|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
These excerpts taken from the PRVT 10-K filed Apr 15, 2009. 15. Commitments and contingent liabilities The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain of these leases contain renewal options. Rental payments under these leases are charged to operations on a straight-line basis with any differential recognized as deferred rent in the balance sheet. The rental payments under these leases are charged to operations as incurred. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 amounted to EUR 692 thousand, EUR 701 thousand and EUR 879 thousand, respectively. Future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2008 are as follows:
15. Commitments and contingent liabilities STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain of these leases contain renewal options. Rental paymentsunder these leases are charged to operations on a straight-line basis with any differential recognized as deferred rent in the balance sheet. The rental payments under these leases are charged to operations as incurred. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 amounted to EUR 692 thousand, EUR 701 thousand and EUR 879 thousand, respectively. SIZE="2">Future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2008 are as follows:
These excerpts taken from the PRVT 10-K filed Mar 17, 2008. 14. Commitments and contingent liabilities The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain of these leases contain renewal options. Rental payments under these leases are charged to operations on a straight-line basis with any differential recognized as deferred rent in the balance sheet. The rental payments under these leases are charged to operations as incurred. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 amounted to EUR 651 thousand, EUR 692 thousand and EUR 701 thousand, respectively.
F - 19
PRIVATE MEDIA GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:
14. Commitments and contingent liabilities SIZE="2">The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain of these leases contain renewal options. Rental payments under these leases are charged to operations on a straight-line basis with any
F - 19 PRIVATE MEDIA GROUP, INC. ALIGN="center">NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:
This excerpt taken from the PRVT 10-K filed Apr 2, 2007. 14. Commitments and contingent liabilities The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain of these leases contain
F - 19
PRIVATE MEDIA GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
renewal options. Rental payments under these leases are charged to operations on a straight-line basis with any differential recognized as deferred rent in the balance sheet. The rental payments under these leases are charged to operations as incurred. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 amounted to EUR 967 thousand, EUR 651 thousand and EUR 692 thousand, respectively. Future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:
In December 1999 the Company received final notification from the Swedish Tax Authority assessing its subsidiary in Cyprus for the tax years 1995-1998 for a total amount of SEK 42,000,000 (approx. EUR 4.5 million) plus fines amounting to SEK 16,800,000 (approx. EUR 1.8 million) plus interest. The Swedish Tax Authority has taken the position that the subsidiary carried on business in Sweden from a permanent establishment during the period in question and should therefore be taxed on the income attributable to the permanent establishment. The case is under litigation and the Company believes the circumstances supporting the Tax Authoritys claim are without merit. However, the Administrative Court of Appeal has decided that a permanent establishment is at hand. The Court has only made a principle statement and the question how to calculate any eventual profit that can be allocated to the permanent establishment is not decided by the Court at this stage. The Company has appealed against the decision. The final outcome of this litigation will not be known for several years. Due to the early stages of this matter and the uncertainty regarding the ultimate decision, no amounts have been provided in the Companys financial statements for this dispute.
F - 20
PRIVATE MEDIA GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This excerpt taken from the PRVT 10-K filed Mar 31, 2006. 18. Commitments and contingent liabilities The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain of these leases contain renewal options. Rental payments under these leases are charged to operations on a straight-line basis with any differential recognized as deferred rent in the balance sheet. The rental payments under these leases are charged to operations as incurred. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 amounted to EUR 931 thousand, EUR 967 thousand and EUR 651 thousand, respectively.
F - 25
PRIVATE MEDIA GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2005 are as follows:
In December 1999 the Company received final notification from the Swedish Tax Authority assessing its subsidiary in Cyprus for the tax years 1995-1998 for a total amount of SEK 42,000,000 (approx. EUR 4.5 million) plus fines amounting to SEK 16,800,000 (approx. EUR 1.8 million) plus interest. The Swedish Tax Authority has taken the position that the subsidiary carried on business in Sweden from a permanent establishment during the period in question and should therefore be taxed on the income attributable to the permanent establishment. The case is under litigation and the Company believes the circumstances supporting the Tax Authoritys claim are without merit. However, the Administrative Court of Appeal has decided that a permanent establishment is at hand. The Court has only made a principle statement and the question how to calculate any eventual profit that can be allocated to the permanent establishment is not decided by the Court at this stage. The Company has appealed against the decision. The final outcome of this litigation will not be known for several years. Due to the early stages of this matter and the uncertainty regarding the ultimate decision, no amounts have been provided in the Companys financial statements for this dispute. This excerpt taken from the PRVT 10-K filed Mar 31, 2005. 17. Commitments and contingent liabilities
The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain of these leases contain renewal options. Rental payments under these leases are charged to operations on a straight-line basis with any differential recognized as deferred rent in the balance sheet. The rental payments under these leases are charged to operations as incurred. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 amounted to EUR 849 thousand, EUR 931 thousand and EUR 967 thousand, respectively.
F - 23
PRIVATE MEDIA GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
In December 1999 the Company received final notification from the Swedish Tax Authority assessing its subsidiary in Cyprus for the tax years 1995-1998 for a total amount of SEK 42,000,000 (approx. EUR 4.5 million) plus fines amounting to SEK 16,800,000 (approx. EUR 1.8 million) plus interest. The Swedish Tax Authority has taken the position that the subsidiary carried on business in Sweden from a permanent establishment during the period in question and should therefore be taxed on the income attributable to the permanent establishment. The case is under litigation and the Company believes the circumstances supporting the Tax Authoritys claim are without merit. However, the County Court has decided that a permanent establishment is at hand. The Court has only made a principle statement and the question how to calculate any eventual profit that can be allocated to the permanent establishment is not decided by the Court at this stage. The Company has appealed against the decision. The final outcome of this litigation will not be known for several years. Due to the early stages of this matter and the uncertainty regarding the ultimate decision, no amounts have been provided in the Companys financial statements for this dispute.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for PRVT: |
| |||||||