|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the PGTI DEF 14A filed Jun 24, 2008. IMPACT OF TAX TREATMENTS ON COMPENSATION Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deduction for public companies to $1 million for compensation paid to a companys chief executive officer or any of the four other most highly compensated executive officers. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limit if Internal Revenue Code requirements are met. We believe that stock options granted under our long-term incentive plans would qualify as performance-based compensation. While such stock options vest over a specified period of time contingent upon the option holders continued employment with the Company, such stock options only have value if the Companys performance results in a stock price higher than the price on the date of grant. In addition, we believe that annual cash bonus awards would qualify as performance-based compensation. In contrast, restricted stock awards, do not qualify as performance-based compensation because they have immediate value (at a minimum, once the restrictions are released) irrespective of the Companys performance. While we seek to take advantage of favorable tax treatment for executive compensation where appropriate, the primary drivers for determining the amount and form of executive compensation must be the retention and motivation of superior executive talent rather than tax-based considerations. This excerpt taken from the PGTI DEF 14A filed Apr 20, 2007. IMPACT OF
TAX TREATMENTS ON COMPENSATION
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax
deduction for public companies to $1 million for
compensation paid to a companys chief executive officer or
any of the four other most highly compensated executive
officers. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not
subject to the deduction limit if Internal Revenue Code
requirements are met. We believe that stock options granted
under our long-term incentive plans would qualify as
performance-based compensation. While such stock options vest
over a specified period of time contingent upon the option
holders continued employment with the Company, such stock
options only have value if the Companys performance
results in a stock price higher than the price on the date of
grant. In addition, we believe that annual cash incentive awards
would qualify as performance-based compensation. In contrast,
restricted stock awards, do not qualify as performance-based
compensation because they have immediate value (at a minimum,
once the restrictions are released) irrespective of the
Companys performance.
While we seek to take advantage of favorable tax treatment for
executive compensation where appropriate, the primary drivers
for determining the amount and form of executive compensation
must be the retention and motivation of superior executive
talent rather than tax-based considerations.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for PGTI: |
| |||||||