|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia 10-Q 2011 Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 OR
For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-15395
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) (212) 827-8000
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
Table of ContentsMartha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. September 30, 2011 Index to Form 10-Q
Table of ContentsITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of ContentsMARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of ContentsMARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC. Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited, in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of ContentsMARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited, in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of ContentsMartha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2011 (unaudited) 1. General Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is herein referred to as we, us, our, or the Company. The information included in the foregoing interim consolidated financial statements is unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods presented, have been reflected therein. The results of operations for interim periods do not necessarily indicate the results to be expected for the entire year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) with respect to the Companys fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Form 10-K) which may be accessed through the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management does not expect such differences to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements. 2. Significant Accounting Policies Equity Compensation The Company has issued stock-based compensation to certain of its employees and a non-employee consultant. In accordance with the fair-value recognition provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Share-Based Payments (ASC Topic 718) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, compensation cost recognized in the periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718. Time-based employee stock option, restricted stock, and restricted stock unit awards are amortized as non-cash equity compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the expected vesting period. The Company values time-based option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires numerous assumptions, including expected volatility of the Companys stock price and expected life of the option. Time-based restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards are valued at the market value of traded shares on the date of grant. Price-based options and price-based restricted stock unit awards are valued using the Monte Carlo Simulation method which takes into account assumptions such as volatility of the Companys Class A Common Stock, the risk-free interest rate based on the contractual term of the award, the expected dividend yield, the vesting schedule, and the probability that the market conditions of the award will be achieved. The Company applies variable accounting to its non-employee price-based restricted stock unit awards. The Companys other significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in the 2010 Form 10-K. 3. Fair Value Measurements The Company categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
7
Table of Contents
The following tables present the Companys assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
The Company has no liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis The Companys non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment, as well as cost method investments, are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and are recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized. Such impairment charges incorporate fair value measurements based on level 3 inputs.
8
Table of Contents4. Inventory Inventory is comprised of paper stock. The inventory balances at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were approximately $8.5 million and $5.3 million, respectively. 5. Investments in Other Non-Current Assets The Company has investments in preferred stock which it carries at cost. As of September 30, 2011, the Companys aggregate carrying value of these investments was $5.7 million and was included within other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company has determined that certain of these investments represent interests in variable interest entities. As of September 30, 2011, the Companys investments in the entities were substantially equal to its maximum exposure to loss. There are no future contractual funding commitments. The Company has determined that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of these entities since the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities economic performance. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate these entities and accounts for these investments under the cost method. 6. Credit Facilities The Company has a line of credit with Bank of America in the amount of $5.0 million, which is generally used to secure letters of credit. The Company was compliant with the debt covenants as of September 30, 2011. The Company had no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of September 30, 2011 and had letters of credit outstanding of $2.6 million. In April 2008, the Company entered into a loan agreement (subsequently amended and restated on August 7, 2009) with Bank of America for a term loan in the amount of $30.0 million related to the acquisition of certain assets of Emeril Lagasse. The loan is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Emeril business that the Company acquired. The loan agreement requires equal quarterly principal payments of $1.5 million and accrued interest to be paid for the duration of the loan term, approximately 5 years. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had paid $24 million in principal, including prepayment of $3.0 million due through March 31, 2012, such that $6.0 million was outstanding at September 30, 2011. Two principal payments of $1.5 million each are due as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012, which are reflected as a current liability in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011. The interest rate on all outstanding amounts is equal to a floating rate of 1-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.85%. The loan terms have required the Company to be in compliance with certain financial and other covenants, failure with which to comply would result in an event of default and would permit Bank of America to accelerate and demand repayment of the loan in full. On June 29, 2011, the Company and Bank of America executed an amendment to the loan agreement, which eliminated the financial covenants that had previously required the Company to maintain a Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio equal to or less than 2.0 and a Parent Guarantor Basic Fixed Charge Ratio equal to or greater than 2.75. The amendment also reduced the minimum level of consolidated Tangible Net Worth required to be maintained by the Company from $40 million to $30 million. Additionally, the amendment added a requirement that the Company maintain at all times cash and certain cash equivalents with an aggregate market value of not less than an amount equal to 200% of the outstanding loan principal. This cash and cash equivalents balance cannot be subject to any lien, security interest or other encumbrance, nor can it be held by the Company in order to comply with any other liquidity or other similar covenant under any agreement in respect of indebtedness or other obligations of the Company. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was compliant with all debt covenants and expects to be compliant with all debt covenants through 2011. A current summary of the most significant financial covenants is as follows:
9
Table of ContentsWhile the maintenance of a minimum level of cash balances has now become a financial covenant, the fact that the Company had cash balances that were well in excess of the loan principal at September 30, 2011 currently gives the Company the ability to repay the outstanding principal in full in the event of default or to prevent default. 7. Income taxes The Company follows ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740). Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred assets and liabilities are recognized for the future costs and benefits attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The Company periodically reviews the requirements for a valuation allowance and makes adjustments to such allowances when changes in circumstances result in changes in the Companys judgment about the future realization of deferred tax assets. ASC 740 places more emphasis on historical information, such as the Companys cumulative operating results and its current year results than it places on estimates of future taxable income. Therefore, the Company has added $8.0 million to its valuation allowance in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, resulting in a cumulative balance of $84.9 million as of September 30, 2011. In addition, the Company has recorded $1.1 million of tax expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 which is primarily attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of past acquisitions of certain indefinite-lived intangible assets and their respective tax bases, which resulted in a net deferred tax liability of $5.5 million at September 30, 2011. The Company intends to maintain a valuation allowance until evidence would support the conclusion that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset could be realized. ASC 740 further establishes guidance on the accounting for uncertain tax positions. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had an ASC 740 liability balance of $0.08 million, of which $0.06 million represented unrecognized tax benefits, which if recognized at some point in the future would favorably impact the effective tax rate, and $0.02 million represented interest. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2005 and state examinations for the years before 2003. The Company anticipates that as a result of audit settlements and statute closures over the next twelve months, the liability will be reduced through cash payments of approximately $0.01 million. 8. Equity compensation Stock option awards On June 6, August 22, and September 6, 2011 the Company made awards under the Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Omnibus Stock and Compensation Plan to several new members of its executive management team, as provided for in their employment agreements. Certain awards include service period vesting triggers and consist of options to purchase 475,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at various exercise prices (the closing price on the date of grant), which options vest as to 158,333 shares on each of the second, third, and fourth anniversaries of their employment start dates. Non-cash equity compensation expense of approximately $0.05 million was recorded during the three month period ended September 30, 2011 related to these awards. The Company measured the fair value of these awards as of the date of issuance using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which value is recognized over the remaining service period of the awards. As of September 30, 2011, there was $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these nonvested stock option awards to be recognized over a period of 3.7 to 3.9 years. The following table summarizes the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:
The Company also made awards to these employees which include price-based vesting triggers. The price-based option awards consist of options to purchase an aggregate 700,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, whereby options for 175,000 shares with an exercise price of $6 per share will vest only at such time as the trailing average closing price of the Class A Common Stock during any 30 consecutive trading days during the term of the
10
Table of Contentsemployment agreement has been at least $6, options for 175,000 shares with an exercise price of $8 per share will vest only at such time as such trailing average has been at least $8, options for 175,000 shares with an exercise price of $10 per share will vest only at such time as such trailing average has been at least $10, and options for 175,000 shares with an exercise price of $12 per share will vest only at such time as such trailing average has been at least $12. Non-cash equity compensation expense of approximately $0.3 million was recorded during the three month period ended September 30, 2011 related to these price-based awards. The Company measured the fair value of these price-based awards as of the date of issuance using the Monte Carlo Simulation method and recognizes its fair value over the service period of the awards. As of September 30, 2011, there was $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these nonvested price-based option awards to be recognized over the expected service period listed below. The following table summarizes the assumptions used in the Monte Carlo Simulation method:
In addition to non-cash equity compensation expense recorded in connection with the new executive management option awards discussed above, non-cash equity compensation expense of approximately $0.6 million was recorded during the three month period ended September 30, 2011 related to the accelerated vesting of certain option awards previously granted to former members of executive management. Restricted stock unit awards and restricted stock The new members of the Companys executive management team also received certain awards of 300,000 restricted stock units (RSUs), each of which represents the right to one share of Class A Common Stock, with service period vesting triggers, of which approximately 100,000 RSUs vest on each of the second, third, and fourth anniversaries of their employment start dates. Non-cash equity compensation expense of approximately $0.1 million was recorded during the three month period ended September 30, 2011 related to these awards. The Company has measured the fair value of these service period based awards as of the grant date and will recognize this fair value over the remaining service periods of the awards. As of September 30, 2011, there was $1.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these nonvested RSUs to be recognized over a period of 3.7 to 3.9 years. The Company also made RSU awards to these employees which include price-based vesting triggers. The price-based RSUs consist of the right to receive an aggregate 380,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, of which 50,000 RSUs will vest at such time as such trailing average common stock price has been at least $6, an additional 95,000 RSUs will vest at such time as such trailing average has been at least $8, an additional 95,000 RSUs will vest at such time as such trailing average has been at least $10, an additional 95,000 RSUs will vest at such time as such trailing average has been at least $12, and the final 45,000 RSUs will vest at such time as the trailing average has been at least $14. Non-cash equity compensation expense of approximately $0.3 million was recorded during the three month period ended September 30, 2011 related to these awards. The Company measured the fair value of these price-based awards as of the date of issuance using the Monte Carlo Simulation method and recognizes this fair value over the service period of the awards. As of September 30, 2011, there was $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these nonvested price-based restricted stock unit awards to be recognized over the expected service period listed below. The following table summarizes the assumptions used in the Monte Carlo Simulation method:
In addition to non-cash equity compensation expense recorded in connection with the new executive management RSUs discussed above, a reversal of approximately $0.9 million in non-cash equity compensation expense was recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 related to the forfeiture of certain priced-based restricted stock awards previously granted to a former member of executive management.
11
Table of Contents9. Comprehensive Loss Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Companys comprehensive loss includes net loss and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities. Total comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $19.8 million and $13.0 million, respectively. 10. Other Production, distribution and editorial expenses; selling and promotion expenses; and general and administrative expenses are all presented exclusive of depreciation and amortization, which is shown separately within Operating Costs and Expenses. Certain prior year financial information has been reclassified to conform with fiscal 2011 financial statement presentation. Prior years results of the former Internet segment have been combined with those of the Publishing segment in connection with the Companys revised identification of operating segments. 11. Industry Segments The Company is an integrated media and merchandising company providing consumers with inspiring lifestyle content and programming, and well-designed, high-quality products. The Companys business segments are Publishing, Broadcasting and Merchandising. In 2010, the Company announced its plan to report the results of operations from its former Publishing and Internet operating segments under the operating segment titled Publishing. The Company has been continuing to execute its strategy to leverage its core content across its print and digital platforms more efficiently by further centralizing the creative process. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company reorganized its advertising sales force to centralize selling efforts across all media. As a result of these fundamental changes in the way it views its business, the Company evaluated its operating segments and determined that the print and digital platforms no longer met the definition of separate operating segments in accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting. The new Publishing segment provides management with a more meaningful assessment of the operating performance of the Companys print and digital platforms. The Publishing segment primarily consists of the Companys operations related to its magazines and books, as well as its digital operations which includes the content-driven website, www.marthastewart.com. The Broadcasting segment primarily consists of the Companys television production operations and its satellite radio operations. The Martha Stewart Show season 5 aired in syndication over a 12-month period beginning in the middle of September 2009 and ending in the middle of September 2010. Season 6 of The Martha Stewart Show aired on Hallmark Channel also over a 12-month period beginning and ending in the middle of September with season 7 of The Martha Stewart Show currently airing on Hallmark Channel beginning September 26, 2011. The Merchandising segment consists of the Companys operations related to the design of merchandise and related promotional and packaging materials that are licensed to and distributed by its retail and manufacturing partners. The accounting policies for the Companys business segments are discussed in more detail in the 2010 Form 10-K. Segment information for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
12
Table of ContentsSegment information for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
12. Restructuring Charges The Company incurred approximately $3.8 million in restructuring charges during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. Restructuring charges included employee severance and other employee-related termination costs, as well as certain consulting and recruiting costs. Included in the $3.8 million restructuring charge is an approximate $0.4 million reversal of non-cash equity compensation expense related to certain employee departures.
13
Table of ContentsITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. Forward-looking Statements and Risk Factors Unless otherwise noted, we, us, our or the Company refers to Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Except for historical information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this Quarterly Report), the statements in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent only our current beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of our control. These statements often can be identified by terminology such as may, will, should, could, expects, intends, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, potential or continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected in these statements, and factors that could cause such differences include the following among others:
These and other factors are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Form 10-K) under the heading Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors. We caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
14
Table of ContentsEXECUTIVE SUMMARY We are an integrated media and merchandising company providing consumers with inspiring lifestyle content and programming, and high-quality, licensed products that we design. We are organized into three business segments with Publishing and Broadcasting representing our media platforms that are complemented by our Merchandising segment. Summarized below are our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
We generate revenue from various sources such as advertisers, licensing partners and magazine consumers. Publishing is our largest business segment, accounting for 64% of our total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The primary source of Publishing segment revenue is advertising from our magazines, which include Martha Stewart Living, Martha Stewart Weddings, Everyday Food and Whole Living. Magazine subscriptions, advertising revenue generated from our digital properties and newsstand sales, along with royalties from our book business, account for most of the balance of Publishing segment revenue. Broadcasting segment revenue is derived primarily from our television advertising and license fees, as well as satellite radio advertising and license fees. Television programming is comprised of The Martha Stewart Show, a daily home and lifestyle show, Martha Bakes and other holiday and interview specials featuring Martha Stewart. In addition, we produce television programming featuring other talent, including programs featuring Chef Emeril Lagasse, Mad Hungry with Lucinda Scala Quinn and Petkeeping with Marc Morrone. The satellite radio programming that we produce airs as the Martha Stewart Living Radio channel on Sirius XM Radio. Merchandising segment revenues are generated from the licensing of our trademarks and designs for a variety of products sold at multiple price points through a wide range of distribution channels. Our retail partnerships include our Martha Stewart Living program at The Home Depot and our Martha Stewart Collection at Macys. We have manufacturing partnerships with Wilton Properties Inc. for our Martha Stewart Crafts program and Age Group for our Martha Stewart Pets line, as well as a variety of manufacturing partnerships to produce products under the Emeril Lagasse brand. We incur expenses primarily consisting of compensation and related charges across all segments. In addition, we incur expenses related to the physical costs associated with producing magazines (including related direct mail and other marketing expenses), the editorial costs associated with creating content across our media platforms, the technology costs associated with our digital properties and the costs associated with producing our television programming. We also incur general overhead costs, including facilities and related expenses. Through September 30, 2011, we incurred restructuring charges, which consisted of employee severance and other employee-related termination costs, as well as certain consulting and recruiting costs. We expect to incur additional restructuring charges as we continue to execute on our strategic plan.
15
Table of ContentsDetailed segment operating results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below.
16
Table of ContentsThree months ended September 30, 2011 Operating Results Compared to Three Months ended September 30, 2010 Operating Results For the three months ended September 30, 2011, total revenues increased 5% from the prior-year period due to an increase in Merchandising segment revenues from higher sales, higher television revenue from license fees related to our new programming on Hallmark Channel and higher digital advertising revenue. These items were partially offset by lower television and print advertising revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, our operating costs and expenses before Corporate expenses increased 1% from the prior-year period due to higher paper, printing and distribution expenses, higher content creation costs and higher subscriber acquisition costs in our Publishing segment. In our Merchandising segment, production, distribution and editorial expenses increased to support our new merchandising relationships. Largely offsetting these increases were lower Broadcasting segment operating costs and expenses due to lower television production and distribution costs related to season 6 of The Martha Stewart Show. In addition, selling and promotion expenses decreased due to lower staff costs from the reorganization of our advertising sales department in the fourth quarter of 2010 in both the Publishing and Broadcasting segments. The Publishing and Broadcasting segments operating costs and expenses included restructuring charges, which mainly consisted of certain consulting costs and employee severance. Corporate expenses increased 41% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the prior-year period primarily due to restructuring charges. These Corporate restructuring charges, which consisted of employee severance and other employee-related termination costs, as well as certain consulting and recruiting costs, were partially offset by the reallocation of facilities-related expenses primarily to the Publishing segment, as described further in the segment discussion below. Nine months ended September 30, 2011 Operating Results Compared to Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 Operating Results For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, total revenues increased 1%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 due to an increase in Merchandising segment revenues from new relationships and increased sales, higher television revenue from license fees related to our new programming on Hallmark Channel, higher digital advertising revenue and higher magazine subscription revenue. Largely offsetting these items were the inclusion of certain one-time items in the prior-year period, including substantially all of the exclusive license fee of approximately $5.0 million from Hallmark Channel for a significant portion of our library of programming, as well as royalties related to our Kmart and 1-800-Flowers.com agreements, which ended January 2010 and June 2010, respectively, and the $2.2 million termination payment that we received from 1-800-Flowers.com. The prior-year period also included a $1.0 million one-time payment received from a manufacturing partner. In addition, television and print advertising revenue were lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 than in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our operating costs and expenses before Corporate expenses increased 4% from the prior-year period predominantly due to higher paper, printing and distribution expenses, higher content creation costs and higher subscriber acquisition costs in our Publishing segment. These increases in costs were partially offset by lower television production and distribution costs related to season 6 of The Martha Stewart Show in our Broadcasting segment, as well as lower advertising staff costs from the reorganization of our advertising sales department in the fourth quarter of 2010 in both the Publishing and Broadcasting segments. The Publishing and Broadcasting segments operating costs and expenses included restructuring charges, which mainly consisted of certain consulting costs and employee severance. Corporate expenses increased 10% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the prior-year period primarily due to restructuring charges. These Corporate restructuring charges, which consisted of employee severance and other employee-related termination costs, as well as certain consulting and recruiting costs, were partially offset by the reallocation of facilities-related expenses primarily to the Publishing segment, as described further in the segment discussion below.
17
Table of ContentsLiquidity During the first nine months of 2011, our overall cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased $7.8 million from December 31, 2010 due to principal pre-payments on our term loan, cash used for operations and capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $25.5 million and $33.3 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
18
Table of ContentsComparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 to Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Publishing segment revenues decreased 3% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. Print advertising revenue decreased $1.6 million due primarily to a decrease in advertising pages in Martha Stewart Living, partially offset by higher rates. Advertising pages and rates declined in Everyday Food, Whole Living and Martha Stewart Weddings, as well. Digital advertising revenue increased $0.7 million due to an increase in sold advertising volume, partially offset by lower advertising rates. Circulation revenue decreased $0.3 million due primarily to lower newsstand sales of Martha Stewart Living. Newsstand sales also decreased for all other titles. The declines were partially offset by the sales of the special issue of Everyday Food with no comparable special interest publication in the prior-year period.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased $0.7 million due to higher paper, distribution and printing prices and the costs associated with the additional special issue of Everyday Food. Production, distribution and editorial expenses also increased due to higher editorial compensation costs to support the print and digital magazines, books, websites and other digital initiatives, partially offset by savings from lower volume of magazine pages produced, lower professional fees related to the websites and the timing of story costs. Selling and promotion expenses increased $0.1 million due to an increase in certain subscriber acquisition costs and the timing of newsstand marketing costs. These increases were largely offset by lower staff costs primarily from the reorganization of our advertising sales department in the fourth quarter of 2010, as well as lower commission expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million largely due to higher facilities-related expenses from the reallocation of rent charges to reflect current utilization of office space, as well as higher compensation expense. The increase in our Publishing segment rent allocation was offset by a decrease in Corporate rent. Restructuring charges included certain consulting costs.
19
Table of Contents
Broadcasting segment revenues increased 14% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. Advertising revenue decreased $1.9 million primarily due to the decline in household ratings, as well as lower rates, for season 6 of The Martha Stewart Show on Hallmark Channel as compared to season 5 of The Martha Stewart Show in syndication. Advertising revenue also declined due to fewer sales of television integrations at lower rates and decreased radio advertising. Television licensing and other revenue increased $2.7 million primarily due to the delivery of new television programming to Hallmark Channel as part of the companion programming to The Martha Stewart Show, which included Emerils Table, Martha Bakes and Mad Hungry with Lucinda Scala Quinn, partially offset by the prior-year period talent fees for certain television programming featuring Emeril Lagasse. Production, distribution and editorial expenses decreased $0.9 million due to lower television production costs related to season 6 of The Martha Stewart Show on Hallmark Channel and the absence of distribution fees, which were payable under the season 5 syndication agreement for The Martha Stewart Show. The cost savings from The Martha Stewart Show season 6 were partially offset by television production costs associated with the delivery of new programming to Hallmark Channel, including an allocation of certain rent and related charges from general and administrative expenses. Selling and promotion expenses decreased $0.5 million primarily due to lower staff costs from the reorganization of our advertising sales department in the fourth quarter of 2010. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.3 million due to the allocation to production, distribution and editorial costs within the Broadcasting segment of certain rent and related charges associated with the new programming on Hallmark Channel, partially offset by higher compensation expense. Restructuring charges included employee severance as well as certain other non-recurring costs.
20
Table of Contents
Merchandising segment revenues increased 29% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. Royalty and other revenues increased $2.8 million primarily due to higher sales from certain of our existing partners. Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased $0.4 million primarily due to higher compensation expenses associated with an increase in headcount of creative staff to support our new merchandising relationships. Selling and promotion expenses increased $0.7 million mostly as a result of services that we provided to our partners for reimbursable creative services projects.
21
Table of Contents
Corporate operating costs and expenses increased 41% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses increased $0.3 million due to an increase in compensation expense as a result of overlaps in our executive management team during transition periods. These increases were partially offset by the classification of certain costs now characterized as restructuring charges, as well as the reallocation of rent charges to our Publishing segment to reflect current utilization of office space. Restructuring charges included employee severance and related professional fees, as well as certain consulting and recruiting costs. Also included in the $3.1 million restructuring charge is an approximate $0.4 million reversal of non-cash equity compensation expense related to certain employee departures. OTHER ITEMS Loss on sale of fixed asset. The three months ended September 30, 2010 included a loss of $0.6 million on the sale of a fixed asset with no comparable loss for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Gain on sale of short-term investments. The three months ended September 30, 2010 included a gain of $0.4 million on the sale of short-term investments from the disposition of certain marketable equity securities with no comparable gain in the three months ended September 30, 2011. Loss on equity securities. Loss on equity securities was $0.2 million and $0.01 million for the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The prior-year period expense was the result of marking a warrant then held by us to fair value in accordance with accounting principles governing these financial instruments. That warrant was canceled during the three months ended September 30, 2011 resulting in a loss of $0.2 million in the current-year period. On September 30, 2011, we had no other similar assets that required a valuation in accordance with accounting principles governing derivative financial instruments. Net loss. Net loss was $9.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to net loss of $8.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as a result of the factors described above.
22
Table of ContentsComparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Publishing revenues increased 1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Print advertising revenue decreased $3.1 million due primarily to a decrease in advertising pages in Martha Stewart Living, partially offset by higher rates. Advertising pages declined in Everyday Food and Whole Living, as well, partially offset by an increase in rates at Whole Living. Martha Stewart Weddings advertising revenue increased due to more pages sold partially offset by lower rates. Digital advertising revenue increased $2.6 million due to an increase in sold advertising volume, partially offset by lower rates. Circulation revenue increased $1.0 million due to higher volume of subscription copies served of Martha Stewart Living at higher revenues per copy. Newsstand sales decreased for Martha Stewart Living, Everyday Food and Whole Living, partially offset by the sales of the special issue of Everyday Food with no comparable special interest publication in the prior-year period, as well as higher newsstand sales of Martha Stewart Weddings.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased $5.3 million due to higher paper, printing and distribution prices and the costs associated with the additional special issue of Everyday Food. Production, distribution and editorial expenses also increased due to higher art and editorial compensation and story costs to support the print and digital magazines, books, websites and other digital initiatives, partially offset by savings from lower volume of magazine pages produced. Selling and promotion expenses increased slightly due to higher subscriber acquisition costs, the timing of newsstand marketing costs and higher digital marketing and advertising operations costs supporting the increase in digital advertising revenues. These increases were largely offset by lower staff costs primarily from the prior year reorganization of our advertising sales department and lower print advertising marketing expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $1.4 million largely due to a larger allocation of facilities-related expenses to reflect the current utilization of office space, as well as higher compensation expense. The increase in our Publishing segment rent allocation was offset by a decrease in Corporate
23
Table of Contentsrent. The costs associated with the Companys 2007 launch of a redesigned website, which were fully depreciated during the second quarter of 2010, resulted in a reduction in depreciation and amortization expenses by $0.4 million during this nine-month period compared to the prior-year period. Restructuring charges include certain consulting costs.
Broadcasting segment revenues decreased 15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Advertising revenue decreased $5.0 million primarily due to the decline in household ratings, as well as lower rates, for season 6 of The Martha Stewart Show on Hallmark Channel as compared to season 5 of The Martha Stewart Show in syndication. Advertising revenue also declined due to fewer sales of television integrations at lower rates and decreased radio advertising. Television licensing and other revenue increased $1.1 million primarily due to the delivery of new television programming to Hallmark Channel as part of the companion programming to The Martha Stewart Show, which included Emerils Table, Martha Bakes, Mad Hungry with Lucinda Scala Quinn, and holiday and other specials. The increase in these television licensing revenues was partially offset by the inclusion in the first quarter of 2010 of substantially all of the exclusive license fee of approximately $5.0 million from Hallmark Channel for a significant portion of our library of programming, as well as the prior-year period talent fees for certain television programming featuring Emeril Lagasse. Production, distribution and editorial expenses decreased $1.5 million due to lower television production costs related to season 6 of The Martha Stewart Show on Hallmark Channel and the absence of distribution fees, which were payable under the season 5 syndication agreement for The Martha Stewart Show. The cost savings from The Martha Stewart Show season 6 were partially offset by higher television production costs associated with the delivery of new programming to Hallmark Channel. Selling and promotion expenses decreased $1.2 million primarily due to lower staff costs from the prior year reorganization of our advertising sales department. General and administrative expenses increased $0.2 million primarily due to higher compensation expense, partially offset by the allocation to production, distribution and editorial costs within the Broadcasting segment of certain rent and related charges associated with the new programming on Hallmark Channel. Restructuring charges included employee severance as well as certain other non-recurring costs.
24
Table of Contents
Merchandising segment revenues increased 14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Royalty and other revenues increased $4.3 million primarily due to the contributions from our new merchandising relationships and increased sales from certain of our existing partners, partially offset by the inclusion in the prior-year period of royalties and a one-time $2.2 million termination payment from 1-800-Flowers.com, an agreement that ended in June 2010. In addition, the prior-year period included royalties from the terminated Kmart license and a one-time $1.0 million payment received from a manufacturing partner. Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased $1.5 million primarily due to higher compensation expenses associated with an increase in headcount to support our new merchandising relationships. Selling and promotion expenses increased $0.7 million mostly as a result of services that we provided to our partners for reimbursable creative services projects. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million largely due to the benefit in non-cash equity compensation expense from a large forfeiture of equity awards in connection with certain executive departures in the Merchandising segment.
25
Table of Contents
Corporate operating costs and expenses increased 10% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.4 million due to the reallocation of rent charges to our Publishing segment to reflect current utilization of office space, as well as lower rent expense from the consolidation of certain offices. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in compensation expense as a result of overlaps in our executive management team during transition periods. Restructuring charges included employee severance and other employee-related termination costs, as well as certain consulting and recruiting costs. Also included in the $3.1 million restructuring charge is an approximate $0.4 million reversal of non-cash equity compensation expense related to certain employee departures. OTHER ITEMS Loss on sale of fixed asset. The nine months ended September 30, 2010 included a loss of $0.6 million on the sale of a fixed asset with no comparable loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Gain on sale of short-term investments. The nine months ended September 30, 2010 included a gain of $0.4 million on the sale of short-term investments from the disposition of certain marketable equity securities with no comparable gain in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Income / (Loss) on equity securities. Income on equity securities was $0.02 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to a loss on equity securities of $0.02 million for the prior-year period. Income/(loss) on equity securities was the result of marking a warrant then held by us to fair value in accordance with accounting principles governing these financial instruments. That warrant was canceled resulting in a loss during the three months ended September 30, 2011, partially offset by the gains previously recorded in 2011. On September 30, 2011, we had no other similar assets that required a valuation in accordance with accounting principles governing derivative financial instruments. Net Loss. Net loss was $19.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to net loss of $13.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as a result of the factors described above.
26
Table of ContentsLiquidity and Capital Resources Overview During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our overall cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased $7.8 million from December 31, 2010. The decrease was due to principal pre-payments on our term loan with Bank of America, cash used for operations and capital expenditures during the period. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $25.5 million and $33.3 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. We believe that our available cash balances and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures, as well as loan payments and maintenance of applicable debt covenants for at least the next twelve months. Cash Flows from Operating Activities Our cash inflows from operating activities are generated by our business segments from revenues, as described previously in the business segment discussions, which include cash from advertisers, licensing partners and magazine consumers. Operating cash outflows generally include employee and related costs, the physical costs associated with producing magazines, the editorial costs associated with creating content across our media platforms, the technology costs associated with our digital properties, the production costs incurred for our television programming and the cash costs of facilities. Cash used in operating activities was $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared with cash provided by operating activities of $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash from operations decreased due to an increase in our operating loss, as discussed earlier, as well as the timing of cash receipts from magazine subscription orders and cash used to pay certain accounts payable and accrued liabilities. These decreases in cash from operations were partially offset by the collection of advertising and television license fee receivables and the receipt of an upfront advance payment related to our new multi-book agreement with Clarkson Potter/Publishers for Martha Stewart books. Cash Flows from Investing Activities Our cash inflows from investing activities generally include proceeds from the sale of short-term investments. Investing cash outflows generally include payments for short- and long-term investments and additions to property, plant, and equipment. Cash used in investing activities was $3.1 million and $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the first nine months of 2011, cash flow used in investing activities was primarily for capital improvements to our information technology infrastructure, as well as certain costs associated with our websites. Cash Flows from Financing Activities Our cash inflows from financing activities generally include proceeds from the exercise of stock options for our Class A Common Stock issued under our equity incentive plans. Cash outflows from financing activities generally include principal repayments on outstanding debt. Cash flows used in financing activities were $2.4 million and $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the first nine months of 2011, we made $3.0 million in principal pre-payments on our term loan with Bank of America. Debt We have a line of credit with Bank of America in the amount of $5.0 million, which is generally used to secure letters of credit. The line was renewed as of June 30, 2011 for a one-year period. We were compliant with the debt covenants as of September 30, 2011. We had no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of September 30, 2011 and had letters of credit outstanding of $2.6 million.
27
Table of ContentsIn April 2008, we entered into a loan agreement (subsequently amended and restated on August 7, 2009) with Bank of America for a term loan in the amount of $30.0 million related to the acquisition of certain assets of Emeril Lagasse (Emeril). The loan is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Emeril business that we acquired. The loan agreement requires equal principal payments of $1.5 million and accrued interest to be paid quarterly for the duration of the loan term, approximately 5 years. As of September 30, 2011, we had paid $24.0 million in principal, including prepayment of the $3.0 million due through March 31, 2012, such that $6.0 million was outstanding at September 30, 2011. Two principal payments of $1.5 million each are due on June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012 and are reflected as a current liability in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011. The interest rate on all outstanding amounts is equal to a floating rate of 1-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.85%. The loan terms have required us to be in compliance with certain financial and other covenants, failure with which to comply would result in an event of default and would permit Bank of America to accelerate and demand repayment of the loan in full. The loan agreement has been amended several times, most recently in June 2011, at which time the financial covenants that had previously required us to maintain a Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio equal to or less than 2.0 and a Parent Guarantor Basic Fixed Charge Ratio equal to or greater than 2.75 were eliminated. The amendment also reduced the minimum level of consolidated Tangible Net Worth required to be maintained by us from $40 million to $30 million. Additionally, the amendment added a requirement that we maintain at all times cash and certain cash equivalents with an aggregate market value of not less than an amount equal to 200% of the outstanding loan principal. This cash and cash equivalents balance cannot be subject to any lien, security interest or other encumbrance, nor can it be held by us in order to comply with any other liquidity or other similar covenant under any agreement in respect of indebtedness or other obligations of us. As of September 30, 2011, we were compliant with all debt covenants. A current summary of the most significant financial covenants is as follows:
We expect to be compliant with all debt covenants through 2012. While the maintenance of a minimum level of cash balances has now become a financial covenant, the fact that we had cash balances that were well in excess of the loan principal at September 30, 2011 currently gives us the ability to repay the outstanding principal in full in the event of default or to prevent default. Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations Our businesses can experience fluctuations in quarterly performance. Our Publishing segment results can vary from quarter to quarter due to publication schedules and seasonality of certain types of advertising. In addition, advertising revenue on marthastewart.com and our other websites is tied to traffic among other key factors and is typically highest in the fourth quarter of the year. Advertising revenue from our Broadcasting segment is highly dependent on ratings which fluctuate throughout the television season following general viewer trends. Ratings tend to be highest during the fourth quarter and lowest in the summer months. Certain revenues and costs in our television business also fluctuate based on production and delivery schedules. Revenues from our Merchandising segment can vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to new product launches and the seasonality and performance of certain product lines. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements At September 30, 2011, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K that have had or are likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial statements. As described in the 2010 Form 10-K, we could have indemnification obligations with respect to our officers and directors.
28
Table of ContentsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates General Except for the policy described below, our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2010 Form 10-K. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if it required assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made and changes in the estimate or different estimates could have a material effect on our results of operations. These critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns, television production costs, valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, income taxes, and non-cash equity compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience, current developments and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under these circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that cannot readily be determined from other sources. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. Non-Cash Equity Compensation We currently have a stock incentive plan that permits us to grant various types of share-based incentives to key employees, directors and consultants. The primary types of incentives that have been granted under the plan are restricted shares of common stock, restricted stock unit awards and stock options. Restricted shares are valued at the market value of traded shares on the date of grant. Other than performance-based shares tied to the market price of our Class A common stock, performance-based awards are accrued as compensation expense based on the probable outcome of the performance condition, consistent with requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. Time-based option awards are valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires numerous assumptions, including expected volatility of our stock price and expected life of the option. Price-based options and price-based restricted stock unit awards are valued using the Monte Carlo Simulation method which takes into account assumptions such as volatility of our Class A Common Stock, the risk-free interest rate based on the contractual term of the award, expected dividend yield, vesting schedule, and the probability that the market conditions of the award will be achieved. Our other critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in detail in the 2010 Form 10-K, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, especially under the heading, Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. We are exposed to certain market risks as the result of our use of financial instruments, in particular the potential market value loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates, as well as from adverse changes in stock prices, which impact our derivative financial instrument. We do not utilize financial instruments for trading purposes. Interest Rates We are exposed to market rate risk due to changes in interest rates on our loan agreement with Bank of America that we entered into on April 2, 2008 under which we borrowed $30.0 million to fund a portion of the acquisition of certain assets of Emeril Lagasse. Interest rates applicable to amounts outstanding under this facility are at variable rates based on the 1-month LIBOR rate plus 2.85%. A change in interest rates on this variable rate debt impacts the interest incurred and cash flows but does not impact the fair value of the instrument. We had outstanding borrowings of $6.0 million on the term loan at September 30, 2011 at an average rate of 3.1% for the quarter. A one percentage point increase in the interest rate would have increased interest expense by $0.02 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. We also have exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates as those rates relate to our investment portfolio. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. We attempt to protect and preserve our invested funds by limiting default, market and reinvestment risk. To achieve this objective, we invest our excess cash in debt instruments of the United States Government and its agencies and in high-quality corporate issuers (including bank instruments and money market funds) and, by internal policy, limit both the term and amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. As of September 30, 2011, net unrealized gains and losses on these investments were not material. However, in the third quarter of 2011, we recorded approximately $0.1 million in interest income. Our future investment income may fluctuate due to changes in interest rates, or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates.
29
Table of ContentsITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Evaluation of Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have determined that, during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. The Company is party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including product liability claims for which we are indemnified by our licensees. None of these proceedings is deemed material. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the 2010 Form 10-K, under the heading Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors.
30
Table of ContentsITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
The following table provides information about our purchases of our Class A Common Stock during each month of the quarter ended September 30, 2011:
31
Table of ContentsITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
32
Table of ContentsSIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
33
Table of ContentsEXHIBIT INDEX
34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||