PBR » Topics » 12.5 Litigations abroad

This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Aug 18, 2009.

12.5 Litigations abroad

a) In the United States - P-19 and P-31

On July 25, 2002, Braspetro Oil Service Company (Brasoil) and Petrobras won related lawsuits filed with the US lower courts by the insurance companies United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company and American Home Assurance Company since 1997. A court decision by the Federal Court of the Southern District of New York recognized the right of Brasoil and Petrobras to receive indemnity for losses and damages in the amount of US$ 237 million, plus interest and reimbursement of legal expenses on the date of effective receipt related to the performance bond, totaling, approximately, US$ 370 million. An appeal filed by the insurance companies removed the obligation by the insurance companies with respect to payment of the fine, legal fees and costs, thus reducing the amount of the indemnity to US$ 245 million.

On July 21, 2006, the US court handed down an executive decision, conditioning the payment of the amounts owed to Brasoil to the permanent closing of legal proceedings involving identical claims in progress before the Brazilian courts, which the parties proceeded to do.

b) In London – P-36

In relation to the sinking of Platform P-36 in 2001, in the contracts related to the building of the platform, Brasoil and Petrobras, in accordance with a mechanism agreed to contractually, are obliged to deposit the compensation in the event of a claim in favor of a security agent for payment to the creditors. Litigation filed by creditors of part of these payments, which Brasoil and Petrobras understand to be their rights, is in progress in the London courts.

This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Jun 8, 2009.

12.6 Litigations abroad

a) In the United States - P-19 and P-31

On July 25, 2002, Braspetro Oil Service Company (Brasoil) and Petrobras won related lawsuits filed with the US Lower Courts by the insurance companies United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company and American Home Assurance Company since 1997. A court decision by the Federal Court of the Southern District of New York recognized the right of Brasoil and Petrobras to receive indemnity for losses and damages in the amount of US$ 237 million, plus interest and reimbursement of legal expenses on the date of effective receipt related to the performance bond, totaling approximately US$ 370 million. However, an appeal filed by the insurance companies removed the obligation by the insurance companies with respect to payment of the fine, legal fees and costs, thus reducing the amount of the indemnity to US$ 245 million.

On July 21, 2006, the US Court handed down an executive decision, conditioning the payment of the amounts owed to Brasoil to the permanent closing of legal proceedings involving identical claims in progress before the Brazilian Courts, which the parties proceeded to do.

b) In London - P-36

In relation to the sinking of Platform P-36 in 2001, in the contracts related to the building of the platform, Brasoil and Petrobras, in accordance with a mechanism agreed to contractually, are obliged to deposit the compensation in the event of a claim in favor of a Security Agent for payment to the creditors. Litigation filed by creditors of part of these payments, which Brasoil and Petrobras understand to be their rights, is in progress in the London Courts.

At the current stage of the litigation, Petromec, the contractual party involved, filed a claim against Brasoil and Petrobras in the amount of US$ 154 million, plus interest, on September 29, 2008. The defense for Brasoil and Petrobras should be filed in May 2009. The hearing of Petromec's claim should take place in 2010.

c) Other litigation for indemnification

In the construction/conversion of ships into vessels for FPSO and FSO, Brasoil transferred financial resources in the amount of US$ 627 million, equivalent to R$ 1.451.849 thousand at March 31, 2009 (R$ 1.460.583 thousand at December 31, 2008) directly to its suppliers and subcontractors, with the aim of avoiding delays in the construction/conversion of vessels and, consequently, losses to Brasoil.

This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Mar 31, 2009.

14.6 Litigations abroad

a) In the United States - P-19 and P-31

On July 25, 2002, Braspetro Oil Service Company (Brasoil) and Petrobras won related lawsuits filed since 1997 with the US lower courts by the insurance companies United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company and American Home Assurance Company. A court decision by the Federal Court of the Southern District of New York recognized the right of Brasoil and Petrobras to receive indemnity for losses and damages in the amount of US$ 237 million, plus interest and reimbursement of legal expenses on the date of effective receipt related to the performance bond, totalling approximately US$ 370 million. However, an appeal filed by the insurance companies removed the obligation by the insurance companies with respect to payment of the fine, legal fees and costs, thus reducing the amount of the indemnity to US$ 245 million.

On July 21, 2006, the US court handed down an executive decision, conditioning the payment of the amounts owed to Brasoil to the permanent closing of legal proceedings involving identical claims in progress before the Brazilian courts, which the parties proceeded to do.

78


Table of Contents


b) In London - P-36

With respect to the sinking of Platform P-36 in 2001, in the contracts with respect to the building of the platform, Brasoil and Petrobras were obliged to deposit the insurance compensation, in the event of a claim, in favor of a security agent for payment to the creditors, in accordance with a mechanism adjusted contractually. Litigation brought by the companies that consider they are creditors of part of these payments, that Brasoil and Petrobras understand to be their right, are in process before the London courts.

At the current stage of the proceedings, Petromec, the contractual party involved, filed a claim against Brasoil and Petrobras in the amount of US$ 154 million, plus interest, on September 29, 2008. The defence for Brasoil and Petrobras should be filed in May 2009. The hearing of Petromec’s claim should take place in 2010.

c) Other litigation for indemnification

In the construction/conversion of ships into vessels for Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) and Floating, Storage and Offloading (FSO), Brasoil transferred financial resources in the amount of US$ 624 million, equivalent to R$ 1.460.583 at December 31, 2008 (R$ 1.092.067 at December 31, 2007) directly to its suppliers and subcontractors, with the aim of avoiding delays in the construction/conversion of vessels and, consequently, losses to Brasoil.

Based on the opinions of Brasoil’s legal advisers, these expenditures are liable to reimbursement by the constructors, which is the reason why litigations for financial indemnification were filed in international courts. However, conservatively, the portion of this balance not covered by real guarantees, in the amount of US$ 553 million, equivalent to R$ 1.292.223 at December 31, 2008 (R$ 964.460 at December 31, 2007) is recorded as an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki