|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
PBR » Topics » Search and apprehension of ICMS tax payments considered to be not due / taxpayer substitutionThis excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Nov 17, 2006. Search and apprehension of ICMS tax payments considered to be not due / taxpayer substitution PETROBRAS was sued in court by certain oil distribution companies under the allegation that it did not pass on to state governments the State Value-Added Tax (ICMS) collected according to the legislation upon fuel sales. These suits were filed in the states of Goiás, Tocantins, Bahia, Pará, Maranhão and in the Federal District. Of the total amount related to legal actions of approximately R$ 895.795 thousand, up to September 30, 2006, R$ 80.159 thousand had been withdrawn from the Companys accounts as a result of judicial rulings of advance relief, which were annulled as a result of an appeal filed by the Company. PETROBRAS, with the support of the state and federal authorities, has succeeded in stopping the execution of other withdrawals, and is making all efforts possible to obtain reimbursement of the amounts that had been unduly withdrawn from its accounts. This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Aug 25, 2006. Search and apprehension of ICMS tax payments considered to be not due / taxpayer substitution PETROBRAS was sued in court by certain oil distribution companies under the allegation that it did not pass on to state governments the State Value-Added Tax (ICMS) collected according to the legislation upon fuel sales. These suits were filed in the states of Goiás, Tocantins, Bahia, Pará, Maranhão and in the Federal District. Of the total amount related to legal actions of approximately R$ 895.795 thousand, up to June 30, 2006, R$ 80.159 thousand had been withdrawn from the Companys accounts as a result of judicial rulings of advance relief, which were annulled as a result of an appeal filed by the Company. PETROBRAS, with the support of the state and federal authorities, has succeeded in stopping the execution of other withdrawals, and is making all efforts possible to obtain reimbursement of the amounts that had been unduly withdrawn from its accounts. This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Jun 26, 2006. Search and apprehension of ICMS tax payments considered to be not due/taxpayer substitution PETROBRAS was sued in court by certain small oil distribution companies under the allegation that it does not pass on to state governments the State Value-Added Tax (ICMS) collected according to the legislation upon fuel sales. These suits were filed in the states of Goiás, Tocantins, Bahia, Pará, Maranhão and in the Federal District. Of the total amount related to legal actions of approximately R$ 895.795 thousand, up to March 31, 2006, R$ 80.159 thousand had been withdrawn from the Companys accounts as a result of judicial rulings of advance relief, which were annulled as a result of an appeal filed by the Company. PETROBRAS, with the support of the state and federal authorities, has succeeded in stopping the execution of other withdrawals, and is making all efforts possible to obtain reimbursement of the amounts that had been unduly withdrawn from its accounts. This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Aug 19, 2005. Search and apprehension of ICMS tax payments considered to be not due/taxpayer substitution PETROBRAS was sued in court by certain small oil distribution companies under the allegation that it does not pass on to state governments the State Value-Added Tax (ICMS) collected according to the legislation upon fuel sales. These suits were filed in the states of Goiás, Tocantins, Bahia, Pará, Maranhão and in the Federal District. Of the total amount related to legal actions of approximately R$ 895.795 thousand, up to June 30, 2005 R$ 80.159 thousand had been withdrawn from the Companys accounts as a result of judicial rulings of advance relief, which were annulled as a result of an appeal filed by the Company. PETROBRAS, with the support of state and federal authorities, succeeded in impeding other withdrawals and is endeavoring to obtain refund for the amounts that were unduly withdrawn from its accounts. 24 This excerpt taken from the PBR 6-K filed Mar 18, 2005. Search and apprehension of ICMS tax payments considered to be not due/taxpayer substitution PETROBRAS was sued in court by certain small oil distribution companies under the allegation that it does not pass on to state governments the State Value-Added Tax (ICMS) collected according to the legislation upon fuel sales. These suits were filed in the states of Goiás, Tocantins, Bahia, Pará, Maranhão and in the Federal District. Of the total amount related to legal actions of approximately R$ 895.795, up to December 31, 2004 R$ 74.875 had been withdrawn from the Companys accounts as a result of judicial rulings of advance relief, which were annulled as a result of an appeal filed by the Company. PETROBRAS, with the support of the state and federal authorities, has succeeded in stopping the execution of other withdrawals, and is making all efforts possible to obtain reimbursement of the amounts that had been unduly withdrawn from its accounts. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||