|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the MFE 10-Q filed Dec 21, 2007. Income
Taxes
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48, effective
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period. See
Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
for further discussion of the impact of adoption of FIN 48.
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the MFE 10-Q filed Dec 21, 2007. Income
Taxes
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48, effective
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period. See
Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
for further discussion of the impact of adoption of FIN 48.
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the MFE 10-Q filed Dec 21, 2007. Income
Taxes
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period. See
Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
for further discussion of the impact of adoption of FIN 48.
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the MFE 10-K filed Mar 1, 2006. Income
Taxes
In December 2004, the FASB issued FSP 109-2, Accounting
and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation
Provision within the American Jobs Creations Act of 2004, or
AJCA. The AJCA introduces a limited time 85% dividends received
deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a
United States taxpayer (repatriation provision), provided
certain criteria are met. FSP 109-2 provides accounting and
disclosure guidance for the repatriation provision. We have
adopted the accounting and disclosure requirements as outlined
in
FAS 109-2.
See Note 17 for further information regarding this
provision.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for MFE: |
| |||||||