|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the MRVL DEF 14A filed May 29, 2009. Tax Considerations The executive compensation committee considers the potential effects of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code on the compensation paid to our named executive officers. Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation exceeding $1 million paid in any taxable year to certain executive officers, unless the compensation is performance-based. The executive compensation committee has examined our current executive compensation program and determined that, for fiscal 2009, none of our named executive officers received compensation that would not be deductible under Section 162(m). While we cannot predict how the $1 million deduction limit may impact our executive compensation program in future years, the executive compensation committee intends to maintain an approach to executive compensation that strongly links pay to performance. While the executive compensation committee has not adopted a formal policy regarding the tax deductibility of the compensation paid to Dr. Sehat Sutardja and our other named executive officers, the executive compensation committee intends to review the tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of executive compensation. However, the executive compensation committee may, in its judgment, authorize and pay compensation that does not satisfy the requirements of this or any of the other exemptions to the $1 million deduction limit when it believes that such compensation is necessary and appropriate to attract and retain key executives. Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code imposes taxes in the event that an employee, including a named executive officer, receives deferred compensation that does not satisfy the requirements of Section 409A. Although we do not maintain a traditional nonqualified deferred compensation plan, Section 409A applies to certain severance arrangements and equity awards. Consequently, to assist our employees in avoiding the taxes imposed by Section 409A, we have structured our equity awards in a manner intended to either avoid the application of Section 409A or, to the extent doing so is not possible, comply with the applicable Section 409A requirements. This excerpt taken from the MRVL DEF 14A filed Jun 2, 2008. Tax Considerations The executive compensation committee considers the potential effects of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code on the compensation paid to our named executive officers. Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation exceeding $1 million paid in any taxable year to certain executive officers, unless the compensation is performance-based. The executive compensation committee has examined our current executive compensation program and determined that for fiscal 2008 none of our named executive officers would receive compensation that would not be deductible under Section 162(m). While we cannot predict how the $1 million deduction limit may impact our executive compensation program in future years, the executive compensation committee intends to maintain an approach to executive compensation that strongly links pay to performance. While the executive compensation committee has not adopted a formal policy regarding the tax deductibility of the compensation paid to Dr. Sehat Sutardja, our Chief Executive Officer, and our other named executive officers, the executive compensation committee intends to review the tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of executive compensation. However, the executive compensation committee may, in its judgment, authorize and pay compensation that does not satisfy the requirements of this or any of the other exemptions to the $1 million deduction limit when it believes that such compensation is necessary and appropriate to attract and retain key executives. Section 409A imposes taxes in the event that an employee, including a named executive officer receives "deferred compensation" that does not satisfy the requirements of Section 409A. Although we do not maintain a traditional nonqualified deferred compensation plan, other than as described with respect to Mr. Hervey above in "Benefits," Section 409A applies to certain severance arrangements and equity awards. Consequently, to assist our employees in avoiding the taxes imposed by Section 409A, we have structured our equity awards in a manner intended to either avoid the application of Section 409A or, to the extent doing so is not possible, comply with the applicable Section 409A requirements. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for MRVL: |
| |||||||