included in stockholders’ equity as other comprehensive income. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions, not significant in amount, are included in the results of operations as selling, general and administrative expense or revenue depending on the nature of the transaction. Use of Estimates The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the extensive use of management’s estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the consolidated financial statement date. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
52
Table of ContentsResearch and Development Costs Expenditures for research and development are expensed as incurred. The Company recorded $5,798,000, $4,941,000 and $3,573,000 in research and development costs during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, primarily related to the development of new services. Research and development costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in accompanying statement of operations. Advertising Costs Advertising expenditures consist of print media, radio, television, direct marketing and trade shows. All advertising expenses are charged to income during the period incurred and totaled $7,447,000, $6,759,000 and $6,511,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Stock-Based Compensation The Company follows SFAS 123(R). SFAS 123(R) requires that all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, are recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Refer to Note 7, “Stock-based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. Earnings per Share We calculate earnings per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, “Earnings per Share” (“EPS”) and apply the treasury stock method in computing the weighted-average shares outstanding used in the diluted earnings per share calculation. Under the treasury stock method, the assumed proceeds calculation includes the actual proceeds to be received from the employee upon exercise, the average unrecognized compensation cost during the period and any tax benefits credited upon exercise to additional paid-in-capital. The treasury stock method assumes that a company uses the proceeds from the exercise of awards to repurchase common stock at the average market price for the period. Windfall tax benefits created upon the exercise of an award would be added to assumed proceeds, while shortfalls charged to additional paid in capital would be deducted from assumed proceeds. Any shortfalls not covered by the windfall tax pool would be charged to the income statement and would be excluded from the calculation of assumed proceeds, if any. Stock options representing the right to acquire 1,512,400, 3,515,000 and 1,700 shares of common stock during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share because the effect would have been antidilutive. Additionally, zero deferred and restricted stock units, 11,620 deferred and restricted stock units and 107,316 deferred stock units were outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and were also excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share as they were antidilutive. Although these share based awards were antidilutive in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, they may be dilutive in future quarters’ calculations. Below is a reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands, except per share information):
53
Table of Contents2. New Accounting Pronouncements Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards “Accounting for Income Taxes” No. 109 (“SFAS 109”). FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 with the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption of this standard. FIN 48 requires that we recognize in our financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognizing, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition attributable to the tax position. The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The adoption of FIN 48 did not materially impact the company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 10, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. Fair Value Measurements In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for how companies should measure the fair value of assets and liabilities and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Additionally, SFAS 157 formally defines fair value as the amount that would be received if an asset was sold or a liability transferred in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 is effective for the company in 2008. Based on the Company’s current operations, the Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (as amended) In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides entities with an option to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. If elected, an entity must report unrealized gains and losses on the item in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the equity method, is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs); and is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS 159 is effective for the company in 2008. We are currently evaluating if we will elect the fair value option for any of our eligible financial instruments and other items and currently the Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by EITF on Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 addresses the issue of the manner in which income tax benefits received on dividends paid to employees holding equity-classified non-vested shares (units or options) should be accounted for when such dividends are charged to retained earnings pursuant to SFAS 123(R). EITF 06-11 concludes that a realized income tax benefit should be recognized as a credit to additional paid-in capital and should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. In addition, the amount of any tax benefits from dividends reclassified in subsequent periods from additional paid-in capital to a reduction of income tax expense or an increase in income tax benefit should increase or decrease, but, be limited to the pool of excess tax benefits available on the reclassification date. EITF 06-11 is effective for the company in 2008. Currently, the Company does not anticipate that EITF 06-11 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Business Combinations In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) changes the accounting for business combinations including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. SFAS 141(R) is effective for the Company in 2009, with early adoption prohibited. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SFAS 141(R).
54
Table of ContentsAccounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interests In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 changes the accounting for noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of consolidated stockholders’ equity, and the elimination of “minority interest” accounting in results of operations with earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests reported as part of consolidated earnings. Additionally, SFAS 160 revises the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent’s controlling ownership interest. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company in 2009, with early adoption prohibited. Currently the Company does not anticipate that SFAS 160 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. 3. Mergers and Acquisitions Merger with Data Broadcasting Corporation In 2000, Data Broadcasting Corporation (now known as Interactive Data Corporation) completed the merger with Interactive Data Corporation (now known as Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of Pearson Longman. Pearson Longman, through a series of other entities, is wholly owned by Pearson. Upon completion of the merger, the Company issued 56,424,000 shares of its common stock to Pearson Longman that resulted in the ownership by Pearson Longman of approximately 60% of the Company as of the effective date of the merger. On January 6, 2006, Pearson acquired an additional 1,131,000 shares of the Company common stock from one of our former directors bringing the total held by Pearson to 57,555,000 or approximately 61% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2007. Interactive Data Corporation prior to the merger is referred to herein as Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, which continues to be the Company’s major institutional services business. The merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition. The shares of the Company held by Pearson Longman were subsequently transferred to Pearson DBC Holdings, Inc., another wholly owned subsidiary of Pearson Longman. Accordingly, the historical financial statements of Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data are the historical financial statements of the Company. Assets acquired totaled $565,373,000 and included cash, goodwill, an investment in MarketWatch, Inc. and intangible assets. Liabilities acquired totaled $127,079,000 and included accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred tax liabilities. Intangible assets are being amortized over periods ranging from two to eleven years. Accrued acquisition costs include severance, relocation and lease termination costs. As of December 31, 2007, accrued acquisition costs remaining were $51,000. An additional $3,000,000 of acquisition costs were funded by Pearson and treated as additional goodwill and a capital contribution. Acquisition of Xcitek On May 1, 2007, Interactive Data acquired the net assets comprising the market data division of Xcitek LLC (“Xcitek”), as well as the market data net assets of its affiliate Xcitax LLC (“Xcitax”), for $25,123,000. This acquisition was funded from operating cash. In addition, we accrued estimated transaction and acquisition costs of $1,840,000, consisting of legal services, accounting services, severance and lease termination costs. As of December 31, 2007, $1,260,000 of these accrued costs remain unpaid. We expect the majority of the remaining costs to be paid by June 30, 2008. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”). The purchase price has been assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The intangible assets are being amortized over periods ranging from two to eleven years. The weighted average amortization period in total is 10.6 years. The weighted average amortization period by major asset class is: customer list 11.0 years; securities database 8.0 years and trademark 2.0 years. In connection with the acquisition, we recorded $12,093,000 of goodwill, which has been allocated to our Institutional Services segment. Of that total amount, $11,006,000 is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Given the potential for future adjustments to the accrued acquisition costs, the purchase price allocation is preliminary. Our financial statements include the results of operations of Xcitek and Xcitax subsequent to the acquisition date. Xcitek’s market data business provides a broad range of North American corporate actions data, including reorganization information, as well as cost basis and class action data. This business has been integrated into our Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data business.
55
Table of ContentsThe acquisition was accounted for as follows (in thousands):
Acquisition of Quote.com On March 6, 2006, the Company acquired the net assets of Quote.com and other related assets from Lycos, Inc. The acquired assets comprise four distinct offerings that deliver financial content and trading tools primarily to active traders and individual investors. These include the subscription-based QCharts and LiveCharts services that provide real-time streaming data and access to decision-support tools to help active traders formulate investment strategies, as well as Quote.com, a financial news and analysis website, and Raging Bull, an online investment community and message board site. The Company is currently integrating the Quote.com business into its eSignal business. The aggregate cash consideration paid for the net assets was $30,000,000 and was funded from the operating cash of the Company. In addition, the Company accrued acquisition costs of $350,000, consisting primarily of legal and accounting services. As of December 31, 2007, all acquisition costs accrued have been paid. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS 141. The purchase price has been assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The intangible assets are being amortized over a period ranging from three months to ten years. The weighted average amortization period in total is 6.7 years. The weighted average amortization period by major asset class is: customer lists 5.9 years, completed software/technology 7.2 years, and trademarks 8.0 years. In connection with the acquisition, we recorded $22,530,000 of goodwill, which has been allocated to our Active Trader segment. Of that total amount, tax deductible goodwill resulting from the Quote.com acquisition is $22,500,000. The Company’s financial statements include the results of operations of the Quote.com business subsequent to the acquisition date. The acquisition was accounted for as follows (in thousands):
56
Table of ContentsAcquisition of IS.Teledata AG On December 13, 2005, Interactive Data acquired 95.1% of Germany-based IS.Teledata AG and its subsidiaries, or IS.Teledata, for $54,628,000, offset by cash acquired of $5,212,000. This acquisition was funded from the operating cash of the Company. During 2006, the Company acquired the remaining 4.9% of IS.Teledata for $2,914,000 which increased the price paid for IS.Teledata to $57,542,000 and increased the Company’s total ownership in IS.Teledata to 100.0%. In addition, the Company accrued estimated transaction and acquisition costs of $1,500,000, consisting of legal and accounting services. As of December 31, 2007, all of these costs have been paid. In the first quarter of 2006, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability of $13,600,000 associated with the intangible assets. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS 141. The purchase price has been assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The intangible assets are being amortized over periods ranging from eight to ten years. The weighted average amortization period in total is 9.8 years. The weighted average amortization period by major asset class is: customer lists 10.0 years and computer software/technology 9.6 years. The Company’s financial statements include the results of operations of IS.Teledata subsequent to the acquisition date. In connection with the acquisition, we recorded $17,734,000 of goodwill, which has been allocated to our Institutional Services segment, of which, none is tax deductible. This acquisition enabled the Company to enter an adjacent market sector with a set of offerings that complement its core portfolio of market data services. This acquisition also enabled the Company to broaden its presence in continental Europe. Following the acquisition, the Company established the Interactive Data Managed Solutions business whose offerings are based on the technology and capabilities developed at IS.Teledata and IS.Teledata AG was renamed Interactive Data Managed Solutions AG. The Interactive Data Managed Solutions business builds and manages customized financial information systems for a range of organizations worldwide, from retail and investment banks to online brokers, stock exchanges and media portals. The acquisition was accounted for as follows (in thousands):
57
Table of Contents4. Property and Equipment Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:
In 2007, the Company capitalized $9,448,000 related to the development of internal use software and recorded related depreciation expense of $2,436,000, $3,255,000 and $2,895,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The remaining book value of the software developed for internal use was $23,577,000 and $18,462,000 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Total depreciation expense was $23,110,000, $21,925,000 and $18,767,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. 5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands, except weighted average amortization period):
The estimated amortization expense of intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):
58
Table of ContentsThe changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 by reportable segment are as follows (in thousands):
The Company has reclassified the above information for 2006 and 2005 to disclose the components of goodwill by reportable segment.
6. Accrued Liabilities Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31:
7. Stock Based Compensation Stock-based Compensation Plans: Employee Stock Option Plan In 2000, we adopted our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2000 LTIP”). Under the 2000 LTIP, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors can grant stock-based awards representing in the aggregate up to 20% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding at the date of grant. As originally approved by stockholders, the 2000 LTIP had no termination date. On February 24, 2004, the 2000 LTIP was amended to include a termination date of
59
Table of ContentsFebruary 22, 2010. The 2000 LTIP provides for the discretionary issuance of stock-based awards to directors, officers, and employees, as well as persons who provide consulting or other services to us. Except with regard to eligible directors and officers required to file reports under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 16 Officers”), the exercise price of options granted to eligible participants is determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Our Board of Directors determines the exercise price of options granted to eligible directors. The Compensation Subcommittee, a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors, determines the exercise price of options granted to Section 16 Officers and certain other members of senior management. The exercise price for all options granted to date has been equal to the market price of the underlying common shares at the date of grant. Options expire ten years from the date of grant and generally vest over a four-year period. Restricted Stock and Deferred Stock Units We have awarded restricted and deferred stock units to certain key employees, executive officers and members of the board of directors under the 2000 LTIP. Each of these units represents the contingent right to receive one share of our common stock. An aggregate of 674,038 deferred and restricted stock units have been granted as of December 31, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable grant certificates, the underlying shares of common stock are available for distribution, at no cost, to grantees at the end of a three-year vesting period. We charge the cost of the awards, which we determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of the grant, to compensation expense on a straight-line basis, ratably, over the vesting periods. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we issued a total of 58,759 shares of common stock in connection with the settlement of deferred stock units. Employee Stock Purchase Plan In 2001, we adopted our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for all eligible employees worldwide (the “2001 ESPP”). The 2001 ESPP allows our employees to purchase stock at a 15% discount price at specific times. During the year ended December 31, 2007, our employees purchased an aggregate of 186,343 shares at an average share price of $17.77. At December 31, 2007, 1,137,769 shares were reserved for future issuance under the 2001 ESPP. Shares of common stock that are issued in respect of the exercise of options or other equity awards granted under the 2000 LTIP and 2001 ESPP are issued from authorized, but unissued common stock. Stock-based Compensation Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”) and related interpretations, which requires us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity awards based on the fair value of the award as of the grant date. SFAS 123(R) supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123”), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issues to Employees (“APB 25”). We adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective application transition method of adoption which required us to record compensation cost related to unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2005 by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over their remaining requisite service periods. We will continue to recognize the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards on a straight-line basis. With respect to awards granted after December 31, 2005, we have recorded compensation cost based on the grant date fair value and recognized the fair value on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of each award. Given we have elected the modified prospective application transition method of adoption we have not restated any of our historical reported interim or annual earnings reports. Prior to January 1, 2006, we measured stock-based compensation expense using the intrinsic value method of accounting as prescribed in APB No. 25 and related interpretations, in accounting for our employee stock option and employee stock purchase plan. Under this method, we did not recognize compensation expense on stock options granted to employees when the exercise price of each option was equal to or greater than the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant. We disclosed in periods prior to January 1, 2006, the pro forma effects on net earnings and earnings per share as if compensation cost had been recognized based upon the fair value-based method at the date of grant for employee stock awards and our employee stock purchase plan consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) is based on the value of the portion of stock-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Accordingly, stock-based compensation expense recognized in the statement of income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 reflects estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
60
Table of Contentsfrom those estimates. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our historical forfeitures of stock options. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we recorded forfeitures as they occurred for purposes of pro forma compensation expense under the provisions of SFAS 123. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recognized stock-based compensation expense under SFAS 123(R) as follows (in thousands):
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, our pre-tax stock-based compensation expense included $2,680,000 and $2,359,000, respectively, related to deferred and restricted stock units that were granted prior to and subsequent to our adoption of SFAS 123(R) and would have also been recognized as expense under APB 25. SFAS 123(R) requires cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits to be classified as a part of cash flows from financing activities. Excess tax benefits are realized tax benefits from tax deductions for exercised options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation costs for such options. As a result, $4,171,000 and $1,640,000 of excess tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively have been classified as a financing cash inflow (and corresponding operating cash outflow). Pro Forma Information for Periods Prior to Adoption of SFAS 123(R) The following pro forma information presents the Company’s net income as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards:
Valuation Assumptions The estimated fair value of the options granted during 2007 and in prior years was calculated using a Black-Scholes Merton option-pricing model (“Black-Scholes model”). The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield currently available on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury issues, in effect at the time of the grant, whose remaining maturity period equals the stock award’s expected term assumption. Expected volatility of our common stock is based on the historical volatility of our stock price over the expected term of the option. Our expected term is based on an analysis of historical exercise behavior and post-vest termination data. In February 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend. Therefore, commencing with grants awarded in the first quarter of 2007, we began using an expected dividend yield assumption in our Black-Scholes model for the purpose of calculating the fair value of grants. The expected dividend yield reflects our historical dividend yield, excluding special dividends, and is calculated by annualizing the quarterly cash dividends declared by our
61
Table of ContentsBoard of Directors divided by the closing price of our common stock on the declaration date of each dividend. The actual declaration of future dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates are subject to final determination by our Board of Directors. The fair value of stock options granted under the 2000 LTIP was estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $6.60, $6.57 and $5.56, respectively. The fair value of stock issued under the 2001 ESPP was estimated as of the beginning date of the offering period using a Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:
The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock issued under the 2001 ESPP for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $4.76, $3.98, and $3.68, respectively. Stock-based Award Activity A summary of the status and activity for stock option awards under our 2000 LTIP for the year ended December 31, 2007, is presented below:
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between our closing common stock price on the last trading day of the fourth quarter of 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options) that would have been received by the stock option holders had all stock option holders exercised their stock options on December 31, 2007. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of our common stock.
62
Table of ContentsThe aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $25,326,000, $11,715,000 and $14,255,000, respectively, determined as of the date of exercise. Exercise of options and issuances of shares under the 2000 LTIP and 2001 ESPP during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 resulted in cash receipts of $31,413,000, $19,027,000, and $19,574,000, respectively. We recognized a tax benefit of $9,224,000 and $4,196,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to the exercise of stock options and issuance of ESPP shares, which has been recorded as an increase to additional paid-in-capital. A summary of the status and activity for restricted and deferred stock units under our 2000 LTIP for the year ended December 31, 2007, is presented below:
A summary of the unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures and the weighted average period remaining at December 31, 2007 related to our non-vested employee stock purchase plan, stock option and deferred and restricted stock unit awards is presented below:
The total fair value of all share awards vested during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $13,021,000, $15,199,000 and $17,607,000, respectively. 8. Stockholders’ Equity In addition to our common stock, we are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 preferred shares, $0.01 par value per share, with terms determined by our Board of Directors, without any further action by our stockholders. At December 31, 2007, no preferred shares have been issued. In October 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of our outstanding shares of common stock. On December 11, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized an additional 2,000,000 shares under the stock buyback program. In the fourth quarter of 2007, we repurchased 140,200 shares of outstanding common stock under the stock buyback program. As of December 31, 2007, 2,770,900 shares remained available for purchase under the stock buyback program. In fiscal year 2007, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
63
Table of Contents
All of the above cash dividends have been paid or will be paid from our existing cash resources. The actual declaration of future dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates, is subject to final determination of the Board of Directors of the Company. 9. Commitments and Contingencies The Company has obligations under non-cancelable operating leases for real estate and equipment. In addition, the Company has purchase obligations for data content. Certain of the leases include renewal options and escalation clauses. Real estate leases are for the Company’s corporate headquarters, sales offices, major operating units and data centers. Future contractual commitments and obligations, as of December 31, 2007, are summarized in the chart below.
The Company’s key operating locations operate in facilities under long-term leases, the earliest of which will expire in 2008. Rental expense was $19,205,000, $17,433,000 and $12,652,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition to the amounts shown in the table above, $18,708,000 of unrecognized tax benefits have been recorded in income taxes payable in accordance with FIN 48, as we are uncertain if or when such amounts may be settled. Related to these unrecognized tax benefits, we have also recorded in income taxes payable $1,825,000 for potential interest and penalties at December 31, 2007. The Company is involved in litigation and is the subject of claims made from time to time in the ordinary course of business with a portion of the defense and/or settlement costs in some such cases being covered by various commercial liability insurance policies. In addition, the Company’s third party data suppliers audit the Company from time to time in the ordinary course of business to determine if data the Company licenses for redistribution has been properly accounted for. In view of the Company’s financial condition and the accruals established for related matters, management does not believe that the ultimate liability, if any, related to these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In connection with the provision of services in the ordinary course of business, the Company often makes representations affirming, among other things, that its services do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others and agrees to indemnify customers against third-party claims for such infringement. The Company has not been required to make material payments under such provisions.
64
Table of Contents10. Income Taxes The components of income before income taxes are as follows for the years ended December 31:
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured by applying enacted tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such differences are expected to reverse. Income taxes are generally not provided on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries because these earnings are considered by the Company to be permanently reinvested.
65
Table of ContentsThe components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets / (liabilities) recognized in the financial statements are as follows at December 31 (in thousands):
The Company recorded a long-term deferred tax asset concurrently with the sale of MarketWatch, Inc. to Pearson in 2000, which resulted from deferral of the capital loss for tax purposes. In 2005, MarketWatch, Inc. was sold by Pearson to an unrelated third-party and the capital loss became available to offset capital gains. In 2007 a decrease of $23,000 was recorded to the deferred tax asset and the related valuation allowance due to a state tax rate change. Also in 2007 the Company recorded a decrease of $297,000 to the deferred tax asset and the related valuation allowance due to the carryback of capital losses to prior years’ federal tax returns. There is uncertainty surrounding the Company’s ability to realize sufficient capital gains within the 5 year carryforward period in order to utilize the remaining $5,597,000 of deferred tax asset, and as such a full valuation allowance has been established. Should the Company determine that it is able to realize future capital gains for which this capital loss carryforward would be available to offset, an adjustment to this valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination is made. The Company has a long-term deferred tax asset of $6,209,000 for various net operating loss carryforwards against which a full valuation allowance has been provided since the utilization of the carryforward is dependent upon various federal, foreign and state tax limitations. In 2007 the Company recorded a deferred tax asset and full valuation allowance for $529,000 related to net operating losses at Interactive Data Managed Solutions AG due to the uncertainty surrounding the ability to utilize the net operating losses in future periods. Additionally, in 2007 a decrease of $22,000 was recorded to the deferred tax asset and the related valuation allowance due to a state tax rate change related to the deferred tax asset for net operating loss carryforwards that were obtained in the acquisition of Data Broadcasting Corporation that were set to expire in 2007.
66
Table of ContentsIncome taxes computed using the federal statutory income tax rates differ from the Company’s effective tax rate primarily due to the following:
In the first quarter of 2007 a discrete benefit was recorded related to (i) the release of state tax reserves of $161,000 which was the result of concluding a state audit, (ii) a $297,000 tax benefit from a Capital Loss Carryback to prior years, and (iii) realized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense of $96,000. In the second quarter the net discrete benefit amount is related to (i) interest expense charge on tax reserves for uncertain tax positions of $245,000, formerly reported as part of the effective tax rate, offset by (ii) $173,000 of realized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense, and (iii) a discrete benefit of $88,000 resulting from a reduction to the net deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2007, as a result of state tax rate reduction enacted in the second quarter. In the third quarter we released tax reserves of $1,064,000 and interest associated with these tax reserves of $193,000 that were no longer required as a result of the expiration of a statute of limitation. We filed our 2006 federal tax return in the third quarter and recorded a benefit of $1,479,000 principally related to (i) an $866,200 net tax benefit related to the Research and Development Credit and (ii) $196,900 tax benefit for the Domestic Production Activities Deduction. We also realized tax benefits related to (i) stock-based compensation expense of $73,000 and (ii) a discrete benefit of $2,535,000 related to a German tax rate reduction enacted in the third quarter that is effective in 2008. The interest expense charge on tax reserves for uncertain tax positions was $47,000 during the quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2007 we recorded a net discrete benefit of $375,000 related to (i) interest expense charge on tax reserves for uncertain tax positions of $17,000, (ii) a discrete tax charge of $438,000 related to a UK tax rate reduction enacted in 2007 that is effective in 2008, offset by (iii) $66,000 of realized tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense, and (iv) we filed our 2006 state tax returns in the fourth quarter and recorded a benefit of $764,000 principally related to a net tax benefit for the Research and Development Credit at the state level. The Company currently provides U.S. income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries to the extent these earnings are currently taxable or expected to be remitted. U.S. taxes have not been provided on approximately $120,000,000 of accumulated unremitted earnings, which are expected to remain permanently invested in the foreign operations. Quantification of the deferred tax liability, if any, associated with indefinitely reinvested earnings is not practicable. Unrecognized Tax Benefits On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”). As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, the Company had approximately $9,177,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $8,518,000 would impact the effective tax rate if recognized and $659,000 would result in an increase to goodwill. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $15,983,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $15,324,000 would impact the effective tax rate if recognized and $659,000 would result in an increase to goodwill. While it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months, the Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on the results of operations or the financial position of the Company. The Company has classified the non-current unrecognized tax benefits of $7,667,000 to non-current income taxes payable on the balance sheet at December 31, 2007. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of the date of adoption, the Company had accrued interest of approximately $1,533,000 related to unrecognized tax benefits. At December 31, 2007 we had a balance of $1,825,000 related to unrecognized tax benefits.
