This excerpt taken from the LDIS 10-K filed Mar 25, 2005.
This annual report on Form 10-K, as well as our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, are publicly available on our website (leadis.com) without charge immediately following our filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, a copy of this annual report is available without charge upon written request to: Investor Relations, Leadis Technology, Inc., 800 W. California Avenue, Suite 200, Sunnyvale, California 94086.
Our executive and administrative headquarters occupy approximately 11,840 square feet of a facility located in Sunnyvale, California, under a lease that expires in June 2010. In addition, we lease approximately 14,367 square feet in a facility in Korea under two leases, one that expires in June 2005 and one that expires in March 2006. This facility houses our primary engineering operations. We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current needs and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate our foreseeable expansion of operations. For additional information regarding obligations under leases, see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the subheading Operating leases, which information is hereby incorporated by reference.
On March 2, 2005, a purported securities class action suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Leadis Technology, Inc., certain of its officers and its directors. The complaint alleges the defendants violated Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 by making allegedly false and misleading statements in the companys registration statement and prospectus filed on June 16, 2004 for our initial public offering. The complaint seeks unspecified damages on behalf of a class of purchasers that acquired shares of our common stock pursuant to our registration statement and prospectus. The claims appear to be based on allegations that at the time of the IPO demand for the companys OLED products was already slowing and that the company failed to disclose that it was engaging in overshipments of its OLED product. We anticipate that similar additional actions may be filed in the future. The lawsuit is still in the preliminary stages, and it is not possible for us to quantify the extent of potential liability, if any.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.