|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
Newfield Exploration Company 10-K 2008 Documents found in this filing:
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Commission file
number: 1-12534
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
281-847-6000
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $6 billion as of June 30, 2007 (based on
the last sale price of such stock as quoted on the New York
Stock Exchange).
As of February 25, 2008, there were 131,496,126 shares
of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, outstanding.
Documents incorporated by reference: Proxy Statement of Newfield
Exploration Company for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held May 1, 2008, which is incorporated by reference into
Part III of this
Form 10-K.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Table of Contents
If you are not familiar with any of the oil and gas terms
used in this report, we have provided explanations of many of
them under the caption Commonly Used Oil and Gas
Terms at the end of Item 7 of this report. Unless the
context otherwise requires, all references in this report to
Newfield, we, us or
our are to Newfield Exploration Company and its
subsidiaries. Unless otherwise noted, all information in this
report relating to oil and gas reserves and the estimated future
net cash flows attributable to those reserves are based on
estimates we prepared and are net to our interest.
We are an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
exploration, development and acquisition of natural gas and
crude oil properties. Our domestic areas of operation include
the Anadarko and Arkoma Basins of the Mid-Continent, the Rocky
Mountains, onshore Texas and the Gulf of Mexico.
Internationally, we are active in Malaysia and China.
General information about us can be found at
www.newfield.com. Our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as any amendments and exhibits to those reports, are
available free of charge through our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after we file or furnish them.
Information contained at our website is not incorporated by
reference into this report and you should not consider
information contained at our website as part of this report.
Our company was founded in 1989. For the first 10 years of
our existence, we focused on the shallow waters of the Gulf of
Mexico. In the late-1990s, we began to expand our operations
into other regions to gain access to properties and
opportunities necessary for our continued growth. Cash flows
from our Gulf of Mexico operations funded this expansion. Today,
our asset base and related capital programs are diversified both
geographically and by type offshore and onshore,
domestic and international, conventional plays and
unconventional resource plays, a large inventory of
low risk exploitation and development opportunities and a
smaller, but significant, inventory of higher risk, higher
reserve potential exploration opportunities.
At year-end 2007, we had proved reserves of 2.5 Tcfe. Those
reserves were 73% natural gas and 63% proved developed. As a
result of our focus on unconventional resource plays
in the Rocky Mountains and Mid-Continent and the sale of our
shallow water Gulf of Mexico assets in August 2007, our reserve
life index is now more than 10 years. Of our year-end 2007
reserves:
By geographical region, we expect the sources of our 2008
budgeted production will be:
Table of Contents
In part, the changes in our asset base are reflective of broader
trends underway in our industry. As the traditional producing
basins in the U.S. have matured, exploration and production
has shifted to unconventional resource plays.
Resource plays typically cover expansive areas, provide
multi-year inventories of drilling opportunities and have
sustainable lower risk growth profiles. The economics of these
plays rely on technological advances, hands on experience,
repeatability and strong commodity prices. Today, we have two
large resource plays the Woodford Shale and Monument
Butte and are active in several other plays.
Mid-Continent. Our largest single
investment area over the last two years has been the Woodford
Shale play, located in the Arkoma Basin of southeast Oklahoma.
Our activities began in this area in 2003, and our early success
in drilling led to the leasing of approximately 165,000 net
acres. Since 2003, we have drilled more than 100 vertical
wells and 160 horizontal wells to delineate our acreage
position. The Woodford formation is a shale interval that varies
in thickness from 100200 feet throughout our acreage.
At year-end 2007, our production was 165 MMcfe/d gross. The
field has thousands of drilling locations. Our efforts are
focused primarily on determining the appropriate spacing for our
development wells. In 2008, we will drill pilots on both 40- and
80-acre
spacing.
In addition to the Woodford Shale, our activities in the
Mid-Continent are focused on the Mountain Front Wash play in the
Anadarko Basin. Our production there reached a record level of
97 MMcfe/d
in early 2008. Our largest producing field in the play is Stiles
Ranch, where our working interest is predominately 100%.
Monument Butte. In August 2004, we
purchased the giant Monument Butte oil field, located in the
Uinta Basin of northeastern Utah. Since our acquisition, we have
drilled nearly 700 wells. At year-end 2007, the field had
more than 1,100 producing oil wells and gross daily production
was nearly 14,000 BOPD. The field has thousands of remaining
infill drilling opportunities. As in past years, we plan to
drill approximately 200 wells in the field in 2008. Our
activity levels in the field are dictated, in large part, by
refining demand in the region and our ability to obtain drilling
permits in a timely manner. Recent increased demand for Monument
Butte crude oil is encouraging, and we expect to have sufficient
drilling permits to allow us to run a four or five rig drilling
program throughout 2008.
Green River Basin. More than half of
the proved reserves associated with the 2007 Rockies acquisition
are located in the Pinedale field in Sublette County, Wyoming.
We acquired interests in 8,000 gross acres (4,000 net acres) in
the southeastern portion of the anticline. We see the potential
to drill 100 additional locations as field spacing is
decreased to 20 acres and eventually 10 acres. In
2007, we reached an agreement to assume operatorship of our
activities in Pinedale. Approximately 13% of the reserves in our
2007 Rocky Mountain acquisition were located in the Jonah field,
where we have identified more than 40 development locations
on 10- and
5-acre well
spacing.
Williston Basin. Approximately 20% of
the reserves associated with our 2007 Rockies acquisition were
located in the Williston Basin. We have an interest in
approximately 150,000 net acres. Current net production is
more than 3,200 BOPD and has benefited from a recent well
re-fracture program and new drilling in the Elm Coulee field, a
mature Bakken play. Other targeted formations include the
Madison, Red River and Duperow.
Continued
Focus on Conventional Plays
We remain active in conventional plays in onshore Texas, the
Gulf of Mexico and offshore Malaysia and China.
Onshore Texas. We are active in several
plays in South Texas, in the Val Verde Basin of West Texas and
in plays in East Texas. In South Texas, we have been very active
under a joint venture agreement with ExxonMobil that is focused
on the Frio play. This joint venture allows us to access new
properties and to apply our knowledge in this area. Over the
last three years, we have drilled 23 successful wells and grown
production from zero to
75 MMcfe/d
gross as of year-end 2007. Our wells in South Texas have high
initial production rates and steep declines, so continued
drilling is required to grow production. In the Val Verde Basin,
our efforts are focused on the Canyon, Strawn and Ellenberger
formations. Since entering the basin in
Table of Contents
2002, we have grown production from approximately
20 MMcfe/d to approximately 70 MMcfe/d in early 2008.
We have an interest in 130,000 gross acres. We believe that
we have an opportunity for future growth in this area but growth
will largely depend on our ability to have exploration success.
Gulf of Mexico. Today, our efforts in
the Gulf of Mexico are primarily focused on the deepwater. Our
deepwater programs provide us with significant reserve exposure
and represent a substantial component of our ongoing exploration
efforts. We have two field developments underway and plans to
drill four or five deepwater exploratory wells per year for the
next several years from an inventory of leads and prospects we
acquired in recent lease sales. Although we sold our shallow
water Gulf of Mexico assets in 2007, we continue to make
selective investments there to take advantage of the regional
expertise of our employees and our significant
3-D seismic
data base.
International. We are active offshore
Malaysia and China. We expect that more than 75% of our 2008
international budget will be spent in Malaysia, where we have
several oil fields under development. Our activities in Malaysia
began in 2004, and we continue to seek new opportunities. In
China, we are producing 1,200 BOPD net from Bohai Bay. We
also have three offshore exploration concessions we
began drilling on two of these concessions in late 2007.
The elements of our growth strategy have remained substantially
unchanged since our founding and consist of:
Drilling Program. The components of our
drilling program reflect the significant changes in our asset
base over the last few years. To manage the risks associated
with our strategy to grow reserves through the drill bit, a
substantial majority of the wells we plan to drill in 2008 are
lower risk with low to moderate reserve potential. We have
lower-risk drilling opportunities in the Mid-Continent, the
Rockies and the shallow waters of Malaysia. These opportunities
are complemented with higher risk higher reserve potential plays
in areas like the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and Malaysia, as well
as deeper exploration plays in South Texas.
Acquisitions. Acquisitions have
consistently been a part of our strategy, particularly when
entering new geographic regions. Since 2000, we have completed
four significant acquisitions that led to the establishment of
focus areas onshore U.S. We actively pursue the acquisition of
proved oil and gas properties in select geographic areas. The
potential to add reserves through the drill bit is a critical
consideration in our acquisition screening process.
Geographic Focus. We believe that our
long-term success requires extensive knowledge of the geologic
and operating conditions in the areas where we operate. Because
of this belief, we focus our efforts on a limited number of
geographic areas where we can use our core competencies and have
a significant influence on operations. Geographic focus also
allows more efficient use of capital and personnel.
Control of Operations and Costs. In
general, we prefer to operate our properties. By controlling
operations, we can better manage production performance, control
operating expenses and capital expenditures, consider the
application of technologies and influence timing. At year-end
2007, we operated about 75% of our net total production.
Equity Ownership and Incentive
Compensation. We want our employees to act
like owners, so we reward and encourage them through equity
ownership and performance-based compensation. A significant
portion of our employees compensation is contingent on our
profitability. As of February 25, 2008, our employees owned
or had options to acquire 7% of our outstanding common stock on
a diluted basis.
Table of Contents
Our capital budget for 2008 is approximately $1.6 billion,
excluding $113 million of capitalized interest and
overhead. We do not budget for potential acquisitions.
Approximately 40% of the budget is allocated to the
Mid-Continent, 20% to the Rocky Mountains, 15% to onshore Texas,
15% to the Gulf of Mexico and 10% to international projects. Our
most significant investment projects are detailed below.
Mid-Continent. Our activities in the
Mid-Continent are focused primarily in the Anadarko and Arkoma
Basins. As of December 31, 2007, we owned an interest in
more than 750,000 gross acres and about 2,600 gross
producing wells. This region is characterized by longer-lived
natural gas production. Although our wells in this region are
all fracture stimulated and have high initial production
declines, our activity levels are leading to production growth.
For 2008, we plan to invest about $620 million in the
Mid-Continent. In total, we expect to drill or participate in
approximately 200 wells in this focus area in 2008. We have
two major activity areas in the region the Woodford
Shale in the Arkoma Basin and the Mountain Front Wash play in
the Anadarko Basin.
The Woodford Shale play is our most active focus
area we plan to invest about $460 million in
the play in 2008. We expect to operate 1012 drilling rigs
throughout the year, allowing us to drill about 100 operated
horizontal wells. More than half of the wells will have lateral
completions in excess of 3,000 feet. Longer laterals help
improve our per unit finding and development costs. Nearly half
of the planned wells will be drilled from common surface
locations or pads, decreasing the footprint of our operations on
the environment and providing further cost efficiencies. Our
average working interest in the play is approximately 58%. In
addition, we also will participate in the drilling of
5060 wells operated by others.
We are planning to operate a 35 rig drilling program
throughout 2008 in our Mountain Front Wash play. We expect to
drill 6070 wells and invest up to $120 million in the
play.
Rocky Mountains. As of
December 31, 2007, we owned an interest in about
1.2 million gross acres, approximately 1,800 gross
producing wells and 445 water injection wells. Our assets in the
Rockies are nearly 70% oil and have long-lived production. In
2007, we acquired the Rocky Mountain assets of Stone Energy for
$578 million, adding 200 Bcfe of proved reserves and
exposure to new basins.
Our largest asset in the Rocky Mountains is the Monument Butte
oil field. The field accounts for nearly 20% of year-end 2007
total proved reserves and encompasses more than
100,000 acres. Our working interest in the field averages
86%, and we operate the field and control the timing and pace of
our operations. We have thousands of remaining infill drilling
locations. Our production growth is influenced by the demand for
our black wax crude from refiners in the Salt Lake City, Utah,
area and our ability to obtain drilling permits in a timely
manner. Substantially all of our Monument Butte production at
year-end 2007 was being sold under firm contracts. Production
from Monument Butte has benefited from increased demand for its
black wax crude oil. We are working to secure additional
long-term agreements with refiners. Please see the discussion
under Production growth at Monument Butte may be
limited by the demand for our crude oil production in
Item 1A of this report.
We plan to drill 200 wells at Monument Butte in 2008. Our
plans include the ongoing development of the field on
40-acre
spacing, the conversion of existing producing wells to
waterflood injector wells and an increasing number of
20-acre
spaced infill wells. Over the last two years, we have drilled
more than 50 wells on
20-acre
spacing. Results indicate the potential to develop a large
portion of the field on
20-acre
spacing. A drilling rig is dedicated to this program in 2008.
In 2006, we signed an alliance with the Northern Ute Tribe,
allowing us to drill wells on 47,000 gross acres located
north and adjacent to Monument Butte. As of mid-February 2008,
we had drilled 16 successful wells on this acreage and
production has been consistent with wells in the main portion of
the field. We will have a rig dedicated to drilling wells on
this acreage throughout most of 2008.
There also is the potential for significant gas resources
beneath the shallow producing oil sands at Monument Butte.
Recent industry wells, as well as a few wells on our acreage
that we have participated in, provide encouragement that the
Wasatch, Mesa Verde, Blackhawk and Mancos Shale formations can
be
Table of Contents
exploited economically. We have signed an agreement with a third
party that allows for promoted exploratory drilling and
progressive earning in approximately 71,000 net acres in
which we will retain a majority interest. Drilling under this
agreement is expected to commence in the second quarter of 2008.
Approximately 10,000 net acres in the immediate vicinity of
our recent deep gas tests were excluded from the agreement and
we plan to drill several wells on this acreage in 2008.
In the Green River Basin, we are active in the Pinedale and
Jonah fields. We plan to drill 10 wells at Pinedale in 2008.
Through an agreement reached in 2007, we assumed operatorship of
the drilling program and increased our working interest to 85%.
In the Jonah field, we are planning to drill five wells in 2008.
For 2008, we plan to drill at least 10 wells and invest
approximately $50 million in the Williston Basin, including
seismic purchases. Prospective targets in this region include
the Madison, Red River and Duperow formations.
Onshore Texas. As of December 31,
2007, we owned an interest in approximately 350,000 gross
acres and about 650 gross producing wells onshore Texas.
We are active in most of the major producing trends in South
Texas, including the Frio, Wilcox and Lobo plays. Our largest
investment in South Texas in 2008 will be the Frio Trend. We
have an interest in more than 60,000 acres in this trend,
which is located primarily in Kenedy, Hidalgo, Brooks and Zapata
Counties. In East Texas, we have an interest in 30,000 net
acres, of which 11,000 net acres are associated with a
joint venture with a private company.
To date, we have been very successful in a joint venture in
Kenedy County with ExxonMobil adjacent to our existing Sarita
field. Since the formation of the joint venture in 2005, we have
drilled 23 successful wells and have a similar inventory of
drilling locations. The area of activity today encompasses about
2,700 gross acres. The prospective horizons are numerous
and gas is prevalent from 10,000 feet to as deep as
20,000 feet. Production at year-end 2007 was approximately
75 MMcfe/d gross. Our interest in the joint venture is
approximately 50%.
In 2007, we formed a 40,000-acre joint venture with a private
company that covers lands south and east of our existing
ExxonMobil joint venture and also targets Frio horizons.
Drilling is planned to begin in early 2008.
In the Val Verde Basin, we have an interest in nearly
130,000 gross acres located primarily in Val Verde, Terrell
and Edwards Counties. At year-end 2007, our gross production
from the area was approximately 70 MMcfe/d. Our working
interests range from
50-100%. We
plan to drill 1012 wells in the basin in 2008.
Gulf of Mexico. Our activities in the
Gulf of Mexico are primarily focused on deepwater. At year-end
2007, our net daily production from the deepwater was nearly
40 MMcfe/d from four fields. As of December 31, 2007,
we owned interests in 61 leases in deepwater (approximately
300,000 gross acres). We also own interests in 26
conventional shallow water lease blocks and a 1025%
interest in 85 shallow water lease blocks related to the ultra
deep Treasure Project concept.
In the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, we have been active in recent
lease sales and expect to continue this effort in 2008. We now
have an inventory of prospects that will allow us to drill four
or five exploratory wells per year over the next several years.
We have two field developments underway in deepwater that will
grow our production in the second half of 2008 and early 2009.
Our exploration efforts in deepwater can be classified into two
distinct categories prospects near existing
infrastructure and those requiring stand-alone developments. The
prospects located near infrastructure are generally smaller and
lower risk than those requiring a stand-alone development. We
prefer to operate prospects near existing infrastructure with
interests ranging from 5070%. Stand-alone developments are
generally in deeper water (greater than 5,500 feet) and
typically have long lead times. We often manage our exposure to
these higher risk prospects by taking a smaller working interest
or selling down our interest on a promoted basis.
Table of Contents
International. Our activities are
focused primarily offshore Malaysia and China. We plan to invest
$155 million in international activities in 2008, of which
approximately 60% is dedicated to the ongoing development of oil
fields offshore Malaysia.
Our shallow water concessions in Malaysia include a 50%
non-operated interest in PM 318 and a 60% operated interest in
PM 323. On PM 318, our Abu field commenced production in 2007
and production at year-end 2007 was approximately 14,000 BOPD
gross. Our Puteri field is expected to commence production in
the second quarter of 2008 and is expected to produce
6,0008,000 BOPD gross. We have additional fields that will
be developed and produced through existing infrastructure on
this 414,000 acre concession. On PM 323, we are developing
the East Belumut and Chermingat fields. First production is
expected in mid-2008. These fields are expected to produce about
15,000 BOPD gross. We have additional exploration prospects on
this 320,000 acre concession.
On deepwater Block 2C offshore Sarawak, which covers
1.1 million acres, we plan to drill our second commitment
well in the second half of 2008. We will operate the exploratory
well with a 40% interest.
In China, we are producing approximately 1,200 BOPD net from
Bohai Bay. We also signed agreements with respect to three new
blocks in the South China Sea that cover approximately
3.5 million gross acres. At year-end 2007, we were in the
process of drilling two consecutive exploration wells on these
concessions.
For revenues from our domestic and international operations, see
Note 15, Segment Information, to our
consolidated financial statements appearing later in this report.
Please see the discussion under the caption
Forward-Looking Information in Item 7 of this
report.
Substantially all of our natural gas and oil production is sold
to a variety of purchasers under short-term (less than
12 months) contracts at market sensitive prices. For a list
of purchasers of our oil and gas production that accounted for
10% or more of our consolidated revenue for the three preceding
calendar years, please see Note 1, Organization and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Major
Customers, to our consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the loss of any of these purchasers would not
have a material adverse effect on us because alternative
purchasers are readily available.
Competition in the oil and gas industry is intense, particularly
with respect to the hiring and retention of technical personnel,
the acquisition of properties and access to drilling rigs and
other services in deepwater in the Gulf of Mexico. For a further
discussion, please see the information regarding competition set
forth in Item 1A of this report.
As of February 15, 2008, we had 927 employees. All but
76 of our employees were located in the U.S. None of our
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We
believe that relationships with our employees are satisfactory.
Regulation
For a discussion of the significant governmental regulations to
which our business is subject, please see the information set
forth under the caption Regulation in Item 7 of
this report.
Table of Contents
An investment in our securities involves risks. You should
carefully consider, in addition to the other information
contained in this report, the risks described below.
Oil and gas prices fluctuate widely, and lower prices for
an extended period of time are likely to have a material adverse
impact on our business. Our revenues,
profitability and future growth depend substantially on
prevailing prices for oil and gas. These prices also affect the
amount of cash flow available for capital expenditures and our
ability to borrow and raise additional capital. The amount that
we can borrow under our credit facility could be limited by
changing expectations of future prices. In addition, lower
prices may reduce the amount of oil and gas that we can
economically produce.
Among the factors that can cause fluctuations are:
To maintain and grow our production and cash flow, we must
continue to develop existing reserves and locate or acquire new
oil and gas reserves. We accomplish this
through successful drilling programs and the acquisition of
properties. However, we may be unable to find, develop or
acquire additional reserves or production at an acceptable cost.
In addition, these activities require substantial capital
expenditures. Our 2008 capital budget exceeds currently expected
cash flow from operations and cash and short-term investments on
hand at year end 2007 by approximately $260 million. In the
past, we often have increased our capital budget during the year
as a result of acquisitions or successful drilling. We
anticipate that the shortfall will be made up with cash and
short-term investments on hand and borrowings under our credit
arrangements. Lower oil and gas prices or unexpected operating
constraints or production difficulties will decrease cash flow
from operations and could limit our ability to borrow under our
credit arrangements. We also currently expect that our 2009
capital budget will exceed expected cash flow from operations.
Our ability to fund attractive acquisition opportunities and
future capital programs may be dependent on our ability to
access capital markets. Further or continued volatility in the
credit markets could adversely impact our ability to obtain
financing on acceptable terms. Because all of our credit
arrangements provide for variable interest rates, higher
interest rates would also reduce cash flow. For a detailed
discussion of our credit arrangements and liquidity, please see
Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 7 of
this report.
Our use of oil and gas price hedging contracts involves
credit risk and may limit future revenues from price
increases. We generally hedge a substantial,
but varying, portion of our anticipated future oil and natural
gas production for the next
12-24 months
as part of our risk management program. In addition, we may
utilize basis contracts to hedge the differential between the
NYMEX Henry Hub posted prices for natural gas and those of our
physical pricing points. In the case of acquisitions, we may
hedge acquired production for a longer period. We use hedging to
reduce price volatility, help ensure that we have adequate cash
flow to fund our capital programs and manage price risks and
returns on some of our acquisitions and drilling programs. While
the use of hedging transactions limits the downside risk of
price declines, their use also may limit future revenues from
price increases. Hedging transactions also involve the risk that
the counterparty may be unable to satisfy its obligations.
Actual quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves and
future cash flows from those reserves most likely will vary from
our estimates. Estimating accumulations of
oil and gas is complex. The process relies
Table of Contents
on interpretations of available geologic, geophysic, engineering
and production data. The extent, quality and reliability of this
data can vary. The process also requires a number of economic
assumptions, such as oil and gas prices, drilling and operating
expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds.
The accuracy of a reserve estimate is a function of:
The proved reserve information set forth in this report is based
on estimates we prepared. Estimates prepared by others might
differ materially from our estimates.
Actual quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves, future
production, oil and gas prices, revenues, taxes, development
expenditures and operating expenses most likely will vary from
our estimates. Any significant variance could materially affect
the quantities and net present value of our reserves. In
addition, we may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect
production history, results of exploration and development
activities and prevailing oil and gas prices. Our reserves also
may be susceptible to drainage by operators on adjacent
properties.
You should not assume that the present value of future net cash
flows is the current market value of our proved oil and gas
reserves. In accordance with SEC requirements, we base the
estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves
on prices and costs in effect at year-end. Actual future prices
and costs may be materially higher or lower than the prices and
costs we used. In addition, actual production rates for future
periods may vary significantly from the rates assumed in the
calculation.
If oil and gas prices decrease, we may be required to take
writedowns. We may be required to writedown
the net capitalized costs of our oil and gas properties when oil
and gas prices decrease or if we have substantial downward
adjustments to our estimated proved reserves, increases in our
estimates of operating or development costs or deterioration in
our exploitation results.
We capitalize the costs to acquire, find and develop our oil and
gas properties under the full cost accounting method. The net
capitalized costs of our oil and gas properties may not exceed
the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved
reserves, using period-end oil and gas prices and a 10% discount
factor, plus the lower of cost or fair market value for unproved
properties. If net capitalized costs of our oil and gas
properties exceed this limit, we must charge the amount of the
excess to earnings. We review the net capitalized costs of our
properties quarterly, based on prices in effect (excluding the
effect of our hedging contracts that are not designated for
hedge accounting) as of the end of each quarter or as of the
time of reporting our results. The net capitalized costs of oil
and gas properties is computed on a
country-by-country
basis. Therefore, while our properties in one country may be
subject to a writedown, our properties in other countries could
be unaffected. Once recorded, a writedown of oil and gas
properties is not reversible at a later date even if oil and gas
prices increase.
Production growth at Monument Butte may be limited by the
demand for our crude oil production. The
crude oil produced in the Uinta Basin is known as black
wax because it has a higher paraffin content than crude
oil found in most other major North American basins. Due to its
waxy composition, the oil is transported by truck to refiners in
the Salt Lake City area. These refiners have limited capacity to
refine this type of crude. We currently have agreements in place
with four area refiners that secure base load capacity of
approximately 14,000 BOPD through 2008 and 12,500 BOPD through
2009. We are working with the refiners to secure additional
capacity to allow for continued production growth. Without
additional refining capacity, our ability to increase production
from the field may be limited.
Table of Contents
Competition for experienced technical personnel may
negatively impact our operations or financial
results. Our continued drilling success and
the success of other activities integral to our operations will
depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain
experienced explorationists, engineers and other professionals.
Competition for these professionals is extremely intense. We are
likely to continue to experience increased costs to attract and
retain these professionals.
Competition for available oil and gas properties is
extremely intense. Our competitors include
major oil and gas companies, independent oil and gas companies
and financial buyers. Some of our competitors may have greater
and more diverse resources than we do. Recently, higher
commodity prices and stiff competition for acquisitions have
significantly increased the cost of available properties.
We may be unable to obtain the drilling rigs or support
services necessary for our offshore drilling and development
programs in a timely manner or at acceptable
rates. In periods of increased drilling
activity resulting from high commodity prices, demand exceeds
availability for offshore drilling rigs, drilling vessels, dive
boats, supply boats and experienced personnel. The market for
oilfield services is currently very competitive. This may lead
to difficulty and delays in consistently obtaining services and
equipment from vendors, obtaining drilling rigs and other
equipment at acceptable rates, and scheduling equipment
fabrication at factories and fabrication yards. This, in turn,
may lead to projects being delayed or increased costs.
We may be subject to risks in connection with
acquisitions. The successful acquisition of
producing properties requires an assessment of several factors,
including:
The accuracy of these assessments is inherently uncertain. In
connection with these assessments, we perform a review of the
subject properties that we believe to be generally consistent
with industry practices. Our review will not reveal all existing
or potential problems nor will it permit us to become
sufficiently familiar with the properties to fully assess their
deficiencies and capabilities. Inspections will not likely be
performed on every well or facility, and structural and
environmental problems are not necessarily observable even when
an inspection is undertaken. Even when problems are identified,
the seller may be unwilling or unable to provide effective
contractual protection against all or part of the problems.
Drilling is a high-risk activity. In
addition to the numerous operating risks described in more
detail below, the drilling of wells involves the risk that no
commercially productive oil or gas reservoirs will be
encountered. In addition, we often are uncertain as to the
future cost or timing of drilling, completing and producing
wells. Furthermore, our drilling operations may be curtailed,
delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors,
including:
Table of Contents
The oil and gas business involves many operating risks
that can cause substantial losses; insurance may not protect us
against all these risks. These risks include:
If any of these events occur, we could incur substantial losses
as a result of:
If we experience any of these problems, our ability to conduct
operations could be adversely affected.
Offshore operations are subject to a variety of operating risks,
such as capsizing, collisions and damage or loss from hurricanes
or other adverse weather conditions. These conditions can cause
substantial damage to facilities and interrupt production. Some
of our offshore operations are dependent upon the availability,
proximity and capacity of pipelines, natural gas gathering
systems and processing facilities. Necessary infrastructures may
be temporarily unavailable due to adverse weather conditions or
may not be available to us in the future.
We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these
potential risks and losses. We may elect not to obtain insurance
if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive
relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and
environmental risks generally are not insurable.
Exploration in deepwater may involve significant financial
risks. Much of the deepwater play lacks the
physical and oilfield service infrastructure necessary for
production. As a result, development of a deepwater discovery
may be a lengthy process and require substantial capital
investment. Because of their size, we may not serve as the
operator of significant projects in which we invest. As a
result, we may have limited ability to exercise influence over
operations related to these projects or their associated costs.
Our dependence on the operator and other working interest owners
for these deepwater projects and our limited ability to
influence operations and associated costs could prevent the
realization of our targeted returns on capital. In addition,
there is limited availability of suitable offshore drilling
rigs, drilling equipment, support vessels, production and
transportation infrastructure and qualified operating personnel.
We are subject to complex laws that can affect the cost,
manner or feasibility of doing
business. Exploration and development and the
production and sale of oil and gas are subject to extensive
federal, state,
Table of Contents
local and international regulation. We may be required to make
large expenditures to comply with environmental and other
governmental regulations. Matters subject to regulation include:
Under these laws, we could be liable for personal injuries,
property damage, oil spills, discharge of hazardous materials,
remediation and
clean-up
costs, natural resource damages and other environmental damages.
We also could be required to install expensive pollution control
measures or limit or cease activities on lands located within
wilderness, wetlands or other environmentally or politically
sensitive areas. Failure to comply with these laws also may
result in the suspension or termination of our operations and
subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties as
well as the imposition of corrective action orders. Moreover,
these laws could change in ways that substantially increase our
costs. Any such liabilities, penalties, suspensions,
terminations or regulatory changes could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
We have risks associated with our foreign
operations. Ownership of property interests
and production operations in areas outside the United States is
subject to the various risks inherent in foreign operations.
These risks may include:
Our international operations also may be adversely affected by
the laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign
trade, taxation and investment. In addition, if a dispute arises
with respect to our foreign operations, we may be subject to the
exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be
successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of
the courts of the United States.
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, stockholder
rights plan and some of our arrangements with employees contain
provisions that could discourage an acquisition or change of
control of our company. Our stockholder
rights plan, together with certain provisions of our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws, may make it more difficult to
effect a change of control of our company, to acquire us or to
replace incumbent management. In addition, our change of control
severance plan and agreements, our omnibus stock plans and our
incentive compensation plan contain provisions that provide for
severance payments and accelerated vesting of benefits,
including accelerated vesting of restricted stock, restricted
stock units and stock options, upon a change of control. These
provisions could discourage or prevent a change of control or
reduce the price our stockholders receive in an acquisition of
our company.
None.
Table of Contents
The information appearing in Item 1 of this Annual Report
is incorporated herein by reference.
At year end-2007, 96% of our proved reserves were located in the
U.S. and 92% were located onshore. Our 10 largest fields or
plays accounted for approximately 77% of our proved reserves at
year-end 2007. The largest of those, the Woodford Shale play and
the Monument Butte field accounted for about 43% of our proved
reserves and around 36% of the net present value of our proved
reserves at December 31, 2007.
The following table shows our estimated net proved oil and gas
reserves and the present value of estimated future after-tax net
cash flows related to those reserves as of December 31,
2007.
All reserve information in this report is based on estimates
prepared by our petroleum engineering staff. Actual quantities
of recoverable reserves and future cash flows from those
reserves most likely will vary from the estimates set forth
above. Reserve and cash flow estimates rely on interpretations
of data and require many assumptions that may turn out to be
inaccurate. For a discussion of these interpretations and
assumptions, see Actual quantities of recoverable oil
and gas reserves and future cash flows from those reserves most
likely will vary from our estimates under Item 1A
of this report.
Table of Contents
Drilling
Activity
The following table sets forth our drilling activity for each
year (other than drilling activity related to our discontinued
operations in the United Kingdom) in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007.
We were in the process of drilling 61 gross (36.5 net)
exploratory wells (includes 58 gross (35.2 net)
exploitation wells) and eight gross (3.7 net) development wells
in the United States and one gross (1.0 net) exploratory well in
China at December 31, 2007.
Table of Contents
Productive
Wells
The following table sets forth the number of productive oil and
gas wells in which we owned an interest as of December 31,
2007 and the location of, and other information with respect to,
those wells.
The
day-to-day
operations of oil and gas properties are the responsibility of
an operator designated under pooling or operating agreements or
production sharing contracts. The operator supervises
production, maintains production records, employs or contracts
for field personnel and performs other functions. Generally, an
operator receives reimbursement for direct expenses incurred in
the performance of its duties as well as
Table of Contents
monthly per-well producing and drilling overhead reimbursement
at rates customarily charged by unaffiliated third parties. The
charges customarily vary with the depth and location of the well
being operated.
Acreage
Data
As of December 31, 2007, we owned interests in developed
and undeveloped oil and gas acreage in the locations set forth
in the table below. Domestic ownership interests generally take
the form of working interests in oil and gas leases
that have varying terms. International ownership interests
generally arise from participation in production sharing
contracts.
Table of Contents
The table below summarizes by year and geographic area our
undeveloped acreage scheduled to expire in the next five years.
In most cases, the drilling of a commercial well, or the filing
and approval of a development plan or suspension of operations,
will hold acreage beyond the expiration date. We own fee mineral
interests in 359,005 gross (101,925 net) undeveloped acres.
These interests do not expire.
Title to
Properties
We believe that we have satisfactory title to all of our
producing properties in accordance with generally accepted
industry standards. As is customary in the industry in the case
of undeveloped properties, often little investigation of record
title is made at the time of acquisition. Investigations are
made prior to the consummation of an acquisition of producing
properties and before commencement of drilling operations on
undeveloped properties.
In December 2002, a lawsuit against our Mid-Continent subsidiary
was filed in Beaver County, Oklahoma and was later certified as
a class action royalty owner lawsuit. The complaint alleged that
we improperly reduced royalty payments for certain expenses and
charges, and also claimed breach of contract and breach of
fiduciary duties, among other claims. In April 2007, we entered
into a settlement agreement that has since received court
approval.
We also have been named as a defendant in a number of other
lawsuits that arose in the ordinary course of our business.
While the outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with
certainty, we do not expect these matters to have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, cash flows or results
of operations.
Table of Contents
There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security
holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.
The following table sets forth the names and ages (as of
February 29, 2008) of and positions held by our
executive officers. Our executive officers serve at the
discretion of our Board of Directors.
The executive officers have held the positions indicated above
for the past five years, except as follows:
David A. Trice reassumed the role of President in
October 2007. He was appointed Chairman in September 2004.
Lee K. Boothby was promoted to his present
position in October 2007. He managed our Mid-Continent
operations from February 2002 to October 2007, and was promoted
from General Manager to Vice President in November 2004.
Terry W. Rathert was promoted from Vice President
to Senior Vice President in November 2004.
Michael D. Van Horn joined our company as Senior
Vice President in November 2006. He served at EOG Resources, and
its predecessor Enron Oil and Gas, from 1993 to November 2006.
Most recently, he served as Vice President of International
Exploration. Prior to that position, he was Director of
Exploration.
Mona Leigh Bernhardt was promoted from Manager to
Vice President in December 2005.
W. Mark Blumenshine was promoted from Manager
to Vice President in December 2005.
Stephen C. Campbell was promoted from Manager to
Vice President in December 2005.
George T. Dunn was named Vice
President Mid-Continent in October 2007. He managed
our onshore Gulf Coast operations from 2001 to October 2007, and
was promoted from General Manager to Vice President in November
2004.
Table of Contents
John H. Jasek was named Vice President
Gulf Coast in October 2007 and became the manager of our onshore
Gulf Coast operations. He has managed our Gulf of Mexico
operations since March 2005, and was promoted from General
Manager to Vice President in November 2006. Prior to March 2005,
he was a Petroleum Engineer in the Western Gulf of Mexico.
James J. Metcalf was promoted from Manager to Vice
President in December 2005.
Gary D. Packer was promoted from a Gulf of Mexico
General Manager to Vice President Rocky Mountains in
November 2004.
Mark J. Spicer was promoted from Manager to Vice
President in December 2005.
James T. Zernell was promoted from Manager to Vice
President in December 2005.
John D. Marziotti was promoted to General Counsel
in August 2007. From November 2003, when he joined our company,
until August 2007 he held the position of Legal Counsel. Prior
to joining us, he was a shareholder of the law firm of
Strasburger & Price, LLP.
Table of Contents
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol NFX. The following table sets forth, for
each of the periods indicated, the high and low reported sales
price of our common stock on the NYSE.
On February 25, 2008, the last reported sales price of our
common stock on the NYSE was $53.20 per share. As of that date,
there were approximately 1,885 holders of record of our common
stock.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do
not intend to do so in the foreseeable future. We intend to
retain earnings for the future operation and development of our
business. Any future cash dividends to holders of our common
stock would depend on future earnings, capital requirements, our
financial condition and other factors determined by our Board of
Directors. The covenants contained in our credit facility and in
the indentures governing our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014 and 2016 could restrict our ability
to pay cash dividends.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended
December 31, 2007.
Table of Contents
The performance presentation shown below is being furnished
pursuant to applicable rules of the SEC. As required by these
rules, the performance graph was prepared based upon the
following assumptions:
Our peer group is comprised of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation,
Apache Corporation, Bill Barrett Corporation, Cabot
Oil & Gas Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation,
EOG Resources, Inc., Forest Oil Corporation, Murphy Oil
Corporation, Noble Energy, Inc., Pioneer Natural Resources
Company, Range Resources Corporation, St. Mary
Land & Exploration Company, Stone Energy Corporation,
Swift Energy Company and XTO Energy Inc.
Table of Contents
SELECTED
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL AND RESERVE DATA
The following table shows selected consolidated financial data
derived from our consolidated financial statements and selected
reserve data derived from our supplementary oil and gas
disclosures set forth in Item 8 of this report. The data
should be read in conjunction with Item 2,
Properties Proved Reserves and Future
Net Cash Flows and Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, of this report.
Table of Contents
We are an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
exploration, development and acquisition of natural gas and
crude oil properties. Our domestic areas of operation include
the Anadarko and Arkoma Basins of the Mid-Continent, the Rocky
Mountains, onshore Texas and the Gulf of Mexico.
Internationally, we are active in Malaysia and China.
Our revenues, profitability and future growth depend
substantially on prevailing prices for oil and gas and on our
ability to find, develop and acquire oil and gas reserves that
are economically recoverable. The preparation of our financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect our reported results of operations and the amount of our
reported assets, liabilities and proved oil and gas reserves. We
use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas
activities.
Oil and Gas Prices. Prices for oil and
gas fluctuate widely. Oil and gas prices affect:
As part of our risk management program, we generally hedge a
substantial, but varying, portion of our anticipated future oil
and gas production. Reducing our exposure to price volatility
helps ensure that we have adequate funds available for our
capital programs and helps us manage returns on some of our
acquisitions and drilling programs.
Reserve Replacement. To maintain and
grow our production and cash flow, we must continue to develop
existing reserves and locate or acquire new oil and gas reserves
to replace those being depleted by production. Substantial
capital expenditures are required to find, develop and acquire
oil and gas reserves.
Significant Estimates. We believe the
most difficult, subjective or complex judgments and estimates we
must make in connection with the preparation of our financial
statements are:
Accounting for Hedging
Activities. Beginning October 1, 2005,
we elected not to designate any future price risk management
activities as accounting hedges. Because hedges not designated
for hedge accounting are accounted for on a
mark-to-market
basis, we are likely to experience significant non-cash
volatility in our reported earnings during periods of commodity
price volatility. Please see Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Commodity
Derivative Activities.
Table of Contents
Results
of Operations
Significant Transactions. We completed
several significant transactions during 2007 that affect the
comparability of our results from period to period and that had
a meaningful impact on our 2007 results of operations and cash
flows.
Please see Note 3, Discontinued Operations, and
Note 4, Oil and Gas Assets, to our consolidated
financial statements appearing later in this report for a
discussion regarding these transactions.
Revenues. All of our revenues are
derived from the sale of our oil and gas production. The effects
of the settlement of hedges designated for hedge accounting are
included in revenues, but those not so designated have no effect
on our reported revenues. None of our outstanding hedges are
designated for hedge accounting. Please see Note 5,
Commodity Derivative Instruments, to our
consolidated financial statements appearing later in this report
for a discussion of the accounting applicable to our oil and gas
derivative contracts.
Our revenues may vary significantly from period to period as a
result of changes in commodity prices or volumes of production
sold. In addition, crude oil from our operations offshore
Malaysia and China is produced into FPSOs and lifted
and sold periodically as barge quantities are accumulated.
Revenues are recorded when oil is lifted and sold, not when it
is produced into the FPSO. As a result, the timing of liftings
may impact period to period results.
Revenues of $1.8 billion for 2007 were 7% higher than 2006
revenues due to higher oil production and higher oil prices
partially offset by lower gas production and lower gas prices.
Revenues of $1.7 billion for 2006 were 5% lower than 2005
revenues due to lower gas prices and oil production partially
offset by higher oil prices and increased gas production.
Table of Contents
Domestic Production. Our 2007 domestic
gas and oil production (stated on a natural gas equivalent
basis) decreased 2% from 2006. Our 2007 natural gas production
decreased 3% primarily as a result of the sale of our shallow
water Gulf of Mexico assets in August 2007. This decrease was
partially offset by an increase in production in the
Mid-Continent as a result of successful drilling efforts and in
the Rocky Mountains as a result of our acquisition there in June
2007. Our 2006 Gulf of Mexico production was negatively impacted
(16 Bcfe) by production deferrals related to Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita in 2005. Our domestic oil and condensate
production increased 5% over 2006 primarily due to increased
sales from our Monument Butte field.
Our 2006 domestic gas and oil production (stated on a natural
gas equivalent basis) increased slightly over 2005. Our 2006
domestic natural gas production increased 4% over 2005 primarily
as the result of
26
Table of Contents
successful drilling efforts in the Mid-Continent partially
offset by continued Gulf of Mexico production deferrals during
the first half of 2006 related to the 2005 storms and natural
declines in production from some fields. Our 2006 domestic oil
and condensate production decreased 13% over 2005. The decrease
was primarily the result of continued Gulf of Mexico production
deferrals during the first half of 2006 related to the 2005
storms and natural declines in production from some fields.
International Production. Our 2007
international oil and gas production (stated on a natural gas
equivalent basis) increased 106% from 2006 primarily due to the
commencement of liftings in China in August 2006 and from our
Abu field in Malaysia in July 2007 and the timing of liftings in
Malaysia and China. Our 2006 international oil and gas
production decreased 15% from 2005 due to the timing of liftings
of oil production in Malaysia.
Operating Expenses. We believe the most
informative way to analyze changes in our operating expenses
from period to period is on a
unit-of-production,
or per Mcfe, basis.
Year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to December 31,
2006
The following table presents information about our operating
expenses for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2007.
Table of Contents
Domestic Operations. Our total domestic
operating expenses for 2007, stated on an Mcfe basis, increased
14% over 2006. The period to period change was primarily related
to the following items:
International Operations. Our
international operating expenses for 2007, stated on an Mcfe
basis, increased 5% compared to 2006. The period to period
change was primarily related to the following items:
Table of Contents
Year
ended December 31, 2006 compared to December 31,
2005
The following table presents information about our operating
expenses for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2006.
Domestic Operations. Our domestic
operating expenses for 2006, stated on an Mcfe basis, increased
24% over 2005. The period to period change was primarily related
to the following items:
Table of Contents
International Operations. Our
international operating expenses for 2006, stated on an Mcfe
basis, increased 37% over 2005. The increase was primarily
related to the following items:
Interest Expense. The following table
presents information about our interest expense for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.
The increase in gross interest expense in 2007 resulted
primarily from higher average debt levels outstanding under our
credit arrangements as compared to 2006. Prior to the sale of
our shallow water Gulf of Mexico assets, we financed our capital
shortfall and the acquisition of Stone Energys Rocky
Mountain assets with cash on hand and borrowings under our
credit arrangements. Following the sale, we repaid all of our
Table of Contents
outstanding borrowings under our credit arrangements and
$125 million principal amount of our 7.45% Senior
Notes that became due in October 2007.
The increase in gross interest expense in 2006 resulted
primarily from the April 13, 2006 issuance of
$550 million principal amount of our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016, partially offset by the May 3,
2006 redemption of $250 million principal amount of our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012.
Commodity Derivative Income
(Expense). The following table presents
information about the components of commodity derivative income
(expense) for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007.
Taxes. The effective tax rates for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were 41%, 36%
and 37%, respectively. Our effective tax rate was more than the
federal statutory tax rate for all three years primarily due to
state income taxes and the differences between international and
U.S. federal statutory rates. Our effective tax rate for
2007 increased because $26 million of interest income on
intercompany loans to our international subsidiaries was
included in the determination of U.S. federal income taxes.
However, the related intercompany interest expense was incurred
by several of our international subsidiaries that are located in
non-taxing international jurisdictions.
Estimates of future taxable income can be significantly affected
by changes in oil and natural gas prices, the timing and amount
of future production and future operating expenses and capital
costs.
We must find new and develop existing reserves to maintain and
grow production and cash flow. We accomplish this through
successful drilling programs and the acquisition of properties.
These activities require substantial capital expenditures. We
establish a capital budget at the beginning of each calendar
year. Our 2008 capital budget currently exceeds expected cash
flow from operations and cash and short-term investments on hand
at year end 2007 by approximately $260 million. We
anticipate that the shortfall will be made up with cash and
short-term investments on hand and borrowings under our credit
arrangements. In the past, we often have increased our capital
budget during the year as a result of acquisitions or successful
drilling. To the extent that we increase our capital budget
during 2008, we anticipate funding these amounts with borrowings
under our credit arrangements.
Table of Contents
Credit Arrangements. In June 2007, we
entered into a new revolving credit facility that matures in
June 2012 and provides for initial loan commitments of
$1.25 billion from a syndicate of financial institutions,
led by JPMorgan Chase as agent. The loan commitments may be
increased to a maximum of $1.65 billion if the existing
lenders increase their loan commitments or new financial
institutions are added to the facility. Subject to compliance
with covenants in our credit facility that restrict our ability
to incur additional debt, we also have a total of
$135 million of borrowing capacity under money market lines
of credit with various financial institutions. For a more
detailed description of the terms of our credit arrangements,
please see Note 8, Debt, to our consolidated
financial statements appearing later in this report.
At February 28, 2008, we had no borrowings outstanding
under our credit facility nor under our money market lines of
credit and we had approximately $1.4 billion of available
borrowing capacity under our credit arrangements.
Working Capital. Our working capital
balance fluctuates as a result of the timing and amount of
borrowings or repayments under our credit arrangements and
changes in the fair value of our outstanding commodity
derivative instruments. Without the effects of commodity
derivative instruments, we typically have a working capital
deficit or a relatively small amount of positive working capital
because our capital spending generally has exceeded our cash
flows from operations and we generally use excess cash to pay
down borrowings under our credit arrangements.
At December 31, 2007, we had a working capital deficit of
$2 million. Our current assets include $370 million of
cash and short-term investments remaining from the proceeds of
property sales. Our working capital position at
December 31, 2007 was positively affected by a reduction in
our asset retirement obligation of $30 million due to the
sale of our shallow water Gulf of Mexico assets. At
December 31, 2007, our working capital deficit included a
short-term net derivative liability of $84 million.
This compares to a working capital deficit of $272 million
at the end of 2006 and $129 million at the end of 2005. The
majority of the working capital deficit at December 31,
2006 relates to the reclassification of $125 million
principal amount of our 7.45% Senior Notes due
October 15, 2007 as a current liability and an increase in
accrued liabilities as a result of our significant capital
activities near the end of 2006. The increase in accrued
liabilities is due to our increased exploration and development
activity and higher service costs over 2005. Our 2006 working
capital deficit also includes $40 million in asset
retirement obligations compared to $47 million in 2005. Our
2006 working capital includes a short-term net derivative asset
of $200 million and our 2005 working capital includes a
short-term net derivative liability of $89 million.
Cash Flows from Operations. Cash flows
from operations (both continuing and discontinued) are primarily
affected by production and commodity prices, net of the effects
of settlements of our derivative contracts and changes in
working capital. We also have experienced fluctuations in
operating cash flows as a result of higher operating costs for
all of our operations and activities associated with the 2005
storms. In August 2006, we reached an agreement with our
insurance underwriters to settle all claims related to the 2005
storms (business interruption, property damage and control of
well/operators extra expense) for $235 million.
During 2007, we incurred $52 million of repair expenditures
in excess of the insurance benefits received as compared to
$17 million of uninsured repairs during 2006. These amounts
are reflected as a use of operating cash flows in the respective
year.
We sell substantially all of our natural gas and oil production
under floating market contracts. However, we generally hedge a
substantial, but varying, portion of our anticipated future oil
and natural gas production for the next
12-24 months.
See Oil and Gas Hedging below. We
typically receive the cash associated with accrued oil and gas
sales within
45-60 days
of production. As a result, cash flows from operations and
income from operations generally correlate, but cash flows from
operations is impacted by changes in working capital and is not
affected by DD&A, writedowns or other non-cash charges or
credits.
Our net cash flow from operations was $1.2 billion in 2007,
a decrease of 17% compared to net cash flow from operations of
$1.4 billion in 2006. Although our 2007 production volumes
were impacted by our property sales, higher commodity prices
offset the cash flow impact of the property sales. Realized oil
and gas prices (on a natural gas equivalent basis), including
the effects of hedging contracts (regardless of whether
Table of Contents
designated for hedge accounting), increased 7% over 2006. Our
working capital requirements during 2007 increased compared to
2006 as a result of increased drilling activities, the timing of
payments made by us to vendors and other operators, and the
timing and amount of advances received from our joint operators.
Our net cash flow from operations was $1.4 billion in 2006,
a 25% increase over the prior year. The increase was primarily
due to 2006 realized oil and gas prices (on a natural gas
equivalent basis), including the effects of hedging contracts
(regardless of whether designated for hedge accounting), which
increased 9% over 2005. See Results of
Operations above.
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities. Net cash used in investing
activities (both continuing and discontinued) for 2007 was
$906 million compared to $1.7 billion for 2006.
During 2007, we:
During 2006, we:
Capital Expenditures. Our capital
spending of $2.6 billion for 2007 increased 51% from our
$1.7 billion of capital spending during 2006. These amounts
exclude recorded asset retirement obligations of
$21 million in 2007 and $11 million in 2006. Of the
$2.6 billion spent in 2007, we invested $1.4 billion
in domestic exploitation and development, $240 million in
domestic exploration (exclusive of exploitation and leasehold
activity), $736 million in acquisitions and domestic
leasehold activity (including $578 million for the Rocky
Mountain asset acquisition) and $236 million
internationally.
Our 2006 capital spending of $1.7 billion increased 61%
from our 2005 capital spending of $1.1 billion. These
amounts exclude recorded asset retirement obligations of
$11 million in 2006 and $44 million in 2005. During
2006, we invested $1.2 billion in domestic exploitation and
development, $379 million in domestic exploration
(exclusive of exploitation and leasehold activity),
$71 million in other domestic leasehold activity and
$133 million internationally.
We budgeted $1.6 billion for capital spending in 2008,
excluding acquisitions and $113 million of estimated
capitalized interest and overhead. Approximately 40% of the
$1.6 billion is allocated to the Mid-Continent, 20% to the
Rocky Mountains, 15% to the onshore Gulf Coast, 15% to the Gulf
of Mexico and 10% to international projects. See Item 1,
Business Our Properties and Plans for
2008. Since our 2008 capital budget currently exceeds
forecasted net cash flow from operations, we plan to make up the
shortfall with cash and short-term investments on hand and
borrowings under our credit arrangements. Actual levels of
capital expenditures may vary significantly due to many factors,
including the extent to which properties are acquired, drilling
results, oil and gas prices, industry conditions and the prices
and availability of goods and services. We continue to pursue
attractive acquisition opportunities; however, the timing and
size of acquisitions are unpredictable. Depending on the timing
of an acquisition, we may spend additional capital during the
year of the acquisition for drilling and development activities
on the acquired properties.
Table of Contents
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities. Net cash flow used in financing
activities (both continuing and discontinued) for 2007 was
$79 million compared to $317 million of net cash flow
provided by financing activities for 2006.
During 2007, we:
During 2006, we:
Contractual
Obligations
The table below summarizes our significant contractual
obligations by maturity as of December 31, 2007.
Table of Contents
Credit Arrangements. Please see
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Credit Arrangements above for a description of our
revolving credit facility and money market lines of credit.
Senior Notes. In February 2001, we
issued $175 million aggregate principal amount of our
75/8% Senior
Notes due 2011. Interest on our senior notes is payable
semi-annually. The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated
obligations and rank equally with all of our other existing and
future unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. We may redeem
some or all of our senior notes at any time before their
maturity at a redemption price based on a make-whole amount plus
accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The
indenture governing our senior notes contains covenants that may
limit our ability to, among other things:
The indenture also provides that if any of our subsidiaries
guarantee any of our indebtedness at any time in the future,
then we will cause our senior notes to be equally and ratably
guaranteed by that subsidiary.
During the third quarter of 2003, we entered into interest rate
swap agreements that provide for us to pay variable and receive
fixed interest payments and are designated as fair value hedges
of a portion of our senior notes (see Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk and Note 8, Debt
Interest Rate Swaps, to our consolidated financial
statements).
Senior Subordinated Notes. In August
2004, we issued $325 million aggregate principal amount of
our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014. In April 2006, we issued
$550 million aggregate principal amount of our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016. Interest on our senior subordinated
notes is payable semi-annually. The notes are unsecured senior
subordinated obligations that rank junior in right of payment to
all of our present and future senior indebtedness.
We may redeem some or all of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 at any time on or after September 1, 2009 and some
or all of our
65/8% notes
due 2016 at any time on or after April 15, 2011, in each
case, at a redemption price stated in the applicable indenture
governing the notes. We also may redeem all but not part of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 prior to September 1, 2009 and all but not part of
our
65/8% notes
due 2016 prior to April 15, 2011, in each case, at a
redemption price based on a make-whole amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, before
April 15, 2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the original
principal amount of our
65/8% notes
due 2016 with net cash proceeds from certain sales of our common
stock at 106.625% of the principal amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
The indenture governing our senior subordinated notes may limit
our ability to, among other things:
Table of Contents
Commitments under Joint Operating
Agreements. Most of our properties are
operated through joint ventures under joint operating or similar
agreements. Typically, the operator under a joint operating
agreement enters into contracts, such as drilling contracts, for
the benefit of all joint venture partners. Through the joint
operating agreement, the non-operators reimburse, and in some
cases advance, the funds necessary to meet the contractual
obligations entered into by the operator. These obligations are
typically shared on a working interest basis. The
joint operating agreement provides remedies to the operator if a
non-operator does not satisfy its share of the contractual
obligations. Occasionally, the operator is permitted by the
joint operating agreement to enter into lease obligations and
other contractual commitments that are then passed on to the
non-operating joint interest owners as lease operating expenses,
frequently without any identification as to the long-term nature
of any commitments underlying such expenses.
As part of our risk management program, we generally hedge a
substantial, but varying, portion of our anticipated future oil
and natural gas production for the next
12-24 months
to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in natural gas and oil
prices. In the case of acquisitions, we may hedge acquired
production for a longer period. In addition, we may utilize
basis contracts to hedge the differential between the NYMEX
Henry Hub posted prices and those of our physical pricing
points. Reducing our exposure to price volatility helps ensure
that we have adequate funds available for our capital programs
and helps us manage returns on some of our acquisitions and
drilling programs. Our decision on the quantity and price at
which we choose to hedge our future production is based in part
on our view of current and future market conditions.
Approximately 87% of our 2007 production was subject to
derivative contracts (including basis contracts). In 2006, 57%
of our production was subject to derivative contracts, compared
to 81% in 2005.
While the use of these hedging arrangements limits the downside
risk of adverse price movements, their use also may limit future
revenues from favorable price movements. In addition, the use of
hedging transactions may involve basis risk. Substantially all
of our hedging transactions are settled based upon reported
settlement prices on the NYMEX. Historically, a majority of our
hedged natural gas and crude oil production has been sold at
market prices that have had a high positive correlation to the
settlement price for such hedges. With the sale of the Gulf of
Mexico shelf production and the corresponding shift in the
geographic distribution of our natural gas production, we have
begun to utilize basis hedges to a greater extent.
The price that we receive for natural gas production from the
Gulf of Mexico and onshore Gulf Coast, after basis
differentials, transportation and handling charges, typically
averages $0.40-$0.60 less per MMBtu than the Henry Hub Index.
Realized gas prices for our Mid-Continent properties, after
basis differentials, transportation and handling charges,
typically average
75-85% of
the Henry Hub Index. In light of potential basis risk with
respect to our newly acquired Rocky Mountain assets, we have
hedged the basis differential for about 50% of our estimated
production from proved producing fields acquired from Stone
Energy through 2012 to lock in the differential at a weighted
average of $1.18 per MMBtu less than the Henry Hub Index. The
price we receive for our Gulf Coast oil production typically
averages about $2 per barrel below the NYMEX West Texas
Intermediate (WTI) price. The price we receive for our oil
production in the Rocky Mountains is currently averaging about
$13-$15 per barrel below the WTI price. Oil production from the
Mid-Continent typically sells at a $1.00-$1.50 per barrel
discount to WTI. Oil sales from our operations in Malaysia
typically sell at Tapis, which generally is consistent with WTI.
Oil sales from our operations in China typically sell at $10-$12
per barrel less than WTI.
The use of hedging transactions also involves the risk that the
counterparties will be unable to meet the financial terms of
such transactions. At December 31, 2007, Barclays Capital,
JPMorgan Chase, Citibank N.A., J Aron & Company,
Bank of Montreal and Credit Suisse were the counterparties with
respect to 84% of our future hedged production.
Between January 1, 2008 and February 25, 2008, we
entered into the additional derivative contracts set forth
below. None of these contracts have been designated for hedge
accounting.
Table of Contents
Natural
Gas
In addition, in February 2008 we paid $14.6 million to
unwind and rehedge 360 MBbls of our oil contracts for
January 2010 through December 2010. The three-way
collar contracts that we unwound had weighted average prices of
$32.00 and $50.88 per barrel for the floor and ceiling prices,
respectively. These contracts had an additional put with a
weighted average price of $25.00 per barrel. We rehedged these
barrels for this period with a weighted average swap price of
$93.40 per barrel.
Please see the discussion and tables in Note 5,
Commodity Derivative Instruments, to our
consolidated financial statements appearing later in this report
for a description of the accounting applicable to our hedging
program and a listing of open contracts as of December 31,
2007 and the estimated fair market value of those contracts as
of that date.
We do not currently utilize any off-balance sheet arrangements
with unconsolidated entities to enhance liquidity and capital
resource positions, or for any other purpose. However, as is
customary in the oil and gas industry, we have various
contractual work commitments as described above under
Contractual Obligations.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect our reported results of
operations and the amount of reported assets, liabilities and
proved oil and gas reserves. Some accounting policies involve
judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is
reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could
have been reported under different conditions, or if different
assumptions had been used. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on
historical experience and various other assumptions that we
believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates and assumptions used in preparation of our financial
statements. Described below are the most significant policies we
apply in preparing our financial statements, some of which are
subject to alternative treatments under generally accepted
accounting principles. We also describe the most significant
estimates and assumptions we make in applying these policies. We
discussed the development, selection and disclosure of each of
these with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. See
Results of Operations above and
Note 1, Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting
Table of Contents
Policies, to our consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of additional accounting policies and estimates we
make.
For discussion purposes, we have divided our significant
policies into four categories. Set forth below is an overview of
each of our significant accounting policies by category.
quantity of our proved oil and gas reserves;
costs withheld from amortization; and
future costs to develop and abandon our oil and gas
properties.
Oil and Gas Activities. Accounting for
oil and gas activities is subject to special, unique rules. Two
generally accepted methods of accounting for oil and gas
activities are available successful efforts and full
cost. The most significant differences between these two methods
are the treatment of exploration costs and the manner in which
the carrying value of oil and gas properties are amortized and
evaluated for impairment. The successful efforts method requires
unsuccessful exploration costs to be expensed, while the full
cost method provides for the capitalization of these costs. Both
methods generally provide for the periodic amortization of
capitalized costs based on proved reserve quantities. Impairment
of oil and gas properties under the successful efforts method is
based on an evaluation of the carrying value of individual oil
and gas properties against their estimated fair value, while
impairment under the full cost method requires an evaluation of
the carrying value of oil and gas properties included in a cost
center against the net present value of future cash flows from
the related proved reserves, using period-end prices and costs
and a 10% discount rate.
Full Cost Method. We use the full cost method
of accounting for our oil and gas activities. Under this method,
all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and
development of oil and gas properties are capitalized into cost
centers (the amortization base) that are established on a
country-by-country
basis. Such amounts include the cost of drilling and equipping
productive wells, dry hole costs, lease acquisition costs and
delay rentals. Capitalized costs also include salaries, employee
benefits, costs of consulting services and other expenses that
are estimated to directly relate to our oil and gas activities.
Interest costs related to unproved properties also are
capitalized. Although some of these costs will ultimately result
in no additional reserves, we expect the benefits of successful
wells to more than offset the costs of any unsuccessful ones.
Costs associated with production and general corporate
activities are expensed in the period incurred. The capitalized
costs of our oil and gas properties, plus an estimate of our
future development costs, are amortized on a
unit-of-production
method based on our estimate of total proved reserves.
Amortization is calculated separately on a
country-by-country
basis. Our financial position and results of operations would
have been significantly different had we used the successful
efforts method of accounting for our oil and gas activities.
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves. Our engineering
estimates of proved oil and gas reserves directly impact
financial accounting estimates, including depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense and the full cost ceiling
limitation. Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated
quantities of natural gas and crude oil reserves that geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under
period-end economic and operating conditions. The process of
estimating quantities of proved reserves is very complex,
requiring significant subjective decisions in the evaluation of
all geological, engineering and economic data for each
reservoir. The data for a given reservoir may change
Table of Contents
substantially over time as a result of numerous factors
including additional development activity, evolving production
history and continual reassessment of the viability of
production under varying economic conditions. Changes in oil and
gas prices, operating costs and expected performance from a
given reservoir also will result in future revisions to the
amount of our estimated proved reserves. All reserve information
in this report is based on estimates prepared by our petroleum
engineering staff.
Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization. Estimated proved oil and gas
reserves are a significant component of our calculation of
DD&A expense and revisions in such estimates may alter the
rate of future expense. Holding all other factors constant, if
reserves are revised upward, earnings would increase due to
lower depletion expense. Likewise, if reserves are revised
downward, earnings would decrease due to higher depletion
expense or due to a ceiling test writedown. To increase our
domestic DD&A rate by $0.01 per Mcfe for 2007 would have
required a decrease in our estimated proved reserves at
December 31, 2006 of approximately 13 Bcfe. Due to the
relatively small size of our international full cost pools for
Malaysia and China, any decrease in reserves associated with the
respective countrys full cost pool would significantly
increase the DD&A rate in that country. However, since
production from our international operations represented only
about 6% of our consolidated production for 2007, a change in
our international DD&A expense would not have materially
affected our consolidated results of operations.
Full Cost Ceiling Limitation. Under the full
cost method, we are subject to quarterly calculations of a
ceiling or limitation on the amount of costs
associated with our oil and gas properties that can be
capitalized on our balance sheet. If net capitalized costs
exceed the applicable cost center ceiling, we are subject to a
ceiling test writedown to the extent of such excess. If
required, it would reduce earnings and stockholders equity
in the period of occurrence and result in lower DD&A
expense in future periods. The ceiling limitation is applied
separately for each country in which we have oil and gas
properties. The discounted present value of our proved reserves
is a major component of the ceiling calculation and represents
the component that requires the most subjective judgments. The
ceiling calculation dictates that prices and costs in effect as
of the last day of the quarter are held constant. However, we
may not be subject to a writedown if prices increase subsequent
to the end of a quarter in which a writedown might otherwise be
required. The full cost ceiling test impairment calculations
also take into consideration the effects of hedging contracts
that are designated for hedge accounting. Given the fluctuation
of natural gas and oil prices, it is reasonably possible that
the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved
reserves will change in the near term. If natural gas and oil
prices decline, or if we have downward revisions to our
estimated proved reserves, it is possible that writedowns of our
oil and gas properties could occur in the future.
At December 31, 2007, the ceiling value of our domestic oil
and gas reserves was calculated based upon quoted market prices
of $6.80 per MMBtu for gas and $96.01 per barrel for oil,
adjusted for market differentials. Using these prices, the
ceiling exceeded the net capitalized costs of our domestic oil
and gas properties by approximately $1.9 billion (net of
tax) at December 31, 2007.
At December 31, 2007, the ceiling with respect to our oil
and gas properties in Malaysia and China exceeded the net
capitalized costs of the properties by approximately
$117 million and $70 million, respectively. Holding
all other factors constant, if the applicable index for oil
prices were to decline to approximately $70 per Bbl, it is
possible that we could experience a ceiling test writedown in
Malaysia. It is possible that we could experience a ceiling test
writedown in China if the applicable index for oil prices were
to decline to approximately $55 per Bbl, holding all other
factors constant.
Costs Withheld From Amortization. Costs
associated with unevaluated properties are excluded from our
amortization base until we have evaluated the properties. The
costs associated with unevaluated leasehold acreage and seismic
data, wells currently drilling and capitalized interest are
initially excluded from our amortization base. Leasehold costs
are either transferred to our amortization base with the costs
of drilling a well on the lease or are assessed quarterly for
possible impairment or reduction in value. Leasehold costs are
transferred to our amortization base to the extent a reduction
in value has occurred or a charge is made against earnings if
the costs were incurred in a country for which a reserve base
has not been established. If a reserve base for a country in
which we are conducting operations has not yet been established,
an impairment
Table of Contents
requiring a charge to earnings may be indicated through
evaluation of drilling results, relinquishing drilling rights or
other information.
In addition, a portion of incurred (if not previously included
in the amortization base) and future estimated development costs
associated with qualifying major development projects may be
temporarily excluded from amortization. To qualify, a project
must require significant costs to ascertain the quantities of
proved reserves attributable to the properties under development
(e.g., the installation of an offshore production platform from
which development wells are to be drilled). Incurred and
estimated future development costs are allocated between
completed and future work. Any temporarily excluded costs are
included in the amortization base upon the earlier of when the
associated reserves are determined to be proved or impairment is
indicated.
Our decision to withhold costs from amortization and the timing
of the transfer of those costs into the amortization base
involve a significant amount of judgment and may be subject to
changes over time based on several factors, including our
drilling plans, availability of capital, project economics and
results of drilling on adjacent acreage. At December 31,
2007, our domestic full cost pool had approximately
$1.1 billion of costs excluded from the amortization base.
Because the application of the full cost ceiling test at
December 31, 2007 resulted in a significant excess of the
cost-center ceiling over the carrying value of our domestic oil
and gas properties, inclusion of some or all of our unevaluated
property costs in our amortization base, without adding any
associated reserves, would not have resulted in a ceiling test
writedown. However, our future DD&A rate would increase to
the extent such costs are transferred without any associated
reserves.
Future Development and Abandonment
Costs. Future development costs include costs
incurred to obtain access to proved reserves such as drilling
costs and the installation of production equipment. Future
abandonment costs include costs to dismantle and relocate or
dispose of our production platforms, gathering systems and
related structures and restoration costs of land and seabed. We
develop estimates of these costs for each of our properties
based upon their geographic location, type of production
structure, water depth, reservoir depth and characteristics,
market demand for equipment, currently available procedures and
ongoing consultations with construction and engineering
consultants. Because these costs typically extend many years
into the future, estimating these future costs is difficult and
requires management to make judgments that are subject to future
revisions based upon numerous factors, including changing
technology and the political and regulatory environment. We
review our assumptions and estimates of future development and
abandonment costs on an annual basis, or more frequently if an
event occurs or circumstances change that would affect our
assumptions and estimates.
The accounting for future abandonment costs is set forth by
SFAS No. 143. This standard requires that a liability
for the discounted fair value of an asset retirement obligation
be recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the
corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount
of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to
its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the useful life of the related asset.
Holding all other factors constant, if our estimate of future
development and abandonment costs is revised upward, earnings
would decrease due to higher DD&A expense. Likewise, if
these estimates are revised downward, earnings would increase
due to lower DD&A expense. To increase our domestic
DD&A rate by $0.01 per Mcfe for the year ended
December 31, 2007 would require an increase in the present
value of our estimated future development and abandonment costs
at December 31, 2006 of approximately $38 million. Due
to the relatively small size of our international full cost
pools in Malaysia and China, a change greater than
$30 million and $9 million, respectively, in future
development or abandonment costs associated with the respective
countrys full cost pool would increase the DD&A rate
in that country by 10%. However, since production from our
international operations represented only about 6% of our
consolidated production for 2007, a change in our international
DD&A expense would not have materially affected our
consolidated results of operations.
Allocation of Purchase Price in Business
Combinations. As part of our growth strategy,
we actively pursue acquisitions of oil and gas properties. The
purchase price in an acquisition is allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair
values as of the acquisition date, which may occur many months
after the announcement date. Therefore, while the consideration
to be paid may be fixed, the fair
Table of Contents
value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is subject
to change during the period between the announcement date and
the acquisition date. Our most significant estimates in our
allocation typically relate to the value assigned to future
recoverable oil and gas reserves and unproved properties. To the
extent the consideration paid exceeds the fair value of the net
assets acquired, we are required to record the excess as an
asset called goodwill. As the allocation of the purchase price
is subject to significant estimates and subjective judgments,
the accuracy of this assessment is inherently uncertain. The
value allocated to recoverable oil and gas reserves and unproved
properties is subject to the cost center ceiling as described
under Full Cost Ceiling
Limitation above. The accounting for business
combinations will change in 2009. Please see New
Accounting Standards below for a detailed discussion.
Goodwill of each reporting unit (each country is a separate
reporting unit) is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or
more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that
would reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its
carrying amount. In making this assessment, we rely on a number
of factors including operating results, business plans, economic
projections and anticipated cash flows. As there are inherent
uncertainties related to these factors and our judgment in
applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment, there is
risk that the carrying value of our goodwill may be overstated.
If it is overstated, such impairment would reduce earnings
during the period in which the impairment occurs and would
result in a corresponding reduction to goodwill. We elected to
make December 31 our annual assessment date.
Commodity Derivative Activities. We
utilize derivative contracts to hedge against the variability in
cash flows associated with the forecasted sale of our future
natural gas and oil production. We generally hedge a
substantial, but varying, portion of our anticipated oil and
natural gas production for the next
12-24 months.
In the case of acquisitions, we may hedge acquired production
for a longer period. In addition, we may utilize basis contracts
to hedge the differential between the NYMEX Henry Hub posted
prices and those of our physical pricing points. We do not use
derivative instruments for trading purposes. Under accounting
rules, we may elect to designate those derivatives that qualify
for hedge accounting as cash flow hedges against the price that
we will receive for our future oil and natural gas production.
To the extent that changes in the fair values of the cash flow
hedges offset changes in the expected cash flows from our
forecasted production, such amounts are not included in our
consolidated results of operations. Instead, they are recorded
directly to stockholders equity until the hedged oil or
natural gas quantities are produced and sold. To the extent that
changes in the fair values of the derivative exceed the changes
in the expected cash flows from the forecasted production, the
changes are recorded in income in the period in which they
occur. Derivatives that do not qualify or have not been
designated as cash flow hedges for hedge accounting are carried
at their fair value on our consolidated balance sheet. We
recognize all changes in the fair value of these contracts on
our consolidated statement of income in the period in which the
changes occur. Beginning on October 1, 2005, we elected not
to designate any future price risk management activities as
accounting hedges. Because derivative contracts not designated
for hedge accounting are accounted for on a
mark-to-market
basis, we are likely to experience significant non-cash
volatility in our reported earnings during periods of commodity
price volatility.
In determining the amounts to be recorded for our open hedge
contracts, we are required to estimate the fair value of the
derivative. Our estimates are based upon various factors that
include closing prices on the NYMEX,
over-the-counter
quotations, volatility and the time value of options. The
calculation of the fair value of our option contracts requires
the use of an option-pricing model. The estimated future prices
are compared to the prices fixed by the hedge agreements and the
resulting estimated future cash inflows or outflows over the
lives of the hedges are discounted to calculate the fair value
of the derivative contracts. These pricing and discounting
variables are sensitive to market volatility as well as changes
in future price forecasts, regional price differences and
interest rates. We periodically validate our valuations using
independent, third-party quotations.
Stock-Based Compensation. On
January 1, 2006, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Statement (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004)
(SFAS No. 123(R)), Share-Based
Payment, to account for stock-based compensation.
Among other items, SFAS No. 123(R) eliminated the use
of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25),
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and the
intrinsic value
Table of Contents
method of accounting and requires companies to recognize in
their financial statements the cost of services received in
exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant
date fair value of those awards. We elected to use the modified
prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation
expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other
equity-based compensation beginning in the first quarter of
adoption. For all unvested options outstanding as of
January 1, 2006, the previously measured but unrecognized
compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original
grant date, has been or will be recognized in our financial
statements over the remaining vesting period. For equity-based
compensation awards granted or modified subsequent to
January 1, 2006, compensation expense, based on the fair
value on the date of grant or modification, has been or will be
recognized in our financial statements over the vesting period.
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the
fair value of stock options and a lattice-based model for our
performance and market-based restricted shares. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we followed the intrinsic
value method in accordance with APB 25 to account for
stock-based compensation. See Note 10, Stock-Based
Compensation, for a full discussion of our stock-based
compensation.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes criteria to be considered when measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In
February 2008, the FASB granted a one-year deferral of the
effective date of this statement as it applies to nonfinancial
assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis (e.g. those measured at fair value
in a business combination and goodwill impairment). This
statement is effective for all recurring measures of financial
assets and financial liabilities (e.g. derivatives and
investment securities) for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We will adopt the provisions of this
statement for all recurring measures of financial assets and
liabilities on January 1, 2008. We have completed our
initial evaluation of the impact of SFAS No. 157 as it
relates to our financial assets and liabilities and determined
that its adoption is not expected to have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R)
replaces SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree. The statement also recognizes and
measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a
gain from a bargain purchase and determines what information to
disclose in the financial statements. SFAS No. 141(R)
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. An entity may not apply it before that date.
Regulation
Exploration and development and the production and sale of oil
and natural gas are subject to extensive federal, state, local
and international regulation. An overview of this regulation is
set forth below. We believe we are in substantial compliance
with currently applicable laws and regulations and that
continued substantial compliance with existing requirements will
not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
cash flows or results of operations. However, current regulatory
requirements may change, currently unforeseen environmental
incidents may occur or past non-compliance with environmental
laws or regulations may be discovered. Please see the discussion
under the caption We are subject to complex laws that
can affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing
business in Item 1A of this report.
Federal Regulation of Sales and Transportation of Natural
Gas. Our sales of natural gas are affected
directly or indirectly by the availability, terms and cost of
natural gas transportation. The prices and terms for access to
pipeline transportation of natural gas are subject to extensive
federal and state regulation. The transportation and sale for
resale of natural gas in interstate commerce is regulated
primarily under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and by regulations and
orders promulgated under the NGA by the FERC. In certain limited
circumstances, intrastate transportation and wholesale sales of
natural gas may also be affected directly or indirectly by laws
enacted by Congress and by FERC regulations.
Table of Contents
The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, or OCSLA, requires that
all pipelines operating on or across the shelf provide
open-access, non-discriminatory service. There are currently no
regulations implemented by the FERC under its OCSLA authority on
gatherers and other entities outside the reach of its Natural
Gas Act jurisdiction. Therefore, we do not believe that any FERC
or MMS action taken under OCSLA will affect us in a way that
materially differs from the way it will affect other natural gas
producers, gatherers and marketers with which we compete.
On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed into law the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (2005 EPA). This comprehensive act
contains many provisions that will encourage oil and gas
exploration and development in the U.S. The 2005 EPA
directs the FERC, MMS and other federal agencies to issue
regulations that will further the goals set out in the 2005 EPA.
The 2005 EPA also increased civil and criminal penalties for any
violations of the NGA, the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, and
any rules, regulations or orders of the FERC up to
$1 million per day per violation. The FERC issued a final
rule effective January 26, 2006 that makes it unlawful for
any entity, in connection with the purchase or sale of natural
gas or transportation service subject to the FERCs
jurisdiction, to defraud, make an untrue statement or omit a
material fact or engage in any practice, act or course of
business that operates or would operate as a fraud. These
changes resulting from the 2005 EPA have significantly expanded
and strengthened oversight of natural gas markets. We believe,
however, that neither the 2005 EPA nor the regulations
promulgated, or to be promulgated, as a result of the 2005 EPA
will affect us in a way that materially differs from the way
they affect other natural gas producers, gatherers and marketers
with which we compete.
The current statutory and regulatory framework governing
interstate natural gas transactions is subject to change in the
future, and the nature of such changes is impossible to predict.
Additional proposals and proceedings that might affect the
natural gas industry are pending before Congress, the FERC and
the courts. The natural gas industry historically has been very
heavily regulated; therefore, there is no assurance that the
less stringent regulatory approach recently pursued by the FERC
and Congress will continue. In the past, the federal government
regulated the prices at which gas could be sold. Congress
removed all price and non-price controls affecting wellhead
sales of natural gas effective January 1, 1993. There is
always some risk, however, that Congress may reenact price
controls in the future. Changes in law and to FERC policies and
regulations may adversely affect the availability and
reliability of interruptible transportation service on
interstate pipelines, and we cannot predict what future action
the FERC will take. We do not believe, however, that any
regulatory changes will affect us in a way that materially
differs from the way they will affect other natural gas
producers, gatherers and marketers with which we compete.
Federal Regulation of Sales and Transportation of Crude
Oil. Our sales of crude oil and condensate
are currently not regulated. In a number of instances, however,
the ability to transport and sell such products are dependent on
pipelines whose rates, terms and conditions of service are
subject to FERC jurisdiction under the Interstate Commerce Act.
Certain regulations implemented by the FERC in recent years
could result in an increase in the cost of transportation
service on certain petroleum products pipelines. However, we do
not believe that these regulations affect us any differently
than other crude oil and condensate producers.
Federal Leases. Our oil and gas leases
in the Gulf of Mexico and many of our leases in the Rocky
Mountains are granted by the federal government and administered
by the MMS or the BLM, both federal agencies. MMS and BLM leases
contain relatively standardized terms and require compliance
with detailed BLM or MMS regulations and, in the case of
offshore leases, orders pursuant to OCSLA (which are subject to
change by the MMS). Many onshore leases contain stipulations
limiting activities that may be conducted on the lease. Some
stipulations are unique to particular geographic areas and may
limit the time during which activities on the lease may be
conducted, the manner in which certain activities may be
conducted or, in some cases, may ban surface activity. For
offshore operations, lessees must obtain MMS approval for
exploration, development and production plans prior to the
commencement of such operations. In addition to permits required
from other agencies (such as the Coast Guard, the Army Corps of
Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency), lessees must
obtain a permit from the BLM or the MMS, as applicable, prior to
the commencement of drilling, and comply with regulations
governing, among other things, engineering and construction
specifications for production facilities, safety procedures,
plugging and abandonment of wells on the Shelf and removal of
facilities. To cover the various obligations of lessees on the
Shelf, the MMS generally requires that lessees
Table of Contents
have substantial net worth or post bonds or other acceptable
assurances that such obligations will be met. The cost of such
bonds or other surety can be substantial and there is no
assurance that bonds or other surety can be obtained in all
cases. We are currently exempt from the supplemental bonding
requirements of the MMS. Under certain circumstances, the BLM or
the MMS, as applicable, may require that our operations on
federal leases be suspended or terminated. Any such suspension
or termination could materially and adversely affect our
financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
The MMS regulations governing the calculation of royalties and
the valuation of crude oil produced from federal leases provide
that the MMS will collect royalties based upon the market value
of oil produced from federal leases. The 2005 EPA formalizes the
royalty in-kind program of the MMS, providing that the MMS may
take royalties in-kind if the Secretary of the Interior
determines that the benefits are greater than or equal to the
benefits that are likely to have been received had royalties
been taken in value. We believe that the MMSs royalty
in-kind program will not have a material effect on our financial
position, cash flows or results of operations.
In 2006, the MMS amended its regulations to require additional
filing fees. The MMS has estimated that these additional filing
fees will represent less than 0.1% of the revenues of companies
with offshore operations in most cases. We do not believe that
these additional filing fees will affect us in a way that
materially differs from the way they affect other producers,
gatherers and marketers with which we compete.
State and Local Regulation of Drilling and
Production. We own interests in properties
located onshore in a number of states and in state waters
offshore Texas and Louisiana. Please see the table under
Acreage Data in Item 2 of this report. These
states regulate drilling and operating activities by requiring,
among other things, permits for the drilling of wells,
maintaining bonding requirements in order to drill or operate
wells, and regulating the location of wells, the method of
drilling and casing wells, the surface use and restoration of
properties upon which wells are drilled and the plugging and
abandonment of wells. The laws of these states also govern a
number of environmental and conservation matters, including the
handling and disposing or discharge of waste materials, the size
of drilling and spacing units or proration units and the density
of wells that may be drilled, unitization and pooling of oil and
gas properties and establishment of maximum rates of production
from oil and gas wells. Some states have the power to prorate
production to the market demand for oil and gas.
Environmental Regulations. Our
operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations
governing the discharge of materials into the environment or
otherwise relating to environmental protection. The cost of
compliance could be significant. Failure to comply with these
laws and regulations may result in the assessment of
administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of
remedial and damage payment obligations, or the issuance of
injunctive relief (including orders to cease operations).
Environmental laws and regulations are complex, and have tended
to become more stringent over time. We also are subject to
various environmental permit requirements. Both onshore and
offshore drilling in certain areas has been opposed by
environmental groups and, in certain areas, has been restricted.
Moreover, some environmental laws and regulations may impose
strict liability, which could subject us to liability for
conduct that was lawful at the time it occurred or conduct or
conditions caused by prior operators or third parties. To the
extent laws are enacted or other governmental action is taken
that prohibits or restricts onshore or offshore drilling or
imposes environmental protection requirements that result in
increased costs to the oil and gas industry in general, our
business and financial results could be adversely affected.
The Oil Pollution Act, or OPA, imposes regulations on
responsible parties related to the prevention of oil
spills and liability for damages resulting from spills in
U.S. waters. A responsible party includes the
owner or operator of an onshore facility, vessel or pipeline, or
the lessee or permittee of the area in which an offshore
facility is located. OPA assigns strict, joint and several
liability to each responsible party for oil removal costs and a
variety of public and private damages. While liability limits
apply in some circumstances, a party cannot take advantage of
liability limits if the spill was caused by gross negligence or
willful misconduct or resulted from violation of a federal
safety, construction or operating regulation, or if the party
fails to report a spill or to cooperate fully in the cleanup.
Even if applicable, the liability limits for offshore facilities
require the responsible party to pay all removal costs, plus up
to $75 million in other damages for offshore facilities and
up to $350 million for onshore facilities. Few defenses
exist to the liability imposed by
Table of Contents
OPA. Failure to comply with ongoing requirements or inadequate
cooperation during a spill event may subject a responsible party
to administrative, civil or criminal enforcement actions.
OPA also requires operators in the Gulf of Mexico to demonstrate
to the MMS that they possess available financial resources that
are sufficient to pay for costs that may be incurred in
responding to an oil spill. Under OPA and implementing MMS
regulations, responsible parties are required to demonstrate
that they possess financial resources sufficient to pay for
environmental cleanup and restoration costs of at least
$10 million for an oil spill in state waters and at least
$35 million for an oil spill in federal waters.
In addition to OPA, our discharges to waters of the
U.S. are further limited by the federal Clean Water Act, or
CWA, and analogous state laws. The CWA prohibits any discharge
into waters of the United States except in compliance with
permits issued by federal and state governmental agencies.
Failure to comply with the CWA, including discharge limits set
by permits issued pursuant to the CWA, may also result in
administrative, civil or criminal enforcement actions. The OPA
and CWA also require the preparation of oil spill response plans
and spill prevention, control and countermeasure or
SPCC plans. We have such plans in existence and are
currently amending these plans or, as necessary, developing new
SPCC plans that will satisfy new SPCC plan certification and
implementation requirements that become effective in July 2009.
OCSLA authorizes regulations relating to safety and
environmental protection applicable to lessees and permittees
operating on the Shelf. Specific design and operational
standards may apply to vessels, rigs, platforms, vehicles and
structures operating or located on the Shelf. Violations of
lease conditions or regulations issued pursuant to OCSLA can
result in substantial administrative, civil and criminal
penalties, as well as potential court injunctions curtailing
operations and the cancellation of leases.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, generally
regulates the disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and imposes
certain environmental cleanup obligations. Although RCRA
specifically excludes from the definition of hazardous waste
drilling fluids, produced waters and other wastes
associated with the exploration, development or production of
crude oil, natural gas or geothermal energy, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, also known as the
EPA, and state agencies may regulate these wastes as
solid wastes. Moreover, ordinary industrial wastes, such as
paint wastes, waste solvents, laboratory wastes and waste oils,
may be regulated as hazardous waste.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or the Superfund
law, and comparable state laws impose liability, without regard
to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on persons
that are considered to have contributed to the release of a
hazardous substance into the environment. Such
responsible persons may be subject to joint and
several liability under the Superfund law for the costs of
cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released
into the environment and for damages to natural resources, and
it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third
parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage
allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the
environment. We currently own or lease onshore properties that
have been used for the exploration and production of oil and gas
for a number of years. Many of these onshore properties have
been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or
release of hydrocarbons or other wastes was not under our
control. These properties and any wastes that may have been
disposed or released on them may be subject to the Superfund
law, RCRA and analogous state laws and common law obligations,
and we potentially could be required to investigate and
remediate such properties, including soil or groundwater
contamination by prior owners or operators, or to perform
remedial plugging or pit closure operations to prevent future
contamination.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) and comparable state statutes restrict
the emission of air pollutants and affects both onshore and
offshore oil and gas operations. New facilities may be required
to obtain separate construction and operating permits before
construction work can begin or operations may start, and
existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in
order to remain in compliance. Also, the EPA has developed and
continues to develop more stringent regulations governing
emissions of toxic air pollutants. These regulations may
increase the costs of compliance for some facilities.
Table of Contents
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and comparable
state statutes regulate the protection of the health and safety
of workers. The OSHA hazard communication standard requires
maintenance of information about hazardous materials used or
produced in operations and provision of such information to
employees. Other OSHA standards regulate specific worker safety
aspects of our operations. Failure to comply with OSHA
requirements can lead to the imposition of penalties.
International Regulations. Our
exploration and production operations outside the United States
are subject to various types of regulations similar to those
described above imposed by the respective governments of the
countries in which we operate, and may affect our operations and
costs within that country. We currently have operations in
Malaysia and China.
This report contains information that is forward-looking or
relates to anticipated future events or results such as planned
capital expenditures, future drilling plans and programs,
expected production rates, the availability and source of
capital resources to fund capital expenditures, estimates of
proved reserves and the estimated present value of such
reserves, our financing plans and our business strategy and
other plans and objectives for future operations. Although we
believe that these expectations are reasonable, this information
is based upon assumptions and anticipated results that are
subject to numerous uncertainties. Actual results may vary
significantly from those anticipated due to many factors,
including:
All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to
us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in
their entirety by such factors.
Below are explanations of some commonly used terms in the oil
and gas business.
Basis risk. The risk associated with
the sales point price for oil or gas production varying from the
reference (or settlement) price for a particular hedging
transaction.
Barrel or Bbl. One stock tank barrel,
or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume.
Bcf. Billion cubic feet.
Bcfe. Billion cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one
barrel of crude oil or condensate.
BLM. The Bureau of Land Management of
the United States Department of the Interior.
BOPD. Barrels of oil per day.
Btu. British thermal unit, which is the
heat required to raise the temperature of a one-pound mass of
water from 58.5 to 59.5 degrees Fahrenheit.
Table of Contents
Completion. The installation of
permanent equipment for the production of oil or natural gas.
Deepwater. Generally considered to be
water depths in excess of 1,000 feet.
Developed acreage. The number of acres
that are allocated or assignable to producing wells or wells
capable of production.
Development well. A well drilled within
the proved area of an oil or natural gas field to the depth of a
stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
Dry hole or well. A well found to be
incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities
such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceed
production expenses and taxes.
Exploitation well. An exploration well
drilled to find and produce probable reserves. Most of the
exploitation wells we drilled in 2005, 2006 and 2007 and expect
to drill in 2008 are located in the Mid-Continent or the
Monument Butte field. Exploitation wells in those areas have
less risk and less reserve potential and typically may be
drilled at a lower cost than other exploration wells. For
internal reporting and budgeting purposes, we combine
exploitation and development activities.
Exploration well. A well drilled to
find and produce oil or natural gas reserves that is not a
development well. For internal reporting and budgeting purposes,
we exclude exploitation activities from exploration activities.
Farm-in or farm-out. An agreement
whereunder the owner of a working interest in an oil and gas
lease assigns the working interest or a portion thereof to
another party who desires to drill on the leased acreage.
Generally, the assignee is required to drill one or more wells
in order to earn its interest in the acreage. The assignor
usually retains a royalty or reversionary interest in the lease.
The interest received by an assignee is a farm-in,
while the interest transferred by the assignor is a
farm-out.
FERC. The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
FPSO. A floating production, storage
and off-loading vessel commonly used overseas to produce oil
from locations where pipeline infrastructure is not available.
Field. An area consisting of a single
reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to
the same individual geological structural feature or
stratigraphic condition.
Gross acres or gross wells. The total
acres or wells in which we own a working interest.
Infill drilling or infill well. A well
drilled between known producing wells to improve oil and natural
gas reserve recovery efficiency.
MBbls. One thousand barrels of crude
oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
Mcf. One thousand cubic feet.
Mcfe. One thousand cubic feet
equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas
to one barrel of crude oil or condensate.
MMS. The Minerals Management Service of
the United States Department of the Interior.
MMBbls. One million barrels of crude
oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
MMBtu. One million Btus.
Net acres or net wells. The sum of the
fractional working interests we own in gross acres or gross
wells, as the case may be.
NYMEX. The New York Mercantile Exchange.
Probable reserves. Reserves which
analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering
data does not demonstrate to be proved under current technology
and existing economic conditions, but where such analysis
suggests the likelihood of their existence and future recovery.
Table of Contents
Productive well. A well that is found
to be capable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities
such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceed
production expenses and taxes.
Promoted drilling. An agreement where
under the owner of this type of interest in the drilling of a
well incurs a disproportionate share of costs associated with
the well until the well is drilled and completed.
Proved developed producing
reserves. Proved developed reserves that are
expected to be recovered from completion intervals currently
open in existing wells and capable of production to market.
Proved developed reserves. In general,
proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered from
existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
The SEC provides a complete definition of proved developed
reserves in
Rule 4-10(a)(3)
of
Regulation S-X.
Proved developed nonproducing
reserves. Proved developed reserves expected
to be recovered from zones behind casing in existing wells.
Proved reserves. In general, the
estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas
liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate with
reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions. The SEC provides a complete definition of proved
reserves in
Rule 4-10(a)(2)
of
Regulation S-X.
Proved undeveloped reserves. In
general, proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from
new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a
relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. The
SEC provides a complete definition of proved undeveloped
reserves in
Rule 4-10(a)(4)
of
Regulation S-X.
Reserve life index. This index is
calculated by dividing total proved reserves at year end by
annual production to estimate the number of years of remaining
production.
Shelf. The U.S. Outer Continental
Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. Water depths generally range from
50 feet to 1,000 feet.
Tcfe. One trillion cubic feet
equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas
to one barrel of crude oil or condensate.
Unconventional resource
plays. Plays targeting tight sand, coal bed
or gas shale reservoirs. The reservoirs tend to cover large
areas and lack the readily apparent traps, seals and discrete
hydrocarbon-water boundaries that typically define conventional
reservoirs. These reservoirs generally require stimulation
treatments or other special recovery processes in order to
produce economically.
Undeveloped acreage. Lease acreage on
which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that
would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and
natural gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved
reserves.
Waterflood. A secondary recovery
operation in which water is injected into the producing
formation in order to maintain reservoir pressure and force oil
toward and into the producing wells.
Working interest. The operating
interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and
conduct operating activities on the property and a share of
production.
Workover. Operations on a producing
well to restore or increase production.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||