|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
Nuance Communications 10-K 2007 Documents found in this filing:Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(781) 565-5000
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
None
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common equity held
by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last business day
of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter was approximately $2,168,279,194 based upon the last
reported sales price on the Nasdaq National Market for such
date. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of Common Stock
held by officers and directors of the Registrant and by persons
who hold more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock have been
excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.
This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily
conclusive.
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of October 31, 2007, was 193,459,481.
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement to
be delivered to stockholders in connection with the
Registrants 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Table of Contents
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our results
to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements
of historical fact are statements that could be deemed
forward-looking, including statements pertaining to: our
revenue, earnings, cash flows and liquidity; our strategy
relating to speech and imaging technologies; the potential of
future product releases; our product development plans and
investments in research and development; future acquisitions;
international operations and localized versions of our products;
our contractual commitments; our fiscal 2008 revenue and expense
expectations and legal proceedings and litigation matters. You
can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the
use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth in this Annual Report under the
heading Risk Factors. All forward-looking statements
included in this document are based on information available to
us on the date hereof. We will not undertake and specifically
decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of
speech-based solutions for businesses and consumers worldwide.
Our speech solutions are designed to transform the way people
interact with information systems, mobile devices and services.
We have designed our solutions to make the user experience more
compelling, convenient, safe and satisfying; unlocking the full
potential of these systems, devices and services.
The vast improvements in the power and features of information
systems and mobile devices have increased their complexity and
reduced their ease of use. Many of the systems, devices and
services designed to make our lives easier are cumbersome to
use, involving complex touch-tone menus in call centers,
counterintuitive and inconsistent user interfaces on computers
and mobile devices, inefficient manual processes for
transcribing medical records and automobile dashboards overrun
with buttons and dials. These complex interfaces often limit the
ability of the average user to take full advantage of the
functionality and convenience offered by these products and
services. By using the spoken word, our speech solutions help
people naturally obtain information, interact with mobile
devices and access services such as navigation, online banking
and medical transcription.
We provide speech solutions to several rapidly growing markets:
Table of Contents
In addition to our speech offerings, we provide PDF and document
solutions that reduce the time and cost associated with
creating, using and sharing documents. Our solutions benefit
from the widespread adoption of the PDF format and the
increasing demand for networked solutions for managing
electronic documents. Our solutions are used by millions of
professionals and within large enterprises.
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative speech and imaging solutions for businesses and
organizations around the globe. We market and distribute our
products indirectly through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors, and directly through our dedicated
sales force and through our
e-commerce
website.
We have built a world-class portfolio of speech solutions
through both internal development and acquisitions. We expect to
continue to pursue opportunities to broaden our solutions and
customer base through acquisitions. Our recently completed
transactions include:
Table of Contents
Confronted by dramatic increases in electronic information,
consumers, business personnel and healthcare professionals must
use a variety of resources to retrieve information, transcribe
patient records, conduct transactions and perform other
job-related functions. We believe that the power of the spoken
word will transform the way people use the Internet,
telecommunications systems, wireless and mobile networks and
related corporate infrastructure to conduct business. We believe
that several key market trends will enhance our market position
and create new business opportunities:
Nuance
Solutions
Our speech solutions enable enterprises, professionals and
consumers to increase productivity, reduce costs and save time
by using voice control to improve the user experience. Our
imaging solutions build on decades of experience and technology
development to deliver businesses, manufacturers and consumers a
broad set of PDF and document offerings. We provide a broad set
of speech and imaging offerings to our customers in the
following areas:
To remain competitive, organizations must improve the quality of
customer care while reducing costs and ensuring a positive
customer experience. Technological innovation, competitive
pressures and rapid commoditization have made it increasingly
difficult for organizations to achieve enduring market
differentiation or to secure customer loyalty. In this
environment, organizations need to satisfy the expectations of
increasingly savvy and mobile consumers who demand high levels
of customer service. This increase in consumer expectations
necessitates a change in the way organizations approach customer
care and respond to customer needs.
Table of Contents
We deliver a portfolio of customer service and business
intelligence solutions enabled by speech that are designed to
help companies better support, understand and communicate with
their customers. Our solutions improve the customer experience,
increase the use of self-service and enable new revenue
opportunities. We also offer business intelligence solutions,
which allow companies to draw knowledge from their customer care
interactions to improve overall business performance.
Our portfolio of enterprise speech solutions includes:
We license our solutions to a wide variety of enterprises in
customer-service intensive sectors, including
telecommunications, financial services, travel and
entertainment, and government, where customers include AOL,
AT&T, Comcast, Charles Schwab and United Health. Our speech
solutions are designed to serve our global partners and
customers and are available in up to 49 languages and
dialects worldwide. Although in certain cases we sell directly
to end users, the majority of our solutions are fulfilled
through our channel network that includes providers such as
Avaya, Cisco, Genesys, Intervoice and Nortel, that integrate our
solutions into their hardware and software platforms.
We complement our solutions and products with a global
professional services organization that supports customers and
partners with business and systems consulting project
management, user-interface design, speech science, application
development, and business performance optimization. Our
acquisition of BeVocal expanded our existing product portfolio
with a unique set of solutions for lifecycle management of
customers of wireless carriers and a range of premium services
for the wireless consumer, such as the Web and Short Message
Service (SMS). The BeVocal acquisition also added numerous
wireless carrier relationships to our network. Our recent
acquisition of Viecore expands our professional services
capabilities and complements our existing partnerships, allowing
us to deliver end-to-end speech solutions and system integration
for speech-enabled customer care in key vertical markets
including financial services, telecommunications, healthcare,
utilities and government.
Today, an increasing number of people worldwide rely on mobile
devices to stay connected, informed and productive. We see an
expanding opportunity in helping consumers use the powerful
capabilities of their phones, cars and personal navigation
devices by using voice commands to control these devices and to
access the array of content and services available on the
Internet through wireless mobile devices. We expect to serve
more than one billion consumers within the next three years with
voice-based mobile solutions that allow them to simply and
effectively navigate and retrieve information and conduct
transactions using these devices.
Table of Contents
We offer solutions and expertise that help satisfy the
accelerating demand for speech-enabled mobile devices and
services. Our portfolio of mobile solutions includes:
Our mobile solutions are used by mobile phone, automotive,
personal navigation device and other consumer electronic
manufacturers and their suppliers, including Mitsubishi
Electronics, LG Electronics, Group Sense and Delphi. In
addition, telecommunications carriers, Web search companies and
content providers are increasingly using our mobile search and
communication solutions to offer value-added services to their
subscribers and customers.
The recent acquisitions of VoiceSignal and Tegic will enhance
our offerings to mobile device manufacturers. The VoiceSignal
acquisition provides voice-recognition technologies in mobile
search, messaging, and command and control that complement our
current capabilities. The Tegic acquisition provides us with
predictive text and touch technologies. The combination of
Nuance, VoiceSignal and Tegic sets the stage for a new mobile
user interface that integrates predictive text, speech and touch
inputs. This multimodal interface will provide easier access for
users of mobile devices and will be available to all
manufacturers across their product lines.
The healthcare industry is under significant pressure to
streamline operations and reduce costs and improve patient care.
In recent years, healthcare organizations such as hospitals,
clinics, medical groups, physicians offices, and insurance
providers have increasingly turned to speech solutions to
automate manual processes such as the dictation and
transcription of patient records.
We provide comprehensive dictation and transcription solutions
and services that automate the input and management of medical
information. Since 2004, we have steadily increased our
investments in solutions for the healthcare industry. We are
dedicating substantial resources to product development, sales,
business development and marketing in an effort to replace
traditional manual transcription before the end of the decade.
Our healthcare dictation and transcription solutions include:
Table of Contents
Hospitals, clinics and group practices, including Adventist
Health, Allina Health, Guthrie Healthcare, Mt. Kisco
Medical, and Sarasota Memorial, and approximately 300,000
physicians use our Dictaphone healthcare solutions to manage the
dictation and transcription of patient records. We utilize a
focused, enterprise sales team and professional services
organization to address the market and implementation
requirements of the healthcare industry.
The acquisition of Focus expanded our ability to deliver
healthcare transcription solutions. The combination of
Focus proven technology portfolio and services capability
and the Dictaphone iChart Web-based transcription solutions
creates an efficient, scalable Web-based automated transcription
service. Focus serves some of the largest U.S. healthcare
organizations, combining the use of speech recognition, a
Web-based editing platform and manual transcription services
based in India to achieve superior customer satisfaction,
turnaround time and cost efficiency. Our recent acquisitions of
Commissure and Vocada expand the capabilities of our Dictaphone
Healthcare solutions for the medical imaging industry, enhance
our domain expertise in the radiology market and reporting of
clinical test results, respectively, and increase our recurring
revenue base derived from a software-as-a-service business model.
In addition to our healthcare-oriented dictation solutions, we
also offer Dragon NaturallySpeaking, a suite of general
purpose desktop dictation applications that increases
productivity by using speech to create documents, streamline
repetitive and complex tasks, input data, complete forms and
automate manual transcription processes.
Our Dragon NaturallySpeaking family of products delivers
enhanced productivity for professionals and consumers who need
to create documents and transcripts. These solutions allow users
to automatically convert speech into text at up to 160
words-per-minute,
with support for over 300,000 words and with an accuracy rate of
up to 99%. This vocabulary can be expanded by users to include
specialized words and phrases and can be adapted to recognize
individual voice patterns. Our desktop dictation software is
currently available in eleven languages. We utilize a
combination of our global reseller network and direct sales to
distribute our speech recognition and dictation products.
The proliferation of the Internet, email and other networks have
greatly simplified the ability to share electronic documents,
resulting in an ever-growing volume of documents to be used and
stored. Our solutions reduce the costs associated with paper
documents through easy to use scanning, document management and
electronic document routing solutions. We offer versions of our
products to hardware vendors, home offices, small businesses and
enterprise customers.
Our PDF and document solutions include:
Table of Contents
We utilize a combination of our global reseller network and
direct sales to distribute our document conversion and PDF
products. We license our software to companies such as Brother,
Canon, Dell, HP and Xerox, which bundle our solutions with
multifunction devices, digital copiers, printers and scanners.
We also license software development toolkits to independent
software vendors who use our technology for production capture
or desktop applications, including vendors such as Autodesk,
Canon, EMC/Captiva, Filenet, Kofax, Microsoft, Sharp and Verity.
We focus on providing market-leading, value-added solutions for
our customers and partners through a broad set of technologies,
service offerings and channel capabilities. We intend to pursue
growth through the following key elements of our strategy:
In recent years, we have developed and acquired extensive
technology assets, intellectual property and industry expertise
in speech and imaging that provide us with a competitive
advantage in markets where we compete. Our technologies are
based on complex algorithms which require extensive amounts of
linguistic and image data, acoustic models and recognition
techniques. A significant investment in capital and time would
be necessary to replicate our current capabilities.
We continue to invest in technologies to maintain our
market-leading position and to develop new applications. Our
technologies are covered by more than 540 issued patents and 490
patent applications. Our intellectual
Table of Contents
property, whether purchased or developed internally, is critical
to our success and competitive position and, ultimately, to our
market value. Our products and services build on a portfolio of
patents, copyrights, trademarks, services marks, trade secrets,
confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements to
establish and protect our intellectual property and proprietary
rights.
We have principal offices in a number of international locations
including: Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hungary, India, Japan,
Australia, and the United Kingdom. The responsibilities of our
international operations include research and development,
healthcare transcription and editing customer support, sales and
marketing and administration. Additionally, we maintain smaller
sales, services and support offices throughout the world to
support our international customers and to expand international
revenue opportunities.
Geographic revenue classification is based on the geographic
areas in which our customers are located. For fiscal 2007, 2006
and 2005, 78%, 74% and 69% of revenue was generated in the
United States and 22%, 26% and 31% of revenue was generated by
our international operations, respectively.
The individual markets in which we compete are highly
competitive and are subject to rapid technology changes. There
are a number of companies that develop or may develop products
that compete in our target markets; however, currently there is
no one company that competes with us in all of our product
areas. While we expect competition to continue to increase both
from existing competitors and new market entrants, we believe
that we will compete effectively based on many factors,
including:
Within speech, we compete with AT&T, IBM, Microsoft,
Telisma and other small providers. Within healthcare dictation
and transcription, we compete with eScription, Philips Medical,
Spheris and other smaller providers. Within imaging, we compete
directly with ABBYY, Adobe, eCopy, and I.R.I.S. In speech, some
of our partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and Nortel
develop and market products that can be considered substitutes
for our solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies in
both speech and imaging produce technologies or products that
are competitive with our solutions in some markets. Current and
potential competitors have established, or may establish,
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their technologies to address the
needs of our prospective customers.
Table of Contents
Some of our competitors or potential competitors in our markets,
such as Adobe, IBM and Microsoft, have significantly greater
financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. These
competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to
new or emerging technologies or changes in customer
requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the
development, promotion and sale of their products than we do.
As of September 30, 2007, we had approximately 3,900 full
time employees in total, including approximately 600 in sales
and marketing, approximately 650 in professional services,
approximately 700 in research and development, approximately 350
in general and administrative and approximately 1,600 that
provide healthcare transcription and editing services.
Approximately, fifty-five percent of our employees are based
outside of the United States, the majority of whom are based in
India. Our employees are not represented by any labor union and
are not organized under a collective bargaining agreement, and
we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our
relationships with our employees are generally good.
Our website is located at www.nuance.com. This Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
our Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to these reports, as well as proxy statements
and other information we file with or furnish to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or the SEC, are accessible free of
charge on our website. We make these documents available as soon
as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish
them to, the SEC. Except as otherwise stated in these documents,
the information contained on our website or available by
hyperlink from our website is not incorporated by reference into
this report or any other documents we file with or furnish to
the SEC.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given
this fluctuation, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful
or an accurate indicator of our future performance. As a result,
our results of operations may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors in the future. If this occurs,
the price of our stock would likely decline. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in operating results include the
following:
Table of Contents
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly to
respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions, including our
acquisitions of Dictaphone, Focus, BeVocal, VoiceSignal, Tegic,
Commissure, Vocada and Viecore. We may continue to issue equity
securities for future acquisitions, which would dilute existing
stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on the terms of
such acquisitions. We may also incur additional debt in
connection with future acquisitions, which, if available at all,
may place additional restrictions on our ability to operate our
business.
Our prior acquisitions required, and our recently completed
acquisitions continue to require, substantial integration and
management efforts and we expect our pending and future
acquisitions to require similar efforts. Acquisitions of this
nature involve a number of risks, including:
Table of Contents
As a result of these and other risks, if we are unable to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, we may not realize
the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we record the market value of our common
stock or other form of consideration issued in connection with
the acquisition and the amount of direct transaction costs as
the cost of acquiring the company or business. We have allocated
that cost to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, including various identifiable intangible assets such
as acquired technology, acquired trade names and acquired
customer relationships based on their respective fair values.
Intangible assets generally will be amortized over a five to ten
year period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with
indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization but are
subject to an impairment analysis, at least annually, which may
result in an impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its
implied fair value. As of September 30, 2007, we had
identified intangible assets amounting to approximately
$391.2 million and goodwill of approximately
$1.2 billion. In addition, purchase accounting limits our
ability to recognize certain revenue that otherwise would have
been recognized by the acquired company as an independent
business. The combined company may delay revenue recognition or
recognize less revenue than we and the acquired company would
have recognized as independent companies.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of September 30,
2007, we had a total of $913.7 million of gross debt
outstanding, including $663.7 million in term loans due in
March 2013 and $250.0 million in convertible debentures
which investors may require us to redeem in August 2014. We also
have a $75.0 million revolving credit line available to us
through March 2012. As of September 30, 2007, there were
$17.3 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line. Our debt level could
have important consequences, for example it could:
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our
debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and
regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be
available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet
our payment obligations under the convertible debentures and our
other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt,
including the convertible debentures, sell assets, reduce or
delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
If we are unable to implement one or more of these
Table of Contents
alternatives, we may not be able to meet our payment obligations
under the convertible debentures and our other debt.
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our cash flows. While we have entered into an interest rate swap
agreement limiting our exposure for a portion of our debt, the
agreement does not offer complete protection from this risk.
The agreement governing our senior credit facility contains, and
any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant
restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business,
including restrictions on our ability to:
Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic
conditions. As a result of these covenants, our ability to
respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to
obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly
restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in
transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In
addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under our debt, which could permit the
holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt. If any
of our debt is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds
available to repay the accelerated debt.
We reported net losses of approximately $14.0 million,
$22.9 million and $5.4 million for fiscal years 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $204.1 million at September 30, 2007. If
we are unable to achieve and maintain profitability, the market
price for our stock may decline, perhaps substantially. We
cannot assure you that our revenue will grow or that we will
achieve or maintain profitability in the future. If we do not
achieve profitability, we may be required to raise additional
capital to maintain or grow our operations. The terms of any
transaction to raise additional capital, if available at all,
may be highly dilutive to existing investors or contain other
unfavorable terms, such as a high interest rate and restrictive
covenants.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of speech technologies.
The market for speech technologies is relatively new and rapidly
evolving. Our ability to increase revenue in the future depends
in large measure on acceptance of speech technologies in general
and our products in particular. The continued development of the
market for our current and future speech solutions will also
depend on:
Table of Contents
Sales of our speech products would be harmed if the market for
speech technologies does not continue to develop or develops
more slowly than we expect, and, consequently, our business
could be harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with
our investment in our speech technologies.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within speech, we compete with AT&T, IBM,
Microsoft, and other smaller providers. Within healthcare
dictation and transcription, we compete with eScription, Philips
Medical, Spheris and other smaller providers. Within imaging, we
compete directly with ABBYY, Adobe, eCopy, I.R.I.S. and NewSoft.
In speech, some of our partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify,
Genesys and Nortel develop and market products that can be
considered substitutes for our solutions. In addition, a number
of smaller companies in both speech and imaging produce
technologies or products that are in some markets competitive
with our solutions. Current and potential competitors have
established, or may establish, cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of
their technologies to address the needs of our prospective
customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, IBM and Microsoft, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as IBM and Microsoft, have developed
or acquired products or technologies that compete with our
products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected. Our success will depend substantially upon
our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new
products and features that meet changing customer requirements
and incorporate technological advancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
Our managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, as of
September 30, 2005, identified a material weakness in our
internal controls related to tax accounting, primarily as a
result of a lack of necessary corporate accounting resources and
ineffective execution of certain controls designed to prevent or
detect actual or potential misstatements in the tax accounts.
While we have taken remediation measures to correct this
material weakness, which measures are more fully described in
Item 9A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, we cannot
assure you that we will not have material weaknesses in our
internal controls in the future. Any failure in the
effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial
reporting could have a material adverse impact on our ability to
report our financial results in an accurate and timely manner.
Because we operate worldwide, our business is subject to risks
associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate
that revenue from international operations will increase in the
future. Reported international revenue,
Table of Contents
classified by the major geographic areas in which our customers
are located, represented approximately $130.4 million,
$100.2 million and $71.5 million, representing 22%,
26%, and 31% of our total revenue, respectively, for fiscal
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Most of our international
revenue is generated by sales in Europe and Asia. In addition,
some of our products are developed and manufactured outside the
United States. A significant portion of the development and
manufacturing of our speech products are completed in Belgium,
and a significant portion of our imaging research and
development is conducted in Hungary. In connection with prior
acquisitions we have added research and development resources in
Aachen, Germany, Montreal, Canada and Tel Aviv, Israel.
Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of
factors associated with international sales and operations,
including:
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates or declining economic conditions in these countries. In
certain circumstances, we have entered into forward exchange
contracts to hedge against foreign currency fluctuations on
intercompany balances with our foreign subsidiaries. We use
these contracts to reduce our risk associated with exchange rate
movements, as the gains or losses on these contracts are
intended to offset any exchange rate losses or gains on the
hedged transaction. We do not engage in foreign currency
speculation. Forward exchange contracts hedging firm commitments
qualify for hedge accounting when they are designated as a hedge
of the foreign currency exposure and they are effective in
minimizing such exposure. With our increased international
presence in a number of geographic locations and with
international revenue projected to increase, we are exposed to
changes in foreign currencies including the Euro, British Pound,
Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Israeli New Shekel, Indian Rupee
and the Hungarian Forint. Changes in the value of the Euro or
other foreign currencies relative to the value of the
U.S. dollar could adversely affect future revenue and
operating results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefit of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of identifiable intangible
assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment of such
assets, include the following:
Table of Contents
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified. As of September 30, 2007, we had
identified intangible assets amounting to approximately
$391.2 million and goodwill of approximately
$1.2 billion.
We are dependent on certain suppliers, including limited and
sole source suppliers, to provide key components used in our
healthcare-related products. We have experienced, and may
continue to experience, delays in component deliveries, which in
turn could cause delays in product shipments and require the
redesign of certain products. In addition, if we are unable to
procure necessary components under favorable purchase terms,
including at favorable prices and with the order lead-times
needed for the efficient and profitable operation of our
business, our results of operations could suffer.
If any of our key employees were to leave, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but may
not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel
in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate, motivate and
retain these employees could harm our business.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability to the Company. Although we have
systems and policies in place for safeguarding protected health
information from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and
policies may not preclude claims against us for alleged
violations of applicable requirements. There can be no assurance
that we will not be subject to liability claims that could have
a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Table of Contents
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to obtain, license, sell or otherwise
use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing
unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we may not be
able to protect our technology from unauthorized use.
Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
technologies that are substantially the same or superior to our
technologies and that do not infringe our rights. In these
cases, we would be unable to prevent our competitors from
selling or licensing these similar or superior technologies. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. Although the source code for our proprietary software is
protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work,
litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity
and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend
against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation,
regardless of the outcome, can be very expensive and can divert
management efforts.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
On November 9, 2007, Autotext Technologies, a subsidiary of
Acacia Research, filed an action against us in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The complaint
alleges that our T9 Predictive Text software infringes
U.S. Patent No. 5,305,205 entitled
Computer-assisted transcription apparatus. The
patent generally relates to a predictive word processing system,
where a list of word choices is presented when a user inputs
just a few letters of a word. Damages are sought in an
unspecified amount. Because the complaint was only filed
recently, we have not yet been able to assess the merits of the
claim or identify the defenses available to us.
On May 31, 2006, GTX Corporation filed an action against us
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas claiming patent infringement. Damages were sought in an
unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, GTX Corporation alleged that
we are infringing United States Patent No. 7,016,536
entitled Method and Apparatus for Automatic Cleaning and
Enhancing of Scanned Documents. We believe these claims have no
merit and intend to defend the action vigorously.
On November 27, 2002, AllVoice Computing plc filed an
action against us in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas claiming patent infringement. In the
lawsuit, AllVoice Computing plc alleges that we are infringing
United States Patent No. 5,799,273 entitled Automated
Proofreading Using Interface Linking Recognized Words to their
Audio Data While Text is Being Changed. Such patent
generally discloses techniques for manipulating audio data
associated with text generated by a speech recognition engine.
Although we have several products in the speech recognition
technology field, we believe that our products do not infringe
AllVoice Computing plcs patent because, in addition to
other defenses, we do not use the claimed techniques. Damages
are sought in an unspecified amount. We filed an Answer on
December 23, 2002. The United States District Court for
Table of Contents
the Southern District of Texas entered summary judgment against
AllVoice Computing plc and dismissed all claims against us on
February 21, 2006. AllVoice Computing plc filed a notice of
appeal from this judgment on April 26, 2006. On
October 12, 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the summary judgment. We
believe these claims have no merit and intend to defend the
action vigorously.
We believe that the final outcome of the current litigation
matters described above will not have a significant adverse
effect on our financial position and results of operations.
However, even if our defense is successful, the litigation could
require significant management time and could be costly. Should
we not prevail in these litigation matters, we may be unable to
sell and/or
license certain of our technologies which we consider to be
proprietary, and our operating results, financial position and
cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
On March 19, 2004,Warburg Pincus, a global private equity
firm agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of our stock held
by Xerox Corporation for approximately $80.0 million.
Additionally, on May 9, 2005 and September 15, 2005 we
sold shares of common stock, and warrants to purchase common
stock to Warburg Pincus for aggregate gross proceeds of
approximately $75.1 million. As of September 30, 2007,
Warburg Pincus beneficially owned approximately 21% of our
outstanding common stock, including warrants exercisable for up
to 7,066,538 shares of our common stock and
3,562,238 shares of our outstanding Series B Preferred
Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of our common
stock. As of September 30, 2007, Fidelity was our second
largest stockholder, owning approximately 7.0% of our common
stock. Because of their large holdings of our capital stock
relative to other stockholders, each of these two stockholders
acting individually, or together, have a strong influence over
matters requiring approval by our stockholders.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of the
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our two
largest stockholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could also contribute to the volatility or our stock
price. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these
factors may have on the market price of our common stock, these
factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant volatility in our stock price during any given
period of time. Moreover, companies that have experienced
volatility in the market price of their stock often are subject
to securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of
such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Table of Contents
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, new regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the rules of The Nasdaq Global Select
Market, are resulting in increased general and administrative
expenses for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. In
connection with past acquisitions, we issued a substantial
number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of such
acquisitions. In addition, in connection with the acquisitions
of Viecore, Vocada and Commissure and the issuance of shares of
our common stock in those transactions, we have agreed to
register the shares of our common stock issued for resale.
Approximately 7,300,000 shares of common stock have been
issued in these acquisitions. No prediction can be made as to
the effect, if any, that future sales of shares of common stock
or the availability of shares of common stock for future sale,
will have on the trading price of our common stock.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
None.
Table of Contents
Our corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and support functions occupy
approximately 105,000 square feet of space that we lease in
Burlington, Massachusetts. We also lease additional properties
in the United States and a number of foreign countries. The
following table summarizes our significant properties as of
September 30, 2007:
In addition to the properties referenced above, we also lease a
number of small sales and marketing offices in the United States
and internationally. As of September 30, 2007, we were
productively utilizing substantially all of the space in our
facilities, except for space identified above as
unoccupied or that has been subleased to third
parties.
Like many companies in the software industry, we have from time
to time been notified of claims that we may be infringing
certain intellectual property rights of others. These claims
have been referred to counsel, and they are in various stages of
evaluation and negotiation. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. There is no assurance that licenses will be offered by
all claimants, that the terms of any offered licenses will be
acceptable to us or that in all cases the dispute will be
resolved without litigation, which may be time consuming and
expensive, and may result in injunctive relief or the payment of
damages by us.
Table of Contents
On November 9, 2007, Autotext Technologies, a subsidiary of
Acacia Research, filed an action against us in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The complaint
alleges that our T9 Predictive Text software infringes
U.S. Patent No. 5,305,205 entitled
Computer-assisted transcription apparatus. The
patent generally relates to a predictive word processing system,
where a list of word choices is presented when a user inputs
just a few letters of a word. Damages are sought in an
unspecified amount. Because the complaint was only filed
recently, we have not yet been able to assess the merits of the
claim or identify the defenses available to us.
On May 31, 2006, GTX Corporation, or GTX, filed an action
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas claiming patent infringement. Damages were
sought in an unspecified amount. In the lawsuit, GTX alleged
that we are infringing United States Patent No. 7,016,536
entitled Method and Apparatus for Automatic Cleaning and
Enhancing of Scanned Documents. We believe the claims have
no merit and intend to defend the action vigorously.
On November 27, 2002, AllVoice Computing plc, or AllVoice,
filed an action against us in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas claiming patent infringement.
In the lawsuit, AllVoice alleges that the Company is infringing
United States Patent No. 5,799,273 entitled Automated
Proofreading Using Interface Linking Recognized Words to Their
Audio Data While Text Is Being Changed, or the 273 Patent.
The 273 Patent generally discloses techniques for manipulating
audio data associated with text generated by a speech
recognition engine. Although we have several products in the
speech recognition technology field, we believe that our
products do not infringe the 273 Patent because, in addition to
other defenses, they do not use the claimed techniques. Damages
are sought in an unspecified amount. We filed an Answer on
December 23, 2002. On January 4, 2005, the case was
transferred to a new judge of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas for administrative reasons.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas entered summary judgment against AllVoice and dismissed
all claims against Nuance on February 21, 2006. AllVoice
filed a notice of appeal from this judgment on April 26,
2006. On October 12, 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the summary
judgment. We believe these claims have no merit and intend to
defend the action vigorously.
In August 2001, the first of a number of complaints was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York, on behalf of a purported class of persons who
purchased Former Nuance stock between April 12, 2000 and
December 6, 2000. Those complaints have been consolidated
into one action. The complaint generally alleges that various
investment bank underwriters engaged in improper and undisclosed
activities related to the allocation of shares in Former
Nuances initial public offering of securities. The
complaint makes claims for violation of several provisions of
the federal securities laws against those underwriters, and also
against Former Nuance and some of the Former Nuances
directors and officers. Similar lawsuits, concerning more than
250 other companies initial public offerings, were filed
in 2001. In February 2003, the Court denied a motion to dismiss
with respect to the claims against Former Nuance. In the third
quarter of 2003, a proposed settlement in principle was reached
among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants (including Former
Nuance) and the issuers insurance carriers. The settlement
calls for the dismissal and release of claims against the issuer
defendants, including Former Nuance, in exchange for a
contingent payment to be paid, if necessary, by the issuer
defendants insurance carriers and an assignment of certain
claims. The timing of the conclusion of the settlement remains
unclear, and the settlement is subject to a number of
conditions, including approval of the Court. The settlement is
not expected to have any material impact upon us, as payments,
if any, are expected to be made by insurance carriers, rather
than by us. In July 2004, the underwriters filed a motion
opposing approval by the court of the settlement among the
plaintiffs, issuers and insurers. In March 2005, the court
granted preliminary approval of the settlement, subject to the
parties agreeing to modify the term of the settlement which
limits each underwriter from seeking contribution against its
issuer for damages it may be forced to pay in the action. On
April 24, 2006, the court held a fairness hearing in
connection with the motion for final approval of the settlement.
The court has yet to issue a ruling on the motion for final
approval. On December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit reversed the Courts order certifying a
class in several test cases that had been selected
by the underwriter defendants and plaintiffs in the coordinated
proceeding. The plaintiffs petitioned the Second Circuit for
rehearing of the Second Circuits decision, however, on
April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the petition for
rehearing. At a status conference on April 23, 2007, the
district court suggested that the issuers settlement could
not be approved in its present form, given the Second
Circuits ruling. On June 25, 2007 the district court
issued an order terminating the settlement
Table of Contents
agreement. The plaintiffs are due to submit amended complaints
and the issue of a new class definition for certification will
be heard. In the meantime, the issuer defendants are working to
reinstate the settlement agreement with the plaintiffs on
substantially the same terms. In the event the settlement is not
concluded, we intend to defend the litigation vigorously. We
believe we have meritorious defenses to the claims against
Former Nuance.
We believe that the final outcome of the current litigation
matters described above will not have a significant adverse
effect on our financial position or results of operations.
However, even if our defense is successful, the litigation could
require significant management time and will be costly. Should
we not prevail in these litigation matters, our operating
results, financial position and cash flows could be adversely
impacted.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders in the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol NUAN. The following table sets
forth, for our fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low sales
prices of our common stock, in each case as report on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market.
As of October 31, 2007, there were 931 stockholders of
record of our common stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The terms of our credit facility place restrictions on our
ability to pay dividends except for stock dividends.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
We have not announced any currently effective authorization to
repurchase shares of our common stock.
Table of Contents
On October 23, 2004, our Board of Directors approved a
change in the Companys fiscal year end from December 31 to
September 30, effective beginning September 30, 2004.
All references in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to fiscal 2004 refer to the nine month period ended
September 30, 2004. References to fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007, refer to the twelve month periods ended September 30.
References to fiscal 2003 and prior years refer to the twelve
month periods ended December 31.
The following selected consolidated financial data is not
necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The interim statement of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 is unaudited and, in the opinion of
management, reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of results
of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003
(i.e. amounts in millions, except per share dollars and
percentages):
Table of Contents
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
23
Table of Contents
This annual report contains forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if
they never materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause
our consolidated results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding:
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to
the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of
speech-based solutions for businesses and consumers worldwide.
Our speech solutions are designed to transform the way people
interact with information systems, mobile devices and services.
We have designed our solutions to make the user experience more
compelling, convenient, safe and satisfying, unlocking the full
potential of these systems, devices and services.
The vast improvements in the power and features of information
systems and mobile devices have increased their complexity and
reduced their ease of use. Many of the systems, devices and
services designed to make our lives easier are cumbersome to
use, involving complex touch-tone menus in call centers,
counterintuitive and inconsistent user interfaces on computers
and mobile devices, inefficient manual processes for
transcribing medical records and automobile dashboards overrun
with buttons and dials. These complex interfaces often limit the
ability of the average user to take full advantage of the
functionality and convenience offered by these products and
services. By using the spoken word, our speech solutions help
people naturally obtain information, interact with mobile
devices and access services such as navigation, online banking
and medical transcription.
We provide speech solutions to several rapidly growing markets:
Table of Contents
In addition to our speech offerings, we provide PDF and document
solutions that reduce the time and cost associated with
creating, using and sharing documents. Our solutions benefit
from the widespread adoption of the PDF format and the
increasing demand for networked solutions for managing
electronic documents. Our solutions are used by millions of
professionals and within large enterprises.
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative speech and imaging solutions for businesses and
organizations around the globe. We market and distribute our
products indirectly through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors, and directly through our dedicated
sales force and through our
e-commerce
website.
We have built a world-class portfolio of speech solutions both
through internal development and acquisitions. We continue to
pursue opportunities to broaden our speech solutions and expect
to continue to make acquisitions of other companies, businesses
and technologies to complement our internal investments. We have
a team that focuses on evaluating market needs and potential
acquisitions to fulfill them. In addition, we have a disciplined
methodology for integrating acquired companies and businesses
after the transaction is complete. Acquisitions completed in
recent years include the following significant transactions:
Table of Contents
These acquisitions have had a material impact on our results of
operations. Our results of operations for fiscal 2007 included
the operations of Dictaphone for a full year and partial year
results from our acquisitions of Mobile Voice Control, Focus,
BeVocal, VoiceSignal, Tegic and Commissure. We refer to these
transactions collectively as our 2007 acquisitions. Our results
of operations during fiscal 2006 included the operations of
Former Nuance for a full year and the operations of Dictaphone
for six months. We refer to these transactions together as our
2006 acquisitions. Our fiscal 2005 results included only two
weeks of the operations of Former Nuance and partial year
results from our acquisitions of Phonetic as well as Rhetorical
Systems, Inc., ART Advanced Recognition Technologies, Inc. and
MedRemote, Inc. As you review our year over year results of
operations described below, you will note that these
acquisitions represent a significant factor in the increase in
our revenue and expenses.
Table of Contents
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenue,
certain selected financial data for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
The following table shows total revenue by geographic location,
based on the location of our customers, in absolute dollars and
percentage change (dollars in millions):
Table of Contents
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
In fiscal 2007 total revenue increased $213.5 million
primarily due to $127.2 million of revenue related to our
2007 acquisitions and organic revenue growth of
$86.3 million, or 22%, from fiscal 2006, including a 19%
increase in network revenue, a 27% increase in dictation
revenue, a 36% increase in embedded revenue, and a 2% increase
in imaging revenue.
Based on the location of the customers, the geographic split in
fiscal 2007 was 78% of total revenue in the United States and
22% internationally as compared to 74% of total revenue in the
United States and 26% internationally in fiscal 2006. The
increase in proportion of revenue generated in the United States
was primarily due to our 2007 acquisitions which have a higher
proportion of their revenue derived from customers in the United
States.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
In fiscal 2006 total revenue increased $156.1 million due
to $112.4 million of revenue related to our 2006
acquisitions and organic growth of $43.7 million, or 19%,
from fiscal 2005 including a 20% increase in network revenue, a
25% increase in dictation revenue, primarily as a result of the
release of Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9.0 in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, a 37% increase in embedded
revenue and a 6% increase in imaging revenue.
Based on the location of the customers, the geographic split in
fiscal 2006 was 74% of total revenue in the United States and
26% internationally as compared to 69% of total revenue in the
United States and 31% internationally in fiscal 2005. The
increase in proportion of revenue generated in the United States
was primarily due to 2006 acquisitions which have a high
proportion of their revenue derived from customers in the United
States.
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our speech and imaging products and technology. The
following table shows product and licensing revenue, in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Product and licensing revenue in fiscal 2007 increased
$76.0 million compared to fiscal 2006 due to
$29.8 million of revenue attributable to our 2007
acquisitions and organic revenue growth of $46.2 million,
or 20%, from fiscal 2006. Due to a change in revenue mix,
primarily relating to the accelerated growth of professional
services, subscription and hosting revenue, product and
licensing revenue decreased by 8.9 percentage points of
total revenue as compared to fiscal 2006.
Speech related product and licensing revenue increased
$74.9 million, or 46%, from fiscal 2006. Excluding revenue
related to our 2007 acquisitions, speech related product and
licensing revenue grew $45.1 million or 28% from fiscal
2006. Included in this organic growth, network revenue increased
14%, dictation revenue increased 26% and embedded revenue
increased 49%. The growth in organic speech revenue resulted
from increased sales of our legacy network products, sustained
performance of our embedded products in automotive, handsets,
and personal navigation devices as well as increased sales in
dictation fueled by our fourth quarter 2006 release of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking 9.0.
Table of Contents
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Product and licensing revenue in fiscal 2006 increased
$64.6 million as compared to fiscal 2005 due to
$39.8 million of revenue attributable to our 2006
acquisitions and organic revenue growth of $24.8 million,
up 15% from fiscal 2005. Due to a change in revenue mix, driven
primarily by the growth of maintenance and support revenue,
product and licensing revenue as a percentage of total revenue
decreased by 13.0 percentage points as compared to fiscal
2005.
Speech related product and licensing revenue increased
$59.4 million or 57% from fiscal 2006, growing to 70% of
total product and licensing revenue in fiscal 2006 from 60% in
fiscal 2005. Excluding revenue related to our 2006 acquisitions,
speech related product and licensing revenue increased
$19.6 million, or 19%, from fiscal 2005. The growth in
organic speech revenue resulted from increased sales of our
legacy network products, embedded products in automotive and
handsets, as well as increased sales in dictation fueled by our
fourth quarter release of Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9.0.
Product and licensing revenue from our imaging products
increased $5.2 million, or 8%.
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for speech customers.
Subscription and hosting revenue primarily relates to delivering
hosted and
on-site
directory assistance and transcription and dictation services
over a specified term. The following table shows professional
services, subscription and hosting revenue, in absolute dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Professional services, subscription and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2007 increased $84.2 million compared to fiscal 2006 due
to $58.5 million of revenue from our 2007 acquisitions and
organic revenue growth of $25.7 million, or 32% from fiscal
2006. The organic growth is due primarily to 22% growth in
network professional services based on increasing demand for our
core network consulting and transactional directory assistance
services and a 34% growth in our Dictaphone iChart solution.
Additionally, our healthcare professional services, largely
based on our acquisition of Dictaphone in March 2006, provided
revenue growth of 45% in the second half of fiscal 2007 relative
to the second half of fiscal 2006. As a percentage of total
revenue, professional services, subscription and hosting revenue
increased 6.6% due to accelerated organic and acquisition
related growth as compared to the growth of product and license
revenue and maintenance and support revenue.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Professional services, subscription and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2006 increased $34.0 million as compared to fiscal
2005 due to $22.1 million of revenue from our 2006
acquisitions and $11.9 million from organic revenue growth
as compared to the fiscal 2005 base. Network services, excluding
revenue attributable to fiscal 2006 acquisitions, provided
$9.0 million, or 25% growth, based on growth in core
network consulting and training revenue.
Table of Contents
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance service for our speech products
including network, embedded and dictation and transcription
products. The following table shows maintenance and support
revenue, in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2007 increased
$53.2 million as compared to fiscal 2006, with
$38.9 million of this increase due to our 2007
acquisitions, which have a significant customer base of
maintenance and support contracts and organic revenue growth of
$14.4 million, or 20%, as compared to fiscal 2006. Organic
revenue growth was principally in maintenance and support for
network services. As a percentage of total revenue, maintenance
and support revenue grew 2.3 percentage points in fiscal 2007
due primarily due to our 2007 acquisitions.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2006 increased
$57.5 million as compared to fiscal 2005.
$50.5 million of this increase is due to our 2006
acquisitions, which have a significant customer base of
maintenance and support contracts from historic sales of
products and $7.0 million, or 50%, organic growth in fiscal
2006 compared to fiscal 2005, due to our continued strong
renewal rates as well as from new sales in our network products.
As a percentage of total revenue, maintenance and support
revenue grew 12.4 percentage points in fiscal 2006 because of
significant increase due to 2006 acquisitions.
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs, and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue, in absolute dollars
and as a percentage of product and licensing revenue (dollars in
millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Cost of product and licensing revenue increased
$13.5 million for fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006
due in large part to our 2007 acquisitions and increased
royalties and fulfillment of certain productivity products. As a
percentage of revenue, cost of revenue and licensing revenue
increased slightly due to the higher third-party hardware cost
and royalties associated with products acquired through our 2007
acquisitions.
Table of Contents
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2006 increased
$9.3 million as compared to fiscal 2005 primarily due to
costs relating to our 2006 acquisitions. As a percentage of
product and licensing revenue, cost of product and licensing
revenue increased slightly in fiscal 2006, largely due to our
2006 acquisitions products that have higher cost of goods
sold relative to our other products. The added costs of goods
sold for the acquired products are primarily due to third-party
hardware that is included in the solutions licensed to customers.
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue
primarily consists of compensation for consulting personnel,
outside consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our subscription and hosted
solutions. The following table shows cost of revenue, in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue (dollars in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue
increased $51.4 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal
2006 due primarily to $39.4 million of incremental cost related
to our 2007 acquisitions. Cost of professional services,
subscription and hosting revenue in our organic business
increased $12.1 million, or 19% as compared to the 2006 base, on
32% organic revenue growth. This significant improvement for the
organic business was largely as a result of our ability to
increase the utilization of existing resources in our healthcare
and network professional service teams which drove an increase
of 8.2 percentage points in gross margin for the professional
services, subscription and hosting revenue.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting revenue
increased $28.1 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to
fiscal 2005 primarily due to $14.9 million of costs due to
our 2006 acquisitions, which have professional services
organizations to support their revenue including the Dictaphone
subscription-based licensing and hosted application customer
base. The 80.6% growth in costs supports the 71.9% growth in
related revenue for fiscal 2006. Cost of professional services
as a percentage of the revenue, excluding share-based payments
which changed $1.8 million, improved 2.9% as synergies were
realized from the merging of the service teams from our 2006
acquisitions. These improvements were offset partially by
increased expenses for the subscription and hosting services.
Table of Contents
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue,
in absolute dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and
support revenue (dollars in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Cost of maintenance and support revenue increased
$11.9 million as compared to fiscal 2006 due to
$8.5 million related to our 2007 acquisitions and the cost
of maintenance and support revenue for our organic business
increased $3.3 million, or 21% as compared to the 2006
base. Cost of maintenance and support revenue as a percentage of
revenue stayed relatively flat at 22%, as maintenance and
support revenue and associated costs grew approximately 76% from
fiscal 2006.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of maintenance and support revenue increased
$10.7 million compared to fiscal 2005. As a percentage of
maintenance and support revenue, cost of revenue decreased 13.7
percentage points in fiscal 2006 to 21.9%. This decrease in
percentage is primarily attributable to lower costs relative to
the revenue in our speech business, including our healthcare
maintenance and support business following our acquisition of
Dictaphone and also in areas other than speech due to synergies
we realized upon the combination of pre-existing and acquired
product lines following our acquisition of Former Nuance.
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets consists
of the amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology using the straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible
assets periodically or whenever events or changes in business
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our intangible
assets may not be recoverable. The following table shows cost of
revenue from amortization of intangible assets, in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets increased
$0.2 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. The
increase was primarily attributable to $3.1 million in
amortization of intangible assets related to our 2007
acquisitions offset by a fiscal 2006 non-recurring charge of
$2.6 million to write down technology licensed from a third
party to its net realizable value. As a percentage of revenue,
cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets declined
from 3.3% to 2.2% largely because of a non-recurring charge in
fiscal 2006 as well as the effect of amortization expense over a
larger revenue base.
Table of Contents
Based on the amortizable intangible assets as of
September 30, 2007, and assuming no impairment or reduction
in expected lives, we expect cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets for fiscal 2008 to be $19.1 million.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets increased
$3.7 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The
increase was primarily attributable to the $4.4 million in
amortization of intangible assets relating to our 2006
acquisitions and $0.4 million incremental expense resulting
from amortization of the December 2006 settlement and license
from z4 Technologies, Inc. In addition, during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that we would not make
additional investments to support a technology licensed from a
non-related third-party in 2003. As a result, we revised the
cash flow estimates related to the purchased technology and
recorded an additional $2.6 million in cost of revenue to
write down the purchased technology to its net realizable value.
These increases were offset in part by the cessation of the
amortization of technology and patents that was established in
connection with our acquisitions consummated in 1999 and 2000 as
they were fully amortized.
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries
and benefits and overhead relating to our engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense, in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars
in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Research and development expense increased $20.6 million in
fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 due to an increase of
$8.6 million in compensation expense due to increased
headcount largely associated with our 2007 acquisitions, an
additional $6.9 million for contract labor and professional
services to support ongoing research and development projects
and an additional $2.6 million of increased shared-based
payment expense. To date, we have not capitalized any internal
development costs as the cost incurred after technological
feasibility but before release of products has not been
significant. The remaining increase relates to additional
employee-related travel, entertainment and infrastructure
expenses. While increasing in absolute dollars, research and
development expense continued to decrease as a proportion of
total revenue reflecting achievement of synergies following
acquisitions and on-going efforts to increase productivity.
We believe that the development of new products and the
enhancement of existing products are essential to our success.
Accordingly, we plan to continue to invest in research and
development activities at approximately the same percentage of
revenue in fiscal 2008.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Research and development expense increased $20.2 million in
fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 due to a $10.7 million
increase in compensation related expense due to increased
headcount largely resulting from our 2006 acquisitions and an
increase of $4.3 million relating to share-based payments.
The remaining increase was attributable to an increase in other
headcount related expenses, including travel and infrastructure
related expenses as we continued to invest in our products.
While continuing to increase in absolute dollars, research and
development expense has decreased relative to our total revenue.
This decrease in expense as a percentage of total revenue
reflects synergies following previous acquisitions.
Table of Contents
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshows and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense, in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars
in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Sales and marketing expense increased $56.5 million in
fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006 due to an increase of
$35.0 million in salaries and other variable costs, such as
commissions and travel expenses relating to increased headcount
from our 2007 acquisitions and to support the organic business,
an increase of $13.0 million relating to share-based
compensation, and an increase of $4.2 million relating to
marketing programs and channel program expenses. The remaining
increase in expenses relates to employee-related travel,
temporary and professional services, recruiting and other
expenses associated with the support of the sales and marketing
organization. While the expenses increased in absolute dollars,
sales and marketing expenses continued to decrease as a
percentage of total revenue due to synergies achieved from
acquisitions and increased productivity of sales organization.
We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute
dollars as we continue to pursue our strategic goals but remain
relatively consistent as a percentage of revenue in fiscal 2008.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Sales and marketing expense increased $49.6 million in
fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 due to a
$30.1 million increase in our 2006 acquisitions and
continued investment in the sales force for our existing
products, an increase of $6.4 million relating to
share-based payments and a $7.8 million increase in
marketing expenses primarily to support new product releases
made during fiscal 2006 as well as marketing expenses associated
with products acquired as part of our 2006 acquisitions. While
the expense in absolute dollars increased, sales and marketing
expense as a percentage of revenue decreased as we achieved
higher sales volumes while controlling our cost structure.
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs, (including overhead), for administration,
finance, human resources, information systems, facilities and
general management, fees for external professional advisors
including accountants and attorneys, insurance, and provisions
for doubtful accounts. The following table shows general and
administrative expense, in absolute dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (dollars in millions):
Table of Contents
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
General and administrative expense increased $20.3 million
in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006 due to increased
compensation associated with our 2007 acquisitions, an increase
of $8.4 million relating to share-based compensation, and a
$4.0 million increase in expenses relating to temporary
employees and professional services to support our growing
organization. While expenses increased in absolute dollars, the
expenses have decreased as a percent of total revenue primarily
as we have realized synergies from the integration of general
and administrative organizations of acquired companies into our
general and administrative organization.
We expect general and administrative expense to continue to
increase in absolute dollars but decrease slightly as a
percentage of revenue as we continue to achieve synergies of
scale.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
General and administrative expense increased $23.3 million
in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. Our 2006 acquisitions
contributed $7.8 million of this increase, including
$3.0 million paid to Dictaphone staff for non-recurring
activities necessary to transition knowledge and processes
post-acquisition. General and administrative expense, excluding
those related to our 2006 acquisitions, increased
$15.5 million due primarily to compensation for increased
employees and external contractors in the finance, human
resources, legal and other general and administrative functions.
This increase in spending on staff and contractors was related
to our need to comply with new regulations, such as the
implementation of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2006. These new
initiatives were partially offset by a reduction in overall
costs for staffing and contractors needed to comply with the
provisions of Sarbanes Oxley in fiscal 2006. While the expense
increased in absolute dollars, general and administrative
expense as a percentage of revenue decreased as we achieved
higher sales volumes while controlling our cost structure.
Amortization of other intangible assets into operating expense
includes amortization of acquired customer and contractual
relationships, non-competition agreements and acquired trade
names and trademarks. Customer relationships are amortized on an
accelerated basis based upon the pattern in which the economic
benefit of customer relationships are being utilized. Other
identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. We evaluate these
assets for impairment and for appropriateness of their remaining
life on an ongoing basis. The following table shows amortization
of other intangible assets, in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Amortization of intangible assets increased $7.4 million in
fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. The increase was
primarily attributable to $10.6 million in amortization of
intangible assets related to our 2007 acquisitions. Customer
relationships compose the majority of the intangible assets
amortized to operating expense, and are amortized to expense
based upon patterns in which the economic benefits are expected
to be utilized. Based on these patterns, the amortization
relating to certain of our acquisitions consummated in fiscal
2006 acquisitions and before, was less in fiscal 2007 than in
fiscal 2006. This decrease partially offset the increase from
our 2007 acquisitions.
Based on the amortizable intangible assets as of
September 30, 2007, and assuming no impairment or reduction
in expected lives, we expect cost of revenue from amortization
of intangible assets for fiscal 2008 to be $49.5 million.
Table of Contents
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Amortization of intangible assets increased $13.2 million
in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 largely attributable
to the $10.8 million of amortization of identifiable
intangible assets related to our 2006 acquisitions and full year
amortization relating to our fiscal 2005 acquisitions.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we recorded a
$1.3 million reduction to existing restructuring reserves
as a result of the execution of a favorable sublease agreement
relating to one of the facilities included in our 2005
restructuring plan. The amount was partially offset by other net
adjustments of $0.1 million associated with prior
years restructuring programs.
In fiscal 2005, we incurred restructuring charges of
$7.2 million. The charges were related to the elimination
of ten employees during the first quarter of 2006, a plan of
restructuring relative to certain of our facilities in June
2005, and a September 2005 plan of restructuring to eliminate
additional facilities and a reduction of approximately
40 employees in connection with our acquisition of Former
Nuance. The facilities charges included $0.2 million
related to the write-down of leasehold improvements based on
their net book value relative to the fair market value for their
shortened lives. The reduction in personnel was primarily from
the research and development and sales and marketing teams, and
was based on the elimination of redundancies resulting from our
acquisition of Former Nuance.
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in
millions):
The following table shows other income (expense), net in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars
in millions):
Table of Contents
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Interest income increased $2.7 million in fiscal 2007, as
compared to fiscal 2006, primarily due to higher cash and
investment balances during fiscal 2007 as well as higher
interest rates. Interest expense increased $18.9 million
during fiscal 2007, as compared to fiscal 2006, primarily due to
(i) interest related to the credit facility we entered into
on March 31, 2006 having been outstanding for a full
12 months; (ii) the April 2007 and August 2007
amendments to that facility that added $90.0 million and
$225.0 million of debt, respectively; and (iii) the
$250.0 million convertible debentures that we issued in
August 2007. Additionally, we have recorded $4.6 million of
non-cash interest expense mainly related to imputed interest in
association with certain lease obligations included in our
accrued business combination costs and accrued restructuring
charges, the amortization of debt issuance costs associated with
the credit facility we entered into on March 31, 2006 as
well as to the accretion of the interest related to the note
payable from our Phonetic acquisition in February 2005. Other
income (expense) principally consisted of foreign exchange gains
(losses) as a result of the changes in foreign exchange rates on
certain of our foreign subsidiaries who have transactions
denominated in currencies other than their functional
currencies, as well as the translation of certain of our
intercompany balances.
We expect interest expense to increase during fiscal 2008,
relative to fiscal 2007, as we pay interest on the 2006 credit
facility, as amended, as well as on the new convertible
debentures, and as we amortize the debt issuance costs and debt
discount for the full year as compared to the partial year
during which these items were outstanding in fiscal 2007. We
will continue to record interest expense as it relates to
certain lease obligations included in our accrued restructuring
and accrued business combination costs.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Interest income increased $2.1 million in fiscal 2006, as
compared to fiscal 2005, primarily due to higher cash and
investment balances during fiscal 2006, as compared to the prior
year, and to a lesser degree to greater yields on our cash and
investments. Interest expense increased $16.0 million
during fiscal 2006, as compared to fiscal 2005, mainly due to
$12.2 million of interest expense paid quarterly on the
credit facility we entered into on March 31, 2006. Other
income (expense) principally consisted of foreign exchange gains
(losses) as a result of the changes in foreign exchange rates on
certain of our foreign subsidiaries whose operations are
denominated in other than their local currencies, as well as the
translation of certain of our intercompany balances.
The following table shows the provision for income taxes, in
absolute dollars and the effective income tax rate (in
thousands, except percentages):
The variance from the federal statutory rate in all periods was
due primarily to the increase in our valuation allowance with
respect to certain deferred tax assets. Valuation allowances
have been established for the U.S. net deferred tax asset,
which we believe do not meet the more likely than
not realization criteria established by SFAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. Due to a history of
cumulative losses in the United States, a full valuation
allowance has been recorded against the net deferred assets of
our U.S. entities. At September 30, 2007, we had a
valuation allowance for U.S. net deferred tax assets of
approximately $298.5 million. The U.S. net deferred
tax assets is composed of tax assets primarily related to net
operating loss carryforwards (resulting both from business
combinations and from operations) and tax credits, offset by
deferred tax liabilities primarily related to intangible assets.
Certain of these intangible assets have indefinite lives, and
the resulting deferred tax liability
Table of Contents
associated with these assets is not allowed as an offset to our
deferred tax assets for purposes of determining the required
amount of our valuation allowance.
Our utilization of deferred tax assets that were acquired in a
business combination (primarily net operating loss
carryforwards) will require the reversal of the deferred tax
asset in accordance with the manner in which the deferred tax
asset was originally recorded and will vary based upon the
business combination whose deferred tax assets are being
utilized. Our establishment of new deferred tax assets as a
result of operating activities requires the establishment of
valuation allowances based upon the SFAS 109 more
likely than not realization criteria. The establishment of
a valuation allowance relating to operating activities is
recorded as an increase to tax expense.
Our tax provision also includes state and foreign tax expense,
which is determined on either a legal entity or separate tax
jurisdiction basis.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $184.3 million as of
September 30, 2007, an increase of $72.0 million
compared to $112.3 million as of September 30, 2006.
In addition, we had $2.6 million of marketable securities
as of September 30, 2007. We completed fiscal 2007 with
working capital of $164.9 million as compared to
$51.3 million at the end of fiscal 2006. As of
September 30, 2007, total retained deficit was
$204.1 million. We do not expect our retained deficit to
impact our future ability to operate given our strong cash and
financial position. Our increase in cash and cash equivalents
was composed of $106.4 million provided by operating
activities, partially offset by the net impact of cash provided
by financing activities and cash used in investing activities.
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2007 was
$106.4 million, an increase of $44.4 million, or 72%,
from $62.0 million provided by operating activities in
fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily composed of changes
relating to the net loss after adding back non-cash items such
as depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation.
In fiscal 2007 this amount was $100.9 million compared to
$53.2 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of
$47.8 million, or 90%. This increase in fiscal 2007 was
augmented by changes in working capital accounts of
$5.5 million, which was composed primarily of a
$24.1 million increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses, offset by a $14.2 million increase in accounts
receivable. The increase in accounts receivable represents a 13%
increase as compared to the September 30, 2006 balance of
$110.8 million, while the accounts payable and accrued
expenses represent a 30% increase to the September 30, 2006
balance of $80.4 million. Each of the accounts receivable
and the accounts payable and accrued expenses grew in support of
our business which grew considerably in fiscal 2007, with
revenue increasing 55% as compared to fiscal 2006.
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2006 was
$62.0 million, an increase of $45.8 million, or 283%,
from $16.2 million provided by operating activities in
fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily composed of changes
relating to the net loss after adding back non-cash items such
as depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation.
In fiscal 2006 this amount was $53.2 million compared to
$21.8 million in fiscal 2005, an increase of
$31.4 million, or 144%. This increase in the comparable
annual periods was offset by net changes to working capital
accounts of $14.4 million.
Beginning in fiscal 2006, SFAS 123R requires the benefits
of tax deductions in excess of the tax-affected compensation
that would have been recognized as if we had always accounted
for our share-based compensation activity under SFAS 123R
to be reported as a cash flow from financing activities, rather
than as a cash flow from operating activities, as was prescribed
under accounting rules applicable through fiscal 2005. Under
SFAS 123R, these excess tax benefits from share-based
compensation activity generated in 2007 and 2006, are reported
as a cash flow from financing activities with an offsetting cash
flow used in operating activities. The benefits of tax
deductions in excess of the tax-affected compensation could
fluctuate significantly from period to period based on the
number of share-based compensation exercised, sold or vested,
the tax benefit realized and the tax-affected compensation
recognized.
Table of Contents
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2007 was
$577.7 million, an increase of $207.5 million, or 56%,
as compared to $370.2 million for fiscal 2006. The increase
in cash used in investing was primarily driven by a
$171.5 million increase in cash paid relating to our
acquisitions. In fiscal 2007 we paid, net of cash assumed and
including cash paid and held in escrow, $564.3 million
relating to certain of our acquisitions, as compared to
$392.8 million in fiscal 2006. Our purchases of property
and equipment and fees paid to defend our intellectual property
each increased in fiscal 2007 relative to fiscal 2006,
collectively using $20.2 million in fiscal 2007 as compared
to $12.6 million in fiscal 2006, using an additional
$7.5 million in cash. In fiscal 2007 we generated
$28.6 million less cash from maturities of marketable
securities and removal of encumbrances against certain
restricted cash balances, as we generated $6.7 million and
$35.3 million during fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The decrease in cash provided from marketable securities and
restricted cash was the result of most of our investments and
restricted cash having been converted to cash and cash
equivalents during fiscal 2006.
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2006 was
$370.2 million, an increase of $325.6 million, or
730%, as compared to $44.6 million for fiscal 2005. The
increase in cash used in investing was primarily driven by an
increase of $331.5 million in cash paid for our
acquisitions, of which the majority of the fiscal 2006 payments
related to our acquisition of Dictaphone on March 31, 2006,
and $8.3 million of the increase related to incremental
purchases of property and equipment and fees paid to defend our
intellectual property. The increase in cash used in investing
activities was partially offset by an incremental
$11.1 million cash generated from removal of encumbrances
on restricted cash and $3.1 million of incremental
maturities of marketable securities.
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2007 was
$541.5 million, an increase of $192.8 million, or 55%,
as compared to $348.7 million in fiscal 2006. The increase
in cash provided by financing activities is primarily related to
$205.4 million of incremental net borrowings from our
Expanded 2006 Credit Facility and 2.75% Convertible Senior
Debentures. This increase in cash generated was partially offset
by $4.5 million additional payments of notes and payables
and capital leases, $4.2 million in additional deferred
acquisition payments, $3.2 million for repurchase of shares
originally issued to the former shareholders of Mobile Voice
Control, Inc., incremental $1.1 million purchases of
additional treasury stock and $2.3 million less cash
generated for proceeds from issuance of common stock under
employee share-based compensation plans.
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2006 was
$348.7 million, an increase of $272.3 million compared
to $76.5 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in cash
provided by financing activities was primarily driven by
$346.0 million net proceeds from the new credit facility we
entered into in March 2006. Additionally, the proceeds from the
issuance of common stock under employee based compensation plans
increased $24.6 million, or 397%. These increases were
partially offset by $73.9 million in net proceeds from the
issuance of common stock under private placements that occurred
in fiscal 2005 and deferred acquisition payments of
$14.4 million made in fiscal 2006 related to our
acquisition of ART.
On August 13, 2007, Nuance issued $250 million of
2.75% convertible senior debentures due in 2027 (the 2027
Debentures) in a private placement to Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (the
Initial Purchasers). Total proceeds, net of debt
discount of $7.5 million and deferred debt issuance costs
of $1.1 million, to us were $241.4 million. The 2027
Debentures bear an interest rate of 2.75% per annum, payable
semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 15, 2008,
and mature on August 15, 2027 subject to the right of the
holders of the 2027 Debentures to require us to redeem the 2007
Debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. The related
debt discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized to
interest expense using the effective interest rate method
through August 2014. As of September 30, 2007, the ending
unamortized deferred financing fees were $1.1 million and
are included in other assets in our accompanying balance sheet.
The 2027 Debentures are general senior unsecured obligations,
ranking equally in right of payment to all of our existing and
future unsecured, unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in
right of payment to any indebtedness that is contractually
subordinated to the 2027
Table of Contents
Debentures. The 2027 Debentures are effectively subordinated to
our secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the
collateral securing such indebtedness and are structurally
subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities of our
subsidiaries. If converted, the principal amount of the 2027
Debentures is payable in cash and any amounts payable in excess
of the principal of $250 million, based on an initial
conversion rate, which represents an initial conversion price of
$19.47 per share, subject to adjustment as defined, will be paid
in cash or shares of our common stock, at our election, only in
the following circumstances and to the following extent:
(i) on any date during any fiscal quarter beginning after
September 30, 2007 (and only during such fiscal quarter) if
the closing sale price of our common stock was more than 120% of
the then current conversion price for at least 20 trading days
in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
last trading day of the previous fiscal quarter;
(ii) during the five consecutive
business-day
period following any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price for $1,000 principal amount of
the Debentures for each day during such five
trading-day
period was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common
stock multiplied by the then current conversion rate;
(iii) upon the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as described in the indenture for the 2027
Debentures; and (iv) at the option of the holder at any
time on or after February 15, 2027. Additionally, we may
redeem the 2027 Debentures, in whole or in part, on or after
August 20, 2014 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest;
each holder shall have the right, at such holders option,
to require us to repurchase all or any portion of the 2027
Debentures held by such holder on August 15, 2014,
August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2022. Upon conversion,
we will pay cash and shares of our common stock (or, at our
election, cash in lieu of some or all of such common stock), if
any. If we undergo a fundamental change (as described in the
indenture for the 2027 Debentures) prior to maturity, holders
will have the option to require us to repurchase all or any
portion of their debentures for cash at a price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the debentures to be purchased plus any
accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest
to, but excluding, the repurchase date. As of September 30,
2007, no conversion triggers were met. If the conversion
triggers were met, we could be required to repay all or some of
the principal amount in cash prior to the maturity date.
We have entered into a credit facility which consists of a
$75 million revolving credit line including letters of
credit, a $355 million term loan entered into on
March 31, 2006, a $90 million term loan entered into
on April 5, 2007 and a $225 million term loan entered
into on August 24, 2007 (the Expanded 2006 Credit
Facility). The term loans are due March 2013 and the
revolving credit line is due March 2012. As of
September 30, 2007, $663.7 million remained
outstanding under the term loans and there were
$17.4 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line. There were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
The Expanded 2006 Credit Facility contains covenants, including,
among other things, covenants that restrict the ability of us
and our subsidiaries to incur certain additional indebtedness,
create or permit liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback
transactions, make loans or investments, sell assets, make
certain acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock. The
agreement also contains events of default, including failure to
make payments of principal or interest, failure to observe
covenants, breaches of representations and warranties, defaults
under certain other material indebtedness, failure to satisfy
material judgments, a change of control and certain insolvency
events. As of September 30, 2007, we were in compliance
with the covenants under the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility bear interest
at a rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at our option,
either (a) the base rate (which is the higher of the
corporate base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal
funds rate plus 0.50% per annum) or (b) LIBOR (equal to
(i) the British Bankers Association Interest
Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars divided by
(ii) one minus the statutory reserves applicable to such
borrowing). The applicable margin for term loan borrowings under
the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility ranges from 0.75% to 1.50% per
annum with respect to base rate borrowings and from 1.75% to
2.50% per annum with respect to LIBOR-based borrowings,
depending on our leverage ratio. The applicable margin for
revolving loan borrowings, under the Expanded 2006 Credit
Facility ranges from 0.50% to 1.25% per annum with respect to
base rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.25% per annum with
respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon our leverage
ratio. As of September 30, 2007, our applicable margin for
term loan was 0.75% for base rate borrowings and 2.00% for
LIBOR-based borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee
for unutilized commitments
Table of Contents
under the revolving credit facility at a rate ranging from
0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our leverage ratio. As of
September 30, 2007, the commitment fee rate was 0.375% and
the interest rate was 7.13%.
We capitalized debt issuance costs related to the Expanded 2006
Credit Facility and are amortizing the costs to interest expense
using the effective interest rate method through March 2012 for
costs associated with the revolving credit facility and through
March 2013 for costs associated with the term loan. As of
September 30, 2007, the ending unamortized deferred
financing fees were $12.3 million and are included in other
assets in our accompanying balance sheet.
The credit facility is subject to repayment in four equal
quarterly installments of 1% per annum ($6.7 million per
year, not including interest, which is also payable quarterly),
and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined in the Expanded
2006 Credit Facility, which is first payable beginning in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008, based on the excess cash flow
generated in fiscal 2007. Any term loan borrowings not paid
through the baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or
any other mandatory or optional payments that we may make, will
be repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments are
made, the annual aggregate principal amount of the term loans
repaid would be as follows (in millions):
Our obligations under the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility are
unconditionally guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions,
each of our existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries. The Expanded 2006 Credit Facility and the
guarantees thereof are secured by first priority liens and
security interests in the following: 100% of the capital stock
of substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the
outstanding voting equity interests and 100% of the non-voting
equity interests of first-tier foreign subsidiaries, all
material tangible and intangible assets of us and the
guarantors, and any present and future intercompany debt. The
Expanded 2006 Credit Facility also contains provisions for
mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans upon receipt of
the following, and subject to certain exceptions: 100% of net
cash proceeds from asset sales, 100% of net cash proceeds from
issuance or incurrence of debt, and 100% of extraordinary
receipts. We may voluntarily prepay borrowings under the
Expanded 2006 Credit Facility without premium or penalty other
than breakage costs, as defined with respect to LIBOR-based
loans.
As noted above, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008,
we may be required to annually repay a portion of the
outstanding principal under the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility in
accordance with the excess cash flow sweep provision, as defined
in the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility. There is no payment in the
first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2008 under the excess cash flow
sweep provision of the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility.
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and marketable securities on hand will be sufficient to
meet our working capital, investing, financing and contractual
obligations and the contingent payments for acquisitions, if any
are realized, as they become due for the foreseeable future. We
also believe that in the event future operating results are not
as planned, that we could take actions, including restructuring
actions and other cost reduction initiatives, to reduce
operating expenses to levels which, in combination with expected
future revenue, will continue to generate sufficient operating
cash flow. In the event that these actions are not effective in
generating operating cash flows we may be required to issue
equity or debt securities on terms that may be less favorable.
Table of Contents
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
Contractual
Obligations
The following table outlines our contractual payment obligations
as of September 30, 2007 (in millions):
On November 2, 2007, we completed our acquisition of
Vocada, Inc., a developer of software applications to complement
certain of our healthcare solutions. The announced estimated
aggregate consideration for this
Table of Contents
acquisition is approximately 0.9 million shares of our
common stock, and a contingent payment of up to an additional
$21.0 million in cash or shares of our common stock, at our
election, based on the acquired business achieving certain
performance targets through 2010.
On November 26, 2007, we completed our acquisition of
Viecore, Inc. The Viecore acquisition will expand our
professional services capabilities. The announced estimated
aggregate consideration for this acquisition will be
approximately 5.0 million shares of our common stock, and a
payment of approximately $9.5 million in cash, including
0.6 million shares of stock to be placed into escrow, in
connection with certain standard representations and warranties.
The cash requirements of this acquisition were funded out of our
cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2007.
In connection with our acquisition of Phonetic, we agreed to
make contingent earnout payments of up to $35.0 million
upon the achievement of certain established financial and
performance targets through December 31, 2007, in
accordance with the purchase agreement. We have notified the
former shareholders of Phonetic that the performance targets for
the scheduled payments for calendar 2005 and 2006, totaling
$24.0 million, were not achieved. The former shareholders
of Phonetic have objected to this determination. We are
currently in discussions with the former shareholders of
Phonetic in regards to this matter. We have not recorded any
obligation as of September 30, 2007.
In connection with our acquisition of Mobile Voice Control, we
agreed to make contingent earnout payments payable in our common
stock of up to 1.7 million shares upon the achievement of
certain performance targets through December 31, 2008, in
accordance with the purchase agreement. We have not recorded any
obligation relative to these performance measures as of
September 30, 2007.
In connection with our acquisition of BeVocal, we agreed to make
contingent earnout payments of up to $65.1 million,
including amounts payable to an investment banker, upon the
achievement of certain performance targets through
December 31, 2007, in accordance with the purchase
agreement. We have accrued $44.2 million of this amount as
of September 30, 2007. Of the amount estimated to be paid,
$41.3 million of the contingent earnout consideration is
payable in cash, and $2.9 million may be paid in the form
of our common stock, or cash, at our option. These contingent
earnout liabilities are payable in October 2008.
In connection with our acquisition of Commissure, we agreed to
make contingent earnout payments of up to $8.0 million upon
the achievement of certain performance targets through 2010, in
accordance with the merger agreement. If the targets are
achieved, the contingent earnout payment may be made in cash or
shares of our common stock, at our election. We have not
recorded any obligation relative to these performance measures
as of September 30, 2007.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, we agreed to make
contingent earnout payments of up to an additional $21,000,000
upon the achievement of certain performance targets through
2010, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement. If
the targets are achieved, the contingent earnout payment will be
made in cash or shares of our common stock, at our election. We
have not recorded any obligation relative to these performance
measures as of September 30, 2007.
In connection with our acquisition of Viecore, we agreed to use
our commercially reasonable efforts to file a registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission following
the closing of the acquisition to register the shares of the
common stock issued to the former Viecore stockholders. The cash
paid in the acquisition may increase by up to $15,375,000, and
the shares issued in the acquisition may decrease by up to
350,032 shares, based on the volume weighted average price
of our common stock on the effective date of the registration
statement, as more fully set forth in the merger agreement.
We assumed defined benefit pension plans as part of the
acquisition of Dictaphone Corporation on March 31, 2006,
which provide certain retirement and death benefits for former
Dictaphone employees located in the United Kingdom and Canada.
These plans require periodic cash contributions. The Canadian
plan is fully funded and
Table of Contents
expected to remain fully funded during fiscal 2008, without
additional funding by us. In fiscal 2007, total cash funding for
the UK pension plan was $1.7 million. For the UK pension
plan, we have a minimum funding requirement of £859,900
(approximately $1.8 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2007) for each of the next four years,
through fiscal 2011.
We have also assumed a post-retirement health care and life
insurance benefit plan in connection with the acquisition of
Dictaphone. The plan, which is closed to new participants,
provides certain post-retirement health care and life insurance
benefits and consists of a fixed subsidy for qualifying
employees in the United States and Canada. The plan is
non-funded and cash contributions are made each year to cover
claim costs incurred in that year. Total cash paid during fiscal
2007 for the post-retirement health care and life insurance
benefit plan was not material.
Through September 30, 2007, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis,
Nuance evaluates its estimates, assumptions and judgments,
including those related to revenue recognition; allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns; accounting for patent legal
defense costs; the costs to complete the development of custom
software applications; the valuation of goodwill, other
intangible assets and tangible long-lived assets; accounting for
acquisitions; share-based payments; obligation relating to
pension and post-retirement benefit plans; interest rate swaps
which are characterized as derivative instruments; income tax
reserves and valuation allowances; and loss contingencies.
Nuance management bases its estimates on historical experience
and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Nuance believes the following critical accounting policies most
significantly affect the portrayal of its financial condition
and results of operations and require its most difficult and
subjective judgments.
Revenue Recognition. Nuance recognizes product
and licensing revenue in accordance with Statement of Position,
or SOP,
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, and
SOP 98-9,
Modification of
SOP 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain
Transactions, and related authoritative literature. The
application of
SOP 97-2
requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement
includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor-specific
objective evidence, or VSOE, of fair value exists for those
elements. Nuances software arrangements generally include
software and post contract support which includes telephone
support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to three years. Changes to the elements
in a software arrangement, the ability to identify VSOE for
those elements and the fair value of the respective elements
could materially impact the amount of earned and unearned
revenue. Judgment is also required to assess whether future
releases of certain software represent new products or upgrades
and enhancements to existing products. In accordance with
SOP 97-2,
revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred,
(iii) the fee is fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is probable.
Non-software revenue is recognized in accordance with, the
Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff Accounting
Bulletin, or SAB, 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements. Under SAB 104, Nuance recognizes revenue
when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
(ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
(iii) the fees are fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Professional services revenue is recognized in accordance with
SOP 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and
Certain Performance Type Contracts on the
percentage-of-completion method. Nuance generally determines the
percentage-of-completion by comparing the labor hours incurred
to date to the estimated
Table of Contents
total labor hours required to complete the project. Nuance
considers labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure
of progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to
complete are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a
change become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss
will be incurred, such loss is recorded in the period
identified. Significant judgments and estimates are involved in
determining the percent complete of each contract. Different
assumptions could yield materially different results.
Nuance makes estimate of sales returns based on historical
experience. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, or SFAS 48, Revenue Recognition When Right
of Return Exists, the provision for these estimated
returns is recorded as a reduction of revenue and accounts
receivable at the time that the related revenue is recorded.
Nuance also makes estimates and reduces revenue recognized for
price protection and rebates, and certain marketing allowances
at the time the related revenue is recorded. If actual results
differ significantly from Nuances estimates, such
differences could have a material impact on Nuances
results of operations for the period in which the actual results
become known.
Nuances revenue recognition policies require management to
make significant estimates. Management analyzes various factors,
including a review of specific transactions, historical
experience, creditworthiness of customers and current market and
economic conditions. Changes in judgments based upon these
factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue and cost
recognized and thus affects Nuances results of operations
and financial condition.
Capitalized Patent Defense Costs. Nuance
monitors the anticipated outcome of legal actions, and if Nuance
determines that the success of the defense of a patent is
probable, and so long as Nuance believes that the future
economic benefit of the patent will be increased, Nuance then
capitalizes external legal costs incurred in the defense of
these patents, up to the level of the expected increased future
economic benefit. If changes in the anticipated outcome occur,
Nuance writes off any capitalized costs in the period the change
is determined. As of September 30, 2007 and 2006,
capitalized patent defense costs totaled $6.4 million.
Additional costs had been capitalized in fiscal 2007 relating to
our historic litigation with VoiceSignal, upon the consummation
of our acquisition of VoiceSignal we reclassified $6.9 million
of previously capitalized patent defense costs, of which the
majority were recorded into goodwill as a component of the
purchase price of VoiceSignal.
Research and Development Costs. Nuance
accounts for the internal costs relating to research and
development activities in accordance with SFAS 2,
Accounting for Research and Development Costs, and
SFAS 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed.
Research and development costs incurred for new software
products and enhancements to existing products, other than
certain software development costs that qualify for
capitalization, are expensed as incurred. Software development
costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological
feasibility, but prior to the general release of the product,
are capitalized and amortized to cost of revenue over the
estimated useful life of the related products. Judgment is
required in determining when technological feasibility of a
product is established. Nuance has determined that technological
feasibility for its software products is reached shortly before
the products are released to manufacturing. Costs incurred after
technological feasibility is established have not been material,
and accordingly, Nuance has expensed the internal costs relating
to research and development when incurred.
Licensed Technology. The cost of technology
which we have licensed to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed
by us is capitalized and amortized to cost of revenue over the
estimated useful life of the related products. At each balance
sheet date, Nuance evaluates these assets for impairment by
comparing the unamortized cost to the net realizable value.
Amortization expense was $0.5 million, $5.1 million
and $2.1 million for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Included in the fiscal 2006 amortization expense
was an additional $2.6 million of expense representing an
impairment determined to exist in order to value the licensed
technology at its net realizable value. See Note 8 of the
Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The net
unamortized licensed technology included in other intangible
assets at September 30, 2007 and 2006 were
$2.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
Valuation of Long-lived Tangible and Intangible Assets and
Goodwill. Nuance has significant long-lived
tangible and intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives, which are susceptible
to valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various
factors or conditions. The most significant long-lived tangible
and intangible assets are fixed assets, patents and core
technology, completed technology, customer relationships and
trademarks. All finite-lived intangible assets are amortized
based upon patterns in which the
Table of Contents
economic benefits of customer relationships are expected to be
utilized. The values of intangible assets, with the exception of
goodwill, were initially determined by a risk-adjusted,
discounted cash flow approach. Nuance assesses the potential
impairment of identifiable intangible assets and fixed assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying values may not be recoverable and at least annually.
Factors Nuance considers important, which could trigger an
impairment of such assets, include the following:
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would materially
impact future results of operations and financial position in
the reporting period identified.
In accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, Nuance tests goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite lives for impairment on an annual basis
as of July 1, and between annual tests if indicators of
potential impairment exist. The impairment test compares the
fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount,
including goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives,
to assess whether impairment is present. Nuance has reviewed the
provisions of SFAS 142 with respect to the criteria
necessary to evaluate the number of reporting units that exist.
Based on its review, Nuance has determined that it operates in
one reporting unit. Based on this assessment, Nuance has not had
any impairment charges during its history as a result of its
impairment evaluation of goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets under SFAS 142.
In accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Nuance
periodically reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate.
Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the
undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value for the
asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to
its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow
analysis. No impairment charges were taken in fiscal 2007, 2006
or 2005, based on the review of long-lived assets under
SFAS 144.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the useful lives of Nuances long-lived assets, determining
what reporting units exist and assessing when events or
circumstances would require an interim impairment analysis of
goodwill or other long-lived assets to be performed. Changes in
Nuances organization or its management reporting
structure, as well as other events and circumstances, including
but not limited to technological advances, increased competition
and changing economic or market conditions, could result in
(a) shorter estimated useful lives, (b) additional
reporting units, which may require alternative methods of
estimating fair values or greater disaggregation or aggregation
in Nuances analysis by reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on Nuances
consolidated financial statements through accelerated
amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Accounting for Acquisitions. We have completed
a number of significant business and other asset acquisitions
over the preceding five years which have resulted in significant
goodwill and other intangible asset balances. Our future
business strategy contemplates that we may continue to pursue
additional acquisitions in the future. Our accounting for
acquisitions involves significant judgments and estimates
primarily, but not limited to: the fair value of certain forms
of consideration, the fair value of acquired intangible assets,
which involve projections of future revenue and cash flows, the
fair value of other acquired assets and assumed liabilities,
including potential contingencies, and the useful lives and, as
applicable, the reporting unit, of the assets. Our financial
position or results of operations may be materially impacted by
changes in our initial assumptions and estimates relating to
prior or future acquisitions. Additionally, under SFAS 142,
we determine the fair value of the reporting unit, for purposes
of the first step in our annual goodwill impairment test, based
on our market value. If prior or future acquisitions are not
accretive to our results of operations as expected, our market
value declines dramatically, or we determine we have more than
one
Table of Contents
reporting unit, we may be required to complete the second step
which requires significant judgments and estimates and which may
result in material impairment charges in the period in which
they are determined.
Accounting for Long-Term Facility
Obligations. We have historically acquired
companies which have previously established restructuring
charges relating to lease exit costs, and we have recorded
restructuring charges of our own that include lease exit costs.
We follow the provisions of
EITF 95-3
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination or SFAS 146 Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities as
applicable. In accounting for these obligations, we are required
to make assumptions relating to the time period over which the
facility will remain vacant, sublease terms, sublease rates and
discount rates. We base our estimates and assumptions on the
best information available at the time of the obligation having
arisen. These estimates are reviewed and revised as facts and
circumstances dictate; changes in these estimates could have a
material effect on the amount accrued on the balance sheet.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments. We
account for share-based payments in accordance with
SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment. Under the fair
value recognition provisions of this statement, share-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the
value of the award and is recognized as expense over the
requisite service period which is generally the vesting period.
Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant
date requires judgment, including estimating expected dividends,
share price volatility and the amount of share-based awards that
are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ
significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation
expense and our results of operations could be materially
impacted.
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans. We
have defined benefit pension plans that were assumed as part of
the acquisition of Dictaphone Corporation, which provide certain
retirement and death benefits for former Dictaphone employees
located in the United Kingdom and Canada. Nuance also assumed a
post-retirement health care and life insurance benefit plan,
which is frozen relative to new enrollment, and which provides
certain post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits,
as well as a fixed subsidy for qualified former employees in the
United States and Canada. We use several actuarial and other
factors which attempt to estimate the ultimate expense,
liability and assets values related to our pension and
post-retirement benefit plans. These factors include assumptions
about discount rates, expected return on plan assets and the
rate of future compensation increases. In addition, subjective
assumptions, such as withdrawal and mortality rates, are also
utilized. The assumptions may differ materially from actual
results due to the changing market and economic condition or
other factors, and depending on their magnitude, could have a
significant impact on the amount we recorded. Pension and
post-retirement benefit plan assumptions are included in
Note 18 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Nuance does not provide for
U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of its
foreign subsidiaries, which Nuance considers to be indefinitely
reinvested outside of the U.S. in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 23,
Accounting for Income Taxes Special
Areas.
Nuance makes judgments regarding the realizability of its
deferred tax assets. In accordance with SFAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, the carrying value of
the net deferred tax assets is based on the belief that it is
more likely than not that Nuance will generate sufficient future
taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets after
consideration of all available evidence. Nuance regularly
reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability considering
historical profitability, projected future taxable income, and
the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences and tax planning strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for
U.S. deferred tax assets, which Nuance believes do not meet
the more likely than not criteria established by
SFAS 109. If Nuance is subsequently able to utilize all or
a portion of the deferred tax assets for which a valuation
allowance has been established, then Nuance may be required to
recognize these deferred tax assets through the reduction of the
valuation allowance which would result in a material benefit to
its results of operations in the period in which the benefit is
determined, excluding the recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
acquired in a business combination and created as a result of
share-based payments. The recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
resulting from share-based payments will be recorded as
additional
paid-in-capital.
The recognition of the
Table of Contents
portion of the valuation allowance which relates to net deferred
tax assets acquired in a business combination will reduce
goodwill, other intangible assets, and to the extent remaining,
the provision for income taxes.
Loss Contingencies. We are subject to legal
proceedings, lawsuits and other claims relating to labor,
service and other matters arising in the ordinary course of
business, as discussed in Note 17 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. Quarterly, we review the
status of each significant matter and assess our potential
financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or
legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated
loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination
of probability and the determination as to whether an exposure
is reasonably estimable. Because of uncertainties related to
these matters, accruals are based only on the best information
available at the time. As additional information becomes
available, we reassess the potential liability related to our
pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such
revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could
have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS 159 has as its objective to reduce
both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and
volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently. It also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons
between companies that choose different measurement attributes
for similar types of assets and liabilities. The statement is
effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal
year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is
permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year,
provided that the entity makes that choice in the first
120 days of that fiscal year. We are evaluating the impact,
if any, that SFAS 159 may have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS 157 establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. We have not yet
determined the effect, if any, that the application of
SFAS 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2006, the FASB issued
EITF 00-19-2,
Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements.
EITF 00-19-2
specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments
or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment
arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included
as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement,
should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with
SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies. For
registration payment arrangements and financial instruments
subject to those arrangements that were entered into prior to
the issuance of
EITF 00-19-2,
this guidance shall be effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are
evaluating the impact, if any, that
EITF 00-19-2
may have on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the effect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have
on our consolidated financial statements.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates, which could affect operating
results, financial position and cash flows. We manage our
exposure to these market risks through our regular operating and
financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of
derivative financial instruments.
Table of Contents
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable balances
reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change in the
value of the U.S. dollar as compared to foreign currencies
will have either a positive or negative effect on our financial
position and results of operations. Historically, our primary
exposure has related to transactions denominated in the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Israeli New
Shekel, and Hungarian Forint.
Assuming a 10% appreciation or depreciation in foreign currency
exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency exchange rates
at September 30, 2007, the impact to our revenue, operating
results or cash flows could be adversely affected.
Occasionally, we have entered into forward exchange contracts to
hedge against foreign currency fluctuations. These foreign
currency exchange contracts are entered into as economic hedges,
but are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes as
defined under SFAS 133. The notional contract amount of these
outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts was not material
at September 30, 2007 and a hypothetical change of 10% in
exchange rates would not have a material impact on the financial
results. During the fiscal year ended 2007 and 2006, the Company
recorded foreign exchange gains of $0.8 million and a loss of
$0.2 million, respectively.
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the Expanded 2006 Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2007, we held approximately
$184.3 million of cash and cash equivalents primarily
consisting of cash and money-market funds and $2.6 million
of short-term marketable securities. Due to the low current
market yields and the short-term nature of our investments, a
hypothetical change in market rates is not expected to have a
material effect on the fair value of our portfolio or results of
operations.
At September 30, 2007, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $663.7 million. To
partially offset this variable interest rate exposure, Nuance
entered into a $100 million interest rate swap derivative
contract. The interest rate swap is structured to offset period
changes in the variable interest rate without changing the
characteristics of the underlying debt instrument. A
hypothetical change in market rates would have a significant
impact on the interest expense and amounts payable relating to
the $563.7 million of debt that is not offset by the
interest rate swap; assuming a 1.0% change in interest rates,
the interest expense would increase $5.6 million per annum.
Nuance
Communications, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements
Table of Contents
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Table of Contents
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Nuance Communications, Inc. (the Company) as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended September 30, 2007. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Nuance Communications, Inc. at September 30,
2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As described in note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, Nuance Communications, Inc. adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans An Amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), effective
September 30, 2007.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Nuance Communications, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO Criteria),
and our report dated November 29, 2007 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO
SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 29, 2007
Table of Contents
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Nuance Communications, Inc. Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited Nuance Communication Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Nuance Communication Inc.s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Item 9A, Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Item 9A, Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,
managements assessment of and conclusion on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did
not include the internal controls of Mobile Voice Control, Inc.,
which the Company acquired on December 29, 2006, BlueStar
Resources Limited, which the Company acquired on March 26,
2007, BeVocal, Inc., which the Company acquired on
April 24, 2007, Tegic Communications, Inc., and Voice
Signal Technologies, Inc., which the Company acquired on
August 24, 2007, and Commissure Inc., which the Company
acquired on September 28, 2007, (collectively the
2007 Acquisitions), all of which are included in the
consolidated balance sheets of Nuance Communications, Inc. as of
September 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive loss,
and cash flows for the year then ended. Management did not
assess the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of the 2007 Acquisitions because of the timing of the
acquisitions which were completed during the year ended
September 30, 2007. The internal control over financial
reporting excluded from managements assessment for the
2007 Acquisitions constituted 4.5% of total assets as of
September 30, 2007, and 6.2% of total revenues for the year
then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting of Nuance Communications, Inc. also did not include an
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of
the 2007 Acquisitions.
In our opinion, Nuance Communications, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2007, based on the COSO
criteria.
Table of Contents
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Nuance Communications, Inc. as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended September 30, 2007 and our report dated
November 29, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO
SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 29, 2007
Table of Contents
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||