Maxim Integrated Products 10-Q 2012
Documents found in this filing:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Commission file number 1-34192
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
120 San Gabriel Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94086
(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [x] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [x] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):
YES [ ] NO [x]
As of April 20, 2012 there were 292,204,009 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, of the registrant outstanding.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company" or "Maxim") included herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to applicable rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. The year-end condensed balance sheet data were derived from audited consolidated financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The results of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. These condensed interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2011.
The Company has a 52-to-53-week fiscal year that ends on the last Saturday in June. Accordingly, every fifth or sixth fiscal year will be a 53-week fiscal year. Fiscal year 2012 is a 53-week fiscal year. The extra week was included in our second fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011.
NOTE 2: RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-08 relating to Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)-Testing Goodwill for Impairment (ASU 2011-08). The ASU allows an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that it is more likely than not, an entity is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. ASU 2011-08 is effective for Maxim in fiscal 2013 and earlier adoption is permitted.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05 relating to Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)-Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05), which requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The ASU is effective for Maxim in fiscal 2013 and should be applied retrospectively.
NOTE 3: BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
Accounts receivables, net consist of:
Inventories consist of:
Property, plant and equipment, net consist of:
NOTE 4: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The FASB established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as follows:
Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
The Company's Level 1 assets consist of money market funds.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
The Company's Level 2 assets and liabilities consist of certificates of deposit, government agency securities and foreign currency forward contracts.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The Company's Level 3 liabilities consist of contingent consideration related to certain acquisitions. For details on inputs used in measuring fair value, please refer to Note 13: Acquisitions to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
(1) Included in Cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) Included in Short-term investments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(3) Included in Other current assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(4) Included in Accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The tables below present reconciliations for liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and for the twelve months ended June 25, 2011:
The valuation of contingent consideration was based on a probability weighted earnouts model which relied primarily on estimates of milestone achievements and discount rates applicable for the period expected payout. The most significant unobservable input used in the determination of estimated fair value of contingent consideration is the estimates on the likelihood of milestone achievements, which directly correlates to the fair value recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. .
The fair value of this liability is estimated on a quarterly basis by Management using a collaborative effort of the Company's engineering and accounting departments. The determination of the milestone achievement is performed by the Company's engineering department and reviewed by the accounting department. Potential valuation adjustments are made as the progress toward achieving milestones becomes determinable with the impact of such adjustments being recorded through interest and other expense, net.
As of March 31, 2012 and June 25, 2011, there were no transfers in or out of level 3 from other levels in the fair value hierarchy.
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were as follows:
As of March 31, 2012, long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying amount of $11.3 million were written down to their fair value, less cost to sell of $3.6 million, resulting in an impairment loss of $7.7 million, which was included in earnings for the period. The impairment charge was measured using level 3 inputs. The fair value of the equipment was determined mainly after consideration of quoted market prices of similar equipment adjusted for equipment specifications and condition in addition to the current market demand and size. Please refer to Note 15: Impairment of long-lived assets to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of June 25, 2011, none of the Company's assets and liabilities were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
NOTE 5: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair values were as follows:
In the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended June 25, 2011, Maxim did not recognize any impairment charges on short-term investments.
The government agency securities have maturity dates between February 26, 2013 and December 18, 2013.
Derivative instruments and hedging activities
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company generates revenues in various global markets based on orders obtained in non-U.S. currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen, the Euro and the British Pound. Maxim incurs expenditures denominated in non-U.S. currencies, principally the Philippine Pesos and Thai Baht associated with the Company's manufacturing activities in the Philippines and Thailand, respectively, and expenditures for sales offices and research and development activities undertaken outside of the U.S. Maxim is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates primarily on orders and accounts receivable from sales in these foreign currencies and cash flows for expenditures in these foreign currencies. Maxim has established risk management strategies designed to reduce the impact of volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in the exchange rate for these currencies. These strategies reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rates movements. Maxim does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company routinely hedges its exposures to certain foreign currencies with various financial institutions in an effort to minimize the impact of certain currency exchange rate fluctuations. If a financial counter party to any of the Company's hedging arrangements experiences financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency hedge, the Company may experience financial losses.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") No. 815-Derivatives and Hedging, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified into earnings into the same financial statement line as the item being hedged, and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in interest and other expense, net.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC No. 815, gains and losses are recognized in interest and other expense, net. All derivatives are foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. The gains and losses on these derivatives largely offset the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Maxim estimates the fair value of derivatives primarily based on pricing models using current market rates and records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The gross notional and the recorded fair value of derivative financial instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
(1) Represents the face amounts of contracts that were outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and June 25, 2011, as applicable.
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
The following table provides the balances and changes in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivative instruments during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended June 25, 2011.
Maxim expects to reclassify an estimated net accumulated other comprehensive gain of $0.2 million, net of taxes, to earnings in the next twelve months along with the earnings effects of the related forecasted transactions in association with cash flow hedges.
The before-tax effect of cash flow derivative instruments for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011 was as follows:
The before-tax effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011 was as follows:
Volume of Derivative Activity
Total net U.S. Dollar notional amounts for foreign currency forward contracts, presented by net currency purchase (sell), are as follows:
The following table summarizes the Company's long-term debt:
(1) Current portion of long-term debt is included under accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On June 17, 2010, the Company completed a public offering of $300 million aggregate principal amount of the Company's 3.45% senior unsecured notes due on June 14, 2013, with an effective interest rate of 3.49%. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 14 and December 14 of each year. The Notes are governed by base and supplemental indentures dated June 10, 2010 and June 17, 2010, respectively, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee.
In conjunction with the SensorDynamics acquisition as discussed in Note 13: Acquisitions to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Maxim acquired certain fixed and floating rate notes as detailed in the table above.
The Company accounts for the Notes based on their amortized cost. The discount and expenses are being amortized to Interest and other expense, net over the life of the Notes. Interest expense associated with the Notes was $3.0 million and $2.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively. Interest expense associated with the Notes was $10.1 million and $8.4 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively. The interest expense is recorded in Interest and other expense, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The estimated fair value of Maxim's debt was approximately $319 million at March 31, 2012. The estimated fair value of the debt is based primarily on quoted market prices.
As of March 31, 2012, the Company had the capacity to issue an unspecified amount of additional debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, rights and units under its 2010 Shelf Registration Statement.
On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into a $250 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility with certain institutional lenders that expires on October 13, 2016. The Company agreed to pay the lenders a facility fee at a rate per annum that varies based on the Company's index debt rating. Any advances under the credit agreement will accrue interest at a base rate plus a margin based on the Company's debt index rating. The credit agreement requires the Company to comply with certain covenants, including a requirement that the Company maintain a ratio of debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of not more than 3 to 1 and a minimum interest coverage ratio (EBITDA divided by interest expense) greater than 3.5 to 1. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had not borrowed any amounts from this credit facility.
Other Financial Instruments
For the balance of Maxim's financial instruments, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
NOTE 6: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense by type of award, and the resulting tax effect, included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011:
The following table shows pre-tax stock-based compensation expense by income statement classification:
The fair value of options granted to employees under the Company's 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and rights to acquire common stock under the Company's 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP") is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") is estimated using the value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the present value of dividends expected to be paid on the Company's common stock prior to vesting.
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatilities from the Company's traded common stock over a period equal to the expected term. The Company is utilizing the simplified method to estimate expected holding periods. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield. The Company determines the dividend yield by dividing the annualized dividends per share by the prior quarter's average stock price. The result is analyzed by the Company to decide whether it represents expected future dividend yield. The Company also estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and makes revisions to forfeitures on a quarterly basis.
The fair value of share-based awards granted to employees has been estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following weighted-average assumptions:
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted was $6.53 and $6.25 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of RSUs granted was $25.38 and $24.39 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively.
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted was $5.85 and $3.85 per share for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of RSUs granted was $20.46 and $15.60 per share for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively.
The following table summarizes outstanding, exercisable and vested and expected to vest stock options as of March 31, 2012 and their activity for the nine months ended March 31, 2012:
As of March 31, 2012, there was $36.4 million of total unrecognized stock compensation cost related to 11.5 million unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years.
Restricted Stock Units
The following table summarizes outstanding and expected to vest RSUs as of March 31, 2012 and their activity during the nine months ended March 31, 2012:
The Company withheld shares totaling $7.7 million and $22.7 million in value as a result of employee withholding taxes based on the value of the RSUs on their vesting date as determined by the Company's closing stock price for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, respectively. The total payments for the employees' tax obligations to the taxing authorities are reflected as financing activities within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
As of March 31, 2012, there was $128.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to 9.8 million unvested RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.6 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
As of March 31, 2012, there was $4.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the ESPP.
NOTE 7: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. For purposes of computing basic earnings per share, the weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock excludes unvested RSUs. Diluted earnings per share incorporates the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options, assumed release of unvested RSUs and assumed issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plans using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Approximately 12.2 million and 14.4 million stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively. Approximately 14.1 million and 17.8 million stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and March 26, 2011, respectively. These options were excluded because they were determined to be antidilutive. However, such options could be dilutive in the future and, under those circumstances, would be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
NOTE 8: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates and tracks its results as one reportable segment. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of analog integrated circuits. The Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker.
The Company has sixteen operating segments which aggregate into one reportable segment. Two or more operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating segment for financial reporting purposes if the segments have similar economic characteristics and if the segments are similar in each of the following areas:
The Company meets each of the aggregation criteria for the following reasons:
All of the Company's operating segments share similar economic characteristics as they have a similar long term business model. The causes for variation among the Company's operating segments are the same and include factors such as (i) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations, (ii) number of competitors, (iii) product differentiation and (iv) size of market opportunity. Additionally, each operating segment is subject to the overall cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry. The number and composition of employees and the amounts and types of tools and materials required are similar for each operating segment. Finally, even though the Company periodically reorganizes its operating segments based upon changes in customers, end-markets or products, acquisitions, long-term growth strategies and the experience and bandwidth of the senior executives in charge, the common financial goals for each operating segment remain constant.
Enterprise-wide information is provided in accordance with GAAP. Geographical revenue information is based on customers' ship-to location. Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment information is based on the physical location of the assets at the end of each reporting period.
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers by geographic region were as follows:
Net long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows:
NOTE 9: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The changes in the components of Other Comprehensive Income, net of taxes, were as follows:
The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, were as follows:
NOTE 10: INCOME TAXES
In the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $88.9 million and $152.5 million, respectively, compared to an income tax provision of $26.1 million and $122.4 million in the three and nine months ended March 26, 2011, respectively. In addition, in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 the Company recorded income tax of $13.6 million related to discontinued operations that was netted against income from discontinued operations.
The Company's federal corporate income tax returns for fiscal years 2009 and 2010 are being audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 the Internal Revenue Service will commence an audit of Company's federal corporate income tax return for the fiscal 2011. The Company believes it has adequately provided for any adjustments that may result from
NOTE 11: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Stock Option Litigation
Beginning on or about May 22, 2006, several derivative actions were filed against certain current and former executive officers and directors of the Company alleging, among other things, wrongful conduct of back-dating stock options as well as security law violations, and named the Company as a nominal defendant against whom the plaintiffs sought no recovery.
The parties to the derivative litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery entered into a stipulated settlement agreement, which was approved by the Delaware Court of Chancery on September 16, 2008. All derivative actions pending in the California Superior Court have since been dismissed, with prejudice. Net settlement proceeds of $18.9 million were received by the Company on September 10, 2009. The Company recognized an increase to additional paid in capital of $2.5 million related to excess gains while the remainder of the proceeds of $16.4 million was recorded as a reduction to Other operating (income) expenses, net.
On February 6, 2008, a putative class action complaint was filed against the Company and certain former officers and employees in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging claims under the federal securities laws based on certain alleged misrepresentations and omissions in the Company's public disclosures concerning its stock option accounting practices. On June 18, 2010, lead plaintiffs and the Company entered into a stipulation of settlement settling the action and providing for the payment of $173.0 million in cash by the Company. The Company made this payment in July 2010. On September 29, 2010, the Court issued a Final Order and Judgment approving the settlement.
Other Legal Proceedings
In addition to the above proceedings, the Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of the Company's business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters arising in the normal course of business will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
The Company indemnifies certain customers, distributors, suppliers and subcontractors for attorney fees, damages and costs awarded against such parties in certain circumstances in which the Company's products are alleged to infringe third party intellectual property rights, including patents, registered trademarks or copyrights. The terms of the Company's indemnification obligations are generally perpetual from the effective date of the agreement. In certain cases, there are limits on and exceptions to the Company's potential liability for indemnification relating to intellectual property infringement claims.
Legal Fees Associated with Indemnification Obligations, Defense and Other Related Costs
Pursuant to the Company's charter documents, the Company has certain indemnification obligations to its officers and directors and certain former officers and directors. The Company also has separate written indemnification agreements with our current and former executive officers and directors. Pursuant to such obligations, the Company has incurred expenses related to legal fees and expenses advanced to certain former officers of the Company subject to civil charges by the SEC in connection with Maxim's historical stock option granting practices. The Company expenses such amounts as incurred.
NOTE 12: COMMON STOCK REPURCHASES
In August 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $750 million of the Company's common stock from time to time at the discretion of the Company's management. This stock repurchase authorization has no expiration date. All prior authorizations by the Company's Board of Directors for the repurchase of common stock were canceled and superseded by this authorization.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2012, the Company repurchased approximately 7.8 million shares of its common stock for $190.1 million. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had remaining authorization to repurchase up to an additional $607.5 million of the Company's common stock. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of such repurchases will be based on several factors, including the price of the Company's common stock and general market and business conditions.
NOTE 13: ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions completed during fiscal 2012
The purchase price allocation for acquisitions completed in fiscal 2012 is set forth in the table below and reflects various preliminary fair value estimates and analysis, including preliminary work performed by third-party valuation specialists, which are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date) as valuations are finalized. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized are the determination of the deferred tax assets and liabilities and residual goodwill.
Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to Maxim's condensed consolidated results of income, either individually or in the aggregate. Revenue and earnings per share for the acquired businesses since the date of acquisition through March 31, 2012 were not provided as they are not material. Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Acquisition costs for fiscal 2012 were not material.
Aggregate preliminary purchase price allocation for acquisitions made by Maxim during fiscal 2012:
(1) Includes $11.4 million of contingent consideration relating to the other acquisitions discussed further below.
The following table present details of the Company's intangible assets acquired through business combinations completed during fiscal 2012 (in thousands, except years):