Kroger Company (KR)

2. GOODWILL

     The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2008, 2007 and 2006 did not result in impairment.

     The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance through January 31, 2009.

     In December 2008, the FASB issued FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8). FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 require additional disclosures about an entity’s involvement with variable interest entities and transfers of financial assets. Effective January 31, 2009, the Company has adopted FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8.

     In the first quarter of 2008, the Company made an investment in The Little Clinic LLC (“TLC”). TLC operates supermarket walk-in medical clinics in seven states, primarily in the Midwest and Southeast. At the date of investment, TLC was determined to be a variable-interest entity (“VIE”) under FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R), with the Company being the primary beneficiary. The Company was deemed the primary beneficiary due to its current ownership interest and half of its written put options being at a floor price. As a result, the Company consolidated TLC in accordance with FIN 46R. The minority interest was recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. The fair value of TLC was determined based on the amount of the investment made by the Company and the percentage acquired. The Company’s assessment of goodwill represents the excess of this amount over the fair value of TLC’s net assets as of the investment date. Creditors of TLC have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. Conversely, creditors of the Company have no recourse to the assets of TLC. In addition, if requested by TLC’s Board of Directors by January 1, 2010, the Company has agreed to make a pro rata portion of an additional capital contribution.

2.              GOODWILL

The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2007, 2006 and 2005 did not result in impairment.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance through February 2, 2008.

In the second quarter of 2007, the Company completed acquisitions of 18 Scott’s retail food stores in Northeast Indiana and 20 Farmer Jack retail food stores in Michigan for approximately $86. The transactions were recorded using the purchase method of accounting. Assets and liabilities were recorded based on fair values with the purchase prices being primarily allocated to inventory, property, plant and equipment and goodwill. The results of operations are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of acquisition.

The proforma effects of these acquisitions are not material to previously reported results.

2. GOODWILL

     The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2006 and 2005 did not result in impairment.

     The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2004 resulted in a $904 pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill at the Company’s Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions. The divisions’ operating performance suffered due to the intense competitive environment during the 2003 southern California labor dispute and recovery period after the labor dispute. The decreased operating performance was the result of the investments in personnel, training and price reductions necessary to help regain Ralphs’ business lost during the labor dispute. As a result of this decline and the decline in future expected operating performance, the divisions’ carrying value of goodwill exceeded its implied fair value resulting in the impairment charge. Most of the impairment charge was non-deductible for income tax purposes. At February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, the Company maintained $1,458 of goodwill for the Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions.

2. GOODWILL

     The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2006 and 2005 did not result in impairment.

     The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2004 resulted in a $904 pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill at the Company’s Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions. The divisions’ operating performance suffered due to the intense competitive environment during the 2003 southern California labor dispute and recovery period after the labor dispute. The decreased operating performance was the result of the investments in personnel, training and price reductions necessary to help regain Ralphs’ business lost during the labor dispute. As a result of this decline and the decline in future expected operating performance, the divisions’ carrying value of goodwill exceeded its implied fair value resulting in the impairment charge. Most of the impairment charge was non-deductible for income tax purposes. At February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, the Company maintained $1,458 of goodwill for the Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions.

     The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance through February 3, 2007.

4.          GOODWILL, NET

             The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2005 did not result in impairment.

             The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2004 resulted in a $904 pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill at the Company’s Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions. The divisions’ operating performance suffered due to the intense competitive environment during the 2003 southern California labor dispute and recovery period after the labor dispute. The decreased operating performance was the result of the investments in personnel, training and price reductions necessary to help regain Ralphs’ business lost during the labor dispute.  As a result of this decline and the decline in future expected operating performance, the divisions’ carrying value of goodwill exceeded its implied fair value resulting in the impairment charge. Most of the impairment charge was non-deductible for income tax purposes.  As of January 28, 2006, the Company maintained $1,458 of goodwill for the Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions.

             The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2003 resulted in a $471 non-cash impairment charge related to the goodwill at the Company’s Smith’s division.  In 2003, the Company’s Smith’s division experienced a substantial decline in operating performance when compared to prior year performance and budgeted 2003 results. Additionally, the Company forecasted a further decline in the future operating performance of the division reflecting the necessary investments in capital and targeted retail price reductions in order to maintain and grow market share and provide acceptable long-term return on capital. The impairment charge, which was non-deductible for income tax purposes, adjusted the carrying value of the division’s goodwill to its implied fair value.  As of January 28, 2006, the Company maintained $166 of goodwill for the Smith's division.

             The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance through January 28, 2006.

6. GOODWILL, NET

As described in Note 1, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on February 3, 2002. The transitional impairment review required by SFAS No. 142 resulted in a $26 pre-tax non-cash loss to write off the jewelry store division goodwill based on its implied fair value. Impairment primarily resulted from the recent operating performance of the division and review of the division’s projected future cash flows on a discounted basis, rather than on an undiscounted basis, as was the standard under SFAS No. 121, prior to adoption of SFAS No. 142. This loss was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, net of a $10 tax benefit, in the first quarter of 2002.

The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2003 resulted in a $471 non-cash impairment charge related to the goodwill at the Company’s Smith’s division. In 2003, the Company’s Smith’s division experienced a substantial decline in operating performance when compared to prior year performance and budgeted 2003 result. Additionally, the Company forecasted a further decline in the future operating performance of the division reflecting the necessary investments in capital and targeted retail price reductions in order to maintain and grow market share and provide acceptable long-term return on capital. The impairment charge, which was non-deductible for income tax purposes, adjusted the carrying value of the division’s goodwill to its implied fair value.

The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2004 resulted in a $904 pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill at the Company’s Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions. The divisions’ operating performance suffered due to the intense competitive environment during the 2003 southern California labor dispute and recovery period after the labor dispute. The decreased operating performance was the result of the investments in personnel, training, capital and price reductions necessary to help regain Ralphs’ business lost during the labor dispute and to maintain business gained by Food 4 Less that were not subject to the labor dispute. As a result of this decline and the decline in future expected operating performance, the divisions’ carrying value of goodwill exceeded its implied fair value resulting in the impairment charge. Most of the impairment charge was non-deductible for income tax purposes. After the impairment charge, the Company maintains $1,458 of goodwill for the Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance through January 29, 2005.

5. GOODWILL, NET

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance:

4. GOODWILL, NET

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s net goodwill balance:

5.    GOODWILL, NET

As described in Note 1, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on February 3, 2002. The transitional impairment review required by SFAS No. 142 resulted in a $26 pre-tax non-cash loss to write off the jewelry store division goodwill based on its implied fair value. Impairment primarily resulted from the recent operating performance of the division and review of the division’s projected future cash flows on a discounted basis, rather than on an undiscounted basis, as was the standard under SFAS No. 121, prior to adoption of SFAS No. 142. This loss was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, net of a $10 tax benefit, in the first quarter of 2002.

The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2003 resulted in a $444 non-cash impairment charge related to the goodwill at the Company’s Smith’s division. In 2003, the Company’s Smith’s division experienced a substantial decline in operating performance when compared to prior year performance and budgeted 2003 result. Additionally, the Company forecasted a further decline in the future operating performance of the division reflecting the necessary investments in capital and targeted retail price reductions in order to maintain and grow market share and provide acceptable long-term return on capital. The impairment charge, which was non-deductible for income tax purposes, adjusted the carrying value of the division’s goodwill to its implied fair value.

The annual evaluation of goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2004 resulted in a $900 pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill at the Company’s Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions. The divisions’ operating performance suffered due to the intense competitive environment during the 2003 southern California labor dispute and recovery period after the labor dispute. The decreased operating performance was the result of the investments in personnel, training, capital and price reductions necessary to help regain Ralphs’ business lost during the labor dispute and to maintain business gained by Food 4 Less that were not subject to the labor dispute. As a result of this decline and the decline in future expected operating performance, the divisions’ carrying value of goodwill exceeded its implied fair value resulting in the impairment charge. Most of the impairment charge was non-deductible for income tax purposes. After the impairment charge, the Company maintains $1,458 of goodwill for the Ralphs and Food 4 Less divisions.