67
Table of ContentsIn the 2007, the Company released $1,064,000 in unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions for various tax jurisdictions due to lapsing of statute of limitations and settled various state audits. Additionally, the Company reclassified taxes payable to unrecognized tax benefits related to prior years and 2007, of $3,604,000 and $2,353,000 respectively, for unrecognized tax benefits in the United Kingdom. The Company files federal, state and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. Generally, the 2004 through 2007 tax years remain subject to examination for federal, 2002 through 2007 for significant states and 2005 through 2007 for foreign tax authorities. The following table summarizes our 2007 activity for Unrecognized Tax Benefits, pursuant to the provisions FIN 48 (in thousands):
11. Retirement Plans Pearson, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan The Company’s US employees are eligible to participate in a Pearson subsidiary’s US 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan allows all employees to make contributions of a specified percentage of their compensation. The Company matches up to 4.5% of the employee’s contributions if the employee contributes at least 6% of his or her eligible pay, subject to statutory limits. The 401(k) Plan additionally allows certain employees to contribute amounts above the specified percentage, which are not subject to any employer match. In addition, certain employees of the Company participate in the Pearson 401(k) Excess Plan. This plan allows those employees to set aside a portion of their compensation above the statutory limits. The employer contribution portion for this plan is the same as the Pearson 401(k) plan. Contributions made by the Company for the 401(k) Plans are determined as a percentage of covered salary and amounted to $5,767,000, $5,045,000 and $4,600,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In 2002, the Company introduced an additional discretionary 401(k) contribution. This contribution is expected to be equivalent to 1.25% of eligible employee compensation. For this benefit for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company contributed $1,765,000, $1,640,000 and, $1,515,000, respectively. The related contributions for 2006 and 2005 have been made. The contribution for 2007 is expected to be made by April 2008. Pearson, Inc. Pension Plan Pearson Inc., a Pearson US subsidiary, sponsors a defined benefit plan (the “Pension Plan”) for Pearson’s US employees and the Pension Plan also includes certain of the Company’s US employees. Pension costs are actuarially determined. The Company funds pension costs attributable to its employees to the extent allowable under IRS regulations. In 2001, the Company froze the benefits associated with this Pension Plan and no gain or loss was recorded as a result of the curtailment. In 2002, the valuation date for the Pension Plan was changed from September to December. There was no material impact to the financial results of the Company as a result of this change. On December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS 158 required the Company to recognize the funded status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of its benefit plans in the December 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income. The initial impact of the standard due to unrecognized net actuarial gain and losses is recognized as a component of accumulated comprehensive loss. Additional minimum pension liabilities were also derecognized upon adoption of the standard. The adoption of SFAS 158 resulted in a net adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income of $759,000.
68
Table of ContentsPresented below is certain financial information relating to the Company’s participation in the Pension Plan: Obligations and Funded Status:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
