|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the PBR 20-F filed May 22, 2009. Asset
Retirement Obligations and Environmental Remediation
Under various contracts, permits and regulations, we have
material legal obligations to remove equipment and restore the
land or seabed at the end of operations at production sites. Our
most significant asset removal obligations involve removal and
disposal of offshore oil and gas production facilities
worldwide. We accrue the estimated discounted costs of
dismantling and removing these facilities at the time of
installation of the assets. We also estimate costs for future
environmental
clean-up and
remediation activities based on current information on costs and
expected plans for remediation. The aggregate amount of
estimated costs on a discounted basis for asset retirement and
environmental remediation provision at December 31, 2008
was U.S.$2,825 million. Estimating asset retirement,
removal and environmental remediation costs requires performing
complex calculations that necessarily involve significant
judgment because our obligations are many years in the future,
the contracts and regulation have vague descriptions of what
removal and remediation practices and criteria will have to be
met when the removal and remediation events actually occur and
asset removal technologies and costs are constantly changing,
along with political, environmental, safety and public relations
considerations. Consequently, the timing and amounts of future
cash flows are subject to significant uncertainty. However,
given the significant amount of time to the ultimate retirement
date, any modifications in
93
Table of Contents
technological specifications, legal requirement, or other
matters, would not have a materially adverse effect on any one
reporting period.
In 2008, we reviewed and revised our estimated costs associated
with well abandonment and the demobilization of oil and gas
production areas, considering new information about date of
expected abandonment and revised cost estimates to abandon. The
changes to estimated asset retirement obligation were
principally related to declaration of new fields as economically
viable, certain changes in revised cost estimates to abandon
provided by non-operated joint-ventures. A summary of the annual
changes in the abandonment provisions is presented in
Note 9(a) to our audited consolidated financial statements,
as of December 31, 2008.
This excerpt taken from the PBR 20-F filed Jun 30, 2005. Asset Retirement Obligations and Environmental Remediation
Under various contracts, permits and regulations, we have material legal obligations to remove equipment and restore the land or seabed at the end of operations at production sites. Our most significant asset removal obligations involve removal and disposal of offshore oil and gas production facilities worldwide. We accrue the estimated discounted costs of dismantling and removing these facilities at the time of installation of the assets. We also estimate costs for future environmental clean-up and remediation activities based on current information on costs and expected plans for remediation. The aggregate amount of estimated costs on a discounted basis for asset retirement and environmental remediation accrued at December 31, 2004 was U.S.$403 million. Estimating asset retirement, removal and environmental remediation costs requires performing complex calculations that necessarily involve significant judgment because our obligations are many years in the future, the contracts and regulation shave vague descriptions of what removal and remediation practices and criteria will have to be met when the removal and remediation events actually occur and asset removal technologies and costs are constantly changing, along with political, environmental, safety and public relations considerations. Consequently, the timing and amounts of future cash flows are subject to significant uncertainty. However, given the significant amount of time to the ultimate retirement date, any modifications in technological specifications, legal requirement, or other matters, would not have a materially adverse effect on any one reporting period.
In 2004, we reviewed and revised our estimated costs associated with well abandonment and the demobilization of oil and gas production areas, considering new information about date of expected abandonment and revised cost estimates to abandon. The changes to estimated asset retirement obligation were principally related to changing expectations about Brent prices, which led the correlated fields to have longer economic lives. This review resulted in a decrease in the related provision of US$ 196 million with a gain recognized in net income, and recorded in the line titled exploratory costs for oil and gas exploration. See note 2(i) to our audited consolidated financial statements.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for PBR: |
| |||||||