MRVL » Topics » Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

These excerpts taken from the MRVL 10-K filed Apr 1, 2009.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. Based on our evaluation, management has concluded that we maintained effective control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 based on the COSO criteria.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. Based on our evaluation, management has concluded that we maintained effective control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 based on the COSO criteria.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">Management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. Based on our evaluation, management has concluded that we maintained effective control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 based on the COSO criteria.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

SIZE="2">Remediation of Fiscal 2008 Material Weakness

Our management report on internal control over financial reporting for the
fiscal year ended February 2, 2008 described the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting:

SIZE="2">Control environment.    We did not maintain an effective control environment based on criteria established in the COSO framework. Specifically: (1) internal control deficiencies were not remediated in a
timely manner as our management did not exercise the necessary rigor and commitment to internal control over financial reporting and senior management was unable to timely implement the planned remediation actions of the control deficiencies
identified in fiscal 2007; (2) we did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial
reporting requirements; and (3) we did not maintain effective, timely and sufficient communication within our finance department and between our finance department and our other departments.

STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">Throughout the first three quarters of fiscal 2009, we were engaged in the implementation and testing of remedial measures to address this material
weakness. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed testing of

 


120







Table of Contents



the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls to demonstrate their operating effectiveness over a period of time sufficient to support our
conclusion that, as of January 31, 2009, we had remediated the previously reported material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.

FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">During fiscal 2009, we implemented the following remedial actions in our internal control over financial reporting to address the previously reported material weakness:

STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">(1) We completed our remediation activities during fiscal 2009 with rigor and commitment and these remediation activities specifically address
internal control deficiencies that were identified as of February 2, 2008. These remediation activities included the implementation of additional internal controls and the enhancement of certain existing internal controls in order to strengthen
the control over the monthly close and financial reporting processes. These remediation activities also included a process that, throughout fiscal 2009, tracked and monitored remediation progress and results systematically against an established
remediation timeline, until all remediation activities were completed. In addition, we proactively identified opportunities for control improvements and implemented such improvements. We also reassessed internal controls in financial reporting over
other processes that may be susceptible to potential material misstatements.

(2) We hired a permanent Chief Financial Officer effective
June 23, 2008 and a permanent General Counsel effective October 30, 2008. The permanent Chief Financial Officer is serving as the Interim Chief Operating Officer until the search for a permanent Chief Operating Officer is concluded. We
have completed the recruitment activities for the Compliance Director and we expect to fill that position in the near future. The Compliance Director will report directly to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Until the position is
filled, we engaged external resources to support and assist in our compliance efforts. We have strengthened our controls over the monthly closing and financial reporting processes by hiring personnel with knowledge, experience and training in the
application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial reporting requirements.

In
May 2007, our Board of Directors decided to implement the recommendation of our Board of Directors’ Special Committee Regarding Derivative Litigation that Dr. Sehat Sutardja remain Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of
Directors, but step down as Chairman of the Board in favor of a non-executive Chairman. This non-executive Chairman was to be selected from a group of new independent directors appointed to fill the then-three vacancies on our Board of Directors.
Since that time, we have added two new independent directors, Dr. Juergen Gromer and John G. Kassakian, to our Board of Directors, and our Board of Directors continues to search for additional independent directors. Our Board of Directors is
evaluating the roles of independent directors in the governance of the Board, and our Board of Directors will designate an independent director either as non-executive Chairman or non-executive Lead Director (if it retains an executive Chairman)
once it has completed its search for additional new independent directors.

(3) We have made significant improvements in
communication, both within our finance department and between finance and other departments, through the implementation of formalized inter-departmental and intra-departmental information exchanges on a recurring basis, and enhancements to the
design of certain internal controls to enable a more detailed review process to occur on a timely basis.

These excerpts taken from the MRVL 10-K filed Mar 28, 2008.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        Management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008 using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

        A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has determined that we have the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008:

        Control environment.    We did not maintain an effective control environment based on criteria established in the COSO framework. Specifically: (1) internal control deficiencies were not remediated in a timely manner as our management did not exercise the necessary rigor and commitment to internal control over financial reporting and senior management was unable to timely implement the planned remediation actions of the control deficiencies identified in fiscal year 2007; (2) we did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial reporting requirements; and (3) we did not maintain effective, timely and sufficient communication within our finance department and between our finance department and other departments of the Company.

132


        These control deficiencies resulted in audit adjustments relating to the valuation of intangible assets, valuation of goodwill in purchase accounting, completeness of litigation accrual, valuation of inventory, valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of accounts receivable, certain other accounts and the related financial disclosures. Additionally, these control deficiencies could result in misstatements to substantially all financial statement accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that these control deficiencies constitute a material weakness.

        As a result of the material weakness described above, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of February 2, 2008 based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

        The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



        Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



        Management
has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008 using the criteria set forth in the
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").



        A
material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has determined that we have the following material weakness in our
internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008:



        Control environment.    We did not maintain an effective control environment based on criteria established in the COSO
framework. Specifically: (1) internal control deficiencies were not remediated in a timely manner as our management did not exercise the necessary rigor and commitment to internal control over
financial reporting and senior management was unable to timely implement the planned remediation actions of the control deficiencies identified in fiscal year 2007; (2) we did not maintain a
sufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial
reporting requirements; and (3) we did not maintain effective, timely and sufficient communication within our finance department and between our finance department and other departments of the
Company.



132









        These
control deficiencies resulted in audit adjustments relating to the valuation of intangible assets, valuation of goodwill in purchase accounting, completeness of litigation accrual,
valuation of inventory, valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of accounts receivable, certain other accounts and the related financial disclosures. Additionally, these control deficiencies could
result in misstatements to substantially all financial statement accounts and disclosures that would result in a material
misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that these control deficiencies constitute a
material weakness.



        As
a result of the material weakness described above, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of February 2, 2008 based on the
criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.




        The
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



This excerpt taken from the MRVL 10-K filed Jul 2, 2007.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over the financial reporting as of January 27, 2007 did not include the internal controls of the Intel’s communications and application processor business (“ICAP Business”). We excluded the ICAP Business from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of January 27, 2007 because it was acquired in a purchase business combination in November 2006 and is now wholly owned by Marvell Technology Group Ltd. as discussed in Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The ICAP Business’ total assets and total revenues represent approximately 17% and approximately 4%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended January 27, 2007.

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 27, 2007 using the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

155




A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management has determined that we have the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of January 27, 2007:

Control environment.   We did not maintain an effective control environment based on criteria established in the COSO framework and commensurate with our rapid growth and increasing complexity. Our management, including those individuals responsible for our Finance and Legal Departments, did not exercise the necessary rigor and commitment to internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, (1) internal control deficiencies were not remediated in a timely manner; (2) certain individuals involved in the stock option process said that they did not feel able to provide frank advice to senior management regarding controls over processing, recording and reporting of stock options transactions; and (3) we did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. This lack of an effective control environment contributed to the restatement of the consolidated financial statements of annual periods through fiscal 2006, each of the quarters of fiscal year 2006, as well as the first quarter of fiscal year 2007. Additionally, this lack of an effective control environment could result in misstatements of any of our financial statement accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected; this lack of effective control environment also contributed to the material weakness described below. Accordingly, our management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

Controls over stock-based compensation expense under FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share Based Payments” (“FAS 123(R)”).   We did not maintain effective controls over the accounting for and disclosure of our stock-based compensation expense under FAS 123(R). Our controls, including monitoring controls, policies and procedures relating to the accounting for and disclosure of stock-based compensation were not effective. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained to ensure the existence, completeness, accuracy, valuation and presentation of our stock-based compensation expense. This control deficiency resulted in audit adjustments to stock-based compensation expense for the year ended January 27, 2007. This control deficiency could also result in a misstatement to compensation expense that would result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

Our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 27, 2007 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This excerpt taken from the MRVL 10-K filed Apr 13, 2006.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2006. Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2006 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

/s/ DR. SEHAT SUTARDJA
Dr. Sehat Sutardja
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 13, 2006

/s/ GEORGE A. HERVEY
George A. Hervey
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
April 13, 2006

62




Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki