Jo-Ann Stores 10-K 2010
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
For the fiscal year-ended January 30, 2010
Commission File No. 1-6695
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 1, 2009 was $570.6 million, based upon the closing sales price of the registrants common stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. All executive officers and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be affiliates of the registrant.
The number of the registrants Common Shares outstanding, as of April 1, 2010, was 27,311,007.
Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference:
Proxy Statement for 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III.
Except as otherwise stated, the information contained in this report is given as of January 30, 2010, the end of our latest fiscal year. The words Jo-Ann Stores, Inc., Jo-Ann Stores, Jo-Ann Fabrics and Crafts, Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores, Joann.com, Registrant, company, we, our and us refer to Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. and, unless the context requires otherwise, to our subsidiaries. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. is an Ohio corporation, founded in 1943. Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31 and refers to the year in which the period ends (e.g., fiscal 2010 refers to the period ended January 30, 2010). Fiscal years consist of 52 weeks, unless noted otherwise.
We are the nations largest specialty retailer of fabrics and one of the largest specialty retailers of crafts, serving customers in their pursuit of apparel and craft sewing, crafting, home decorating and other creative endeavors. Our retail stores (operating as Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft stores and Jo-Ann stores) and website (www.Joann.com) feature a variety of competitively priced merchandise used in sewing, crafting and home decorating projects, including fabrics, notions, crafts, frames, paper crafting material, artificial floral, home accents, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise.
We consider stores that generally average more than approximately 24,000 square feet of retail space as large-format stores. Our small-format stores generally average less than approximately 24,000 square feet. The size of the store is not the only factor in determining its classification as large-format or small-format. The most important distinction for determining the classification of a large-format store is whether or not stores in the range have been recently built or remodeled and contain a broad assortment of craft categories.
As of January 30, 2010, we operated 746 stores in 48 states (518 small-format stores and 228 large-format stores). Our small-format stores offer a complete selection of fabric and a convenience assortment of crafts, artificial floral, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise. They average approximately 14,700 square feet and generated average net sales per store of approximately $1.7 million in fiscal 2010. We opened five small-format stores in fiscal 2010. Our large-format stores offer an expanded and more comprehensive product assortment than our small-format stores. Our large-format stores also generally offer custom framing and educational programs that our small-format stores do not. They average approximately 36,500 square feet and generated average net sales per store of approximately $4.7 million in fiscal 2010. We opened 15 large-format stores in fiscal 2010.
We provide a one-stop shopping experience for craft and sewing projects under one roof, with employees who are encouraged to advise customers in creating and completing creative projects. Many of our store level employees are sewing and/or crafting enthusiasts, which we believe enables them to provide exceptional customer service. We believe our focus on service contributes to a high proportion of repeat business from our customers.
We believe that our large-format stores are uniquely designed to offer a destination location for our customers. We offer approximately 70,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs) across two broad product categories: sewing and non-sewing merchandise. We manage our vast product selection with SAP Retail systems. Through the core SAP application and integration with peripheral processing systems, we continue to drive operational improvements and streamline operations. During fiscal 2010, we completed an implementation of the JDA Demand & Fulfillment system, enhancing our merchandise management portfolio of merchandise planning, space planning and product replenishment.
Our industry is highly fragmented and is served by multi-store fabric retailers, arts and crafts retailers, mass merchandisers, small local specialty retailers, mail order and Internet vendors and a variety of other retailers. The Craft & Hobby Association estimates that the craft and hobby industry sales in the United States are approximately $30 billion annually.
We believe stability in our sales and our industry is partially a function of recession-resistant characteristics. For example, according to a 2009 study conducted by the Craft & Hobby Association, approximately 56 percent of all U.S. households participated in crafts and hobbies, flat compared to the prior year. While
expenditures for such projects are generally discretionary in nature, our average sales ticket during fiscal 2010 was $23 in our large-format stores and $19 in our small-format stores.
The following core objectives serve as the foundation of our operational and merchandising initiatives:
We have completed the following operational and merchandising initiatives, which were developed from our core objectives:
Our current operating priorities also stem from the above objectives:
During fiscal 2011, we expect further improvements in margin due to continued expansion of direct sourcing of product from overseas and the realization of benefits from operating for a full year on the JDA Demand & Fulfillment system.
The following table shows our net sales by principal product line as a percentage of total net sales:
We offer a broad and comprehensive assortment of fabrics and sewing accessories in both our small-format and large-format stores. These fabrics are merchandised by end use and are sourced from throughout the world to offer our customers a combination of unique design, fashion forward trends and value. Our stores are organized in the following categories for the convenience of the sewer:
We offer a broad assortment of non-sewing merchandise for the creative enthusiast. Our large-format stores offer the complete array of categories while our small-format stores, due to their smaller size, carry edited assortments of the best-selling items. We offer the following non-sewing selections in our large-format stores:
In addition to the basic categories described above, our stores regularly feature seasonal products, which fit with our core merchandising strategy. Our seasonal offerings span all product lines and include finished decorations, gifts and accessories that focus on holidays, as well as seasonal categories such as patio/garden.
During the Christmas selling season, a significant portion of floor and shelf space is devoted to seasonal crafts, decorating and gift-making merchandise. Due to the project-oriented nature of these items, our peak selling season starts earlier than that of other retailers and generally runs from September through December. In fiscal 2010, approximately 56 percent of our net sales occurred in the third and fourth quarters, and approximately 30 percent occurred in the fourth quarter alone.
During fiscal 2010, sewing and non-sewing net sales represented 44 percent and 56 percent of total net sales for our large-format stores, respectively. Sewing and non-sewing net sales represented 62 percent and 38 percent of total net sales for our small-format stores for the same period, respectively.
Our marketing efforts are key to the ongoing success and growth of our sales. Our primary focus is on acquiring and retaining customers through an integrated direct and mass marketing program.
We use our proprietary customer database to provide ongoing communication to our best customers through a robust direct mail and e-mail program. This allows us to efficiently and effectively reach our target market on a regular basis throughout the year. To drive customer acquisition, we supplement our direct mail advertising with weekly newspaper insert advertising, primarily in large-format store markets. Our direct mail and newspaper inserts showcase our sales events, feature numerous products offered at competitive prices, and provide inspiration by showcasing customers interacting with our products.
As we market the Jo-Ann Stores concept, we also focus on developing long-term relationships with our customers. These efforts include providing inspiration and building knowledge through in-store classes, demonstrations and projects.
Our grand opening program plays an integral role in the successful opening of each new store. We utilize our existing customer base to build awareness and excitement in each market around the opening of each new store. This is paired with newspaper inserts, in-store promotions and public relations efforts during the grand opening weekend to drive customer traffic. We continue to drive customer awareness and traffic following grand openings through ongoing advertising efforts in the market.
We also reach our customers through our Joann.com e-commerce business. The website was upgraded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, resulting in significantly improved site stability and performance. As part of the upgrade initiative, the site was redesigned and re-launched with improved navigation, a more visually compelling design, and increased emphasis on inspiration through lifestyle imagery used to promote how products might be used.
The Jo-Ann online community was also upgraded and re-launched. The upgrade, which took place in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, addressed capacity issues, updated platform software and brought the look, feel and branding of the community into alignment with the e-commerce site. Like the e-commerce sites re-launch, this community upgrade improved stability and performance for its community members, which grew from 40,000 members at the end of fiscal 2009 (having expanded from approximately 11,500 at the beginning of fiscal 2009) to just over 66,000 members by the closing of fiscal 2010.
Social networking is playing an increasingly significant role in marketing, public relations and customer relations for Jo-Ann. Facebook, which was originally utilized as an engagement tool to share inspiration, promote sales, and introduce new products, demonstrated added value during fiscal 2010 as a vehicle for responding to customers when traditional customer service relation channels were experiencing high volume. Facebook fans grew from just under 800 at the start of fiscal 2010 to nearly 15,000 fans by year-end.
We have numerous domestic and international sources of supply available for each category of product that we sell. During fiscal 2010, approximately 77 percent of our purchases were sourced domestically and 23 percent were sourced internationally. As a percent of purchases, our international sourcing decreased three percent from 26 percent in fiscal 2009, primarily due to our planned reduction in seasonal and fashion
purchases during fiscal 2010. However, we continue to increase the amount of products we buy directly from factories in Asia, rather than purchasing through domestic agents and/or trading companies. Our domestic suppliers source internationally some of the products they sell to us. Although we have very few long-term purchase commitments with any of our suppliers, we strive to maintain continuity with them. All purchases are centralized through our store support center, allowing store team leaders and store team members to focus on customer sales and service and enabling us to negotiate volume discounts, control product mix and ensure quality. Currently, our top supplier represents approximately three percent of our annual purchase volume and the top ten suppliers represent approximately 23 percent of our total annual purchase volume. We currently utilize approximately 605 merchandise suppliers, with the top 123 representing more than 80 percent of our purchasing volume.
We operate three distribution centers in Hudson, Ohio, Visalia, California and Opelika, Alabama, all of which ship merchandise to our stores on a weekly basis. Based on purchase dollars, approximately 77 percent of the products in our stores are shipped through our distribution center network, with the remaining 23 percent of our purchases shipped directly from our suppliers to our stores. Approximately 45 percent of our store base is supplied from the Hudson distribution center, 28 percent from our Visalia distribution center and 27 percent from our Opelika distribution center.
We transport product from our distribution centers to our stores utilizing contract carriers. Merchandise is shipped directly from our distribution centers to our stores using dedicated core carriers for approximately 95 percent of our store base. For the remainder of our chain, we transport product to the stores using less than truckload carriers or through a regional hub where product is cross-docked for local delivery. We do not own either the regional hub or the local delivery vehicles.
Site Selection. We believe that our store locations are integral to our success. New sites are selected through a coordinated effort of our real estate, finance and operations management teams. In evaluating the desirability of a potential store site, we consider both market demographics and site-specific criteria. Market criteria that we consider important include, but are not limited to, our existing store sales performance in that immediate market, distance to other Jo-Ann store locations, as well as total population, number of households, median household income, percentage of home ownership versus rental, and historical and projected population growth over a ten-year period. Site-specific criteria that we consider important include, but are not limited to, rental terms, the store location, position and visibility within the shopping center, size of the shopping center, co-tenants, proximity to highway access, traffic patterns, availability of convenient parking and ease of entry from the major roadways framing the location.
Costs of Opening Stores. Standard operating procedures are employed to efficiently open new stores and integrate them into our information management and distribution systems. We have developed a standardized floor plan, inventory layout and marketing program for each store that we open. We typically open stores during the period from February through October to maximize sales and to minimize disruption to store operations during our fourth-quarter peak selling season.
Store Management. Small-format stores generally have five full-time team members and 10 to 15 part-time team members, while large-format stores typically have approximately nine full-time team members and 35 to 40 part-time team members. Store team leaders generally are compensated with a base salary plus a bonus, which is tied to quarterly store sales and annual store controllable profit.
Our store team leaders typically are promoted from within our assistant manager ranks as a result of their high performance and completion of our internal management training program. Some of our store team leaders started as our customers. This continuity serves to solidify long-standing relationships between our stores and our customers. When a smaller store is closed due to a new larger store opened in the market, we generally retain its team members to staff the new store. Each store is under the supervision of a district team leader who reports to a regional vice president.
The following table shows our stores by type and state on January 30, 2010:
The following table reflects the number of stores opened, expanded or downsized and closed during each of the past five fiscal years (square footage in thousands):
Our new store opening costs depend on the building type, store size and general cost levels in the geographical area. During fiscal 2010, we opened 15 large-format stores with an average size of approximately 27,900 square feet. Our average net investment in a large-format store is approximately $1.2 million, which includes leasehold improvements, net of landlord allowances, furniture, fixtures and equipment, inventory (net of payable support) and pre-opening expenses. Five small-format stores were opened in fiscal 2010 with an average size of approximately 19,500 square feet. Our average net investment in a small-format store is
approximately $0.8 million, which includes leasehold improvements, net of landlord allowances, furniture, fixtures and equipment, inventory (net of payable support) and pre-opening expenses.
During fiscal 2011, we expect to open approximately 30 new stores and close approximately 30 stores. We also plan to remodel at least 40 stores. As we accelerate our new store growth, we will focus on a smaller prototype store. The average size of our standard prototype will be approximately 22,000 square feet, with a small market or urban prototype of approximately 15,000 square feet. During fiscal 2011, the 30 new stores we expect to open will average 20,500 square feet, with 13 of the stores under 20,000 square feet.
Our point-of-sale registers and scanning devices record the sale of product at a SKU level at our stores. Those transactions are collected and transmitted to our host systems throughout the day and interface with both our financial and merchandising systems on a nightly basis. Information obtained from item-level scanning through our point-of-sale system enables us to identify important trends, increase in-stock levels of more popular SKUs, eliminate less profitable SKUs, analyze product margins and generate data for the purpose of evaluating our advertising and promotions.
We utilize handheld radio frequency devices for a variety of store tasks including price look-up, perpetual inventory exception counting, merchandise receiving, vendor returns and fabric sales processing. Our retail stores are equipped with broadband communication and central controllers, resulting in an enhanced customer checkout experience and a better platform to further automate internal store communications. Our in-store system allows us to provide better customer service by increasing the speed and accuracy of register checkout, enabling us to more rapidly restock merchandise and efficiently re-price sale items.
We operate our core financial, merchandise, human resource and retail processes on SAP Retail, complemented by point software solutions for key business processes. During fiscal 2010, we completed an implementation of the JDA Demand & Fulfillment system, enhancing our merchandise management portfolio of merchandise planning, space planning and product replenishment. We also completed a redesign and upgrade of our e-commerce technologies, improving stability and providing a platform for continued growth of our Joann.com business.
During fiscal 2010, there was no public announcement nor is there a public announcement anticipated about either a new product line or line of business involving the investment of a material portion of our assets.
We do business under trademarks for Jo-Ann®, Joann.com®, Jo-Ann ETC®, Jo-Ann Fabrics®, Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores®, Jo-Ann Fabrics & Crafts®, Jo-Ann Fabrics and Crafts®, and GoGreen Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores®, and we also own numerous trademarks relating to our private label products. We believe that our trademarks provide significant value to our business.
Our business exhibits seasonality that is typical for most retail companies, with much stronger sales in the second half of the year than in the first half of the year. Net earnings are highest during the months of September through December when sales volumes provide significant operating leverage. In fiscal 2010, approximately 56 percent of our net sales occurred in the third and fourth quarters, and approximately 30 percent occurred in the fourth quarter alone.
We are engaged in the retail sale of merchandise to the general public and, accordingly, no part of our business is dependent upon a single customer or a few customers. During fiscal 2010, no single store accounted for more than one percent of total net sales.
We sell merchandise to the general public on a cash and carry basis and, accordingly, we have no significant backlog of orders.
Various aspects of our operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations, any of which may change from time to time. We are impacted, in particular, by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, which includes new limitations on lead and phthalates and imposes product testing and certification requirements with respect to many of the products we sell.
We are the nations largest specialty retailer of fabrics and one of the largest specialty retailers of crafts, serving customers in their pursuit of apparel and craft sewing, crafting, home decorating and other creative endeavors. Our stores compete with other specialty fabric and craft retailers and selected mass merchants, including Wal-Mart, that dedicate a portion of their selling space to a limited selection of fabrics and craft supply items. In addition, alternative methods of selling fabrics and crafts, such as over the Internet, could result in additional competitors in the future and increased price competition since our customers could more readily comparison shop. We compete on the basis of product assortment, price, convenience and customer service. We believe that the combination of our product assortment under one roof, quality sales events and knowledgeable and customer focused team members provides us with a competitive advantage.
There are three companies that we primarily compete with nationally in the fabric and craft specialty retail industry, one in the fabric segment (Hancock Fabrics, Inc.), one in the craft segment (Michaels Stores, Inc.) and one in the craft segment that also carries fabrics (Hobby Lobby). There is also a regional operator, A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc., which competes in the craft segment. The balance of our competition is comprised of smaller regional and local operators. We believe that we have several advantages over most of our smaller competitors, including:
During the three fiscal years ended January 30, 2010, we have not incurred any material expense for research activities relating to the development of new products or services or the improvement of existing products or services.
We are not engaged in manufacturing. Accordingly, we do not believe that compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of material into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment will have a material adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, income or competitive position.
As of January 30, 2010, we had approximately 21,135 full and part-time employees, of whom 19,618 worked in our stores, 371 were employed in our Hudson, Ohio distribution center, 212 were employed in our Visalia, California distribution center, 182 were employed in our Opelika, Alabama distribution center and 752 were employed at our store support center in Hudson, Ohio. The number of part-time employees is substantially higher during our peak selling season. We believe our employee turnover is below average for retailers, primarily because our stores often are staffed with sewing and crafting enthusiasts. In addition, we provide an attractive work environment, employee discounts, flexible hours and competitive compensation packages within the local labor markets. Our ability to offer flexible scheduling is important in attracting and retaining these employees, since approximately 75 percent of our employees work part-time.
The United Steelworkers of America, Upholstery and Allied Industries Division currently represents employees who work in our Hudson, Ohio distribution center. Our current contract expires on May 5, 2011. We believe that our relationship with our employees and the union is good. Otherwise, none of our employees are unionized.
In fiscal 2010, we purchased approximately 23 percent of our products directly from manufacturers located in foreign countries. These foreign suppliers are located primarily in China and other Asian countries. In addition, many of our domestic suppliers purchase a portion of their products from foreign suppliers. Because a large percentage of our products are manufactured or sourced abroad, we are required to order these products further in advance than would be the case if the products were manufactured domestically. We do not have material long-term contracts with any manufacturers.
Other Available Information
We make available, free of charge, on our website at www.Joann.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as soon as we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We have posted on our website the charters of our Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (which also serves as the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Financial Officers), and will post any amendments or waivers thereto.
As required by Section 303A.12 of the Listed Company Manual of the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), our Chief Executive Officer submitted to the NYSE his annual certification on July 6, 2009 stating that he was not aware of any violation by our company of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, we have filed, as exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended January 30, 2010, the certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer required under Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Our business and financial performance is subject to various risks and uncertainties. In addition, we may, from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current views and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.
There are many factors that affect our business and financial performance, some of which are beyond our control. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this Report, the following risks and uncertainties could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and access to the capital markets. Other factors not presently known to us, or that we presently believe are not material, could also affect our business and financial performance. The risks discussed below could cause
our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and from results predicted by forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf related to conditions or events that we anticipate may occur in the future. All forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are qualified by the risks described below.
General economic factors may adversely affect our business, revenue and profitability
General economic conditions may adversely affect our financial performance. Consumer demand for the products that we sell could be adversely affected by higher interest rates, higher fuel and other energy costs, weakness in the housing market, inflation, deflation, recession, higher levels of unemployment, unavailability of consumer credit, higher consumer debt levels, consumer confidence in future economic conditions, weather, higher tax rates and other changes in tax laws, overall economic slowdown and other economic factors. Our sales generally represent discretionary spending by our customers and thus we may be more susceptible to factors negatively affecting consumer demand than other retailers selling less discretionary products. Lower consumer demand for our products would cause our revenues, and possibly our profitability, to decline, while a prolonged economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our cost structure, and thus our operations and operating results, could be negatively impacted by higher interest rates; higher fuel and other energy costs; higher transportation costs; higher costs of labor, insurance and healthcare; inflation in other costs; higher tax rates and other changes in the tax laws; changes in other laws and regulations; increased regulatory enforcement; increased litigation; and other economic factors. These factors affect not only our operations, but also the operations of suppliers from which we purchase goods and services, which may result in cost increases to us and a negative impact on our operations and operating results.
Natural disasters and geo-political events could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance
The occurrence of one or more natural disasters, such as fires, hurricanes, tornados and earthquakes, and geo-political events, such as civil unrest in a country in which our suppliers are located or terrorist or military activities disrupting transportation, communication or utility systems, could adversely affect our operations and financial performance. Such events could result in physical damage to or destruction or disruption of one or more of our properties (including our headquarters, distribution centers and stores), the lack of an adequate workforce in parts or all of our operations, supply chain disruptions, data and communications disruptions, the inability of our customers to shop in our stores and the inability to operate our e-commerce business. These factors could also cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and global financial markets and economy. Such occurrences could significantly impact our operating results and financial performance and result in increased volatility of the market price for our common shares.
We may not be able to achieve the expected benefits from the implementation of marketing initiatives
Our marketing initiatives designed to drive sales growth include marketing enhancements such as changes in the appearance, content and distribution of our advertising, new vendor programs and improved plan-o-gram processes. Our goal is to further enhance our customer shopping experience by modifying our marketing content to deliver a stronger value message, enhancing our industry-leading education and in-store demonstration programs and expanding the product offering and functionality of the Joann.com website.
We may not be able to successfully execute our marketing initiatives to realize the intended benefits and growth prospects. Certain risks such as increased competition and economic factors may limit our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and expand our business. Our efforts to drive sales growth may not bring the intended result. Assumptions underlying estimates of expected revenue growth or overall cost savings may not be met or economic conditions may deteriorate. Customer acceptance of our marketing initiatives may not be as anticipated.
Failure to timely respond to changes in consumer trends could negatively impact our business
The success of our business depends in part on our ability to identify and respond to evolving trends in demographics and consumer preferences. The long lead times associated with our foreign-sourced products exacerbate this challenge. Failure to identify and effectively respond to changing consumer tastes, preferences and spending patterns on a timely basis could negatively affect our relationship with our customers and the demand for our products. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
Competition could negatively impact our results
Competition is intense in the retail fabric and craft industry, with low entry barriers. We must remain competitive in the areas of quality, price, selection, customer service, convenience and reputation.
Our primary competition is comprised of specialty fabric retailers and specialty craft retailers such as Michaels Stores, Inc., a national chain that operates craft and framing stores, Hobby Lobby, a national chain that operates craft stores that also carries fabrics, Hancock Fabrics, Inc., a national chain that operates fabric stores, and A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc., a regional chain that operates craft stores in the eastern United States. We also compete with mass merchants, including Wal-Mart, that dedicate a portion of their selling space to a limited selection of fabrics, craft supplies and seasonal and holiday merchandise. Some of our competitors have stores nationwide, several operate regional chains and numerous others are local merchants. Some of our competitors, particularly the mass merchants, are larger and have greater financial resources than we do. The performance of competitors as well as changes in their pricing and promotional policies, marketing activities, new store openings, merchandising and operational strategies could impact our sales and profitability. Our sales and profitability could also be impacted by store liquidations of our competitors. In addition, alternative methods of selling fabrics and crafts, such as over the Internet, could result in additional competitors in the future and increased price competition since our customers could more readily comparison shop. Moreover, we ultimately compete against alternative sources of entertainment and leisure activities for our customers that are unrelated to the fabric and craft industry. This competition could negatively affect our sales and profitability.
Risks associated with our suppliers could adversely affect our operations and financial performance
Our business success is highly dependent on our ability to find qualified suppliers who can deliver products in a timely and efficient manner, and in compliance with our vendor standards and all applicable laws and regulations. Many of our suppliers are small companies with limited resources and lack of financial flexibility. Some of our suppliers are susceptible to cash flow issues, production difficulties, quality control issues and problems in delivering agreed-upon quantities on schedule and in compliance with regulatory requirements. We cannot assure that we would be able, if necessary, to return products to these suppliers and obtain refunds of our purchase price or obtain reimbursement or indemnification from them if their products prove defective, not in compliance with regulatory requirements or in violation of third-party intellectual property rights. In addition, many of these suppliers require extensive advance notice of our requirements in order to supply products in the quantities we desire. This long lead time requires us to place orders far in advance of the time when certain products will be offered for sale, exposing us to shifts in demand. In addition, some of our suppliers may be unable to withstand a downturn in economic conditions. The inability of key suppliers to access financing, or their insolvency, could lead to their failure to deliver merchandise or services. If we are unable to procure products and services when needed, our sales and cash flows could be negatively impacted in future periods. Significant failures on the part of our key suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
The significant product safety requirements arising under the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 and state product safety laws may represent a compliance challenge to some of our suppliers, could negatively impact the ability of such suppliers to deliver compliant products to us and thus negatively impact our business operations and performance. Delivery of non-compliant products could result in liability to our company; while we obtain indemnifications from our suppliers with respect to compliance issues, some suppliers might not have the financial resources to stand behind their indemnifications and we could also suffer damage to our reputation.
Our dependence on foreign suppliers subjects us to possible delays in receipt of merchandise and to the risks involved in foreign operations
We are heavily dependent on foreign suppliers. In fiscal 2010, we purchased approximately 23 percent of our products directly from manufacturers located in foreign countries (in particular, in China and other Asian countries). In addition, many of our domestic suppliers purchase a portion of their products from foreign suppliers.
Foreign sourcing subjects us to a number of risks, including long lead times; work stoppages; transportation delays and interruptions; product quality issues; employee rights issues; other social concerns; epidemics; political instability; economic disruptions; the imposition of tariffs, duties, quotas, import and export controls and other trade restrictions; changes in governmental policies; and other events. If any of these events occur, it could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, reductions in the value of the U.S. dollar or revaluation of the Chinese currency, or other foreign currencies, could ultimately increase the prices that we pay for our products. All of our products manufactured overseas and imported into the United States are subject to duties collected by the United States Customs Service. We may be subjected to additional duties, significant monetary penalties, the seizure and forfeiture of the products we are attempting to import or the loss of import privileges, if we or our suppliers are found to be in violation of U.S. laws and regulations applicable to the importation of our products.
Our business depends on shopping center traffic
Our stores generally are located in strip shopping centers and big box shopping centers. Our sales are dependent in part on a high volume of shopping center traffic. Shopping center traffic may be adversely affected by, among other things, economic downturns, rising fuel costs, gasoline shortages, the closing of anchor stores, shopping center occupancy rates and mix, new shopping centers and other retail developments, or changes in customer shopping preferences. A decline in the popularity of shopping center shopping among our target customers could have a material adverse effect on customer traffic and reduce our sales and net earnings.
The seasonality of our sales may negatively impact our operating results
Our business is seasonal, with a significant amount of sales and earnings occurring in the third, and in particular, the fourth fiscal quarters. Our inventory levels and related short-term financing needs also are seasonal, with the greatest requirements occurring during our third fiscal quarter as we increase our inventory in preparation for our peak selling season. Weak sales during the second half of the year will negatively impact our operating results and cash flow generation.
Disruption to the transportation system or increases in transportation costs may negatively impact our operating results
We rely upon various means of transportation, including shipments by air, sea, rail and truck, to deliver products to our distribution centers from vendors and from our distribution centers to our stores, as well as for direct shipments from vendors to stores. Labor shortages or capacity constraints in the transportation industry, disruptions to the national and international transportation infrastructure, fuel shortages, or transportation cost increases (such as increases in fuel costs or port fees) could adversely affect our business and operating results.
The failure to attract and retain qualified employees could limit our growth and negatively impact our operations
Our continued success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified management, administrative and store personnel. Our inability to do so may have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. Our success depends to a significant extent both upon the continued services of our current executive and senior management team, as well as our ability to attract, hire, motivate and retain additional qualified management in the future. Competition for key executives in the retail industry is intense, and our operations could be adversely affected if we cannot attract and retain qualified management.
Many of our employees are in entry level and part-time positions with historically high rates of turnover. Our ability to meet our labor needs while controlling our costs is subject to external factors such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, benefits costs, minimum wage legislation, changes in employment legislation and regulations, workers compensation costs and changing demographics. If we are unable to attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of quality employees at a reasonable cost, our operating results could be impacted adversely.
The United Steelworkers of America, Upholstery and Allied Industries Division currently represents employees who work in our Hudson, Ohio distribution center. Our current contract expires on May 5, 2011. We believe that our relations with our employees and the union are good, but if a strike were to occur it may adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
Failure to manage inventory effectively could negatively impact our operations
Due to the nature of our business, we purchase much of our inventory well in advance of each selling season. If we misjudge consumer preferences or demands, we could have excess inventory that may need to be held for a long period of time, written down, sold at prices lower than expected, or discarded in order to clear excess inventory at the end of a selling season. Conversely, if we underestimate consumer demand, we may not be able to provide products to our customers to meet their demand. Either event could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, inventory shrink (inventory theft or loss) rates can significantly impact our business performance and financial results. Failure to manage inventory shrink rates could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The loss of, or disruption in, or our inability to efficiently operate our distribution network could have a negative impact on our business
We operate three distribution centers to support our business. If complications arise with any one facility or any facility is severely damaged or destroyed, our other distribution centers may not be able to support the resulting additional distribution demands. This may adversely affect our ability to receive and deliver inventory on a timely basis.
The majority of our inventory is shipped directly from suppliers to our distribution centers where the inventory is then processed, sorted, picked and shipped to our stores. We rely in large part on the orderly operation of this receiving and distribution process, which depends on adherence to shipping schedules and effective management of our distribution network. Although we believe that our receiving and distribution process is efficient and well-positioned to support our operating and strategic plans, we cannot assure that we have anticipated all issues or that events beyond our control, such as disruptions in operations due to natural disasters or other catastrophic events, labor disagreements or shipping problems, will not result in delays in the delivery of merchandise to our stores. Such delays could negatively impact our business.
Disruptions to our information systems, or our failure to adequately support, maintain and upgrade these systems, could negatively impact our operations and financial results.
We depend on a variety of information systems for the efficient functioning of our business. In particular, we rely on our information systems to effectively process transactions, manage inventory, purchase, sell and ship goods on a timely basis and maintain cost-efficient operations. Disruptions to our information systems, or our failure to adequately support, maintain and upgrade these systems could have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial results.
While we have implemented a disaster recovery plan intended to minimize the effect of any disruption to our information systems, the failure of our information systems to perform as designed could disrupt our business and harm sales and profitability. Any material disruption or slowdown of our systems could cause information to be lost or delayed, which could have a negative impact on our business. We may experience operational problems with our information systems as a result of power outages, computer and telecommunication failures, other system failures, viruses, security breaches, natural disasters, terrorist and criminal activities, employee usage errors or other causes. If our computer systems are damaged or cease to function
properly, we may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may suffer interruptions in our operations in the interim.
In addition, costs and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or adequate support of existing systems could also disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. We also rely heavily on our information technology staff. If we cannot meet our staffing needs in this area, we may not be able to fulfill our technology or business initiatives while continuing to provide maintenance on existing systems. Our inability to fulfill these initiatives and to maintain the existing systems adequately could materially adversely affect our operations and financial results.
Financing needs could restrict our operations
Our business is dependent on the availability of credit to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements. We currently have in place a secured credit facility, which expires in September 2013. We believe that this financing is adequate to meet our foreseeable needs. If our financing needs were to increase, we might not be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all, which could have a material adverse affect on our business.
Failure to comply with the restrictions placed on us by our lenders could have a material adverse effect on our business
Our secured credit facility agreement contains restrictive and financial covenants, which limit our ability to borrow money, make investments, or make payments on our capital stock, incur liens and take other actions. We currently are in compliance with all of these covenants and do not foresee any issues in continuing to comply with these covenants in the future. However, our ability to remain in compliance with these covenants and tests may be affected by unanticipated events or events beyond our control. If we fail to meet these tests or breach any of the covenants, the lenders under the secured credit facility could declare all amounts outstanding under the facility, including accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable.
Failure to adequately maintain the security of our electronic and other confidential information could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
We are dependent upon automated information technology processes. As part of our normal business activities, we collect and store certain confidential information, including personal information with respect to customers and employees. We may share some of this information with vendors who assist us with certain aspects of our business. Moreover, the success of our e-commerce operations depends upon the secure transmission of confidential and personal data over public networks, including the use of cashless payments. Any failure on the part of us or our vendors to maintain the security of our confidential data and our employees and customers personal information, including via the penetration of our network security and the misappropriation of confidential and personal information, could result in business disruption, damage to our reputation, financial obligations to third parties, fines, penalties, regulatory proceedings and private litigation with potentially large costs, and also result in deterioration in our employees and customers confidence in us and other competitive disadvantages, and thus have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a security breach could require that we expend significant additional resources to enhance our information security systems and could result in a disruption to our operations.
We currently are certified as being in compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), but must be recertified on a regular basis with the next recertification scheduled in August 2010 for our stores and Joann.com. A company processing, storing, or transmitting payment card data must be PCI DSS compliant or risk losing its ability to process credit card payments and being audited and/or fined. Failure to maintain our PCI certification could result in our inability to accept credit card payments or subject us to penalties and thus could have a material negative effect on our operations.
Failure to comply with various regulations, or increased litigation, may result in damage to our business
Our policies and procedures are designed to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including those imposed by the SEC and NYSE. Additional legal and regulatory requirements such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have increased the complexity of the regulatory environment. Also, various aspects of our operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations, any of which may change from time to time. We are impacted, in particular, by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, which includes new limitations on lead and phthalates and imposes product testing and certification requirements with respect to many of the products we sell, and state product safety laws and regulations. Additionally, we are regularly involved in various litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including liability claims, employment-related claims, contractual disputes and allegations that we have infringed third-party intellectual property rights.
Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. Also, failure to comply with the various regulations may result in damage to our reputation, civil and criminal liability, fines and penalties, increased cost of regulatory compliance and restatements of financial statements.
We may not be able to successfully implement our store growth strategy
Our store growth strategy includes opening new stores in existing and new markets, replacing some of our small-format stores with large-format stores and remodeling some of our stores. We face significant competition from other retailers for suitable locations. We also may face difficulties in negotiating leases on acceptable terms. New store openings involve certain risks, including constructing, furnishing, supplying and staffing a store in a timely and cost effective manner and accurately assessing the demographic or retail environment for a particular location. Our future sales at new and remodeled stores may not meet our projections, which could adversely impact our return on investment. Our inability to execute our store growth strategy in a manner that generates appropriate returns on investment could have an adverse impact on our future growth and profitability.
Changes in accounting standards
A change in accounting standards or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results of operations. New accounting pronouncements and interpretations of existing accounting rules and practices have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules may adversely affect our reported financial results.
Effective tax rate
Our effective tax rate is derived from a combination of applicable tax rates in jurisdictions in which we operate. Our effective tax rate may be lower or higher than our tax rates have been in the past due to numerous factors including the sources of our income, any agreements we may have with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions, changes in tax laws and the tax filing positions we take in various jurisdictions. We base our estimate of an effective tax rate at any given point in time upon a calculated mix of the tax rates applicable to our company and to estimates of the amount of business likely to be done in any given jurisdiction. The loss of one or more agreements with taxing jurisdictions, a change in the mix of our business, changes in rules related to accounting for income taxes, changes in tax laws in any of the taxing jurisdictions, or adverse outcomes from tax audits could result in an unfavorable change in our effective tax rate, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Inadequacy of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our company
We maintain third party insurance coverage against various liability risks and risks of property loss, as well directors and officers liability insurance coverage. While we believe these arrangements are an effective way to insure against liability and property damage risks, the potential liabilities associated with those risks or other events could exceed the coverage provided by such arrangements. Significant uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our company.
Cash and cash equivalents held at financial institutions exceed federally insured limits
We have a significant amount of cash and cash equivalents (money market funds) at financial institutions that are in excess of federally insured limits. With the current financial environment and the instability of financial institutions, we cannot be assured that we will not experience losses on our deposits.
Our stock price is subject to significant volatility
Our stock price is affected by a number of factors, including quarterly variations in financial results; the competitive landscape; general economic and market conditions; estimates, projections and speculation by the investment community and press; and rating agency upgrades and downgrades. As a result, our stock price is subject to significant volatility.
Events harming our companys reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial results and stock price
We are dependent on our reputation. Events that can damage our reputation include, but are not limited to, legal violations, actual or perceived ethical problems, product safety issues, actual or perceived poor employee relations, actual or perceived poor customer service, store appearance or operational issues, or events outside of our control which generate negative publicity with respect to our company. Any event that has the potential to negatively impact our reputation with customers, employees, suppliers, communities, governmental officials and others could have a materially adverse effect on our business prospects, financial results and stock price.
The foregoing list of risk factors is not all inclusive. Other factors and unanticipated events could adversely affect our business. We do not undertake to revise or update these risks to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
Our store support center and Hudson distribution center are located in a 1.4 million square foot facility on 105 acres in Hudson, Ohio. We own both the facility and the real estate. The distribution center occupies 1.0 million square feet and the remainder is used as our store support center, a large-format store, and office and retail space we lease to two other tenants. In addition, we own 65 acres of land adjacent to our Hudson, Ohio facility.
We lease and operate a 630,000 square foot distribution center located on an 80-acre site in Visalia, California. We also opened our third distribution center in April 2006. We own this 705,000 square foot facility and the 105-acre site that it is located on in Opelika, Alabama.
The remaining properties that we occupy are leased retail store facilities, located primarily in high-traffic shopping centers. All store leases are operating leases and generally have initial terms of 5 to 15 years with renewal options for up to 20 years. Certain store leases contain escalation clauses and contingent rents based on a percent of net sales in excess of defined minimums. During fiscal 2010, we incurred $182.2 million of rental expense, including common area maintenance, taxes and insurance for store locations. Despite closing 222 stores over the last five years, as of January 30, 2010, we were only paying rent on eight closed store locations for which we have been unable to reach an early lease termination settlement with the landlord or sublease the property.
As of January 30, 2010, the current terms of our store leases, assuming we exercise all lease renewal options, were as follows:
We are involved in various litigation matters in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation which we expect, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
The following information is set forth pursuant to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.
Our executive officers are as follows:
Darrell Webb has been our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since July 2006. From July 2006 to January 30, 2010, Mr. Webb also served as our President. Previously, he was President of Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger Company, a large supermarket retailer, from 2002 until July 2006; and President of Krogers Quality Food Center Division from 1999 to 2002.
Travis Smith has been our President and Chief Operating Officer since January 31, 2010. Mr. Smith was our Chief Operating Officer from February 2009 to January 30, 2010. Prior to February 2009, Mr. Smith was our Executive Vice President, Merchandising and Marketing from July 2006 to January 2009. For eight years prior to assuming this role, Mr. Smith held merchandising and marketing positions of increasing responsibility with Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger Company. Immediately prior to joining us, Mr. Smith was Senior Vice President, General Merchandise of Fred Meyer Stores.
Kenneth Haverkost has been our Executive Vice President, Store Operations since October 2007. For the 22 years prior to assuming his current role, Mr. Haverkost held positions of increasing responsibility with Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger Company. Immediately prior to joining us, Mr. Haverkost was Senior Vice President and Director of Store Operations of Fred Meyer Stores.
James Kerr has been our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since July 2006. For the eight years prior to assuming his current role, Mr. Kerr was our Vice President, Controller and he also served as the Chief Accounting Officer from February through July 2006.
Our common shares are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol JAS. As of April 1, 2010, there were 424 shareholders of record. The closing price of the shares on April 1, 2010 was $42.57.
The quarterly high and low closing stock prices for fiscal 2010 and 2009 are presented in the table below:
We did not pay cash dividends on our common shares during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009. Our dividend policy has been to retain earnings for operations and reinvestment into our business. Payments of dividends, if any, in the future will be determined by the Board of Directors in light of business conditions and other considerations. Under our secured credit facility, cash dividends are allowed up to a maximum of $20 million annually as long as we maintain a certain level of excess availability as defined in our secured credit facility.
See Part III, Item 12 for information regarding our equity compensation plans.
In December 1998, our Board of Directors authorized a discretionary program that allowed us to buy back 2,150,000 common shares. That program does not have a stated expiration date. In the table above, the total number of shares purchased represents shares repurchased directly from the market, as well as shares repurchased from employees in connection with the vesting of restricted shares that were provided to us to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 through April 9, 2010, we bought back 452,517 shares at an average price paid per share of $41.73.
The following graph compares the yearly changes in total shareholder return on our common shares with the total return of the S&P Composite 500 Stock Index, the S&P Specialty Stores Index and our peer group for the last five years. In each case, we assumed an initial investment of $100 on the market close on the last trading day before the beginning of the registrants fifth preceding fiscal year. Each subsequent date on the chart represents the last day of the indicated fiscal year. We did not pay any dividends during such five-year period. The S&P Specialty Stores Index is the same index that we used last year, which we titled S&P 600 Specialty Stores Index in our last Form 10-K. The peer group index consists of the following publicly held companies:
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents our selected financial data for each of our five fiscal years ending January 30, 2010. The selected financial data for all fiscal years presented was derived from the audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. We reclassified certain amounts in the financial statements for our four fiscal years ending January 31, 2009 to conform to the current year presentation.
This discussion provides the reader with information that will assist in an overall understanding of our financial statements, changes in certain key indicators from year to year, the factors that account for those changes and how certain accounting principles have impacted our financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements presented in this Form 10-K. In addition, the financial information presented for years prior to fiscal 2010 has been reclassified for certain amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
We are the nations largest specialty retailer of fabrics and one of the largest specialty retailers of crafts, serving customers in their pursuit of apparel and craft sewing, crafting, home decorating and other creative endeavors. Our retail stores and website feature a variety of competitively priced merchandise used in sewing, crafting and home decorating projects, including fabrics, notions, crafts, frames, paper crafting material, artificial floral, home accents, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise.
We review and manage to a number of key indicators in evaluating financial performance, the most significant of which are:
An overview of our fiscal 2010 performance compared with fiscal 2009 performance follows:
Executive Overview of Fiscal 2010
During fiscal 2010, we achieved sales, margin, earnings and cash flow improvement and our financial results exceeded our original expectations, primarily due to the execution of the following operating initiatives:
Our store remodel and optimization programs continued to generate incremental sales. During the year, we opened 20 new stores, completed 30 store remodels and optimized over 180 small-format stores.
Gross margin increased 260 basis points during fiscal 2010. The following four key factors that we discussed in previous quarters continued to positively impact gross margin:
We believe that the competitive environment provided us an opportunity to capture market share during fiscal 2010. In the specialty retail channel, we believe we are capturing market share from weaker competitors, based on our sales trend relative to other craft and fabric retailers. In addition, Wal-Mart continues to remove fabric departments as they remodel stores.
While executing the above operating initiatives, we maintained tight controls over expenses, inventory and capital spend. We focused on controlling those variables that were within our control when it appeared that top-line sales growth would be challenging, due to the recession. However, we exceeded our expectation for sales growth. Lowering our expense structure by implementing more efficient work processes in our stores and distribution centers, we were able to achieve the best financial results in the history of our company.
We expect the gross margin and expense improvements that we achieved during fiscal 2010 to be sustainable into fiscal 2011. In addition, we expect to increase gross margin and leverage expenses further during fiscal 2011, and to increase our operating margin above six percent. We plan to accomplish this continued improvement by executing our updated strategic plan, which we continue to refine with targeted new initiatives each year. All of these initiatives are designed to help us:
Some examples of new initiatives for fiscal 2011 include:
Based on the strong performance from our new, smaller prototype stores, we will increase our new store openings to at least 30 during fiscal 2011. We then expect to increase the number of new store openings by at least 10 stores per year over each of the following four years, for a compounded annual growth rate for retail square footage of about 2.5 percent over the five-year period between fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2015.
We plan to increase remodel activity in a similar fashion, since these projects continue to deliver favorable returns. We will complete at least 40 remodels during fiscal 2011, plus an incremental 10 projects per year over the following four years. This new store and remodel program will result in 95 percent of our store portfolio being either new or remodeled within the past 10 years, by the time we complete fiscal 2015.
As the U.S. census is getting underway, early forecasts suggest that all age groups over 50 will grow by 20 percent or more for the next decade. These age groups are among our most active sewers and crafters, so we believe the demographic trends are favorable for our business in the years to come. At the same time, we continue to cultivate the next generation of sewers and crafters with initiatives like our education program, prom contest and expanded kids craft assortment.
Finally, we believe the improving economy will provide a continued favorable environment for our performance during fiscal 2011. We believe that a modest recovery will provide meaningful benefit, as sales in those categories that struggled during the recession exert less pressure on same-store sales trends and promotional and clearance markdowns.
We are pleased with the progress we have made during fiscal 2010, in one of the most uncertain periods in U.S. retailing, which made our results challenging to forecast. As we move into fiscal 2011, we expect a
more normalized environment. Based upon our operating assumptions, our key considerations underlying our outlook for fiscal 2011 include:
We expect fiscal 2011 pre-opening and closing costs of approximately $13.0 million to $14.0 million as we plan to open approximately 30 stores and close approximately 30 stores.
We expect fiscal 2011 interest expense to be approximately $2.5 million, due to commitment fees, the amortization of deferred financing costs and one month of interest associated with our senior subordinated notes, all of which were redeemed at 100 percent of par on March 1, 2010. See Note 6 Financing, for further detail.
In order to minimize the earnings per share dilution that results from the issuance of shares under our equity incentive and employee stock purchase plans, we intend to make limited share repurchases during fiscal 2011 pursuant to our existing share repurchase authorization. We have approximately 936,000 shares remaining under this existing authorization. Our guidance does not reflect future share purchases.
The following table sets forth our financial information through operating profit, expressed as a percentage of net sales. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes.
Comparison of the 52 Weeks Ended January 30, 2010, January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008
Net sales. Net sales represent retail sales, net of estimated returns and exclude sales taxes. The following tables summarize the year-over-year comparison of our consolidated net sales and sales by segment for the periods indicated:
Consolidated net sales increased for fiscal 2010. With respect to our stores, same-store sales increased 3.1 percent compared with a same-store sales increase of 0.5 percent for fiscal 2009. The increase in fiscal 2010 same-store sales primarily was driven by an approximate 3.8 percent increase in customer transactions, our store remodel and optimization programs, more effective marketing and the benefit of competitive withdrawals in the sewing business. Our total store count at the end of the year of 746 was down 18 stores compared with fiscal 2009 and total store square footage decreased slightly from 16.0 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2009 to 15.9 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2010. In total, we opened 20 new stores and closed 38 stores during fiscal 2010, compared to fiscal 2009 when we opened 21 new stores and closed 31 stores.
Our sewing businesses represented 52 percent of our fiscal 2010 sales volume as compared to 51 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume. During fiscal 2010, our sewing businesses increased approximately 5.6 percent on a same-store sales basis as compared to an increase of approximately 3.9 percent during fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2010, we experienced positive same-store sales in the majority of our fabric and sewing notions merchandise categories, especially in quilting and sewing notions.
Our non-sewing businesses represented 48 percent of our fiscal 2010 sales volume compared to 49 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume. During fiscal 2010, our non-sewing businesses increased 0.3 percent on a same-store sales basis primarily due to sales in our core craft categories, particularly paper crafting, yarn and basic crafts. The increase in our non-sewing businesses was partially offset by a decline in seasonal categories.
Overall, consolidated net sales increased for fiscal 2009 primarily due to increased sales in our Joann.com entity. Fiscal 2009 represented our first full year of sales since we acquired the entity in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. With respect to our stores, same-store sales increased 0.5 percent compared with a same-store sales increase of 3.5 percent for fiscal 2008. The increase in fiscal 2009 same-store sales primarily was driven by an approximate 0.5 percent increase in average ticket due to a continuation of better in-stocks, more effective marketing and the benefit of competitive withdrawals in the sewing business. Our total store count at the end of the year of 764 was down ten stores compared with fiscal 2008; however, total store square footage increased slightly from 15.9 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2008 to 16.0 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2009. In total, we opened 21 new stores and closed 31 stores during fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008 when we opened six new stores and closed 33 stores.
On a category basis, our sewing businesses represented 51 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume as compared to 50 percent of our fiscal 2008 sales volume. During fiscal 2009, our sewing businesses increased approximately 3.9 percent on a same-store sales basis as compared to an increase of approximately 5.6 percent during fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, we experienced positive same-store sales in the majority of our fabric and sewing notions merchandise categories, especially in quilting and fleece.
Our non-sewing businesses represented 49 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume compared to 50 percent of our fiscal 2008 sales volume. During fiscal 2009, our non-sewing businesses decreased 3.4 percent on a same-store sales basis primarily due to sales declines in seasonal categories. Excluding seasonal categories, craft same-store sales were slightly positive during fiscal 2009, with particular strength in the yarn and basic craft shops.
Sales for large-format stores increased for fiscal 2010 primarily due to the net increase in the number of new stores and positive same-store sales.
Same-store sales for large-format stores increased 1.4 percent for fiscal 2010, versus a same-store sales decrease of 1.0 percent for the same period last year. Our large-format stores performed well; however, they have a greater mix of seasonal product and higher ticket items compared to our small-format stores, which negatively impacted their same-store sales during fiscal 2010. Customer transactions for large-format stores increased by approximately 3.4 percent while average ticket decreased 2.0 percent. Large-format stores accounted for 53.9 percent and 52.5 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
The number of large-format stores increased to 228 from 210 in fiscal 2009, which is the net result of 15 new stores and six small-format stores that were reclassified as large-format stores due to remodeling efforts during fiscal 2010, less the closing of three large-format stores.
Sales for small-format stores increased for fiscal 2010 due to the increase in same-store sales, partially offset by the decrease in store count. We continued to see the ongoing benefits from store remodels and optimizations in our small-format stores during fiscal 2010.
The number of small-format stores decreased to 518 in fiscal 2010 from 554 in the prior year, which is the net result of the opening of five new small-format stores, the closing of 35 small-format stores and the previously mentioned reclassification of six small-format stores to large-format stores during the year.
Same-store sales performance for small-format stores increased 5.1 percent for fiscal 2010 versus a same-store sales increase of 2.1 percent for fiscal 2009. The fiscal 2010 increase in same-store sales for small-format stores was due to an approximate 4.2 percent increase in customer transactions combined with an approximate 0.9 percent increase in average ticket. Small-format stores accounted for 44.2 percent and 45.6 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
Sales included in our other segment represent sales from Joann.com, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Sales for large-format stores increased for fiscal 2009 primarily due to the net increase in the number of new stores, partially offset by negative same-store sales.
Same-store sales for large-format stores decreased 1.0 percent for fiscal 2009, versus a same-store sales increase of 3.9 percent for fiscal 2008. Large-format stores have a greater mix of seasonal product and higher ticket items compared to our small-format stores, which contributed to the weaker performance of the large-format stores during fiscal 2009. Customer transactions and average ticket for large-format stores decreased by approximately 0.6 percent and 0.4 percent, respectively. Large-format stores accounted for 52.5 percent and 52.7 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively.
The number of large-format stores increased to 210 from 196 in fiscal 2009, which is the net result of eleven new stores and five small-format stores that were reclassified as large-format stores due to remodeling efforts during fiscal 2009, less the closing of two large-format stores.
Sales for small-format stores decreased for fiscal 2009 due to the decrease in total store count, partially offset by the increase in same-store sales.
The number of small-format stores decreased to 554 in fiscal 2009 from 578 in the prior year, which is the net result of the closing of 29 small-format stores, the opening of ten new small-format stores and the previously mentioned reclassification of five small-format stores to large-format stores during the year.
Same-store sales performance for small-format stores increased 2.1 percent for fiscal 2009 versus a same-store sales increase of 3.0 percent for fiscal 2008. The fiscal 2009 increase in same-store sales for small-format stores was due to an approximate 1.8 percent increase in average ticket combined with an approximate 0.3 percent increase in customer transactions. Small-format stores accounted for 45.6 percent and 46.7 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively.
Sales included in our other segment represent sales from Joann.com, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The increase in sales for fiscal 2009 is attributable to experiencing a full year of sales from Joann.com as compared to one quarter in fiscal 2008.
Gross margin increased for fiscal 2010 in relation to the increase in net sales. As a percent of net sales, gross margin increased 260 basis points compared with fiscal 2009. The improvement in the gross margin rate for fiscal 2010 primarily was due to reduced product costs from global sourcing, product cost deflation on imports and new systems capabilities. In addition, our seasonal sell-through for the holiday season during fiscal 2010 was better than the prior year and allowed us to sell through seasonal product earlier in the season, resulting in improved margins.
Gross margin increased for fiscal 2009 in relation to the increase in net sales. As a percent of net sales, gross margin was flat compared with fiscal 2008. The margin rate during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was up as compared to the same time period of fiscal 2008, but markdowns taken during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 resulted in comparable gross margin rates year-over-year. In order to ensure a reasonable sell-through of seasonal merchandise during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we elected to take pricing actions on seasonal products earlier in the fourth quarter as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. SG&A expenses include store and administrative payroll, employee benefits, stock-based compensation, certain distribution costs, store occupancy costs, advertising
expenses and administrative expenses. Some of our competitors and other retailers include distribution costs and store occupancy costs in gross margin. The types of distribution costs that we classify as selling, general and administrative expense include administrative, occupancy, depreciation, labor and other indirect costs that are incurred to support the distribution network. These costs are not directly associated with the value of the merchandise sold in our stores, but rather they relate primarily to the handling of merchandise for delivery to our stores and are expensed as incurred.
Distribution costs included within SG&A amounted to $49.0 million, $54.3 million and $59.5 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Store occupancy costs included within SG&A amounted to $186.6 million, $180.5 million and $178.2 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
SG&A for fiscal 2010 decreased as a percentage of net sales. Our improved SG&A leverage reflects our continued focus on controlling costs, which have increased by 2.4 percent during fiscal 2010, while, for the same period, net sales increased by 4.7 percent as compared to fiscal 2009.
Stock-based compensation expense, which is included within SG&A, was $10.9 million for fiscal 2010, compared with $9.4 million in fiscal 2009. Included within stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2010 is $1.9 million related to the Stock Value Bonus Plan.
SG&A for fiscal 2009 decreased as a percentage of net sales primarily due to our continued efforts to control expenses. The additional full year sales during fiscal 2009 from Joann.com, which has a lower expense structure than the retail stores, also contributed to the improved leverage. Fiscal 2008 only included three months of sales from Joann.com because the acquisition of the Internet business was not finalized until the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Stock-based compensation expense, which is included within SG&A, was $9.4 million for fiscal 2009, compared with $8.3 million in fiscal 2008.
Store pre-opening and closing costs. Pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred. These costs include lease costs recognized prior to the store opening, hiring and training costs for new employees and processing of initial merchandise. Store closing costs, which are also expensed as incurred, consist of lease termination costs, lease costs for closed locations, loss on disposal of fixtures and equipment, severance for employees, third-party inventory liquidator costs and other costs incidental to store closings.
Store pre-opening and closing costs decreased in fiscal 2010. Pre-opening costs decreased during fiscal 2010 due to fewer store openings as well as the timing of the opening of the new stores in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. Store closing costs increased during fiscal 2010 since we closed seven more stores in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal 2009.
Store pre-opening and closing costs increased in fiscal 2009, due to a net increase in new store activity during fiscal 2009. Pre-opening costs increased during fiscal 2009 since we opened more stores in fiscal 2009 than in fiscal 2008. Store closing costs decreased during fiscal 2009 since we closed fewer stores in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.1 million to $56.3 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2010 was due to incremental depreciation associated with fiscal 2009 and 2010 expenditures related to technology as well as spending on new stores and remodels.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.4 million to $54.2 million in fiscal 2009. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2009 was due to incremental depreciation associated with our investment in new store systems and store related expenditures, including store remodels and new store openings.
Operating profit for fiscal 2010 increased primarily due to the increase in same-store sales, improvement in gross margin and our continued efforts to control expenses.
Operating profit for fiscal 2009 increased primarily due to the improvement in large-format store operating profit combined with our continued efforts to control expenses.
The improvement in large-format store operating profit was driven primarily by the $75.2 million increase in store sales volume, which was primarily due to the net increase in the number of new stores, combined with improvement in gross margin and our continued efforts to control expenses.
The improvement in small-format store operating profit was driven primarily by a 5.1 percent increase in same-store sales, which was due partially to the store remodels and optimizations that occurred during fiscal 2010, combined with improvement in gross margin and our continued efforts to control expenses.
The increase in operating loss during fiscal 2010 of our other segment is primarily due to an increase in incentive compensation expense based on our current year performance. The other segment includes unallocated corporate overhead in addition to the operating results of our Internet business.
The improvement in large-format store operating profit was primarily driven by the $8.3 million increase in store sales volume. The decline in operating profit of the small-format stores was driven by a $9.8 million decrease in sales volume. The sales volume fluctuation between large-format and small-format stores is due to the net overall 14 new large-format stores that were opened during fiscal 2009 as compared to a net 24 small-format store decrease during the year. The improvement in operating loss during fiscal 2009 of our other segment is primarily due to our continued efforts to control expenses. The other segment includes unallocated corporate overhead in addition to the operating results of our Internet business.
Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes. During fiscal 2010, we recorded a pre-tax gain of $1.3 million as a result of the purchase of $18.5 million of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at an average of 92 percent of par, net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. During fiscal 2009 we recorded a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million, as a result of the purchase of $34.0 million of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at an average of 87 percent of par, net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs.
Interest expense. Interest expense for fiscal 2010 decreased $3.1 million to $6.3 million. The decrease is attributable to lower average debt levels. Our average debt levels were $50 million in fiscal 2010 versus $101 million in the prior year. Interest expense for fiscal 2009 decreased $3.1 million to $9.4 million. The decrease was attributable to lower average debt levels. Our average debt levels were $101 million in fiscal 2009 versus $145 million in the prior year.
Income taxes. Our effective income tax rate for fiscal 2010 increased to 39.0 percent from 38.3 percent in fiscal 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate is based primarily on the net effect of changes to our state and local tax positions. Our effective rate is subject to change based on the mix of income from different
state jurisdictions, which tax at different rates, as well as the change in status or outcome of uncertain tax positions.
Our effective income tax rate for fiscal 2009 increased to 38.3 percent from 38.1 percent in fiscal 2008. The increase in the effective tax rate was based primarily on the net effect of changes to our deferred tax assets and to our reserves for uncertain tax positions. Our effective rate is subject to change based on the mix of income from different state jurisdictions, which tax at different rates, as well as the change in status or outcome of uncertain tax positions.
Expenses recorded relating to store closings were $6.2 million, $4.5 million and $5.3 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These charges are included in the line item Store pre-opening and closing costs in our statements of operations included in our consolidated financial statements.
The store closing reserve was $0.7 million and $0.6 million as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The reserve is comprised of miscellaneous liquidation costs, which are incurred but not paid.
In fiscal 2010, we granted 165,634 performance shares, 489,340 time-based restricted shares and 278,702 non-qualified stock options to team members at the Vice President level and above. Beginning in fiscal 2010, employees below the Vice President level who participate in the Long-Term Incentive (LTI) program receive, instead of restricted shares (and in some cases performance shares) that such employees formerly received, a cash settled payment under the Stock Value Bonus Plan.
The Stock Value Bonus Plan takes the participants LTI value and converts it to units based on the closing stock price at the grant date. At the end of the fiscal year, the closing stock price on the third business day following the year-end earnings release is multiplied times the number of units to determine the actual LTI incentive, which is limited to 150 percent of the fair market value of the underlying common shares on the grant date. The value will be locked in and will be paid in equal installments over a two or three-year vesting period if the grantee remains in the continuous service of the company throughout the vesting period.
In fiscal 2009, we granted 105,580 performance shares and 584,853 non-qualified stock options to the Vice President level and above, and 370,877 time-based restricted shares to team members at the manager level and above.
In fiscal 2008, we granted 5,633 performance shares to the Vice President level and above, and 172,435 time-based restricted shares and 660,173 non-qualified stock options to team members at the manager level and above. However, we did not grant any time-based restricted shares to our executive officers with the exception of 31,847 shares granted to a new executive officer in connection with his commencement of employment and which are included in the 172,435 shares mentioned above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our capital requirements are primarily for capital expenditures in connection with infrastructure investments, new store openings, store remodel activity and working capital requirements for seasonal inventory builds and new store inventory purchases. Working capital requirements needed to finance our operations fluctuate during the year and reach their highest levels during the third fiscal quarter as we increase our inventory in preparation for our peak selling season during the months of September through December. These requirements are funded through a combination of internally generated cash flows from operations, credit extended by suppliers and borrowings under our credit facility.
The following table provides cash flow related information for the three fiscal years ended January 30, 2010.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $26.1 million in fiscal 2010. The year-over-year increase in cash provided by operations was attributable primarily to a $44.7 million increase in net income for fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009.
Inventories decreased in fiscal 2010 by $12.6 million, primarily due to reductions occurring in our fashion and seasonal inventories. Average store level inventory was down 0.8 percent with the balance of the inventory reduction coming out of our distribution centers. During fiscal 2010, we maintained consistent store in-stocks and had no holiday merchandise carryover at year end. Inventory turns for fiscal 2010 were approximately 2.4 compared with 2.3 in fiscal 2009.
Total operating assets and liabilities in fiscal 2010 increased by $48.5 million, which is net of landlord allowances of $10.5 million and is primarily the result of a $28.8 million increase in accrued expenses combined with a $12.6 million decrease in inventories. The increase in accrued expenses is primarily the result of a $14.5 million increase in accrued compensation and $9.8 million increase in accrued taxes, both of which are directly related to our improved performance during fiscal 2010. We negotiate landlord allowances as we build certain new store locations. See the discussion under Capital Expenditures below.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $84.3 million in fiscal 2009. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2009 primarily was attributable to the decrease in inventories and increase in accounts payable.
Inventories decreased by $42.8 million in fiscal 2009, compared with an increase of $18.8 million in fiscal 2008. The decrease in inventory primarily is due to our inventory initiatives to reduce seasonal and fashion merchandise. Average store level inventory was down 5.0 percent with the balance of the inventory reduction coming out of our distribution centers. During fiscal 2009, we maintained consistent store in-stocks and had no holiday merchandise carryover at year end. Inventory turns for fiscal 2009 were approximately 2.3 compared with 2.2 in fiscal 2008.
Total operating assets and liabilities in fiscal 2009 increased by $66.1 million, which is net of landlord allowances of $11.1 million and is primarily the result of a $42.8 million reduction in inventory combined with a $15.7 million increase in accounts payable. We negotiate landlord allowances as we build certain new store locations.
Net cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 consisted of capital expenditures and a delayed payment related to the fiscal 2008 acquisition of the remaining equity of Joann.com. Net cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2008 was comprised of capital expenditures of $37.7 million and the initial cash purchase price of the acquisition of the remaining equity of Joann.com of $11.7 million (net of cash acquired).
Capital expenditures estimated for fiscal 2011 and for the last three fiscal years consist of cash expenditures and cash expenditures reimbursed by our landlords. Capital expenditures primarily relate to the operation of the stores, including new store openings and information technology. We also incur capital outlays for distribution center equipment and other non-store capital investments. Landlord reimbursed capital expenditures represent the cost of assets acquired with landlord lease incentives. Capital expenditures are summarized as follows:
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 totaled $39.7 million. Store-related expenditures, including those for our store openings, accounted for approximately 76 percent, or $30.3 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2010. Expenditures related to technology accounted for approximately 16 percent, or $6.4 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2010, we opened 15 large-format and five small-format stores and remodeled 30 stores.
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 totaled $74.7 million. Store-related expenditures, including those for our store openings, accounted for approximately 65 percent, or $48.7 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2009. Expenditures related to technology accounted for approximately 31 percent, or $23.3 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2009, we opened 11 large-format and ten small-format stores and remodeled 29 stores.
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 totaled $37.7 million. Store-related expenditures, including those for store openings, accounted for approximately 70 percent, or $26.4 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2008. Expenditures related to technology accounted for approximately 23 percent, or $8.7 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2008, we opened six large-format stores and remodeled 26 stores.
We anticipate that capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 will be approximately $64 million, or $50 million net of landlord allowances received. We plan to open approximately 30 new stores. We also plan to remodel at least 40 stores.
Net cash used for financing activities was $4.7 million in fiscal 2010 compared with $24.9 million in fiscal 2009. Debt at the end of fiscal 2010 was $47.5 million and consisted of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes. Debt levels decreased $18.5 million during fiscal 2010, compared with a net decrease of $34.0 million in the prior year. During fiscal 2010, we purchased $18.5 million in face value of the senior subordinated notes at an average of 92 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $1.3 million, representing the cash discount received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. These charges are reflected in the gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes line item in the statement of operations.
On March 1, 2010, the company redeemed all outstanding principal amount of its 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes of approximately $47.5 million at par early, which was announced on January 5, 2010. As such, the company has classified the senior subordinated notes as short-term as of January 30, 2010.
Net cash used for financing activities was $24.9 million in fiscal 2009 compared with $17.2 million in fiscal 2008. Long-term debt at the end of fiscal 2009 was $66.0 million and consisted of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes. Debt levels decreased $34.0 million during fiscal 2009, compared with a net decrease of $25.3 million in the prior year. During fiscal 2009, we purchased $34.0 million in face value of the notes at an average of 87 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million, representing the cash discount
received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. These charges are reflected in the gain on purchase of notes line item in the statement of operations.
As of January 30, 2010, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $242.5 million under our Amended Credit Facility.
During fiscal 2010, we purchased 106,213 of our common shares at an aggregate price of $1.8 million, which represented shares repurchased from employees to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding requirements in connection with the vesting of restricted shares. As of January 30, 2010, we were authorized to purchase up to an additional 936,053 common shares under the existing authorization from our Board of Directors.
We have three principal sources of liquidity: cash from operations, cash and cash equivalents on hand and our Amended Credit Facility.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash from operations and availability under our Amended Credit Facility will be sufficient to cover our working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirement needs for the foreseeable future.
Our liquidity is based, in part, on our debt ratings. As of the end of fiscal 2010, our long-term unsecured debt was rated B2 by Moodys Investor Services and B− by Standard & Poors. Both Moodys and Standard & Poors rate our outlook as stable. In September 2009, Moodys raised our rating on our long-term unsecured debt from B3 to B2 with a stable outlook. Moodys attributes the change in ratings to the material improvement in our financial profile, operating performance and our ability to continue to generate positive free cash flow. In May 2009, Standard & Poors raised our rating from CCC+ to B− with a stable outlook. The change in ratings by Standard & Poors reflects its view that our operating results have improved and the expectation that working capital, free cash flow and debt protection measures will continue to improve. In assessing our credit strength, both Moodys and Standard & Poors consider our capital structure and financial policies, as well as our consolidated balance sheet and other financial information. Downgrades of our credit ratings could adversely impact, among other things, our future borrowing costs, access to capital markets and new store operating lease costs, although we anticipate no short-term effect under our current credit arrangements.
Our debt obligations as of the end of fiscal 2010 represent $47.5 million outstanding under our 7.5 percent Notes.
Secured Bank Credit Facility. On September 5, 2008, we entered into the Amended Credit Facility by amending certain terms and extending the maturity of our Credit Facility, originally entered into as of April 24, 2001. The Amended Credit Facility, which expires on September 5, 2013, is a $300 million revolver with Bank of America, N.A. and seven other lenders and is secured by a first priority security interest in our inventory, accounts receivable, personal property and other assets and is guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have the option to request an increase in the size of the Amended Credit Facility up to $100 million (for a total facility of $400 million) in increments of $25 million, provided that no default exists or would arise from the increase. However, the lenders under the Amended Credit Facility are not under any obligation to provide any such additional increments. Interest on borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility is calculated at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent or the banks base rate plus 0.75 percent to 1.25 percent, both of which are dependent on the level of average excess availability during the previous fiscal month. The Amended Credit Facility contains a sub-limit for letters of credit of $200 million. Deferred financing costs of $2.3 million, of which $0.4 million relates to the unamortized portion of the deferred financing costs of the previous Credit Facility, are being amortized over the term of the Amended Credit Facility. As of January 30, 2010, we had $18.4 million in standby letters of credit outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility.
We did not borrow on the Amended Credit Facility during fiscal 2010. Our weighted average interest rate and weighted average borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility were 6.1 percent and $8.1 million during fiscal 2009.
The Amended Credit Facility contains customary covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or guarantee obligations, engage in mergers or consolidations, dispose of assets, make investments, acquisitions, loans or advances, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, create liens, or change the nature of our business. We are restricted in our ability to prepay or modify the terms of other indebtedness, pay dividends and make other distributions when excess availability, which represents net borrowing capacity, falls below certain levels. Further, we are required to comply with a minimum fixed charge ratio covenant, if excess availability is less than ten percent of the borrowing base at any time. As of January 30, 2010, excess availability was $242.5 million. The Amended Credit Facility also defines various events of default, including cross-default provisions, defaults for any material judgments or a change in control. At January 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Amended Credit Facility. Failure to comply with these restrictions and covenants could result in defaults under our Amended Credit Facility. Any default, if not waived, could result in our debt becoming immediately due and payable.
In November 2007, we amended our Credit Facility to allow for the acquisition of the remaining equity of IdeaForest.com, Inc., which was renamed Joann.com, Inc. after acquisition and subsequently converted to a limited liability company named joann.com, LLC.
Senior Subordinated Notes. On February 26, 2004, we issued $100 million 7.5 percent notes due 2012. Interest on the notes was payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year. Deferred financing costs recorded at issuance of $2.6 million are reflected in other long-term assets and are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the notes utilizing the effective interest method. Beginning March 1, 2008, we had the option of redeeming the notes at any time, in accordance with certain call provisions of the related note indenture. The notes represented unsecured obligations that were subordinated to the Amended Credit Facility and were fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
During fiscal 2010, we purchased $18.5 million in face value of the 7.5 percent notes at an average of 92 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $1.3 million representing the cash discount received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. This pre-tax gain is reflected on the gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes line item in the statement of operations.
During fiscal 2009, we purchased $34.0 million in face value of the 7.5 percent notes at an average of 87 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million representing the cash discount received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. This pre-tax gain is reflected on the gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes line item in the statement of operations.
The market price of the 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at January 30, 2010 in the high yield debt market was approximately at par value. Accordingly, the fair value of the notes approximated the carrying value of approximately $47.5 million.
Subsequent to fiscal 2010 and as of March 1, 2010, we redeemed all of the outstanding principal amount of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at 100 percent of par and as a result, we have classified the balance of the senior subordinated notes as a current liability at January 30, 2010.
Our liquidity is not dependent on the use of off-balance sheet transactions other than letters of credit and operating leases, which are typical in a retail environment.
Contractual Obligation and Commitments
The following table summarizes our future cash outflows resulting from contractual obligations and commitments as of January 30, 2010:
Seasonality and Inflation
Our business exhibits seasonality, which is typical for most retail companies. Our sales are stronger in the second half of the year than the first half of the year. Net earnings are highest during the months of September through December when sales volumes provide significant operating leverage. Working capital requirements needed to finance our operations fluctuate during the year and reach their highest levels during the second and third fiscal quarters as we increase our inventory in preparation for our peak selling season during the fourth quarter.
Summarized below are key line items by quarter from our statements of operations and balance sheets:
We believe that inflation has not had a significant effect on the growth of net sales or on net income (loss) over the past three years. There can be no assurance, however, that our operating results will not be affected by inflation in the future.
We strive to report our financial results in a clear and understandable manner. We follow generally accepted accounting principles in preparing our consolidated financial statements. These principles require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be relevant under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and/or conditions. We continually evaluate the information used to make these estimates as our business and the economic environment changes. The use of estimates is pervasive throughout our financial statements. The accounting policies that involve estimates or assumptions that are material due to levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or are susceptible to change and we consider most critical are as follows:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a weighted average basis. Inventory valuation methods require certain management estimates and judgments, the most significant of which involves estimates of net realizable value on product designated for clearance, which affects the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as the gross margin reported for the year.
We estimate our reserve for clearance product based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, quantities of slow moving or carryover seasonal merchandise on hand, historical recovery statistics and future merchandising plans. The accuracy of our estimates can be affected by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including changes in economic conditions and consumer buying trends. The corresponding reduction to gross margin is recorded in the period the decision is made.
We do not believe that the assumptions used in our estimate will change significantly based on prior experience. A one percent increase or decrease in the clearance reserve would have impacted operating profit by approximately $0.2 million for the year ended January 30, 2010.
Our accrual for shrink is estimated as a percent of sales. The percent used in the determination of the accrual is based on actual historical shrink results of our stores. This estimated percent is applied to sales of our stores for the periods following the stores most recent physical inventory. In addition, we analyze our
accrual using actual results as physical inventory counts are taken and reconciled to the general ledger. Substantially all of our store physical inventory counts are taken in the first three quarters of each year. All store locations that have been open one year or longer are physically inventoried once a year. A ten basis point increase or decrease in the estimated shrink percent would have impacted operating profit by approximately $1.4 million for the year ended January 30, 2010.
We evaluate recoverability of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable (for example, when a stores performance falls below minimum company standards). In the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or earlier if indicators of impairment exist, we review the performance of individual stores. Underperforming stores are selected for further evaluation of the recoverability of the stores net asset values. If the evaluation, done on an undiscounted cash flow basis, indicates that a stores net asset value may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured as the excess of carrying value over the fair value of the impaired asset. We estimate fair value based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate that is considered to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Additional factors are taken into consideration, such as local market conditions and operating environment.
Impairment losses totaling $2.4 million, $2.0 million and $0.6 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were recorded for underperforming stores, underutilized assets and/or other facilities. If different assumptions were made or different market conditions were present, any estimated potential impairment amounts could have varied from recorded amounts.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we conducted the annual impairment testing on our goodwill acquired in the Joann.com acquisition. We consider the Joann.com entity to be a stand alone operating segment and reporting unit as discrete financial information is available at this level. As such, we tested our goodwill for impairment at this level. The impairment evaluation process is an income-based approach that utilizes discounted cash flows for the determination of the enterprise fair value of Joann.com. This process requires significant judgments, including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for our business, estimation of the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of our weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. As a result of our impairment analysis, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired for fiscal 2010. We used 14.5 percent for WACC for fiscal 2010. A one percent change in the WACC rate represents an approximate $1.5 million change to the enterprise fair value of Joann.com. A one percent change in the terminal growth rate and long-term growth rate represents an approximate combined $1.0 million change to the enterprise fair value. Neither assumption change would have resulted in an impairment for goodwill. Only significant changes in these assumptions would result in an enterprise fair value that would be less than the carrying value of this reporting unit.
Income taxes are estimated for each jurisdiction in which we operate. This involves assessing the current tax exposure together with temporary differences, which result from differing treatment of items for tax and book purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are provided for based on these assessments. Deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability based on estimated future taxable income. To the extent that recovery is deemed unlikely, a valuation allowance is recorded. During fiscal 2010, we increased our valuation allowance by $0.2 million. The increase was primarily the result of recording state credits and an associated valuation allowance against those credits offset by the reduction of the state net operating loss valuation allowance. Many years of data have been incorporated into the determination of tax reserves, and our estimates have historically proven to be reasonable.
We have various stock-based compensation plans that we utilize as compensation for our Board of Directors, executive officers, senior management and other key employees. Our annual stock option and restricted stock award grants have averaged about 3.8 percent, 4.5 percent and 3.4 percent of outstanding shares for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of January 30, 2010, options to purchase 1.3 million common shares, representing 5.1 percent of total shares, were outstanding, of which 0.4 million were exercisable. All of the exercisable options had an exercise price below the closing end-of-year stock price of $35.02.
Beginning in fiscal 2010, employees below the Vice President level who participate in the LTI program receive, instead of restricted shares (and in some cases performance shares) that such employees formerly received, a cash-settled payment under the Stock Value Bonus Plan. Under the Stock Value Bonus Plan, the participant receives a payment of an amount equal to the fair market value of a common share on the date of vesting of the payout limited to 150% of the grant price of the companys stock. The value will be locked in and will be paid in equal installments over a two or three-year vesting period if the grantee remains in the continuous service of the company throughout the vesting period.
We estimate the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires the input of assumptions, which we update regularly based on historical trends and current market observations. We do not pay dividends and no dividend rate assumption was used. We estimate expected volatility based on the historical volatility of the price of our common shares over the life of the awards. We believe the historical volatility is a reasonable expectation of future volatility. We also use historical experience to estimate the expected life of stock-based compensation awards and employee terminations. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yields of U.S. Treasury instruments with approximately the same term as the expected life of stock-based awards granted.
As of January 30, 2010, there was $1.5 million, $5.8 million and $1.3 million of compensation cost not yet recognized or earned related to stock options, non-vested restricted stock awards and cash-settled Stock Value Bonus Plan payout, respectively, which is expected to be recognized as earned over weighted-average periods of 1.6, 1.5 and 1.3 years, respectively.
See Notes 1 and 8 to our consolidated financial statements for more details of our stock-based compensation.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We define free cash flow as net income plus depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense and changes in working capital, less capital expenditures, net of landlord allowances. Free cash flow is considered a non-GAAP financial measure under the rules of the SEC. We believe that free cash flow is a relevant financial measure for use in evaluating our financial performance because it measures our ability to generate additional cash from our business operations.
Free cash flow should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, income from continuing operations as a measure of our performance or net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities, a GAAP measure, to free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance related to fair value measurements. The guidance is intended to provide additional direction regarding fair value measurements. Included in this new guidance are:
This new guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The company adopted these pronouncements beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the companys consolidated financial statements.
Certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views of future events and financial performance, involve certain risks and uncertainties. When used herein, the terms anticipates, plans, estimates, expects, believes, intends, and similar expressions as they relate to us or future events or conditional verbs such as will, should, would, may, and could are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Our actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause or contribute to such material differences include, but are not limited to, the items described in
Item 1A. Risk Factors as well as changes in general economic conditions, risks in implementing new marketing initiatives, natural disasters and geo-political events, changes in customer demand, changes in trends in the fabric and craft industry, changes in the competitive pricing for products, the impact of competitors store openings and closings, our dependence on suppliers, seasonality, disruptions to the transportation system or increases in transportation costs, energy costs, our ability to recruit and retain highly qualified personnel, our ability to manage our inventory, our ability to effectively manage our distribution network, disruptions to our information systems, failure to maintain the security of our electronic and other confidential information, failure to comply with various laws and regulations, failure to successfully implement the store growth strategy, changes in accounting standards and effective tax rates, inadequacy of our insurance coverage, cash and cash equivalents held at financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits, volatility of our stock price, damage to our reputation, and other factors. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are indirectly exposed to foreign currency fluctuations on merchandise that is sourced internationally and the impact of interest rate changes on our outstanding borrowings under our Amended Credit Facility.
We believe foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations do not contain significant market risk due to the nature of our relationships with our international vendors. All merchandise contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars and are subject to negotiation prior to our commitment for purchases. As a result, there is not a direct correlation between merchandise prices and fluctuations in the exchange rate. We sourced approximately 23 percent of our purchases internationally in fiscal 2010. Our international purchases are concentrated in China and other Asian countries.
In the normal course of business we employ established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. Our objective in managing the exposure to interest rate changes is to limit the volatility and impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. This is accomplished through the debt structure we originally set in place in fiscal 2005, which consists of the fixed rate $100 million senior subordinated notes of which $47.5 million were outstanding at fiscal 2010 year-end but all of which were redeemed subsequent to year-end, and our Amended Credit Facility, which is designed to be a working capital facility. We estimate that a one percent increase or decrease in interest rates, based on fiscal 2010 average debt levels, would not cause an increase or decrease to interest expense.
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (the company) as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholders equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. at January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Effective February 4, 2007, the company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (codified in FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 15, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
April 15, 2010
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
See notes to consolidated financial statements
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
See notes to consolidated financial statements
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
See notes to consolidated financial statements
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
See notes to consolidated financial statements
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (the company), an Ohio corporation, is a fabric and craft retailer with 746 retail stores in 48 states at January 30, 2010. The 518 small-format, 228 large-format stores and our website feature a variety of competitively priced merchandise used in sewing, crafting and home decorating projects, including fabrics, notions, crafts, frames, paper crafting material, artificial floral, home accents, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise.
The company manages its business in operating segments that are reportable segments: large-format stores, small-format stores and other. See Note 12 Segment Reporting for further detail.
The significant accounting policies applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the company are summarized below.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain amounts in the fiscal 2009 and 2008 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Since actual results may differ from those estimates, the company revises its estimates and assumptions, as new information becomes available.
The companys fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years consist of 52 weeks, unless noted otherwise. The fiscal year refers to the year in which the period ends (e.g., fiscal 2010 refers to the year-ended January 30, 2010).
Cash and cash equivalents include amounts on deposit with financial institutions and investments held in money market accounts, with maturities of less than 90 days. The amount of cash equivalents held in money market accounts at January 30, 2010 was $89.5 million and the related weighted-average interest rate was 0.25 percent. We did not have any cash equivalents held in money market accounts at January 31, 2009.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a weighted average basis. Inventory valuation methods require certain management estimates and judgments, which affect the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as the gross margin reported for the year. These valuation methods include estimates of net realizable value on product designated for clearance and estimates of shrink between periods when the company conducts distribution center inventory cycle counts and store physical inventories to substantiate inventory balances.
The companys accrual for shrink is based on the actual historical shrink results of recent distribution center inventory cycle counts and store physical inventories. These estimates are compared to actual results as
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
physical inventory counts are taken and reconciled to the general ledger. Substantially all of the companys entire store physical inventory counts are taken in the first three quarters of each year and the shrink accrual recorded at January 30, 2010 is based on shrink results of these prior physical inventories. All store locations that have been open one year or longer are physically inventoried once a year. The company continually monitors and adjusts the shrink rate estimates based on the results of store physical inventories and shrink trends.
Inventory reserves for clearance product are estimated based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, quantities of slow moving or carryover seasonal merchandise on hand, historical recovery statistics and future merchandising plans. The accuracy of the companys estimates can be affected by many factors, some of which are outside of the companys control, including changes in economic conditions and consumer buying trends.
Consignment inventory is not reflected in the companys consolidated financial statements. Consignment inventory consists of patterns, magazines, books, DVDs and greeting cards. Consignment inventory can be returned to the vendor at any time. At the time consigned inventory is sold, the company records the purchase liability in accounts payable and the related cost of merchandise in cost of sales. The company had approximately $33.0 million of consignment inventory on hand at January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively.
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are recorded over the estimated useful life of the assets principally by the straight-line method. The major classes of assets and ranges of estimated useful lives are: buildings from ten to 40 years; furniture, fixtures and equipment from two to ten years; and leasehold improvements for the lesser of ten years or over the remaining life of the lease. Maintenance and repair expenditures are charged to expense as incurred and improvements and major renewals are capitalized.
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements consist of the following:
The company capitalized $2.1 million and $9.9 million in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively, for internal use software acquired from third parties. The capitalized amounts are included in property, equipment and leasehold improvements. The company amortizes internal use software on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to five years beginning at the time the software becomes operational. Amortization expense was $4.6 million, $3.6 million and $2.1 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets of acquired entities. The company assesses the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets annually or whenever circumstances indicate that a decline in value may have occurred, utilizing a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business unit one level below that operating segment, for which discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by segment management.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step impairment test. In the first step, the company compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. The company determines the fair value of its reporting units using valuation techniques including discounted cash flows. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the company must perform the second step in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill and compare it to the carrying value of the reporting units goodwill. The activities in the second step include valuing the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of the impaired reporting unit based on their fair value and determining the fair value of the impaired reporting units goodwill based upon the residual of the summed identified tangible and intangible assets and liabilities.
The goodwill carried on the companys balance sheet at January 30, 2010 represented the excess of purchase price and related costs over the fair value assigned to the net assets of IdeaForest.com, Inc. (IdeaForest), which was renamed Joann.com, Inc. upon acquisition and subsequently converted to a limited liability company named joann.com, LLC. The company tests goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, and more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may exist. The company performed its annual impairment testing as of November 3, 2009 and determined that no impairment charge was necessary.
The company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results and significant changes in the manner of use of the assets or the companys overall business strategies. Potential impairment exists if the estimated undiscounted cash flow expected to result from the use of the assets is less than the carrying value of the asset. The amount of the impairment loss represents the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. Management estimates fair value based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate that is considered to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the companys current business model. Additional factors are taken into consideration, such as local market conditions, operating environment and other trends.
Based on managements ongoing review of the performance of its stores and other facilities, the following impairment losses were recorded and are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) on the consolidated statement of operations.
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Store pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and relate to the costs incurred prior to a new store opening, which includes the hiring and training costs for new employees, processing costs of initial merchandise and rental expense for the period prior to the store opening for business. See Note 4 Store Closings for further detail.
The company recognizes costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. In addition, any liabilities that arise from exit or disposal activities are initially measured and recorded at fair value. See Note 4 Store Closings.
The company estimates certain material expenses in an effort to record those expenses in the period incurred. The companys most material estimates relate to compensation, taxes and insurance-related expenses, significant portions of which are self-insured. The ultimate cost of the companys workers compensation and general liability insurance accruals are recorded based on actuarial valuations and historical claims experience. The companys employee medical insurance accruals are recorded based on its medical claims processed as well as historical medical claims experience for claims incurred but not yet reported. The company maintains stop-loss coverage to limit the exposure to certain insurance-related risks. Differences in estimates and assumptions could result in an accrual requirement materially different from the calculated accrual. Historically, such differences have not been significant.
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The current portion of accrued expenses consists of the following:
Lease obligations and other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
The long-term portion of certain workers compensation and general liability accruals are discounted to their net present value based on expected loss payment patterns determined by independent actuaries using actual historical payments. Total discounted insurance liabilities for fiscal years ended 2010 and 2009 were $24.5 million, reflecting a 1.4 percent discount rate, and $25.1 million, reflecting a 1.5 percent discount rate, respectively. The following table represents a five year schedule for estimated future insurance liabilities:
A financial instrument is cash or a contract that imposes an obligation to deliver, or conveys a right to receive cash or another financial instrument. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable are considered to be representative of fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
price of the 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes (the Notes) at January 30, 2010 in the high yield debt market was approximately at par value. Accordingly, the fair value of the Notes approximated their carrying value of approximately $47.5 million.
In the normal course of business, the company employs established policies and procedures to manage exposure to changes in interest rates. The companys objective in managing the exposure to interest rate changes is to limit the volatility and impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. This is accomplished through the debt structure set in place in fiscal 2005, which consisted of the fixed rate Notes and the variable rate senior bank credit facility (the Credit Facility, and as amended in September 2008, the Amended Credit Facility), which is designed to be a working capital facility.
Fair Value Measurements
In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released new guidance which delayed the effective date to value all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) until the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset and liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a fair value hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The companys cash and cash equivalents represent the financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as