Annual Reports

 
Quarterly Reports

  • 10-Q (Nov 7, 2017)
  • 10-Q (Aug 2, 2017)
  • 10-Q (May 9, 2017)
  • 10-Q (Oct 25, 2016)
  • 10-Q (Aug 2, 2016)
  • 10-Q (Apr 27, 2016)

 
8-K

 
Other

Mack-Cali Realty 10-Q 2010

Documents found in this filing:

  1. 10-Q
  2. Ex-31.1
  3. Ex-31.2
  4. Ex-32.1
  5. Ex-32.1
form10qcorp.htm
 
 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

or

[  ]           TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE>
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from
                                                           to

Commission File Number:
1-13274

 
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland
 
 22-3305147
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     

343 Thornall Street, Edison, New Jersey
 
08837-2206
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

 
(732) 590-1000
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.  YES X NO ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ___ No ___ (the Registrant is not yet required to submit Interactive Data)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer  x                                                                                                           Accelerated filer  ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                                                                                                                                Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES___  NO   X 

As of April 26, 2010, there were 79,291,317 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

 
 

 


MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

 
 
Part I
Financial Information
 
Page
       
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited):
 
       
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010
 
   
     and December 31, 2009
4
       
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months
 
   
     ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
5
       
   
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the three months
 
   
     ended March 31, 2010
6
       
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months
 
   
     ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
7
       
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8-36
       
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
 
   
     and Results of Operations
37-51
       
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
51-52
       
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
52
       
Part II
Other Information
   
       
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
53
       
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
53
       
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
54
       
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
54
       
 
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)
54
       
 
Item 5.
Other Information
55
       
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
55
       
Signatures
   
56
       
Exhibit Index
   
57-73

 

 
2

 


MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

Part I – Financial Information


Item 1.        Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, of changes in equity, and of cash flows and related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods.

The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the aforementioned financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto included in Mack-Cali Realty Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.

 
3

 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS> (in thousands, except per share amounts)

   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
ASSETS
 
2010
   
2009
 
Rental property
           
Land and leasehold interests
  $ 772,403     $ 771,794  
Buildings and improvements
    3,952,119       3,948,509  
Tenant improvements
    442,133       456,547  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    9,349       9,358  
      5,176,004       5,186,208  
Less – accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (1,170,810 )     (1,153,223 )
Net investment in rental property
    4,005,194       4,032,985  
Cash and cash equivalents
    274,066       291,059  
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
    35,510       35,680  
Unbilled rents receivable, net
    121,633       119,469  
Deferred charges and other assets, net
    214,002       213,674  
Restricted cash
    21,854       20,681  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
               
of $2,434 and $2,036
    12,046       8,089  
                 
Total assets
  $ 4,684,305     $ 4,721,637  
                 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
Senior unsecured notes
  $ 1,582,695     $ 1,582,434  
Mortgages, loans payable and other obligations
    754,235       755,003  
Dividends and distributions payable
    42,121       42,109  
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    111,355       106,878  
Rents received in advance and security deposits
    51,681       54,693  
Accrued interest payable
    22,512       37,330  
Total liabilities
    2,564,599       2,578,447  
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Equity:
               
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 10,000
               
and 10,000 shares outstanding, at liquidation preference
    25,000       25,000  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 190,000,000 shares authorized,
               
79,184,996 and 78,969,752 shares outstanding
    791       789  
Additional paid-in capital
    2,281,115       2,275,716  
Dividends in excess of net earnings
    (491,216 )     (470,047 )
Total Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity
    1,815,690       1,831,458  
                 
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries:
               
Operating Partnership
    300,882       308,703  
Consolidated joint ventures
    3,134       3,029  
Total noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
    304,016       311,732  
                 
Total equity
    2,119,706       2,143,190  
                 
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 4,684,305     $ 4,721,637  
                 
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 

 
4

 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS> (in thousands, except per share amounts)

   
Three Months Ended
 
   
March 31,
 
REVENUES
 
2010
   
2009
 
Base rents
  $ 153,785     $ 149,326  
Escalations and recoveries from tenants
    26,353       27,949  
Construction services
    10,862       3,911  
Real estate services
    1,976       2,526  
Other income
    2,917       2,954  
Total revenues
    195,893       186,666  
                 
EXPENSES
               
Real estate taxes
    22,337       23,471  
Utilities
    20,012       20,877  
Operating services
    28,993       27,942  
Direct construction costs
    10,293       3,714  
General and administrative
    8,414       10,082  
Depreciation and amortization
    48,597       48,272  
Total expenses
    138,646       134,358  
Operating income
    57,247       52,308  
                 
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
               
Interest expense
    (39,369 )     (32,794 )
Interest and other investment income
    21       197  
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
    (522 )     (5,114 )
Total other (expense) income
    (39,870 )     (37,711 )
Income from continuing operations
    17,377       14,597  
Net income
    17,377       14,597  
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
    87       632  
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
    (2,455 )     (2,628 )
Preferred stock dividends
    (500 )     (500 )
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 14,509     $ 12,101  
                 
Basic earnings per common share:
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.18     $ 0.18  
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 0.18     $ 0.18  
                 
Diluted earnings per common share:
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.18     $ 0.18  
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 0.18     $ 0.18  
                 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    78,973       66,484  
                 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    92,450       80,921  
                 
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 

 
5

 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY >(in thousands)

             
             
     
Additional
Dividends in
Noncontrolling
 
 
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Paid-In
Excess of
Interests
Total
 
Shares
Amount
Shares
Par Value
Capital
Net Earnings
in Subsidiaries
Equity
Balance at January 1, 2010
10
$25,000
78,970
$789
$2,275,716
$(470,047)
$311,732
$2,143,190
Net income
--
--
--
--
--
15,009
2,368
17,377
Preferred stock dividends
--
--
--
--
--
(500)
--
(500)
Common stock dividends
--
--
--
--
--
(35,678)
--
(35,678)
Common unit distributions
--
--
--
--
--
--
(5,942)
(5,942)
Increase in noncontrolling
               
  interests
--
--
--
--
--
--
192
192
Redemption of common units
               
  for common stock
--
--
190
2
4,343
--
(4,345)
--
Shares issued under Dividend
               
  Reinvestment and Stock
               
  Purchase Plan
--
--
1
--
40
--
--
40
Stock options exercised
--
--
11
--
311
--
--
311
Stock Compensation
--
--
13
--
716
--
--
716
Rebalancing of ownership
               
  percent between parent
               
  and subsidiaries
--
--
--
--
(11)
--
11
--
Balance at March 31, 2010
10
$25,000
79,185
$791
$2,281,115
$(491,216)
$304,016
$2,119,706


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
6

 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS> (in thousands)

   
Three Months Ended
 
   
March 31,
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
2010
   
2009
 
Net income
  $ 17,377     $ 14,597  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
               
Operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization, including related intangible assets
    48,251       46,737  
Amortization of stock compensation
    716       517  
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount
    715       707  
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint venture, net
    522       5,114  
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated
               
   joint ventures
    48       1,000  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Increase in unbilled rents receivable, net
    (2,136 )     (992 )
Increase in deferred charges and other assets, net
    (8,554 )     (3,192 )
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net
    (3,956 )     12,009  
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses
               
   and other liabilities
    5,887       (9,395 )
Decrease in rents received in advance and security deposits
    (3,012 )     (1,436 )
Decrease in accrued interest payable
    (14,818 )     (13,637 )
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 41,040     $ 52,029  
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Additions to rental property and related intangibles
  $ (11,862 )   $ (15,791 )
Repayment of notes receivable
    --       44  
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
    (393 )     (1,580 )
Increase in restricted cash
    (1,173 )     (199 )
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (13,428 )   $ (17,526 )
                 
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Borrowings from revolving credit facility
    --     $ 265,000  
Repayment of revolving credit facility and money market loans
    --       (98,000 )
Repayments of senior unsecured notes
    --       (199,724 )
Proceeds from mortgages and loans payable
    --       64,500  
Repayment of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations
  $ (1,956 )     (3,378 )
Payment of financing costs
    (851 )     (375 )
Proceeds from stock options exercised
    311       --  
Payment of dividends and distributions
    (42,109 )     (52,249 )
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
  $ (44,605 )   $ (24,226 )
                 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (16,993 )   $ 10,277  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    291,059       21,621  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 274,066     $ 31,898  
                 
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 

 
7

 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

1.      ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

ORGANIZATION
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), is a fully-integrated, self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) providing leasing, management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its properties and third parties.  As of March 31, 2010, the Company owned or had interests in 288 properties plus developable land (collectively, the “Properties”).  The Properties aggregate approximately 33.1 million square feet, which are comprised of 276 buildings, primarily office and office/flex buildings totaling approximately 32.7 million square feet (which include 19 buildings, primarily office buildings aggregating approximately 2.1 million square feet owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests), six industrial/warehouse buildings totaling approximately 387,400 square feet, two retail properties totaling approximately 17,300 square feet, one hotel (which is owned by an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company has an investment interest) and three parcels of land leased to others.  The Properties are located in five states, primarily in the Northeast, plus the District of Columbia.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which consist principally of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), and variable interest entities for which the Company has determined itself to be the primary beneficiary, if any.  See Note 2:  Significant Accounting Policies – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures for the Company’s treatment of unconsolidated joint venture interests.  Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform with current period presentation.

On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, also known as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105-10, General Accepted Accounting Principles, (“ASC 105-10”).  ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.  Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.  All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative.  Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts.  Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.  GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented.  The Company has implemented the Codification by providing references to the Codification topics, as appropriate.


 
8

 

2.      SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Rental
Property
Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Costs directly related to the acquisition, development and construction of rental properties are capitalized. Pursuant to the Company’s adoption of ASC 805, Business Combinations, effective January 1, 2009, acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.  Capitalized development and construction costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development and construction costs, interest, property taxes, insurance, salaries and other project costs incurred during the period of development.  Included in total rental property is construction, tenant improvement and development in-progress of $49,284,000 and $107,226,000 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.  Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.  Fully-depreciated assets are removed from the accounts.

The Company considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity (as distinguished from activities such as routine maintenance and cleanup).  If portions of a rental project are substantially completed and occupied by tenants, or held available for occupancy, and other portions have not yet reached that stage, the substantially completed portions are accounted for as a separate project.  The Company allocates costs incurred between the portions under construction and the portions substantially completed and held available for occupancy, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portion under construction.

Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The estimated useful lives are as follows:

Leasehold interests
Remaining lease term
Buildings and improvements
5 to 40 years
Tenant improvements
The shorter of the term of the
 
related lease or useful life
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
5 to 10 years

Upon acquisition of rental property, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships.  The Company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.  The Company records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction.  In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value, (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.
 
 
 
9

 

 
Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant.  Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases.  In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions.  In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.  Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Company’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.  The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.  The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s real estate properties held for use may be impaired.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property.  The Company’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved.

Rental Property
 
Held for Sale and
 
Discontinued
 
Operations
When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets.  If, in management’s opinion, the estimated net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established.  Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used.  A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.

Investments in
Unconsolidated
Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.  The Company applies the equity method by initially recording these investments at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions.
 
 
 
10

 

 
 
ASC 810, Consolidation, provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIE (the “primary beneficiary”).  Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either (1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest, (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.
 
 
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the updated provisions of ASC 810, pursuant to FASB No. 167, which amends FIN 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.  Additionally, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46(R) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, which was based on determining which enterprise absorbs the majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both.  FASB No. 167 amends certain guidance in Interpretation 46(R) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity.  Also, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46(R) to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity.  The enhanced disclosures are required for any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to these financial statements.  See Note 3: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures for disclosures regarding the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures.
 
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired.  An investment is impaired only if management’s estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the value of the investment.  The Company’s estimates of value for each investment (particularly in commercial real estate joint ventures) are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and operating costs.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the values estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be realized.  See Note 3: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.

Cash and Cash
 
Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.

Marketable
 
Securities
The Company classifies its marketable securities among three categories: held-to-maturity, trading and available-for-sale.  Unrealized holding gains and losses relating to available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as other comprehensive income (loss) in equity until realized.  A decline in the market value of any held-to-maturity marketable security below cost that is deemed to be other than temporary results in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value.  Any impairment would be charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security established.

The fair value of the marketable securities is determined using level I inputs under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  Level I inputs represent quoted prices available in an active market for identical investments as of the reporting date.


 
11

 

Deferred
Financing Costs
Costs incurred in obtaining financing are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related indebtedness. Amortization of such costs is included in interest expense and was $715,000 and $707,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.


Deferred
Leasing Costs
Costs incurred in connection with leases are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases and included in depreciation and amortization.  Unamortized deferred leasing costs are charged to amortization expense upon early termination of the lease. Certain employees of the Company are compensated for providing leasing services to the Properties.  The portion of such compensation, which is capitalized and amortized, approximated $955,000 and $860,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Derivative
Instruments
The Company measures derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, at fair value and records them as an asset or liability, depending on the Company’s rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract.  For derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item are recorded in earnings.  For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the derivative are reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the affected period.

Revenue
Recognition
Base rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases.  Unbilled rents receivable represents the amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with the lease agreements.  Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases.  The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.  Escalations and recoveries from tenants are received from tenants for certain costs as provided in the lease agreements.  These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance and other recoverable costs.  See Note 11: Tenant Leases.  Construction services revenue includes fees earned and reimbursements received by the Company for providing construction management and general contractor services to clients.  Construction services revenue is recognized on the percentage of completion method.  Using this method, profits are recorded on the basis of estimates of the overall profit and percentage of completion of individual contracts.  A portion of the estimated profits is accrued based upon estimates of the percentage of completion of the construction contract.  This revenue recognition method involves inherent risks relating to profit and cost estimates.  Real estate services revenue includes property management, facilities management, leasing commission fees and other services, and payroll and related costs reimbursed from clients.  Other income includes income from parking spaces leased to tenants, income from tenants for additional services arranged for by the Company and income from tenants for early lease terminations.
 
 
 
 
12

 

 
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
Management periodically performs a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if accounts receivable balances are impaired based on factors affecting the collectability of those balances.  Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to exercise significant judgment about the timing, frequency and severity of collection losses, which affects the allowance and net income.

Income and
Other Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).  As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate federal income tax (including alternative minimum tax) on net income that it currently distributes to its shareholders, provided that the Company satisfies certain organizational and operational requirements including the requirement to distribute at least 90 percent of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders.  The Company has elected to treat certain of its corporate subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries (each a “TRS”).  In general, a TRS of the Company may perform additional services for tenants of the Company and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business (except for the operation or management of health care facilities or lodging facilities or the providing to any person, under a franchise, license or otherwise, rights to any brand name under which any lodging facility or health care facility is operated).  A TRS is subject to corporate federal income tax.  If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.  The Company is subject to certain state and local taxes.

The Company adopted the amended provisions related to uncertain tax provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007.  As a result of the implementation of the guidance, the Company recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment.  The Company expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which is included in general and administrative expense.

In the normal course of business, the Company or one of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local jurisdictions in which it operates, where applicable.  As of March 31, 2010, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under the statute of limitations are generally from the year 2005 forward.

Earnings
 
Per Share
The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”).  Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower EPS amount.

Dividends and
 
Distributions
Payable
The dividends and distributions payable at March 31, 2010 represents dividends payable to preferred shareholders (10,000 shares) and common shareholders (79,285,190 shares), and distributions payable to noncontrolling interest common unitholders of the Operating Partnership (13,205,106 common units) for all such holders of record as of April 6, 2010 with respect to the first quarter 2010.  The first quarter 2010 preferred stock dividends of $50.00 per share, common stock dividends and common unit distributions of $0.45 per common share and unit were approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 2010.  The common stock dividends and common unit distributions payable were paid on April 12, 2010.  The preferred stock dividends payable were paid on April 15, 2010.
 
 
 
 
13

 

 
The dividends and distributions payable at December 31, 2009 represents dividends payable to preferred shareholders (10,000 shares) and common shareholders (78,969,858 shares), and distributions payable to noncontrolling interest common unitholders of the Operating Partnership (13,495,036 common units) for all such holders of record as of January 6, 2010 with respect to the fourth quarter 2009.  The fourth quarter 2009 preferred stock dividends of $50.00 per share, common stock dividends and common unit distributions of $0.45 per common share and unit were approved by the Board of Directors on December 8, 2009.  The common stock dividends, common unit distributions and preferred stock dividends payable were paid on January 15, 2010.

Costs Incurred
 
For Stock
 
Issuances
Costs incurred in connection with the Company’s stock issuances are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

Stock
 
Compensation
The Company accounts for stock options and restricted stock awards granted prior to 2002 using the intrinsic value method prescribed in the previously existing accounting guidance on accounting for stock issued to employees.  Under this guidance, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the option granted.  Compensation cost for stock options is recognized ratably over the vesting period.  The Company’s policy is to grant options with an exercise price equal to the quoted closing market price of the Company’s stock on the business day preceding the grant date.  Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized under the Company’s stock option plans for the granting of stock options made prior to 2002.  Restricted stock awards granted prior to 2002 are valued at the vesting dates of such awards with compensation cost for such awards recognized ratably over the vesting period.

In 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation.  In 2006, the Company adopted the amended guidance, which did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.  These provisions require that the estimated fair value of restricted stock (“Restricted Stock Awards”) and stock options at the grant date be amortized ratably into expense over the appropriate vesting period.  The Company recorded restricted stock expense of $616,000, and $517,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Other
 
Comprehensive
 
Income
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes items that are recorded in equity, such as unrealized holding gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale.


3.      INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES

The debt of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures generally is non-recourse to the Company, except for customary exceptions pertaining to such matters as intentional misuse of funds, environmental conditions and material misrepresentations, and except as otherwise indicated below.

PLAZA VIII AND IX ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
Plaza VIII and IX Associates, L.L.C. is a joint venture between the Company and Columbia Development Company, L.L.C. (“Columbia”), which owns land for future development, located on the Hudson River waterfront in Jersey City, New Jersey, adjacent to the Company’s Harborside Financial Center office complex.  The Company and Columbia each hold a 50 percent interest in the venture.  The venture owns undeveloped land currently used as a parking facility.
 
 
 
14

 

 
SOUTH PIER AT HARBORSIDE – HOTEL
The Company has a joint venture with Hyatt Corporation (“Hyatt”) which owns a 350-room hotel on the South Pier at Harborside Financial Center, Jersey City, New Jersey.  The Company owns a 50 percent interest in the venture.

The venture has a mortgage loan with a balance as of March 31, 2010 of $67.0 million collateralized by the hotel property.  The loan carries an interest rate of 6.15 percent and matures in November 2016.  The venture has a loan with a balance as of March 31, 2010 of $6.3 million with the City of Jersey City, provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.  The loan currently bears interest at fixed rates ranging from 6.09 percent to 6.62 percent and matures in August 2020.  The Company has posted a $6.3 million letter of credit in support of this loan, half of which is indemnified by Hyatt.

RED BANK CORPORATE PLAZA
The Company has a joint venture with The PRC Group, which owns Red Bank Corporate Plaza, a 92,878 square foot office building located in Red Bank, New Jersey.  The property is fully leased to Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. through September 30, 2017.  The Company holds a 50 percent interest in the venture.

The venture has a $22.0 million loan with a commercial bank collateralized by the office property.  The loan (with a balance as of March 31, 2010 of $20.7 million), carries an interest rate of LIBOR plus 125 basis points and matures in April 2011.  On January 26, 2010, the venture sold a vacant land parcel it had owned for approximately $1.7 million.

The Company performs management, leasing and other services for the property owned by the joint venture and recognized $24,000 and $23,000 in fees for such services during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

MACK-GREEN-GALE LLC/GRAMERCY AGREEMENT
On May 9, 2006, the Company entered into a joint venture, Mack-Green-Gale LLC and subsidiaries (“Mack-Green”), with SL Green, pursuant to which Mack-Green held an approximate 96 percent interest in and acted as general partner of Gale SLG NJ Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OPLP”).  The Company’s acquisition cost for its interest in Mack-Green was approximately $125 million, which was funded primarily through borrowing under the Company’s revolving credit facility.  At the time, the OPLP owned 100 percent of entities (“Property Entities”) which owned 25 office properties (the “OPLP Properties”) which aggregated 3.5 million square feet (consisting of 17 office properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet located in New Jersey and eight properties aggregating 1.2 million square feet located in Troy, Michigan).  In December 2007, the OPLP sold its eight properties located in Troy, Michigan for $83.5 million.  The venture recognized a loss of approximately $22.3 million from the sale.

As defined in the Mack-Green operating agreement, the Company shared decision-making equally with SL Green regarding:  (i) all major decisions involving the operations of Mack-Green; and (ii) overall general partner responsibilities in operating the OPLP.

The Mack-Green operating agreement generally provided for profits and losses to be allocated as follows:

 
(i)
99 percent of Mack-Green’s share of the profits and losses from 10 specific OPLP Properties allocable to the Company and one percent allocable to SL Green;
 
(ii)
one percent of Mack-Green’s share of the profits and losses from eight specific OPLP Properties and its minor interest in four office properties allocable to the Company and 99 percent allocable to SL Green; and
 
(iii)
50 percent of all other profits and losses allocable to the Company and 50 percent allocable to SL Green.

Substantially all of the OPLP Properties were encumbered by mortgage loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $276.3 million at March 31, 2009.  $185.0 million of the mortgage loans bore interest at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 6.26 percent per annum and matured at various times through May 2016.

Six of the OPLP Properties (the “Portfolio Properties”) were encumbered by $90.3 million of mortgage loans which bore interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points per annum and were scheduled to mature in May 2009. The floating rate mortgage loans were provided to the six entities which owned the Portfolio Properties (collectively, the “Portfolio Entities”) by Gramercy, which was a related party of SL Green.  Based on the venture’s anticipated holding period pertaining to the Portfolio Properties, the venture believed that the carrying amounts of these properties may not have been recoverable at December 31, 2008.  Accordingly, as the venture determined that its carrying value of these properties exceeded the estimated fair value, it recorded an impairment charge of approximately $32.3 million as of December 31, 2008. 
 
 
 
 
15

 

 
On April 29, 2009, the Company acquired the remaining interests in Mack-Green from SL Green.  As a result, the Company owns 100 percent of Mack-Green.  Additionally, on April 29, the mortgage loans with Gramercy on the Portfolio Properties (the “Gramercy Agreement”) were modified to provide for, among other things, interest to accrue at the current rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis point per annum, with the interest pay rate capped at 3.15 percent per annum.  Under the Gramercy Agreement, the payment of debt service is subordinate to the payment of operating expenses.  Interest at the pay rate is payable only out of funds generated by the Portfolio Properties and only to the extent that the Portfolio Properties’ operating expenses have been paid, with any accrued unpaid interest above the pay rate serving to increase the balance of the amounts due at the termination of the agreement.  Any excess funds after payment of debt service generally will be escrowed and available for future capital and leasing costs, as well as to cover future cash flow shortfalls, as appropriate.  The Gramercy Agreement terminates on May 9, 2011.  Approximately six months in advance of the end of the term of the Gramercy Agreement, the Portfolio Entities are to provide estimates of each property’s fair market value (“FMV”).  Gramercy has the right to accept or reject the FMV.  If Gramercy rejects the FMV, Gramercy must market the property for sale in cooperation with the Portfolio Entities and must approve the ultimate sale.  However, Gramercy has no obligation to market a Portfolio Property if the FMV is less than the allocated amount due, including accrued, unpaid interest. If any Portfolio Property is not sold, the Portfolio Entities have agreed to give a deed in lieu of foreclosure, unless the FMV was equal to or greater than the allocated amount due for such Portfolio Property, in which case they can elect to have that Portfolio Property released by paying the FMV.  If Gramercy accepts the FMV, the Portfolio Property will be released from the Gramercy Agreement upon payment of the FMV.  Under the direction of Gramercy, the Company continues to perform management, leasing, and construction services for the Portfolio Properties at market terms.  The Portfolio Entities have a participation interest which provides for sharing 50 percent of any amount realized in excess of the allocated amounts due for each Portfolio Property.

As the Company acquired SL Green’s interests in Mack-Green, the Company owns 100 percent of Mack-Green and is consolidating Mack-Green as of the closing date.  Mack-Green, in turn, has been and will continue consolidating the OPLP as Mack-Green’s approximate 96 percent, general partner ownership interest in the OPLP remained unchanged as of the closing date.  Additionally, as of the closing date, the OPLP continues to consolidate its Property Entities which own 11 office properties aggregating 1.5 million square feet as its 100-percent ownership and rights regarding these entities were unchanged in the transaction.  The OPLP will not be consolidating the Portfolio Entities that own six office properties, aggregating 786,198 square feet, as the Gramercy Agreement is considered a reconsideration event under the provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation, and accordingly, the Portfolio Entities were deemed to be variable interest entities for which the OPLP was not considered the primary beneficiary based on the Gramercy Agreement as described above.  As a result of the SLG Transactions, the Company has an unconsolidated joint venture interest in the Portfolio Properties.

On March 31, 2010, the venture sold one of its unconsolidated Portfolio Properties subject to the Gramercy Agreement, 1280 Wall Street West, a 121,314 square foot office property, located in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, for approximately $13.9 million, which was primarily used to pay down mortgage loans pursuant to the Gramercy Agreement.

The Company performs management, leasing, and construction services for properties owned by the unconsolidated joint ventures and recognized $233,000 and $1.1 million in income (net of $0 and $790,000 in direct costs) for such services in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

GE/GALE FUNDING LLC (PFV)
The Gale agreement signed as part of the Gale/Green transactions in May 2006 provides for the Company to acquire certain ownership interests in real estate projects (the “Non-Portfolio Properties”), subject to obtaining certain third party consents and the satisfaction of various project-related and/or other conditions.  Each of the Company’s acquired interests in the Non-Portfolio Properties provide for the initial distributions of net cash flow solely to the Company, and thereafter an affiliate of Mr. Gale (“Gale Affiliate”) has participation rights (“Gale Participation Rights”) in 50 percent of the excess net cash flow remaining after the distribution to the Company of the aggregate amount equal to the sum of: (a) the Company’s capital contributions, plus (b) an internal rate of return (“IRR”) of 10 percent per annum, accruing on the date or dates of the Company’s investments.
 
 
 
16

 

 
On May 9, 2006, as part of the Gale/Green transactions, the Company acquired from a Gale Affiliate for $1.8 million a 50 percent controlling interest in GMW Village Associates, LLC (“GMW Village”).  The Company consolidates GMV Village, which includes accounts for investments in unconsolidated joint venture and noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint ventures, with any profit and loss recorded in equity in earnings (loss) and noncontrolling interests.  GMW Village holds a 20 percent interest in GE/Gale Funding LLC (“GE Gale”).  GE Gale owns a 100 percent interest in the entity owning Princeton Forrestal Village, a mixed-use, office/retail complex aggregating 527,015 square feet and located in Plainsboro, New Jersey (“Princeton Forrestal Village” or “PFV”).

In addition to the cash consideration paid to acquire the interest, the Company provided a Gale affiliate with the Gale Participation Rights.

The operating agreement of GE Gale, which is owned 80 percent by GEBAM, Inc., provides for, among other things, distributions of net cash flow, initially, in proportion to each member’s interest and subject to adjustment upon achievement of certain financial goals, as defined in the operating agreement.

GE Gale has a mortgage loan with a balance of $50.7 million at March 31, 2010.  The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points and matures on January 9, 2011.

The Company performs management, leasing, and other services for PFV and recognized $408,000 and $223,000 in income for such services in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

ROUTE 93 MASTER LLC (“Route 93 Participant”)/ROUTE 93 BEDFORD MASTER LLC (with the Route 93 Participant, collectively, the “Route 93 Venture”)
On June 1, 2006, the Route 93 Venture was formed between the Route 93 Participant, a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, having a 30 percent interest and the Commingled Pension Trust Fund (Special Situation Property) of JPMorgan Chase Bank having a 70 percent interest, for the purpose of acquiring seven office buildings, aggregating 666,697 square feet, located in the towns of Andover, Bedford and Billerica, Massachusetts.  Profits and losses were shared by the partners in proportion to their respective interests until the investment yielded an 11 percent IRR, then sharing shifted to 40/60, and when the IRR reached 15 percent, then sharing shifted to 50/50.  The Route 93 Participant is a joint venture between the Company and a Gale affiliate.  Profits and losses were shared by the partners under this venture in proportion to their respective interests (83.3/16.7) until the investment yielded an 11 percent IRR, then sharing shifted to 50/50.

On March 31, 2009, on account of the deterioration at the time in the commercial real estate markets in the Boston area, the Company wrote off its investment in the venture and recorded an impairment charge in equity in earnings (loss) of $4.0 million (of which $0.6 million was attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures) during the period.  The Route 93 Ventures had a mortgage loan with a $44.2 million balance at September 1, 2009 collateralized by its office properties.  The loan bore interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 220 basis points and was scheduled to mature on July 11, 2009.  On September 2, 2009, the venture transferred the deeds to the lender in satisfaction of its obligations.

GALE KIMBALL, L.L.C.
On June 15, 2006, the Company entered into a joint venture with a Gale Affiliate to form M-C Kimball, LLC (“M-C Kimball”).  M-C Kimball was formed for the sole purpose of acquiring a Gale Affiliate’s 33.33 percent membership interest in Gale Kimball, L.L.C. (“Gale Kimball”), an entity holding a 25 percent interest in 100 Kimball Drive LLC (“100 Kimball”), which developed and placed in service a 175,000 square foot office property that is leased to a single tenant, located at 100 Kimball Drive, Parsippany, New Jersey (the “Kimball Property”).

The operating agreement of M-C Kimball provides, among other things, for the Gale Participation Rights (of which Mark Yeager, a former Executive Vice President of the Company, has a direct 26 percent interest).

Gale Kimball is owned 33.33 percent by M-C Kimball and 66.67 percent by the Hampshire Generational Fund, L.L.C. (“Hampshire”).  The operating agreement of Gale Kimball provides, among other things, for the distribution of net cash flow, initially, in accordance with its members’ respective membership interests and, upon achievement of certain financial conditions, 50 percent to each of the Company and Hampshire.
 
 
 
17

 

 
100 Kimball is owned 25 percent by Gale Kimball and 75 percent by 100 Kimball Drive Realty Member LLC, an affiliate of JPMorgan (“JPM”). The operating agreement of 100 Kimball provides, among other things, for the distributions to be made in the following order:

(i)  
first, to JPM, such that JPM is provided with an annual 12 percent compound preferred return on Preferred Equity Capital Contributions (as such term is defined in the operating agreement of 100 Kimball and largely comprised of development and construction costs);
(ii)  
second, to JPM, as return of Preferred Equity Capital Contributions until complete repayment of such Preferred Equity Capital Contributions;
(iii)  
third, to each of JPM and Gale Kimball in proportion to their respective membership interests until each member is provided, as a result of such distributions, with an annual twelve percent compound return on the Member’s Capital Contributions (as defined in the operating agreement of 100 Kimball, and excluding Preferred Equity Capital Contributions, if any); and
(iv)  
fourth, 50 percent to each of JPM and Gale Kimball.

On September 21, 2007, 100 Kimball obtained a $47 million mortgage loan which bore interest at a rate of 5.95 percent and was scheduled to mature in September 2012.  On December 30, 2009 the venture paid the lender $40 million to satisfy the debt and recorded a gain of $7.0 million (of which the Company’s share of $579,000 is included in equity in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009).  Concurrently, 100 Kimball obtained a $32 million mortgage loan that bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 400 basis points and matures on January 10, 2013 with two one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions and payment of a fee.  LIBOR is defined as the greater of (i) 1.50%, and (ii) the rate of interest per annum reported as the thirty day London Interbank Offered Rate.

The Company performs management, leasing, and other services for the property owned by 100 Kimball for which it recognized $70,500 and $55,000 in income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

12 VREELAND ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
On September 8, 2006, the Company entered into a joint venture with a Gale Affiliate to form M-C Vreeland, LLC (“M-C Vreeland”).  M-C Vreeland was formed for the sole purpose of acquiring a Gale Affiliate’s 50 percent membership interest in 12 Vreeland Associates, L.L.C., an entity owning an office property located at 12 Vreeland Road, Florham Park, New Jersey.

The operating agreement of M-C Vreeland provides, among other things, for the Gale Participation Rights (of which Mr. Yeager has a direct 15 percent interest).

The office property at 12 Vreeland is a 139,750 square foot office building.  The property is subject to a fully-amortizing mortgage loan, which matures on July 1, 2012, and bears interest at 6.9 percent per annum.  As of March 31, 2010 the outstanding balance on the mortgage note was $4.7 million.

Under the operating agreement of 12 Vreeland Associates, L.L.C., M-C Vreeland has a 50 percent interest, with S/K Florham Park Associates, L.L.C. (the managing member) and its affiliate holding the other 50 percent.

BOSTON-DOWNTOWN CROSSING
On October 20, 2006, the Company formed a joint venture (the “MC/Gale JV LLC”) with Gale International/426 Washington St. LLC (“Gale/426”), which, in turn, entered into a joint venture (the “Vornado JV LLC”) with VNO 426 Washington Street JV LLC (“Vornado”), an affiliate of Vornado Realty LP, which was formed to acquire and redevelop the Filenes property located in the Downtown Crossing district of Boston, Massachusetts (the “Filenes Property”).

On January 25, 2007, (i) each of M-C/Gale JV LLC, Gale and Washington Street Realty Member LLC (“JPM”) formed a joint venture (“JPM JV LLC”), (ii) M-C/Gale JV LLC assigned its entire 50 percent ownership interest in the Vornado JV LLC to JPM JV LLC, (iii) the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Vornado JV LLC was amended to reflect, among other things, the change in the ownership structure described in subsection (ii) above, and (iv) the Limited Liability Company Agreement of MC/Gale JV LLC was amended and restated to reflect, among other things, the change in the ownership structure described in subsection (ii) above.  The Vornado JV LLC acquired the Filenes Property on January 29, 2007, for approximately $100 million.
 
 
 
18

 
 

 
On or about September 16, 2008, Vornado JV LLC was reorganized in contemplation of developing and converting the Filenes property into a condominium consisting of a retail unit, an office unit, a parking unit, a hotel unit and a residential unit.  Pursuant to this reorganization, (i) the Company and Gale/426 formed a new joint venture (“M-C/Gale JV II LLC”) and (ii) M-C/Gale JV II LLC and Washington Street Realty Member II LLC (“JPM II”) formed a new joint venture (“JPM JV II LLC”) to invest in a new joint venture (“Vornado JV II LLC”) with Vornado RTR DC LLC, an affiliate of Vornado Realty, LP (“Vornado II”).  Following this reorganization, Vornado JV LLC owns the interests in the retail unit and the office unit (the “Filenes Office/Retail Component”) and Vornado JV II LLC owns the interests in the parking unit, the hotel unit and the residential unit (“the “Filenes Hotel/Residential/Parking Component”).   In connection with the foregoing, (a) the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Vornado JV LLC, as amended, was amended and restated to reflect, among other things, the change in the ownership structure described above, (b) the Limited Liability Company Agreement of JPM JV LLC was amended and restated to reflect, among other things, the change in the ownership structure described above and (c) the Limited Liability Company Agreement of M-C/Gale JV LLC was amended and restated to reflect, among other things, the change in the ownership structure described above.

As a result of the foregoing transactions, (A) (i) the Filenes Office/Retail Component is owned by Vornado JV LLC, (ii) Vornado JV LLC is owned 50 percent by each of Vornado and JPM JV LLC, (iii) JPM JV LLC is owned 30 percent by M-C/Gale JV LLC, 70 percent by JPM and managed by Gale/426, which has no ownership interest in JPM JV LLC, and (iv) M-C/Gale JV LLC is owned 99.99 percent by the Company and 0.01 percent by Gale/426 and (B) (i) the Filenes Hotel/Residential/Parking Component is owned by Vornado JV II LLC, (ii) Vornado JV II LLC is owned 50 percent by each of Vornado II and JPM JV II LLC, (iii) JPM JV II LLC is owned 30 percent by M-C/Gale JV II LLC, 70 percent by JPM II and managed by Gale/426, which has no ownership interest in JPM JV II LLC, and (iv) M-C/Gale JV II LLC is owned 99.99 percent by the Company and 0.01 percent by Gale/426.  Thus, the Company holds approximately a 15 percent indirect ownership interest in each of Vornado JV LLC and Vornado JV II LLC and the Filenes Property.

Distributions are made (i) by Vornado JV LLC in proportion to its members’ respective ownership interests, (ii) by JPM JV LLC (a) initially, in proportion to its members’ respective ownership interests until JPM’s investment yields an 11 percent IRR, (b) thereafter, 60/40 to JPM and MC/Gale JV LLC, respectively, until JPM’s investment yields a 15 percent IRR and (c) thereafter, 50/50 to JPM and MC/Gale JV LLC, respectively, and (iii) by MC/Gale JV LLC (w) initially, in proportion to its members’ respective ownership interests until each member has received a 10 percent IRR on its investment, (x) thereafter, 65/35 to the Company and Gale/426, respectively, until the Company’s investment yields a 15 percent IRR, (y) if by the time the Company receives a 15 percent IRR on its investment, Gale/426 has not done so, 100 percent to Gale/426 until Gale/426’s investment yields a 15 percent IRR, and (z) thereafter,  50/50 to each of the Company and Gale/426.

Distributions are made (i) by Vornado JV II LLC in proportion to its members’ respective ownership interests, (ii) by JPM JV II LLC (a) initially, in proportion to its members’ respective ownership interests until JPM II’s investment yields an 11 percent IRR, (b) thereafter, 60/40 to JPM II and M-C/Gale JV II LLC, respectively, until JPM II’s investment yields a 15 percent IRR and (c) thereafter, 50/50 to JPM II and M-C/Gale JV II LLC, respectively, and (iii) by M-C/Gale JV II LLC (w) initially, in proportion to its members’ respective ownership interests until each member has received a 10 percent IRR on its investment, (x) thereafter, 65/35 to the Company and Gale/426, respectively, until the Company’s investment yields a 15 percent IRR, (y) if by the time the Company receives a 15 percent IRR on its investment, Gale/426 has not done so, 100 percent to Gale/426 until Gale/426’s investment yields a 15 percent IRR, and (z) thereafter, 50/50 to each of the Company and Gale/426.

The joint venture has suspended its plans for the development of the Filenes Property which was to include approximately 1.2 million square feet consisting of office, retail, condominium apartments, hotel and a parking garage.  The project is subject to governmental approvals.  The venture recorded an impairment charge of approximately $69.5 million on its development project as of December 31, 2008.
 
 
 
 
19

 

 
GALE JEFFERSON, L.L.C.
On August 22, 2007, the Company entered into a joint venture with a Gale Affiliate to form M-C Jefferson, L.L.C. (“M-C Jefferson”).  M-C Jefferson was formed for the sole purpose of acquiring a Gale Affiliate’s 33.33 percent membership interest in Gale Jefferson, L.L.C. (“Gale Jefferson”), an entity holding a 25 percent interest in One Jefferson Road LLC (“One Jefferson”), which developed and placed in service a 100,000 square foot office property at One Jefferson Road, Parsippany, New Jersey, (“the Jefferson Property”).  The property has been fully leased to a single tenant through August 2025.

The operating agreement of M-C Jefferson provides, among other things, for the Gale Participation Rights (of which Mark Yeager, a former Executive Vice President of the Company, has a direct 26 percent interest).  Gale Jefferson is owned 33.33 percent by M-C Jefferson and 66.67 percent by the Hampshire Generational Fund, L.L.C. (“Hampshire”).  The operating agreements of Gale Jefferson provides, among other things, for the distribution of net cash flow, first, in accordance with its member’s respective interests until each member is provided, as a result of such distributions, with an annual 12 percent compound return on the Member’s Capital Contributions, as defined in the operating agreement and secondly, 50 percent to each of the Company and Hampshire.

One Jefferson has a loan in an amount not to exceed $21 million (with a balance of $14.8 million at March 31, 2010), bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 160 basis points and maturing on October 24, 2010 with a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions and payment of a fee.

The Company performs management, leasing and other services for Gale Jefferson and recognized $37,000 and $135,000 in income (net of $1.0 million and $314,000 in direct costs) for such services for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 
20

 

SUMMARIES OF UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The following is a summary of the financial position of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company had investment interests as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. (dollars in thousands)


 
March 31, 2010
 
Plaza
 
Red Bank
 
Princeton
   
Boston-
     
 
VIII & IX
Harborside
Corporate
Gramercy
Forrestal
Gale
12
Downtown
Gale
Combined
 
 
Associates
South Pier
Plaza
Agreement
Village
Kimball
Vreeland
Crossing
Jefferson
Total
 
Assets:
                     
Rental property, net
$   9,407
$ 65,900
$ 23,955
$ 68,449
$ 38,092
--
$ 14,962
--
--
$ 220,765
 
Other assets
1,210
10,311
5,838
8,824
21,847
$  1,897
1,021
$ 46,290
$  1,813
99,051
 
Total assets
$ 10,617
$ 76,211
$ 29,793
$ 77,273
$ 59,939
$  1,897
$ 15,983
$ 46,290
$  1,813
$ 319,816
 
Liabilities and
                     
 partners’/members’
                     
 capital (deficit):
                     
Mortgages, loans
                     
  payable and other
                     
  obligations
--
$ 73,306
$ 20,679
$ 77,758
$ 50,747
--
$   4,671
--
--
$ 227,161
 
Other liabilities
$      533
5,277
54
2,381
3,371
--
--
--
--
11,616
 
Partners’/members’
                     
  capital (deficit)
10,084
(2,372)
9,060
(2,866)
5,821
$  1,897
11,312
$ 46,290
$  1,813
81,039
 
Total liabilities and
                     
  partners’/members’
                     
  capital (deficit)
$ 10,617
$ 76,211
$ 29,793
$ 77,273
$ 59,939
$  1,897
$ 15,983
$ 46,290
$  1,813
$ 319,816
 
Company’s
                     
  investment
                     
  in unconsolidated
                     
  joint ventures, net
$   4,964
 $        92
$   4,264
--
$   1,432
$  1,227
$   9,688
$ 13,061
$     782
$   35,510
 


 
December 31, 2009
 
Plaza
 
Red Bank
 
Princeton
   
Boston-
     
 
VIII & IX
Harborside
Corporate
Gramercy
Forrestal
Gale
12
Downtown
Gale
Combined
 
 
Associates
South Pier
Plaza
Agreement
Village
Kimball
Vreeland
Crossing
Jefferson
Total
 
Assets:
                     
Rental property, net
$   9,560
$ 61,836
$ 24,884
$   73,037
$ 38,722
--
$ 15,265
--
--
$ 223,304
 
Other assets
997
15,483
4,623
8,631
22,034
$ 1,998
1,068
$ 45,884
$ 1,780
102,498
 
Total assets
$ 10,557
$ 77,319
$ 29,507
$   81,668
$ 60,756
$ 1,998
$ 16,333
$ 45,884
$ 1,780
$ 325,802
 
Liabilities and
                     
 partners’/members’
                     
 capital (deficit):
                     
Mortgages, loans
                     
  payable and other
                     
  obligations
--
$ 73,553
$ 20,764
$   90,288
$ 51,186
--
$   5,007
--
--
$ 240,798
 
Other liabilities
$      532
4,458
162
2,589
3,928
--
--
--
--
11,669
 
Partners’/members’
                     
  capital (deficit)
10,025
(692)
8,581
(11,209)
5,642
$ 1,998
 11,326
$ 45,884
$ 1,780
73,335
 
Total liabilities and
                     
  partners’/members’
                     
  capital (deficit)
$ 10,557
$ 77,319
$ 29,507
$   81,668
$ 60,756
$ 1,998
$ 16,333
$ 45,884
$ 1,780
$ 325,802
 
Company’s
                     
  investment
                     
  in unconsolidated
                     
  joint ventures, net
$   4,935
$      860
$   4,104
--
$   1,211
$ 1,259
$   9,599
$ 12,948
$    764
$   35,680
 

 
21

 

SUMMARIES OF UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The following is a summary of the results of operations of the unconsolidated joint ventures for the period in which the Company had investment interests during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  (dollars in thousands)


 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
 
Plaza
 
Red Bank
 
Princeton
   
Boston-
     
 
VIII & IX
Harborside
Corporate
Gramercy
Forrestal
Gale
12
Downtown
Gale
Route 93
Combined
 
Associates
South Pier
Plaza
Agreement
Village
Kimball
Vreeland
Crossing
Jefferson
Portfolio
Total
Total revenues
$ 261
$  5,107
$ 1,757
$ 11,718
$  3,311
$ 44
$  594
--
--
--
$ 22,792
Operating and other
(49)
(4,453)
(212)
(1,699)
(1,859)
--
(14)
$ (191)
$  (57)
--
(8,534)
Depreciation and amortization
(153)
(1,110)
(220)
(1,003)
(842)
--
(316)
--
--
--
(3,644)
Interest expense
--
(1,080)
(83)
(673)
(430)
--
(86)
--
--
--
(2,352)
                       
Net income
$   59
$ (1,536)
$ 1,242
$  8,343
$     180
$ 44
$  178
$ (191)
$  (57)
--
$   8,262
Company’s equity in earnings
                     
  (loss) of unconsolidated
                     
  joint ventures
$   30
$    (768)
$    152
--
$       28
$ 16
$   89
$   (57)
$  (12)
--
$     (522)


 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
 
Plaza
 
Red Bank
 
Princeton
   
Boston-
     
 
VIII & IX
Harborside
Corporate
 
Forrestal
Gale
12
Downtown
Gale
Route 93
Combined
 
Associates
South Pier
Plaza
M-G-G
Village
Kimball
Vreeland
Crossing
Jefferson
Portfolio
Total
Total revenues
$ 188
$  6,827
$   810
$ 13,179
$ 3,171
$ 64
$ 595
--
$ 1
$     720
$ 25,555
Operating and other
(43)
(4,979)
(249)
(5,336)
(1,669)
--
(19)
$ (1,120)
--
(1,108)
(14,523)
Depreciation and amortization
(153)
(998)
(148)
(4,834)
(906)
--
(128)
--
--
(453)
(7,620)
Interest expense
--
(1,144)
(83)
(3,644)
(475)
--
(121)
--
--
(306)
(5,773)
                       
Net income
$    (8)
$    (294)
$   330
$     (635)
$     121
$ 64
$ 327
$ (1,120)
$ 1
$ (1,147)
$  (2,361)
Company’s equity in earnings
                     
  (loss) of unconsolidated
                     
  joint ventures
$    (4)
$     746
$   165
$    (712)
$       16
$ 18
$ 164
$ (1,153)
--
$ (4,354)
$  (5,114)


 
22

 

4.  
DEFERRED CHARGES AND OTHER ASSETS

 
March 31,
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2010
2009
Deferred leasing costs
$220,750
$229,725
Deferred financing costs
27,585
26,733
 
248,335
256,458
Accumulated amortization
(111,447)
(119,267)
Deferred charges, net
136,888
137,191
In-place lease values, related intangible and other assets, net
44,964
49,180
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net
32,150
27,303
     
Total deferred charges and other assets, net
$214,002
$213,674


5.  
SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES

A summary of the Company’s senior unsecured notes as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

 
March 31,
December 31,
Effective
 
2010
2009
Rate (1)
5.050% Senior Unsecured Notes, due April 15, 2010 (2)
$149,998
$149,984
5.265%
7.835% Senior Unsecured Notes, due December 15, 2010
15,000
15,000
7.950%
7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes, due February 15, 2011
299,857
299,814
7.930%
5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 15, 2012
99,647
99,599
5.457%
6.150% Senior Unsecured Notes, due December 15, 2012
93,578
93,455
6.894%
5.820% Senior Unsecured Notes, due March 15, 2013
25,779
25,751
6.448%
4.600% Senior Unsecured Notes, due June 15, 2013
99,908
99,901
4.742%
5.125% Senior Unsecured Notes, due February 15, 2014
200,929
200,989
5.110%
5.125% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 15, 2015
149,556
149,533
5.297%
5.800% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 15, 2016
200,445
200,464
5.806%
7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes, due August 15, 2019
247,998
247,944
8.017%
       
Total Senior Unsecured Notes
$1,582,695
$1,582,434
6.373%
       
(1)  Includes the cost of terminated treasury lock agreements (if any), offering and other transaction costs and the discount/premium on the notes, as applicable.
(2)  These notes were paid at maturity on April 15, 2010.


6.      UNSECURED REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY

The Company has a $775 million unsecured credit facility (expandable to $800 million) with a group of 23 Lenders.  The facility matures in June 2011, with an extension option of one year, which would require a payment of 15 basis points of the then borrowing capacity of the facility upon exercise.  The interest rate on outstanding borrowings (not electing the Company’s competitive bid feature) is LIBOR plus 55 basis points at the BBB/Baa2 pricing level.

The facility has a competitive bid feature, which allows the Company to solicit bids from lenders under the facility to borrow up to $300 million at interest rates less than the current LIBOR plus 55 basis point spread.  The Company may also elect an interest rate representing the higher of the lender’s prime rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points. The unsecured facility also requires a 15 basis point facility fee on the current borrowing capacity payable quarterly in arrears.
 
 
 
23

 
 

 
The interest rate and the facility fee are subject to adjustment, on a sliding scale, based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings.  In the event of a change in the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt rating, the interest and facility fee rates will be adjusted in accordance with the following table:

Operating Partnership’s
Interest Rate –
 
Unsecured Debt Ratings:
Applicable Basis Points
Facility Fee
S&P Moody’s/Fitch (a)
Above LIBOR
Basis Points
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3/BBB-
100.0
25.0
BBB-/Baa3/BBB-
75.0
20.0
BBB/Baa2/BBB (current)
55.0
15.0
BBB+/Baa1/BBB+
42.5
15.0
A-/A3/A- or higher
37.5
12.5
     
(a)   If the Operating Partnership has debt ratings from two rating agencies, one of which is Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”) or Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”), the rates per the above table shall be based on the lower of such ratings.  If the Operating Partnership has debt ratings from three rating agencies, one of which is S&P or Moody’s, the rates per the above table shall be based on the lower of the two highest ratings.  If the Operating Partnership has debt ratings from only one agency, it will be considered to have no rating or less than BBB-/Baa3/BBB- per the above table.

The terms of the unsecured facility include certain restrictions and covenants which limit, among other things, the payment of dividends (as discussed below), the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of real estate properties (to the extent that: (i) such property dispositions cause the Company to default on any of the financial ratios of the facility described below, or (ii) the property dispositions are completed while the Company is under an event of default under the facility, unless, under certain circumstances, such disposition is being carried out to cure such default), and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum leverage ratio, the maximum amount of secured indebtedness, the minimum amount of tangible net worth, the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage, the maximum amount of unsecured indebtedness, the minimum amount of unencumbered property interest coverage and certain investment limitations.  The dividend restriction referred to above provides that, if an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company will not make any excess distributions with respect to common stock or other common equity interests except to enable the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Code.

The lending group for the credit facility consists of: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Agent”); Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent; Scotiabanc, Inc., Wachovia Bank, National Association; and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as documentation agents; SunTrust Bank, as senior managing agent; US Bank National Association, Citicorp North America, Inc.; and PNC Bank National Association, as managing agents; and Bank of China, New York Branch; The Bank of New York; Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.; The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC; Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.; The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (Successor by merger to UFJ Bank Limited); North Fork Bank; Bank Hapoalim B.M.; Comerica Bank; Chang Hwa Commercial Bank, Ltd., New York Branch; First Commercial Bank, New York Agency; Mega International Commercial Bank Co. Ltd., New York Branch; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Hua Nan Commercial Bank, New York Agency, as participants.

As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility.

MONEY MARKET LOAN
The Company has an agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank to participate in a noncommitted money market loan program (“Money Market Loan”).  The Money Market Loan is an unsecured borrowing of up to $75 million arranged by JPMorgan Chase Bank with maturities of 30 days or less.  The rate of interest on the Money Market Loan borrowing is set at the time of each borrowing.  As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Money Market Loan.


 
24

 

7.      MORTGAGES, LOANS PAYABLE AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

The Company has mortgages, loans payable and other obligations which primarily consist of various loans collateralized by certain of the Company’s rental properties.  As of March 31, 2010, 32 of the Company’s properties, with a total book value of approximately $1,011,401,000, are encumbered by the Company’s mortgages and loans payable.  Payments on mortgages, loans payable and other obligations are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest, or interest only.

A summary of the Company’s mortgages, loans payable and other obligations as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows: (dollars in thousands)

   
Effective
   
   
Interest
March 31,
December 31, 
 
Property Name
Lender
Rate (a)
2010
2009
    Maturity
105 Challenger Road
Archon Financial CMBS
6.24%
$  19,463
$ 19,408
06/06/10
2200 Renaissance Boulevard
Wachovia CMBS
5.89%
16,510
16,619
12/01/12
Soundview Plaza
Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital
6.02%
16,486
16,614
01/01/13
9200 Edmonston Road
Principal Commercial Funding L.L.C.
5.53%
4,765
4,804
05/01/13
6305 Ivy Lane
John Hancock Life Insurance Co.
5.53%
6,640
6,693
01/01/14
395 West Passaic
State Farm Life Insurance Co.
6.00%
11,621
11,735
05/01/14
6301 Ivy Lane
John Hancock Life Insurance Co.
5.52%
6,249
6,297
07/01/14
35 Waterview Boulevard
Wachovia CMBS
6.35%
19,542
19,613
08/11/14
6 Becker, 85 Livingston,
  75 Livingston &
  20 Waterview
Wachovia CMBS
10.22%
60,605
60,409
08/11/14
4 Sylvan
Wachovia CMBS
10.19%
14,366
14,357
08/11/14
10 Independence
Wachovia CMBS
12.44%
15,403
15,339
08/11/14
4 Becker
Wachovia CMBS
9.55%
36,475
36,281
05/11/16
5 Becker
Wachovia CMBS
12.83%
11,225
11,111
05/11/16
210 Clay
Wachovia CMBS
13.42%
11,216
11,138
05/11/16
51 Imclone
Wachovia CMBS
8.39%
3,897
3,899
05/11/16
Various (b)
Prudential Insurance
6.33%
150,000
150,000
01/15/17
23 Main Street
JPMorgan CMBS
5.59%
31,912
32,042
09/01/18
Harborside Plaza 5
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. & New York Life Insurance Co.
6.84%
236,583
237,248
11/01/18
100 Walnut Avenue
Guardian Life Insurance Co.
7.31%
19,585
19,600
02/01/19
One River Center (c)
Guardian Life Insurance Co.
7.31%
44,865
44,900
02/01/19
581 Main Street
Valley National Bank
6.94% (d)
16,827
16,896
07/01/34
           
Total mortgages, loans payable and other obligations
 
$754,235
$755,003
 

(a)  Reflects effective rate of debt, including deferred financing costs, comprised of the cost of terminated treasury lock agreements (if any), debt initiation costs, mark-to-market adjustment of acquired debt and other transaction costs, as applicable.
(b)  Mortgage is collateralized by seven properties.  On January 15, 2010, the Company extended the mortgage loan until January 15, 2017 at an effective interest rate of 6.33 percent.
(c)  Mortgage is collateralized by the three properties comprising One River Center.
(d)  The coupon interest rate will be reset at the end of year 10 and year 20 at 225 basis points over the 10-year treasury yield 45 days prior to the reset dates with a minimum rate of 6.875 percent.

CASH PAID FOR INTEREST AND INTEREST CAPITALIZED
Cash paid for interest for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $52,365,000, and $46,135,000, respectively.  Interest capitalized by the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $343,000 and $660,000, respectively.

SUMMARY OF INDEBTEDNESS
As of March 31, 2010 the Company’s total indebtedness of $2,336,930,000 (weighted average interest rate of 6.70 percent) was comprised of all fixed rate debt.  As of December 31, 2009 the Company’s total indebtedness of $2,337,437,000 (weighted average interest rate of 6.61 percent) was comprised of all fixed rate debt.


 
25

 

8.      EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 401(k) PLANS

Employees of the Company, who meet certain minimum age and service requirements, are eligible to participate in the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”).  Eligible employees may elect to defer from one percent up to 60 percent of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis to the 401(k) Plan, subject to certain limitations imposed by federal law.  The amounts contributed by employees are immediately vested and non-forfeitable.  The Company may make discretionary matching or profit sharing contributions to the 401(k) Plan on behalf of eligible participants in any plan year.  Participants are always 100 percent vested in their pre-tax contributions and will begin vesting in any matching or profit sharing contributions made on their behalf after two years of service with the Company at a rate of 20 percent per year, becoming 100 percent vested after a total of six years of service with the Company.  All contributions are allocated as a percentage of compensation of the eligible participants for the Plan year.  The assets of the 401(k) Plan are held in trust and a separate account is established for each participant.  A participant may receive a distribution of his or her vested account balance in the 401(k) Plan in a single sum or in installment payments upon his or her termination of service with the Company.  The Company did not recognize any expense for the 401(k) Plan for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  The Company did not make any contributions to the 401(k) Plan in 2009 and for the three months ended March 31, 2010.


9.      DISCLOSURE OF FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Effective April 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 825, Financial Instruments, related to interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments.  The authoritative guidance requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in both interim and annual financial statements. It also requires those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.

The following disclosure of estimated fair value was determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value.  Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.  The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash equivalents, marketable securities, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, consisting of senior unsecured notes, an unsecured revolving credit facility and mortgages, loans payable and other obligations aggregate approximately $2.4 billion and $2.4 billion as compared to the book value of approximately $2.3 billion and $2.3 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.  The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated on a level 2 basis (as provided by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures), using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities.  The fair value of the mortgage debt and the unsecured notes was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate.

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.  Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since March 31, 2010 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.


 
26

 

10.      COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS
Harborside Financial Center
Pursuant to agreements with the City of Jersey City, New Jersey, the Company is required to make payments in lieu of property taxes (“PILOT”) on certain of its properties located in Jersey City, as follows:

The Harborside Plaza 4-A agreement, which commenced in 2000, is for a term of 20 years.  The PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project costs, as defined, and increases by 10 percent in years 7, 10 and 13 and by 50 percent in year 16.  Total Project costs, as defined, are $45.5 million.  The PILOT totaled $247,000 and $250,000 three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Harborside Plaza 5 agreement, as amended, which commenced in 2002 upon substantial completion of the property, as defined, is for a term of 20 years.  The PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project Costs.  Total Project Costs, as defined, are $159.6 million.  The PILOT totaled $798,000 and $798,000 three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Total Project Costs for Harborside Plaza 5 and Harborside Plaza 4-A are currently being reviewed by the City of Jersey City.  The Company believes that the ultimate resolution of such reviews will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

At the conclusion of the above-referenced PILOT agreements, it is expected that the properties will be assessed by the municipality and be subject to real estate taxes at the then prevailing rates.

LITIGATION
The Company is a defendant in litigation arising in the normal course of its business activities.  Management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a materially adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition taken as whole.

GROUND LEASE AGREEMENTS
Future minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable ground leases under which the Company is the lessee, as March 31, 2010, are as follows: (dollars in thousands)

Year
Amount  
April 1 through December 31, 2010
$    395
2011
526
2012
518
2013
502
2014
530
2015 through 2084
34,001
   
Total
$36,472

Ground lease expense incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $159,000, and $191,000, respectively.

OTHER
The Company may not dispose of or distribute certain of its properties, currently comprising seven properties with an aggregate net book value of approximately $134.7 million, which were originally contributed by certain unrelated common unitholders, without the express written consent of such common unitholders, as applicable, except in a manner which does not result in recognition of any built-in-gain (which may result in an income tax liability) or which reimburses the appropriate specific common unitholders for the tax consequences of the recognition of such built-in-gains (collectively, the “Property Lock-Ups”).  The aforementioned restrictions do not apply in the event that the Company sells all of its properties or in connection with a sale transaction which the Company’s Board of Directors determines is reasonably necessary to satisfy a material monetary default on any unsecured debt, judgment or liability of the Company or to cure any material monetary default on any mortgage secured by a property.  The Property Lock-Ups expire periodically through 2016.  Upon the expiration of the Property Lock-Ups, the Company is generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent any sale, transfer or other disposition of the subject properties from resulting in the recognition of built-in gain to the specific common unitholders, which include members of the Mack Group (which includes William L. Mack, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors; David S. Mack, director; Earle I. Mack, a former director; and Mitchell E. Hersh, president, chief executive officer and director), the Robert Martin Group (which includes Martin S. Berger, director; Robert F. Weinberg, a former director; and Timothy M. Jones, former president), the Cali Group (which includes John R. Cali, director, and John J. Cali, a former director).  130 of the Company’s properties, with an aggregate net book value of approximately $1.8 billion, have lapsed restrictions and are subject to these conditions.
 
 
 
27

 
 

 
The Company is obligated to acquire from an entity (the “Florham Entity”) whose beneficial owners include Stanley C. Gale and Mark Yeager, a former executive officer of the Company, a 50 percent interest in a venture which owns a developable land parcel in Florham Park, New Jersey (the “Florham Park Land”) for a maximum purchase price of up to $10.5 million, subject to reduction based on developable square feet approved and other conditions, with the completion of such acquisition subject to the Florham Entity obtaining final development permits and approvals and related conditions necessary to allow for office development expected to be 600,000 square feet.  In the event the acquisition of the Florham Park Land does not close by May 9, 2010, subject to certain conditions, the Florham Entity will be obligated to pay certain deferred costs and an additional $1 million to the Company at that time.

Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. (“Sanofi”), which occupies neighboring buildings in Bridgewater, New Jersey, exercised its option to cause the Company to construct a building on its vacant, developable land and has signed a lease for the building.  The lease has a term of fifteen years, subject to three five-year extension options.  The construction of the 205,000 square foot building commenced in 2009 and is expected to be delivered to the tenant in January 2011.  The total estimated costs of the project are expected to be approximately $50.9 million (of which the Company has incurred $22.5 million through March 31, 2010.)


11.  
TENANT LEASES

The Properties are leased to tenants under operating leases with various expiration dates through 2030.  Substantially all of the leases provide for annual base rents plus recoveries and escalation charges based upon the tenant’s proportionate share of and/or increases in real estate taxes and certain operating costs, as defined, and the pass-through of charges for electrical usage.

Future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable operating leases at March 31, 2010 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year
Amount
April 1 through December 31, 2010
$ 447,368
2011
555,380
2012
493,222
2013
405,313
2014
333,404
2015 and thereafter
1,122,043
   
Total
$3,356,730


12.
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

To maintain its qualification as a REIT, not more than 50 percent in value of the outstanding shares of the Company may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of any taxable year of the Company, other than its initial taxable year (defined to include certain entities), applying certain constructive ownership rules.  To help ensure that the Company will not fail this test, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide for, among other things, certain restrictions on the transfer of common stock to prevent further concentration of stock ownership.  Moreover, to evidence compliance with these requirements, the Company must maintain records that disclose the actual ownership of its outstanding common stock and demands written statements each year from the holders of record of designated percentages of its common stock requesting the disclosure of the beneficial owners of such common stock.
 
 
 
28

 
 

 
PREFERRED STOCK
The Company has 10,000 shares of eight-percent Series C cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock issued and outstanding (“Series C Preferred Stock”) in the form of 1,000,000 depositary shares ($25 stated value per depositary share).  Each depositary share represents 1/100th of a share of Series C Preferred Stock.

The Series C Preferred Stock has preference rights with respect to liquidation and distributions over the common stock. Holders of the Series C Preferred Stock, except under certain limited conditions, will not be entitled to vote on any matters.  In the event of a cumulative arrearage equal to six quarterly dividends, holders of the Series C Preferred Stock will have the right to elect two additional members to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors until dividends have been paid in full.  At March 31, 2010, there were no dividends in arrears.  The Company may issue unlimited additional preferred stock ranking on a parity with the Series C Preferred Stock but may not issue any preferred stock senior to the Series C Preferred Stock without the consent of two-thirds of its holders.  The Series C Preferred Stock is essentially on an equivalent basis in priority with the preferred units of the Operating Partnership (See Note 13: Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries).

The Series C Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at $25 per depositary share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends.

SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On September 12, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized an increase to the Company’s repurchase program under which the Company was permitted to purchase up to $150 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock (“Repurchase Program”).  The Company has purchased and retired 2,893,630 shares of its outstanding common stock for an aggregate cost of approximately $104 million through March 31, 2010 under the Repurchase Program (none of which has occurred in 2009 and the three months ended March 31, 2010.)  The Company has a remaining authorization to repurchase up to an additional $46 million of its outstanding common stock, which it may repurchase from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing prices or through privately negotiated transactions.

STOCK OPTION PLANS
In May 2004, the Company established the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan under which a total of 2,500,000 shares have been reserved for issuance.  No options have been granted through March 31, 2010 under this plan.  In September 2000, the Company established the 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (“2000 Employee Plan”) and the Amended and Restated 2000 Director Stock Option Plan (“2000 Director Plan”).  In May 2002, shareholders of the Company approved amendments to both plans to increase the total shares reserved for issuance under both of the 2000 plans from 2,700,000 to 4,350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (from 2,500,000 to 4,000,000 shares under the 2000 Employee Plan and from 200,000 to 350,000 shares under the 2000 Director Plan).  In 1994, and as subsequently amended, the Company established the Mack-Cali Employee Stock Option Plan (“Employee Plan”) and the Mack-Cali Director Stock Option Plan (“Director Plan”) under which a total of 5,380,188 shares (subject to adjustment) of the Company’s common stock had been reserved for issuance (4,980,188 shares under the Employee Plan and 400,000 shares under the Director Plan).  As the Employee Plan and Director Plan expired in 2004, stock options may no longer be issued under those plans.  Stock options granted under the Employee Plan in 1994 and 1995 became exercisable over a three-year period.  Stock options granted under the 2000 Employee Plan and those options granted subsequent to 1995 under the Employee Plan become exercisable over a five-year period.  All stock options granted under both the 2000 Director Plan and Director Plan become exercisable in one year.  All options were granted at the fair market value at the dates of grant and have terms of ten years.  As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the stock options outstanding had a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 2.3 and 2.5 years, respectively.  Stock options exercisable at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 had a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 2.3 and 2.5 years, respectively.
 
 
 
29

 

 
Information regarding the Company’s stock option plans is summarized below:

   
Weighted
Aggregate
 
Shares
Average
Intrinsic
 
Under
Exercise
Value
 
Options
Price
$(000’s)
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
352,184
$28.74
$2,055
Exercised
(11,305)
27.55
 
Lapsed or canceled
--
   
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 ($26.25 – $45.47)
340,879
$28.78
$2,205
Options exercisable at March 31, 2010
340,879
   
Available for grant at March 31, 2010
3,824,270
   

Cash received from options exercised under all stock option plans was $311,400 and $0 for the three month ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $80,000 and $0, respectively.  The Company has a policy of issuing new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.

STOCK COMPENSATION
The Company has issued stock awards (“Restricted Stock Awards”) to officers, certain other employees, and nonemployee members of the Board of Directors of the Company, which allow the holders to each receive a certain amount of shares of the Company’s common stock generally over a one to seven-year vesting period, of which 216,802 unvested shares were outstanding as of March 31, 2010.  Of the outstanding Restricted Stock Awards issued to executive officers and senior management, 137,932 are contingent upon the Company meeting certain performance goals to be set by the Executive Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company each year, with the remaining based on time and service. All Restricted Stock Awards provided to the officers and certain other employees were issued under the 2000 Employee Plan and the Employee Plan. Restricted Stock Awards provided to directors were issued under the 2000 Director Plan.

Information regarding the Restricted Stock Awards is summarized below:

   
Weighted-Average
   
Grant – Date
 
Shares
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
323,088
$ 36.58
Granted
36,200
 35.40
Vested
(119,008)
 34.63
Forfeited
(23,478)
 35.70
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
216,802
$ 37.55

DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
The Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, which commenced January 1, 1999, allows non-employee directors of the Company to elect to defer up to 100 percent of their annual retainer fee into deferred stock units.  The deferred stock units are convertible into an equal number of shares of common stock upon the directors’ termination of service from the Board of Directors or a change in control of the Company, as defined in the plan.  Deferred stock units are credited to each director quarterly using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the applicable dividend record date for the respective quarter.  Each participating director’s account is also credited for an equivalent amount of deferred stock units based on the dividend rate for each quarter.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 2,681 and 4,369 deferred stock units were earned, respectively.  As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, there were 74,825 and 59,743 director stock units outstanding, respectively.
 
 
 
30

 
 

 
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

The following information presents the Company’s results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share:  (dollars in thousands)

   
Three Months Ended
   
March 31,
Computation of Basic EPS
 
2010
2009
Income from continuing operations
 
$17,377
$14,597
Add:         Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
 
87
632
Deduct:  Noncontrolling interest in operating partnership
 
(2,455)
(2,628)
Deduct:  Preferred stock dividends
 
(500)
(500)
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders
 
14,509
12,101
Net income available to common shareholders
 
$14,509
$12,101
       
Weighted average common shares
 
78,973
66,484
       
Basic EPS:
     
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders
 
$         0.18
$          0.18
Net income available to common shareholders
 
$         0.18
$          0.18


   
Three Months Ended
   
March 31,
Computation of Diluted EPS
 
2010
2009
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders
 
$14,509
$12,101
Add:         Income from continuing operations attributable to common units
 
2,455
2,628
Income from continuing operations for diluted earnings per share
 
16,964
14,729
Net income available to common shareholders
 
$16,964
$14,729
       
Weighted average common shares
 
92,450
80,921
       
Diluted EPS:
     
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders
 
$ 0.18
$         0.18
Net income available to common shareholders
 
$ 0.18
$         0.18

The following schedule reconciles the shares used in the basic EPS calculation to the shares used in the diluted EPS calculation:

   
Three Months Ended
   
March 31,
   
2010
2009
Basic EPS shares
 
78,973
66,484
Add:Operating Partnership – common units
 
13,365
14,437
Stock options
 
57
--
Restricted Stock Awards
 
55
--
Diluted EPS Shares
 
92,450
80,921

Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 were 216,802 and 304,418, respectively.


 
31

 

The following are dividends declared per share of Common Stock for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

   
Three Months Ended
   
March 31,
   
2010
2009
Dividends declared per common share
 
$ 0.45
$ 0.45


13.      NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated financial statements relate to (i) preferred units (“Preferred Units”) and common units in the Operating Partnership, held by parties other than the Company, and (ii) interests in consolidated joint ventures for the portion of such properties not owned by the Company.

OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

Preferred Units
In connection with the Company’s issuance of $25 million of Series C cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock, the Company acquired from the Operating Partnership $25 million of Series C Preferred Units (the “Series C Preferred Units”), which have terms essentially identical to the Series C preferred stock.  See Note 12:  Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Stockholders’ Equity – Preferred Stock.

Common Units
Certain individuals and entities own common units in the Operating Partnership.  A common unit and a share of Common Stock of the Company have substantially the same economic characteristics in as much as they effectively share equally in the net income or loss of the Operating Partnership.  Common unitholders have the right to redeem their common units, subject to certain restrictions.  The redemption is required to be satisfied in shares of Common Stock, cash, or a combination thereof, calculated as follows:  one share of the Company’s Common Stock, or cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock at the time of redemption, for each common unit.  The Company, in its sole discretion, determines the form of redemption of common units (i.e., whether a common unitholder receives Common Stock, cash, or any combination thereof).  If the Company elects to satisfy the redemption with shares of Common Stock as opposed to cash, it is obligated to issue shares of its Common Stock to the redeeming unitholder.  Regardless of the rights described above, the common unitholders may not put their units for cash to the Company or the Operating Partnership under any circumstances.  When a unitholder redeems a common unit, noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership is reduced and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Stockholders’ equity is increased.

Unit Transactions
The following table sets forth the changes in noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries which relate to the common units in the Operating Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

       
Common
       
Units
Balance at January 1, 2010
     
13,495,036
Redemption of common units for shares
       
of Common Stock
     
(189,930)
         
Balance at March 31, 2010
     
13,305,106

Pursuant to ASC 810, Consolidation, changes in a parent’s ownership interest (and transactions with noncontrolling interest unitholders in the subsidiary) while the parent retains its controlling interest in its subsidiary should be accounted for as equity transactions.  The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest shall be adjusted to reflect the change in its ownership interest in the subsidiary, with the offset to equity attributable to the parent.  Accordingly, as a result of equity transactions which caused changes in ownership percentages between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company has decreased noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership and increased additional paid-in capital in Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity by approximately $0.01 million as of March 31, 2010.
 
 
 
32

 
 

 
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST OWNERSHIP
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the noncontrolling interest common unitholders owned 14.4 percent and 14.6 percent of the Operating Partnership, respectively.

CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The Company has ownership interests in certain joint ventures which it consolidates.  Various entities and/or individuals hold noncontrolling interests in these ventures.


14.  
SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company operates in two business segments: (i) real estate and (ii) construction services.  The Company provides leasing, property and facilities management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its portfolio.  In May 2006, in conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of the Gale Company and related businesses, the Company acquired a business specializing solely in construction and related services whose operations comprise the Company’s construction services segment.  The Company had no revenues from foreign countries recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  The Company had no long lived assets in foreign locations as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.  The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies, excluding depreciation and amortization.

The Company evaluates performance based upon net operating income from the combined properties in the real estate segment and net operating income from its construction services segment.

 
33

 

Selected results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and selected asset information as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 regarding the Company’s operating segments are as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
Construction
Corporate
Total
 
 
Real Estate
Services
 & Other (d)
Company
 
Total revenues:
         
 Three months ended:
         
March 31, 2010
$184,352 
$10,922
$       619
$195,893
 
March 31, 2009
    182,059 
11,517
    (6,910) 
  186,666
 
           
Total operating and interest expenses(a):
         
 Three months ended:
         
March 31, 2010
$   71,664 
$10,953
$46,780
$129,397
(e)
March 31, 2009
     61,762 
11,659
   45,262
   118,683
(f)
           
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated