|
|
 | | | |
- close
- close
- close
- close
This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed Nov 6, 2009. Patent infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin; however, on May 30, 2007, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. countersued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; however, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Company’s motion to transfer. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the above matters. This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed Jul 29, 2009. Patent infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin; however, on May 30, 2007, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. countersued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; however, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Company’s motion to transfer. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the above matters. This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed May 15, 2009. Patent infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Controlling Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued the Controlling Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin; however, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Controlling Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. countersued the Controlling Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; however, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Controlling Company’s motion to transfer. The Controlling Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the above matters.
Table of ContentsLG DISPLAY CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed Mar 31, 2009. Patent infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin; however, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. countersued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; however, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Company’s motion to transfer. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the above matters. This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed Mar 4, 2009. Patent infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin; however, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. countersued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; however, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Company’s motion to transfer. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the above matters. This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed Nov 12, 2008. Patent Infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp., alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, but the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. countersued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, but, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Company’s motion to transfer.
Table of ContentsLG DISPLAY CO., LTD. (Formerly, LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd.) AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) September 30, 2007 and 2008
This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed Aug 14, 2008. Patent Infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corp., alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, but the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co. countersued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, but, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Company’s motion to transfer. This excerpt taken from the LPL 6-K filed May 15, 2008. Patent Infringement lawsuit against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. and others On December 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint against Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp., Tatung Company and ViewSonic Corp., alleging patent infringement related to liquid crystal display and manufacturing process for TFT-LCDs in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 8, 2007, AU Optronics Corp. countersued
77
Table of ContentsLG DISPLAY CO., LTD. (Formerly, LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd.) AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) March 31, 2007 and 2008
the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, but the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware due to the Company’s motion to transfer. On May 4, 2007, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co. countersued the Company for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, but, on March 31, 2008, the suit was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware according to the Company’s motion to transfer. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||
