Magic Software Enterprises 20-F 2010
Documents found in this filing:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Date of event requiring this shell company report
Commission file number: 0-19415
MAGIC SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter
and translation of Registrant’s name into English)
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
5 Haplada Street, Or Yehuda 60218, Israel
(Address of principal executive offices)
Amit Birk; +972 (3) 538 9322; firstname.lastname@example.org
5 Haplada Street, Or Yehuda 60218, Israel
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0. 1 per share…………..31,936,426 >(as of December 31, 2009)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No x
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 o Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
This annual report on Form 20-F is incorporated by reference into the registrant’s Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 333-13270, 333-11220, 333-1946, 333-10794, 333-113552, 333-132221 and 333-149553.
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. develops markets, sells and supports an application platform and business and process integration solutions. Our products and services are available through a global network of our regional offices, independent software vendors, or ISVs, system integrators, or SIs, distributors and value added resellers, or VARs, as well as original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and consulting partners in approximately 50 countries. Our technology provides our partners and customers with the ability to create any type of business application, leverage existing information technology, or IT resources, enhance business ability, and focus on core business priorities to gain maximum return on their existing and new IT investments. We are known for our code-free approach, allowing users to focus on business logic rather than technological requirements. This approach forms the driving principle of both our uniPaaS application platform and our iBOLT business and process integration suites. Our ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “MGIC” and are also traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.
As used in this annual report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and Magic mean Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.
We have obtained trademark registrations for Magic® in the United States, Canada, Israel, the Netherlands (Benelux), Switzerland, Thailand and the United Kingdom. All other trademarks and trade names appearing in this annual report are owned by their respective holders.
Our consolidated financial statements appearing in this annual report are prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. All references in this annual report to “dollars” or “$” are to U.S. dollars and all references in this annual report to “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels.
Statements made in this annual report concerning the contents of any contract, agreement or other document are summaries of such contracts, agreements or documents and are not complete descriptions of all of their terms. If we filed any of these documents as an exhibit to this annual report or to any previous filling with the Securities and Exchange Commission, you may read the document itself for a complete recitation of its terms.
This annual report on Form 20-F contains various "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, with respect to our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such forward-looking statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and financial results. Statements which use the terms “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. We remind readers that forward-looking statements are merely predictions and therefore inherently subject to uncertainties and other factors and involve known and unknown risks that could cause the actual results, performance, levels of activity, or our achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, levels of activity, or our achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we undertake no obligation to publicly release any update or revision to any forward looking statements to reflect new information, future events or circumstances, or otherwise after the date hereof. We have attempted to identify significant uncertainties and other factors affecting forward-looking statements in the Risk Factors section that appears in Item 3D. “Key Information - Risk Factors.”
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The following table presents selected consolidated financial data as of the dates and for each of the periods indicated. This data includes discontinued operations for certain of the presented periods (see Note 3(a) and 3(c) to the consolidated financial statements). The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with and are qualified entirely by reference to Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
We have derived the following consolidated income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 from our audited consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this annual report, with the relevant adjustments due to the discontinued operations. We have derived the consolidated income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report, with the relevant adjustments due to the discontinued operations.
Income Statement Data:
Balance Sheet Data:
Investing in our ordinary shares involves a high degree of risk and uncertainty. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before investing in our ordinary shares. Our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected due to any of the following risks. In that case, the value of our ordinary shares could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry
We have a history of losses and may not be able to maintain profitability in the future.
Although we reported net income during the three years ended December 31, 2009, we incurred losses in the two prior years. No assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain our current level of revenues or profitability in the future.
We have a history of quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations and expect these fluctuations to continue.
We have experienced and in the future may continue to experience significant fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations and we expect these fluctuations to continue. Factors that may contribute to fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations include:
Our customers ordinarily require the delivery of our products promptly after we accept their orders. With the exception of contracts for services, we usually do not have a backlog of orders for our products. Consequently, revenues from our products in any quarter depend on orders received and products provided by us and accepted by the customers in that quarter. The deferral of the placing and acceptance of any large order from one quarter to another could materially adversely affect our results of operations for the former quarter. Our customers sometimes require an acceptance test for services we provide and as a result, we may have a significant backlog of orders for our services. Our revenues from services depend on orders received and services provided by us and accepted by our customers in that quarter. If sales in any quarter do not increase correspondingly or if we do not reduce our expenses in response to level or declining revenues in a timely fashion, our financial results for that quarter may be materially adversely affected. For these reasons, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and you should not rely on the results of our operations in any particular quarter as an indication of future performance.
Unfavorable national and global economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
The recent crisis in the financial and credit markets in the United States, Europe and Asia led to a global economic slowdown showing significant signs of weakness. Although global economic conditions have begun to stabilize or improve, the markets in which we operate remain weak. If the economies in the countries in which we operate continue to be weak or weaken further, the demand for our products, technology and services may decrease as a result of continued constraints on capital spending by our customers. In addition, this could result in longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition for our products and services. Any of these events would likely harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in the United States, Europe or Asia or other key markets remain weak or weaken further, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Recent worldwide economic downturn may adversely affect our customers, exposing us to credit risk and payment delinquencies on our accounts receivable.
Our outstanding accounts receivables are not covered by collateral. If economic conditions deteriorate further, certain of our customers may face liquidity concerns and may delay or be unable to satisfy their payment obligations, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
Changes in the ratio of our revenues generated from different revenue elements may adversely affect our gross profit margins.
We derive our revenues from the sale of software licenses, maintenance and technical support and consulting services. Our gross margin is affected by the proportion of our revenues generated from the sale of each of those elements of our revenues. Our revenues from the sale of our software licenses and maintenance and technical support have higher gross margins than our revenues from the sale of consulting services. If the relative proportion of our revenues from the sale of consulting services increases as a percentage of our total revenues, our gross profit margins will decline. Our software licenses revenues include the sale of the third party software license sales, which have a lower gross margin than the sales of our software products. Any increase in the portion of third party software license sales out of total license sales will decrease our gross profit margin.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from independent distributors who are under no obligation to purchase our products and the loss of such independent distributors could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We sell our products through our direct sales representatives, as well as through third parties that use our technology to develop and sell solutions for their customers, referred to as ISVs or Magic Software Providers, or MSPs, and also through SIs. These independent distributors then resell our products to end-users. We are dependent upon the acceptance of our products by our independent distributors and their active marketing and sales efforts. Typically, our arrangements with our independent distributors do not require them to purchase specified amounts of products or prevent them from selling non-competitive products. The independent distributors may not continue, or may not give a high priority to, marketing and supporting our products. Our results of operations could be materially adversely affected by changes in the financial condition, business, marketing strategies, local and global economic conditions, or results of our independent distributors.
We may lose independent distributors on whom we currently depend and we may not succeed in developing new distribution channels which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If any of our distribution relationships are terminated, we may not be successful in replacing them on a timely basis, or at all. In addition, we will need to develop new sales channels for new products, and we may not succeed in doing so. Any changes in our distribution and sales channels, or our inability to establish effective distribution and sales channels for new markets, could adversely impact our ability to sell our products and result in a loss of revenues and profits.
We are dependent on a limited number of product families and a decrease in revenues from these products would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We derive our revenues from sales of application platform and integration products primarily under our uniPaaS and iBOLT brands, professional services, as well as related revenues from software maintenance and support and other services. Our future growth depends heavily on our ability to effectively develop and sell new products developed by us or acquired from third parties as well as add new features to existing products. A decrease in revenues from our principal products would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The revenue of two of our vertical subsidiaries is dependent upon three customers and a significant decrease in revenues from these customers could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The majority of revenues generated by one of our vertical subsidiaries in 2007, 2008 and 2009 was from two customers. One of such customers accounted for 8%, 9% and 11%% of our revenues in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In 2010, we expect the revenues of two of our vertical subsidiaries to be largely dependent upon three customers. We do not know if, or for how much longer, such three customers will continue to purchase the services of the subsidiaries, nor do we have any control or influence over their purchasing decisions. A significant decrease in revenues from these customers could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our widespread operations may strain our management, operational and financial resources and could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our widespread operations have significantly strained our management, operational and financial resources in the past. Any future growth may increase this strain. To manage future growth effectively, we must:
We may not succeed in managing future growth, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may encounter difficulties with our international operations and sales which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
While our principal executive offices are located in Israel, 92% of our sales in 2007 and 2008 and 93% of our sales in 2009 were generated in other countries. This subjects us to many risks inherent to international business activities, including:
We may encounter significant difficulties in connection with the sale of our products in international markets as a result of one or more of these factors and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations in the world markets in which we conduct business could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars, our functional currency. However, a substantial portion of our revenues and expenses are incurred in other currencies, particularly the Euro, Japanese Yen, NIS and British pound. We also maintain substantial non-U.S. dollar balances of assets, including cash and accounts receivable, and liabilities, including accounts payable. Therefore, fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we do business relative to the U.S. dollar may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, by decreasing the U.S. dollar value of assets held in other currencies and increasing the U.S. dollar amount of liabilities payable in other currencies, or by decreasing the U.S. dollar value of our revenues in other currencies and increasing the U.S. dollar amount of our expenses in other currencies. For example, during 2007 and 2008, the NIS appreciated against the U.S. dollar, which resulted in a significant increase in the U.S. dollar cost of our NIS expenses, while during 2009 the NIS depreciated against the U.S dollar, which resulted in a relative decrease in the U.S. dollar cost of our NIS expenses. Even if we use derivatives or other instruments to hedge part or all of our exposures from time to time, they may not effectively eliminate such risk, if at all.
Declines in our share price and/or operating performance could result in a future impairment of our goodwill or long-lived assets.
We assess potential impairments of goodwill annually and whenever there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment condition may exist. We assess potential impairments of our long-lived assets, including property and equipment and capitalized software, whenever there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In the past and during the recent capital market downturn, our share price, and consequently our market capitalization, have experienced significant fluctuations and may experience significant fluctuations in the future. If the value of our market capitalization falls below the value of our shareholders’ equity, it might indicate that an impairment of goodwill is required. We determine the value of each of our reporting units using the income approach, which utilizes a discounted cash flow model, as we believe that this approach best approximates our fair value at this time. Our ability to reconcile the gap between our market capitalization and aggregate fair value of the reporting units depends on various factors, some of which are qualitative, such as estimated control premium that an investor would be willing to pay for a controlling interest in us, while others involve management judgment. If our market capitalization stays below our shareholders’ equity, or actual results of operations materially differ from our modeling estimates, we may be required to record a non-cash impairment charge of our goodwill. A significant impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and on the carrying value of our goodwill and/or our long-lived assets on our balance sheet.
We face intense competition in the markets for our application platform as well as process and business integration technologies and services, which are evolving into a new market for software as a service, or SaaS. This competition could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We compete with other companies in the areas of application platforms, business integration and business process management, or BPM, tools, and in the applications and services markets in which we operate. The enhancement of the SaaS market increases the competition in these areas, and some of our competitors claim to offer a fully automated eDeveloper conversion process, converting eDeveloper based applications to .NET based applications. We expect that competition will increase in the future, both with respect to our technology, applications and services which we currently offer and applications and services which we and other vendors are developing. Increased competition, direct and indirect, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Some of our existing and potential competitors are larger companies, have substantially greater resources than us, including financial, technological, marketing, skilled human resources and distribution capabilities, and enjoy greater market recognition than us. We may not be able to differentiate our products from those of our competitors, offer our products as part of integrated systems or solutions to the same extent as our competitors, or successfully develop or introduce new products that are more cost-effective, or offer better performance than our competitors. Failure to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not succeed in increasing our market share in the business and process integration markets with our iBOLT products, or leverage our advantage in the rich internet application, mobile, cloud and SaaS enabled application platform fields, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our iBOLT Integration Suite provides business integration and process management with a particular focus on enterprise business applications. iBOLT allows the integration and interoperability of diverse solutions, including legacy applications, in a quick and efficient manner. Since we launched iBOLT in 2003, we have continued to develop this product and enhance it, releasing successive versions over the years (the current version is 3.1). In 2005, we started a line of special editions of iBOLT tailored for specific application packages, and we have released several such special editions, for SAP, Oracle JD Edwards, Salesforce.com, IBM i, HL7, Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino and Microsoft Dynamics CRM.
The business integration and BPM markets in which we operate are extremely competitive and subject to rapid changes. Our competitors utilize varying approaches to the provision of technology to business integration and BPM markets. We may not have the resources, skills and product variety required to successfully increase our market share in these markets. In addition, even if we succeed in convincing prospective customers and the market that our products are effective and provide real business benefits, our target customers may not choose them due to technical, cost, support or other reasons.
Our future success will be largely dependent on the acceptance of future releases of our Rich Internet Application, or RIA and cloud offerings and if we are unsuccessful with these efforts our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected
In 2008, we released a new generation of our eDeveloper application platform, branded uniPaaS. uniPaaS is compatible with previous versions of eDeveloper, adds cloud-based capabilities including RIA and mobile, and in the future will include platform as a service, or PaaS capabilities. Our future success will be in great measure dependent on the acceptance of uniPaaS. The acceptance of this product relies in part on the continued acceptance and growth of cloud markets including RIA, mobile and SaaS, for which uniPaaS is particularly useful and advantageous. If this product is not accepted, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected.
Our efforts to increase our presence worldwide, including the United States, Europe, Japan, Asia and South Africa may not be profitable, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our success in becoming a stronger competitor in the sale of application platform and integration solutions is dependent upon our ability to increase our sales in all our markets, including, but not limited to the United States, Europe, Japan, Asia and South Africa. Our efforts to increase our penetration into these markets are subject to risks inherent to such markets, including the high cost of doing business in such locations. Our efforts may be costly and they may not result in profits, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Rapid technological changes may adversely affect the market acceptance of our products and services, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We compete in a market that is characterized by rapid technological change. The introduction of new technologies could render existing products and services obsolete and unmarketable and could exert price pressures on our products and services. Our future success will depend upon our ability to address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers by:
If release dates of any future products or enhancements are delayed or if, when released, they fail to achieve market acceptance, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
Our products have a lengthy sales cycle which could adversely affect our revenues.
Our customers typically use our technology to develop and deploy as well as integrate applications that are critical to their businesses. As a result, the licensing and implementation of our technology generally involves a significant commitment of attention and resources by prospective customers. Because of the long approval process that typically accompanies strategic initiatives or capital expenditures by companies, our sales process is often delayed, with little or no control over any delays encountered by us. Our sales cycle can be further extended for sales made through third party distributors.
Our products may contain defects that may be costly to correct, delay market acceptance of our products and expose us to difficulties in the collection of receivables and to litigation.
Despite quality assurance testing performed by us, as well as by our partners and end-users who participate in our beta-testing programs, errors may be found in our software products or in applications developed with our technology. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that a significant percentage of the applications developed with our technology were and are likely to continue to be developed by our ISV partners and SIs over whom we exercise no supervision or control. If defects are discovered, we may not be able to successfully correct them in a timely manner or at all. Defects and failures in our products could result in a loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of our products, as well as difficulties in the collection of receivables and litigation, and could damage our reputation. The professional liability insurance that we maintain may not be sufficient against potential claims.
Our standard license agreement with our customers contains provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential product liability claims that may not be effective or enforceable under the laws of some jurisdictions. Accordingly, we could fail to realize revenues and suffer damage to our reputation as a result of, or in defense of, a substantial claim.
Our proprietary technology is difficult to protect and unauthorized use of our proprietary technology by third parties may impair our ability to compete effectively.
Our success and ability to compete depend in large part upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of trade secret and copyright laws and confidentiality, non-disclosure and assignment-of-inventions agreements to protect our proprietary technology. We do not have any patents. Our policy is to require employees and consultants to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of their relationships with us. These measures may not be adequate to protect our technology from third-party infringement, and our competitors might independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours. Additionally, our products may be sold in foreign countries that provide less protection for intellectual property rights than that provided under U.S. or Israeli laws.
Third parties may claim that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights and could harm our business.
From time to time, third parties may assert infringement claims against us or claims that we have violated a patent or infringed upon a copyright, trademark or other proprietary right belonging to them. Any infringement claim, even one without merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources to defend any such claims.
We may be unable to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In the event our business grows in the future, we will need to hire additional qualified personnel. The process of locating, training and successfully integrating qualified personnel into our operations can be lengthy and expensive. We may not be able to attract the personnel we need. Any loss of members of senior management or key technical personnel, or any failure to attract or retain highly qualified employees as needed, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We made and expect to make acquisitions that could disrupt our operations and harm our operating results.
Our growth depends upon the growth of the market in which we operate, our ability to enhance our existing products and our ability to introduce new products on a timely basis. We intend to continue to address the need to develop new products and enhance existing products through acquisitions of other companies, product lines, technologies, and personnel. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:
Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky and subject to many factors outside of our control and no assurance can be given that our future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results, or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could materially harm our business and operating results. Prior acquisitions have resulted in a wide range of outcomes, from successful introduction of new products and technologies to a failure to do so. Even when an acquired company has already developed and marketed products, there can be no assurance that product enhancements will be made in a timely fashion or that pre-acquisition due diligence will have identified all possible issues that might arise with respect to such products.
Because we are controlled by Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. and Emblaze Ltd., investors will not be able to affect the outcome of shareholder votes.
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., or Formula Systems (symbol: FORTY), an Israeli company whose shares trade on the NASDAQ Global Market and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE, directly owns 18,560,352, or 58.1%, of our outstanding ordinary shares. Emblaze Ltd., or Emblaze, an Israeli company traded on the London Stock Exchange, owns 50.7% of the outstanding shares of Formula Systems. Although transactions between us and our controlling shareholders are subject to special approvals under Israeli law (see Item 6C. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices - Disclosure of Personal Interests of a Controlling Shareholder; Approval of Transactions with Controlling Shareholders”), Formula Systems and Emblaze will be able to exercise control over our operations and business strategy and affairs, including any determinations with respect to potential mergers or other business combinations involving us, our acquisition or disposition of assets, our incurrence of indebtedness, our issuance of any additional ordinary shares or other equity securities, our repurchase or redemption of ordinary shares and our payment of dividends. Similarly, Formula Systems and Emblaze will be able to control most matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of our directors (subject to a special majority required for the election of outside directors). Such concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing an acquisition or a change in control of us.
If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned and our share price may suffer.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes certain duties on us and on our executives and directors. Our efforts to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 governing internal control and procedures for financial reporting, which started in connection with our 2007 Annual Report on Form 20-F, have resulted in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention, and we expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of significant resources. We may identify material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our assessments of our internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in investigation or sanctions by regulatory authorities, and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, investor confidence in our reported financial information and the market price of our ordinary shares.
Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares
Our share price has been very volatile in the past and may continue to be susceptible to significant market price and volume fluctuations in the future.
Our ordinary shares have experienced significant market price and volume fluctuations in the past and may experience significant market price and volume fluctuations in the future in response to factors such as the following, some of which are beyond our control:
Domestic and international stock markets often experience extreme price and volume fluctuations. The market prices of ordinary shares of software companies have been extremely volatile. Stock prices of many software companies have often fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against registrants following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.
The trading volume of our shares has been low in the past and may be low in the future, resulting in lower than expected market prices for our shares.
Our shares have traded at low volumes in the past and may trade at low volumes in the future for reasons that may be related or unrelated to our performance. This may result in a lack of liquidity, which could negatively effect the market price for our ordinary shares
We have not established a dividend policy and may not pay cash dividends in the future.
Although we paid a cash dividend in January 2010, we did not pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the last five fiscal years and we do not currently have a dividend distribution policy in place. Future dividend distributions are subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on various factors, including our operating results, future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and tax implications of dividend distributions on our income, future prospects and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. The distribution of dividends also may be limited by Israeli law, which permits the distribution of dividends only out of profits (as defined by Israeli law) or otherwise upon the permission of the court. You should not rely on an investment in our company if you require dividend income from your investment.
Our ordinary shares are traded on more than one market and this may result in price variations.
Our ordinary shares are traded primarily on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Trading in our ordinary shares on these markets is made in different currencies (U.S. dollars on the NASDAQ Global Market, and New Israeli Shekels, or NIS, on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange), and at different times (resulting from different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the United States and Israel). Consequently, the trading prices of our ordinary shares on these two markets may differ. Any decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares on the other market.
If U.S. tax authorities were to treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” that could have adverse consequences on U.S. holders.
Holders of our ordinary shares who are U.S. residents face income tax risks. There is a risk that we will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company,” commonly referred to as PFIC. Our treatment as a PFIC could result in a reduction in the after-tax return to the U.S. holders of our ordinary shares and would likely cause a reduction in the value of our shares. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will generally be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year in which either: (i) 75% or more of our gross income is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of our assets for the taxable year produce or are held for the production of passive income. If we were determined to be a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, highly complex rules would apply to U.S. holders owning our ordinary shares and such U.S. holders could suffer adverse U.S. tax consequences. Accordingly, you are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the application of such rules. United States residents should carefully read “Item 10E. Additional Information - Taxation, United States Federal Income Tax Consequences” for a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax risks related to owning and disposing of our ordinary shares.
Risks Related to Our Location in Israel
Political, economic and military instability in Israel may disrupt our operations and negatively affect our business condition, harm our results of operations and adversely affect our share price.
We are incorporated under the laws of, and our executive offices and research and development facilities are located in, the State of Israel. Although most of our sales are made to customers outside Israel, we are influenced to a limited extent by the political, economic and military conditions affecting Israel. Specifically, we could be adversely affected by any major hostilities involving Israel, the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners, or a significant downturn in the economic or financial condition of Israel.
Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Israel and its Arab neighbors have engaged in a number of armed conflicts. A state of hostility, varying from time to time in intensity and degree, has led to security and economic problems for Israel. Major hostilities between Israel and its neighbors may hinder Israel’s international trade and lead to economic downturn. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and business. There has been an increase in unrest and terrorist activity in Israel, which began in September 2000 and which continued with varying levels of severity through 2009. The future effect of this deterioration and violence on the Israeli economy and our operations is unclear. In the summer of 2006, Israel was engaged in an armed conflict with Hezbollah, which involved missile strikes against civilian targets in northern Israel and negatively affected business conditions in Israel. The establishment in 2006 of a government in the Gaza Strip by representatives of the Hamas, which effectively took control of the Gaza Strip from the Palestinian Authority in 2007 following Israel’s disengagement from the Gaza Strip in 2005, created additional unrest and uncertainty in the region. In December 2008 and January 2009, there was an armed conflict between Israel and Hamas, following the firing of thousands of missile into southern Israel. The missile attacks by Hamas have not targeted the greater Tel Aviv area, the location of our principal executive offices; however, any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions and could significantly harm our results of operations.
Furthermore, there are a number of countries, primarily in the Middle East, as well as Malaysia and Indonesia, that restrict business with Israel or Israeli companies, and we are precluded from marketing our products to these countries. Restrictive laws or policies directed towards Israel or Israeli businesses may have an adverse impact on our operations, our financial results or the expansion of our business.
Our results of operations may be negatively affected by the obligation of our personnel to perform military service.
Many of our executive officers and employees in Israel are obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israeli Defense Forces and may be called for active duty under emergency circumstances at any time. If a military conflict or war arises, these individuals could be required to serve in the military for extended periods of time. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence for a significant period of one or more of our executive officers or key employees or a significant number of other employees due to military service. Any disruption in our operations could adversely affect our business.
We currently have the ability to benefit from government tax benefits, which may be cancelled or reduced in the future.
We are eligible to receive tax benefits under Government of Israel programs. In order to maintain our eligibility for these tax benefits, we must continue to meet specific conditions. If we fail to comply with these conditions in the future, the tax benefits we could receive may be cancelled.
Service and enforcement of legal process on us and our directors and officers may be difficult to obtain.
We are incorporated in Israel and some of our directors, executive officers and the Israeli experts named in this annual report reside outside the United States. Service of process upon them may be difficult to effect within the United States. Furthermore, most of our assets and the assets of some of our executive officers and directors and some of the experts named in this annual report are located outside the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us or any of them in the United States, including one based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for you to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel. For more information regarding the enforceability of civil liabilities against us, our directors and executive officers and the Israeli experts named in this prospectus, including the terms under which certain judgments may be enforced by an Israeli court, please see “Enforceability of Civil Liabilities.”
Provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of us, which could prevent a change of control and therefore depress the price of our shares.
Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to some of our shareholders. These provisions of Israeli corporate and tax law may have the effect of delaying, preventing or complicating a merger with, or other acquisition of, us. This could cause our ordinary shares to trade at prices below the price for which third parties might be willing to pay to gain control of us. Third parties who are otherwise willing to pay a premium over prevailing market prices to gain control of us may be unable or unwilling to do so because of these provisions of Israeli law.
Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law.
We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our memorandum of association, articles of association and by Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith in exercising his or her rights and fulfilling his or her obligations toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on certain matters. Israeli law provides that these duties are applicable in shareholder votes at the general meeting with respect to, among other things, amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and actions and transactions involving interests of officers, directors or other interested parties which require the shareholders’ general meeting’s approval. In addition, a controlling shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who knows that he or she possesses the power to determine the outcome of a vote at a meeting of our shareholders, or who has, by virtue of the company’s articles of association, the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder in the company, or any other power with respect to the company, has a duty of fairness toward the company. The Israeli Companies Law does not establish criteria for determining whether or not a shareholder has acted in good faith. Moreover, the law is relatively new and there is no case law available on the duty of a non-controlling shareholder to act in good faith.
As a foreign private issuer whose shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, we may follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain NASDAQ requirements.
As a foreign private issuer whose shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. We follow Israeli law and practice instead of The NASDAQ Listing Rules regarding the requirement that our independent directors have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present. As a foreign private issuer listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, we may also follow home country practice with regard to, among other things, the composition of the board of directors, director nomination procedure, compensation of officers and quorum at shareholders’ meetings. In addition, we may follow our home country law, instead of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, which require that we obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as for the establishment or amendment of certain equity based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company. A foreign private issuer that elects to follow a home country practice instead of such requirements must submit to NASDAQ in advance a written statement from an independent counsel in such issuer’s home country certifying that the issuer’s practices are not prohibited by the home country’s laws. In addition, a foreign private issuer must disclose in its annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission each such requirement that it does not follow and describe the home country practice followed by the issuer instead of any such requirement. Accordingly, our shareholders may not be afforded the same protection as provided under NASDAQ’s corporate governance rules.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel in February 1983 as Mashov Software Export (1983) Ltd. and we changed our name to Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. in 1991. We are a public limited liability company and operate under the Israeli Companies Law 1999 and associated legislation. Our registered offices and principal place of business are located at 5 Haplada Street, Or Yehuda 60218, Israel, and our telephone number is +972-3-538-9292. Our U.S. subsidiary, Magic Software Enterprises Inc., is located at 23046 Avenida de la Carlota, Laguna Hills, CA 926653. Our address on the Internet is www.magicsoftware.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report.
We develop, market and support uniPaaS, an application platform for software application development and deployment, and iBOLT, a platform for business integration and BPM. The uniPaaS and iBOLT platforms enable enterprises to accelerate the process of building and deploying applications that can be rapidly customized and integrated with existing systems. As an IT technology innovator, we have over 25 years of experience in assisting software and enterprise companies worldwide to produce and integrate their business applications. Our application platform, uniPaaS, is used by thousands of enterprises and ISVs to develop solutions for their users and customers in approximately 50 countries. We also refer to these ISVs as MSPs. We also provide maintenance and technical support as well as professional services to our enterprise customers and MSPs. In addition, we sell our iBOLT technology for business integration to customers using specific popular software applications, such as SAP, Salesforce.com, IBM i (AS/400) or Oracle JD Edwards or other business applications. We refer to these vendor-centered market sectors as eco-systems.
In June 2009, we released a new version of uniPaaS, V1.8 that included .NET integration for PC and mobile RIA clients. In April 2010, we released uniPaaS V1.9. This version has enhanced RIA functionality that brings application user experience to the level of desktop applications and makes the migration from client/server applications to RIA faster and easier.
In 2009, we released iBOLT Version 3 and Version 3.1. Since then we have continued to develop the iBOLT channel and have entered into agreements with additional SIs, consultancies and service providers who acquired iBOLT skills and offer iBOLT licenses and related services to their customers. During 2009, we also released additional iBOLT special editions, including HL7, Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino and Microsoft Dynamics CRM. We also continued to focus the iBOLT integration tool on the SAP ERP R/3 market, and to date we have completed a dozen new deployments of iBOLT for SAP ERP R3.
In February 2009, we released our Data Replicator for Salesforce.com integration solution, allowing users to back-up their Salesforce.com data on-premise. We have continued to develop partnerships with SIs in the Salesforce.com eco-system and are continuing to experience increasing sales in this sector.
In 2009, we increased our penetration into the global JD Edwards market, particularly in the United States where we gained a number of new partners specializing in JD Edwards solutions and where we continue to win significant deals.
In 2009, we continued to work closely with IBM as an Advanced Partner of the IBM Partnerworld for Developer Business Partner program and as a Member Partner of IBM Partnerworld for Software. IBM has awarded us with its ServerProven® certification for our uniPaaS and iBOLT products following a rigorous testing and evaluation process. Only those products that are validated by IBM to install quickly, start up easily and run reliably on IBM servers are awarded this certification, designed by IBM to assist its customers to easily identify complete solutions for their business-critical e-business needs. We are also part of IBM’s System i Tools Innovation Program. As part of our activities with IBM’s customers and business partners, we released a special edition of iBOLT for Oracle JD Edwards, targeted at users of JD Edwards Enterprise One Oracle enterprise resource planning, or ERP, software on the IBM System i platform.
In December 2009, we sold and leased back our headquarters and principal administrative, finance, sales, marketing and research and development office building located in Or Yehuda, Israel, a suburb of Tel Aviv. The office building was sold for the total consideration of $5.2 million, of which $4.9 million was received in December, 2009 and the remaining $0.3 million is being held trust subject to receipt of certain approvals from the Israeli tax authorities and local municipality that we have no outstanding obligations. We currently occupy approximately 39,321 square feet of space in such building under a lease agreement expiring in December 2014.
In February 2010, we, through our vertical U.S. subsidiary, completed the acquisition of the consulting and staffing services business of a U.S.-based IT services company for approximately $11.8 million in cash to be paid over a three year period. The acquired business provides a comprehensive range of consulting and staffing services for telecom, network communications and the IT industry. The business employs approximately 233 persons with offices throughout the United States. We believe that the acquisition of this business activity will enable us to expand our presence in the U.S. market and leverage our relationships with top tier customers.
Our capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, were approximately $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. These expenditures were principally for network equipment and computers, furniture and office equipment and leasehold improvements.
In recent years the multiplication of enterprise applications has lead to a level of complexity of an enterprise’s information system that is obstructing business progress and evolution, reducing business agility and often resulting in multiple versions of similar data objects, such as customer records. We believe that one of the main challenges the modern enterprise faces today is “creating a single view of the truth,” which is the better way to make effective and relevant business decisions. Business integration is employed to facilitate this. Traditionally, given their cost and complexity, business integration solutions were targeted at large enterprises. Consequently, business integration tools are mostly complex, require significant implementation resources, take a long time to implement and are costly. Given the critical need for business integration across the demand and supply chain, enterprises of all sizes require such solutions. We recognized this trend and emerging need when we designed iBOLT.
Another major evolution in enterprises is the trend of reusing IT assets, such as enterprise applications, which is driving the move towards service oriented architecture, or SOA. Due to the large investments in enterprise applications, such as ERP and CRM, on the one hand, and the accelerating business change, on the other hand, organizations need to find a way to continue to leverage their IT investments while increasing their ability to change business processes and support new ones. The software industry’s response is a new SOA, a new paradigm of application development, service oriented development architecture, and composite applications. Most of these involve metadata (which is data that describes other data, similar to a table of content describing a book), rather than traditional programming. We have developed and enhanced this paradigm over the last 25 years, and we believe that we have one of the largest installed-base of products employing such technology.
Additionally, mobile, cloud and SaaS are each becoming a well-established phenomenon in some areas of enterprise IT. These are growing into mainstream options for software-based business solutions and will affect most of enterprise IT departments in the next three years in one way or another. It appears that SaaS and cloud enabled application platforms are becoming dominant players in the growing SaaS application industry. We are developing our technology to provide the functionality of a cloud-enabled application platform as a result of the growing demand from application vendors to repackage their applications as a SaaS offering. In 2009, we continued to be recognized by independent industry analysts such a Gartner as one of the few vendors to provide a comprehensive application platform for SaaS and cloud computing.
Our technology enables enterprises to accelerate the process of building and deploying business software applications that can be rapidly customized to meet current and future needs. Our development, deployment and integration products empower customers to dramatically improve their business performance and return on investment by enabling the affordable and rapid delivery and integration of business applications, systems and databases. Our technology and solutions are especially in demand when time-to-market considerations are critical, budgets are tight, integration is required with multiple platforms or applications, databases or existing systems and business processes, as well as for RIA, cloud computing and SaaS.
We address the critical business needs of companies so that they are able to quickly respond to changing market forces and demands. Robust business solutions are created, deployed and maintained with unrivaled productivity and time-to-market results. Our development paradigm is aligned with modern application development theories and enables developers to create better solutions in less time and with fewer resources.
Our technology, comprised of the iBOLT and uniPaaS solutions, is comprehensive and industry proven. These technologies can be applied to the entire software development market, from the implementation of micro-vertical solutions, through tactical application renovation and process automation solutions, to enterprise spanning SOA migrations and composite applications initiatives. Unlike most competing platforms, we offer a coherent and unified toolset stemming from the same proven metadata driven and rules-based declarative technology. Metadata platforms consist of pre-compiled and pre-written technical and administrative functions, which are essentially ready-made business application coding that enables developers to bypass the intensive technical code-writing stage of application development and integration and move quickly and efficiently to deployment. Through the use of metadata-driven platforms such as uniPaaS and iBOLT, software vendors and enterprise customers can experience unprecedented cost savings through fast and easy implementation and reduced project risk.
Development communities are facing high complexity, cost and extended pay-back periods in order to deliver cloud, RIA, mobile and SaaS applications. uniPaaS and iBOLT provide ISV’s with the ability to rapidly build integrated applications in a more productive manner, deploy them in multiple modes and architectures as needed, lower IT maintenance costs and decreasing time-to-market.
With the launch of iBOLT, we started a process of expanding from the application development field to the business integration and process management fields, which are presently converging, from a technology perspective, into the composite application field. Products for these fields require SOA, application integration capabilities, process management, orchestration capabilities and information delivery capabilities. We believe that our technology and products provide all of these capabilities.
With the impending introduction of our cloud-enabled application platform, we expect to strengthen our position as a leading application platform provider opening the path for us to address the top-tier sector of the market. The increasing adoption of the SaaS delivery and business model within the overall cloud environment requires the use of a new generation of application platforms, which support the relevant functions required for SaaS and cloud deployment. We are one of the first vendors to offer such a platform. By leveraging the easy migration of applications between the different versions of our products, our MSPs have the potential to become among the first and most versatile sources of SaaS applications. Industry analysts as well as several of our major MSPs have recognized this, and we have begun to work with some of them in this context.
The underlying principles and purpose of our technology are to provide:
We offer two complementary products that address the wide spectrum of composite applications.
uniPaaS Application Platform
The uniPaaS application platform was released during 2008 as the next generation of eDeveloper. uniPaaS was released in recognition of the growing market demand for cloud based offerings including RIA, mobile applications and SaaS. It features new functionality and extensions to our application platform, with the objective of enabling the development of RIA, SaaS, mobile and cloud enabled applications. SaaS is a relatively new business and technical model for delivering software applications, similar to a phone or cable TV model, in which the software applications are installed and operated in dedicated data centers and users subscribe to these centers and use the applications over an internet connection. This model requires the ability to deliver RIA.
uniPaaS is a comprehensive RIA platform. It uses a single development paradigm that handles all ends of the application development and deployment process including client and server partitioning and the inter-communicating layers.
uniPaaS offers customers the power to choose how they deploy their applications, whether full client or web; on-premise or on-demand; in the cloud or behind the corporate firewall; software or mobile or SaaS; global or local. Our uniPaaS application platform complies with event driven and service oriented architectural principles. By offering technology transparency, this product allows customers to focus on their business requirements rather than technological means. The uniPaaS single development paradigm significantly reduces the time and costs associated with the development and deployment of cloud-based applications, including RIA, mobile and SaaS. In addition, application owners can leverage their initial investment when moving from full client mode to cloud mode, and eventually modify these choices as the situation requires. Furthermore, enterprises can use cloud based uniPaaS applications in a SaaS model and still have their databases in the privacy of their own data centers. It also supports most hardware and operating system environments such as Windows, Unix, Linux and AS/400, as well as multiple databases. In addition, uniPaas is interoperable with .NET and Java technologies.
uniPaaS can be applied to the full range of software development, from the implementation of micro-vertical solutions, through tactical application renovation and process automation solutions, to enterprise spanning SOA migrations and composite applications initiatives. Unlike most competing platforms, we offer a coherent and unified toolset stemming from the same proven metadata driven and rules based declarative technology, resulting in unprecedented cost savings through fast and easy implementation and reduced project risk.
In June 2009, we released the Version 1.8 for uniPaaS including .NET integration for PC and mobile RIA clients.
iBOLT Business and Process Integration
The iBOLT business integration suite is a graphical, wizard-based code-free solution delivering fast and simple integration and orchestration of business processes and applications. iBOLT allows businesses to more easily view, access, and leverage their mission-critical information, delivering true enterprise application integration, or EAI, BPM, and SOA, infrastructure.
iBOLT allows the integration and interoperability of diverse solutions, including legacy applications, in a quick and efficient manner. In May 2009, we released iBOLT Version 3.1 and since then we have continued to develop the iBOLT channel and entered into agreements with additional SIs, consultancies and service providers, who acquired iBOLT skills and offer iBOLT licenses and related services to their customers.
Increasing the usability and life span of existing legacy and other IT systems, iBOLT allows fast EAI, development and customization of diverse applications, systems and databases, assuring rapid return on invested capital and time-to-market, increased profitability, and customer satisfaction. We also offer special editions of iBOLT targeted at specific enterprise application vendor ecosystems, such as SAP, JD Edwards or Salesforce.com. These special editions contain specific features and pricing tailored for these market sectors. In addition, during 2009, we released special editions for HL7, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino.
Our Value Proposition
Our technology and solutions are especially in demand when budgets are tight and time-to-market considerations are critical. Our technology enables enterprises to accelerate the process of building and deploying business software applications that can be rapidly customized to meet current and future needs. Our development and integration products empower customers to dramatically improve their business performance and return on investment by enabling the affordable and rapid integration of diverse applications, systems and databases to streamline business processes from within one comprehensive framework.
We address the critical business needs of companies so that they are able to quickly respond to changing market forces and demands. Robust business solutions are created, deployed and maintained with unrivaled productivity and time-to-market results.
uniPaaS, our unique, single development paradigm, is aligned with modern application development theories and enables developers to create better solutions in less time and with fewer resources.
uniPaaS offers our customers – ISVs, SIs and enterprises the following benefits:
We believe that iBOLT offers our customers and partners the following benefits:
Our goal is to achieve a leadership position in the application platform and business integration markets. We focus on providing technology, applications and services that enable enterprises to meet their business needs on time and budget. The key elements of our strategy to achieve this goal are to:
The software industry is characterized by rapid technological changes and is highly competitive with respect to timely product innovation. We must maintain compatibility and competitiveness in the face of ongoing changes in industry standards.
We place considerable emphasis on research and development in order to improve and expand the functionality of our technology and to develop new applications. We believe that our future success depends upon our ability to maintain our technological leadership, to enhance our existing products and to introduce new commercially viable products addressing the needs of our customers on a timely basis. We also intend to support emerging technologies as they are introduced in the same way we have supported new technologies in the past. We will continue to devote a significant portion of our resources to research and development. We believe that internal development of our technology is the most effective means of achieving our strategic objective of providing an extensive, integrated and feature-rich development technology.
During 2009, we invested mainly in the development of the following products:
Three of our subsidiaries develop, market, and support vertical applications, cargo handling solutions and IT professional services.
CoreTech Consulting Group LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, is an IT consulting firm offering flexible and creative solutions in the areas of infrastructure design and delivery, application development, technology planning and implementation services, as well as supplemental staffing services.
Fusion LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, is an IT consulting firm offering a comprehensive range of consulting and staffing services for telecom, network communications and the IT industry and serves some of the world’s leading telecom and technology corporations. We established the subsidiary in January, 2010 in connection with our acquisition of the business of a U.S.-based IT services company in February 2010.
Hermes Logistics Technologies Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary, develops and markets a comprehensive solution for air cargo handling, which is designed to increase productivity, improve efficiency and reduce costs. From physical handling, cargo documentation through customs, seamless electronic data interchange communications, dangerous goods, special handling, track and trace, security to billing, the Hermes system provides a complete and integrated solution encompassing all physical handling, documentation and messaging requirements, including real-time warehousing, service level profiling /monitoring, end-user guidance, tariff profiling, analysis, audits and reports..
Professional Services. We provide a broad range of consulting and software development project management services to customers developing, deploying and integrating distributed applications. We believe that the availability of effective consulting services is an important factor in achieving widespread market acceptance.
We offer fee-based consulting services in connection with installation assurance, application audits and performance enhancement, application migration and application prototyping and design. Consulting services are aimed at both generating additional revenues and ensuring successful implementation of uniPaaS and iBOLT projects through knowledge transfer. As part of management efforts to focus on license sales, our goal is to provide such activities as a complementary service to our customers and partners.
Services are offered as separately purchased add-on packages or as part of an overall software development and deployment technology framework. Over the last several years, we have built upon our established global presence to form business alliances with our MSPs that use our technology to develop solutions for their customers, and distributors to deliver successful solutions in focused market sectors.
Maintenance. We offer our customers annual maintenance contracts providing for upgrades and new versions of our products for an annual fee.
Technical Support. We believe that a high level of customer support is important to the successful marketing and sale of our products. Our in-house technical support group provides training and post-sale support. We believe that effective technical support during product evaluation as well as after the sale has substantially contributed to product acceptance and customer satisfaction and will continue to do so in the future.
We offer an online support system for the MSPs, providing them with the ability to instantaneously enter, confirm and track support requests via the Internet. This system supports MSPs and end-users worldwide.
As part of this online support, we offer a Support Knowledge Base tool providing the full range of technical notes and other documentation including technical papers, product information, most answers to most common customer queries and known issues that have already been reported.
Training. We conduct formal and organized training on our development tools. We develop courses, pertaining to our principal products, uniPaaS and iBOLT and provide trainer and student guidebooks. Course materials are available both in traditional, classroom courses and as web-based training modules, which can be downloaded and studied at the student’s own pace and location. The courses and course materials are designed to accelerate the learning process, using an intensive technical curriculum in an atmosphere conducive to productive training
Customers, End-Users and Markets
We market and sell our products and services in more than 50 countries worldwide. The following table presents our revenues by revenue type and geographical market for the periods indicated:
Industries that are significantly represented by our partners include finance, insurance, government, health care, logistics, manufacturing media, retail and telecommunications. Our uniPaaS and iBOLT technologies are used by a wide variety of developers, integrators and solution providers, which can generally be divided into two sectors: in the first sector are those performing in-house development (corporate IT departments) and in the second sector are MSPs (ISVs), including large SIs and smaller independent developers, and VARs that use our technology to develop or provide solutions to their customers. MSPs who are packaged software publishers use our technology to write standard packaged software products that are sold to multiple clients, typically within a vertical industry sector or a horizontal business function.
Among the thousands of customers running their business systems with our technology are the following:
Adecco Coordination Center, Adecco Nederland Beheer, Adecco Suisse, Adidas Canada, Adminisatar Services Group, Advantage-Rent-a-Car, AeroScout, Allstate Life Insurance, Anglo Canadian Houswares, Anritsu Corporation, Bank Leumi, Bank of Cyprus, BNP Immobilier, Blat Lapidot, Boeing, Carey International, CBIA, CBS Outdoor, Charlotte County Courts, City of Phoenix Police Department, Clinical Financial Services, Club Mediterrannee, Communauté urbaine de Dunkerque, Compass Group France, Creativ, CTBA, Datenlotsen, Deutsche Bank, DHL, Discovery Dijon Céréales, Ekro, Electra, Electricité de Strasbourg, Entertainment Trading, Esmee Fairbairn Foundation, EUROCLEAR, Europ Assistance Netherlands, FactoryMaster, FlatRate, FMRP, Fortis Assurances, Franken Brunnen, Fujitsu-Ten, Genworth Financial, Georg Kohl, Guardian Life Insurance Company, Harel Insurance and Finance, Heller Bank, Honda Europe Power Equipment, Hungarian Police Force, IndustriOS Software, ING Commercial Finance, Intelys, Israeli Ministry of Environment and Supreme Court, ISS, Kopel-Re’em, LORD Corporation, Menora Mivtahim, Mitsubishi, Musashi Paint, Nestle Nespresso, New Era Solutions, New York State Public Defenders Association, Norfolk and Norwich University NHS Trust, OKOSH, OTOR, Paradise Cruise, Parc des Expositions PARIS-NORD Villepinte, Primagas, Rosenbauer, San Francisco Courts, SAPA Building Systems, Sharp System Products, Sheba Medical Center, SkyVision, STS Group, Sun Life Insurance, Tami 4, Titan Software Systems, Title Solutions, Inc., UNHCR, United Nations, Vadim Software, Verlingue, Victorinox, Viparis, Vodafone, Volvo Brazil, State of Washington Courts, W3Com, Western Dental, Winslow Indian Health Service.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
We market, sell and support our products through our own direct sales force as well as through a global channel-network of ISVs, SIs, value-added distributors and resellers, as well as OEM and consulting partners. Our own sales force is based in our regional offices in the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Hungary, India and Israel, and through local distributors elsewhere, our channel-network is present in about 50 countries worldwide.
Direct Sales. For uniPaaS, our direct sales force pursues enterprise accounts and software solution providers. Our sales personnel carry out strategic sales with a direct approach to decision makers, managing a constantly monitored consultative type of sales cycle. iBOLT is mostly sold via indirect channels and through our ecosystem business relationships, but we have some direct customers with integration needs.
At December 31, 2009, we had approximately 75 sales personnel including a team of sales engineers who provide pre-sale technical support, presentations and demonstrations in order to support our sales force.
Indirect Sales. We maintain an indirect sales channel for iBOLT, through our ecosystem business relationships, as well as via SIs, value added distributors and resellers, OEM partners, as well as consultancies and service providers. We maintain an indirect sales channel for uniPaaS through ISVs and SIs, who use our application platform to develop and deploy different applications selling them to their end-user customers. We carry out marketing activities with our indirect channels and have increased the number of new channel partners for both uniPaaS and iBOLT, during 2009
Distributors. In general, we distribute our products through local distributors in those countries where we do not have a sales office. A local distributor is typically a software marketing organization with the capability to add value with consulting, training, and support. Distributors are generally responsible for the implementation of both our application platform and business and process integration suite and localization into their native languages. The distributors also translate our marketing literature and technical documentation. Distributors must undergo our program of sales and technical training. Marketing, sales, training, consulting, product and client support are provided by the local distributor. We are available for backup support for the distributor and for end-users. In coordination with the local subsidiaries and distributors, we also provide sales support for large and multinational accounts. We have approximately 21 distributors in Europe, Latin America, South Africa and Asia, many of whom are also MSPs.
VARs. In general, we resell our products through VARs that extend their capabilities with our offerings. These include SAP VARs.
Marketing Activities. We carry out a wide range of marketing activities aimed at generating awareness of our solutions offering. Among our activities we focus on online, inbound and viral marketing, PR and media relations, analyst relations, an extensive program of Internet-based webcasts, search engine optimization campaigns, Google campaigns, exhibitions, attendance at trade shows, direct mail, response mail, telemarketing campaigns and user and distributor conferences and seminars. We conduct distributor and user conferences to update our worldwide affiliates and user base concerning our new releases, marketing strategies, pricing, technical information and the like.
In order to foster improved relationships with our channel partners, we periodically sponsor local events and other marketing programs and activities. On our corporate Internet website, we host an online solutions directory, which highlights applications developed and offered by our partners, and an information sharing section, which enables our partners to participate alongside our representatives at trade shows and conferences. Furthermore, in 2009 we introduced an effective partner portal, which has six active blogs where we publish relevant business topics, and in April 2010, we launched our developers network where all developers using our software can exchange ideas, learn best practices and hear recent tips for more effective use of our technology and more.
iBOLT Ecosystems. The important ecosystem businesses pursued by us to date include:
The markets for our uniPaaS and iBOLT technologies and applications are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and rapidly changing customer requirements. These markets are therefore highly competitive, and we expect competition to intensify in the future. The enhancement of the SaaS market increases the competition in these areas, and one of our competitors even claims to offer a fully automated eDeveloper conversion process, converting eDeveloper based applications to .NET based applications. We constantly follow and analyze the market trends and our competitors in order to effectively compete in these markets and avoid losing market share to other players and to our competitors.
With the introduction of uniPaaS in mid-2008, we further shifted our activities from the integrated development environment market, in which we were competing with eDeveloper in the past, towards the application platform and web oriented architecture market. Our current competitors include Cordys, IBM, Microsoft, Adobe, Oracle, Pegasystems, Progress, Fiorano, Intersystems, Sun, Ultimus and Unify. In the iBOLT integration market, our competitors include Microsoft BizTalk, Informatica, TIBCO and Software AG. Additional competitors may enter each of our markets at any time. Moreover, our customers may seek to develop internally the products that we currently sell to them and thereafter they may also compete with us.
Our goal is to maintain our technology superiority, time to market and worldwide channel network, as well as our constant market analysis to quickly address changing market dynamics. We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting the market for our products include developer productivity, rapid results, product functionality, performance, reliability, portability, interoperability, ease-of-use, demonstrable economic benefits for developers and users relative to cost, quality of customer support and documentation, ease of installation, vendor reputation and experience, financial stability as well as intuitive and out of the box solutions to extend the capabilities of ERP and/or CRM and other application vendors for enterprise integration.
We do not hold any patents and rely upon a combination of copyright, trademark, trade secret laws and contractual restrictions to protect our rights in our software products. Our policy has been to pursue copyright protection for our software and related documentation and trademark registration of our product names. Also, our key employees and independent contractors and distributors are required to sign non-disclosure and secrecy agreements.
We provide our products to customers under a non-exclusive, non-transferable license. Usually, we have not required end-users of our products to sign license agreements. However, in some instances license agreements are required to be signed by the end-users. Generally, a “shrink wrap” license agreement is included in the product packaging, which explains that by opening the package seal, the user is agreeing to the terms contained therein. It is uncertain whether license agreements of this type are legally enforceable in all of the countries in which the software is marketed.
Our trademark rights include rights associated with our use of our trademarks and rights obtained by registration of our trademarks. We have obtained trademark registrations in South Africa, Canada, China, Israel, the Netherlands (Benelux), Switzerland, Thailand, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. The initial terms of the registration of our trademarks range from 10 to 20 years and are renewable thereafter. Our use and registration of our trademarks do not ensure that we have superior rights to others that may have registered or used identical or related marks on related goods or services. We do not believe that patent laws are a significant source of protection for our products. We have registered a copyright for our software in the United States and Japan. Also, we have registered copyrights for some of our manuals in the United States and have acquired an International Standard Book Number (ISBN) for some of our manuals. Our copyrights expire 70 years from date of first publication.
Since the software industry is characterized by rapid technological changes, the policing of the unauthorized use of software is a difficult task and software piracy is expected to continue to be a persistent problem for the packaged software industry. As there can be no assurance that the above-mentioned means of legal protection will be effective against piracy of our products, and since policing unauthorized use of software is difficult, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent potential problem.
We believe that because of the rapid pace of technological change in the software industry, the legal protections for our products are less significant factors in our success than the knowledge, ability and experience of our employees, the frequency of product enhancements and the timeliness and quality of our support services.
Emblaze, an Israeli company traded on the London Stock Exchange (LSE: BLZ), has a 50.7% controlling interest in our controlling shareholder Formula Systems, an Israeli company (NASDAQ: FORTY). Formula Systems beneficially owns 58.1% or our outstanding ordinary shares. Formula Systems is an international IT company principally engaged, through its subsidiaries, in providing software consulting services, developing proprietary software products and producing computer-based solutions.
The following table sets forth the legal name, location and country of incorporation and percentage ownership of each of our subsidiaries:
In December 2009, we sold and leased back our headquarters and principal administrative, finance, sales, marketing and research and development office building located in Or Yehuda, Israel, a suburb of Tel Aviv. The office building was sold for the total consideration of $5.2 million, of which $4.9 million was received in December, 2009 and the remaining $0.3 million is being held trust subject to receipt of certain approvals from the Israeli tax authorities and local municipality that we have no outstanding obligations. We currently occupy approximately 39,321 square feet of space in such building for an aggregate annual rent of $0.4 million under a lease agreement expiring in December 2014. We have an option to terminate the lease agreement upon six months prior written notice.
In June, 2009, our Hungarian subsidiary sold its office building facility occupying 4,850 square feet in Budapest, Hungary for the total consideration of $0.5 million.
Our subsidiaries lease office space in Laguna Hills, California; King of Prussia, Pennsylvania; Dallas; Texas, Paris, France; Munich, Germany; Pune, India; Bangalore, India; Tokyo, Japan; Budapest, Hungary; Houten, the Netherlands; and Bracknell, United Kingdom. The aggregate annual cost for such facilities was $1,231 in the year ended December 31, 2009.
The following discussion of our results of operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, which appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current plans, estimates and beliefs and involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report.
We were incorporated under the laws of Israel in February 1983 and began operations in 1986. Our ordinary shares have been listed on the NASDAQ Global Market (symbol: MGIC) since our initial public offering in the United States on August 16, 1991. Since November 16, 2000, our ordinary shares have also traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. We develop market, sell and support an application platform and business and process integration solutions. We have 16 wholly-owned subsidiaries, incorporated in the United States, Europe, Asia and Israel. Our subsidiaries are engaged in developing, marketing and supporting vertical applications, as well as in selling and supporting our products, and one of our subsidiaries provides IT consulting services.
We develop market, sell and support uniPaaS, an application platform for software development and deployment, and iBOLT, a platform for business integration and BPM. Both uniPaaS and iBOLT enable enterprises to accelerate the process of building and deploying applications that can be rapidly customized and integrated with existing systems.
As an IT technology innovator, we have over 25 years of experience in assisting software companies and enterprise software companies worldwide to produce and integrate their business applications. Our application platform, uniPaaS, is used by thousands of enterprises and ISVs to develop solutions for their users and customers in approximately 50 countries. We also refer to these ISVs as MSPs. We also provide maintenance and technical support as well as professional services to our enterprise customers and to MSPs. In addition, we sell our iBOLT technology for business integration to customers using specific popular software applications, such as SAP, Salesforce.com, IBM i (AS/400) or Oracle JD Edwards or other business applications. We refer to these vendor-centered market sectors as ecosystems.
During 2009, we generated cash flows from operations of $7.5 million and repaid $0.1 million of short-term credit and long-term loans. Our cash and cash equivalents, together with our investments, were $41.9 million as of December 31, 2009, compared with $32.6 million as of December 31, 2008. The recent economic and credit crisis had a significant negative impact on business around the world. The impact of this crisis on the technology industry has been quite severe specifically in the United States, Europe and Japanese markets. If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in the United States, Europe or Asia or other key markets remain weak or weaken further, there may be a further reductions in customer spending, which could have an adverse impact on sales of our products. We believe that our strong cash position, our solid balance sheet and our financing capabilities all provide a key competitive advantage and collectively will enable us to be well positioned to manage our business through the economic downturn.
Strategy and Focus Areas
Based on our experience with managing through economic downturns in the past, we have developed a multifaceted strategy for addressing the current economic downturn that involves the following:
Our consolidated financial statements appearing in this annual report are prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. All references in this annual report to “dollars” or “$” are to U.S. dollars and all references in this annual report to “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels.
Transactions and balances originally denominated in dollars are presented at their original amounts. Transactions and balances in other currencies are converted into dollars in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 830 “Foreign Currency Matters” (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation”). The majority of our sales are made outside of Israel and a substantial part of them is in dollars. In addition, a substantial portion of our costs is incurred in dollars. Since the dollar is the primary currency of the economic environment in which we and certain of our subsidiaries operate, the dollar is our functional and reporting currency and accordingly, monetary accounts maintained in currencies other than the dollar are remeasured using the foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Operational accounts and non monetary balance sheet accounts are measured and recorded at the exchange rate in effect at the date of the transaction. For certain foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, all balance sheet accounts have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at each balance sheet date. Operational accounts have been translated using the average exchange rate prevailing during each year. The resulting translation adjustments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in equity.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimations
We have identified the policies below as critical to the understanding of our financial statements. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements and the related footnotes. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To facilitate the understanding of our business activities, certain of our accounting policies that we believe are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s subjective judgments are described below. We base our judgments on our experience and various assumptions that we believe are reasonable.
We derive our revenues mainly from licensing the rights to use our software, maintenance and technical support and professional services. We sell our products primarily through direct sales force and indirectly through distributors.
As required by ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition” (formerly SOP 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition"), we determine the value of the software component of our multiple-element arrangements using the residual method when vendor specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of fair value exists for the undelivered elements of the support and maintenance agreements. VSOE is based on the price charged when an element is sold separately or renewed. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered elements and is recognized as revenue.
We account for our software sales in accordance with ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition” (formerly SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition”). Software license revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable, no further obligation exists and collectability is probable. Maintenance and support revenue included in multiple element arrangements is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the maintenance and support agreement.
We generally do not grant a right of return to our customers. When a right of return exists, we defer revenue until the right of return expires, at which time revenue is recognized provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
Revenue from professional services consists of billable hours for services provided, recognized as the services are rendered.
Arrangements that include professional services bundled with licensed software and other software related elements, are evaluated to determine whether those services are essential to the functionality of other elements of the arrangement. When services are considered essential to the software, revenues under the arrangement are recognized using contract accounting based on ASC 605-35, “Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” (formerly SOP 81-1), on a percentage of completion method based on inputs measures. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are first determined, in the amount of the estimated loss for the entire contract. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, no such estimated losses were identified.
When professional services are not considered essential to the functionality of other elements of the arrangement, revenue allocable to the consulting services is recognized as the services are performed. In most cases, we have determined that the services are not considered essential to the functionality of other elements of the arrangement.
Deferred revenue includes unearned amounts received under maintenance and support contracts, and amounts received from customers but not yet recognized as revenues.
Research and development costs
Research and development costs incurred in the process of software development before establishment of technological feasibility are charged to expenses as incurred. Costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility are capitalized according to the principles set forth in ASC 985-20, “Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed” (formerly SFAS 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed”).
We establish technological feasibility upon completion of a detailed program design or working model.
Capitalized software costs are amortized on a product by product basis, by the greater of the amount computed using the: (i) ratio of current gross revenues from sales of the software to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues from sales of that software, or (ii) the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the product (three to five years). We assess the recoverability of this intangible asset on a regular basis by determining whether the amortization of the asset over its remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows from the specific software product sold. As of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 , no impairment losses have been identified.
We have recorded goodwill as a result of past acquisitions. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired.
We operate in one operating segment, which is comprised of two reporting units. Goodwill was allocated to the reporting units at acquisition. We follow ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (formerly SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”) and perform our goodwill annual impairment test for our two reporting units at December 31 of each year, or more often if indicators of impairment are present.
As required by ASC 350, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value (‘step 1’). If the fair value exceeds the carrying value of the reporting unit net assets, goodwill is considered not impaired, and no further testing is required. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the implied fair value of goodwill is determined by subtracting the fair value of all the identifiable net assets from the fair value of the reporting unit. An impairment loss is recorded for the excess, if any, of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value (‘step 2’).
Effective January 1, 2009, as required by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and disclosures” (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”), we apply assumptions that market place participants would consider in determining the fair value of each reporting unit.
In order to determine the fair value of our two reporting units, we implemented an ‘income approach’. Under the income approach expected future cash flows are discounted to their present value using an appropriate rate of return. Judgments and assumptions related to future cash flows (projected revenues, operating expenses, and capital expenditures), future short-term and long-term growth rates, and weighted average cost of capital, which are based on our internal assumptions, and believed to be similar to those of market participants and to represent both the specific risks associated with the business, and capital market conditions, are inherent in developing the discounted cash flow model.
In addition, we compared our market capitalization, including an estimated control premium that an investor would be willing to pay for a controlling interest in our company to the fair value of our reporting units, based on a third-party valuation study. The determination of a control premium requires the use of judgment and is based primarily on comparable industry and deal-size transactions, related synergies and other benefits. Our reconciliation of the gap between our market capitalization and the aggregate fair value of our company depends on various factors, some of which are qualitative and involve management judgment, including stable relatively high backlog coverage and experience in meeting operating cash flow targets.
We performed a sensitivity analysis for the two key assumptions used in our annual goodwill impairment test and determined that an increase in the estimated weighted average cost of capital of 2% would result in the estimated fair value of one of the reporting units falling below its carrying value. At December 31, 2009, the fair value of this reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 6%. We believe that this reporting unit is at risk for goodwill impairment in the future based on the combination of its higher goodwill balance and its 2009 operating results, which were affected by the economic conditions in the United States. Based on the sensitivity analysis, our other reporting unit is at no risk for goodwill impairment.
Since the fair value of our two reporting units exceeded their carrying amount, no impairment losses were recognized in 2007, 2008 or 2009.
Identifiable intangible assets
Intangible Assets with finite lives are comprised of distribution rights, acquired technology and customer relations, and are amortized over their useful life using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise used up. Distribution rights, acquired technology and customer relations were amortized on a straight line basis over a period of five years. As of December 31, 2009, such assets have been fully amortized.
Impairment of long-lived assets and intangible assets subject to amortization
We review our long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (formerly SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”), whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 , no impairment indicators have been identified.
As required by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements,” effective January 1, 2009, we apply assumptions that marketplace participants would consider in determining the fair value of long-lived assets (or asset groups).
We account for investments in marketable securities in accordance with ASC 320 “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities” (formerly SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities "). Our management determines the appropriate classification of its investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such determinations at each balance sheet date. Our marketable securities consist mainly of debt securities which are designated as available-for-sale and are stated at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments, as determined on a specific identification basis, are included in financial income, net, together with accretion (amortization) of discount (premium), and interest or dividends.
Declines in fair value of available-for-sale equity securities that are considered other-than-temporary, based on criteria described in SAB Topic 5M, “Other Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in Equity Securities”, are charged to earnings (based on the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost). Factors considered in making such a determination include the duration and severity of the impairment, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
For declines in value of debt securities, effective January 1, 2009, we apply an amendment to ASC 320. Under the amended impairment model, an other-than-temporary impairment loss is deemed to exists and recognized in earnings if management intends to sell or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a debt security, before recovery of its amortized cost basis.
If the criteria mentioned above, does not exist, we evaluate the collectability of the security in order to determine if the security is other than temporary impaired.
For debt securities that are deemed other-than-temporary impaired, the amount of impairment recognized in the statement of operations is limited to the amount related to “credit losses” (the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected), while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
During 2008, we recorded a $131,000 other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities. We did not record any impairment of marketable securities in 2007 and 2009.
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (formerly SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payments”). ASC 718 requires registrants to estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods in our consolidated statement of operation. We recognize compensation expenses for the value of our awards, which have graded vesting based on the accelerated method over the requisite service period of each of the awards, net of estimated forfeitures. To measure and recognize compensation expense for share-based awards we use the Binomial option-pricing model. The Binomial model for option pricing requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are the suboptimal exercise factor and expected stock price volatility. The suboptimal exercise factor is estimated based on employees' historical option exercise behavior. The suboptimal exercise factor is the ratio by which the stock price must increase over the exercise price before employees are expected to exercise their stock options. Expected volatility is based upon actual historical stock price movements and was calculated as of the grant dates for different periods, since the Binomial model can be used for different expected volatilities for different periods. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with an equivalent term to the contractual term of the options. Although we paid a cash dividend in January 2010, we have no foreseeable plans to pay dividends and therefore we use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option pricing model. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. Estimated forfeitures are based on actual historical pre-vesting forfeitures. For awards with performance conditions, compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period if it is 'probable' that the performance conditions will be satisfied, as defined in ASC 450-20-20, “Loss Contingencies” (formerly SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”).
From time to time, we are subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business, including claims relating to product liability, employees, suppliers and public authorities. In determining whether liabilities should be recorded for pending litigation claims, we assess the allegations made and the likelihood that we will be able to defend against the claim successfully. When we believe that it is probable that we will not prevail in a particular matter, we estimate the amount of liability based, in part, on advice of legal counsel.
In 2007, we recorded the results of the sale of AAOD which we sold in December 2007 and the liquidation of one of our subsidiaries as discontinued operations, according to ASC 205, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operation” (formerly SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”). Under ASC 205, in order to record a disposed activity as a discontinued operation, the activity must meet all of the following criteria:
(i) The operations and cash flows of the component have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the transaction
(ii) The entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the transaction.
According to ASC 205, activities that meet the foregoing requirements are classified as a discontinued operation for all presented periods.
Fair Value Measurements
We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value under ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurement”). Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
Level 2 - significant other observable inputs based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity;
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions).
The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. We categorized each of our fair value measurements in one of these three levels of hierarchy.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are comprised of marketable securities and foreign currency forward contracts.
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, other accounts receivable, short-term bank credit, trade payables and other accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturities of such instruments.
Accounting for income tax
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (formerly SFAS 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”). ASC 740 prescribes the use of the “asset and liability” method whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We provide a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value. Deferred tax assets are classified as current or non-current according to the expected reversal dates.
Effective January 1, 2007, we utilized a two-step approach for recognition and measurement liability for uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with an amendment of ASC 740 (originally issued as FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”). Under the first step we evaluate a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that, based on technical merits, the tax position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authorities. As a result of the adoption of ASC 740, we recorded a charge of $530,000 in our accumulated deficit for the year ended December 31, 2007. We have accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our provisions for income taxes. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits (income) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 were $50,000, $16,000 and $(217,000) thousands, respectively.
Accounting for tax positions requires judgments, including estimating reserves for potential uncertainties. We also assess our ability to utilize tax attributes, including those in the form of carry forwards, for which the benefits have already been reflected in the financial statements. We do not record valuation allowances for deferred tax assets that we believe are more likely than not to be realized in future periods. While we believe the resulting tax balances as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are appropriately accounted for in accordance with ASC740 and ASC 740-10, as applicable, the ultimate outcome of such matters could result in favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our consolidated financial statements and such adjustments could be material.
We have filed or are in the process of filing local and foreign tax returns that are subject to audit by the respective tax authorities. The amount of income tax we pay is subject to ongoing audits by the tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments. Our estimate of the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. We believe that we adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to tax audits and settlement. However, our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved, audits are closed or when statutes of limitation on potential assessments expire.
Interest associated with uncertain income tax positions and penalties expense are classified as income tax expenses. We have not recorded any material interest or penalties during 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Basic and diluted net earnings per share
Basic net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of Ordinary shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during each year, plus dilutive potential Ordinary shares considered outstanding during the year, in accordance with ASC 260 “Earnings Per Share” (formerly SFAS 128).
Part of the outstanding stock options has been excluded from the calculation of the diluted earnings per share because such securities are anti-dilutive. The total weighted average number of ordinary shares related to the outstanding options excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share was 839,045, 1,397,389 and 1,477,526 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Significant Revenues and Expenses
Revenues. Revenues consist from sales of software, maintenance and technical support and consulting services. Revenues may continue to be affected by factors including the current global economic downturn and related market uncertainty, which so far has resulted in cautious spending in our global markets; changes in the geopolitical environment; sales cycles; high fluctuation of exchange rates; changes in the mix of direct sales and indirect sales and variations in sales channels.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues for software sales consist primarily of software production costs, royalties and licenses payable to third parties, as well as amortization of capitalized software. Cost of revenues for maintenance and technical support and professional services consists primarily of personnel expenses, subcontracting and other related costs. Cost of revenues is affected by changes in the mix of revenues sold; price competition; sales discounts and increases in labor costs. Service gross margin may be impacted by various factors such as the change in mix between technical support services and advanced services, the timing of technical support service contract initiations and renewals and the timing of our strategic investments in headcount and resources to support this business.
Research and Development Expenses, Net. Research and development costs consist primarily of salaries of employees engaged in on-going research and development activities and other related expenses. The capitalization of software development costs is applied as reductions to gross research and development costs to calculate net research and development expenses.
The following table sets forth the gross research and development costs, capitalized software development costs, and the net research and development expenses for the periods indicated:
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for sales and marketing personnel, sales commissions, marketing programs, web site related expenses, public relations, promotional materials, travel expenses and trade show exhibit expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive, accounting, human resources and administrative personnel, professional fees, provisions for doubtful accounts, and other general corporate expenses.
Financial income (expenses), net. Net financial income (expenses) consists primarily of interest earned on cash equivalents and marketable securities, interested paid on loans received and currency translation adjustments.
Results of Operations
The following table presents selected consolidated statement of operations data for the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenues:
Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared With Year Ended December 31, 2008
Revenues. Revenues in 2009 decreased by 11% from $62.0 million in 2008 to $55.4 million in 2009. License revenues decreased by 18% from $17.9 million in 2008 to $14.7 million in 2009, primarily attributable to the generally lower demand for our products caused by the global economic downturn. As a result of this economic downturn, during 2009 we experienced a significant reduction in ongoing orders for our products, particularly in the Japanese and European markets. Revenues from sales of applications decreased by 13% from $3.0 million in 2008 to $2.6 million in 2009, primarily due to a reduction in orders in the Japanese market and exchange rate differences attributed to the depreciation of the British Pound against the U.S. dollar, which adversely affected the U.S. dollar value of our British Pound denominated revenues from sales of applications. Revenues from maintenance and technical support decreased by 5% from $14.5 million in 2008 to $13.8 million in 2009, primarily as a result of the depreciation of the Euro and British Pound against the U.S. dollar, which adversely affected the U.S. dollar value of our Euro and British Pound denominated revenues from maintenance and technical support. Revenues from consulting and other services decreased by 9%% from $26.6 million in 2008 to $24.3 million in 2009, primarily as a result of the advancement of a number of customers’ projects to production stage, consequently reducing the technology consulting needs of these customers, and the lower demand caused by the global economic downturn.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues decreased by 3% from $27.1 million in 2008 to $26.3 million in 2009. Cost of revenues for licenses increased by 28% from $3.2 million in 2008 to $4.1 million in 2009, primarily due to an increase in amortization of capitalized software development expenses from $2.4 million in 2008 to $3.7 million in 2009. Cost of revenues for applications decreased by 24% from $1.7 million in 2008 to $1.3 million in 2009, due to the decrease in application revenues and increased margins on sales of applications. Cost of revenues for maintenance and technical support were $2.2 in 2009, the same as in 2008. Cost of revenues for consulting and other services decreased by 7% from $20.0 million in 2008 to $18.7 million in 2009, consistent with the decrease in consulting and other services revenues. Cost of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 includes $20,000 and $2,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under ASC 718 (formerly SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payments”).
Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2009 was 52.5% compared to gross profit of 56.2% in 2008. The decrease in gross profit was mainly a result of the decrease in the license sales and maintenance and technical support, which maintain high gross profit margins.
Research and Development Expenses, Net. Gross research and development costs decreased by 10% from $4.9 million in 2008 to $4.4 million in 2009. Net research and development expenses decreased by 44% from $2.3 million in 2008 to $1.3 million in 2009. In 2009, we capitalized $3.1 million of software development costs compared to $2.6 million in 2008 due to an increase in product enhancements. The decrease in gross research and development costs in 2009 was primarily due to a reduction in salary costs that we implemented in 2009 and the depreciation of the NIS against the U.S. dollar, which decreased the U.S. dollar value of our NIS denominated salary costs. Net research and development costs as a percentage of revenues in 2009 was 2.4% compared to 3.8% in 2008. Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 include $13,000 and $26,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under ASC 718.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses decreased by 12% from $17.4 million in 2008 to $15.3 million in 2009. The decrease in selling and marketing expenses is consistent with the decrease in total sales and is also attributable to expense control initiatives implemented by management in 2009. Selling and marketing expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 include $112,000 and $32,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under ASC 718.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased by 25% from $10.9 million in 2008 to $8.2 million in 2009. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to a reduction in salary costs that we implemented in 2009 together with other expense control initiatives. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 include $99,000 and $70,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under ASC 718.
Other Income, Net. We recorded other income of $2.0 million in 2009, which is mainly attributable to the sale of our Israel-based headquarters’ office building on December 2009 in consideration of $5.2 million, of which $4.9 million was received in December, 2009 and the remaining $0.3 million is being held trust subject to receipt of certain approvals from the Israeli tax authorities and local municipality that we have no outstanding obligations. We did not record other income in 2008.
Financial Income, Net. Financial income, net decreased from $0.4 million in 2008 to $0.2 million in 2009. The decrease in financial income, net was primarily due to lower prevailing interest rates on deposits and marketable securities and the effect of changes in currency rates.
Taxes on Income. We recorded taxes on income of $0.2 million in 2008 compared to $0.3 million in 2009. Taxes on income are primarily attributable to taxes incurred in Europe and the United States. Most of our subsidiaries have accumulated carryforward losses for tax purposes.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates. Prior to the sale of our 40% ownership interest in Nextstep in June 2008, we recognized income and loss from the operations of Nextstep. In 2008, we recorded equity in losses of affiliates of $8,000. As a result of the sale of our interest in Nextstep in June 2008, we recorded a loss of $61,000. We did not record equity in losses of affiliates in 2009.
Net Income (Loss). We recorded net income of $4.5 million from continued operations in 2008 compared to net income of $6.2 million from continued operations in 2009. The increase in net income in 2009 is mainly attributable to the capital gain of approximately $2 million we recorded from the sale of our Israel-based headquarters’ office building as well as expense control initiatives implemented by management in 2009.
Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared With Year Ended December 31, 2007
Revenues. Revenues in 2008 increased by 6% from $58.4 million in 2007 to $62.0 million in 2008. License revenues increased by 19% from $15.0 million in 2007 to $17.9 million in 2008, as a result of uniPaaS and iBOLT sales to new customers. Revenues from sales of applications increased by 11% from $2.7 million in 2007 to $3.0 million in 2008, primarily due to sales of additional licenses to current customers. Revenues from maintenance and technical support increased by 15% from $12.6 million in 2007 to $14.5 million in 2008, as a result of the increased maintenance and support services that we provided to existing and new customers consistent with the increase in license sales. Revenues from consulting and other services decreased by 5% from $28.1 million in 2007 to $26.6 million in 2008, as a result of the advancement of a number of customers’ projects to production stage, consequently reducing the technology consulting needs of these customers.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues decreased by 1.0% from $27.3 million in 2007 to $27.1 million in 2008. Cost of revenues for licenses decreased by 3% from $3.3 million in 2007 to $3.2 million in 2008, due to a decrease in amortization of capitalized software development expenses from $2.5 million in 2007 to $2.4 million in 2008. Cost of revenues for applications increased by 31% from $1.3 million in 2007 to $1.7 million in 2008, consistent with the increase in application revenues. Cost of revenues for maintenance and technical support increased by 38% from $1.6 million in 2007 to $2.2 million in 2008, consistent with the increase in maintenance and technical support revenues. Cost of revenues for consulting and other services decreased by 6% from $21.2 million in 2007 to $20.0 million in 2008, consistent with the decrease in consulting and other services revenues. Cost of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 includes $35,000 and $20,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under ASC 718.
Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2008 was 56.2% compared to gross profit of 53.2% in 2007. The improvement in gross profit was mainly a result of the increase in license sales, which have a high gross profit margin, and cost savings that we implemented that improved the gross profit margin from professional services.
Research and Development Expenses, Net. Total research and development expenses decreased by 14% from $5.7 million in 2007 to $4.9 million in 2008. Net research and development expenses decreased by 15% from $2.7 million in 2007 to $2.3 million in 2008. In 2008, we capitalized $2.6 million of software development costs, compared to $3.0 million in 2007. The decrease in total research and development expenses in 2008 was due to a decrease in the number of our research and development department personnel. Net research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues in 2008 was 4% compared with 5% in 2007. Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 include $47,000 and $13,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under recorded under ASC 718.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased by 12% from $15.6 million in 2007 to $17.4 million in 2008. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is primarily attributable to the appreciation of the Japanese Yen against the U.S. dollar in 2008, which adversely affected the U.S. dollar value of our Japanese Yen denominated expenses and the reclassification of certain employees between departments, which resulted in an increase in selling and marketing personnel in 2008. Selling and marketing expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 include $132,000 and $112,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under recorded under ASC 718.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased by 5% from $11.5 million in 2007 to $10.9 million in 2008. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to the depreciation of the Euro against the U.S. dollar in 2008, which positively affected the U.S. dollar value of our Euro denominated expenses and the reclassification of certain employees between departments, which resulted in a decrease in general and administrative personnel in 2008. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 include $220,000 and $99,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation recorded under recorded under ASC 718.
Other Income, Net. We recorded other income, net of $0.2 million in 2007 relating to the sale of CarPro System Ltd.’s intellectual property, related assets and eDeveloper licenses. We did not record other income in 2008.
Financial Income, Net. Financial income, net increased from $0.2 million in 2007 to $0.4 million in 2008. The increase in financial income, net was primarily due to an increase in interest income as a result of increased cash and cash equivalents.
Taxes on Income. We recorded taxes on income of $0.4 million in 2007 compared to $0.2 million in 2008. Taxes on income are primarily attributable to taxes incurred in Europe and the United States. Most of our subsidiaries have accumulated carryforward losses for tax purposes.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates. Prior to the sale of our 40% ownership interest in Nextstep in June 2008, we recognized income and loss from the operations of Nextstep. In 2008, we recorded equity in losses of affiliates of $8,000 compared to equity in losses of affiliates of $86,000 in 2007. As a result of the sale of our interest in Nextstep in June 2008, we recorded a loss of $61,000 in 2008.
Minority Interest in Earnings (Losses) of Subsidiaries. Minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries represents the minority shareholders’ share of the earnings or losses of CarPro Systems Ltd. In 2007, we recorded a loss of $22,000 relating to the minority interest in earnings of CarPro Systems Ltd. We did not record a minority interest in the earnings (losses) of subsidiaries in 2008 as CarPro Systems was not active in 2008.
Net Income (Loss) from Continued Operations. We recorded net income of $1.1 million from continued operations in 2007 compared to net income of $4.5 million from continued operations in 2008. The increase in net income in 2008 is mainly attributable to the increase of licenses sales, maintenance and support and improved profitability.
Net Income from Discontinued Operations. In 2007, we recorded $11.5 million net income from discontinued operations relating to our former wholly-owned subsidiary, AAOD, which we sold in 2007, and to our Italian subsidiary, which ceased to be active in 2007. The net income from discontinued operations in 2007 consists of a $9.3 million capital gain resulting from the sale of AAOD and $2.9 million net income from the operations of AAOD, offset in part by a $0.7 million loss from the operations of our Italian subsidiary. We did not record net income from discontinued operations in 2008.
Impact of Currency Fluctuations and of Inflation
Our financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars, our functional currency. However, a substantial portion of our revenues and costs are incurred in other currencies, particularly NIS, Euros, Japanese yen, and the British pound. We also maintain substantial non-U.S. dollar balances of assets, including cash, accounts receivable, and liabilities, including accounts payable. Therefore, fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we do business relative to the U.S. dollar may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The depreciation of such other currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar has the effect of reducing the U.S. dollar value of any of our liabilities which are payable in those other currencies (unless such costs or payables are linked to the U.S. dollar). Such depreciation also has the effect of decreasing the U.S. dollar value of any asset that is denominated in such other currencies or receivables payable in such other currencies (unless such receivables are linked to the U.S. dollar). In addition, the U.S. dollar value of revenues and expenses denominated in such other currencies would increase. Conversely, the appreciation of any currency in relation to the U.S. dollar has the effect of increasing the U.S. dollar value of any unlinked assets and the U.S. dollar amounts of any unlinked liabilities and increasing the U.S. dollar value of revenues and expenses denominated in other currencies.
In addition, while we incur a portion of our costs in NIS, the U.S. dollar cost of our operations in Israel is influenced by the extent to which any increase in the rate of inflation in Israel is (or is not) offset, or is offset on a lagging basis, by a devaluation of the NIS in relation to the U.S. dollar.
Because exchange rates between the NIS, Euro, Japanese yen, and the British pound and the U.S. dollar fluctuate continuously, exchange rate fluctuations and especially larger periodic devaluations will have an impact on our profitability and period-to-period comparisons of our results. We cannot assure you that in the future our results of operations may not be materially adversely affected by currency fluctuations.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) devaluation or appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the most important currencies for our business, the NIS, Euro, Japanese yen, the British pound; and (ii) inflation as reflected in changes in the Israeli consumer price index.
Conditions in Israel
We are incorporated under the laws of Israel, and our principal executive offices and most of our research and development facilities are located in the State of Israel. See Item 3.D. “Key Information - Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Location in Israel” for a description of governmental, economic, fiscal, monetary or political polices or factors that have materially affected or could materially affect our operations.
Corporate Tax Rate
Israeli companies are subject to corporate tax at the rate of 26% in the 2009 tax year and 25% in the 2010 tax year. The corporate tax rate has been scheduled to further decline in a recent amendment to the Income Tax Ordinance (Amendment No. 171 dated July 23, 2009) to 24% in 2011, 23% in 2012, 22% in 2013, 21% in 2014, 20% in 2015 and 18% in 2016 and thereafter. However, the effective tax rate payable by a company that derives income from an “approved enterprise” (as further discussed below), may be considerably less.
Eight investment programs at our facility in Or Yehuda have been granted “approved enterprise” status under the Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959, commonly referred to as the Investment Law, and we are, therefore, eligible for certain tax benefits. Subject to compliance with applicable requirements, the portion of our income derived from the approved enterprise programs will be tax-exempt for a period of two to four years commencing in the first year in which an approved enterprise generates taxable income and will be subject, for a period of five to eight years, to a reduced corporate tax of 25%. However, these benefits will not be available to us with respect to any income derived by our non-Israeli subsidiaries.
On April 1, 2005, an amendment to the Investment Law, or the Amendment, came into effect that has significantly changed the provisions of the Investment Law. The Amendment limits the scope of enterprises which are eligible to receive tax benefits, such as generally requiring that at least 25% of the enterprise’s income will be derived from export. Additionally, the Amendment enacted major changes in the manner in which tax benefits are awarded under the Investment Law so that companies no longer require Investment Center approval in order to qualify for tax benefits. Under the Amendment, a company wishing to receive the tax benefits afforded under the Investment Law is required to select the tax year from which the period of benefits under the Investment Law are to commence by notifying the Israeli Tax Authority within 12 months of the end of that year.
However, the Amendment to the Investment Law provides that terms and benefits included in any certificate of approval granted prior to the Amendment will remain subject to the provisions of the Investment Law as they were on the date of such approval. Therefore, our existing approved enterprise programs will generally not be subject to the provisions of the Amendment. As a result of the Amendment, tax-exempt income will subject us to taxes upon distribution or liquidation and we may be required to record deferred tax liability with respect to such tax-exempt income. As of December 31, 2009, we did not generate income under the provision of the Amendment.
As of December 31, 2009, our net operating loss carry-forwards for Israeli tax purposes was approximately $36.6 million. Under current Israeli tax laws, operating loss carry-forwards do not expire and may be offset against future taxable income. As of December 31, 2009, our subsidiaries in Europe, the United States and Japan had estimated total available tax loss carry-forwards of $7.2 million, $8.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively, which may be offset against future taxable income for 15 to 20 years, 15 to 20 years, and one year, respectively.
We have received final tax assessments through the year 2004 from the Israeli tax authorities.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard that established the FASB ASC and amended the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, such that the ASC became the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission under authority of federal securities law are also sources of the authoritative GAAP for registrants. All other literature is considered non-authoritative. New accounting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 are communicated by the FASB through Accounting Standards Updates, or ASUs. The ASC is effective for us from September 1, 2009.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the “Fair Value Measurements Disclosures” codified in ASU 2010-06. More specifically, this update will require (a) an entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers; and (b) information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements to be presented separately (i.e. present the activity on a gross basis rather than net) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). This update clarifies existing disclosure requirements for the level of disaggregation used for classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value and requires disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. This will become effective for us as of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 roll forward information, which is required for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim reporting periods within those years. We believe that the adoption of the new guidance will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Historically, we have financed our operations through cash generated by operations, funds generated by our public offerings in 1991 (approximately $8.5 million), 1996 (approximately $5.0 million) and 2000 (approximately $79.6 million), private equity investments in 1998 (approximately $12.2 million), as well as from research and development and marketing grants primarily from the Government of Israel. In addition, we have also financed our operations through short-term loans and borrowings under available credit facilities.
On December 30, 2007, we entered into an agreement, to sell our wholly-owned subsidiary, AAOD, a Florida corporation, that develops and markets application software targeted at the long-term care industry, to Fortissimo Capital, for $17 million. We received $1.0 million of the sale proceeds in December 2007 and $16.0 million at the beginning of 2008. We recorded a capital gain of $9.3 million as a result of the transaction in 2007.
In June 2008, we sold our 40% interest in Nextstep in consideration of $150,000 and recorded a capital loss of $61,000.
In December 2009, we sold our Israel-based headquarters’ office building in consideration of $5.2 million, The office building was sold for the total consideration of $5.2 million, of which $4.9 million was received in December, 2009 and the remaining $0.3 million is being held trust subject to receipt of certain approvals from the Israeli tax authorities and local municipality that we have no outstanding obligations. We recorded a capital gain of $1.9 million as a result of the transaction in 2009.
In February 2010, we, through our vertical U.S. subsidiary, completed the acquisition of a consulting and staffing services business of a U.S-based company, for approximately $11.8 million in cash to be paid over a three year period. We believe that the acquisition will enable us to expand our presence in the U.S. market and leverage our relationships with top tier customers.
As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $41.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and working capital of approximately $28.0 million, compared to approximately $32.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and working capital of approximately $33.9 million at December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2009, our total debt was approximately $53,000, comprised solely of long-term loans (including current maturities), compared to approximately $180,000 as of December 31, 2008, comprised of $178,000 of long-term loans (including current maturities) and $2,000 of short term credit. The decrease is mainly attributable to the repayment of short-term credit in 2009.
In December 2009, we announced that our board of directors had declared a cash dividend of $0.50 per share. Actual payment of the dividend in the aggregate amount of approximately $16 million was made on January 25, 2010.
We do not currently have significant capital spending or purchase commitments; however we anticipate a moderate increase in capital expenditures and lease commitments during 2010 consistent with our anticipated level of operations, infrastructure and personnel. We believe that our accumulated cash, in conjunction with cash generated from operations and available funds, will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. We expect that cash provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors, including fluctuations in our operating results, accounts receivable collections, and the timing and amount of tax and other payments.
In light of the challenging conditions in the financial markets over the last year, we have been more proactively managing our cash equivalents and fixed income portfolio. We believe the overall credit quality of our portfolio is strong, with our cash equivalents and fixed income portfolio invested in securities with a weighted-average credit rating exceeding A. Our fixed income and publicly traded equity securities are classified as Level 1 investments, as measured under ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”), as these vendors either provide a quoted market price in an active market or use observable inputs.
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented:
Net cash provided by operating activities was $7.5 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $7.7 million and $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net cash provided by operations in 2009 consists primarily of our ongoing operations activity and of net income adjusted for non cash activity, including depreciation and amortization of our capitalized research and development assets and a decrease in trade receivables, which was offset by gain on sale of property and equipment, a decrease in accrued expenses and other accounts payable and an increase in deferred income taxes. Net cash provided by operations in 2008 consists primarily of our ongoing operations activity and of net income adjusted for non cash activity, including depreciation and amortization of our capitalized research and development assets and an increase in accrued expenses and other accounts payable. Net cash provided by operations in 2007 consists primarily of net income adjusted for non cash activity, including stock-based compensation expenses, depreciation and amortization of our capitalized research and development assets and an increase in accrued expenses and other accounts payable and a decrease in other accounts receivable and prepaid expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $10.4 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of approximately $11.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and net cash used in investing activities of approximately $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Net cash used in investing activities in 2009 is primarily attributable to investment in short-term and long-term deposits, capitalized software development costs and investment in marketable securities, which was offset by proceeds received from the sale of our Israel-based headquarters’ office building in December 2009. Net cash provided by investing activities in 2008 is primarily attributable to proceeds received from the sale of our wholly-owned AAOD subsidiary, as well as proceeds of $150,000 from the sale of Nextstep, offset by capitalized software development costs, the purchase of property and equipment and investment in marketable securities and short term bank deposits. Net cash used in investment activities in 2007 is primarily attributable to capitalized software development costs and the purchase of property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities was approximately $0.1million, $3.4 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, primarily attributable to the repayment of short-term loans.
Our research and development and support personnel work closely with our customers and prospective customers to determine their requirements and to design enhancements and new releases to meet their needs. We periodically release enhancements and upgrades to our core products. In the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, we invested $5.7 million, $4.9 million and $4.4 million in research and development, respectively. Research and development activities take place in our facilities in Israel, India and Japan.
As of December 31, 2009, we employed 97 employees in research and development activities, of which 34 persons were located in Israel, 59 persons in India and four persons in Japan. Our product development team includes technical writers who prepare user documentation for our products. In addition, we have also entered into arrangements with subcontractors for the preparation of product user documentation and certain product development work.
For additional information regarding product development see Item 4. “Information on the Company - Business Overview - Product Development”.
We intend to continue our tight cost control efforts in 2010 in order to achieve improved profitability.
For more information on trends in our industry, please see Item 4. “Information on the Company-Business Overview-Industry Background and Trends” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Results of Operations.”
We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements. In addition, we have no unconsolidated special purpose financing or partnership entities that are likely to create material contingent obligations.
The following table summarizes our minimum contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009 and the effect we expect them to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
*Severance payments relate to accrued severance obligations mainly to our Israeli employees as required under Israeli labor law. We are legally required to pay severance upon certain circumstances, primarily upon termination of employment by our company, retirement or death of the respective employee. Our liability for all of our Israeli employees is fully provided for by monthly deposits with insurance policies and by an accrual.
Set forth below are the name, age, principal position and a biographical description of each of our directors and executive officers:
(1) Member of our Option Committee
(2) Member of our Audit Committee
(3) Member of our Investment Committee
Messrs. Guy Bernstein, Eli Reifman and Yehezkel Zeira and Ms. Naamit Salomon were elected at our 2009 annual general meeting of shareholders for a one year period, to serve as directors until our 2010 annual general meeting of shareholders. Messrs. Itiel Efrat and Elan Penn will serve as our outside directors pursuant to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law for three-year terms until December 28, 2012 and December 29, 2011, respectively.
Guy Bernstein's and Asaf Berenstein's fathers are brothers. Other than such relationship, there are no family relationships among our directors and senior executives.
On January 2009, Mr. David Zigdon, our former financial executive officer, ceased to serve in such capacity. On February, 2009, .Ms. Hadas Gazit Kaiser, was appointed as our chief financial officer and she served in such position until October 19, 2009. On April 26, 2010, Mr. Guy Bernstein was appointed as our acting chief executive officer and Mr. Asaf Berenstein was appointed as our acting chief financial officer.
Guy Bernstein> has served as our acting chief executive officer since April 2010 and has served as a director of our company since January 2007. Mr. Bernstein served as the chairman of our board of directors from April 2008 to April 2010. Mr. Bernstein has served as the chief executive officer of Formula Systems, our parent company, since January 2008. Since December 2006, Mr. Bernstein has served as a director and the chief executive officer of Emblaze, our controlling shareholder. Mr. Bernstein also serves as a director of Sapiens International Corporation N.V., or Sapiens, and is the chairman of the board of directors of Matrix IT Ltd, both of which are subsidiaries of Formula Systems. From April 2004 to December 2006, Mr. Bernstein served as the chief financial officer of Emblaze and he has served as a director of Emblaze since April 2004. Prior thereto and from 1999, Mr. Bernstein served as our chief financial and operations officer. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Bernstein was at Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global, where he acted as senior manager from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Bernstein holds a B.A. degree in accounting and economics from Tel Aviv University and is a certified public accountant (CPA) in Israel.
Asaf Berenstein> has served as our acting chief financial officer since April 2010. Prior to that and from August 2008, Mr. Berenstein served as our corporate controller. Prior to joining our company and from July 2007, Mr. Berenstein served as assistant controller at Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd. From October 2003 to July 2008, Mr. Berenstein was a certified public accountant at Kesselman & Kesselman, a member of PriceWaterhouseCooper. Mr. Berenstein holds a B.A degree in accounting and economics and M.B.A. degree, both from Tel-Aviv University, and is a certified public accountant (CPA) in Israel.
Itiel Efrat> has served as an outside director of our company since December 2006 and is a member of our audit committee. Mr. Efrat is the founder and has served as co-managing director of ERB Ltd., a leading financial consulting firm, since 1995. Mr. Efrat was also the founder and is a member of the board of directors of ESOP-Excellence Trust Company since 2004. Mr. Efrat is a certified public accountant (CPA) in Israel and holds a B.A. degree in accounting and economics from Tel-Aviv College of Management.
Elan Penn> has served as an outside director of our company (within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law) since December 2005 and is a member of our audit committee. Mr. Penn was elected as an outside director for a second three-year term as of December 29, 2008 and expiring on December 29, 2011. Mr. Penn has served as chief executive officer and chairman of Penn Publishing Ltd., a private company based in Tel Aviv, Israel since 2001. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Penn served as vice president of finance and administration of A.I. Research and Development Ltd. Mr. Penn served as chief executive officer of Sivan Computer Training Company Ltd. during the years 1998 through 2000. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Penn served as vice president of finance and administration of Mashov Computers Ltd. From 1987 to 1991 and again from 1992 to 1997, Mr. Penn served as our company’s vice president of finance and administration. Mr. Penn also serves as a director of Telcoor Telekom Ltd. Mr. Penn holds a B.A. degree in economics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and a Ph.D. in management science from the University of London.
Eli Reifman >has served as a director of our company since January 2007. Mr. Reifman served as the chief executive officer of Emblaze from September 2000 until December 2006 and was an executive director of Emblaze from its inception until September 2009. Before joining Emblaze, Mr. Reifman was the head of the Technical Development Department and acting head of all production in the Training Development Center of the Israeli Defense Forces, where he was responsible for producing high-end military simulators. In parallel to his business activities, Mr. Reifman is a regular lecturer at BA and MBA courses to Israeli and international students and is involved with promoting social education agenda in Israel via his involvement in various nonprofit organizations.
Naamit Salomon >has served as director of our company since March 2003. Since January 2010, Ms. Salomon has served as a partner in an investment company. Ms. Salomon serves as a director of Sapiens, which is part of the Formula group. Ms. Salomon served as the chief financial officer of Formula Systems from August 1997 until December 2009. From 1990 through August 1997, Ms. Salomon served as the controller of two large privately held companies in the Formula group. Ms. Salomon holds a B.A. degree in economics and business administration from Ben Gurion University and an L.L.M. degree from Bar-Ilan University.
Yehezkel Zeira> has served as a director of our company since December 2005 and is a member of our audit committee. Mr. Zeira has served as an independent information technologies consultant since 2001. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Zeira served as executive vice president international of Ness Technologies Inc., and from 1970 to 2000, Mr. Zeira served in various positions at Advanced Technology Ltd., including as chief executive officer which position he assumed in 1982. Mr. Zeira also serves as a director of Tim Computer Systems Ltd. and Dafron Ltd. Mr. Zeira is also a lecturer at Ben Gurion University Faculty of Engineering. Mr. Zeira holds a B. Sc. degree in industrial engineering and an M. Sc. degree in operations research, both from the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology and has participated in the Harvard Business School program for management development. The following table lists our other key employees:
Amit Ben-Zvi> has served as our vice president and chief executive officer of our subsidiary, Hermes Logistics Technologies Limited, since October 2007. Prior to that time and from September 2005, Mr. Ben-Zvi served as the vice president marketing and manager of our iBOLT division. From July 2002 to July 2005, Mr. Ben-Zvi served as chief executive officer of WizCom Technologies, a publicly traded company specializing in scanning pens and mobile data capture products. Prior thereto and from January 2000, Mr. Ben-Zvi served as the chief executive officer of ISYS Operational Management Systems Ltd., a software applications company based in Israel. From December 1997 to January 2000, Mr. Ben-Zvi served as chief operating officer of Top Imaging Systems Ltd., a publicly traded company. Mr. Ben-Zvi holds a B.A. degree in accounting and L.L.B. degree, both from Tel-Aviv University.
Amit Birk> has served as our vice president, mergers and acquisitions, general counsel and corporate secretary since May 1999. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Birk was an associate at Avital Dromi & Co., a leading law firm in Tel Aviv, Israel. Since November 2007, Mr. Birk has served as an outside director of BGI Investment (1961) Ltd., an Israeli public company. Mr. Birk holds an L.L.B. degree from the University of Sheffield, an M.B.A. degree from Bar Ilan University and a Practical Engineer degree from ORT College. Mr. Birk is also a certified mediator.
Arita Mattsoff >has served as our vice president, global marketing since September 2007. From June 2004 to September 2007, Ms. Mattsoff served as vice president marketing at Finjan Software Ltd., and from July 2001 to June 2004 as vice president commercial marketing at Paradigm Geophysical Ltd. From 1995 to1999, Ms. Mattsoff held senior marketing positions at Scitex Corporation. Ms. Mattsoff serves as a board member of LATET, Israeli Humanitarian Organization, and during 2000 Ms. Mattsoff served as active general manager of LATET. Ms. Mattsoff holds a B.A. degree in social sciences and an M.B.A. degree, both from Tel Aviv University.
Eyal Pfeifel> has served as our chief technology officer since October 2009. From February 2007 to July 2009, Mr. Pfeifel served as the chief technology officer of Ai Research and Technology. Mr. Pfeifel previously worked with our company, as marketing general manager our Japanese branch from 1998 to 2000 and as product manager at our headquarters from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Pfeifel has also served in a range of other senior positions, including vice president for product management at Artificial Intelligence, director of product marketing for Babylon and director of business development for M-Systems.
Udi Ertel> has served as vice president of global services and distribution in Asia Pacific region, East Europe, South Africa and the Middle East since January 2009. From July 2004 until December 2008, Mr. Ertel served as the chief executive officer of Magic Israel. From June 1995 until July 2004, Mr. Ertel served as the chief executive officer of Complot (83) Ltd. Mr. Ertel holds a B.Sc. degree in mathematics and computer science from Tel Aviv University.
Regev Yativ> has served as our president and the chief executive officer Magic Software Enterprises Inc. since January 2008. Prior to that time and from October 2006, Mr. Yativ served as our vice president international sales and was responsible for our business activities and branches in Europe and Japan, as well as the Israel-based team that oversees the distribution network in the Asia Pacific region, Latin America and South Africa. From September 2002 until June 2006, Mr. Yativ served as our vice president and managing director of Europe, Middle East and Africa, based at our Netherlands office. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Yativ served as chief operating officer of Agro Marches Int. Paris, a company specializing in software and eBusiness platforms and managed its branches across Europe. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Yativ was the chief executive officer of G.E.D B.V. in Amsterdam, an investments and business development group dealing in software and eBusiness solutions throughout Europe. Mr. Yativ holds a B.A. degree in linguistics & middle east science from Tel Aviv University.
The following table sets forth all compensation we paid with respect to all of our directors and executive officers as a group for the year ended December 31, 2009.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we paid to each of our outside and independent directors an annual fee of approximately $11,000 and a per-meeting attendance fee of approximately $480. Those fees are paid based on the fees detailed in a schedule published semi-annually by the Committee for Public Directors under the Israeli Securities Law. The above compensation excludes stock- based compensation costs in accordance with ASC 718 (formerly SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payments”).
As of December 31, 2009, our directors and executive officers as a group, then consisting of 10 persons, held options to purchase an aggregate of 255,655 ordinary shares, at exercise prices ranging from $0.61 to $4.02 per share. Of such options, options to purchase 2,779 ordinary shares expire in 2012, options to purchase 154,376 ordinary shares expire in 2013, options to purchase 36,000 ordinary shares expire in 2015 and options to purchase 62,500 ordinary shares expire in 2019. All such options were granted under our 2000 Stock Option Plan and 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan. See Item 6E. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Share Ownership - Stock-Based Compensation Plans.”
According to the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association, the management of our business is vested in our board of directors. The board of directors may exercise all powers and may take all actions that are not specifically granted to our shareholders. Our executive officers are responsible for our day-to-day management. The executive officers have individual responsibilities established by our board of directors. Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the board of directors, subject to any applicable agreements.
Election of Directors
Our articles of association provide for a board of directors consisting of no less than three and no more than 11 members or such other number as may be determined from time to time at a general meeting of shareholders. Our board of directors is currently composed of six directors.
Pursuant to our articles of association, all of our directors are elected at our annual general meeting of shareholders, which are required to be held at least once during every calendar year and not more than 15 months after the last preceding meeting. Except for our outside directors (as described below), our directors are elected by a vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power represented and voting at such meeting and hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders following the annual meeting at which they were appointed. Directors (other than outside directors) may be removed earlier from office by resolution passed at a general meeting of our shareholders. Our board of directors may temporarily fill vacancies in the board until the next annual meeting of shareholders, provided that the total number of directors will not exceed the maximum number permitted under our articles of association.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, our board of directors is required to determine the minimum number of directors who must have “accounting and financial expertise” (as such term is defined in regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law). In determining such number, the board of directors must consider, among other things, the type and size of the company and the scope of and complexity of its operations. Our board of directors has determined that at least one director must have “accounting and financial expertise,” within the meaning of the regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law.
We are exempt from the requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Rules with regard to the nomination process of directors, since we are a controlled company within the meaning of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5615(c)(1). See Item 16G. “Corporate Governance.”
Outside and Independent Directors
Outside Directors. The Israeli Companies Law requires companies incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel with shares that have been offered to the public in or outside of Israel to appoint at least two outside directors. No person may be appointed as an outside director if the person or the person’s relative, partner, employer or any entity under the person’s control has or had, on or within the two years preceding the date of the person’s appointment to serve as outside director, any affiliation with the company or any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the company. The term “affiliation” includes an employment relationship, a business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis, control and service as an “office holder” as defined in the Israeli Companies Law, however, “affiliation” does not include service as a director of a private company prior to its first public offering if the director was appointed to such office for the purpose of serving as an outside director following the company’s first public offering. In addition, no person may serve as an outside director if the person’s position or other activities create or may create a conflict of interest with the person’s responsibilities as an outside director or may otherwise interfere with the person’s ability to serve as an outside director. If, at the time outside directors are to be appointed, all current members of the board of directors are of the same gender, then at least one outside director must be of the other gender.
At least one of the outside directors must have “accounting and financial expertise” and the other outside directors must have “professional expertise,” as such terms are defined by regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law.
The outside directors are elected by a majority vote at a shareholders meeting. The shareholders voting in favor of their election must include at least one-third of the shares of the non-controlling shareholders of the company who voted on the matter (not including abstentions). This minority approval requirement need not be met if the total shareholdings of those non-controlling shareholders who vote against their election represent 1% or less of all of the voting rights in the company.
In general, outside directors serve for a three-year term and may be reelected to one additional three-year term. However, Israeli companies listed on certain stock exchanges outside Israel, including The NASDAQ Global Market, may appoint an outside director for additional terms of not more than three years subject to certain conditions. Such conditions include the determination by the audit committee and board of directors, that in view of the director’s professional expertise and special contribution to the company’s board of directors and its committees, the appointment of the outside director for an additional term is in the best interest of the company.
Outside directors may be removed from office only by the same percentage of shareholders as is required for their election, or by a court, and then only if the outside directors cease to meet the statutory qualifications for their appointment, violate their duty of loyalty to the company or are found by a court to be unable to perform his or hers duties on a full time basis. Outside directors may also be removed by the court if they are found guilty of bribery, fraud, administrative offenses or use of inside information.
Each committee of the board of directors must include at least one outside director and the audit committee must be comprised of at least three directors and include all the outside directors. An outside director is entitled to compensation as provided in regulations adopted under the Israeli Companies Law and is otherwise prohibited from receiving any other compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with such service.
Until the lapse of two year from termination of office, we may not engage an outside director to service as an office holder and cannot employ or receive services from that person, either directly or indirectly, including through a corporation controlled by that person.
Independent Directors. NASDAQ Listing Rules require us to establish an audit committee comprised of at least three members and only of independent directors each of whom satisfies the respective “independence” requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ.
As a controlled company, within the meaning of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5615(c)(1), we are exempted from the NASDAQ Listing Rule which requires that a majority of our board of directors must qualify as independent directors, within the meaning of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. See Item 16G. “Corporate Governance.”
Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Itiel Efrat and Mr. Elan Penn both qualify as independent directors under the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ requirements and as outside directors under the Israeli Companies Law requirements. Our Board of Directors has further determined that Mr. Yehezkel Zeira qualifies as an independent director under the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ requirements.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Audit Committee. Our audit committee, established in accordance with Section 114 of the Israeli Companies Law and Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, assists our board of directors in overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of our company and audits of our financial statements, including the integrity of our financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our independent public accountants’ qualifications and independence, the performance of our internal audit function and independent public accountants, finding any irregularities in the business management of our company for which purpose the audit committee may consult with our independent auditors and internal auditor, proposing to the board of directors ways to correct such irregularities and such other duties as may be directed by our board of directors.
The responsibilities of the audit committee also include approving related-party transactions as required by law. Under Israeli law, an audit committee may not approve an action or a transaction with a controlling shareholder, or with an office holder, unless at the time of approval two outside directors are serving as members of the audit committee and at least one of the outside directors was present at the meeting in which an approval was granted.
Our audit committee is currently composed of Messrs. Efrat, Penn and Zeira, each of whom satisfies the respective “independence” requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ. We also comply with Israeli law requirements for audit committee members. Mr. Elan Penn has been elected as the chairperson of the audit committee. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Penn qualifies as a financial expert. The audit committee meets at least once each quarter.
Option Committee. Our board of directors has established an option committee, which administers our option plans (see Item 6E. Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Share Ownership - Stock-Based Compensation Plans”). Mr. Penn, an outside director is the current member of our option committee.
Investment Committee. Our board of directors has established an investment committee, which administers our investments. Mr. Penn, an outside director, and Ms. Dafna Cohen, a board member of our parent company Formula Systems, are the current members of our investment committee. Our investment committee meets approximately once each quarter
The Israeli Companies Law also requires the board of directors of a public company to appoint an internal auditor proposed by the audit committee. A person who does not satisfy the Israeli Companies Law's independence requirements may not be appointed as an internal auditor. The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other things, the compliance of the company's conduct with applicable law and orderly business practice. Our internal auditor complies with the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law. Mr. Eyal Weizman currently serves as our internal auditor.
Directors’ Service Contracts