IX » Topics » 17. Stock-Based Compensation

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Nov 13, 2009.

(m) Stock-based compensation

The Company and its subsidiaries apply ASC 718 (“Compensation—Stock Compensation”). ASC 718 requires, with limited exception, that the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be measured based on the grant-date fair value. The costs are recognized over the requisite employee service period.

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Aug 14, 2009.

(m) Stock-based compensation

The Company and its subsidiaries apply FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FASB Statement No. 123(R)) (“Share-Based Payment”). FASB Statement No. 123(R) requires, with limited exception, that the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be measured based on the grant-date fair value. The costs are recognized over the requisite employee service period.

This excerpt taken from the IX 20-F filed Jun 26, 2009.

18. Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company has a number of stock-based compensation plans as incentive plans for directors, executive officers, corporate auditors and selected employees.

 

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Feb 13, 2009.

(m) Stock-based compensation

The Company and its subsidiaries apply FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FASB Statement No. 123(R)) (“Share-Based Payment”). FASB Statement No. 123(R) requires, with limited exception, that the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be measured based on the grant-date fair value. The costs are recognized over the requisite employee service period.

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Nov 14, 2008.

(m) Stock-based compensation

The Company and its subsidiaries apply FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FASB Statement No. 123(R)) (“Share-Based Payment”). FASB Statement No. 123(R) requires, with limited exception, that the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be measured based on the grant-date fair value. The costs are recognized over the requisite employee service period.

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Aug 15, 2008.

(m) Stock-based compensation

The Company and its subsidiaries apply FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FASB Statement No. 123(R)) (“Share-Based Payment”). FASB Statement No. 123(R) requires, with limited exception, that the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be measured based on the grant-date fair value. The costs are recognized over the requisite employee service period.

This excerpt taken from the IX 20-F filed Jul 2, 2008.

17. Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company has a number of stock-based compensation plans as incentive plans for directors, executive officers, corporate auditors and selected employees.

 

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Dec 28, 2007.

(m) Stock-based compensation

The Company and its subsidiaries apply FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FASB Statement No. 123(R)) (“Share-Based Payment”). FASB Statement No. 123(R) superseded APB Opinion No. 25 (“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”) and replaced the existing FASB Statement No. 123 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”), and requires, with limited exception, that the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be measured based on the grant-date fair value. The costs are recognized over the requisite employee service period.

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Aug 27, 2007.

17. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has a number of stock-based compensation plans as incentive plans for directors, executive officers, corporate auditors and selected employees.

This excerpt taken from the IX 20-F filed Jul 17, 2007.

17. Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company has a number of stock-based compensation plans as incentive plans for directors, executive officers, corporate auditors and selected employees.

 

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed May 11, 2007.

Stock-Based Compensation

The adoption of FASB Statement No. 123(R) resulted in a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses as stock-based compensation costs of 3,515 million yen in the fiscal year ended March 31,2007.

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Dec 26, 2006.

(m) Stock-based compensation

The Company and its subsidiaries adopted FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FASB Statement No. 123(R)) (“Share-Based Payment”), using the modified prospective method, in the six months ended September 30, 2006. FASB Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 (“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”) and replaces the existing FASB Statement No. 123 (“Accounting for Stock-Based compensation”), and requires, with limited exception, that stock-based compensation expenses in exchange of their service provided by employees be measured based on the grant-date fair value. The expenses are recognized over an employee requisite service period.

Until the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, the Company accounted for the stock-based compensation by applying the intrinsic value approach pursuant to APB Opinion No. 25 and recognized no compensation expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2005 and the fiscal year ended march 31, 2006, with the exclusion of the expenses related to the stock compensation program for directors, executive officers and group executives which was introduced during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

Had compensation expenses for the Company’s stock option plans been determined consistent with FASB Statement No. 123, net income and earnings per share (EPS) for the period ended September 30, 2005 and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as follows:

 

     Millions of yen  
    

The six months

ended

September 30,

2005

   

The six months

ended

September 30,

2006

  

The fiscal year

ended

March 31,

2006

 

As reported:

       

Net Income

   83,954     91,326    166,388  

Add: Stock-based compensation expenses included in reported net income

   112     —      313  

Less: Total stock-based compensation expenses determined by fair value based method

   (1,330 )   —      (3,567 )

Pro forma:

       

Net Income

   82,736     —      163,134  
     Yen  
    

The six months

ended

September 30,

2005

   

The six months

ended

September 30,

2006

  

The fiscal year

ended

March 31,

2006

 

Net Income

       

As reported:

       

Basic EPS

   957.87     1,014.29    1,883.89  

Diluted EPS

   907.93     977.73    1,790.30  

Pro forma:

       

Basic EPS

   943.97     —      1,847.05  

Diluted EPS

   894.87     —      1,755.61  

 

33


Table of Contents

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of (Y)2,207 million using the binominal option pricing model in the six months ended September 30, 2006 while the fair value of stock options was measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model until the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Aug 11, 2006.

(n) Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation expense is accounted for in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 (“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”) as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”) amended by FASB Statement No. 148 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure”). FASB Statement No. 123 provides entities a choice of recognizing related compensation expense by adopting the fair value method or to continue to measure compensation using the intrinsic value approach under APB Opinion No. 25. The Company chose to use the intrinsic value approach pursuant to APB Opinion No. 25 and recognized no compensation expense in fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 with the exclusion of the expenses related to the stock compensation program for directors, executive officers and group executives which was newly introduced in fiscal 2006.

Had compensation expense for the Company’s stock option plans been determined consistent with FASB Statement No. 123, net income and earnings per share (EPS) in fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 would have been as follows:

 

     Millions of yen    

Millions of
U.S. dollars

2006

 
     2004     2005     2006    

As reported:

        

Net income

   ¥ 54,020     ¥ 91,496     ¥ 166,388     $ 1,416  

Add: Stock-based compensation expenses included in reported net income

     —         —         313       3  

Less: Total stock-based compensation expenses determined by fair value based method

     (1,735 )     (2,199 )     (3,567 )     (30 )

Pro forma:

        

Net income

     52,285       89,297       163,134       1,389  

Net income—

        

As reported:

        

Basic EPS

   ¥ 645.52     ¥ 1,087.82     ¥ 1,883.89     $ 16.04  

Diluted EPS

     601.46       1,002.18       1,790.30       15.24  

Pro forma:

        

Basic EPS

     624.78       1,061.67       1,847.05       15.72  

Diluted EPS

     582.64       978.45       1,755.61       14.95  

In December 2004, FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (“Share-Based Payment”) was issued. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 (see (ae)).

This excerpt taken from the IX 6-K filed Jan 5, 2006.

(m) Stock-based compensation

 

Stock-based compensation expense is accounted in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 (“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”) as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”) amended by FASB Statement No. 148 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure”). FASB Statement No. 123 provides entities a choice of recognizing related compensation expense by adopting the fair value method or to continue to measure compensation using the intrinsic value approach under APB Opinion No. 25. The Company chose to use the intrinsic value approach pursuant to APB Opinion No. 25 and recognized no compensation expense for the six months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 with the exclusion of the computation expenses related to stock-based compensation plan for directors, executive officers and group executives which was newly introduced during the six months ended September 30, 2005.

 

Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans been determined consistent with FASB Statement No. 123, net income and earnings per share (EPS) for the six months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 would have been as follows:

 

     Millions of yen

 
    

The six months
ended

September 30,
2004


   

The six months
ended

September 30,
2005


   

The fiscal year
ended

March 31,
2005


 

As reported:

                  

Net Income

   42,688     83,954     91,496  

Add: Stock-based compensation expenses included in reported net income

   —       112     —    

Less: Total stock-based compensation expenses determined by fair value based method

   (927 )   (1,330 )   (2,199 )

Pro forma:

                  

Net Income

   41,761     82,736     89,297  
     Yen

 
    

The six months
ended

September 30,
2004


   

The six months
ended

September 30,
2005


   

The fiscal year
ended

March 31,
2005


 

Net Income

                  

As reported:

                  

Basic EPS

   509.74     957.87     1,087.82  

Diluted EPS

   469.19     907.93     1,002.18  

Pro forma:

                  

Basic EPS

   498.68     943.97     1,061.67  

Diluted EPS

   459.18     894.87     978.45  

 

35


Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the IX 20-F filed Aug 22, 2005.

(n) Stock-based compensation

 

Stock-based compensation expense is accounted in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 (“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”) as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”) amended by FASB Statement No. 148 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure”). FASB Statement No. 123 provides entities a choice of recognizing related compensation expense by adopting the fair value method or to continue to measure compensation using the intrinsic value approach under APB Opinion No. 25. The Company chose to use the intrinsic value approach pursuant to APB Opinion No. 25 and recognized no compensation expense in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005.

 

Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans been determined consistent with FASB Statement No. 123, net income and earnings per share (EPS) in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 would have been as follows:

 

     Millions of yen

    Millions of
U.S. dollars


 
     2003

    2004

    2005

    2005

 

As reported:

                                

Net income

   ¥ 30,243     ¥ 54,020     ¥ 91,496     $ 852  

Less: Total stock-based compensation expenses determined by fair value based method

     (1,726 )     (1,735 )     (2,199 )     (20 )

Pro forma:

                                

Net income

     28,517       52,285       89,297       832  

Net income—

                                

As reported:

                                

Basic EPS

   ¥ 361.44     ¥ 645.52     ¥ 1,087.82     $ 10.13  

Diluted EPS

     340.95       601.46       1,002.18       9.33  

Pro forma:

                                

Basic EPS

     340.81       624.78       1,061.67       9.89  

Diluted EPS

     321.55       582.64       978.45       9.11  

 

F-14


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

ORIX Corporation and its Subsidiaries

 

In December 2004, FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (“Share-Based Payment”) was issued. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 (see (ae)).

 

This excerpt taken from the IX 20-F filed Jul 15, 2005.

(n) Stock-based compensation

 

Stock-based compensation expense is accounted in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 (“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”) as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”) amended by FASB Statement No. 148 (“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure”). FASB Statement No. 123 provides entities a choice of recognizing related compensation expense by adopting the fair value method or to continue to measure compensation using the intrinsic value approach under APB Opinion No. 25. The Company chose to use the intrinsic value approach pursuant to APB Opinion No. 25 and recognized no compensation expense in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005.

 

Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans been determined consistent with FASB Statement No. 123, net income and earnings per share (EPS) in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 would have been as follows:

 

    Millions of yen

    Millions of
U.S. dollars


 
    2003

    2004

    2005

    2005

 

As reported:

                               

Net income

  ¥ 30,243     ¥ 54,020     ¥ 91,496     $ 852  

Less: Total stock-based compensation expenses determined by fair value based method

    (1,726 )     (1,735 )     (2,199 )     (20 )

Pro forma:

                               

Net income

    28,517       52,285       89,297       832  

Net income—

                               

As reported:

                               

Basic EPS

  ¥ 361.44     ¥ 645.52     ¥ 1,087.82     $ 10.13  

Diluted EPS

    340.95       601.46       1,002.18       9.33  

Pro forma:

                               

Basic EPS

    340.81       624.78       1,061.67       9.89  

Diluted EPS

    321.55       582.64       978.45       9.11  

 

F-14


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

ORIX Corporation and its Subsidiaries

 

In December 2004, FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (“Share-Based Payment”) was issued. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 (see (ae)).

 

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki