PEGA » Topics » Fair Value Measurements

These excerpts taken from the PEGA 10-K filed Mar 9, 2009.

Fair Value Measurements

SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including the Company’s marketable securities.

The Company’s investments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, or broker dealer quotations and matrix pricing compiled by third party pricing vendors, respectively, which are based on third party pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

 

53


Table of Contents

PEGASYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The fair value hierarchy of the Company’s marketable securities at fair value in connection with our adoption of SFAS 157 is as follows:

 

(in thousands)    December 31,
2008
   Fair Value Measurements at Reporting
Date Using
      Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)

Cash equivalents

   $ 10,512    $ 10,512    $ —  
                    

Marketable securities:

        

Municipal bonds

   $ 120,896    $ 36,776    $ 84,120

Government sponsored enterprises

     6,018      3,007      3,011

Corporate bonds

     4,228      4,228      —  
                    

Total marketable securities:

   $ 131,142    $ 44,011    $ 87,131
                    

Fair Value Measurements

STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a
basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs
other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy
requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value,
including the Company’s marketable securities.

The Company’s investments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, or broker dealer quotations and matrix pricing compiled by third party pricing vendors, respectively, which are based on third party pricing sources with reasonable levels
of price transparency.

 


53







Table of Contents



PEGASYSTEMS INC.

FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 


The fair value hierarchy of the Company’s marketable securities at fair value in connection with
our adoption of SFAS 157 is as follows:

 



































































































































(in thousands)  December 31,
2008
  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting
Date Using
    Quoted Prices
in Active
FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1">Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level
2)

Cash equivalents

  $10,512  $10,512  $—  
            

Marketable securities:

      

Municipal bonds

  $120,896  $36,776  $84,120

Government sponsored enterprises

   6,018   3,007   3,011

Corporate bonds

   4,228   4,228   —  
            

Total marketable securities:

  $131,142  $44,011  $87,131
            
This excerpt taken from the PEGA 10-Q filed Nov 6, 2008.

Fair Value Measurements

SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including the Company’s marketable securities.

The Company’s investments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, or broker dealer quotations and matrix pricing compiled by third party pricing vendors, respectively, which are based on third party pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

The fair value hierarchy of the Company’s marketable securities at fair value in connection with our adoption of SFAS 157 is as follows:

 

          Fair Value Measurements at Reporting
Date Using
(in thousands)    September 30,
2008
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Short-term investments:

        

Government sponsored enterprises

   $ 13,002    $ 2,002    $ 11,000

Corporate bonds

     10,144      8,896      1,248

Municipal bonds

     107,098      16,000      91,098
                    

Total short-term investments:

   $ 130,244    $ 26,898    $ 103,346
                    

 

7


Table of Contents

PEGASYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

This excerpt taken from the PEGA 10-Q filed Aug 7, 2008.

Fair Value Measurements

SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including the Company’s marketable securities.

The Company’s investments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, or broker dealer quotations and matrix pricing compiled by third party pricing vendors, respectively, which are based on third party pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include government debt securities, municipal debt securities, money market securities and most of the U.S. corporate debt securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include some of the municipal and corporate debt securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

7


Table of Contents

PEGASYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The fair value hierarchy of the Company’s marketable securities at fair value in connection with our adoption of SFAS 157 is as follows:

 

     June 30,
2008
   Fair Value Measurements at Reporting
Date Using
(in thousands)       Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)

Short-term investments:

        

Government debt securities

   $ 35,052    $ 20,016    $ 15,036

Corporate debt securities

     14,235      12,735      1,500

Municipal debt securities

     98,170      20,374      77,796
                    

Total short-term investments:

   $ 147,457    $ 53,125    $ 94,332
                    
This excerpt taken from the PEGA 10-Q filed May 8, 2008.

Fair Value Measurements

SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including the Company’s marketable securities.

The Company’s cash and investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, or broker dealer quotations and matrix pricing compiled by third party pricing vendors, respectively, which are based on third party pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include government debt securities, municipal debt securities, high quality foreign debt securities, money market securities and most of the U.S. corporate debt securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include some of the municipal and corporate debt securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

11


Table of Contents

PEGASYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

The fair value hierarchy of the Company’s marketable securities at fair value in connection with our adoption of SFAS 157 (in thousands) is as follows:

 

          Fair Value Measurements at Reporting
Date Using
     March 31,
2008
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)

Assets:

        

Government debt securities

   $ 39,540    $ 39,540    $ —  

Corporate debt securities

     49,153      38,775      10,378

Municipal debt securities

     51,524      13,773      37,751

Foreign debt securities

     512      512      —  
                    

Total assets:

   $ 140,729    $ 92,600    $ 48,129
                    
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki