|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
These excerpts taken from the NFLX 10-K filed Feb 28, 2008. Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
In 2007 and 2006, our effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% principally due to state income taxes. In 2005, we recorded an income tax benefit of $33.7 million on pretax income of $8.3 million. Our 2005 income tax benefit includes a tax benefit for the reduction in the valuation allowance of $34.9 million. In 2005 we reduced the valuation allowance after determining that substantially all deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realizable due to expected future income. Provision for (Benefit
In 2007 and 2006, our effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% We have generated our content library and the depreciation of property and equipment. Our primary uses of cash include the acquisition of content, marketing and fulfillment expenses. FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">In 2008, operating cash flows will be a significant source of liquidity, while the acquisition of content, marketing and fulfillment expenses will continue to be significant uses of cash. In addition, on
38 Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the NFLX 10-K filed Feb 28, 2007. Provision for (benefit from) Income Taxes
37
Table of ContentsIn 2006 our effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% principally due to state income taxes and benefits related to stock-based compensation. In 2005, we recorded an income tax benefit of $33.7 million on pretax income of $8.3 million. Our 2005 income tax benefit includes a tax benefit for the reduction in the valuation allowance of $34.9 million. We continuously monitor the circumstances impacting the expected realization of our deferred tax assets. In the fourth quarter of 2005 we reduced the valuation allowance after determining that substantially all deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realizable due to expected future income. In 2004, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.2 million on a pre-tax income of $21.8 million. Our effective tax rates for 2004 and 2005 differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to changes in the valuation allowance and benefits related to stock based compensation. We currently anticipate that our effective tax rate will be approximately 40% in 2007. This excerpt taken from the NFLX 10-Q filed May 9, 2006. Provision for (benefit from) Income Taxes
In the first quarter of 2006 we recorded an income tax expense of $2.8 million (39% effective tax rate), compared to tax expense of $44 thousand for the first quarter of 2005. Our tax expense is higher in 2006 because we no longer have a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, the realization of which served to minimize tax expense in prior years. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2005 we only recorded income tax expense related to currently payable alternative minimum tax liabilities. In the fourth quarter of 2005 we recorded an income tax benefit due to a reduction in our valuation allowance of $34.9 million. We continuously monitor the circumstances impacting the expected realization of our deferred tax assets. In the fourth quarter of 2005, based on our then updated forecast of future projected income and as a result of current developments in the competitive landscape, we reduced the valuation allowance after determining that substantially all deferred tax assets were more likely than not to be realized due to expected future income.
This excerpt taken from the NFLX 10-K filed Mar 16, 2006. Provision for (benefit from) Income Taxes
35
Table of ContentsIn 2005, we recorded an income tax benefit of $33.7 million on pretax income of $8.3 million. Our 2005 income tax benefit includes a tax benefit for the reduction in the valuation allowance of $34.9 million. We continuously monitor the circumstances impacting the expected realization of our deferred tax assets. In the fourth quarter of 2005 we reduced the valuation allowance after determining that substantially all deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realizable due to expected future income. In 2004, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.2 million on a pre-tax income of $21.8 million. Our effective tax rates for all years differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the valuation allowance in all years.
We currently anticipate that our effective tax rate will be approximately 41% in 2006. The effective rate will be impacted, favorably or unfavorably, by the effect of book and tax stock option expenses in 2006.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||