|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the PALM 10-Q filed Apr 3, 2009. Income Taxes Our deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to estimated realizable value, which assumes that it is more likely than not that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the net carrying value. The four sources of taxable income to be considered in determining whether a valuation allowance is required include:
32
Table of ContentsDetermining whether a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is necessary requires an analysis of both positive and negative evidence regarding realization of the deferred tax assets. In general, positive evidence may include:
In general, negative evidence may include:
The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified and judgment must be used in considering the relative impact of positive and negative evidence. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, our operating results reflected a cumulative three-year loss after adjusting for the effect of the valuation of our investment in non-current auction rate securities and a one-time gain on the sale of our land. The cumulative three-year loss is considered significant negative evidence which is objective and verifiable. Additional negative evidence we considered at that time included the uncertainty regarding the magnitude and length of the current economic recession and the highly competitive nature of the smartphone and mobile phones market. Positive evidence that we considered in our assessment at that time included lengthy operating loss carryforward periods, a lack of unused expired operating loss carryforwards in our history and estimates of future taxable income. However, there is uncertainty as to our ability to meet our estimates of future taxable income in order to recover our deferred tax assets in the United States. After considering both the positive and negative evidence for second quarter of fiscal year 2009, we determined that it was no longer more-likely-than-not that we would realize the full value of our United States deferred tax assets. As a result, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in the United States to reduce them to their estimated net realizable value with a corresponding non-cash charge of $407.4 million to the provision for income taxes, net of tax benefits generated during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and will be maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of the valuation allowance. On June 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Financial Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, we recognize the tax liability for uncertain income tax positions on the income tax return based on the two-step process prescribed in the interpretation. The first step is to determine whether it is more likely than not that each income tax position would be sustained upon audit. The second step is to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority. Estimating these amounts requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We evaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on the consideration of several factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in applicable tax law, settlement of issues under audit and new exposures. If we later determine that our exposure is lower or that the liability is not sufficient to cover our revised expectations, we adjust the liability and effect a related change in our tax provision during the period in which we make such determination. Our key critical accounting policies are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
33
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the PALM 10-Q filed Jan 6, 2009. Income Taxes Our deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to estimated realizable value, which assumes that it is more likely than not that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the net carrying value. The four sources of taxable income to be considered in determining whether a valuation allowance is required include:
27
Table of Contents
Determining whether a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is necessary requires an analysis of both positive and negative evidence regarding realization of the deferred tax assets. In general, positive evidence may include:
In general, negative evidence may include:
The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence should be commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified and judgment must be used in considering the relative impact of positive and negative evidence. During the quarter ended November 30, 2008, our operating results reflected a cumulative three-year loss after adjusting for the effect of recent uncertainties in the credit markets on the valuation of our investment in non-current auction rate securities and a one-time gain on the sale of our land. The cumulative three-year loss is considered significant negative evidence which is objective and verifiable. Additional negative evidence we considered included the uncertainty regarding the magnitude and length of the current economic recession and the highly competitive nature of the smartphone and mobile phones market. Positive evidence that we considered in our assessment included lengthy operating loss carryforward periods, a lack of unused expired operating loss carryforwards in our history and estimates of future taxable income. However, there is uncertainty as to our ability to meet our estimates of future taxable income in order to recover our deferred tax assets in the United States. After considering both the positive and negative evidence for the three months ended November 30, 2008, we determined that it was no longer more-likely-than-not that we would realize the full value of our United States deferred tax assets. As a result, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in the United States to reduce them to their estimated net realizable value with a corresponding non-cash charge of approximately $407.4 million to the provision for income taxes, net of tax benefits generated during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and is maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of the valuation allowance. On June 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Financial Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, we recognize the tax liability for uncertain income tax positions on the income tax return based on the two-step process prescribed in the interpretation. The first step is to determine whether it is more likely than not that each income tax position would be sustained upon audit. The second step is to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority. Estimating these amounts requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We evaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on the consideration of several factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in applicable tax law, settlement of issues under audit and new exposures. If we later determine that our exposure is lower or that the liability is not sufficient to cover our revised expectations, we adjust the liability and effect a related change in our tax provision during the period in which we make such determination.
28
Table of ContentsOur key critical accounting policies are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. This excerpt taken from the PALM 10-Q filed Oct 3, 2008. Income Taxes Our deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to estimated realizable value, based on forecasts of results and certain of our tax planning strategies. The carrying value of our net deferred tax assets assumes that it is more likely than not that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the net carrying value. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and is maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of the valuation allowance based upon current and preceding years results of operations and anticipated profit levels in future years. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to adjust our valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets with a corresponding impact to the provision for income taxes. On June 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Financial Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, we recognize the tax liability for uncertain income tax positions on the income tax return based on the two-step process prescribed in the interpretation. The first step is to determine whether it is more likely than not that each income tax position would be sustained upon audit. The second step is to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority. Estimating these amounts requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We evaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on the consideration of several factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in applicable tax law, settlement of issues under audit and new exposures. If we later determine that our exposure is lower or that the liability is not sufficient to cover our revised expectations, we adjust the liability and effect a related change in our tax provision during the period in which we make such determination.
28
Table of ContentsOur key critical accounting policies are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. These excerpts taken from the PALM 10-K filed Jul 25, 2008. Income Taxes SIZE="2">Our deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. A On June 1, 2007,
41 Table of Contents
Our key critical accounting policies are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. STYLE="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">42 Table of Contents
Income Taxes Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is based on pre-tax financial accounting income or loss. Deferred tax assets represent temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years, including net operating loss carryforwards, deferred expenses and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to estimated realizable value, based on estimates, non-expiring credits and certain tax planning strategies. The carrying value of Palms net deferred tax assets assumes that it is more likely than not that Palm will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the net carrying value. Palm does not provide U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries that it expects to permanently reinvest in operations outside the U.S. Palm accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Financial Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. Accordingly, Palm reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits
71
Table of Contentsresulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Palm recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to income tax benefits in income tax expense. This excerpt taken from the PALM 10-K filed Jul 19, 2007. Income Taxes Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is based on pre-tax financial accounting income or loss. Deferred tax assets represent temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years, including net operating loss carryforwards, deferred expenses and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to estimated realizable value, based on estimates, non-expiring credits and certain tax planning strategies. The carrying value of Palms net deferred tax assets assumes that it is more likely than not that Palm will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the net carrying value. Palm does not provide U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries that it expects to permanently reinvest in operations outside the U.S. This excerpt taken from the PALM 10-K filed Jul 28, 2006. Income Taxes Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended May 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is based on pre-tax financial accounting income or loss. Prior to October 29, 2003, Palms consolidated federal, state and foreign income tax returns included the operating results of PalmSource. Deferred tax assets represent temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years, including net operating loss carryforwards, deferred expenses and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to estimated realizable value, based on estimates, non-expiring credits and certain tax planning strategies. The carrying value of Palms net deferred tax assets assumes that it is more likely than not that Palm will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to realize the net carrying value. Palm does not provide U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries that it expects to permanently reinvest in operations outside the U.S. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||