|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the NDAQ 8-K filed Feb 20, 2008. Estimated fair values of licenses related to technology and the Nasdaq brand name Technology licenses Nasdaq used the relief from royalty method in valuing DIFXs right to future OMX/Nasdaq technology. We researched publicly available license agreements for companies comparable to OMX/Nasdaq that were licensing similar technology. These license agreements yielded an average royalty rate of 5.0% for comparable licensing agreements. We applied the selected royalty rate to DIFXs projected revenue stream, based on managements estimates. The tax rate in Dubai is zero. The resulting cash flows were discounted using a rate of 19.0%. The discount rate was developed using the comparable public company data and economic data reflecting the risk environment in DIFXs market area. The discount rate is based on the capital asset pricing model and represents the weighted average cost of capital. Trade name The Nasdaq trade name was valued using an excess earnings model. The trade name revenue stream includes the incremental revenue streams that DIFX will generate as a result of Nasdaq entering into an arrangement with DIFX. The margins for the trade names were the same as those for the overall business. A contributory asset charge for the use of other assets (i.e., working capital, fixed assets, the technology, and assembled work force) was deducted from the after-tax operating income yielding the excess earnings generated by the trade name, which were discounted at a rate of 19.0%. |
| |||||||