PBR » Topics » 22.2 Legal proceedings not provisioned for

This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Nov 19, 2009.

22.2 Legal proceedings not provisioned for

We present below the updated situation of the main legal proceedings with chances of possible loss:

Description    Current situation 
 
Plaintiff: Porto Seguro Imóveis Ltda. 

Nature: Civil
 

Porto Seguro, a minority shareholder of Petroquisa, filed a lawsuit against Petrobras, related to alleged losses arising from the sale of the shareholding interests of Petroquisa in various petrochemical companies included in the National Privatization Program. The plaintiff filed the aforesaid lawsuit to obtain an order obliging Petrobras, as the majority shareholder of Petroquisa, to compensate for the "loss" inflicted on the equity of Petroquisa, through the acts which approved the minimum sales price of its shareholding interest in the capital of the privatized companies. 
On March 30, 2004 the Court of Appeals of Rio de Janeiro unanimously granted the new appeal lodged by Porto Seguro, ordering Petrobras to indemnify an amount equal to US$ 2.370 million, plus 5% as a premium and 20% as lawyers' fees. 

Petrobras filed a special, extraordinary appeal before the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and before the Federal Supreme Court (STF), which were rejected. Petrobras then filed an interlocutory appeal against the decision before the Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court. 

In accordance with the decision published on June 5, 2006, Petrobras is now awaiting assignment of the agenda to re- examine the matter related to the blocking of Petrobras' special appeal before the Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court. 

Based on the opinion of its legal counsel, the company does not expect an unfavorable outcome to these proceedings. 

If the situation is not reversed, the estimated indemnification to Petroquisa, including monetary correction and interest, would be R$ 15.440.097 thousand as of September 30, 2009. As Petrobras owns 100% of the capital of Petroquisa, part of the indemnification to Petroquisa, estimated at R$ 10.190.464 thousand, will not represent an actual disbursement from the Petrobras System. Additionally, Petrobras would have to indemnify Porto Seguro, the plaintive, R$ 772.005 thousand as a premium and R$ 3.088.020 thousand as lawyers' fees. 
 
 
Â
Plaintiff: Federal Revenue Department of Rio de Janeiro 

Nature: Tax 

Tax deficiency notice related to withholding income tax (IRRF) calculated on remittances of payments for affreightment of vessels referring to the period from 1999 to 2002. 
Petrobras submitted new administrative appeals to the Higher Chamber of Tax Appeals, the highest administrative level, which are awaiting a hearing. 

Maximum updated exposure: R$ 4.360.982 thousand. 
 
Â
Plaintiff: Federal Revenue Inspectorate in Macaé 

Nature: Tax
 

Interest and fines on import duty (II) and excise tax (IPI) - Sinking of the P-36 platform 
Lower court decision against Petrobras. 

A spontaneous appeal has been filed which is awaiting a hearing. Petrobras filed a writ of security and obtained a favorable decision to stay any tax collections until the investigations determining the reasons that caused the platform to sink have been concluded. The Federal Government/National Treasury has filed an appeal which is awaiting a hearing. 

With the decision of the Maritime Court, the Company filed a tax debt annulment lawsuit and an injunction suspending collection of the tax. 

Maximum updated exposure: R$ 370.558 thousand. 

This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Aug 18, 2009.

22.2 Legal proceedings not provisioned for

We present, below, the updated situation of the main legal proceedings with chances of possible loss:

Description    Current situation 
 
Plaintiff: Porto Seguro Imóveis Ltda.
Nature: Civil
Porto Seguro, a minority shareholder of Petroquisa, filed a lawsuit against Petrobras, related to alleged losses arising from the sale of the shareholding interests of Petroquisa in various petrochemical companies included in the National Privatization Program. The plaintiff filed the aforesaid lawsuit to obtain an order obliging Petrobras, as the majority shareholder of Petroquisa, to compensate for the “loss” inflicted on the equity of Petroquisa, through the acts which approved the minimum sales price of its shareholding interest in the capital of the privatized companies. 
  On March 30, 2004 the Court of Appeals of Rio de Janeiro unanimously granted the new appeal lodged by Porto Seguro, ordering Petrobras to indemnify an amount equal to US$ 2.370 million, plus 5% as a premium and 20% as lawyers’ fees. 
Petrobras filed a special, extraordinary appeal before the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the Federal Supreme Court (STF), which were rejected. Petrobras then filed an interlocutory appeal against the decision before the Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court. 
In accordance with the decision published on June 5, 2006, Petrobras is now awaiting assignment of the agenda to re- examine the matter related to the blocking of Petrobras’ special appeal before the Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court. 
Based on the opinion of its legal counsel, the Company does not expect an unfavorable outcome to these proceedings. 
If the situation is not reversed, the estimated indemnification to Petroquisa, including monetary restatement and interest, would be R$ 14.881.530 thousand as of June 30, 2009. As Petrobras owns 100% of the capital of Petroquisa, part of the indemnification to Petroquisa, estimated at R$ 9.821.810 thousand, will not represent an actual disbursement from the Petrobras System. Additionally, Petrobras would have to indemnify Porto Seguro, the plaintive, R$ 744.077 thousand as a premium and R$ 2.976.306 thousand as lawyers’ fees to Lobo & Ibeas Advogados. 
 
Plaintiff: Federal Revenue Department of Rio de Janeiro 
Nature: Tax
Tax deficiency notice related to withholding income tax (IRRF) calculated on remittances of payments for affreightment of vessels referring to the period from 1999 to 2002. 
  Petrobras submitted new administrative appeals to the Higher Chamber of Tax Appeals, the highest administrative level, which are awaiting a hearing. 
Maxim updated exposure: R$ 4.328.481 thousand. 
 
This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Jun 8, 2009.

22.2 Legal proceedings not provisioned for

We present below the updated situation of the main legal proceedings with chances of possible loss:

Description    Current situation 
 
Plaintiff: Porto Seguro Imóveis Ltda.
Nature: Civil
Porto Seguro, a minority shareholder of Petroquisa, filed a lawsuit against Petrobras, related to alleged interests of Petroquisa in various petrochemical companies included in the National Privatization Program. The plaintiff filed the aforesaid lawsuit to obtain an order obliging Petrobras, as the majority shareholder of Petroquisa, to compensate for the "loss" inflicted on the equity of Petroquisa, through the acts which approved the minimum sales price of its shareholding interest in the capital of the privatized companies.
  On March 30, 2004 the Court of Appeals of Rio de Janeiro unanimously granted the new appeal lodged by Porto Seguro, ordering Petrobras to indemnify an amount equal to US$ 2.370 million, plus 5% as a premium and 20% as lawyers' fees.
Petrobras filed a special, extraordinary appeal before the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the Federal Supreme Court (STF), which were rejected. Petrobras then filed an interlocutory appeal against the decision before the Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court. In accordance with the decision published on June 5, 2006, Petrobras is now awaiting assignment of the agenda to re- examine the matter related to the blocking of Petrobras' special appeal before the STJ and STF.
Based on the opinion of its legal counsel, the company does not expect an unfavorable outcome to these proceedings.
If the situation is not reversed, the estimated indemnification to Petroquisa, including monetary correction and interest, wo uld be R$ 14.260.404 thousand as of March 31, 2009. As Petrobras owns 100% of the capital of Petroquisa, part of the indemnification to Petroquisa, estimated at R$ 9.411.866 thousand, will not represent an actual disbursement from the Petrobras System. Additionally, Petrobras would have to indemnify Porto Seguro, the plaintive, R$ 713.020 thousand as a premium and R$ 2.852.081 thousand as lawyers' fees to Lobo & Ibeas Advogados.
 
Plaintiff: Federal Revenue Department of Rio de Janeiro 
Nature: Tax
Tax deficiency notice related to withholding income tax (IRRF) calculated on remittances of payments for affreightments of vessels referring to the period from 1999 to 2002. 
  Petrobras submitted new administrative appeals to the Higher Chamber of Tax Appeals, the highest administrative level, which are awaiting a hearing.
Maxim updated exposure: R$ 4.291.046 thousand.
 
Plaintiff: Federal Revenue Inspectorate in Macaé 
Nature: Tax 
Interest and fines on import duty (II) and excise tax (IPI) - Sinking of the P-36 platform. 
  Lower court decision against Petrobras
A spontaneous appeal has been filed which is awaiting a hearing. Petrobras filed a writ of security and obtained a favorable decision to stay any tax collections until the investigations determining the reasons that caused the
 

This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Nov 12, 2008.

21.2 Legal proceedings not provisioned for

We present below the updated situation as of September 30, 2008 of the main legal proceedings with a likelihood of possible loss:

Description    Current situation 
   
 
Plaintiff: Porto Seguro Imóveis Ltda.    On March 30, 2004, the Court of Appeals of Rio de Janeiro unanimously granted the new appeal lodged by Porto Seguro, ordering Petrobras to indemnify Petroquisa an amount equal to US$ 2.370 million plus 5% as a premium and 20% as lawyers’ fees. 
   
Nature: Civil   
   
Porto Seguro, a minority shareholder of Petroquisa, filed a lawsuit against Petrobras, related to alleged losses arising from the sale of the shareholding interest held by Petroquisa in various petrochemical companies in the National Privatization Programme. The plaintiff filed the aforesaid lawsuit to obtain an order obliging Petrobras, as the majority shareholder   of Petroquisa, to compensate for the “loss” inflicted on the equity of Petroquisa, through the acts which approved the minimum sale price of its shareholding interest in the capital of the privatized companies.    Petrobras filed a special, extraordinary appeal before the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the Federal Supreme Court (STF), which were rejected. Petrobras then filed an Interlocutory Appeal against this decision before the Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court. 
 
 
   
  In accordance with the decision published on June 5, 2006, Petrobras is now awaiting assignment of the agenda to re-examine the matter related to the blocking of Petrobras’ Special Appeal before the STJ and STF. 
 
 
 
   
  Based on the opinion of its legal counsel, the Company does not expect an unfavorable outcome to these proceedings. 
 
   
   
  It the situation is not reversed, the estimated indemnity to Petroquisa, including monetary correction and interest, would be R$ 13.149.391 thousand at September 30, 2008. As Petrobras owns 100% of the capital of Petroquisa, part of the indemnity, estimated at R$ 8.678.598 thousand, will not represent an actual disbursement from the Petrobras System. Additionally, Petrobras would have to indemnify Porto Seguro, the plaintiff, R$ 657.470 thousand as a premium and R$ 2.629.878 thousand as lawyers fees to Lobo & Ibeas Advogados. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiff: Federal Revenue Department of Rio de Janeiro    Petrobras submitted new administrative appeals to the Higher Chamber of Tax Appeals, the highest administrative level, which are awaiting a hearing. 
   
Nature: Tax   
     
Tax deficiency notice related to Withholding Income Tax (IRRF)calculated on remittances of payments for afreightment of vessels referring to the period of 1999 to 2002.    Updated maximum exposure: R$ 4.199.263 thousand. 
   
   
   
   

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki