ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-14837
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
75-2756163
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
777 West Rosedale St., Fort Worth, Texas
76104
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
817-665-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Share Purchase Rights,
$0.01 par value per share
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer þ
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2008, the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $4,067,732,259 based on the closing sale price of $38.64 as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Class
Outstanding at February 13, 2009
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
168,752,835 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document
Parts Into Which Incorporated
Proxy Statement for the Registrants May 20,
Part III
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Explanatory Note
This Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quicksilver Resources Inc.
(Quicksilver) for the year ended December 31, 2008, originally filed on March 3, 2009 (Original
Form 10-K) is being filed to provide audited financial statements and footnotes in
accordance with SEC Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X for the following entities:
Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc. (QRCI);
Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc.; and
Quicksilver Gas Services Holdings LLC.
In addition, this Amendment No. 2 includes the audited
financial statements and related footnotes of
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. (BBEP), which were filed as an exhibit under Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules of Amendment No. 1 to the Original Form
10-K. The management of BBEP is solely responsible for the form and content of the
BBEP financial statements.
Quicksilver has no
responsibility for the form or content of the BBEP financial statements since it does not control
BBEP and is not involved in the management of BBEP.
The consents of Schlumberger Data and Consulting
Services, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., Deloitte and Touche LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP and new certifications of Quicksilvers principal chief executive officer and principal
financial officer are also filed as exhibits to this Amendment No. 2 under Item 15.
This Amendment No. 2 does not
reflect events occurring after March 3, 2009. This Amendment also
does not update or modify in any way Quicksilvers results of operations,
financial position, cash
flows or other disclosures in the Original Form 10-K.
(i)
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statement Schedules
The following Consolidated Financial Statements and related footnotes are filed as part of this report:
i.)
Audited financial statements and related footnotes of Quicksilver Resources Canada
Inc. (QRCI) for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
(1)
ii.)
Consolidated audited financial statements and related footnotes of Cowtown Pipeline Funding Inc.
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. (1)
iii.)
Consolidated audited financial statements and related footnotes of Quicksilver Gas Services
Holdings LLC for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
(1)
iv.)
Consolidated audited financial statements and related footnotes of Quicksilvers
equity method investment in BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. (BBEP). (2)
(1)
The audited financial statements of QRCI, Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc.
and Quicksilver Gas Services Holdings LLC are being filed in
accordance with SEC Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X.
(2)
The audited financial statements and related footnotes of Quicksilvers equity
method investment in BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. are being filed in accordance with SEC Rule
3-09 of Regulation S-X.
(ii)
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES CANADA INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ending December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc.
Fort Worth, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc.
and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders equity and of cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
have been prepared from the separate records maintained by Quicksilver Resources Inc. and may not necessarily be indicative of
the conditions that would have existed or the results of operations if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated entity.
Portions of certain expenses represent allocations made from, and are applicable to, Quicksilver Resources Inc. as a whole.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
May 29, 2009
2
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES CANADA INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007
In thousands
2008
2007
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
866
$
89
Accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts
29,169
38,648
Advances to Quicksilver
30
118
Derivative assets at fair value
59,245
419
Other current assets
13,063
18,739
Total current assets
102,373
58,013
Investment
in equity affiliate at cost
68,604
Property, plant and equipment
Oil and gas properties, full cost method (including
unevaluated costs of $9,832 and $21,170, respectively)
437,563
533,401
Other property and equipment
42,585
38,566
Property, plant and equipment net
480,148
571,967
Other assets
910
1,205
$
652,035
$
631,185
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
$
19,587
$
9,396
Accrued liabilities
7,612
21,679
Derivative liabilities at fair value
1,865
Deferred income taxes
15,843
62
Total current liabilities
44,907
31,137
Long-term debt
252,868
310,710
Asset retirement obligations
17,608
14,278
Deferred income taxes
56,948
46,572
Stockholders equity
Common stock
1,817
1,817
Paid in capital in excess of par value
28,118
28,118
Accumulated other comprehensive income
33,809
43,870
Retained earnings
215,960
154,683
Total stockholders equity
279,704
228,488
$
652,035
$
631,185
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES CANADA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
In thousands
2008
2007
2006
Revenue
Natural gas, NGL and crude oil
$
181,994
$
154,372
$
117,831
Other
4,840
6,174
721
Total revenue
186,834
160,546
118,552
Operating expenses
Oil and gas production expense
38,153
35,931
26,237
Depletion, depreciation and accretion
44,821
39,287
29,012
General and administrative
3,673
2,499
1,790
Total expenses
86,647
77,717
57,039
Operating income
100,187
82,829
61,513
Other income (expense) net
(2,994
)
(427
)
108
Interest expense
(13,978
)
(14,773
)
(12,593
)
Income before income taxes
83,215
67,629
49,028
Income tax expense
(21,938
)
(11,129
)
(8,777
)
Net income
$
61,277
$
56,500
$
40,251
Other comprehensive income
Reclassification adjustments related to
settlements of derivative contracts net of income tax
160
(18,043
)
(6,030
)
Net change in derivative fair value net of income tax
38,478
5,012
33,747
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(48,699
)
29,018
(1,236
)
Comprehensive income
$
51,216
$
72,487
$
66,732
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES CANADA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
In thousands
Accumulated
Additional
Other
Common
Paid-in
Comprehensive
Retained
Stock
Capital
Income
Earnings
Total
Balances at December 31, 2005
$
1,817
$
28,118
$
1,402
$
57,932
$
89,269
Net income
40,251
40,251
Hedge derivative contract settlements
reclassified into earnings from accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of
income tax of $3,636
(6,030
)
(6,030
)
Net change in derivative fair value,
net of income tax benefit of $17,884
33,747
33,747
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(1,236
)
(1,236
)
Balances at December 31, 2006
$
1,817
$
28,118
$
27,883
$
98,183
$
156,001
Net income
56,500
56,500
Hedge derivative contract settlements
reclassified into earnings from accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of
income tax of $7,550
(18,043
)
(18,043
)
Net change in derivative fair value,
net of income tax benefit of $2,229
5,012
5,012
Foreign currency translation adjustment
29,018
29,018
Balances at December 31, 2007
$
1,817
$
28,118
$
43,870
$
154,683
$
228,488
Net income
61,277
61,277
Hedge derivative contract settlements
reclassified into earnings from accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of
income tax benefit of $65
160
160
Net change in derivative fair value,
net of income tax of $15,715
38,478
38,478
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(48,699
)
(48,699
)
Balances at December 31, 2008
$
1,817
$
28,118
$
33,809
$
215,960
$
279,704
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
QUICKSILVER
RESOURCES CANADA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 In thousands
2008
2007
2006
Operating activities:
Net income
$
61,277
$
56,500
$
40,251
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion, depreciation and accretion
44,821
39,287
29,012
Deferred income tax expense
21,938
11,129
8,777
Non-cash loss from hedging and derivative activities
(2,544
)
(193
)
Loss from
the sale of equipment
936
Non-cash interest expense
295
297
316
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable
9,479
9,763
2,503
Advances
to/from Quicksilver
88
(446
)
(8,326
)
Other assets
2,324
(3,318
)
487
Accounts payable
1,977
(78
)
(2,928
)
Accrued liabilities
(2,650
)
(447
)
3,567
Net cash provided by operating activities
137,005
112,494
74,595
Investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(136,057
)
(147,195
)
(131,470
)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
618
3,778
Net cash used for investing activities
(135,439
)
(147,195
)
(127,692
)
Financing activities:
Issuance of debt
208,161
218,321
56,182
Repayment of debt
(209,734
)
(190,691
)
(9,908
)
Debt issuance costs
(664
)
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
(1,573
)
26,966
46,274
Effect of exchange rate changes in cash
784
5,423
(514
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash
777
(2,312
)
(7,337
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
89
2,401
9,738
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
866
$
89
$
2,401
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
QUICKSILVER RESOURCES CANADA INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation
Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc. (QRCI or the Company) was previously called MGV Energy
Inc., which was formed upon the amalgamation of MGV Energy Inc., Gatens Holdings Inc. and Voneiff
Holdings Inc. on August 19, 1999 under the Alberta Business Corporations Act. The name was changed
to Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc. on April 10, 2006. QRCI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Quicksilver Resources Inc. (Quicksilver or the parent company). QRCI is engaged in the
exploration, development and production of petroleum and natural gas reserves.
Basis of Presentation
A wholly-owned subsidiary of QRCI was dissolved December 15, 2006. The subsidiary did not hold
any assets at the time of dissolution. Prior to this date, the financial statements of QRCI were
consolidated and included the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. We eliminate all
inter-company balances and transactions in preparing consolidated financial statements. QRCI
accounts for its ownership in unincorporated partnerships and
companies under the cost method as
it has significant influence over those entities, but because of terms of the ownership agreements,
it does not meet the criteria for control which would trigger consolidation of the entities. QRCI
also consolidates its share of oil and gas joint ventures.
The QRCI financial statements presented herein have been
translated from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars as QRCI uses the
Canadian dollar as its functional currency. Unless otherwise noted, all financial information presented herein is reported in U.S. dollars.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the U.S. requires QRCIs
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses, including stock compensation expense,
during each reporting period. QRCIs management believes its estimates and assumptions are
reasonable; however, such estimates and assumptions are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from QRCIs estimates.
Significant estimates underlying these financial statements include the estimated quantities of
proved natural gas, NGL and crude oil reserves used to compute depletion expense and future net
cash flows from reserve production, estimates of current revenue based upon expectations for actual
deliveries and prices received, the estimated fair value of financial derivative instruments and
the estimated fair value of asset retirement obligations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of time deposits and liquid debt investments with original maturities
of three months or less at the time of purchase.
Accounts Receivable
The Companys customers are natural gas, NGL and crude oil purchasers. Each customer and/or
counterparty of the Company is reviewed as to credit worthiness prior to the extension of credit
and on a regular basis thereafter. Although the Company does not require collateral, appropriate
credit ratings are required and, in some instances, parental guarantees are obtained. Receivables
are generally due in 30-60 days. When collections of specific amounts due are no longer reasonably
assured, an allowance for doubtful accounts is established.
Hedging and Derivatives
Quicksilver enters into financial derivative instruments on behalf of QRCI to mitigate risk
associated with the prices received from its natural gas, NGL and crude oil production. All
derivatives are recognized as either an asset or liability on the balance sheet measured at their
fair value determined by reference to published future market prices and interest rates. For
derivatives instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of gains and
losses are deferred in other comprehensive income and recognized in revenue or interest expense in
the period in which the hedged transaction is
recognized. Gains or losses on derivative instruments terminated prior to their original
expiration date are deferred and
7
recognized as earnings during the period in which the hedged
transaction is recognized. If the hedged transaction becomes probable of not occurring, the
deferred gain or loss would be immediately recorded to earnings. Changes in value of ineffective
portions of hedges, if any, are recognized currently as a component of other revenue.
Parts and Supplies
Parts and supplies consist of well equipment, spare parts and supplies carried on a first-in,
first-out basis at the lower of cost or market.
Investments
in Equity Affiliates
QRCI accounts for its preferred interests in
1373159 Alberta Ltd. using the cost method. QRCI carries the investment at historical
cost and reviews the investment for impairment whenever circumstances or events
indicate that the investments carrying value will not be recoverable.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
QRCI follows the full cost method in accounting for its oil and gas properties. Under the
full cost method, all costs associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and
gas properties are capitalized and accumulated in a country-wide cost center. This includes any
internal costs that are directly related to development and exploration activities, but does not
include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.
Proceeds received from disposals are credited against accumulated cost except when the sale
represents a significant disposal of reserves, in which case a gain or loss is recognized. The sum
of net capitalized costs and estimated future development and dismantlement costs for each cost
center is depleted on the equivalent unit-of-production method, based on proved oil and gas
reserves. Excluded from amounts subject to depletion are costs associated with unevaluated
properties.
Under the full cost method, net capitalized costs are limited to the lower of unamortized cost
reduced by the related net deferred tax liability and asset retirement obligations or the cost
center ceiling. The cost center ceiling is defined as the sum of (i) estimated future net revenue,
discounted at 10% per annum, from proved reserves, based on unescalated year-end prices and costs,
adjusted for contract provisions, financial derivatives that hedge QRCIs oil and gas revenue and
asset retirement obligations, (ii) the cost of properties not being amortized, (iii) the lower of
cost or market value of unproved properties included in the cost being amortized less (iv) income
tax effects related to differences between the book and tax basis of the natural gas and crude oil
properties. If the net book value reduced by the related net deferred income tax liability and
asset retirement obligations exceeds the cost center ceiling limitation, a non-cash impairment
charge is required.
All other properties and equipment are stated at original cost and depreciated using the
straight-line method based on estimated useful lives ranging from five to forty years.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when title to the products transfer to the purchaser. QRCI uses the
sales method to account for its production revenue, whereby QRCI recognizes revenue on all
natural gas, NGL or crude oil sold to its purchasers, regardless of whether the sales are
proportionate to the Companys ownership in the property. A receivable or liability is recognized
only to the extent that the Company has an imbalance on a specific property greater than the
expected remaining proved reserves. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, QRCIs aggregate production
imbalances were not material.
Environmental Compliance and Remediation
Environmental compliance costs, including ongoing maintenance and monitoring, are expensed as
incurred. Environmental remediation costs, which improve the condition of a property, are
capitalized.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are established for all temporary differences between the book and the
tax basis of assets and liabilities. In addition, deferred tax balances must be adjusted to
reflect tax rates expected to be in effect in years in which the temporary differences reverse.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards
made to employees and directors based on their estimated fair value. At the discretion of
Quicksilvers board of directors, QRCI may issue awards payable in cash. For all awards, QRCI
recognizes the expense associated with the awards over the vesting period. The liability for fair
value of cash awards is reassessed at every balance sheet date, such that the vested portion of the
liability is adjusted to reflect revised fair value through compensation expense.
8
Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments
QRCIs financial instruments include cash, time deposits, accounts receivable, notes payable,
accounts payable, long-term debt and financial derivatives. The fair value of long-term debt is
estimated at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable
maturities for credit risk. The carrying amounts reflected in the balance sheet for financial
assets classified as current assets and the carrying amounts for financial liabilities classified
as current liabilities are recorded at cost which approximates fair value. SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, was adopted
on January 1, 2008 and applied to fair value measurements of the Companys financial instruments,
including its financial derivative instruments. Additional information regarding the Companys
implementation of the accounting standard is found under Recently Issued Accounting Standards in
this Note.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company uses the Canadian dollar as its functional currency. All balance sheet accounts
of QRCI are translated into U.S. dollars at the period-end rate of exchange and statement of income
items are translated at the weighted average exchange rates for the period. The resulting
translation adjustments are made directly to a component of accumulated other comprehensive income
within stockholders equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in
the statement of income.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Pronouncements Implemented During 2008
Adoption of SFAS No. 157 SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, was issued by the FASB in
September 2006. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement applies under
other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurement. No new requirements
are included in SFAS No. 157, but application of the Statement has changed current practice. On
February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2 (FSP 157-2) which delayed the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities. The delay allows
companies additional time to consider the effect of various implementation issues that have arisen,
or that may arise, from the application of SFAS No. 157. FSP FAS 157-3 was issued by the FASB on
October 10, 2008 to clarify application of SFAS No. 157 when determining the fair value of a
financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. QRCI adopted SFAS No. 157
on January 1, 2008 for new fair value measurements of financial instruments, including its
derivative instruments, and recurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and
liabilities. All financial instruments are measured using inputs from three levels of fair value
hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement
date.
Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market
corroborated inputs).
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys assumptions
about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability.
Adoption of SFAS No. 159 In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. While SFAS
No. 159 became effective on January 1, 2008, QRCI did not elect the fair value measurement option
for any of its financial assets or liabilities.
Adoption of
FSP FIN 39-1 On April 30, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN
39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 39. The FSP amends GAAP to replace the terms
conditional contracts and exchange contracts with the term derivative instruments as defined
in SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. It also amends
paragraph 10 of Interpretation 39 to permit a reporting entity to offset fair value amounts
recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master
netting arrangement. QRCI adopted FSP FIN 39-1 on January 1, 2008 without significant impact.
9
Adoption of SFAS No. 162 In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which identifies the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP in the United States. This Statement is generally viewed as a necessary step
in the ultimate convergence of global accounting rules. This Statement became effective on
November 15, 2008, but had no impact on QRCIs financial statements or related disclosures.
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, SFAS No. 141(R) was issued in December
2007. SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, while retaining its
fundamental requirements that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141(R)
defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control in the business combination and it
establishes the criteria to determine the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141(R) applies to all
transactions and events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. The
Statement also requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. In addition, acquisition costs are
required to be recognized as period expenses as incurred. The Statement will apply to any
acquisition entered into after January 1, 2009, but otherwise had no effect on QRCIs financial
statements upon adoption.
The FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
in March 2008. Under SFAS No. 161, the Company will be required to disclose the fair value of all
derivative and hedging instruments and their gains or losses in tabular format and information
about credit risk-related features in derivative agreements, counterparty credit risk, and its
strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments. SFAS No. 161 was adopted with
prospective application by the Company on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 will
change the Companys disclosures about its derivative and hedging instruments, but had no impact on
the Companys previously reported results or financial position.
10
2. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
As of December 31,
2008
2007
(In thousands)
Accrued production receivables
$
13,435
$
19,728
Joint interest receivables
15,386
16,150
Other receivables
348
2,770
$
29,169
$
38,648
3. DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described in SFAS No. 157, the following table
shows the fair value of QRCIs financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at
fair value as of December 31, 2008.
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2008
Balance Sheet
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Other(1)
Total
(in thousands)
Derivative assets
$
$
61,746
$
$
(2,501
)
$
59,245
Derivative liabilities
$
$
4,366
$
$
(2,501
)
$
1,865
(1)
Represents amounts netted under master netting
arrangements
The change in carrying value of QRCIs derivatives and the contractual fixed-price sale
commitments in the Companys balance sheet since December 31, 2007 principally resulted from the
decrease in market prices for natural gas to the prices in our derivative instruments and, to a
lesser degree, from settlements made during 2008. The change in fair value of the effective
portion of all cash flow hedges was reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
deferred tax effects. QRCI recognized $2.5 million and $0.2 million of net gains in other revenue
as the result of derivative hedge ineffectiveness for the years ended 2008 and 2007, respectively.
QRCI had no gains or losses resulting from derivative hedge ineffectiveness during 2006.
The estimated fair values of all derivatives of QRCI as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are
provided below. The associated carrying values of these derivatives are equal to the estimated
fair values for each period presented. The assets and liabilities recorded in the balance sheet
are netted where derivatives with both gain and loss positions are held by a single third party
where rights of offset exists.
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
December 31,
December 31,
2008
2007
2008
2007
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133
Commodity contracts reported in:
Current derivative assets
$
61,746
$
1,643
$
2,501
$
1,224
Current derivative liabilities
1,865
Total derivatives designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS 133
$
61,746
$
1,643
$
4,366
$
1,224
11
All hedge derivative assets and liabilities have been classified as current at December 31,
2008 based on the maturity of the derivative instruments, resulting in $38.8 million of after-tax
gains expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income in 2009.
The following table summarizes the open derivative positions that hedged QRCIs natural gas
production as of December 31, 2008:
Weighted Avg Price Per
Product
Type
Contract Period
Volume
MMBtu (1)
Fair Value
(MMBtud)
(In thousands)
Gas
Swap
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
10,000
$
8.45
$
8,536
Gas
Swap
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
20,000
8.46
17,110
Gas
Collar
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
10,000
8.25-10.45
8,290
Gas
Collar
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
10,000
8.25-10.45
8,290
Gas
Collar
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
10,000
11.50-14.48
19,520
Gas
Basis
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
20,000
(2
)
(1,865
)
Gas
Basis
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
20,000
(2
)
(932
)
Gas
Basis
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
15,000
(2
)
(799
)
Gas
Basis
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
15,000
(2
)
(770
)
Total
$
57,380
(1)
MMBtu means million British Thermal Units, a measure of heating value
(2)
Basis swaps for 60,000 MMBtu per day hedge the AECO (a natural
gas reference price for gas delivered onto NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. System in Alberta, Canada) basis adjustment at a weighted
average deduction of $0.84 per MMBtu from the New York Mercantile Exchange price for 2009.
4. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Other current assets consisted of the following:
As of December 31,
2008
2007
(In thousands)
Spare parts and supplies
$
11,399
$
14,751
Prepaid expenses
1,664
3,988
$
13,063
$
18,739
5. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY AFFILIATE
On February 4, 2008, QRCI sold its rights and interest in certain oil and gas leases,
purchased by QRCI in November 2007, to 1373159 Alberta Ltd. (1373159) for consideration of 10
million fully paid, non-assessable, non-voting Series 1 Preferred Shares of 1373159 having an
aggregate redemption price of approximately Canadian $30 million. In June 2008, QRCI sold its
rights and interests in additional oil and gas leases, purchased by QRCI in March 2008, to 1373159
for consideration of 10 million fully paid, non-assessable, non-voting Series 2 Preferred Shares of
1373159, having an aggregate redemption price of approximately Canadian $53 million. Quicksilver
owned 100% of 1373159, which was subsequently amalgamated by QRCI, effective January 1, 2009.
12
6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
December 31,
December 31,
2008
2007
(In thousands)
Oil and gas properties
Subject to depletion
$
547,249
$
616,192
Unevaluated costs
9,832
21,170
Accumulated depletion
(119,518
)
(103,961
)
Net oil and gas properties
437,563
533,401
Other plant and equipment
Pipelines and processing facilities
51,005
45,213
General properties
3,722
4,240
Accumulated depreciation
(12,142
)
(10,887
)
Net other property and equipment
42,585
38,566
Property, plant and equipment, net of
accumulated depletion and depreciation
$
480,148
$
571,967
Unevaluated Natural Gas and Crude Oil Properties Excluded From Depletion
Under full cost accounting, QRCI excludes certain unevaluated costs from the amortization base
pending determination of whether proved reserves have been discovered or impairment has occurred.
A summary of QRCIs unevaluated properties excluded from natural gas and crude oil properties being
amortized at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the year in which they were incurred is as follows:
December 31, 2008
December 31, 2007
Costs Incurred During
Costs Incurred During
2008
Prior
Total
2007
2006
2005
Prior
Total
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
Acquisition costs
$
$
$
$
626
$
720
$
575
$
7,085
$
9,006
Exploration costs
9,218
9,218
12,164
12,164
Capitalized interest
614
614
Total
$
9,832
$
$
9,832
$
12,790
$
720
$
575
$
7,085
$
21,170
Costs are transferred into the amortization base on an ongoing basis, as the projects are
evaluated and proved reserves established or impairment determined. Pending determination of
proved reserves attributable to the above costs, QRCI cannot assess the future impact on the
amortization rate.
