PCG » Topics » Diablo Canyon Steam Generator Replacement Projects

This excerpt taken from the PCG 8-K filed Nov 18, 2005.

Diablo Canyon Steam Generator Replacement Projects

               On November 18, 2005, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted to approve Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (Utility) application to replace the turbines, steam generators and other equipment at the two nuclear operating units at the Utility's Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, referred to as the Steam Generator Replacement Project (SGRP).  The CPUC also certified the environmental impact report (EIR) with respect to the SGRP as final.  The EIR found that, for the SGRP as a whole, there are no environmental impacts that are significant, provided certain mitigation measures are implemented.

               In voting to approve its final decision, the CPUC adopted the findings it made in its February 24, 2005 interim decision that the SGRP is cost-effective, that the Utility’s projected cost of $706 million (as adjusted for actual inflation and cost of capital) is a reasonable estimate of the SGRP cost, and that the Utility cannot recover costs in excess of $815 million (as adjusted for actual inflation and cost of capital).  The CPUC also adopted its earlier findings that (i) if the costs did not exceed $706 million, the CPUC did not intend to conduct an after-the-fact reasonableness review of the SGRP costs but that such a review was not precluded, and (ii) if the cost exceeds $706 million (as adjusted for actual inflation and cost of capital) or the CPUC later finds that it has reason to believe the costs may be unreasonable regardless of the amount, the entire SGRP cost will be subject to a reasonableness review. 

               The majority of the projected capital costs for the SGRP will be expended over the 2007-2009 period as the Utility plans to replace the steam generators in Unit 2 in 2008 and in Unit 1 in 2009.

 



SIGNATURE

     

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

     

                                                     

    

PG&E CORPORATION

                                           

     

LINDA Y.H. CHENG                       

Linda Y.H. Cheng
Vice President and Corporate Secretary

       

       

       

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

        

LINDA Y.H. CHENG                         

Linda Y.H. Cheng
Vice President and Corporate Secretary

Dated:  November 18, 2005

These excerpts taken from the PCG 8-K filed Oct 28, 2005.

Diablo Canyon Steam Generator Replacement Projects

 

The Utility established a steam generated replacement project to replace turbines and steam generators and other equipment at the two nuclear operating units at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. The Utility plans to replace Unit 2’s steam generators in 2008 and replace Unit 1’s steam generators in 2009. Because the fabrication of new steam generators requires a long lead-time, in August 2004 the Utility entered into contracts with Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, or Westinghouse, for the design, fabrication and delivery of eight steam generators. Under the contracts, the Utility must pay Westinghouse for all work done and pro-rated profit up to the time the contracts are completed or cancelled. The contracts require progress payments in line with actual expenditures for materials and work completed over the life of the contracts. The Utility is currently in negotiation for an installation contract for the new steam generators. The negotiation is expected to be completed by the end of February 2005. On January 25, 2005, a CPUC administrative law judge issued a proposed decision that would find the steam generator replacement project to be cost-effective and would authorize the Utility to recover the projected $706 million capital cost of the project in rates with no after-the-fact reasonableness review if the total costs do not exceed $706 million, and established a maximum project cost of $815 million. If the project costs exceed $706 million, or if the CPUC has reason to believe that the costs may be unreasonable regardless of the amount, the CPUC may conduct a reasonableness review of all costs. The proposed decision recommends that the Utility would be allowed to recover the revenue requirements related to the project in rates beginning on January 1 of the year following the commencement of commercial operations of each unit. The CPUC may act on the proposed decision at its meeting to be held on February 25, 2005. Assuming the CPUC approves the proposed decision, the Utility would make the capital expenditures required to maintain a 2008/2009 implementation schedule. It is expected that the CPUC will issue a final decision on whether to approve the project in September 2005, after considering the environmental impact review for the project. Expenditures on the project of approximately $25 million are expected to be incurred through February 2005 when the CPUC’s decision on cost effectiveness is expected and these are expected to grow to approximately $70 million in September 2005 when the CPUC’s final decision approving the project is expected. If the CPUC approves the project, the Utility estimates it would spend an additional $10 million in the last quarter of 2005. If the CPUC does not approve the projects, then the Utility will terminate the contracts and seek to recover the project costs that it incurred before termination from customers through the abandoned project process.

 

Diablo Canyon Steam Generator Replacement Projects

 

On February 24, 2005 the CPUC issued an interim decision on the Utility’s Diablo Canyon Steam Generator Replacement Project, or SGRP, application.  The interim decision concluded that the SGRP is cost-effective and $706

 

54



 

million, as adjusted for actual inflation and cost of capital, is a reasonable estimate of the SGRP cost.  The interim decision also concluded that an after-the-fact reasonableness review of the SGRP cost is not required, but not precluded either.  It adopts a maximum allowable SGRP cost cap of $815 million as adjusted for actual inflation and cost of capital, and the Utility will not be allowed to recover SGRP costs in excess of this amount.  The Utility will file an advice letter to request authority to implement a rate increase, subject to refund, for each unit at the time each unit begins commercial operations.  After installation is complete, and both units are operational, the Utility will be required to file an application to include the costs permanently in rates.  The interim decision does not approve or disapprove the SGRP, guarantee or approve the recovery of any expenditures related thereto, or dictate the outcome of the environmental review of the SGRP pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA.  A final decision, which will include the results of the CEQA review, is expected in September 2005.  As of March 31, 2005, expenditures on the project of approximately $26.7 million have been incurred.  These expenditures are expected to increase to approximately $65 million by September 2005 when the CPUC’s final decision approving the project is expected.  If the CPUC approves the project, the Utility estimates it would spend an additional $14.5 million in the last quarter of 2005.  If the CPUC does not approve the projects, then the Utility will terminate the contracts and seek to recover the project costs that it incurred before termination from customers through the abandoned project process.

 

This excerpt taken from the PCG 10-K filed Feb 18, 2005.

Diablo Canyon Steam Generator Replacement Projects

        The Utility established a steam generated replacement project to replace turbines and steam generators and other equipment at the two nuclear operating units at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. The Utility plans to replace Unit 2's steam generators in 2008 and replace Unit 1's steam generators in 2009. Because the fabrication of new steam generators requires a long lead-time, in August 2004 the Utility entered into contracts with Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, or Westinghouse, for the design, fabrication and delivery of eight steam generators. Under the contracts, the Utility must pay Westinghouse for all work done and pro-rated profit up to the time the contracts are completed or cancelled. The contracts require progress payments in line with actual expenditures for materials and work completed over the life of the contracts. The Utility is currently in negotiation for an installation contract for the new steam generators. The negotiation is expected to be completed by the end of February 2005. On January 25, 2005, a CPUC administrative law judge issued a proposed decision that would find the steam generator replacement project to be cost-effective and would authorize the Utility to recover the projected $706 million capital cost of the project in rates with no after-the-fact reasonableness review if the total costs do not exceed $706 million, and established a maximum project cost of $815 million. If the project costs exceed $706 million, or if the CPUC has reason to believe that the costs may be unreasonable regardless of the amount, the CPUC may conduct a reasonableness review of all costs. The proposed decision recommends that the Utility would be allowed to recover the revenue requirements related to the project in rates beginning on January 1 of the year following the commencement of commercial operations of each unit. The CPUC may act on the proposed decision at its meeting to be held on February 25, 2005. Assuming the CPUC approves the proposed decision, the Utility would make the capital expenditures required to maintain a 2008/2009 implementation schedule. It is expected that the CPUC will issue a final decision on whether to approve the project in September 2005, after considering the environmental impact review for the project. Expenditures on the project of approximately $25 million are expected to be incurred through February 2005 when the CPUC's decision on cost effectiveness is expected and these are expected to grow to approximately $70 million in September 2005 when the CPUC's final decision approving the project is expected. If the CPUC approves the project, the Utility estimates it would spend an additional $10 million in the last quarter of 2005. If the CPUC does not approve the projects, then the Utility will terminate the contracts and seek to recover the project costs that it incurred before termination from customers through the abandoned project process.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki