|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
PCG » Topics » The Utility's operations are subject to extensive environmental laws, and changes in, or liabilities under, these laws could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.This excerpt taken from the PCG 8-K filed Oct 28, 2005. The Utilitys operations are subject to extensive environmental laws, and changes in, or liabilities under, these laws could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
The Utilitys operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws. Complying with these environmental laws has in the past required significant expenditures for environmental compliance, monitoring and pollution control equipment, as well as for related fees and permits. Moreover, compliance in the future may require significant expenditures relating to electric and magnetic fields. The Utility also is subject to significant liabilities related to the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination at the Utilitys current and former facilities, as well as at third-party owned sites. Due to the potential for imposition of stricter standards and greater regulation in the future and the possibility that other potentially responsible parties may not be financially able to contribute to cleanup costs, conditions may change or additional contamination may be discovered, the Utilitys environmental compliance and remediation costs could increase, and the timing of its capital expenditures in the future may accelerate. If the Utility is unable to recover the costs of complying with environmental laws in its rates in a timely manner, the Utilitys financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, in the event the Utility must pay materially more than the amount that it currently has reserved on its balance sheet to satisfy its environmental remediation obligations and the Utility is unable to recover these costs from insurance or through rates in a timely manner, PG&E Corporations and the Utilitys financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
The Utility faces the risk of unrecoverable costs if its customers obtain distribution and transportation services from other providers as a result of municipalization, competition, technological change, or other forms of bypass.
The Utilitys customers could bypass its distribution and transportation system by obtaining service from other sources. Forms of bypass of the Utilitys electricity distribution system include the construction of duplicate distribution facilities to serve specific existing or new customers, the municipalization of the Utilitys distribution facilities by local governments or districts, and other forms of bypass or competition. Bypass of the Utilitys system may result in stranded investment capital, loss of customer growth or additional barriers to cost recovery. Recently, both the Sacramento Municipal Utility District and South San Joaquin Irrigation District have studied the feasibility of condemning portions of the Utilitys electric system within Yolo County and San Joaquin County, respectively. If these agencies continue their efforts, they must satisfy a number of legal steps, which will likely span several years. The Utility opposes these efforts as not being within the best interests of the customers within the subject areas, as well as other customers. The Utilitys natural gas transportation facilities also are at risk of being bypassed by interstate pipeline companies that construct facilities in the Utilitys markets or by customers who build pipeline connections that bypass the Utilitys natural gas transportation and distribution system, or by customers who use and transport LNG. As customers and local public officials explore their energy options in light of the California energy crisis, these bypass risks may be increasing and may increase further if the Utilitys rates exceed the cost of other available alternatives. In addition, technological changes could result in the development of economically attractive alternatives to purchasing electricity through the Utilitys distribution facilities. Neither PG&E Corporation nor the Utility can currently predict the impact of these actions and developments on the Utilitys business, although one possible outcome is a decline in the demand for the services that the Utility provides, which would result in a corresponding decline in the Utilitys revenues and PG&E Corporations consolidated revenues.
If the number of the Utilitys customers declines due to municipalization, competition, technological changes or other forms of bypass, and the Utilitys rates are not adjusted in a timely manner to allow it to fully recover its investment in electricity and natural gas facilities and electricity procurement costs, PG&E Corporations and the Utilitys financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
This excerpt taken from the PCG 10-K filed Feb 18, 2005. The Utility's operations are subject to extensive environmental laws, and changes in, or liabilities under, these laws could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. The Utility's operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws. Complying with these environmental laws has in the past required significant expenditures for environmental compliance, monitoring and pollution control equipment, as well as for related fees and permits. Moreover, compliance in the future may require significant expenditures relating to electric and magnetic fields. The Utility also is subject to significant liabilities related to the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination at the Utility's current and former facilities, as well as at third-party owned sites. Due to the potential for imposition of stricter standards and greater regulation in the future and the possibility that other potentially responsible parties may not be financially able to contribute to cleanup costs, conditions may change or additional contamination may be discovered, the Utility's environmental compliance and remediation costs could increase, and the timing of its capital expenditures in the future may accelerate. If the Utility is unable to recover the costs of complying with environmental laws in its rates in a timely manner, the Utility's financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, in the event the Utility must pay materially more than the amount that it currently has reserved on its balance sheet to satisfy its environmental remediation obligations and the Utility is unable to recover these costs from insurance or through rates in a timely manner, PG&E Corporation's and the Utility's financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. 59 | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||