Capitalized Costs
Capitalized overhead costs that directly relate to QRCIs exploration and development
activities were $4.4 million, $4.6 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
13
7. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
As of December 31,
2008
2007
(In thousands)
Accrued operating expenses
$
3,881
$
5,985
Accrued capital expenditures
11,417
Revenue payable
2,887
3,545
Prepayments from partners
844
732
$
7,612
$
21,679
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Quicksilvers
Senior Secured Credit Facility matures February 9, 2012, but has the option for
Quicksilver to extend the maturity up to two additional years with lender approval. The facility
provides for revolving loans, swingline loans and letters of credit from time to time in an
aggregate amount not to exceed the borrowing base, which is calculated based on several factors.
The borrowing base is subject to at least annual redeterminations. In September 2008, the lenders
agreed to a borrowing base of $1.2 billion. The lenders also agreed to $1.2 billion of revolving
credit commitments and, with lender approval, the Company has an option to increase the facility to
$1.45 billion. The lenders commitments under the facility are allocated between U.S. and Canadian
funds, with the U.S. currency available for borrowing by U.S. subsidiaries and either U.S. or
Canadian currency available for borrowing by QRCI. QRCI borrowings under the facility are
guaranteed by Quicksilver and most of Quicksilvers domestic subsidiaries and are secured by, among
other things, QRCIs, Quicksilvers and certain of Quicksilvers domestic subsidiaries oil and
gas properties and quantities of proved reserves of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil attributable to
them.
At December 31, 2008, QRCIs allocated borrowing base was $300 million with approximately $45
million of available borrowing capacity. All interest accrued on the facility must be paid
quarterly, but there is no fixed payment schedule. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at
the lenders prime rate. In April 2009, the lenders affirmed
Quicksilvers borrowing base at $1.2 billion and the
interest spreads under the facility were revised upward. QRCIs portion of the
borrowing base remained at $300 million.
14
9. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
QRCI records the fair value of the liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in
which it is legally or contractually incurred. Upon initial recognition of the asset retirement
liability, an asset retirement cost is capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the asset
by the same amount as the liability. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, the asset
retirement cost is recognized as expense through depletion or depreciation over the assets useful
life. Changes in the liability for the asset retirement obligations are recognized for (a) the
passage of time and (b) revisions to either the timing or the amount of estimated cash flows.
Accretion expense is recognized for the impacts of increasing the discounted fair value to its
estimated settlement value.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the estimated asset retirement
obligation from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2008.
December 31,
December 31,
2008
2007
(In thousands)
Beginning asset retirement obligations
$
14,278
$
10,117
Incremental liability incurred
1,651
1,586
Accretion expense
830
664
Change in estimates
3,928
Currency translation adjustment
(3,079
)
1,911
Ending asset retirement obligations
$
17,608
$
14,278
10. INCOME TAXES
Tax rate reductions were enacted during 2007 and 2006 by the Canadian federal government and
by Alberta Province. The Companys Canadian deferred income tax balances were revalued to reflect
the changes in these tax rates. The Company recorded
$6.3 million and $3.2 million of income tax
benefits in 2007 and 2006, respectively, as a result of the enactment of Canadian rate reductions.
No further rate changes were enacted in 2008. Significant components of the QRCIs deferred tax assets
and liabilities as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
As of December 31,
2008
2007
(In thousands)
Current
Deferred tax liability on cash flow hedge gains
$
15,843
$
62
Non-current
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carry forwards
$
1,644
$
2,033
Total deferred tax assets
1,644
2,033
Deferred tax liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
57,858
48,498
Other
734
107
Total deferred tax liabilities
58,592
48,605
Net deferred tax liabilities
$
56,948
$
46,572
15
The components of income tax expense for 2008, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
2008
2007
2006
(In thousands)
Current income tax expense
$
$
$
Deferred income tax expense
21,938
11,129
8,777
Total income tax expense
$
21,938
$
11,129
$
8,777
The following table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate
for 2008, 2007 and 2006
2008
2007
2006
Income taxes at statutory rate
29.00
%
32.12
%
34.12
%
Enacted future federal rate reductions
(3.96
%)
(7.08
%)
(5.12
%)
Enacted
future rate reductions effects for prior years
(9.35
%)
(6.62
%)
Permanent differences
1.44
%
0.77
%
(4.48
%)
Other
(0.12
%)
Effective income tax rate
26.36
%
16.46
%
17.90
%
11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
QRCI pays Quicksilver for allocations of general and administrative expenses and salary,
travel costs and other invoices paid by Quicksilver on the Companys behalf. During 2008, 2007 and
2006, QRCI paid Quicksilver $3.7 million, $2.5 million and $1.8 million for its portion of general
and administrative expenses allocated by Quicksilver. Amounts required for settlement of QRCIs
financial derivatives are paid or received and subsequently settled between Quicksilver and the
Company. During 2008, QRCI paid Quicksilver $0.2 million for settlement of derivatives. For 2007
and 2006, Quicksilver paid QRCI $25.6 million and $9.7 million for these settlements. In 2007,
QRCI received $11.5 million for the sales of natural gas to Quicksilver. All related party
transactions occur in the normal course of business.
12. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
QRCI has a retirement plan available to all Canadian employees. The plan provides for a match
of employees contributions by the Company and a fixed annual contribution. Expenses associated
with QRCI contributions were $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.5 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
QRCI leases office space and other property under operating leases. Future minimum lease
payments, for operating leases with initial non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2008, were as follows:
in thousands
2009
$
1,246
2010
369
2011
41
Thereafter
$
1,656
Rent
expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was
$1.8 million in 2008, $1.5 million in 2007 and
$0.9 million in 2006.
QRCI
had approximately $2.6 million in letters of credit to fulfill
contractual, legal or regulatory requirements. All letters of credit
have annual renewable options.
QRCI is involved in various claims arising in the normal course of business. While the
outcome of these matters is uncertain there can be no assurance that such matter will be resolved in
the Companys favor. QRCI does not currently believe that a
material adverse
outcome is likely related to these matters.
16
14. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Shares
Book
Issued
Value
(In thousands)
Unlimited number of Class A common voting shares
$
Unlimited number of Class B common voting shares
2,495,646
1,785
Unlimited number of Class C common non-voting, exchangeable shares
394,482
32
Balance at December 31, 2008 and 2007
2,890,128
$
1,817
QRCI Class C common shares are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for Quicksilver common
shares. Class C common shares are entitled to preference over the Class B common shares upon
certain events of liquidation or distribution of the assets of the Company.
Paid
in capital in excess of par value at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is comprised of $2.1 million relating to the
acquisition of the remaining non-controlling interest in the Company (10.2%) by Quicksilver in
2000, and cash of $26.0 million contributed by Quicksilver.
15. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest and income taxes is as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
(In thousands)
Interest
$
14,374
$
15,547
$
13,004
Income taxes
Other significant non-cash transactions are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
(In thousands)
Working capital related to acquisition
of property, plant and equipment
16,450
$
19,653
$
39,189
Preferred interests in 1373159 Alberta Ltd.
82,542
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
Under the full cost method in accounting for oil and gas properties, QRCI must perform a
quarterly ceiling test for its country-wide cost center. In determining the ceiling limitation, the
ceiling test incorporates pricing, costs and discount rates over which management has no influence.
The 2009 first quarter Canadian ceiling
amount was computed using a natural gas benchmark price of $2.92 per
MMBtu and the mandated 10% discount rate. Upon calculation of
the present value of QRCIs natural gas reserves, including its
hedge derivatives, the carrying value of its oil and gas properties
exceeded the ceiling limit by $109.6 million (pre-tax) which was recorded in the first quarter of
2009.
17
COWTOWN PIPELINE FUNDING, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To the Stockholders of
Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc.
Fort Worth, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income, cash flows and changes in stockholders equity for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared from
the separate records maintained by Quicksilver Resources Inc. and may not necessarily be indicative of the conditions that would have existed
or the results of operations if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated entity. Portions of certain expenses represent
allocations made from, and are applicable to, Quicksilver Resources Inc. as a whole.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
May 29, 2009
19
COWTOWN PIPELINE FUNDING, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME In thousands
Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Revenues
Gathering and transportation revenue Quicksilver
$
36,061
$
15,089
$
6,460
Gathering and transportation revenue
6,118
1,773
53
Gas processing revenue Quicksilver
30,127
16,564
7,342
Gas processing revenue
5,366
1,990
63
Other revenue Quicksilver
900
525
Total revenues
78,572
35,941
13,918
Expenses
Operations and maintenance Quicksilver
21,638
12,037
7,567
General and administrative Quicksilver
6,407
3,379
1,278
Depreciation and accretion
15,134
8,146
2,999
Total expenses
43,179
23,562
11,844
Impairment Expense
9,200
Operating income
26,193
12,379
2,074
Other income
11
236
12
Interest expense
4,154
2,022
Income before income taxes
22,050
10,593
2,086
Income tax provision
7,861
3,591
730
Minority interest
4,716
1,092
99
Net income
$
9,473
$
5,910
$
1,257
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
20
COWTOWN PIPELINE FUNDING, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In thousands
December 31,
December 31,
2008
2007
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
303
$
1,125
Accounts receivable
2,245
882
Accounts receivable from Quicksilver
3,494
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
594
690
Total current assets
3,142
6,191
Properties, plant and equipment, net
489,893
284,885
Deferred tax asset
1,303
6,625
Other assets
1,916
965
$
496,254
$
298,666
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current maturities of debt
$
1,375
$
1,100
Accounts payable to Quicksilver
12,173
9,079
Accrued additions to property, plant and equipment
17,433
23,624
Accounts payable and other
1,930
2,425
Current tax payable
10,844
10,844
Total current liabilities
43,755
47,072
Long-term debt
174,900
5,000
Note payable to Quicksilver
52,271
50,569
Asset retirement obligations
5,234
2,793
Deferred gain on sale of subsidiary equity
79,316
79,316
Minority interest
31,287
31,487
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 7)
Common stock
1
1
Additional paid in capital
91,834
74,245
Retained earnings
17,656
8,183
Total equity
109,491
82,429
$
496,254
$
298,666
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
21
COWTOWN PIPELINE FUNDING, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS In thousands
Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Operating activities:
Net income
$
9,473
$
5,910
$
1,257
Items included in net income not affecting cash:
Depreciation
14,950
8,063
2,978
Impairment of midstream assets
9,200
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
184
83
21
Deferred income taxes
7,861
3,591
730
Equity-based compensation
1,017
130
Amortization of debt issuance costs
243
88
Non-cash interest expense
2,802
1,669
Minority interest expense
4,716
1,092
99
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
(1,363
)
(815
)
(66
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(612
)
(543
)
(146
)
Accounts receivable from Quicksilver
4,707
(6,046
)
Accounts payable and other
(495
)
1,131
1,138
Net cash provided by operating activities
52,683
14,353
6,011
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(148,079
)
(74,064
)
(77,539
)
Other
(821
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(148,079
)
(74,064
)
(78,360
)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from revolving credit facility borrowings
169,900
5,000
Debt issuance costs
(486
)
(1,041
)
Repayment of subordinated note payable to Quicksilver
(829
)
Net proceeds from issuance of equity units
112,298
Issuance costs of equity units paid
(2,933
)
Distribution to Quicksilver
(65,367
)
(115,074
)
Contributions by Quicksilver
68,416
67,855
Contributions by minority interests
167
7,291
Distributions to minority interests
(8,644
)
(8,794
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
94,574
58,039
75,146
Net increase (decrease) in cash
(822
)
(1,672
)
2,797
Cash at beginning of period
1,125
2,797
Cash at end of period
$
303
$
1,125
$
2,797
Cash paid for interest
$
2,341
Cash paid for income taxes
$
332
Non-cash transactions:
Working capital related to capital expenditures
$
31,920
$
30,809
$
6,608
Debt issuance costs
(12
)
Cost in connection with the initial public offering
(275
)
Issuance of subordinated note payable to Quicksilver
50,000
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
22
COWTOWN PIPELINE FUNDING, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY In thousands
Additional
Common
Retained
Paid In
Stock
Earnings
Capital
Total Equity
Balance at January 1, 2006
$
1
$
1,016
$
48,595
$
49,612
Contributions
71,685
71,685
Cash distributions to Quicksilver
(4,508
)
(4,508
)
Net income
1,257
1,257
Balance at December 31, 2006
1
2,273
115,772
118,046
Contributions
121,157
121,157
Reclass Quicksilvers equity balance to receivable from
Quicksilver
1,971
1,971
Distribution of subordinated note payable to Quicksilver
(50,000
)
(50,000
)
Cash distributions to Quicksilver
(114,655
)
(114,655
)
Net income
5,910
5,910
Balance at December 31, 2007
1
8,183
74,245
82,429
Contributions
82,956
82,956
Cash distributions to Quicksilver
(65,367
)
(65,367
)
Net income
9,473
9,473
Balance at December 31, 2008
$
1
$
17,656
$
91,834
$
109,491
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
23
COWTOWN PIPELINE FUNDING, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Description of Business Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc. (CPFI) is a Delaware corporation
that holds approximately 73% ownership of Quicksilver Resources Incs (Quicksilver) interest in
Quicksilver Gas Services, LP (KGS).
CPFI also owns 99% of both Cowtown Pipeline L.P. (CPLP) and Cowtown Gas Processing L.P.
(CGPLP), consolidating both entities. CPLP and CGPLP, in addition to owning the majority of
KGS, are engaged in performing gathering and processing services for unaffiliated companies in
the Delaware Basin in West Texas. Operations in West Texas accounted for less than 1% of CPFI
consolidated revenues for all periods presented and are also immaterial to CPFIs assets and
cash flows. CPFI has no discrete operations but controls KGS and therefore the financials are
consolidated and recognizes a minority interest.
KGS is engaged in gathering and processing natural gas and NGLs, produced from the Barnett
Shale formation in the Fort Worth Basin located in North Texas. KGS provides services under
contracts, whereby it receives fees for performing the gathering and processing services. KGS does
not take title to the natural gas or associated NGLs that it gathers and processes therefore avoids
direct commodity price exposure.
KGS assets include:
The Cowtown System, which includes:
the Cowtown Pipeline, which consists of a pipeline gathering system and gas
compression facilities in the southern portion of the Fort Worth Basin and gathers
natural gas produced by KGS customers and delivers it for processing;
the Cowtown Plant, in Hood County, Texas, which consists of two natural gas
processing units that extract NGLs from the natural gas stream and deliver customers
residue gas to unaffiliated pipelines for transport and sale downstream; and
the Corvette Plant in Hood County, Texas, which was placed in service during
the first quarter 2009, and consists of a natural gas processing unit that extracts
NGLs from the natural gas stream and delivers KGS customers residue gas to
unaffiliated pipelines for transport and sale downstream.
The Lake Arlington Dry System, located in Tarrant County, Texas, which consists of a
gathering system and a gas compression facility, which KGS purchased from Quicksilver in
the fourth quarter of 2008. This system is connected to affiliated pipelines for transport
and sale downstream.
The West Texas System, which consists of a 12 mile gathering system and a dehydration
facility with capacity up to 6MMcfd.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes
of CPFI present the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in equity of
CPFI. CPFI eliminates all inter-company balances and transactions in preparing consolidated
financial statements.
Use of Estimates The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP in the
United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
that exist at the date of the financial statements. Estimates and judgments are based on
information available at the time such estimates and judgments are made. Although management
believes the estimates are appropriate, actual results can differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents CPFI considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining
maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash or cash equivalents. These
cash equivalents consist principally of temporary investments of cash in short-term money market
instruments.
24
Accounts receivable Accounts receivable are due from Quicksilver and other independent
natural gas producers. Each customer of CPFI is reviewed as to credit worthiness prior to the
extension of credit and on a regular basis thereafter. Although CPFI does not require collateral,
appropriate credit ratings are required. Receivables are generally due within 60 days. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, CPFI recorded no allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable.
During 2008, CPFI experienced no non-payment for its services.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets.
The cost of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant improvements, are expensed when
incurred. Expenditures to extend the useful lives of the assets or enhance their productivity or
efficiency from their original design are capitalized over the expected remaining period of use.
Asset Retirement Obligations CPFI records the discounted fair value of the liability for
asset retirement obligations in the period in which it is legally or contractually incurred. Upon
initial recognition of the asset retirement liability, an asset retirement cost is capitalized by
increasing the carrying amount of the long-lived asset by the same amount as the liability. In
periods subsequent to the initial measurement, the asset retirement cost is allocated to expense
using a straight line method over the assets useful life. Changes in the liability for the asset
retirement obligation are recognized for (a) the passage of time and (b) revisions to either the
timing or the amount of the estimated cash flows.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets CPFI reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If
it is determined that an assets estimated future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover its
carrying amount, an impairment charge will be recorded to reduce the carrying amount for the asset
to its estimated fair value if such carrying amount exceeds the fair value. At December 31, 2008,
CPFIs analysis of its estimated future cash flows resulted in CPFI recording an impairment of $9.2
million for the midstream assets in West Texas.
Other Assets Other assets as of December 31, 2008 consist of costs associated with debt
issuance and pipeline license agreements net of amortization. Other assets at December 31, 2007
consisted of cost associated with debt issuance net of amortization. Debt issuance costs are
amortized over the term of the associated debt. Pipeline license agreements provide CPFI the right
to construct, operate and maintain certain pipelines with local municipalities. The pipeline
license agreements are amortized over the term of the agreement.
Environmental Liabilities Liabilities for environmental loss contingencies, including
environmental remediation costs, are charged to expense when it is probable that a liability has
been incurred and the amount of the assessment or remediation can be reasonably estimated.
Revenue Recognition CPFIs primary service offerings are the gathering and processing of
natural gas. CPFIs subsidiaries have contracts under which they receive revenues based on the
volume of natural gas gathered and processed. CPFI recognizes revenue when all of the following
criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an exchange arrangement exists;
services have been rendered;
the price for its services is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is reasonably assured.
Income Taxes CPFI is subject to federal income taxes and recognizes the impact of tax on
temporary differences between the book and the tax basics of assets and liabilities. In addition,
deferred tax balances must be adjusted to reflect tax rates that we expect will be in effect during
years in which we expect the temporary differences will reverse. Net operating loss carry forwards
and other deferred tax assets are reviewed annually for recoverability, and if necessary, are
recorded net of a valuation allowance.
Segment Information CPFI operates solely in the midstream segment in Texas where it provides
natural gas gathering, transportation and processing services.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The fair value of accounts receivable, accounts payable,
long-term debt and the note payable to Quicksilver approximate their carrying amounts.
Equity Based Compensation At time of issuance of phantom units, the Board of Directors of
KGS determines whether they will be settled in cash or settled in KGS units. For awards payable in
cash, CPFI amortizes the expense associated with the award over the vesting period. The liability
for fair value is reassessed at every balance sheet date,
25
such that the vested portion of the liability is adjusted to reflect revised fair value
through compensation expense. Phantom unit awards payable in units are valued at the closing
market price of KGS common units on the date of grant. The unearned compensation is amortized to
compensation expense over the vesting period of the phantom unit award.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Pronouncements Implemented
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. No new requirements are included in
SFAS No. 157, but application of the Statement has changed current practice. CPFI adopted SFAS No.
157 on January 1, 2008 with no impact.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value that were not previously required to be measured at fair value. While SFAS No. 159 became
effective on January 1, 2008, CPFI did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of its
financial assets or liabilities.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting
the principles used in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the
United States. This Statement is generally viewed as a necessary step in the ultimate convergence
of global accounting rules. This Statement became effective on November 15, 2008 and was adopted
by CPFI with no significant impact on our financial statements or related disclosures.
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
SFAS No. 141(R) (revised 2007), Business Combinations, was issued in December 2007. SFAS No.
141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, while retaining its fundamental requirements
that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer
to be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity
that obtains control in the business combination and it establishes the criteria to determine the
acquisition date. The Statement also requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. In addition,
acquisition costs are required to be recognized as period expenses as incurred. The Statement will
apply to any acquisition completed by CPFI after January 1, 2009, but otherwise had no effect on
our financial statements upon adoption.
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 was issued in December 2007. The Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as
minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that
should be reported as a component of its equity. The Statement also changes the way the
consolidated income statement is presented by requiring consolidated net income to be reported at
amounts that include the amounts attributable to both Quicksilver and noncontrolling interest.
Additionally, SFAS No. 160 establishes a single method for accounting for changes in Quicksilvers
ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation. CPFI adopted SFAS No.
160 on January 1, 2009 which resulted in the reclassification of the minority interest liability of
$31.3 million to stockholders equity. Also, the adoption resulted in the reclassification of the
$79.3 million deferred gain related to the KGS IPO to paid in capital in excess of par value
within stockholders equity.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP
APB 14-1), which indicates that issuers of convertible debt instruments generally should
separately account for the liability component at its fair value and may result in amounts
previously reported as debt being reclassified to equity. Furthermore, interest expense in periods
subsequent to issuance may increase if the amount of reported debt changes. We adopted FSP APB
14-1 on January 1, 2009 with no impact to 2009 or previously reported results.
26
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
December 31,
Depreciable Life
2008
2007
(in thousands)
Gathering and transportation systems
20 years
$
187,832
$
114,618
Processing plants
20-25 years
160,404
120,477
Construction in progress plant
106,563
12,636
Construction in progress pipeline
27,994
20,046
Rights-of-way and easements
20 years
39,834
26,905
Land
1,239
952
Buildings and other
20-40 years
1,836
910
525,702
296,544
Accumulated Depreciation
(35,809
)
(11,659
)
Net property, plant and equipment
$
489,893
$
284,885
Construction in progress plant reflects the construction of the Corvette Plant, a processing
plant and compression facility attached to the Cowtown Pipeline, which was placed in service during
the first quarter of 2009.
4. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER
Accounts payable and other consists of the following:
December 31,
2008
2007
(in thousands)
Accrued operating expenses
$
957
$
882
Accrued property taxes
895
Equity compensation payable
116
275
Interest payable
734
147
Other
123
226
$
1,930
$
2,425
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
The following table summarizes our long-term debt payments due by period:
Payments Due by Period
Long-Term Debt
Total
2009
2010-2012
2013-2014
Thereafter
(in millions)
Credit Agreement
$
174.9
$
$
174.9
$
$
Subordinated Note to Quicksilver
53.6
1.4
3.3
48.9
Total long-term debt
$
228.5
$
1.4
$
178.2
$
48.9
$
Credit Agreement On August 10, 2007, KGS entered into a five-year $150 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement featured an accordion
option that with lenders approval increases the facility up to $250 million. On October 10, 2008,
the lenders approved an increase of the facility to $235 million. Also, the revised Credit
Agreement permits the future expansion of the facility to $350 million, with lender approval. The
facility, which matures August 10, 2012, can be extended up to two additional years with requisite
lender consent.
The Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit loans, swingline loans and letters of
credit. Borrowings under the facility are guaranteed by KGS subsidiaries and are secured by
substantially all of the assets of KGS and its subsidiaries. KGS has both LIBOR and U.S. prime
rate options for revolving loans and a specified rate for swingline loans.
27
The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants which can limit KGS borrowing capacity. All
of the covenants exclude the subordinated note payable to Quicksilver and KGS obligations to
Quicksilver and related non-cash interest. These financial covenants are summarized below:
Quarters Ended
Maximum Debt to EBITDA
Minimum EBITDA to Interest
December 31, 2008 and thereafter
4.50 to 1
2.50 to 1
At December 31, 2008, the lenders commitments under our credit agreement were $235 million
and may be further increased to as much as $350 million. Based on our results through December 31,
2008, our total borrowing capacity is $235 million and our borrowings were $174.9 million, and the
weighted average interest rate was 2.9%. The Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants that
prohibit the declaration or payment of distributions by KGS if a default then exists or would
result therefrom, and otherwise limits the amount of distributions that KGS can make. In the event
of default, the Credit Agreement allows for the acceleration of the loans, the termination of the
credit agreement and foreclosure on collateral.
Subordinated Note On August 10, 2007, KGS executed a subordinated promissory note (the
Subordinated Note) payable to Quicksilver in the principal amount of $50.0 million.
The Subordinated Note accrues interest based upon the rate applicable to borrowings under the
Credit Agreement plus 1%, which is locked at the time of borrowing. The interest rate at December
31, 2008 was 4.485%. Accrued and unpaid interest is payable quarterly on the last business day of
each calendar quarter, beginning on March 31, 2008, and on the Subordinated Notes maturity date
described below. Quarterly interest may be paid in cash or by adding it to the outstanding
principal balance of the Subordinated Note. Subject to certain restrictions, quarterly
installments of $275,000 are payable on the last business day of each calendar quarter. The final
payment is due on February 10, 2013. However, if the maturity date of the Credit Agreement is
extended, the maturity date of the Subordinated Note will also be automatically extended to the
date that is six months after the revised Credit Agreement maturity date. Amounts payable under
the Subordinated Note may at all times, at Quicksilvers election, be paid, in whole or in part,
using KGS units. The Subordinated Note contains events of default that permit, among other things,
the acceleration of the debt (unless otherwise prohibited pursuant to the subordination provisions
described below). Such events of default include, but are not limited to, payment defaults under
the Subordinated Note, the breach of certain covenants after applicable grace periods and the
occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreement.
Amounts due under the Subordinated Note are subordinated in right of payment to all of our
obligations under the Credit Agreement. KGS is precluded from making any payments under the
Subordinated Note if any of the following events exist or would result as of the date of the
proposed Subordinated Note payment:
an event of default under the revolving credit agreement;
the existence of a pending judicial proceeding with respect to any event of default under
the revolving credit agreement; or
our ratio of total indebtedness (which includes the $50.0 million Subordinated Note) to
EBITDA as of the end of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of such payment
was equal to or greater than 3.5 or would be greater than 3.5 after consideration of such
payment.
Through December 31, 2008, we have made all scheduled quarterly interest payments at the end
of each quarter by adding them to the principal of the Subordinated Note in accordance with its
terms. Accordingly, interest expense of $2.8 million recognized during 2008 was added to the
Subordinated Note. In 2008, we made three quarterly principal payments of the Subordinated Note
for a total of $0.8 million. The fourth quarter principal payment was prevented by the
indebtedness limitation on EBITDA described above.
28
6. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the asset retirement
obligation:
Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
(in thousands)
Beginning asset retirement obligations
$
2,793
$
503
Additional liability incurred
2,257
2,207
Accretion expense
184
83
Ending asset retirement obligations
$
5,234
$
2,793
As of December 31, 2008, no assets are legally restricted for use in settling asset retirement
obligations.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Litigation In February 2009, McGuffy Energy Services, L.P. (McGuffy) filed a lawsuit
against KGS and subsequently added Quicksilver as a party. McGuffy alleges, among other things,
claims for breach of contract, fraud and negligent misrepresentation arising from a written
agreement by which McGuffy was retained to provide certain engineering and construction services
for KGS Corvette Plant. McGuffy further seeks to foreclose on a $3.2 million lien that it filed
on the Corvette Plant. KGS disputes the amounts claimed by McGuffy and asserts a number of
defenses to McGuffys claims, including that payments to McGuffy must be withheld as demanded by
McGuffys unpaid subcontractors. In March 2009, KGS filed a lawsuit against McGuffy seeking
damages and declaratory relief for the disputes between KGS and McGuffy. The McGuffy
subcontractors that made demands on KGS were also named as parties. Several of the subcontractor
defendants have filed counterclaims against KGS seeking to foreclose on their purported liens.
Through March 31, 2009 KGS had recognized $2.0 million of the disputed amounts as a part of the
Corvette Plant construction costs. KGS intends to vigorously defend this matter and does not
expect its outcome to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operation.
Casualties or Other Risks Quicksilver maintains coverage in various insurance programs on
CPFIs behalf, which provides it with property damage, business interruption and other coverages
which are customary for the nature and scope of its operations.
Management of the general partner believes that Quicksilver and CPFI has adequate insurance
coverage, although insurance will not cover every type of loss that might occur. As a result of
insurance market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies have increased
substantially and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable, or available for
only reduced amounts of coverage. As a result, Quicksilver may not be able to renew existing
insurance policies or procure other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at
all. KGS maintains its own general partners liability insurance policy separate from the directors and officers policy
maintained by Quicksilver.
If CPFI or its subsidiaries were to incur a significant loss for which they were was not fully
insured, the loss could have a material impact on the consolidated financial position and results
of operations. In addition, the proceeds of any available insurance may not be paid in a timely
manner and may be insufficient if such an event were to occur. Any event that interrupts the
revenues generated by CPFI, or which causes CPFI to make significant expenditures not covered by
insurance, could reduce its ability to meet its financial obligations.
Regulatory Compliance In the ordinary course of business, CPFI and it subsidiaries are
subject to various laws and regulations. In the opinion of CPFIs management, compliance with
current laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on CPFIs financial position
or results of operations.
Environmental Compliance The operation of CPFI pipelines, plants and other facilities is
subject to stringent and complex laws and regulations pertaining to health, safety, and the
environment. As an owner or operator of these facilities, CPFI must comply with laws and
regulations at the federal, state and local levels that relate to air and water quality, hazardous
and solid waste management and disposal, and other environmental matters. The cost of planning,
designing, constructing and operating CPFI facilities must incorporate compliance with
environmental laws and regulations and safety standards. Failure to comply with these laws and
regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and potentially criminal enforcement
measures. At December 31, 2008, CPFI had no liabilities recorded for environmental matters.
29
Commitments CPFI, through its subsidiaries, has entered into agreements with third parties
providing for natural gas compression equipment and the construction of the Corvette plant, which
was placed in service during the first quarter of 2009.
The following table summarizes CPFI contractual obligations:
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations
Total
2009
2010-2012
2013-2014
Thereafter
(in millions)
Construction commitments
$
13.8
$
13.8
$
$
$
Total contractual obligations
$
13.8
$
13.8
$
$
$
8. INCOME TAXES
CPFI recognized income tax at the federal statutory income tax rate of 35%. CPFI is also
subject to the Texas margin tax rate of 1% beginning in 2007. As the tax base for computing Texas
margin tax is derived from an income-based measure, the Company recognizes this tax as an income
tax. Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December
31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
As of December 31,
2008
2007
(In thousands)
Non-current
Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax benefit on minority interest
$
3,185
$
646
Deferred tax benefit (liability) on partnership income
(1,882
)
5,979
Total deferred tax assets
$
1,303
$
6,625
The components of income tax expense for 2008, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
2008
2007
2006
(In thousands)
Current state income tax expense
$
$
371
$
Current U.S. federal income tax expense
10,273
Total current income tax expense
10,644
Deferred state income tax expense (benefit)
221
(265
)
Deferred U.S. federal income tax expense (benefit)
7,640
(6,788
)
730
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)
7,861
(7,053
)
730
Total income tax expense
$
7,861
$
3,591
$
730
The following table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate for 2008, 2007 and 2006:
2008
2007
2006
U.S. federal statutory tax rate
35.00
%
35.00
%
35.00
%
State income taxes net of federal deduction
0.65
%
(1.10
)%
0.00
%
Effective income tax rate
35.65
%
33.90
%
35.00
%
30
9. EQUITY PLAN
Awards of phantom units have been granted under KGS 2007 Equity Plan, which permits the
issuance of up to 750,000 units. The following table summarizes information regarding the phantom
unit activity:
Payable in cash
Payable in units
Weighted
Weighted
Average
Average
Grant Date
Grant Date
Units
Fair Value
Units
Fair Value
Unvested phantom units January 1, 2008
84,961
$
21.36
9,833
$
21.36
Vested
(28,247
)
21.43
(6,089
)
21.36
Issued
6,605
24.12
137,148
25.25
Cancelled
(3,000
)
21.36
(974
)
25.25
Unvested phantom units December 31, 2008
60,319
$
21.63
139,918
$
25.15
At January 1, 2008, total unvested compensation cost was $1.9 million related to unvested
phantom units. Compensation expense of approximately $1.4 million was recognized during 2008,
including $0.4 million for remeasuring the vested portion of awards to be settled in cash to their
revised fair value. Grants of phantom units during the year ended December 31, 2008 had an
estimated grant date fair value of $3.6 million. Unearned compensation expense of $2.3 million at
December 31, 2008 will be recognized in expense over the next 1.9 years. Phantom units that vested
during the year ended December 31, 2008 had a fair value of $0.7 million on their vesting date.
10. MINORITY INTEREST AND DEFERRED GAIN ON SALE
Minority Interest - As a result of the KGS IPO, the outside ownership of KGS increased and
therefore consolidated KGS financial position and results of operations and recognized a minority
interest liability for that portion of KGS that is owned by entities not affiliated with
Quicksilver.
Deferred Gain on sale of subsidiary equity - As a result of the KGS IPO, a deferred gain of
approximately $79 million was recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The proceeds
received from the IPO exceeded CPFIs carrying value, which resulted in the gain. The absence of
parity between the common and subordinated units prevents the culmination of the earnings process.
CPFI deferred the gain until such time that the common units have equal standing to the units held
by the public. The gain will be recognized when the subordination period ends and the equality of
the shares are achieved.
11. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Upon completion of, or in connection with, its IPO, KGS entered into a number of agreements
with related parties. A description of those agreements follows:
Omnibus Agreement On August 10, 2007, KGS entered into an omnibus agreement (the Omnibus
Agreement) with Quicksilver, which addresses, among other matters:
restrictions on Quicksilvers ability to engage in midstream business activities in
Quicksilver Counties;
Obligation to reimburse Quicksilver for all general and administrative expenses incurred
by them on behalf of KGS; and
Quicksilvers obligation to provide cross-indemnification for certain liabilities.
Secondment Agreement On August 10, 2007, Quicksilver and KGS general partner entered into a
services and secondment agreement (the Secondment Agreement) pursuant to which specified
employees of Quicksilver have been seconded to KGS general partner to provide operating, routine
maintenance and other services with respect to the assets owned or operated by KGS. Under the
Secondment Agreement, the general partner reimburses Quicksilver for the services provided by the
seconded employees. The initial term of the Secondment Agreement is 10 years, but will extend for
additional annual periods unless cancelled by either party with 180 days written notice.
31
Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement On August 10, 2007, Quicksilver, Cowtown Gas
Processing Partners LP (Processing Partners) and Cowtown Pipeline Partners LP (Pipeline
Partners) together with Processing Partners (the Cowtown Partnerships) entered into the Fifth
Amended and Restated Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement. In
connection with the IPO, Processing Partners and Pipeline Partners became indirect
wholly-owned subsidiaries of KGS. Under the Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement, Quicksilver
has agreed, for an initial term of 10 years, to dedicate and deliver for processing all of the
natural gas produced on properties operated by Quicksilver within the Quicksilver Counties. The
dedication does not oblige Quicksilver to develop the reserves subject to the Gas Gathering and
Processing Agreement.
Effective September 1, 2008, Quicksilver and KGS entered into the Sixth Amended and Restated
Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement, which amended the previous agreement by specifying that
Quicksilver has agreed to pay $0.4163 per MMBtu gathered and $0.5204 per MMBtu processed and a
compression fee of up to $0.30 per MMBtu on the Cowtown System. The compression fee payable by
Quicksilver at a gathering system delivery point shall never be less than KGS actual cost to
perform such compression service. Quicksilver may also pay KGS a treating fee based on carbon
dioxide content at the pipeline entry point. The rates above are each subject to an annual
inflationary escalation.
If KGS determines that the gathering or processing of Quicksilvers production becomes
uneconomical, KGS may cease gathering and processing Quicksilvers production as long as the
uneconomical conditions exist. If KGS is unable to provide either gathering or processing
services, Quicksilver may use other providers. If KGS is unable to provide either gathering or
processing services for a period of 60 consecutive days, for reasons other than force majeure,
causing Quicksilvers wells to be shut-in (in the case of gathering) or resulting in Quicksilvers
inability to by-pass the Cowtown Plant and deliver its natural gas production to an alternative
pipeline (in the case of processing), Quicksilver has the right to terminate the Gas Gathering and
Processing Agreement as it relates to the affected gas.
Absent written notice of termination, the Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement is
automatically renewed for one year periods. In addition, if the Gas Gathering and Processing
Agreement, or performance under this agreement, becomes subject to FERC jurisdiction, the agreement
would be terminated unless both parties agree to continue the agreement.
During the second quarter of 2008, KGS agreed to purchase land and a warehouse located in Hood
County, Texas, from Quicksilver for a purchase price of $0.3 million and the reimbursement to
Quicksilver of $0.6 million of costs. KGS also obtained additional easement rights for a total
cost of $0.2 million from an affiliate of an entity that beneficially owns a small portion of KGS
outstanding units.
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement On August 10, 2007 KGS entered into a
contribution, conveyance, and assumption agreement (Contribution Agreement) with its general
partner, certain other affiliates of Quicksilver and the private investors. The following
transactions, among others, occurred just prior to the KGS IPO pursuant to the Contribution
Agreement:
the transfer of all of the interests of certain entities to KGS and its subsidiaries;
the issuance of the incentive distribution rights to the general partner and the
continuation of its 2% general partner interest in KGS;
KGS issuance of 5,696,752 common units, 11,513,625 subordinated units and the right to
receive $162.1 million, to Holdings in exchange for the contributed interests; and
KGS issuance of 816,873 common units and the right to receive $7.7 million to private
investors in exchange for their contributed interests.
Centralized cash management As of December 31, 2008 revenues settled with Quicksilver and
other customers, net of expenses paid by Quicksilver on behalf of KGS, are reflected as a
receivable from or a payable to Quicksilver on the consolidated balance sheets and as a reduction
of net cash provided by or used by operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Services to affiliates KGS routinely conducts business with Quicksilver and its affiliates.
The related transactions result primarily from fee-based arrangements for gathering and processing
of natural gas. Fees were determined based on fees to third parties and reflect the cost of
providing such services. Quicksilver has engaged us to operate midstream assets owned by it for a
monthly fee of $75,000.
Allocation of costs The individuals supporting CPFIs operating subsidiaries are employees
of Quicksilver. CPFIs consolidated financial statements include costs allocated to KGS by
Quicksilver for centralized general and administrative services performed by Quicksilver, as well
as depreciation of assets utilized by Quicksilvers centralized general and administrative
functions. Costs allocated to KGS are based on identification of Quicksilvers resources which
directly benefit KGS and its estimated usage of shared resources and functions. All of the
allocations are based on assumptions that management believes are reasonable.
32
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES HOLDINGS LLC
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To the Members of
Quicksilver Gas Services Holdings LLC
Fort Worth, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Quicksilver Gas Services Holdings LLC and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in members capital for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Quicksilver
Gas Services Holdings LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the
separate records maintained by Quicksilver Resources Inc. and may not necessarily be indicative of the conditions that would have existed or
the results of operations if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated entity. Portions of certain expenses represent
allocations made from, and are applicable to, Quicksilver Resources Inc. as a whole.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
May 29, 2009
34
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES HOLDINGS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
In thousands
Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Revenues
Gathering and transportation revenue Quicksilver
$
36,061
$
15,089
$
6,460
Gathering and transportation revenue
5,612
1,773
53
Gas processing revenue Quicksilver
30,127
16,564
7,342
Gas processing revenue
5,358
1,990
63
Other revenue Quicksilver
900
525
Total revenues
78,058
35,941
13,918
Expenses
Operations and maintenance Quicksilver
20,250
11,512
7,475
General and administrative Quicksilver
6,407
3,379
937
Depreciation and accretion
14,566
8,070
2,963
Total expenses
41,223
22,961
11,375
Operating income
36,835
12,980
2,543
Other income
11
236
13
Interest expense
10,177
4,647
Income before income taxes
26,669
8,569
2,556
Income tax provision
253
313
135
Minority interest expense
7,160
1,304
140
Net income
$
19,256
$
6,952
$
2,281
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
35
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES HOLDINGS LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS In thousands
December 31,
December 31,
2008
2007
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
303
$
1,125
Accounts receivable
2,082
882
Accounts receivable from Quicksilver
800
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
594
690
Total current assets
2,979
3,497
Properties, plant and equipment, net
488,120
273,948
Other assets
1,916
965
$
493,015
$
278,410
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS CAPITAL
Current liabilities
Current maturities of debt
$
1,375
$
1,100
Accounts payable to Quicksilver
10,502
Accrued additions to property, plant and equipment
17,433
23,624
Accounts payable and other
1,930
2,700
Total current liabilities
31,240
27,424
Long-term debt
174,900
5,000
Note payable to Quicksilver
52,271
50,569
Repurchase obligations to Quicksilver
123,298
82,251
Asset retirement obligations
5,234
2,793
Deferred income tax liability
369
173
Deferred gain on sale of subsidiary equity
79,316
79,316
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 7)
Minority interest
29,867
30,338
Net members capital (deficit)
(3,480
)
546
$
493,015
$
278,410
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
36
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES HOLDINGS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS In thousands
Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Operating activities:
Net income
$
19,256
$
6,952
$
2,281
Items included in net income not affecting cash:
Depreciation
14,382
7,987
2,942
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
184
83
21
Deferred income taxes
196
38
135
Equity-based compensation
1,017
130
Amortization of debt issuance costs
243
88
Non-cash interest expense
8,825
4,294
Minority interest expense
7,160
1,304
140
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
(1,200
)
(815
)
(66
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(612
)
(543
)
(146
)
Accounts receivable from Quicksilver
4,002
(5,975
)
Accounts payable and other
(770
)
1,406
1,138
Net cash provided by operating activities
52,683
14,949
6,445
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(148,079
)
(73,797
)
(77,539
)
Other
(821
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(148,079
)
(73,797
)
(78,360
)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of assets to Quicksilver
29,508
Proceeds from revolving credit facility borrowings
169,900
5,000
Debt issuance costs
(486
)
(1,041
)
Repayment of repurchase obligation to Quicksilver
(42,085
)
Repayment of subordinated note payable to Quicksilver
(829
)
Net proceeds from sale of KGS units
112,298
Costs paid for sale of KGS units
(2,933
)
Distributions to Quicksilver
(23,282
)
(115,074
)
Contributions by Quicksilver
38,045
67,421
Contributions by minority interests
167
7,291
Distributions to minority interests
(8,644
)
(8,794
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
94,574
57,176
74,712
Net increase (decrease) in cash
(822
)
(1,672
)
2,797
Cash at beginning of period
1,125
2,797
Cash at end of period
$
303
$
1,125
$
2,797
Cash paid for interest
$
2,341
Cash paid for income taxes
$
332
Non-cash transactions:
Working capital related to capital expenditures
$
31,920
$
30,809
$
6,608
Debt issuance costs
(12
)
Cost in connection with the initial public offering
(275
)
Issuance of subordinated note payable to Quicksilver
50,000
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment under
repurchase
obligation
$
(77,108
)
$
(50,118
)
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
37
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES HOLDINGS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS CAPITAL In thousands
Net Members Capital
Balance at January 1, 2006
$
48,949
Contributions
71,930
Cash distributions to Quicksilver
(4,508
)
Net income
2,281
Balance at December 31, 2006
118,652
Contributions
38,045
Distribution of subordinated note payable to Quicksilver
(50,000
)
Reclass Quicksilvers equity balance to receivable from
Quicksilver
1,971
Cash distributions to Quicksilver
(115,074
)
Net income
6,952
Balance at December 31, 2007
546
Cash distributions to Quicksilver
(23,282
)
Net income
19,256
Balance at December 31, 2008
$
(3,480
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
38
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES HOLDINGS LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Organization Quicksilver Gas Services Holdings LLC (KGSH) is a Delaware limited liability
corporation formed in January 2007 for the purpose of maintaining approximately 73% ownership of
Quicksilver Resources Incs (Quicksilver) interest in Quicksilver Gas Services, LP (KGS). KGSH
is owned 50% by each of two entities which are each indirectly owned by Quicksilver.
KGSH has no discrete operations but controls KGS and therefore consolidates KGS financial
position and results of operations and recognizes a minority interest for that portion of KGS
that is owned by entities not affiliated with Quicksilver.
Description of Business KGS is engaged in gathering and processing natural gas and NGLs,
produced from the Barnett Shale formation in the Fort Worth Basin located in North Texas. KGS
provides services under contracts, whereby it receives fees for performing the gathering and
processing services. KGS does not take title to the natural gas or associated NGLs that it gathers
and processes therefore avoids direct commodity price exposure.
KGSHs assets consist solely of assets owned by KGS, whose assets include:
The Cowtown System, which includes:
the Cowtown Pipeline, which consists of a pipeline gathering system and gas
compression facilities in the southern portion of the Fort Worth Basin and gathers
natural gas produced by KGS customers and delivers it for processing;
the Cowtown Plant, in Hood County, Texas, which consists of two natural gas
processing units that extract NGLs from the natural gas stream and deliver customers
residue gas to unaffiliated pipelines for transport and sale downstream; and
the Corvette Plant in Hood County, Texas, which was placed in service during
the first quarter 2009, and consists of a natural gas processing unit that extracts
NGLs from the natural gas stream and delivers KGS customers residue gas to
unaffiliated pipelines for transport and sale downstream.
The Lake Arlington Dry System, located in Tarrant County, Texas, which consists of a
gathering system and a gas compression facility, which KGS purchased from Quicksilver in
the fourth quarter of 2008. This system is connected to affiliated pipelines for transport
and sale downstream.
As more fully described in Note 2, KGSH financial statements also include the operations of a
gathering system in Hill County, Texas (Hill County Dry System) that gathers production from the
Fort Worth Basin and delivers it to unaffiliated pipelines for transport and sale downstream.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes
of KGSH present the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in partners
capital of KGS natural gas gathering and processing assets. The financial statements include
historical cost-basis accounts of the assets of KGS Predecessor which were contributed to KGS
through KGSH by Quicksilver and two private investors in connection with the KGS IPO.
Use of Estimates The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP in the
United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
that exist at the date of the financial statements. Estimates and judgments are based on
information available at the time such estimates and judgments are made. Although management
believes the estimates are appropriate, actual results can differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents KGSH considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining
maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash or cash equivalents. These
cash equivalents consist principally of temporary investments of cash in short-term money market
instruments.
Accounts receivable Accounts receivable are due from Quicksilver and other independent
natural gas producers. Each customer of KGSH is reviewed as to credit worthiness prior to the
extension of credit and on a regular basis
39
thereafter. Although KGSH does not require collateral, appropriate credit ratings are
required. Receivables are generally due within 60 days. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, KGSH recorded no allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable. During 2008, KGSH experienced no
non-payment for their services.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets.
The cost of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant improvements, are expensed when
incurred. Expenditures to extend the useful lives of the assets or enhance their productivity or
efficiency from their original design are capitalized over the expected remaining period of use.
Asset Retirement Obligations KGSH records the discounted fair value of the liability for
asset retirement obligations in the period in which it is legally or contractually incurred. Upon
initial recognition of the asset retirement liability, an asset retirement cost is capitalized by
increasing the carrying amount of the long-lived asset by the same amount as the liability. In
periods subsequent to the initial measurement, the asset retirement cost is allocated to expense
using a straight line method over the assets useful life. Changes in the liability for the asset
retirement obligation are recognized for (a) the passage of time and (b) revisions to either the
timing or the amount of the estimated cash flows.
Repurchase Obligations to Quicksilver On June 5, 2007, KGSH sold several pipeline and
gathering assets to Quicksilver. These assets consist of:
a portion of the gathering lines in the Cowtown Pipeline;
the Lake Arlington Dry System; and
the Hill County Dry System.
At June 5, 2007, the assets were either constructed and in service or partially constructed.
The selling price for these assets was approximately $29.5 million, which represented KGS
Predecessors historical cost. KGS Predecessor collected the $29.5 million on August 9, 2007. All
assets conveyed are or were subject to repurchase by KGS from Quicksilver as follows:
Cowtown Pipeline repurchase KGS has the option to purchase portions of the Cowtown
Pipeline from Quicksilver at their original cost in or before 2011 based upon the expected timing
of their commerciality.
Lake Arlington Dry System repurchase KGS was obligated to purchase the Lake Arlington
Dry System from Quicksilver at its fair market value within two years after it was completed and
commercial service commenced. During the fourth quarter 2008, KGS completed the acquisition of
the Lake Arlington Dry System from Quicksilver for approximately $42 million. The purchase was
financed through the use of the credit agreement and resulted in the reduction of the repurchase
obligation. In conjunction with the purchase of the Lake Arlington Dry System, Quicksilver
assigned its gas gathering agreement to KGS. Under the terms of that agreement, Quicksilver
agreed to allow KGS to gather all of the natural gas produced by wells that it operated and from
future wells operated by it within the Lake Arlington area through August 2017. Quicksilvers
fee of $0.62 per Mcf gathered by KGS in the Lake Arlington Dry System is subject to annual
inflationary escalation.
Hill County Dry System repurchase KGS is obligated to purchase the Hill County Dry
System from Quicksilver at its fair market value in or before 2011 based upon the systems
expected timing of commerciality.
The following table summarizes the assets subject to KGS repurchase rights and obligations (in
millions):
Estimate of
Construction
Construction
Costs Recognized
Repurchase
Costs as of
through
obligation at
June 5, 2007
December 31,
December 31,
December
Sales Price
2008(1)
2008
31, 2008
KGS Repurchase
Cowtown Pipeline
$
22.9
$
62.6
$
67.0
$
67.0
Optional at Cost
Lake Arlington Dry
System
3.6
(2)
42.1
Repurchased at FV in 2008
Hill County Dry
System
3.0
78.0
56.3
56.3
Obligatory at FV
$
29.5
$
140.6
$
165.4
$
123.3
40
(1)
Estimates may change based on changes in producers drilling progress,
material and labor costs, easement costs and other factors
(2)
Excludes any estimated costs after completion of purchase
The assets conveyance was not treated as a sale for accounting purposes because KGS operates
them and intends to purchase them. Accordingly, the original cost and subsequently incurred costs
are recognized in both KGSHs consolidated property, plant and equipment and its consolidated
repurchase obligations to Quicksilver. Similarly, KGSHs consolidated results of operations
include the revenues and expenses for these operations. For 2008, KGSH recognized $6.0 million of
interest expense associated with the repurchase obligations to Quicksilver based on a
weighted-average interest rate of 5.2%.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets KGSH reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If
it is determined that an assets estimated future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover its
carrying amount, an impairment charge will be recorded to reduce the carrying amount for the asset
to its estimated fair value if such carrying amount exceeds the fair value. At December 31, 2008,
KGSH performed an analysis of its estimated future cash flows and determined that there was no
impairment on its long-lived assets.
Other Assets Other assets as of December 31, 2008 consist of costs associated with debt
issuance and pipeline license agreements net of amortization. Other assets at December 31, 2007
consisted of cost associated with debt issuance net of amortization. Debt issuance costs are
amortized over the term of the associated debt. Pipeline license agreements provide KGSH the right
to construct, operate and maintain certain pipelines with local municipalities. The pipeline
license agreements are amortized over the term of the agreement.
Environmental Liabilities Liabilities for environmental loss contingencies, including
environmental remediation costs, are charged to expense when it is probable that a liability has
been incurred and the amount of the assessment or remediation can be reasonably estimated.
Revenue Recognition KGSHs primary service offerings are the gathering and processing of
natural gas. KGSH has contracts under which it receives revenues based on the volume of natural
gas gathered and processed. KGSH recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an exchange arrangement exists;
services have been rendered;
the price for its services is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is reasonably assured.
Income Taxes KGSH is subject to a margin tax that requires tax payments at a maximum
effective rate of 0.7% of the gross revenue apportioned to Texas. The margin tax qualifies as an
income tax under GAAP, which requires KGSH to recognize currently the impact of this tax on the
temporary differences between the financial statement assets and liabilities and their tax basis.
Under the margin tax, taxable entities that are part of an affiliated group engaged in a unitary
business must file a combined group report. As a result, KGSH is included in a combined group
report with Quicksilver and are allocated their proportionate share of the tax liability.
Segment Information KGSH operates solely in the midstream segment in Texas where it provides
natural gas gathering, transportation and processing services.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The fair value of accounts receivable, accounts payable,
long-term debt, the note payable to Quicksilver and repurchase obligations to Quicksilver
approximate their carrying amounts.
Equity Based Compensation At time of issuance of phantom units, the Board of Directors of
KGS determines whether they will be settled in cash or settled in KGS units. For awards payable in
cash, KGSH amortizes the expense associated with the award over the vesting period. The liability
for fair value is reassessed at every balance sheet date, such that the vested portion of the
liability is adjusted to reflect revised fair value through compensation expense. Phantom unit
awards payable in units are valued at the closing market price of KGS common units on the date of
grant. The unearned compensation is amortized to compensation expense over the vesting period of
the phantom unit award.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Pronouncements Implemented
41
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. No new requirements are included in
SFAS No. 157, but application of the Statement has changed current practice. KGSH adopted SFAS No.
157 on January 1, 2008 with no impact.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value that were not previously required to be measured at fair value. While SFAS No. 159 became
effective on January 1, 2008, KGSH did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of its
financial assets or liabilities.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting
the principles used in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the
United States. This Statement is generally viewed as a necessary step in the ultimate convergence
of global accounting rules. This Statement became effective on November 15, 2008 and was adopted
by KGSH with no significant impact on our financial statements or related disclosures.
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
SFAS No. 141(R) (revised 2007), Business Combinations, was issued in December 2007. SFAS No.
141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, while retaining its fundamental requirements
that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer
to be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity
that obtains control in the business combination and it establishes the criteria to determine the
acquisition date. The Statement also requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. In addition,
acquisition costs are required to be recognized as period expenses as incurred. The Statement will
apply to any acquisition completed by KGSH after January 1, 2009, but otherwise had no effect on
our financial statements upon adoption.
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 was issued in December 2007. The Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as
minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that
should be reported as a component of its equity. The Statement also changes the way the
consolidated income statement is presented by requiring consolidated net income to be reported at
amounts that include the amounts attributable to both Quicksilver and noncontrolling interest.
Additionally, SFAS No. 160 establishes a single method for accounting for changes in Quicksilvers
ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation. KGSH adopted SFAS No.
160 on January 1, 2009 which resulted in the reclassification of the minority interest liability of
$29.9 million to stockholders equity. Also, the adoption resulted in the reclassification of the
$79.3 million deferred gain related to the KGS IPO to paid in capital in excess of par value
within stockholders equity.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP
APB 14-1), which indicates that issuers of convertible debt instruments generally should
separately account for the liability component at its fair value and may result in amounts
previously reported as debt being reclassified to equity. Furthermore, interest expense in periods
subsequent to issuance may increase if the amount of reported debt changes. We adopted FSP APB
14-1 on January 1, 2009 with no impact to 2009 or previously reported results.
42
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
December 31,
Depreciable Life
2008
2007
(in thousands)
Gathering and transportation systems
20 years
$
179,594
$
106,478
Processing plants
20-25 years
157,353
117,571
Construction in progress plant
106,563
12,636
Construction in progress pipeline
27,994
20,046
Rights-of-way and easements
20 years
39,473
26,905
Land
1,239
952
Buildings and other
20-40 years
1,836
910
514,052
285,498
Accumulated Depreciation
(25,932
)
(11,550
)
Net property, plant and equipment
$
488,120
$
273,948
Construction in progress plant reflects the construction of the Corvette Plant, a processing
plant and compression facility attached to the Cowtown Pipeline, which was placed in service during
the first quarter of 2009.
4. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER
Accounts payable and other consists of the following:
December 31,
2008
2007
(in thousands)
Accrued operating expenses
$
957
$
882
Accrued property taxes
895
State income taxes
276
Equity compensation payable
116
275
Interest payable
734
147
Other
123
225
$
1,930
$
2,700
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
The following table summarizes our long-term debt payments due by period:
Payments Due by Period
Long-Term Debt
Total
2009
2010-2012
2013-2014
Thereafter
(in millions)
Credit Agreement
$
174.9
$
$
174.9
$
$
Subordinated Note to Quicksilver
53.6
1.4
3.3
48.9
Total long-term debt
$
228.5
$
1.4
$
178.2
$
48.9
$
Credit Agreement On August 10, 2007, KGS entered into a five-year $150 million senior
secured revolving credit facility (Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement featured an accordion
option that with lenders approval increases the facility up to $250 million. On October 10, 2008,
the lenders approved an increase of the facility to $235 million. Also, the revised Credit
Agreement permits the future expansion of the facility to $350 million, with lender approval. The
facility, which matures August 10, 2012, can be extended up to two additional years with requisite
lender consent.
The Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit loans, swingline loans and letters of
credit. Borrowings under the facility are guaranteed by KGS subsidiaries and are secured by
substantially all of the assets of KGS and its subsidiaries. KGS has both LIBOR and U.S. prime
rate options for revolving loans and a specified rate for swingline loans.
43
The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants which can limit KGS borrowing capacity. All
of the covenants exclude the subordinated note payable to Quicksilver and KGS obligations to
Quicksilver and related non-cash interest. These financial covenants are summarized below:
Quarters Ended
Maximum Debt to EBITDA
Minimum EBITDA to Interest
December 31, 2008 and thereafter
4.50 to 1
2.50 to 1
At December 31, 2008, the lenders commitments under our credit agreement were $235 million
and may be further increased to as much as $350 million. Based on our results through December 31,
2008, our total borrowing capacity is $235 million and our borrowings were $174.9 million, and the
weighted average interest rate was 2.9%. The Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants that
prohibit the declaration or payment of distributions by KGS if a default then exists or would
result therefrom, and otherwise limits the amount of distributions that KGS can make. In the event
of default, the Credit Agreement allows for the acceleration of the loans, the termination of the
credit agreement and foreclosure on collateral.
Subordinated Note On August 10, 2007, KGS executed a subordinated promissory note (the
Subordinated Note) payable to Quicksilver in the principal amount of $50.0 million.
The Subordinated Note accrues interest based upon the rate applicable to borrowings under the
Credit Agreement plus 1%, which is locked at the time of borrowing. The interest rate at December
31, 2008 was 4.485%. Accrued and unpaid interest is payable quarterly on the last business day of
each calendar quarter, beginning on March 31, 2008, and on the Subordinated Notes maturity date
described below. Quarterly interest may be paid in cash or by adding it to the outstanding
principal balance of the Subordinated Note. Subject to certain restrictions, quarterly
installments of $275,000 are payable on the last business day of each calendar quarter. The final
payment is due on February 10, 2013. However, if the maturity date of the Credit Agreement is
extended, the maturity date of the Subordinated Note will also be automatically extended to the
date that is six months after the revised Credit Agreement maturity date. Amounts payable under
the Subordinated Note may at all times, at Quicksilvers election, be paid, in whole or in part,
using KGS units. The Subordinated Note contains events of default that permit, among other things,
the acceleration of the debt (unless otherwise prohibited pursuant to the subordination provisions
described below). Such events of default include, but are not limited to, payment defaults under
the Subordinated Note, the breach of certain covenants after applicable grace periods and the
occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreement.
Amounts due under the Subordinated Note are subordinated in right of payment to all of our
obligations under the Credit Agreement. KGS is precluded from making any payments under the
Subordinated Note if any of the following events exist or would result as of the date of the
proposed Subordinated Note payment:
an event of default under the revolving credit agreement;
the existence of a pending judicial proceeding with respect to any event of default under
the revolving credit agreement; or
our ratio of total indebtedness (which includes the $50.0 million Subordinated Note) to
EBITDA as of the end of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of such payment
was equal to or greater than 3.5 or would be greater than 3.5 after consideration of such
payment.
Through December 31, 2008, we have made all scheduled quarterly interest payments at the end
of each quarter by adding them to the principal of the Subordinated Note in accordance with its
terms. Accordingly, interest expense of $2.8 million recognized during 2008 was added to the
Subordinated Note. In 2008, we made three quarterly principal payments of the Subordinated Note
for a total of $0.8 million. The fourth quarter principal payment was prevented by the
indebtedness limitation on EBITDA described above.
6. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the asset retirement
obligation:
44
Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
(in thousands)
Beginning asset retirement obligations
$
2,793
$
503
Additional liability incurred
2,257
2,207
Accretion expense
184
83
Ending asset retirement obligations
$
5,234
$
2,793
As of December 31, 2008, no assets are legally restricted for use in settling asset retirement
obligations.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Litigation In February 2009, McGuffy Energy Services, L.P. (McGuffy) filed a lawsuit
against KGS and subsequently added Quicksilver as a party. McGuffy alleges, among other things,
claims for breach of contract, fraud and negligent misrepresentation arising from a written
agreement by which McGuffy was retained to provide certain engineering and construction services
for KGS Corvette Plant. McGuffy further seeks to foreclose on a $3.2 million lien that it filed
on the Corvette Plant. KGS disputes the amounts claimed by McGuffy and asserts a number of
defenses to McGuffys claims, including that payments to McGuffy must be withheld as demanded by
McGuffys unpaid subcontractors. In March 2009, KGS filed a lawsuit against McGuffy seeking
damages and declaratory relief for the disputes between KGS and McGuffy. The McGuffy
subcontractors that made demands on KGS were also named as parties. Several of the subcontractor
defendants have filed counterclaims against KGS seeking to foreclose on their purported liens.
Through March 31, 2009 KGS had recognized $2.0 million of the disputed amounts as a part of the
Corvette Plant construction costs. KGS intends to vigorously defend this matter and does not
expect its outcome to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operation.
Casualties or Other Risks Quicksilver maintains coverage in various insurance programs on
KGS and KGSHs behalf, which provides them with property damage, business interruption and other
coverages which are customary for the nature and scope of their operations.
Management of KGSH believes that there exists adequate insurance coverage, although insurance
will not cover every type of loss that might occur. As a result of insurance market conditions,
premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies have increased substantially and, in some
instances, certain insurance may become unavailable, or available for only reduced amounts of
coverage. As a result, Quicksilver or KGSH may not be able to renew existing insurance policies or
procure other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. KGS maintains its
own general partners liability insurance policy separate from the directors and officers policy maintained by Quicksilver.
If KGSH were to incur a significant loss for which they were not fully insured, the loss could
have a material impact on KGSHs consolidated financial position and results of operations. In
addition, the proceeds of any available insurance may not be paid in a timely manner and may be
insufficient if such an event were to occur. Any event that interrupts the revenues generated by
KGSH, or which causes KGSH to make significant expenditures not covered by insurance, could reduce
its ability to meet its financial obligations.
Regulatory Compliance In the ordinary course of business, KGSH is subject to various laws
and regulations. In the opinion of management of the general partner, compliance with current laws
and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on KGSH financial condition or results of
operations.
Environmental Compliance The operation of pipelines, plants and other facilities is subject
to stringent and complex laws and regulations pertaining to health, safety, and the environment.
As an owner or operator of these facilities, KGSH must comply with laws and regulations at the
federal, state and local levels that relate to air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste
management and disposal, and other environmental matters. The cost of planning, designing,
constructing and operating KGSHs facilities must incorporate compliance with environmental laws
and regulations and safety standards. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may
trigger a variety of administrative, civil and potentially criminal enforcement measures. At
December 31, 2008, KGSH had no liabilities recorded for environmental matters.
Commitments KGSH, through KGS, has entered into agreements with third parties providing for
natural gas compression equipment and the construction of the Corvette plant, which was placed in
service during the first quarter of 2009.
45
The following table summarizes KGSHs consolidated contractual obligations:
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations
Total
2009
2010-2012
2013-2014
Thereafter
(in millions)
Construction commitments
$
13.8
$
13.8
$
$
$
Total contractual obligations
$
13.8
$
13.8
$
$
$
8. INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes related to KGSHs results of operations is included in
the consolidated financial statements as such income is taxable only by KGSHs partners and their
owners.
Temporary differences relating to KGSH consolidated assets and liabilities will impact the
provision for the Texas margin tax and a deferred tax liability has been recorded in the amount of
$0.4 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. KGSH derives all
of its revenue from operations in Texas.
During the third quarter of 2008, KGSH paid $0.3 million related to its 2007 liability for
Texas margin tax. Quicksilver does not expect to owe consolidated Texas margin tax for 2008 and,
accordingly, KGSH does not expect to make a cash payment for its 2008 liability for Texas margin
tax, based upon Texas filing rules. All effects of the 2008 Texas margin tax calculation are
captured in deferred income taxes.
9. EQUITY PLAN
Awards of phantom units have been granted under KGS 2007 Equity Plan, which permits the
issuance of up to 750,000 units. The following table summarizes information regarding the phantom
unit activity:
Payable in cash
Payable in units
Weighted
Weighted
Average
Average
Grant Date
Grant Date
Units
Fair Value
Units
Fair Value
Unvested phantom units January 1, 2008
84,961
$
21.36
9,833
$
21.36
Vested
(28,247
)
21.43
(6,089
)
21.36
Issued
6,605
24.12
137,148
25.25
Cancelled
(3,000
)
21.36
(974
)
25.25
Unvested phantom units December 31, 2008
60,319
$
21.63
139,918
$
25.15
At January 1, 2008, total unvested compensation cost was $1.9 million related to unvested
phantom units. Compensation expense of approximately $1.4 million was recognized during 2008,
including $0.4 million for remeasuring the vested portion of awards to be settled in cash to their
revised fair value. Grants of phantom units during the year ended December 31, 2008 had an
estimated grant date fair value of $3.6 million. Unearned compensation expense of $2.3 million at
December 31, 2008 will be recognized in expense over the next 1.9 years. Phantom units that vested
during the year ended December 31, 2008 had a fair value of $0.7 million on their vesting date.
10. MINORITY INTEREST AND DEFERRED GAIN ON SALE
Minority Interest As a result of the KGS IPO, the outside ownership of KGS increased and
therefore consolidated KGS financial position and results of operations and recognized a minority
interest liability for that portion of KGS that is owned by entities not affiliated with
Quicksilver.
Deferred Gain on sale of subsidiary equity As a result of the KGS IPO, a deferred gain of
approximately $79 million was recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The proceeds
received from the IPO exceeded KGSHs carrying value, which resulted in the gain. The absence of
parity between the common and subordinated units prevents the culmination of the earnings process.
KGSH deferred the gain until such time that the common units have equal standing to the units held
by the public. The gain will be recognized when the subordination period ends and the equality of
the shares are achieved.
46
11. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Upon completion of, or in connection with, its IPO, KGS entered into a number of agreements
with related parties. A description of those agreements follows:
Omnibus Agreement On August 10, 2007, KGS entered into an omnibus agreement (the Omnibus
Agreement) with Quicksilver, which addresses, among other matters:
restrictions on Quicksilvers ability to engage in midstream business activities in
Quicksilver Counties;
Quicksilvers construction of the Lake Arlington Dry System and the Hill County Dry
System and the obligations to repurchase those assets from Quicksilver at their fair market
value;
Obligation to reimburse Quicksilver for all general and administrative expenses incurred
by them on behalf of KGS; and
Quicksilvers obligation to provide cross-indemnification for certain liabilities.
Secondment Agreement On August 10, 2007, Quicksilver and KGS general partner entered into a
services and secondment agreement (the Secondment Agreement) pursuant to which specified
employees of Quicksilver have been seconded to KGS general partner to provide operating, routine
maintenance and other services with respect to the assets owned or operated by KGS. Under the
Secondment Agreement, the general partner reimburses Quicksilver for the services provided by the
seconded employees. The initial term of the Secondment Agreement is 10 years, but will extend for
additional annual periods unless cancelled by either party with 180 days written notice.
Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement On August 10, 2007, Quicksilver, Cowtown Gas
Processing Partners LP (Processing Partners) and Cowtown Pipeline Partners LP (Pipeline
Partners) together with Processing Partners (the Cowtown Partnerships) entered into the Fifth
Amended and Restated Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement. In connection with the IPO,
Processing Partners and Pipeline Partners became indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of KGS. Under
the Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement, Quicksilver has agreed, for an initial term of 10
years, to dedicate and deliver for processing all of the natural gas produced on properties
operated by Quicksilver within the Quicksilver Counties. The dedication does not oblige
Quicksilver to develop the reserves subject to the Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement.
Effective September 1, 2008, Quicksilver and KGS entered into the Sixth Amended and Restated
Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement, which amended the previous agreement by specifying that
Quicksilver has agreed to pay $0.4163 per MMBtu gathered and $0.5204 per MMBtu processed and a
compression fee of up to $0.30 per MMBtu on the Cowtown System. The compression fee payable by
Quicksilver at a gathering system delivery point shall never be less than KGS actual cost to
perform such compression service. Quicksilver may also pay KGS a treating fee based on carbon
dioxide content at the pipeline entry point. The rates above are each subject to an annual
inflationary escalation.
If KGS determines that the gathering or processing of Quicksilvers production becomes
uneconomical, KGS may cease gathering and processing Quicksilvers production as long as the
uneconomical conditions exist. If KGS is unable to provide either gathering or processing
services, Quicksilver may use other providers. If KGS is unable to provide either gathering or
processing services for a period of 60 consecutive days, for reasons other than force majeure,
causing Quicksilvers wells to be shut-in (in the case of gathering) or resulting in Quicksilvers
inability to by-pass the Cowtown Plant and deliver its natural gas production to an alternative
pipeline (in the case of processing), Quicksilver has the right to terminate the Gas Gathering and
Processing Agreement as it relates to the affected gas.
Absent written notice of termination, the Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement is
automatically renewed for one year periods. In addition, if the Gas Gathering and Processing
Agreement, or performance under this agreement, becomes subject to FERC jurisdiction, the agreement
would be terminated unless both parties agree to continue the agreement.
During the second quarter of 2008, KGS agreed to purchase land and a warehouse located in Hood
County, Texas, from Quicksilver for a purchase price of $0.3 million and the reimbursement to
Quicksilver of $0.6 million of costs. KGS also obtained additional easement rights for a total
cost of $0.2 million from an affiliate of an entity that beneficially owns a small portion of KGS
outstanding units.
47
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement On August 10, 2007 KGS entered into a
contribution, conveyance, and assumption agreement (Contribution Agreement) with its general
partner, certain other affiliates of Quicksilver and the private investors. The following
transactions, among others, occurred just prior to the KGS IPO pursuant to the Contribution
Agreement:
the transfer of all of the interests of certain entities to KGS and its subsidiaries;
the issuance of the incentive distribution rights to the general partner and the
continuation of its 2% general partner interest in KGS;
KGS issuance of 5,696,752 common units, 11,513,625 subordinated units and the right to
receive $162.1 million, to Holdings in exchange for the contributed interests; and
KGS issuance of 816,873 common units and the right to receive $7.7 million to private
investors in exchange for their contributed interests.
Centralized cash management Prior to the IPO, revenues settled with Quicksilver and other
customers, net of expenses paid by Quicksilver on behalf of KGS Predecessor, are reflected as
equity activity on the consolidated balance sheets and as a reduction of net cash provided by
financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Subsequent to the KGS IPO,
revenues settled and expenses paid on behalf of KGS are settled in cash on a monthly basis
utilizing KGS bank accounts. As of December 31, 2008 revenues settled with Quicksilver and other
customers, net of expenses paid by Quicksilver on behalf of KGS, are reflected as a receivable from
or a payable to Quicksilver on the consolidated balance sheets and as a reduction of net cash
provided by or used by operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Services to affiliates KGS routinely conducts business with Quicksilver and its affiliates.
The related transactions result primarily from fee-based arrangements for gathering and processing
of natural gas. Fees were determined based on fees to third parties and reflect the cost of
providing such services. Quicksilver has engaged us to operate midstream assets owned by it for a
monthly fee of $75,000.
Allocation of costs The individuals supporting KGS operations are employees of Quicksilver.
The consolidated financial statements include costs allocated to KGS by Quicksilver for centralized
general and administrative services performed by Quicksilver, as well as depreciation of assets
utilized by Quicksilvers centralized general and administrative functions. Costs allocated to KGS
are based on identification of Quicksilvers resources which directly benefit KGS and its estimated
usage of shared resources and functions. All of the allocations are based on assumptions that
management believes are reasonable.
48
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors of BreitBurn GP, LLC
and Unitholders of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P.
In our opinion, the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statement of operations,
partners equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. and its subsidiaries
(the Partnership) at December 31, 2008, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of
these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 14 to the
financial statements, the Partnership changed the manner in which it accounts for recurring
fair value measurements of financial instruments in 2008.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 2, 2009
49
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2008
Thousands of dollars, except per unit amounts
Revenues and other income items:
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid sales
$
467,381
Gains on commodity derivative instruments,
net (note 14)
332,102
Other revenue, net (note 10)
2,920
Total revenues and other income items
802,403
Operating costs and expenses:
Operating costs
149,681
Depletion, depreciation and amortization (note 5)
179,933
General and administrative expenses
43,435
Total operating costs and expenses
373,049
Operating income
429,354
Interest and other financing costs, net
29,147
Loss on interest rate swaps (note 14)
20,035
Other income, net
(191
)
Income before taxes and minority interest
380,363
Income tax expense (note 6)
1,939
Minority
interest (note 19)
188
Net income
378,236
General Partners interest in net income (loss)
(2,019
)
Limited Partners interest in net income
$
380,255
Basic net income per unit (note 2)
$
6.42
Diluted net income per unit (note 2)
$
6.28
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
50
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2008
Thousands of dollars, except unit amounts
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash
$
2,546
Accounts receivable, net (note 2)
47,221
Derivative instruments (note 14)
76,224
Related party receivables (note 7)
5,084
Inventory (note 8)
1,250
Prepaid expenses
5,300
Intangibles (note 9)
2,771
Other current assets
170
Total current assets
140,566
Equity investments (note 10)
9,452
Property, plant and equipment
Oil and gas properties (note 4)
2,057,531
Non-oil and gas assets (note 4)
7,806
2,065,337
Accumulated depletion and depreciation (note 5)
(224,996
)
Net property, plant and equipment
1,840,341
Other long-term assets
Intangibles (note 9)
495
Derivative instruments (note 14)
219,003
Other long-term assets
6,977
Total assets
$
2,216,834
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$
28,302
Book overdraft
9,871
Derivative instruments (note 14)
10,192
Revenue distributions payable
16,162
Derivative settlements payable
50
Salaries and wages payable
6,249
Accrued liabilities
9,164
Total current liabilities
79,990
Long-term debt (note 11)
736,000
Deferred income taxes (note 6)
4,282
Asset retirement obligation (note 12)
30,086
Derivative instruments (note 14)
10,058
Other long-term liabilities
2,987
Total liabilities
863,403
Minority interest (note 19)
539
Partners equity (note 13)
Limited partners interest (a)
1,352,892
Total liabilities and partners equity
$
2,216,834
(a) Limited partner units outstanding
52,635,634
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
51
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Thousands of dollars
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
$
378,236
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flow
from operating activities:
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
179,933
Unit-based compensation expense
6,907
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments
(370,734
)
Distributions greater than income from
equity affiliates
1,198
Deferred income tax
1,207
Minority interest
188
Amortization of intangibles
3,131
Other
2,643
Changes in net assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and other assets
258
Inventory
4,454
Net change in related party receivables and payables
32,688
Accounts payable and other liabilities
(13,413
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
226,696
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures
(131,082
)
Property acquisitions
(9,957
)
Net cash used by investing activities
(141,039
)
Cash flows from financing activities
Purchase of common units
(336,216
)
Distributions (1)
(121,349
)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
803,002
Repayments of long-term debt
(437,402
)
Book overdraft
7,951
Long-term debt issuance costs
(5,026
)
Net cash used by financing activities
(89,040
)
Decrease in cash
(3,383
)
Cash beginning of period
5,929
Cash end of period
$
2,546
(1)
Includes distributions on equivalent units of $2.3 million
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
52
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Partners Equity For the Year
Ended December 31, 2008
Limited
General
Thousands of dollars
Partners
Partner
Total
Balance,
January 1, 2008
$
1,423,418
$
1,390
$
1,424,808
Redemption of common
units from predecessors (a)
(336,216
)
(336,216
)
Distributions
(118,580
)
(427
)
(119,007
)
Distributions paid on unissued units under incentive plans
(2,335
)
(7
)
(2,342
)
Unit-based compensation
7,383
7,383
Net income
(loss) (b)
380,255
(2,019
)
378,236
Contribution of general partner interest to the partnership
(1,063
)
1,063
Other
30
30
Balance, December 31, 2008
$
1,352,892
$
$
1,352,892
(a)
Reflects the purchase of 14.405 million Common Units from subsidiaries of Provident.
(b)
General partner interests were purchased as of June 17, 2008.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Organization and Operations
BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P.
The Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership formed on March 23, 2006. In October 2006,
we completed an initial public offering of 6,000,000 Common Units and completed the sale of an
additional 900,000 Common Units to cover over-allotments in the initial public offering at $18.50
per unit, or $17.205 per unit, after deducting the underwriting discount. On May 24, 2007, we sold
4,062,500 Common Units in a private placement at $32.00 per unit, resulting in proceeds of
approximately $130 million. The net proceeds of this private placement were used to acquire
certain interests in oil leases and related assets located in Florida from Calumet Florida L.L.C.
and to reduce indebtedness under our credit facility. On May 25, 2007, we sold 2,967,744 Common
Units in a private placement at $31.00 per unit, resulting in proceeds of approximately $92
million. The net proceeds of this private placement were used to acquire a 99 percent limited
partner interest in BreitBurn Energy Partners I, L.P. (BEPI) from TIFD X-III LLC which owned
interests in the Sawtelle and East Coyote oil fields located in California, and to terminate
existing hedges related to future production from BEPI. On November 1, 2007, we sold 16,666,667
Common Units in a private placement at $27.00 per unit, resulting in proceeds of approximately $450
million. The net proceeds from this private placement were used to fund a portion of the cash
consideration for our acquisition from Quicksilver of properties located in Michigan, Indiana and
Kentucky (the Quicksilver Acquisition). Also on November 1, 2007, we issued 21,347,972 Common
Units to Quicksilver as partial consideration for the Quicksilver Acquisition as a private
placement.
Our general partner is BreitBurn GP, a Delaware limited liability company, also formed on
March 23, 2006. The board of directors of our General Partner has sole responsibility for
conducting our business and managing our operations. We conduct our operations through a wholly
owned subsidiary, BOLP and BOLPs general partner BOGP. We own all of the ownership interests in
BOLP and BOGP.
Our wholly owned subsidiary BreitBurn Management manages our assets and performs other
administrative services for us such as accounting, corporate development, finance, land
administration, legal and engineering. See Note 7 for information regarding our relationship with
BreitBurn Management.
On June 17, 2008, we purchased 14,404,962 Common Units from subsidiaries of Provident at
$23.26 per unit, for a purchase price of approximately $335 million (the Common Unit Purchase).
These units have been cancelled and are no longer outstanding. This purchase was accounted for as
a repurchase of issued Common Units and a cancellation of those Common Units. It increased debt by
$336.2 million and decreased equity by $336.2 million, including $1.2 million in capitalized
transaction costs.
On June 17, 2008, we also purchased Providents 95.55 percent limited liability company
interest in BreitBurn Management, which owned the General Partner, for a purchase price of
approximately $10 million (the BreitBurn Management Purchase). See Note 4 for the purchase price
allocation for this transaction. Also on June 17, 2008, we entered into a contribution agreement
(the Contribution Agreement) with the General Partner, BreitBurn Management and BreitBurn
Corporation, which is wholly owned by the Co-Chief Executive Officers of the General Partner,
Halbert S. Washburn and Randall H. Breitenbach, pursuant to which BreitBurn Corporation contributed
its 4.45 percent limited liability company interest in BreitBurn Management to us in exchange for
19,955 Common Units, the economic value of which was equivalent to the value of their combined 4.45
percent interest in BreitBurn Management, and BreitBurn Management contributed its 100 percent
limited liability company interest in the General Partner to us. On the same date, we entered into
Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership, pursuant to which the economic portion of the General Partners 0.66473 percent
general partner interest in us was eliminated and our limited partners holding Common Units were
given a right to nominate and vote in the election of directors to the Board of Directors of the
General Partner. As a result of these transactions (collectively, the Purchase, Contribution and
Partnership Transactions), the General Partner and BreitBurn Management became our wholly owned
subsidiaries.
On June 17, 2008, in connection with the Purchase, Contribution and Partnership Transactions,
we and our wholly owned subsidiaries entered into the First Amendment to Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, Limited Waiver and Consent and First Amendment to Security Agreement (Amendment
No. 1 to the Credit Agreement), with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative
agent. Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement increased the borrowing base available under the
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 1, 2007 from $750 million to $900 million. We
used borrowings under Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement to finance the Common Unit Purchase
and the BreitBurn Management Purchase.
On June 17, 2008, in connection with the Purchase, Contribution and Partnership Transactions,
the Omnibus Agreement, dated October 10, 2006, among us, the General Partner, Provident, Pro GP and
BEC was terminated in all respects.
As of December 31, 2008, the public unitholders, the institutional investors in our private
placements and Quicksilver owned 98.69 percent of the Common Units. BreitBurn Corporation owned
690,751 Common Units, representing a 1.31 percent limited partner interest. We own 100 percent of
the General Partner, BreitBurn Management and BOLP.
54
On August 26, 2008, members of our senior management, in their individual capacities, together
with Metalmark Capital Partners (Metalmark), Greenhill Capital Partners (Greenhill) and a
third-party institutional investor, completed the acquisition of BEC, our Predecessor. This
transaction included the acquisition of a 96.02 percent indirect interest in BEC, previously owned
by Provident, and the remaining indirect interests in BEC, previously owned by Randall H.
Breitenbach, Halbert S. Washburn and other members of the our senior management. BEC was a
separate U.S. subsidiary of Provident and was our Predecessor.
In connection with the acquisition of Providents ownership in BEC by members of senior
management, Metalmark, Greenhill and a third party institutional investor, BreitBurn Management has
entered into a five-year Administrative Services Agreement to manage BECs properties. In addition,
we have entered into an Omnibus Agreement with BEC detailing rights with respect to business
opportunities and providing us with a right of first offer with respect to the sale of assets by
BEC.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly
owned subsidiaries. Investments in affiliated companies with a 20 percent or
greater ownership interest, and in which we do not have control, are accounted for on the equity
basis. Investments in affiliated companies with less than a 20 percent ownership interest, and in
which we do not have control, are accounted for on the cost basis. Investments in which we own
greater than 50 percent interest are consolidated. Investments in which we own less than a 50
percent interest but are deemed to have control or where we have a variable interest in an entity
where we will absorb a majority of the entitys expected losses or receive a majority of the
entitys expected residual returns or both, however, are consolidated. The effects of all
intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
financial statements are based on a number of significant estimates including oil and gas reserve
quantities, which are the basis for the calculation of depletion, depreciation, amortization, asset
retirement obligations and impairment of oil and gas properties.
We account for business combinations using the purchase method, in accordance with SFAS No.
141 Accounting for Business Combinations. We use estimates to record the assets and liabilities
acquired. All purchase price allocations are finalized within one year from the acquisition date.
Basis of Presentation
Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Business segment information
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Segment reporting is not
applicable because our oil and gas operating areas have similar economic characteristics and meet
the criteria for aggregation as defined in SFAS No. 131. We acquire, exploit, develop and explore
for and produce oil and natural gas in the United States. Corporate management administers all
properties as a whole rather than as discrete operating segments. Operational data is tracked by
area; however, financial performance is measured as a single enterprise and not on an area-by-area
basis. Allocation of capital resources is employed on a project-by-project basis across our entire
asset base to maximize profitability without regard to individual areas.
Revenue recognition
Revenues associated with sales of our crude oil and natural gas are recognized when title
passes from us to our customer. Revenues from properties in which we have an interest with other
partners are recognized on the basis of our working interest
(entitlement method of
accounting). We generally market most of our natural gas production from our operated properties
and pay our partners for their working interest shares of natural gas production sold. As a
result, we have no material natural gas producer imbalance positions.
55
Cash and cash equivalents
We consider all investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. At December 31, 2008 we had no such investments.
Accounts Receivable
Our accounts receivable are primarily from purchasers of crude oil and natural gas and
counterparties to our financial instruments. Crude oil receivables are generally collected within
30 days after the end of the month. Natural gas receivables are generally collected within 60 days
after the end of the month. We review all outstanding accounts receivable balances and record a
reserve for amounts that we expect will not be fully recovered. Actual balances are not applied
against the reserve until substantially all collection efforts have been exhausted. During 2008 we
terminated our crude oil derivative instruments with Lehman Brothers due to their bankruptcy, and
at December 31, 2008, we had an allowance of $4.6 million related to these contracts.
Inventory
Oil inventories are carried at the lower of cost to produce or market price. We match
production expenses with crude oil sales. Production expenses associated with unsold crude oil
inventory are recorded as inventory.
Investments in Equity Affiliates
Income from equity affiliates is included as a component of operating income, as the
operations of these affiliates are associated with the processing and transportation of our natural
gas production.
Property, plant and equipment
Oil and gas properties
We follow the successful efforts method of accounting. Lease acquisition and development
costs (tangible and intangible) incurred, including internal acquisition costs, relating to proved
oil and gas properties are capitalized. Delay and surface rentals are charged to expense as
incurred. Dry hole costs incurred on exploratory wells are expensed. Dry hole costs associated
with developing proved fields are capitalized. Geological and geophysical costs related to
exploratory operations are expensed as incurred.
Upon sale or retirement of proved properties, the cost thereof and the accumulated depletion,
depreciation and amortization (DD&A) are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is
recognized in the statement of operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operating
expenses. DD&A of proved oil and gas properties, including the estimated cost of future
abandonment and restoration of well sites and associated facilities, are computed on a
property-by-property basis and recognized using the units-of-production method net of any
anticipated proceeds from equipment salvage and sale of surface rights. Other gathering and
processing facilities are recorded at cost and are depreciated using straight line, generally over
20 years.
Non-oil and gas assets
Buildings and non-oil and gas assets are recorded at cost and depreciated using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from 3 to 30 years.
Oil and natural gas reserve quantities
Reserves and their relation to estimated future net cash flows impact our depletion and
impairment calculations. As a result, adjustments to depletion are made concurrently with changes
to reserve estimates. We disclose reserve estimates, and the projected cash flows derived from
these reserve estimates, in accordance with SEC guidelines. The independent engineering firms
adhere to the SEC definitions when preparing their reserve reports.
Asset retirement obligations
We have significant obligations to plug and abandon oil and natural gas wells and related
equipment at the end of oil and natural gas production operations. The computation of our asset
retirement obligations (ARO) is prepared in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. This accounting
standard applies to the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation that is
recorded when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived
asset and the liability can be reasonably estimated. Over time, changes in the present value of
the liability are accreted and expensed. The capitalized asset costs are depreciated over the
useful lives of the corresponding asset. Recognized liability amounts are based upon future
retirement cost estimates and incorporate many assumptions such as: (1) expected economic
recoveries of crude oil and natural gas, (2) time to abandonment, (3) future inflation rates and
(4) the risk free rate of interest adjusted for our credit costs. Future revisions to ARO
56
estimates will impact the present value of existing ARO liabilities and corresponding adjustments will be
made to the capitalized asset retirement costs balance.
Impairment of assets
Long-lived assets with recorded values that are not expected to be recovered through future
cash flows are written-down to estimated fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 144 Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, as amended. Under SFAS 144, a long-lived asset
is tested for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be
recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of
the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.
If the carrying value exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss equal to
the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset is recognized. Fair
value is generally determined from estimated discounted future net cash flows. For purposes of
performing an impairment test, the undiscounted cash flows are forecast using five-year NYMEX
forward strip prices at the end of the period and escalated thereafter at 2.5 percent. For
impairment charges, the associated propertys expected future net cash flows are discounted using a
rate of approximately ten percent. Reserves are calculated based upon reports from third-party
engineers adjusted for acquisitions or other changes occurring during the year as determined to be
appropriate in the good faith judgment of management. Because of the low commodity prices that
existed at year end 2008, and the uncertainty surrounding future commodity prices and costs, we
performed impairment tests on our long-lived assets at December 31, 2008.
We assess our long-lived assets for impairment generally on a field-by-field basis where
applicable. In 2008, we recorded $51.9 million in impairments and $34.5 million in price related
depletion and depreciation adjustments. See Note 5 Impairments and Price Related Depletion and
Depreciation Adjustments. The charge was included in DD&A on the consolidated statement of operations.
Debt issuance costs
The costs incurred to obtain financing have been capitalized. Debt issuance costs are
amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related debt. Use of the
straight-line method does not differ materially from the effective interest method of
amortization.
Equity-based compensation
BreitBurn
Management had various forms of equity-based compensation
outstanding under employee compensation plans that are described more fully in Note 15.
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Predecessor adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123(R)), Share Based Payments, using the
modified-prospective transition method.
Under this transition method, unit based compensation awards granted prior to but not yet
vested as of January 1, 2006 that are classified as liabilities are charged to compensation
expense based on the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). We and the Predecessor recognized
these compensation costs on a graded-vesting method. Under the graded-vesting method a company
recognizes compensation cost over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche
of the award as though the award was, in substance, multiple awards.
Awards classified as equity are valued on the grant date and are recognized as compensation
expense over the vesting period.
Fair market value of financial instruments
The carrying amount of our cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses,
approximate their respective fair value due to the relatively short term of the related
instruments. The carrying amount of long-term debt approximates fair value; however, changes in
the credit markets at year-end may impact our ability to enter into future credit facilities at
similar terms.
Accounting for business combinations
We
have accounted for all business combinations using the purchase method,
in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Accounting for Business Combinations. Under the purchase method
of accounting, a business combination is accounted for at a purchase price based upon the fair
value of the consideration given, whether in the form of cash, assets, equity or the assumption of
liabilities. The assets and
57
liabilities acquired are measured at their fair values, and the purchase price is allocated to
the assets and liabilities based upon these fair values. The excess of the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed over the cost of an acquired entity, if any, is allocated as a pro
rata reduction of the amounts that otherwise would have been assigned to certain acquired assets.
We have not recognized any goodwill from any business combinations.
Concentration of credit risk
We maintain our cash accounts primarily with a single bank and invest cash in money market
accounts, which we believe to have minimal risk. As operator of jointly owned oil and gas
properties, we sell oil and gas production to U.S. oil and gas purchasers and pay vendors on behalf
of joint owners for oil and gas services. We periodically monitor our major purchasers credit
ratings.
Derivatives
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the
recognition of all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in our balance sheet and
measurement of those instruments at fair value. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value
is dependent upon whether or not a derivative instrument is designated as a hedge and if so, the
type of hedge. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are
recognized in other comprehensive income, to the extent the hedge is effective, until the hedged
item is recognized in earnings. Hedge effectiveness is measured based on the relative changes in
fair value between the derivative contract and the hedged item over time. Any change in fair value
resulting from ineffectiveness, as defined by SFAS No.133, is recognized immediately in earnings.
Gains and losses on derivative instruments not designated as hedges are currently included in
earnings. The resulting cash flows are reported as cash from operating activities. We currently
do not designate any of our derivatives as hedges for accounting purposes.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted
SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. Fair value measurement under SFAS No. 157 is based upon a hypothetical
transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the measurement date, considered from the
perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability. The objective of
fair value measurement as defined in SFAS No. 157 is to determine the price that would be received
in selling the asset or transferring the liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. If there is an active market for the asset or liability, the
fair value measurement shall represent the price in that market whether the price is directly
observable or otherwise obtained using a valuation technique.
Income taxes
Our subsidiaries are mostly partnerships or limited liability companies treated as
partnerships for federal tax purposes with essentially all taxable income or loss being passed
through to the members. As such, no federal income tax for these entities has been provided.
We have three wholly owned subsidiaries, which are subject to corporate income taxes. We
account for the taxes associated with one entity in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are recorded under the asset and liability method. Where
material, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the
financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or
deductible amounts in the future. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are
based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the differences are expected to
affect taxable income. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or
minus the change during the period in deferred income tax assets and liabilities.
Effective January 1, 2007, we implemented FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a companys financial
statements. A company can only recognize the tax position in the financial statements if the
position is more-likely-than-not to be upheld on audit based only on the technical merits of the
tax position. This accounting standard also provides guidance on thresholds, measurement,
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure,
and transition that is intended to provide better financial-statement comparability among different
companies.
We
performed an evaluation as of December 31, 2008 and
concluded that there were no uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the financial
statements. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
58
Net Income per unit
Weighted average units outstanding for computing basic and diluted net income per unit
were:
Year Ended
December 31,
2008
Weighted average
number of Common
Units used to
calculate basic and
diluted net income
or loss per unit:
Basic
59,238,588
Dilutive
1,322,107
Diluted
60,560,695
We had 6,700,000 Common Units authorized for issuance under our long-term incentive
compensation plans and there were approximately 1,422,171 partnership-based units outstanding that
are eligible for receiving Common Units upon vesting at December 31, 2008.
Environmental expenditures
We review, on an annual basis, our estimates of the cleanup costs of various sites. When it
is probable that obligations have been incurred and where a reasonable estimate of the cost of
compliance or remediation can be determined, the applicable amount is accrued. For other potential
liabilities, the timing of accruals coincides with the related ongoing site assessments. We do not
discount any of these liabilities. At December 31, 2008, we had a $2.0 million
environmental liability related to a closure of a drilling pit in Michigan, which we assumed in the
Quicksilver Acquisition.
3. Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement does not require
any new fair value measurements but would apply to assets and liabilities that are required to be
recorded at fair value under other accounting standards. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 12, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which defers
the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entitys financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Earlier adoption is permitted, provided the company has not yet
issued financial statements, including for interim periods, for that fiscal year. Effective
January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, as amended by FSP 157-2. Adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not
have a material impact on our results from operations or financial position.
SFAS No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
including an amendment of FAS 115 (SFAS No. 159). In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No.
159 which allows entities to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial
assets and liabilities at fair value in situations in which they are not otherwise required to be
measured at fair value. If a company elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in
that items fair value in subsequent reporting periods must be recognized in current earnings. The
provisions of SFAS No. 159 became effective for us on January 1, 2008. We have elected not to
adopt the fair value option allowed by SFAS No. 159, and, therefore, it had no impact on our
financial position, results from operations or cash flows.
SFAS No. 141(revised 2007) Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R). In December 2007, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 141R which replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree
and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141R was issued in an effort to continue the movement toward
the greater use of fair values in financial reporting and increased transparency through expanded
disclosures. It changes how business acquisitions are accounted for and will impact financial
statements at the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. Certain of these changes will
introduce more volatility into earnings. The acquirer must now record all assets and liabilities of
the acquired business at fair value, and related transaction and restructuring costs will be
expensed rather than the previous method of being capitalized as part of the acquisition. SFAS No.
141R also impacts the goodwill impairment test associated with acquisitions, including those that
close before the effective date of SFAS No. 141R. The definitions of a business and a business
combination have been expanded, resulting in more transactions qualifying as business
combinations. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 31, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. We may
experience a financial statement impact depending on the nature and extent of any new business
combinations entered into after the effective date of SFAS No. 141R.
59
SFAS
No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment
of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 which requires
that accounting and reporting for minority interests be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests
and classified as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 also establishes reporting requirements that
provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect
only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or
that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a material impact on our
results from operations or financial position.
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 which
requires enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its
related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 has the same scope as
Statement 133, and, accordingly, applies to all entities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. This
statement will require the additional disclosures detailed above.
FSP 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). In April
2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve
consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combination and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not expect the
adoption of FSP 142-3 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS No. 162).
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162 which identifies the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162 became effective November
13, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 did not have an impact on our results from operations or
financial position.
FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions
Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1.
Under this FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents, whether they are paid or unpaid, are considered participating
securities and should be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the
two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. In addition, all prior
period earnings per share data presented should be adjusted retrospectively and early application
is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 may have on
our earnings per share disclosures.
On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued Release No. 33-8995 for guidelines on new reserves
estimate calculations and related disclosures. The new reserve estimate disclosures apply to all
annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009 and thereafter, and to all
registration statements filed after that date. It does not permit companies to voluntarily comply
at an earlier date. The revised proved reserve definition incorporates a new definition of
reasonable certainty using the PRMS (Petroleum Resource Management System) standard of high
degree of confidence for deterministic method estimates, or a 90 percent recovery probability for
probabilistic methods used in estimating proved reserves. The guideline also permits a company to
establish undeveloped reserves as proved with appropriate degrees of reasonable certainty
established absent actual production tests and without artificially limiting such reserves to
spacing units adjacent to a producing well. For reserve reporting purposes, it also replaces the
end-of-the-year oil and gas reserve pricing with an unweighted average first-day-of-the-month
pricing for the past 12 fiscal months. This would impact depletion calculations. Costs associated
with reserves will continue to be measured on the last day of the fiscal year. A revised tabular
presentation of reserves by development category, final product type, and oil and gas activity
disclosure by geographic regions and significant fields and a general disclosure of the internal
controls a company uses to assure objectivity in reserves estimation will be required. The
adoption of SEC release No. 33-8995 is expected to have a material impact, which cannot be
quantified at this point, on the calculation of our crude oil and natural gas reserves.
60
4. Acquisitions
On June 17, 2008, we purchased Providents 95.55 percent limited liability company interest in
BreitBurn Management for a purchase price of approximately $10.0 million. This transaction
resulted in BreitBurn Management becoming our wholly owned subsidiary and was accounted for as a
business combination. The following table presents the purchase price allocation of the BreitBurn
Management Purchase:
Thousands of dollars
Related party receivables current, net
$
10,662
Other current assets
21
Oil and gas properties
8,451
Non-oil and gas assets
4,343
Related party receivables non-current
6,704
Current liabilities
(13,510
)
Long-term liabilities
(6,704
)
$
9,967
Certain of the current and long-term related party receivables are with the Partnership, so
they are now eliminated in consolidation.
5. Impairments and Price Related Depletion and Depreciation Adjustments
Because of the low commodity prices at year end 2008, and the uncertainty surrounding future
commodity prices as well as future costs, we performed impairment tests on our long-lived assets at
December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded approximately $51.9 million
for total impairments and $34.5 million for price related adjustments to depletion and depreciation
expense.
We assess our developed and undeveloped oil and gas properties and other long-lived assets for
possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of
the assets may not be recoverable. Such indicators include changes in business plans, changes in
commodity prices and, for crude oil and natural gas properties, significant downward revisions of
estimated proved-reserve quantities. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds the future
undiscounted cash flows expected from the asset, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess of
carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value.
Determination as to whether and how much an asset is impaired involves management estimates on
highly uncertain matters such as future commodity prices, the effects of inflation and technology
improvements on operating expenses, production profiles, and the outlook for market supply and
demand conditions for crude oil and natural gas. The impairment reviews and calculations are based
on assumptions that are consistent with our business plans. See Impairment of Assets in Note 2.
The low commodity price environment that existed at December 31, 2008 influenced our future
commodity price projections. As a result, the expected discounted cash flows for many of our
fields (i.e., fair values) were negatively impacted resulting in a charge to depletion and
depreciation expense of approximately $51.9 million for field impairments for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
An estimate as to the sensitivity to earnings for these periods if other assumptions had been
used in impairment reviews and calculations is not practicable, given the number of assumptions
involved in the estimates. That is, favorable changes to some assumptions might have avoided the
need to impair any assets in these periods, whereas unfavorable changes might have caused an
additional unknown number of other assets to become impaired.
Lower commodity prices also negatively impacted our oil and gas reserves in the fourth quarter
of 2008 resulting in significant price related adjustments to our depletion and depreciation
expense in the fourth quarter of 2008 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2007. These price
61
related reserve reductions in 2008 resulted in additional depletion and depreciation charges of
approximately $34.5 million for the fourth quarter and for the year ended December 31, 2008.
6. Income Taxes
We, and all of our subsidiaries, with the exception of Phoenix Production
Company, Alamitos Company and BreitBurn Management, are partnerships or limited liability companies
treated as partnerships for federal and state income tax purposes. Essentially all of our taxable
income or loss, which may differ considerably from the net income or loss reported for financial
reporting purposes, is passed through to the federal income tax returns of our partners. As such,
we have not recorded any federal income tax expense for those pass-through entities. State income
tax expenses are recorded for certain operations that are subject to state taxation in various
states, primarily Michigan, California and Texas. The total state taxes paid were $0.5 million in
2008.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Phoenix Production Company, is a tax-paying corporation. We
record an income tax provision in accordance with SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes. In
2008, Phoenix Production Company recorded $0.1 million for alternative minimum taxes. Phoenix Production Company also recorded a deferred
federal income tax expense of $1.2 million in 2008. The following is a reconciliation for Phoenix Production Company of federal
income taxes at the statutory rates to federal income tax expense or benefit as reported in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Year Ended
December 31,
Thousands of dollars
2008
Income before taxes and minority interest
$
380,363
Partnership income not subject to tax
376,459
Income subject to tax
3,904
Federal income tax rate
34
Income tax at statutory rate
1,327
Other
Income tax expense
$
1,327
At
December 31, 2008, a net deferred federal income tax
liability of $4.3 million was included in our consolidated balance sheet for Phoenix Production
Company. As shown in the table below, the net deferred federal income tax liability primarily
consisted of the tax effect of book and tax basis differences of certain assets and liabilities and
the deferred federal income tax asset for net operating loss carry forwards. Management expects to
utilize $2.3 million of estimated unused operating loss carry forwards to offset future taxable
income. As such, no valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred federal income tax
asset.
December 31,
Thousands of dollars
2008
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards
$
767
Asset retirement obligation
337
Unrealized hedge loss
Other
103
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation, depletion and intangible drilling costs
(3,404
)
Other
(2,085
)
Net deferred tax liability
$
(4,282
)
In 2008, our other wholly-owned tax-paying corporation, Alamitos Company, incurred a current
federal tax expense of $0.1 million. No deferred federal or state income tax is recognized for
this company as the temporary differences between the tax basis and the reported financial amounts
of its assets and liabilities are immaterial. BreitBurn Management became our wholly-owned
subsidiary and a taxable entity on June 17, 2008. However, no federal or state income tax expense
is expected due to the nature of its business as expenses incurred are essentially offset by
amounts recovered for services provided to the operating companies.
Cash paid
for federal and state income taxes was $0.6 million in 2008.
62
New Accounting Pronouncement
Effective January 1, 2007, we implemented FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a companys financial
statements. A company can only recognize the tax position in the financial statements if the
position is more-likely-than-not to be upheld on audit based only on the technical merits of the
tax position. This accounting standard also provides guidance on thresholds, measurement,
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure,
and transition that is intended to provide better financial-statement comparability among different
companies.
We
performed an evaluation as of December 31, 2008 and
concluded that there were no uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the financial
statements. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
7. Related Party Transactions
BreitBurn Management operates our assets and performs other administrative services for us
such as accounting, corporate development, finance, land administration, legal and engineering.
All of our employees, including our executives, are employees of BreitBurn Management. Prior to
June 17, 2008, BreitBurn Management provided services to us and to BEC, and allocated its expenses
between the two entities. On June 17, 2008, in connection with the Purchase, Contribution and
Partnership Transactions, BreitBurn Management became our wholly owned subsidiary and entered into
an Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement with BEC, pursuant to which BreitBurn
Management agreed to continue to provide administrative services to BEC, in exchange for a monthly
fee of $775,000 for indirect expenses. In addition to the monthly fee, BreitBurn Management agreed
to continue to charge BEC for direct expenses including incentive plan costs and direct payroll and
administrative costs. Beginning on June 17, 2008, all of the costs charged to BOLP are
consolidated with our results.
On August 26, 2008, members of our senior management, in their individual capacities, together
with Metalmark, Greenhill and a third-party institutional investor, completed the acquisition of
BEC, our Predecessor. This transaction included the acquisition of a 96.02 percent indirect
interest in BEC previously owned by Provident and the remaining indirect interests in BEC
previously owned by Randall H. Breitenbach, Halbert S. Washburn and other members of our senior
management. BEC was an indirectly owned subsidiary of Provident.
In connection with the acquisition of Providents ownership in BEC by members of senior
management, Metalmark, Greenhill and a third party institutional investor, BreitBurn Management
entered into a five year Administrative Services Agreement to manage BECs properties. The monthly
fee charged to BEC remained $775,000 for indirect expenses through December 31, 2008. We expect
this fee to be renegotiated annually during the term of the agreement and expect a monthly fee of
less than $775,000 in 2009. In addition, we have entered into an Omnibus Agreement with BEC
detailing rights with respect to business opportunities and providing us with a right of first
offer with respect to the sale of assets by BEC.
At
December 31, 2008, we had current receivables of $4.4 million due from
BEC related to the Administrative Services Agreement, outstanding liabilities for
employee related costs and oil and gas sales made by BEC on our behalf from certain
properties. In 2008, total oil and gas sales made on our behalf for these
properties were approximately $2.1 million.
Mr. Greg L. Armstrong is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Plains All
American GP LLC (PAA). Mr. Armstrong was a director of our General Partner until March 26, 2008
when his resignation became effective. We sell all of the crude oil produced from our Florida
properties to Plains Marketing, L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of PAA. In 2008, prior to Mr.
Armstrongs resignation on March 26, 2008, we sold $19.3 million of our
crude oil to Plains Marketing, L.P.
Through
a transition services agreement through March 2008, Quicksilver provided services to
us for accounting, land administration, and marketing and charged us $0.9 million for
the first three months of 2008.
These charges were included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements
of operations. Quicksilver also buys natural gas from us in Michigan.
For the year ended
63
December 31, 2008, total net gas sales to Quicksilver were approximately $8.0 million and the
related receivable was $0.6 million as of December 31, 2008.
At December 31, 2008, we had a receivable of $0.1 million for management fees due from equity
affiliates and operational expenses incurred on behalf of equity affiliates.
On June 17, 2008, in connection with the Purchase, Contribution and Partnership Transactions,
the Omnibus Agreement, dated October 10, 2006, among us, the General Partner, Provident, Pro GP and
BEC was terminated in all respects and Provident is no longer considered a related party.
8. Inventory
Our crude
oil inventory from our Florida operations at December 31, 2008
was $1.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold 762 MBbls of crude oil and produced 707
MBbls from our Florida operations. Crude oil inventory additions are at cost and represent our
production costs. We match production expenses with crude oil sales. Production expenses associated with unsold crude oil inventory are recorded
to inventory. Crude oil sales are a function of the number and size of crude oil shipments in each
quarter and thus crude oil sales do not always coincide with volumes produced in a given quarter.
We carry inventory at the lower of cost or market. When using lower of cost or market to
value inventory, market should not exceed the net realizable value or the estimated selling price
less costs of completion and disposal. During the fourth quarter of 2008, commodity prices
decreased substantially. As a result, we assessed our crude oil inventory for possible write-down,
and recorded $1.2 million to write-down the Florida crude oil inventory to our net realizable value
at December 31, 2008.
For our properties in Florida, there are a limited number of alternative methods of
transportation for our production. Substantially all of our oil production is transported by
pipelines, trucks and barges owned by third parties. The inability or unwillingness of these
parties to provide transportation services for a reasonable fee could result in our having to find
transportation alternatives, increased transportation costs, or involuntary curtailment of our oil
production in Florida, which could have a negative impact on our future consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
9. Intangibles
In May 2007, we acquired certain interests in oil leases and related assets through the
acquisition of a limited liability company from Calumet Florida, L.L.C. As part of this
acquisition, we assumed certain crude oil sales contracts for the remainder of 2007 and for 2008
through 2010. A $3.4 million intangible asset was established to value the portion of the crude
oil contracts that were above market at closing in the purchase price allocation. Realized gains
or losses from these contracts are recognized as part of oil sales and the intangible asset will be
amortized over the life of the contracts. As of December 31, 2008, our intangible asset related to
the crude oil sales contracts was $1.6 million.
In November 2007, we acquired oil and gas properties and facilities from Quicksilver. Included
in the Quicksilver purchase price was a $5.2 million intangible asset related to retention bonuses.
In connection with the acquisition, we entered into an agreement with Quicksilver which provides
for Quicksilver to fund retention bonuses payable to 139 former Quicksilver employees in the event
these employees remain continuously employed by BreitBurn Management from November 1, 2007 through
November 1, 2009 or in the event of termination without cause, disability or death. The
amortization expense of $2.1 million for 2008 is included in the total
operating expenses line on the consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2008, our
intangible asset related to Quicksilver retention bonuses was $1.7 million.
10. Equity Investments
We had
equity investments at December 31, 2008 of $9.5 million.
These investments are reported in the Equity
investments line caption on the consolidated balance sheet and primarily represent
investments in natural gas processing facilities. For the year ended December 31,
2008, we recorded $0.8 million in earnings
from equity investments. Earnings from equity investments are reported in the Other
Revenue line caption on the consolidated statement of operations.
At December 31, 2008, our equity investments consisted primarily of a 24.5 percent limited partner
interest and a 25.5 percent general partner interest in Wilderness Energy Services LP, with a
combined carrying value of $8.2 million. The remaining $1.3 million consists of smaller interests
in several other investments.
64
11. Long-Term Debt
On November 1, 2007, in connection with the Quicksilver Acquisition, BOLP, as borrower, and we
and our wholly owned subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a four year, $1.5 billion amended
and restated revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
LLC and a syndicate of banks (the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).
The initial borrowing base of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was $700 million and
was increased to $750 million on April 10, 2008. Under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,
borrowings were allowed to be used (i) to pay a portion of the purchase price for the Quicksilver
Acquisition, (ii) for standby letters of credit, (iii) for working capital purposes, (iv) for
general company purposes and (v) for certain permitted acquisitions and payments enumerated by the
credit facility. Borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are secured by
first-priority liens on and security interests in substantially all of the Partnerships and
certain of its subsidiaries assets, representing not less than 80 percent of the total value of
their oil and gas properties.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains (i) financial covenants, including
leverage, current assets and interest coverage ratios, and (ii) customary covenants, including
restrictions on the Partnerships ability to: incur additional indebtedness; make certain
investments, loans or advances; make distributions to unitholders or repurchase units if aggregated
letters of credit and outstanding loan amounts exceed 90 percent of its borrowing base; make
dispositions; or enter into a merger or sale of its property or assets, including the sale or
transfer of interests in its subsidiaries.
The events that constitute an Event of Default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement) include: payment defaults; misrepresentations; breaches of covenants; cross-default and
cross-acceleration to certain other indebtedness; adverse judgments against the Partnership in
excess of a specified amount; changes in management or control; loss of permits; failure to perform
under a material agreement; certain insolvency events; assertion of certain environmental claims;
and occurrence of a material adverse effect. At December 31, 2008, the
Partnership was in compliance with the credit facilitys covenants.
On June 17, 2008, in connection with the Purchase, Contribution and Partnership Transactions,
we and our wholly owned subsidiaries entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (the
Agent). Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement increased the borrowing base available under the
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, from $750 million to $900 million. In addition, Amendment
No. 1 to the Credit Agreement enacted certain additional amendments, waivers and consents to the
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the related Security Agreement, dated November 1, 2007,
among BOLP, certain of its subsidiaries and the Agent, necessary to permit the Amendment No. 1 to
the First Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement and the transactions consummated in
the Purchase, Contribution and Partnership Transactions. Under Amendment No. 1 to the Credit
Agreement, the interest margins applicable to borrowings, the letter of credit fee and the
commitment fee under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were increased by amounts ranging
from 12.5 to 25 basis points.
As of December 31, 2008, approximately $736.0 million in indebtedness was outstanding under
the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The credit facility will mature on November 1, 2011.
At December 31, 2008, the LIBOR interest rate, a weighted average interest rate of our four
outstanding LIBOR loans, was 2.350 percent on the LIBOR portion of $736.0 million.
The credit facility contains customary covenants, including restrictions on our ability to:
incur additional indebtedness; make certain investments, loans or advances; make distributions to
our unitholders (including the restriction in our ability to make distributions if aggregated
letters of credit and outstanding loan amounts exceed 90 percent of our borrowing base); make
dispositions or enter into sales and leasebacks; or enter into a merger or sale of our property or
assets, including the sale or transfer of interests in our subsidiaries.
As of
December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with the credit facilitys covenants.
At December 31, 2008, we had $0.3 million in letters of
credit outstanding.
65
Our interest expense is detailed in the following table:
Year Ended
December 31,
Thousands of dollars
2008
Credit facility
$
25,487
Commitment fees
1,047
Amortization of discount and deferred issuance costs
2,613
Total
$
29,147
Cash paid for interest on Credit facility
(including realized losses on interest rate swaps)
$
29,767
12. Asset Retirement Obligation
Our asset retirement obligation is based on our net ownership in wells and facilities and our
estimate of the costs to abandon and remediate those wells and facilities as well as our estimate
of the future timing of the costs to be incurred. The total undiscounted amount of future cash
flows required to settle our asset retirement obligations is estimated to be $256.8 million
at December 31, 2008. Payments to settle asset retirement obligations occur over the operating lives of the assets, estimated to be from 7 to 50
years. Estimated cash flows have been discounted at our credit adjusted risk free rate of 7
percent and adjusted for inflation using a rate of 2 percent. Changes in the asset retirement
obligation for the year ended December 31, 2008 are presented in the following table:
Year Ended December 31,
Thousands of dollars
2008
Carrying amount, beginning of period
$
27,819
Liabilities settled in the current period
(1,054
)
Revisions (1)
1,363
Acquisitions
Accretion expense
1,958
Carrying amount, end of period
$
30,086
(1)
Increased cost estimates and revisions to reserve life.
13. Partners Equity
At December 31, 2008, we had 52,635,634 Common Units outstanding.
On June 17, 2008, we purchased 14,404,962 Common Units from subsidiaries of Provident at
$23.26 per unit, for a purchase price of approximately $335 million. These units have been
cancelled and are no longer outstanding. This transaction was accounted for as a repurchase of
issued Common Units and a cancellation of those Common Units. This transaction decreased equity by
$336.2 million, including $1.2 million in capitalized transaction costs. We also purchased
Providents 95.55 percent limited liability company interest in BreitBurn Management, which owned
the General Partner. Also on June 17, 2008, we entered into a Contribution Agreement with the
General Partner, BreitBurn Management and BreitBurn Corporation, pursuant to which BreitBurn
Corporation contributed its 4.45 percent limited liability company interest in BreitBurn Management
to us in exchange for 19,955 Common Units and BreitBurn Management contributed its 100 percent
limited liability company interest in the General Partner to us. On the same date, we entered into
Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership, pursuant to which the economic portion of the General Partners 0.66473 percent
general partner interest in us was eliminated. As a result of these transactions, the General
Partner and BreitBurn Management became our wholly owned subsidiaries.
On December 22, 2008, we entered into a Unit Purchase Rights Agreement, dated as of December
22, 2008 (the Rights Agreement), between us and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, as
Rights Agent. Under the Rights Agreement, each holder of Common Units at the close of business on
December 31, 2008 automatically received a distribution of one unit purchase right (a Right),
which entitles the registered holder to purchase from us one additional Common Unit at a price of
$40.00 per Common Unit, subject to adjustment. We entered into the Rights agreement to increase the
likelihood that our unitholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of a takeover
proposal.
66
The issuance of the Rights was not taxable to the holders of the Common Units, had no dilutive
effect, will not affect our reported earnings per Common Unit, and will not change the method of
trading the Common Units. The Rights will not trade separately from the Common Units
unless the Rights become exercisable. The Rights will become exercisable if a person or group
acquires beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of the outstanding Common Units or commences,
or announces its intention to commence, a tender offer that could result in beneficial ownership of
20 percent or more of the outstanding Common Units. If the Rights become exercisable, each Right
will entitle holders, other than the acquiring party, to purchase a number of Common Units having a
market value of twice the then-current exercise price of the Right. Such provision will not apply
to any person who, prior to the adoption of the Rights Agreement, beneficially owns 20 percent or
more of the outstanding Common Units until such person acquires beneficial ownership of any
additional Common Units.
The Rights Agreement has a term of three years and will expire on December 22, 2011, unless
the term is extended, the Rights are earlier redeemed or we terminate the Rights Agreement.
Cash Distributions
The partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our available cash quarterly.
Available cash is cash on hand, including cash from borrowings, at the end of a quarter after the
payment of expenses and the establishment of reserves for future capital expenditures and
operational needs. We may fund a portion of capital expenditures with additional borrowings or
issuances of additional units. We may also borrow to make distributions to unitholders, for
example, in circumstances where we believe that the distribution level is sustainable over the long
term, but short-term factors have caused available cash from operations to be insufficient to pay
the distribution at the current level. The partnership agreement does not restrict our ability to
borrow to pay distributions. The cash distribution policy reflects a basic judgment that
unitholders will be better served by us distributing our available cash, after expenses and
reserves, rather than retaining it.
Distributions are not cumulative. Consequently, if distributions on Common Units are not paid
with respect to any fiscal quarter at the initial distribution rate, our unitholders will not be
entitled to receive such payments in the future.
Distributions are paid within 45 days of the end of each fiscal quarter to holders of record
on or about the first or second week of each such month. If the distribution date does not fall on
a business day, the distribution will be made on the business day immediately preceding the
indicated distribution date.
We do not have a legal obligation to pay distributions at any rate except as provided in the
partnership agreement. Our distribution policy is consistent with the terms of our partnership
agreement, which requires that we distribute all of our available cash quarterly. Under the
partnership agreement, available cash is defined to generally mean, for each fiscal quarter, cash
generated from our business in excess of the amount of reserves the General Partner determines is
necessary or appropriate to provide for the conduct of the business, to comply with applicable law,
any of its debt instruments or other agreements or to provide for future distributions to its
unitholders for any one or more of the upcoming four quarters. The partnership agreement provides
that any determination made by the General Partner in its capacity as general partner must be made
in good faith and that any such determination will not be subject to any other standard imposed by
the partnership agreement, the Delaware limited partnership statute or any other law, rule or
regulation or at equity.
On February 14, 2008, we paid a cash distribution of approximately $30.5 million to our
General Partner and common unitholders of record as of the close of business on February 11, 2008.
The distribution that was paid to unitholders was $0.4525 per Common Unit.
On May 15, 2008, we paid a cash distribution of approximately $33.7 million to our General
Partner and common unitholders of record as of the close of business on May 9, 2008. The
distribution that was paid to unitholders was $0.50 per Common Unit.
On August 14, 2008, we paid a cash distribution of approximately $27.4 million to our common
unitholders of record as of the close of business on August 11, 2008. The distribution that was
paid to unitholders was $0.52 per Common Unit.
On November 14, 2008, we paid a cash distribution of approximately $27.4 million to our common
unitholders of record as of the close of business on November 10, 2008. The distribution that was
paid to unitholders was $0.52 per Common Unit.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we made payments equivalent to the distributions made
to unitholders of $2.3 million on Restricted Phantom Units and Convertible Phantom Units issued
under our Long-Term Incentive Plans.
2007 Private Placements
On May 24, 2007, we sold 4,062,500 Common Units, at a negotiated purchase price of $32.00 per
unit, to certain investors (the Purchasers). We used $108 million from such sale to fund the
cash consideration for the Calumet Acquisition and the remaining $22 million of the proceeds was
used to repay indebtedness under our credit facility. Most of the debt repaid was associated with
our first quarter 2007 acquisition of the Lazy JL Field properties in West Texas.
67
On May 25, 2007, we sold an additional 2,967,744 Common Units to the same Purchasers at a
negotiated purchase price of $31.00 per unit. We used the proceeds of approximately $92 million to
fund the BEPI Acquisition, including the termination of existing hedge contracts related to future
production from BEPI.
On November 1, 2007, we sold 16,666,667 Common Units, at a negotiated purchase price of $27.00
per unit, to certain investors in a third private placement. We used the proceeds from such sale
to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the Quicksilver Acquisition. Also on November 1,
2007, we issued 21,347,972 Common Units to Quicksilver as partial consideration for the Quicksilver
Acquisition as a private placement.
In connection with the private placements of Common Units to finance the Quicksilver
Acquisition, we entered into registration rights agreements with the institutional investors in our
private placements and Quicksilver to file shelf registration statements to register the resale of
the Common Units sold or issued in the Private Placements and to use our commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the registration statements to become effective with respect to the Common Units
sold to the institutional investors not later than August 2, 2008 and, with respect to the Common
Units issued to Quicksilver, within one year from November 1, 2007. Quicksilver is prohibited from
selling any of the Common Units issued to it prior to the first anniversary of November 1, 2007 or
more than 50 percent of such Common Units prior to eighteen months after November 1, 2007. In
addition, the agreements give the institutional investors and Quicksilver piggyback registration
rights under certain circumstances. These registration rights are transferable to affiliates of
the institutional investors and Quicksilver and, in certain circumstances, to third parties.
On July 31, 2008, the registration statement relating to the resale of the Common Units issued
in the private placement to the institutional investors was declared effective. On October 28,
2008, the registration statement relating to the resale of the Common Units issued in the private
placement to Quicksilver was declared effective.
14. Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our commodity price risk management program is intended to reduce our exposure to commodity
prices and to assist with stabilizing cash flow and distributions. Routinely, we utilize
derivative financial instruments to reduce this volatility. During 2008, there has been extreme
volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets which has reached unprecedented levels
and may adversely affect the financial condition of our derivative counterparties. Although each
of our derivative counterparties carried an S&P credit rating of A or above at December 31, 2008,
we could be exposed to losses if a counterparty fails to perform in accordance with the terms of
the contract. This risk is managed by diversifying the derivative portfolio among counterparties
meeting certain financial criteria.
Commodity Activities
The derivative instruments we utilize are based on index prices that may and often do differ
from the actual crude oil and natural gas prices realized in our operations. These variations
often result in a lack of adequate correlation to enable these derivative instruments to qualify
for cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, we do not attempt to account for our
derivative instruments as cash flow hedges and instead recognize changes in the fair value
immediately in earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2008 we had realized losses of $55.9
million and unrealized gains of $388.0 million relating to our market based commodity contracts.
We had net financial instruments receivable relating to our commodity contracts of $292.3 million
at December 31, 2008.
On September 19, 2008, due to Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, we terminated our crude oil
derivative instruments with Lehman Brothers. Our derivative contract with Lehman Brothers,
commonly referred to as a zero cost collar, was for oil volumes of 1,000 Bbls/d for the full year
2011. This represented approximately 8 percent of our total 2011 oil and natural gas hedge
portfolio. The floor price for the collar was $105.00 per Bbl and the ceiling price was $174.50 per
Bbl. This contract was replaced with contracts by substantially similar terms, with different
counterparties, for oil volumes of 1,000 Bbls/d covering January 1, 2011 to January 31, 2011 and
March 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.
68
We had the following contracts in place at December 31, 2008:
Year
Year
Year
Year
2009
2010
2011
2012
Gas Positions:
Fixed Price Swaps:
Hedged Volume (MMBtu/d)
45,802
43,869
25,955
19,129
Average Price ($/MMBtu)
$
8.14
$
8.20
$
9.21
$
10.12
Collars:
Hedged Volume (MMBtu/d)
1,740
3,405
16,016
19,129
Average Floor Price ($/MMBtu)
$
9.00
$
9.00
$
9.00
$
9.00
Average Ceiling Price ($/MMBtu)
$
16.36
$
12.79
$
11.28
$
11.89
Total:
Hedged Volume (MMMBtu/d)
47,542
47,275
41,971
38,257
Average Price ($/MMBtu)
$
8.17
$
8.26
$
9.13
$
9.56
Oil Positions:
Fixed Price Swaps:
Hedged Volume (Bbls/d)
1,838
2,308
2,116
1,939
Average Price ($/Bbl)
$
75.51
$
83.12
$
88.26
$
90.00
Participating Swaps: (a)
Hedged Volume (Bbls/d)
2,847
1,993
1,439
Average Price ($/Bbl)
$
62.86
$
64.40
$
61.29
$
Average Part. %
60.9
%
55.5
%
53.2
%
Collars:
Hedged Volume (Bbls/d)
594
1,279
2,048
3,077
Average Floor Price ($/Bbl)
$
92.31
$
102.84
$
103.43
$
110.00
Average Ceiling Price ($/Bbl)
$
122.92
$
136.16
$
152.61
$
145.39
Floors:
Hedged Volume (Bbls/d)
500
500
Average Floor Price ($/Bbl)
$
100.00
$
100.00
$
$
Total:
Hedged Volume (Bbls/d)
5,778
6,080
5,603
5,016
Average Price ($/Bbl)
$
73.12
$
82.52
$
86.88
$
102.27
(a)
A participating swap combines a swap and a call option with the same strike price.
Interest Rate Activities
We are subject to interest rate risk associated with loans under our credit facility that bear
interest based on floating rates. As of December 31, 2008, our total debt outstanding was $736.0
million. In order to mitigate our interest rate exposure, we had the following interest rate swaps
in place at December 31, 2008, to fix a portion of floating LIBOR-base debt on our credit facility:
Notional amounts in thousands of dollars
Notional Amount
Fixed Rate
Period Covered
January 1, 2009 to January 8, 2009
$
50,000
3.6200
%
January 1, 2009 to January 20, 2009
200,000
3.6825
%
January 1, 2009 to July 8, 2009
50,000
3.0450
%
January 1, 2009 to January 8, 2010
100,000
3.3873
%
January 20, 2009 to July 20, 2009
250,000
3.6825
%
July 20, 2009 to December 20, 2010
300,000
3.6825
%
December 20, 2010 to October 20, 2011
200,000
2.9900
%
69
On September 19, 2008, due to Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, we terminated, at no cost, our
interest rate swap with Lehman Brothers on $50 million at a fixed rate of 3.438 percent, which
covered the period from January 8, 2008 to July 8, 2009. On October 2, 2008, we entered into a new
interest rate swap on $50 million at a fixed rate of 3.0450 percent, for the period from September
8, 2008 to July 8, 2009. These transactions are reflected in the table above.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we had realized losses of $2.7 million and unrealized
losses of $17.3 million relating to our interest rate swaps. We had net financial instruments
payable related to our interest rate swaps of $17.3 million at December 31, 2008.
Balance Sheet presentation of commodity and interest derivatives is as follows:
Oil
Natural Gas
Commodity
Commodity
Interest Rate
Total Financial
Thousands of dollars
Derivatives
Derivatives
Derivatives
Instruments
Balance, December 31, 2008
Short-term assets
$
44,086
$
32,138
$
$
76,224
Long-term assets
145,061
73,942
219,003
Total assets
189,147
106,080
295,227
Short-term liabilities
(1,115
)
(9,077
)
(10,192
)
Long-term liabilities
(1,820
)
(8,238
)
(10,058
)
Total liabilities
(2,935
)
(17,315
)
(20,250
)
Net assets (liabilities)
$
186,212
$
106,080
$
(17,315
)
$
274,977
While our commodity price risk management program is intended to reduce our exposure to
commodity prices and assist with stabilizing cash flow and distributions, to the extent we have
hedged a significant portion of our expected production and the cost for goods and services
increases, our margins would be adversely affected.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. Fair value measurement under SFAS No. 157 is based upon a hypothetical
transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the measurement date, considered from the
perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability. The objective of
fair value measurement as defined in SFAS No. 157 is to determine the price that would be received
in selling the asset or transferring the liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. If there is an active market for the asset or liability, the
fair value measurement shall represent the price in that market whether the price is directly
observable or otherwise obtained using a valuation technique.
SFAS No. 157 requires valuation techniques consistent with the market approach, income
approach or the cost approach to be used to measure fair value. The market approach uses prices
and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable
assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future cash flows
or earnings to a single present value amount and is based upon current market expectations about
those future amounts. The cost approach, sometimes referred to as the current replacement cost
approach, is based upon the amount that would currently be required to replace the service capacity
of an asset.
We principally use the income approach for our recurring fair value measurements and strive to
use the best information available. We use valuation techniques that maximize the use of
observable inputs and obtain the majority of our inputs from published objective sources or third
party market participants. We incorporate the impact of nonperformance risk, including credit
risk, into our fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques into three broad levels based upon how observable those inputs are. The highest
priority of Level 1 is given to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities and the lowest priority of Level 3 is given to unobservable inputs. We categorize our
fair value financial instruments based upon the objectivity of the inputs and how observable those
inputs are. The three levels of inputs as defined in SFAS No. 157 are described further as
follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as
of the reporting date. Active markets are markets in which transactions for the asset or liability
occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. An
example of a Level 1 input would be quoted prices for exchange traded commodity futures contracts.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices that are included in Level 1. Level 2 includes
financial instruments that are actively traded but are valued using models or other valuation
methodologies. These models include industry standard models that consider standard assumptions
70
such as quoted forward prices for commodities, interest rates, volatilities, current market
and contractual prices for underlying assets as well as other relevant factors. Substantially all
of these inputs are evident in the market place throughout the terms of the financial instruments
and can be derived by observable data, including third party data providers. These inputs may also
include observable transactions in the market place. We consider the over the counter (OTC)
commodity and interest rate swaps in our portfolio to be Level 2. These are assets and liabilities
that can be bought and sold in active markets and quoted prices are available from multiple
potential counterparties.
Level 3 Inputs that are not directly observable for the asset or liability and are
significant to the fair value of the asset or liability. These inputs generally reflect
managements estimates of the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the
instruments. Level 3 includes financial instruments that are not actively traded and have little
or no observable data for input into industry standard models. Level 3 instruments primarily
include derivative instruments for which we do not have sufficient corroborating market evidence,
such as binding broker quotes, to support classifying the asset or liability as Level 2. Level 3
also includes complex structured transactions that sometimes require the use of non-standard
models.
Certain OTC derivatives that trade in less liquid markets or contain limited observable model
inputs are currently included in Level 3. We include these assets and liabilities in Level 3 as
required by current interpretations of SFAS 157. As of December 31, 2008, our Level 3 assets and
liabilities consisted entirely of OTC commodity put and call options.
Financial assets and liabilities that are categorized in Level 3 may later be reclassified to
the Level 2 category at the point we are able to obtain sufficient binding market data or the
interpretation of Level 2 criteria is modified in practice to include non-binding market
corroborated data.
As mentioned in Note 7, our wholly owned subsidiary BreitBurn Management provides us with
general management services, including risk management activities. Pursuant to a transition
services agreement that terminated on December 31, 2008, BreitBurn Management contracted with
Provident for the risk management services provided to us.
Providents risk management group calculated the fair values of our commodity swaps using risk
management software that marks to market monthly fixed price delivery swap volumes using forward
commodity price curves and market interest rates. This pricing approach is commonly used by market
participants to value commodity swap contracts for sale to the market. Inputs are obtained from
third party data providers and are verified to published data where available (e.g., NYMEX).
Fair value measurements for our interest rate swaps were also provided by Provident. Monthly
outstanding notional amounts are marked to market for each specific swap using forward interest
rate curves. This pricing approach is commonly used by market participants to value interest rate
swap contracts for sale to the market. Inputs are obtained from third party data providers and are
verified to published data where available (e.g., LIBOR).
Providents risk management group used industry standard option pricing models contained in
their risk management software to calculate the fair values associated with our commodity options.
Inputs to the option pricing models included fixed monthly commodity strike prices and volumes from
each specific contract, commodity prices from commodity forward price curves, volatility and
interest rate factors and time to expiry. Model inputs were obtained from third party data
providers and are verified to published data where available (e.g., NYMEX).
We reviewed the fair value calculations for our derivative instruments that we received from
Providents risk management group on a monthly basis. We also compared these fair value amounts to
the fair value amounts that we receive from the counterparties to our derivative instruments. We
investigated differences and resolved and recorded any required changes prior to the issuance of
our financial statements.
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis are presented in
the table below. Our assessment of the significance of an input to its fair value measurement
requires judgment and can affect the valuation of the assets and liabilities as well as the
category within which they are categorized.
Recurring fair value measurements were:
As of December 31, 2008
Thousands of dollars
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets (Liabilities):
Commodity Derivatives (swaps, put and call options)
$
$
139,074
$
153,218
$
292,292
Other Derivatives (interest rate swaps)
(17,315
)
(17,315
)
Total
$
$
121,759
$
153,218
$
274,977
71
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our derivative instruments classified as
Level 3:
Year Ended
Thousands of dollars
December 31, 2008
Assets (Liabilities):
Beginning balance
$
44,236
Realized and unrealized gains, net
106,154
Purchases and issuances
7,452
Settlements
(4,624
)
Balance at December 31, 2008
$
153,218
Following the termination of the Lehman Brothers interest rate swap and crude oil zero cost
collar, we entered into similar contracts with other counterparties. Our net cost to replicate the
terminated Lehman contracts was $4.2 million and we have recorded a provision related to the
contract default in 2008. We have a claim of approximately $4.6 million in the Lehman bankruptcy
case relating to the terminations.
Unrealized gains of $112.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 related to our
derivative instruments classified as Level 3 are included in gains on commodity derivative
instruments, net on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized losses of $6.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 related to our derivative instruments classified as Level 3 are
also included in gains on commodity derivative instruments, net on the consolidated
statements of operations. Determination of fair values incorporates various factors as required by
SFAS No. 157 including but not limited to the credit standing of the counterparties, the impact of
guarantees as well as our own abilities to perform on our liabilities.
15. Unit and Other Valuation-Based Compensation Plans
BreitBurn Management operates our assets and performs other administrative services for us
such as accounting, corporate development, finance, land administration, legal and engineering.
All of our employees, including our executives, are employees of BreitBurn Management. On June 17,
2008, in connection with the Purchase, Contribution and Partnership Transactions, BreitBurn
Management became our wholly owned subsidiary and entered into an Amended and Restated
Administrative Services Agreement with BEC, pursuant to which BreitBurn Management agreed to
continue to provide administrative services to BEC, in exchange for a monthly fee of $775,000 for
indirect expenses. In addition to the monthly fee, BreitBurn Management agreed to continue to
charge BEC for direct expenses including incentive plan costs and direct payroll and administrative
costs. Beginning on June 17, 2008, all of BMCs costs that were not charged to BEC are
consolidated with our results.
Prior to June 17, 2008, BreitBurn Management provided services to us and to BEC, and allocated
its expenses between the two entities. We were managed by our General Partner, the executive
officers of which were and are employees of BreitBurn Management. We had entered into an
Administrative Services Agreement with BreitBurn Management. Under the Administrative Services
Agreement, we reimbursed BreitBurn Management for all direct and indirect expenses it incurred in
connection with the services it performed on our behalf (including salary, bonus, certain incentive
compensation and other amounts paid to executive officers and other employees).
Effective on the initial public offering date of October 10, 2006, BreitBurn Management
adopted the existing Long-Term Incentive Plan (BreitBurn Management LTIP) and the Unit Appreciation
Rights Plan (UAR plan) of the predecessor as previously amended. The predecessors Executive
Phantom Option Plan, Unit Appreciation Plan for Officers and Key Individuals (Founders Plan), and
the Performance Trust Units awarded to the Chief Financial Officer during 2006 under the BreitBurn
Management LTIP, were adopted by BreitBurn Management with amendments at the initial public
offering date as described in the subject plan discussions below.
We may terminate or amend the long-term incentive plan at any time with respect to any units
for which a grant has not yet been made. We also have the right to alter or amend the long-term
incentive plan or any part of the plan from time to time, including increasing the number of units
that may be granted subject to the requirements of the exchange upon which the Common Units are
listed at that time. However, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that would materially
reduce the rights or benefits of the participant without the consent of the participant. The plan
will expire when units are no longer available under the plan for grants or, if earlier, its
termination by us.
72
Unit Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, our predecessor adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payments , using the modified-prospective transition method.
BreitBurn Management as successor is following the same method as BEC, our predecessor.
Unit based compensation awards granted prior to but not yet vested as of January 1,
2006 that are classified as liabilities were charged to compensation expense based on the fair
value provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). For the liability-based plans, we
recognize these compensation expenses on a graded-vesting method. Under the graded-vesting method,
a company recognizes compensation expense over the requisite service period for each separately
vesting tranche of the award as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards. For our RPU
and CPU equity-based plans, we recognize our compensation expense on a straight line basis over the
annual vesting periods as prescribed in the award agreements.
Awards classified as liabilities are revalued at each reporting period using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model and changes in the fair value of the options are recognized as compensation
expense over the vesting schedules of the awards. Awards classified as equity are valued on the
grant date and are recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period(s). Option awards
outstanding at the end of 2008 are liability-classified because the awards are settled in cash or
have the option of being settled in cash or units at the choice of the holder, and they are indexed
to either our Common Units or to Provident Trust Units. The liability-classified option awards are
distribution-protected awards through either an Adjustment Ratio as defined in the plan or the
holders receive cumulative distribution amounts upon vesting equal to the actual distribution
amounts per Common Unit of the underlying notional Units. In the Black-Scholes option pricing
model, the expected volatilities are based primarily on the historical volatility of Providents
units for Provident indexed units and the Alerian MLP Index for Partnership indexed units. We and
our predecessor use historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within
the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior
are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is based on
historical exercise behavior and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to
be outstanding. The risk free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based
on U.S. Treasury rates. Due to the distribution protection provision of the plans, zero
distribution yield is assumed in the pricing model; however, compensation cost is recognized based
on the units adjusted for the Adjustment Ratio and for certain plans, it includes distribution
amounts accumulated to the reporting date.
73
Founders Plan
Under the Founders Plan, participants received unit appreciation rights which provide cash
compensation in relation to the appreciation in the value of a specified number of underlying
notional phantom units. The value of the unit appreciation rights was determined on the basis of a
valuation of the predecessor at the end of the fiscal period plus distributions during the period
less the value of the predecessor at the beginning of the period. The base price and vesting terms
were determined by BreitBurn Management at the time of the grant. Outstanding unit appreciation
rights vest in the following manner: one-third vest three years after the grant date, one-third
vest four years after the grant date and one-third vest five years after the grant date and are
subject to specified service requirements.
Effective on the initial public offering date of October 10, 2006, all outstanding unit
appreciation rights under the Founders Plan were adopted by BreitBurn Management and converted into
three separate awards. The first award represented 2.2 million unit appreciation rights at a
weighted average grant price of $0.76 per unit with respect to the operations of the properties
that were not transferred to us. The value of these unit appreciation rights at year-end 2006 was
determined on the basis of an assessment of the valuation of the properties at the original grant
date as compared to an assessment of the valuation of the properties at the end of the fiscal
period plus distributions paid. The second award represented 309,570 unit appreciation rights at a
weighted average grant price of $4.70 per unit with respect to the operations of the properties
that were transferred to us for the period from the original date of grant to the initial public
offering date of October 10, 2006. The value of the unit appreciation rights was determined on the
basis of an assessment of the valuation of the properties at the original grant date as compared to
the valuation of the properties at the end of the fiscal period as determined using the initial
public offering price plus distributions paid.
The third award represented 309,570 Partnership unit appreciation rights at a base price of
$18.50 per unit with respect to the operations of the properties that were transferred to us for
the period beginning on the initial public offering date of October 10, 2006. The award is
liability-classified and is being charged to us as compensation expense over the remaining vesting
schedule. The value of the outstanding Partnership unit appreciation rights is remeasured each
period using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. A market prices of
$7.05 was used in
the model for the period ending December 31, 2008.
Expected volatility ranged from 9 percent to 21 percent and had a
weighted average volatility of 9.8 percent. The average risk free rate used was approximately
3.3 percent. The expected option terms
ranged from one half year to two and one half years.
We
recorded approximately $(0.3) million of compensation expense/(income) under
the plan for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The aggregate value of the vested unit appreciation rights was $0.4 million and
the unvested obligation was zero at December 31, 2008.
The following table summarizes information about Appreciation Rights Units issued under the
Founders Plan:
December
31, 2008
Number of
Weighted
Appreciation
Average
Rights Units
Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of period
214,107
$
18.50
Exercised
(91,463
)
18.50
Outstanding, end of period
122,644
$
18.50
Exercisable, end of period
$
BreitBurn Management LTIP and the Partnership LTIP
In September 2005, certain employees of the predecessor were granted restricted units (RTUs)
and/or performance units (PTUs), both of which entitle the employee to receive cash compensation in
relation to the value of a specified number of underlying notional trust units indexed to Provident
Energy Trust Units. The grants are based on personal performance objectives. This plan replaced
the Unit Appreciation Right Plan for Employees and Consultants for the period after September 2005
and subsequent years. RTUs vest one third at the end of year one, one third at end of year two and
one third at the end of year three after grant. In general, cash payments equal to the value of
the
74
underlying notional units were made on the anniversary dates of the RTU to the employees
entitled to receive them. PTUs vest three years from the end of third year after grant and payout
can range from zero to two hundred percent of the initial grant depending on the total return of
the underlying notional units as compared to the returns of selected peer companies. The total
return of the Provident Energy Trust unit is compared with the return of 25 selected Canadian
trusts and funds. The Provident indexed PTUs granted in 2005 and 2006 entitle employees to receive
cash payments equal to the market price of the underlying notional units. Under our LTIP,
Partnership indexed PTUs were granted in 2007 and are payable in cash or may be paid in Common
Units of the Partnership if elected at least 60 days prior to vesting by the grantees. The total
return of the Partnership unit is compared with the return of 49 companies in the Alerian MLP Index
for the payout multiplier. All of the grants are liability-classified. Underlying notional units
are established based on target salary LTIP threshold for each employee. The awarded notional
units are adjusted cumulatively thereafter for distribution payments through the use of an
adjustment ratio. The estimated fair value associated with RTUs and PTUs is expensed in the
statement of income over the vesting period.
On June 17, 2008, we entered into the BreitBurn Management Purchase agreement with Pro LP and
Pro GP. The BreitBurn Management Purchase Agreement contains certain covenants of the parties
relating to the allocation of responsibility for liabilities and obligations under certain
pre-existing equity-based compensation plans adopted by BreitBurn Management, BEC and us. The
pre-existing compensation plans include the outstanding 2005 and 2006 LTIP grants which are indexed
to the Provident Trust Units. As a result, we paid $0.9 million for our share of the 2005 LTIP
grants that vested in June 2008 in accordance with the agreed allocation of liability.
In September 2008, BreitBurn Management made an offer to holders of the 2006 LTIP grants to
cash out their Provident-indexed units at $10.32 per share before the normal vesting date of
December 31, 2008. By the end of September 2008, the offer was accepted by all employees who had
outstanding 2006 LTIP grants. Consequently, compensation expense was recognized for the full
amount of the remaining unvested liability during 2008. BreitBurn Management paid employees $0.6
million in 2008 for its share of the 2006 LTIP grants in accordance with the agreed allocation of
liability.
Under our LTIP, Partnership-indexed restricted units (RTUs) and/or performance units (PTUs)
were granted in 2007 and are payable in cash or in Common Units of the Partnership if elected by
the grantee at least 60 days prior to the vesting date. For PTUs, a performance multiplier is
applied and is determined by comparing our total return to the returns of 49 companies in the
Alerian MLP Index. All of the grants are liability-classified. Underlying notional units are
established based on target salary LTIP threshold for each employee. The awarded notional units
are adjusted cumulatively thereafter for distribution payments through the use of an adjustment
ratio. The estimated fair value associated with RTUs and PTUs is expensed in the statement of
income over the vesting period.
We
recognized $(0.5) of compensation expense/(income) for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Our share of the aggregate liability under the
BreitBurn Management LTIP was
$0.8 million at December 31, 2008. The aggregate value of the vested and
unvested units under the plan was $0.6 million and
$0.2 million respectively, at December 31, 2008.
The
following table summarizes information at December 31, 2008 about the restricted/performance units granted in
2005 and 2006:
Weighted
Number of
Average
Units
Grant Price
Outstanding, beginning of period
267,702
$
10.77
Granted
Exercised
(267,351
)
10.77
Cancelled
(351
)
10.73
Outstanding, end of period
$
10.77
Exercisable, end of period
$
The
following table summarizes information about the restricted/performance units granted in
2007. A market price of $7.05 was used in the model for the period ending
December 31, 2008. Expected volatility
ranged from 9
75
percent to 15 percent and had a weighted average volatility of 9.8 percent. The average risk free
rate ranged from 2 to 3.3 percent. The expected option terms ranged from one year to two years.
PTUs and RTUs
December
31, 2008
Weighted
Number of
Average
Units
Grant Price
Outstanding, beginning of period
108,717
$
23.64
Granted
Exercised
(20,645
)
20.39
Cancelled
(1,080
)
24.10
Outstanding, end of period
86,992
$
24.10
Exercisable, end of period
$
Unit Appreciation Right Plan
In 2004, the predecessor adopted the Unit Appreciation Right Plan for Employees and
Consultants (the UAR Plan). Under the UAR Plan, certain employees of the predecessor were
granted unit appreciation rights (UARs). The UARs entitle the employee to receive cash
compensation in relation to the value of a specified number of underlying notional trust units of
Provident (Phantom Units). The exercise price and the vesting terms of the UARs were
determined at the sole discretion of the Plan Administrator at the time of the grant. The UAR Plan
was replaced with the BreitBurn Management LTIP at the end of September 2005. The grants issued
prior to the replacement of the UAR Plan fully vested in 2008.
UARs vest one third at the end of year one, one third at the end of year two and one third at
the end of year three after grant. Upon vesting, the employee is entitled to receive a cash
payment equal to the excess of the market price of Provident Energy Trusts units (PVE units) over
the exercise price of the Phantom Units at the grant date, adjusted for an additional amount equal
to any Excess Distributions, as defined in the plan. The predecessor settles rights earned under
the plan in cash.
The total compensation expense for the UAR plan is allocated between us and our predecessor.
Our share of expense was an immaterial amount in 2008 under the UAR Plan. Our share of the aggregate
liability under the UAR Plan was approximately $0.1 million at December 31, 2008. The liability
primarily represents accrued expense related to unpaid distributions on the fully vested UARs. In
the Black-Scholes option pricing model for this plan, the expected volatility used was 29 percent
and the risk rate was 3.3 percent. The expected option term is less than one half year.
The following table summarizes the information about UARs:
BreitBurn Management Company
PVE indexed units
December
31, 2008
Number of
Weighted
Appreciation
Average
Rights
Exercise Price
Outstanding,
beginning of period
154,323
$
9.16
Exercised
(69,994
)
9.18
Cancelled
Outstanding, end of
period
84,329
$
9.96
Exercisable, end of
period
84,329
$
9.96
Director Performance Units
Effective with the initial public offering, we also made grants of Restricted Phantom Units in
the Partnership to the non-employee directors of our General Partner. Each phantom unit is
accompanied by a distribution equivalent unit right entitling the holder to an additional number of
76
phantom units with a value equal to the amount of distributions paid on each of our Common Units
until settlement. Upon vesting, the majority of the phantom units will be paid in Common Units,
except for certain directors awards which will be settled in cash. The unit-settled awards are
classified as equity and the cash-settled awards are classified as liabilities. The estimated fair
value associated with these phantom units is expensed in the statement of income over the vesting
period. The accumulated compensation expense for unit-settled awards is reported in equity and for
cash-settled grants, it is reflected as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet.
We recorded compensation expense for the directors phantom units of
approximately $0.1 million in 2008. Our aggregate liability under the
outstanding grants was $0.8 million at December 31, 2008 of which $0.4 million represents the
unvested portion.
The following table summarizes information about the Director Performance Units:
December
31, 2008
Number of
Weighted
Performance
Average
Units
Grant Price
Outstanding, beginning of period
37,473
$
21.11
Granted
20,146
27.35
Exercised
(22,190
)
23.05
Outstanding, end of period
35,429
$
23.44
Exercisable, end of period
$
Restricted Phantom Units and Convertible Phantom Units
In connection with the changes to BreitBurn Managements executive compensation program, the
board of directors of our General Partner has approved two new types of awards under our LTIP,
namely, Restricted Phantom Units (RPUs) and Convertible Phantom Units (CPUs). In December 2007,
seven executives of our General Partner received 188,545 units of RPUs and 681,500 units of CPUs at
a grant price of $30.29 per Common Unit. Each of the awards has the vesting commencement date of
January 1, 2008. In November 2007, the Co-Chief Executive Officers also received 184,400 of
Restricted Phantom Units (RPUs) at a grant price of $31.68 per Common Unit under our Long-Term
Incentive Plan. Those executive officers received CPU grants because they are in the best position
to influence our operating results and, therefore, the amount of distributions we make to holders
of our Common Units. As discussed below, payments under CPUs are significantly tied to the amount
of distributions we make to holders of our Common Units. As discussed further below, the number of
CPUs ultimately awarded to each of these senior executives is based upon the level of distributions
to common unitholders achieved during the term of the CPUs. The CPU grants vest over a longer-term
period of up to five years. Therefore, these grants will not be made on an annual basis. New
grants could be made at the boards discretion at a future date after the present CPU grants have
vested. A holder of an RPU is entitled to receive payments equal to quarterly distributions in
cash at the time they are made. As a result, we believe that RPUs better incentivize holders of
these awards to grow stable distributions for our common unitholders than do performance units. In
2008, the board of directors of the General Partner granted 245,290 RPUs to employees at a weighted
average price of $20.44.
Restricted Phantom Units (RPUs). RPUs are phantom equity awards that, to the extent vested,
represent the right to receive actual partnership units upon specified payment events. RPUs
generally vest in three equal, annual installments on each anniversary of the vesting commencement
date of the award. In addition, each RPU is granted in tandem with a distribution equivalent right
that will remain outstanding from the grant of the RPU until the earlier to occur of its forfeiture
or the payment of the underlying unit, and which entitles the grantee to receive payment of amounts
equal to distributions paid to each holder of an actual partnership unit during such period. RPUs
that do not vest for any reason are forfeited upon a grantees termination of employment.
Convertible Phantom Units (CPUs). CPUs vest on the earliest to occur of (i) January 1, 2013,
(ii) the date on which the aggregate amount of distributions paid to common unitholders for any
four consecutive quarters during the term of the award is greater than or equal to $3.10 per Common
Unit and (iii) upon the occurrence of the death or disability of the grantee or his or her
termination without cause or for good reason (as defined in the holders employment agreement,
if applicable). Unvested CPUs are forfeited in the event that the grantee ceases to remain in the
service of BreitBurn Management.
Prior to vesting, a holder of a CPU is entitled to receive payments equal to the amount of
distributions made by us with respect to each of the Common Units multiplied by the number of
Common Unit equivalents underlying the CPUs at the time of the distribution. Initially, one Common
Unit equivalent underlies each CPU at the time it was awarded to the grantee. However, the number
of Common Unit equivalents underlying the CPUs increase at a compounded rate of 25 percent upon the
achievement of each 5 percent compounded increase in the distributions paid by us to our common
unitholders. Conversely, the number of Common Unit equivalents underlying the CPUs decrease at a
compounded rate of 25 percent if the distributions paid by us to our common unitholders decreases
at a compounded rate of 5 percent.
77
In the event that the CPUs vest on January 1, 2013 or because the aggregate amount of
distributions paid to common unitholders for any four consecutive quarters during the term of the
award is greater than $3.10 per Common Unit, the CPUs would convert into a number of Common Units
equal to the number of Common Unit equivalents underlying the CPUs at such time (calculated based
upon the aggregate amount of distributions made per Common Unit for the preceding four quarters).
In the event that CPUs vest due to the death or disability of the grantee or his or her
termination without cause or good reason, the CPUs would convert into a number of Common Units
equal to the number of Common Unit equivalents underlying the CPUs at such time, pro-rated based on
when the death or disability occurred. First, the number of Common Unit equivalents would be
calculated based upon the aggregate amount of distributions made per Common Unit for the preceding
four quarters or, if such calculation would provide for a greater number of Common Unit
equivalents, the most recently announced quarterly distribution level by us on an annualized basis.
Then, this number would be pro rated by multiplying it by a percentage equal to:
if such termination occurs on or before December 31, 2008, a percentage equal to 40 percent;
if such termination occurs on or before December 31, 2009, a percentage equal to 60 percent;
if such termination occurs on or before December 31, 2010, a percentage equal to 80 percent; and
if such termination occurs on or after January 1, 2011, a percentage equal to 100 percent.
In 2008, we recognized compensation expense of $7.5 million related to its CPUs and RPUs.
The
following table summarizes information about the CPUs and RPUs for
the year ended December 31, 2008:
Number of
Weighted
RPU
Average
Units
Grant Price
Outstanding, beginning of period (a)
372,945
$
30.98
Granted
245,290
20.44
Cancelled
(10,972
)
20.83
Outstanding, end of period
607,263
$
26.91
Exercisable, end of period
$
16. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Rental Obligations
We had operating leases for office space and other property and equipment having initial or
remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year. Our future minimum rental payments for
operating leases at December 31, 2008 are presented below:
Payments Due by Year
Thousands of dollars
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
after 2013
Total
Operating leases
$
2,232
$
2,126
$
1,989
$
1,656
$
1,272
$
2,143
$
11,418
BreitBurn Management, our wholly owned subsidiary, has office, vehicle (primarily work
vehicles used in our field operations) and office equipment leases. Net rental payments made under
non-cancelable operating leases were $2.88 million in 2008.
Surety Bonds and Letters of Credit
In the normal course of business, we have performance obligations that are secured, in whole
or in part, by surety bonds or letters of credit. These obligations primarily cover self-insurance
and other programs where governmental organizations require such support. These surety bonds and
letters of credit are issued by financial institutions and are required to be reimbursed by us if
drawn upon. At December 31, 2008, we had $10.1 million in surety bonds and we had $0.3 million in
letters of credit outstanding.
78
Other
On October 31, 2008, Quicksilver, an owner of more than five percent of our Common Units,
instituted a lawsuit in the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas naming us as a defendant along
with BreitBurn GP, BOLP, BOGP, Randall H. Breitenbach, Halbert S. Washburn, Gregory J. Moroney,
Charles S. Weiss, Randall J. Findlay, Thomas W. Buchanan, Grant D. Billing and Provident. On
December 12, 2008, Quicksilver filed an Amended Petition and asserted twelve different counts
against the various defendants. The primary claims are as follows: Quicksilver alleges that BOLP
breached the Contribution Agreement with Quicksilver, dated September 11, 2007, based on
allegations that we made false and misleading statements relating to its relationship with
Provident. Quicksilver also alleges common law and statutory fraud claims against all of the
defendants by contending that the defendants made false and misleading statements to induce
Quicksilver to acquire Common Units in us. Finally, Quicksilver alleges claims for breach of the
Partnerships First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated as of October 10,
2006 (Partnership Agreement), and other common law claims relating to certain transactions and an
amendment to the Partnership Agreement that occurred in June 2008. Quicksilver seeks a temporary
and permanent injunction, a declaratory judgment relating primarily to the interpretation of the
Partnership Agreement and the voting rights in that agreement, indemnification, punitive or
exemplary damages, avoidance of BreitBurn GPs assignment to us of all of its economic interest in
us, attorneys fees and costs, pre- and post-judgment interest, and monetary damages. The parties
to the lawsuit are engaged in discovery pursuant to an agreed scheduling order. On February 17,
2009, we filed a motion for summary judgment which is scheduled to be heard on March 26, 2009. A
hearing on Quicksilvers request for a temporary injunction is scheduled for April 6, 2009.
We are defending ourselves vigorously in connection with the allegations in the lawsuit.
Because this lawsuit still is at an early stage, we cannot predict the manner and timing of the
resolution of the lawsuit or its outcome, or estimate a range of possible losses, if any, that
could result in the event of an adverse verdict in the lawsuit.
Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation and claims arising out of our
operations in the normal course of business, we are not currently a party to any material legal
proceedings other than as mentioned above. In addition, we are not aware of any material legal or
governmental proceedings against us, or contemplated to be brought against us, under the various
environmental protection statues to which we are subject.
79
17. Retirement Plan
BreitBurn Management operates our assets and performs other administrative services for us
such as accounting, corporate development, finance, land administration, legal and engineering. All
of our employees, including our executives, are employees of BreitBurn Management. BreitBurn
Management has a defined contribution retirement plan, which covers substantially all of its
employees who have completed at least three months of service. The plan provides for BreitBurn
Management to make regular contributions based on employee contributions as provided for in the
plan agreement. Employees fully vest in BreitBurn Managements contributions after five years of
service. BEC is charged for a portion of the matching contributions made by BreitBurn Management.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the matching contribution paid by us was
$0.4 million.
18. Significant Customers
We sell oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids primarily to large domestic refiners. For
the year ended December 31, 2008, our purchasers which accounted for 10 percent or more of net
sales were ConocoPhillips which accounted for 25 percent of net sales and Marathon Oil Company
which accounted for 13 percent of net sales.
19. Minority Interest
On May 25, 2007, BOLP entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with TIFD X-III LLC (TIFD),
pursuant to which it acquired TIFDs 99 percent limited partner interest in BreitBurn Energy
Partners I, L.P. (BEPI) for a total purchase price of approximately $82 million (the BEPI
Acquisition). As such, we are fully consolidating the results of BEPI and thus
are recognizing a minority interest liability representing the book value of the general partners
interests. At December 31, 2008, the amount of this minority interest liability was $0.5 million.
The general partner of BEPI holds a 35 percent reversionary interest under the existing limited
partnership agreement applicable to the properties. Based on year end price and cost projections,
the reversionary interest payout is not expected to occur.
20. Subsequent Events
On January 22, 2009, we terminated a portion of our 2011 and 2012 crude oil swaps (1,939
Bbls/d at $90.00 per Bbl) and replaced them with new contracts with the same counterparty for the
same volumes at market prices ($63.30 per Bbl). We realized $32.3 million from this termination.
On January 26, 2009, we terminated a portion of our 2011 and 2012 natural gas swaps and replaced
them with new contracts with the same counterparty for the same volumes at market prices. We
realized $13.3 million from this termination. Proceeds from these contracts were used to pay down
debt.
On February 13, 2009, we paid a cash distribution of approximately $27.4 million to our common
unitholders of record as of the close of business on February 9, 2009. The distribution that was
paid to unitholders was $0.52 per Common Unit. In February 2009 we also made payments equivalent
to the distribution made to unitholders of $0.7 million on Restricted Phantom Units and Convertible
Phantom Units issued under our Long-Term Incentive Plans.
On February 19, 2009, 134,377 Common Units were issued to employees under our 2006 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, increasing our outstanding Common Units to 52,770,011. See Note 15 for information
regarding our unit based compensation plans.
21. Oil and Natural Gas Activities (Unaudited)
Costs incurred
Our oil and natural gas activities are conducted in the United States. The following table
summarizes the costs incurred by us for the year ended December 31,
2008:
Thousands of dollars
Property acquisition costs
Proved
$
Unproved
Development costs
129,503
Asset retirement costs
1,363
Pipelines and processing
facilities
Total
$
130,866
80
Capitalized costs
The following table presents the aggregate capitalized costs subject to depreciation,
depletion and amortization relating to oil and gas activities, and the aggregate related
accumulated allowance for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Thousands of dollars
Proved properties and related producing assets
$
1,734,932
Pipelines and processing facilities
112,726
Unproved properties
209,873
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
(223,575
)
$
1,833,956
The average DD&A rate per equivalent unit of production for the year ended December 31, 2008
was $26.42 per Boe.
Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities
The results of operations from oil and gas producing activities below exclude non-oil and gas
revenues and expenses, general and administrative expenses, interest expenses and interest income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Thousands of dollars
Oil, natural gas and NGL sales
$
467,381
Realized loss on derivative instruments
(55,946
)
Unrealized gain on derivative
instruments
388,048
Operating costs
(149,681
)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
(178,657
)
Pre-tax Income
471,145
Income tax expense
1,939
Results of producing operations
$
469,206
Supplemental reserve information
The following information summarizes our estimated proved reserves of oil (including
condensate and natural gas liquids) and natural gas and the present values thereof for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The following reserve information is based upon reports by Netherland, Sewell &
Associates, Inc. and Schlumberger Data & Consulting Services, independent petroleum engineering
firms. The estimates are prepared in accordance with SEC regulations.
Management believes the reserve estimates presented herein, in accordance with generally
accepted engineering and evaluation principles consistently applied, are reasonable. However,
there are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and values of the estimated
proved reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development
expenditures, including many factors beyond our control. Reserve engineering is a subjective
process of estimating the recovery from underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be
measured in an exact manner and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality
of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Because all
reserve estimates are to some degree speculative, the quantities of oil and gas that are
81
ultimately
recovered, production and operating costs, the amount and timing of future development expenditures
and future oil and gas sales prices may all differ from those assumed in these estimates. In
addition, different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserve quantities and cash
flows based upon the same available data. Therefore, the standardized measure of discounted net
future cash flows shown below represents estimates only and should not be construed as the current
market value of the estimated oil and gas reserves attributable to our properties. In this regard,
the information set forth in the following tables includes revisions of reserve estimates
attributable to proved properties included in the preceding years estimates. Such revisions
reflect additional information from subsequent exploitation and development activities, production
history of the properties involved and any adjustments in the projected economic life of such
properties resulting from changes in product prices. Decreases in the prices of oil and natural gas and increases in operating expenses have had, and
could have in the future, an adverse effect on the carrying value of our proved reserves and
revenues, profitability and cash flow.
The following table sets forth certain data pertaining to our estimated proved and proved
developed reserves for the year ended December 31, 2008.