Annual Reports

  • 10-K (Nov 10, 2014)
  • 10-K (Feb 28, 2014)
  • 10-K (Feb 26, 2013)
  • 10-K (Feb 23, 2011)
  • 10-K (Feb 24, 2010)
  • 10-K (Feb 27, 2009)

 
Quarterly Reports

 
8-K

 
Other

Rayonier Inc. REIT 10-K 2010
Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

    

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

OR

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

    

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 1-6780

RAYONIER INC.

Incorporated in the State of North Carolina

I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 13-2607329

50 NORTH LAURA STREET,

JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202

(Principal Executive Office)

Telephone Number: (904) 357-9100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act,

all of which are registered on the New York Stock Exchange:

Common Shares

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YES x        NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.        YES ¨        NO  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

        YES x        NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

        YES ¨        NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  x

   Accelerated filer  ¨

Non-accelerated filer  ¨

   Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

        YES ¨        NO  x

The aggregate market value of the Common Shares of the registrant held by non-affiliates at the close of business on June 30, 2009 was $2,848,218,208 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

As of February 19, 2010, there were outstanding 79,909,191 Common Shares of the registrant.

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the 2010 annual meeting of the shareholders of the registrant scheduled to be held May 20, 2010, are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.

 

 


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item

      

Page

  PART I  

1.

 

Business

  1

1A.

 

Risk Factors

  6

1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  13

2.

 

Properties

  14

3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  14

4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  15
  PART II  

5.

 

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  16

6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  18

7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  21

7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

  36

8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  37

9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  37

9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  37

9B.

 

Other Information

  37
  PART III  

10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  38

11.

 

Executive Compensation

  38

12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  38

13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  38

14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  38
  PART IV  

15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  39

 

i


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

     Page

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

   F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-2

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three Years Ended December  31, 2009

   F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008

   F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2009

   F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-7
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES   

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

   F-46

All other financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, the required matter is not present, or the required information has been otherwise supplied in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

  

Signatures

   F-47

Exhibit Index

  

 

ii


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

PART I

When we refer to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or “Rayonier,” we mean Rayonier Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References herein to “Notes to Financial Statements” refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Rayonier Inc. included in Item 8 of this Report.

 

Item 1. BUSINESS

General

We are a leading international forest products company primarily engaged in activities associated with timberland management, the sale and entitlement of real estate, and the production and sale of high value specialty cellulose fibers and fluff pulp. We own, lease or manage approximately 2.5 million acres of timberland and real estate located in the United States and New Zealand. We believe that Rayonier is the seventh largest private timberland owner in the U.S. Included in this property is approximately 0.2 million acres of high value real estate located primarily along the coastal corridor from Savannah, Georgia to Daytona Beach, Florida. We own and operate two specialty cellulose mills in the United States. In addition, we manufacture lumber in three sawmills in Georgia and engage in the trading of logs. For information on sales, operating income and identifiable assets by reportable segment, see Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 4 — Segment and Geographical Information.

Our corporate strategy is to:

 

   

Increase the size and quality of our timberland holdings through cash-accretive timberland acquisitions while selling timberland that no longer meets our strategic or financial return requirements.

 

   

Extract maximum value from our higher and better use (“HBU”) properties. We pursue entitlement activity on development property while maintaining a rural HBU program of sales for conservation, recreation and industrial uses.

 

   

Differentiate our Performance Fibers business by developing and improving customer specific applications. We emphasize operational excellence to ensure quality, reliability and efficiency.

We originated as the Rainier Pulp & Paper Company founded in Shelton, WA in 1926. In 1937, we became “Rayonier Incorporated,” a public company traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), until 1968 when we became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ITT Corporation (“ITT”). On February 28, 1994, Rayonier again became an independent public company after ITT distributed all of Rayonier’s Common Shares to ITT stockholders. Our shares are publicly traded on the NYSE under the symbol RYN. We are a North Carolina corporation with executive offices located at 50 North Laura Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202. Our telephone number is (904) 357-9100.

The Company is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Under this structure, we are generally not required to pay federal income taxes on our earnings from timber harvest operations and other REIT-qualifying activities contingent upon meeting applicable distribution, income, asset, shareholder and other tests.

Our principal businesses are conducted through two entities. Our U.S. timber operations are primarily conducted by a wholly-owned REIT subsidiary, Rayonier Forest Resources, L.P. Our non REIT-qualifying operations, which are subject to corporate-level tax, are held by our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, Rayonier TRS Holdings Inc. (“TRS”). These operations include our Performance Fibers, Wood Products and trading businesses, as well as the sale and entitlement of HBU properties.

Timber

Our Timber segment owns, leases or manages approximately 2.4 million acres of timberlands, and sells standing timber (primarily at auction to third parties) and delivered logs. We also generate non-timber income from other land related activities. See chart in Item 2 — Properties for additional information.

Our Eastern U.S. timberland holdings consist of approximately 1.7 million acres in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, New York, Oklahoma and Texas. End-use markets for this timber include pulp, paper and wood products facilities. The predominant tree species across these timberlands are loblolly and slash pine. Hardwoods include red oak, sweet gum, black gum, red maple, cypress, black cherry, sugar maple and yellow birch.

 

1


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Our Western U.S. timberlands consist of approximately 0.4 million acres of primarily softwood second and third growth timber in western Washington with approximately 52 percent hemlock, 35 percent Douglas-fir and the remainder western red cedar, spruce and red alder.

In addition at December 31, 2009, we had a 40 percent interest in a New Zealand joint venture (“JV”) which owns or leases approximately 0.3 million acres of primarily radiata pine timberland, which we manage. In February 2010, Phaunos Timber Fund (“Phaunos”) invested NZ$167 million to acquire a 35 percent interest in the JV which reduced our ownership interest to 26 percent. Phaunos’ investment was used entirely to reduce the JV’s debt. We will continue to manage the JV.

We manage our U.S. timberlands in accordance with the requirements of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative® (“SFI”) program, a comprehensive system of environmental principles, objectives and performance measures that combines the perpetual growing and harvesting of trees with the protection of wildlife, plants, soil and water quality. Through application of our site-specific silvicultural expertise and financial discipline, we manage timber in a way that optimizes site preparation, tree species selection, competition control, use of fertilization and timing of thinning and final harvest. We also have a genetic tree improvement program aimed to enhance the productivity and quality of our timber. In addition, non-timber income opportunities associated with our timberlands such as recreational licenses and specialty forest products, as well as considerations for the future higher and better uses of the land, are integral parts of our site-specific management philosophy. All these activities are designed to maximize value while complying with SFI requirements.

Our Eastern U.S. timber is primarily a mix of sawtimber and pulpwood. The average rotation (harvest) age for timber from the Eastern U.S. (primarily Southern pine), excluding New York, is between 21 and 24 years. Due to slower timber growth rates, the harvest age on the New York timberlands (primarily specialty hardwoods) ranges widely from 40 to 80 years. Rotation age for timber from the Western U.S. ranges from 40 to 50 years, and is primarily composed of sawtimber.

Softwood merchantable timber inventory is an estimate of timber volume based on the earliest economically harvestable age. Hardwood inventory is an estimate of timber volume available for harvest. Estimates are based on an inventory system that involves periodic statistical sampling. Adjustments are made on the basis of growth estimates, harvest information, environmental restrictions and market conditions. Timber located in swamplands, restricted or environmentally sensitive areas is not included in the merchantable inventory shown below.

The following table sets forth the estimated volumes of merchantable timber in the U.S. by location and type, as of December 31, 2009:

 

Location

   Softwood    Hardwood    Total    Equivalent total,
in thousands of
short green tons
   %

Eastern, in thousands of short green tons

   31,094    21,067    52,161    52,161    84

Western, in millions of board feet

   1,279    81    1,360    9,791    16
                  
            61,952    100
                  

Real Estate

Our Real Estate subsidiary owns approximately 0.1 million acres of land. We segregate our real estate holdings into three groups: HBU development, HBU rural and non-strategic timberlands. Development properties are predominantly located in the 11 coastal counties between Savannah, Georgia and Daytona Beach, Florida. Our strategy is to pursue and obtain entitlements for selected development properties, to sell rural properties at a premium to timberland values and to divest non-strategic timberland holdings that do not meet our investment criteria.

Performance Fibers

We are a leading manufacturer of high value specialty cellulose fibers and absorbent materials with production facilities in Jesup, Georgia and Fernandina Beach, Florida, which have a combined annual capacity of approximately 740,000 metric tons. These facilities manufacture more than 25 different grades of fibers. The Jesup facility can produce approximately 590,000 metric tons, or 80 percent of our total capacity, and the Fernandina Beach facility can produce approximately 150,000 metric tons, or 20 percent of our total capacity. This segment has two major product lines:

Cellulose specialties — We are a leading producer of specialty cellulose products, most of which are used in dissolving chemical applications that require a highly purified form to produce cellulose acetate and ethers that create

 

2


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

high value, technologically demanding products. Our products are used in a wide variety of end uses such as: cigarette filters, liquid crystal display screens, acetate textile fibers, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, rigid packaging, photographic film, impact-resistant plastics, high-tenacity rayon yarn for tires and industrial hoses, detergents, food casings, food products, thickeners for oil well-drilling muds, lacquers, paints, printing inks, and explosives. In addition, cellulose specialties include high value specialty paper applications used for decorative laminates, automotive air and oil filters, shoe innersoles, battery separators, circuit boards and filter media for the food industry.

Absorbent materials — We are a producer of fibers for absorbent hygiene products. These fibers are typically referred to as fluff fibers and are used as an absorbent medium in products such as disposable baby diapers, feminine hygiene products, incontinence pads, convalescent bed pads, industrial towels and wipes, and non-woven fabrics.

Approximately 61 percent of Performance Fibers sales are exported, primarily to customers in Asia and Europe. Approximately 95 percent of Performance Fibers sales are made directly by Rayonier personnel, with the remainder through independent sales agents. We have long-term contracts with the world’s largest manufacturers of acetate-based products and other key customers that extend into 2011 and represent nearly all of our high value cellulose specialties production.

Wood Products

Our Wood Products business segment manufactures and sells dimension lumber. We operate three lumber manufacturing facilities in the U.S. that produce Southern pine lumber, which is generally used for residential and industrial construction. Located in Baxley, Swainsboro and Eatonton, Georgia, the mills have a combined annual capacity of approximately 370 million board feet of lumber and 700,000 short green tons of wood chips. In 2009, we continued to operate at reduced production levels due to decreased demand from a weak housing market and expect to operate at reduced production levels in 2010 unless market conditions improve.

Lumber sales are primarily made by Rayonier personnel to customers in the southeastern U.S. Approximately 80 percent of our lumber mills’ wood chip production is sold at market prices to our Jesup, Georgia performance fibers facility. In 2009, these purchases represented approximately 11 percent of that facility’s total wood consumption.

Other

The primary business of our Other segment is trading logs.

Discontinued Operations and Dispositions

Included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are environmental liabilities relating to prior dispositions and discontinued operations, which includes our Port Angeles, WA performance fibers mill that was closed in 1997; our wholly-owned subsidiary, Southern Wood Piedmont Company (“SWP”), which ceased operations other than environmental investigation and remediation activities in 1989; our Eastern Research Division, which ceased operations in 1981; and other miscellaneous assets held for disposition. See Note 16 — Liabilities for Dispositions and Discontinued Operations for additional information.

Foreign Sales and Operations

Sales from non-U.S. operations comprised approximately three percent of consolidated 2009 sales. See Note 4 — Segment and Geographical Information for additional information.

Intellectual Property

We own numerous patents, trademarks and trade secrets, and have developed significant know-how, particularly relating to our Performance Fibers business. We intend to continue to take such steps as are necessary to protect our intellectual property, including filing patent applications for inventions that are deemed important to our business operations. Our U.S. patents generally have a duration of 20 years from the date of filing.

 

3


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Competition

Our U.S. timberlands are located in three major timber-growing areas (the northwest U.S., known as our Western region and the northeast and the southern U.S., known as our Eastern region), where timber markets are fragmented. In the Western region, Weyerhaeuser, Hancock Timber Resource Group, Green Diamond Resource Company, Longview Timber, The Campbell Group, Port Blakely Tree Farms, Pope Resources and the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources are significant competitors. Other competition in the Western region arises from log imports from Canada. In the Eastern region, we compete with Plum Creek Timber Company, Timberland Investment Management Organizations such as Hancock Timber Resource Group, Resource Management Services, Forest Investment Associates and The Campbell Group, and other numerous large and small privately held timber companies. In all markets, price is the principal method of competition.

In Performance Fibers, we market high purity, specialty cellulose fibers worldwide against competition from domestic and foreign producers. Major competitors include Buckeye Technologies, Borregaard, Neucel, Sappi Saiccor and Sateri International. Product performance, technical service and price are principal methods of competition. Sappi Saiccor, which expanded its cellulose specialty pulp mill in South Africa, and Sateri International, which completed an expansion of its pulp mill in Bahia, Brazil in 2008, began providing limited quantities of acetate primarily for testing and qualification purposes to customers during 2009. The new market capacity is not expected to adversely affect the results of our Performance Fibers segment in 2010. However, it is difficult to determine how market dynamics may impact our business in 2011 and beyond.

Additionally, in Performance Fibers we market absorbent materials against competition from domestic and foreign producers. Major competitors include Weyerhaeuser, GP Cellulose and International Paper. Price and customer service are the principal methods of competition.

Our Wood Products business competes with a number of lumber producers throughout the U.S. and Canada, but particularly with sawmills throughout Georgia and Florida. Our Wood Products business represents a de minimus amount of North American capacity.

Customers

In 2009, a group of customers under the common control of Eastman Chemical Company (and its affiliates), Celanese and Nantong Cellulose represented approximately 18, 17 and 16 percent of our Performance Fibers segment’s sales, respectively, and 13, 12 and 11 percent of consolidated sales, respectively. The loss of any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company and the Performance Fibers segment’s results of operations.

Seasonality

Our Western region’s timber sales are generally lower in the third quarter due to greater availability of non-Rayonier timber during the drier summer harvesting period. Our Wood Products segment may experience higher seasonal demand in the second and third quarters when demand for new housing has typically increased. Our Performance Fibers and Real Estate segments’ results are normally not impacted by seasonal changes.

Environmental Matters

See Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Environmental Regulation, Note 16 — Liabilities for Dispositions and Discontinued Operations, and Item 3 — Legal Proceedings.

Raw Materials

The manufacturing of our performance fibers products and lumber requires significant amounts of wood. Timber harvesting can be restricted by stringent regulatory requirements, adverse weather conditions and legal challenges from various environmental groups. The supply of timber is directly affected by price and demand fluctuations in wood products, pulp and paper markets and by weather.

 

4


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Our Performance Fibers and lumber mills obtain their logs primarily through open market purchases made by our wood procurement organization, which negotiates prices and volumes with independent third party suppliers who deliver to our facilities. A limited amount of Performance Fibers log purchases are made directly from the Timber segment at prevailing market prices.

Performance Fibers manufacturing uses a substantial amount of residual biomass to produce its own energy, but also requires significant amounts of fuel oil and natural gas. These raw materials are subject to significant changes in prices and availability. To reduce cost, we completed a number of capital projects to reduce fossil fuel consumption, including a power boiler replacement at our Fernandina Beach, Florida facility, which now consumes primarily wood waste. We continually pursue reductions in usage and costs of other key raw materials, supplies and contract services at our Performance Fibers and lumber mills and do not foresee any material constraints in the near term from pricing or availability.

Research and Development

The research and development efforts of our Performance Fibers business are primarily directed at further developing existing core products and technologies, improving the quality of cellulose fiber grades, absorbent materials and related products, improving manufacturing efficiency and environmental controls, and reducing fossil fuel consumption.

The research and development activities of our timber operations include genetic tree improvement and applied silvicultural programs to identify management practices that will improve financial returns from our timberlands.

Employee Relations

We currently employ approximately 1,800 people, of whom approximately 1,700 are in the United States. Approximately 900 of our hourly Performance Fibers employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. The majority of our hourly employees are represented by one of several labor unions. We believe relations with our employees are satisfactory.

Sustainable Forestry

While it is our objective to maximize future wood supply through forest management programs that increase timberland productivity, we have a longstanding commitment to meet the highest levels of forest stewardship and to promote sustainable forestry practices throughout the industry. Most of our U.S. timberlands and wood procurement practices have been audited and certified by an independent third party under the SFI program. We have over 2 million acres enrolled in the SFI program. This independent certification verifies that we meet strict requirements for growing and harvesting trees in an environmentally responsible manner that protects natural resources, renews forests, ensures sustainable harvest levels, creates biological diversity, and enhances wildlife protection.

Availability of Reports and Other Information

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are made available to the public free of charge in the Investor Relations section of our Web site www.rayonier.com, shortly after we electronically file such material with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our corporate governance guidelines and charters of all Committees of our Board of Directors are also available on our Web site.

 

5


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Certain statements in this document regarding anticipated financial outcomes including earnings guidance, if any, business and market conditions, outlook and other similar statements relating to Rayonier’s future financial and operational performance, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “estimate,” “believe,” “anticipate” and other similar language. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on these statements. The following risk factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements that are made in this document.

Forward-looking statements are only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no duty to update its forward- looking statements except as required by law. You are advised, however, to review any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our subsequent Forms 10-Q, 10-K, 8-K and other reports to the SEC.

Our operations are subject to a number of risks, including those listed below. When considering an investment in our securities, you should carefully read and consider these risks, together with all other information in this Report. If any of the events described in the following risk factors actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results, as well as the market price of our securities, could be materially adversely affected.

Business and Operating Risks

The cyclical nature of our businesses could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our financial performance is affected by the cyclical nature of the forest products and real estate industries. The markets for timber, real estate, performance fibers and wood products are influenced by a variety of factors beyond our control. For example, the demand for real estate can be affected by changes in interest rates, availability and terms of financing, local economic conditions, new housing starts, population growth and demographics. The demand for sawtimber is primarily affected by the level of new residential and commercial construction activity, and currently sawtimber pricing is below historic levels. Both our Real Estate and Timber businesses have been negatively impacted by the current economic downturn, primarily due to the decline in housing starts and the tightening of credit availability for real estate and construction related projects. The supply of timber and logs has historically increased during favorable pricing environments, which then causes downward pressure on prices.

The forest products and real estate industries are highly competitive.

Some of our competitors in the forest products businesses have greater financial and operating resources and own more timberlands than we do. Some of our forest products competitors may also be lower-cost producers in some of the businesses in which we operate. In addition, wood products are subject to significant competition from a variety of non-wood and engineered wood products. We are also subject to competition from various forest products, including logs and pulp products imported from foreign countries to the United States as well as to the export markets served by us. To the extent there is a significant increase in competitive pressures from substitute products or other domestic or foreign suppliers, our business could be adversely affected. With respect to our real estate business, one of our key strategies is to engage in activities that add long term value to our properties, including obtaining entitlements. Many of our competitors in this segment have greater experience in real estate entitlement than we do.

Changes in energy and raw material prices could impact our operating results and financial condition.

Energy and raw material costs, such as oil, natural gas, wood, and chemicals are a significant operating expense, particularly for the Performance Fibers and Wood Products businesses. The prices of raw materials and energy can be volatile and are susceptible to rapid and substantial increases due to factors beyond our control such as changing economic conditions, political unrest, instability in energy-producing nations, and supply and demand considerations. For example, in 2008, we experienced significant volatility in energy, chemicals, transportation and other input costs, although in 2009 pricing for some of these inputs has returned to relatively normal levels. Oil and natural gas costs have also substantially increased in recent years and we have experienced, at times, a limited availability of hardwood, primarily due to wet weather conditions which impacts harvesting and results in increased costs for some Performance Fibers products. Increases in production costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition

 

6


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

and results of operations. In addition, in our Timber, Performance Fibers and Wood Products businesses, the rising cost of fuel, and its impact on the cost and availability of transportation for our products, both domestically and internationally, and the cost and availability of third party logging and trucking services, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in global economic conditions, market trends and world events could impact customer demand.

The global reach of our business, particularly the Performance Fibers business and our interest in the New Zealand joint venture, causes us to be subject to unexpected, uncontrollable and rapidly changing events and circumstances in addition to those experienced in the U.S. The current global economic and financial market situation is an example of such changes. Adverse changes in the following factors, among others, could have a negative impact on our business and results of operations:

 

   

exposure to currencies other than the United States dollar;

 

   

regulatory, social, political, labor or economic conditions in a specific country or region; and,

 

   

trade protection laws, policies and measures and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment, including loss or modification of exemptions for taxes and tariffs, and import and export licensing requirements.

Our businesses are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations that may restrict or adversely impact our ability to conduct our business.

Environmental laws and regulations are constantly changing, and are generally becoming more restrictive. Laws, regulations and related judicial decisions, and administrative interpretations affecting our business are subject to change and new laws and regulations that may affect our business are frequently enacted. These changes may adversely affect our ability to harvest and sell timber, operate our manufacturing facilities, remediate contaminated properties and/or develop real estate. These laws and regulations may relate to, among other things, the protection of timberlands, endangered species, timber harvesting practices, recreation and aesthetics, protection and restoration of natural resources, air and water quality, and remedial standards for contaminated property and groundwater. Over time, the complexity and stringency of these laws and regulations have increased markedly and the enforcement of these laws and regulations has intensified. Moreover, environmental policies of the current administration are in the aggregate, more restrictive for industry and landowners than those of the previous administration. For example, in 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) proposed a number of initiatives which could, if implemented, impose additional operational and pollution control obligations on industrial facilities like those of Rayonier, especially in the area of air emissions and wastewater and stormwater control. Nonetheless, irrespective of any particular presidential administration, environmental laws and regulations will likely continue to become more restrictive and over time could adversely affect our operating results.

If regulatory and environmental permits are delayed, restricted or rejected, a variety of our operations could be adversely affected. In connection with a variety of operations on our properties, we are required to seek permission from government agencies in the states and countries in which we operate to perform certain activities. Any of these agencies could delay review of, or reject, any of our filings. In our Timber business, any delay associated with a filing could result in a delay or restriction in replanting, thinning, insect control, fire control or harvesting, any of which could have an adverse effect on our operating results. For example, in Washington State, we are required to file a Forest Practice Application for each unit of timberland to be harvested. These applications may be denied, conditioned or restricted by the regulatory agency or appealed by other parties, including citizen groups. Appeals or actions of the regulatory agencies could delay or restrict timber harvest activities pursuant to these permits. Delays or harvest restrictions on a significant number of applications could have an adverse effect on our operating results. In our Performance Fibers and Wood Products businesses, many modifications and capital projects at our manufacturing facilities require an environmental permit, or an amendment to an existing permit. Delays in obtaining these permits could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Environmental groups and interested individuals may seek to delay or prevent a variety of operations. We expect that environmental groups and interested individuals will intervene with increasing frequency in the regulatory processes in the states and countries where we own, lease or manage timberlands, and operate mills. For example, as described in more detail in Item 3 — Legal Proceedings, the Altamaha Riverkeeper, a non-profit environmental group, has alleged noncompliance by our Jesup mill with certain laws relating to its effluent discharge, and has threatened to file a “citizen suit” against

 

7


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Rayonier pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act if the group’s concerns are not addressed to their satisfaction. In Washington State, environmental groups and interested individuals may appeal individual forest practice applications or file petitions with the Forest Practices Board to challenge the regulations under which forest practices are approved. These and other challenges could materially delay or prevent operations on our properties. Delays or restrictions due to the intervention of environmental groups or interested individuals could adversely affect our operating results. In addition to intervention in regulatory proceedings, interested groups and individuals may file or threaten to file lawsuits that seek to prevent us from obtaining permits, implementing capital improvements or pursuing operating plans. Any lawsuit or even a threatened lawsuit could delay harvesting on our timberlands, impact how we operate or our ability to invest in our mills. Among the remedies that could be enforced in a lawsuit is a judgment preventing or restricting harvesting on a portion of our timberlands, or adversely affecting the projected operating benefits or cost of capital projects at our mills.

The impact of existing regulatory restrictions on future harvesting activities may be significant. Federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as those of other countries, which are intended to protect threatened and endangered species, as well as waterways and wetlands, limit and may prevent timber harvesting, road building and other activities on our timberlands. The threatened and endangered species restrictions apply to activities that would adversely impact a protected species or significantly degrade its habitat. The size of the area subject to restriction will vary depending on the protected species at issue, the time of year and other factors, but can range from less than one to several thousand acres. A number of species that naturally live on or near our timberlands, including the northern spotted owl, marbled murrelet, bald eagle, several species of salmon and trout in the Northwest, and the red cockaded woodpecker, bald eagle, wood stork, red hill salamander, and flatwoods salamander in the Southeast, are protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act or similar state laws. Other species, such as the gopher tortoise, are currently under review for possible protection. As we gain additional information regarding the presence of threatened or endangered species on our timberlands, or if other regulations, such as those that require buffers to protect water bodies, become more restrictive, the amount of our timberlands subject to harvest restrictions could increase.

Our Performance Fibers and Wood Products mills are subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations concerning air emissions, wastewater discharge, water usage and waste handling and disposal. Many of our operations are subject to stringent environmental laws, regulations and permits which contain conditions that govern how we operate our facilities and, in many cases, how much product we can produce. These laws, regulations and permits, now and in the future, may restrict our current production and limit our ability to increase production, and impose significant costs on our operations with respect to environmental compliance. For example, the U.S. EPA has recently proposed regulations governing the emission of certain air pollutants from industrial boilers, and the discharge of certain pollutants into Florida’s waterways. It is expected that, overall, these costs will likely increase over time as environmental laws, regulations and permit conditions become more stringent, and as the expectations of the communities in which we operate become more demanding.

We currently own or may acquire properties which may require environmental remediation or otherwise be subject to environmental and other liabilities. We currently own, or formerly operated, manufacturing facilities and discontinued operations, or may acquire timberlands and other properties, which are subject to environmental liabilities, such as remediation of hazardous material contamination and other existing or potential liabilities. For more detail, see Note 16 — Liabilities for Dispositions and Discontinued Operations. The cost of investigation and remediation of contaminated properties could increase operating costs and adversely affect financial results. Although we believe we currently have adequate reserves for the investigation and remediation of our properties, there can be no assurance that actual expenditures will not exceed our expectations, or that other unknown liabilities will not be discovered in the future.

Entitlement and development of real estate entails a lengthy, uncertain and costly approval process.

Entitlement and development of real estate entails extensive approval processes involving multiple regulatory jurisdictions. It is common for a project to require multiple approvals, permits and consents from federal, state and local governing and regulatory bodies. For example, in Florida, real estate projects must generally comply with the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (the “Growth Management Act”) and local land use and development regulations. In addition, in Florida, development projects that exceed certain specified regulatory thresholds require approval of a comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (“DRI”) application. Compliance with the Growth Management Act, local land development regulations and the DRI process is

 

8


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

usually lengthy and costly and significant conditions can be imposed on a developer with respect to a particular project. In addition, development of properties containing delineated wetlands may require one or more permits from the federal government. Any of these issues can materially affect the cost and timing of our real estate projects.

The real estate entitlement process is frequently a political one, which involves uncertainty and often extensive negotiation and concessions in order to secure the necessary approvals and permits. A significant amount of our development property is located in counties in which local governments face challenging issues relating to growth and development, including zoning and future land use, public services, water availability, infrastructure and funding for same, and the requirements of state law, especially in the case of Florida under the Growth Management Act and DRI process. In addition, anti-development groups are active, especially in Florida, in seeking constitutional amendments, legislation and other anti-growth limitations on real estate development activities. For example, it is expected that a proposed constitutional amendment, called “Amendment 4,” will appear on the Florida ballot in November 2010, which, if enacted, will impose significant limitations on the ability of Florida municipalities to change the approved uses of property. We expect that this type of anti-growth activity may continue in the future.

Issues affecting real estate development also include the availability of potable water for new development projects. For example, in Georgia, the Legislature enacted the Comprehensive Statewide Watershed Management Planning Act, which, among other things, created a governmental entity called the Georgia Water Council which was charged with preparing a comprehensive water management plan for the state and presenting it to the Georgia Legislature. It is unclear at this time how the plan will affect the cost and timing of real estate development along the I-95 coastal corridor in southern Georgia, where the Company has significant real estate holdings.

Changes in the interpretation or enforcement of these laws, the enactment of new laws regarding the use and development of real estate, changes in the political composition of state and local governmental bodies, and the identification of new facts regarding our properties could lead to new or greater costs and delays and liabilities that could materially adversely affect our business, profitability or financial condition.

Changes in demand for our real estate and delays in the timing of real estate transactions may affect our revenues and operating results.

A number of factors, including changes in demographics, tightening of credit, and a slowing of commercial or residential real estate development, particularly along the I-95 coastal corridor in Florida and Georgia, could reduce the demand for our properties and negatively affect our results of operations. The current decline in the economy generally and in the housing market in particular, together with the deterioration of the credit markets, has certainly had such an effect in 2009 and is expected to continue into 2010.

In addition, there are inherent uncertainties in the timing of real estate transactions that could adversely affect our operating results. Delays in the completion of transactions or the termination of potential transactions can be caused by factors beyond our control. These events have in the past and may in the future adversely affect our operating results.

The impacts of climate-related initiatives, at the international, federal and state levels, remain uncertain at this time.

Currently, there are numerous international, federal and state-level initiatives and proposals addressing domestic and global climate issues. Within the U.S., most of these proposals would regulate and/or tax, in one fashion or another, the production of carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gases” to facilitate the reduction of carbon compound emissions to the atmosphere, and provide tax and other incentives to produce and use more “clean energy.” For example, in 2009 the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Markey-Waxman bill (HR 2454), which would establish a so-called “cap and trade” regime and new permitting requirements to regulate greenhouse gas generation, as well as provide an incentive for the production and use of clean energy. To date, the U.S. Senate has not passed any comparable legislation. In sum, we believe that the potential for climate change legislation on the federal level is unknown. In addition, in late 2009, the U.S. EPA issued an “endangerment finding” under the Clear Air Act (“CAA”) with respect to carbon dioxide, which could lead to the regulation of carbon dioxide as a criteria pollutant under the CAA and have significant ramifications for Rayonier and the industry in general. On the international front, the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, which took place in December 2009, did not result in any significant progress toward a binding agreement to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.

 

9


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Overall, it is likely that future legislative and regulatory activity in this area will in some way impact Rayonier, but it is unclear at this time whether such impact will be, in the aggregate, positive or negative, or material. For example, while Rayonier’s Performance Fibers mills produce greenhouses gases and utilize fossil fuels, they also generate a substantial amount of their energy from wood fiber (often referred to as “biomass”), which is generally favored under most current legislative and regulatory proposals. In addition, our extensive timber holdings and the biomass they produce may provide opportunities for us to benefit from new legislation and regulation, especially due to the potential benefits available from carbon capture and sequestration opportunities, sale of “carbon credits” and “renewable portfolio standards” that mandate the use of non-fossil fuels by electricity generators, which could lead to increased demand for biomass products from our forests. We continue to monitor political and regulatory developments in this area, but their overall impact on Rayonier, from a cost, benefit and financial performance standpoint, is uncertain at this time.

The precipitous decline in the stock market in 2008 impacted our pension plan investment performance and despite partial recovery in 2009, absent additional federal legislation, may require us to make significant additional cash contributions to our plans.

We sponsor several defined benefit pension plans, which cover many of our salaried and hourly employees. Due to the precipitous decline in the stock market (the Dow Jones Industrial Average (“DJIA”) declined approximately 32 percent in 2008), the value of our pension plan equity assets has also dropped significantly. In 2009, the value of our plan’s assets increased as the stock market recovered (the DJIA increased approximately 19 percent in 2009). The Federal Pension Protection Act of 2006 (“PPA”) requires that certain capitalization levels be maintained in each of these plans. Recognizing that this issue affects much of corporate America, in December 2008 federal legislation was passed (as part of the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008) which provides short term relief to plan sponsors by allowing them to phase in the funding requirements of the PPA over three years, among other things. Because it is unknown how the stock market will perform over the next 12 to 24 months and whether additional legislation will be passed to address this issue, no assurances can be given that any additional plan contributions required by applicable law will not be material.

Our joint venture partners may have interests that differ from ours and may take actions that adversely affect us.

We participate in a joint venture in New Zealand, and may enter into other joint venture projects; for example, as part of our real estate strategy. A joint venture involves potential risks such as:

 

   

not having voting control over the joint venture;

 

   

the venture partner at any time may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours;

 

   

the venture partner may take actions contrary to our instructions or requests, or contrary to our policies or objectives with respect to the investment; and,

 

   

the venture partner could experience financial difficulties.

Actions by our venture partners may subject property owned by the joint venture to liabilities greater than those contemplated by the joint venture agreement or to other adverse consequences.

We may be unsuccessful in carrying out our land acquisition strategy.

We have pursued, and intend to continue to pursue, acquisitions of strategic timberland and real estate properties that meet our investment criteria. Our timberland and real estate acquisitions may not perform in accordance with our expectations. We anticipate financing any such acquisitions through cash from operations, borrowings under our credit facilities, proceeds from equity or debt offerings or proceeds from asset dispositions, or any combination thereof. The failure to identify and complete suitable timberland and real estate property acquisitions, and the failure of any acquisitions to perform to our expectations, could adversely affect our operating results.

Our failure to maintain satisfactory labor relations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Approximately 50 percent of our work force is unionized. These workers are exclusively in our Performance Fibers business. As a result, we are required to negotiate the wages, benefits and other terms with these employees collectively. Our financial results could be adversely affected if labor negotiations were to restrict the efficiency of our operations. In addition, our inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with any of these unions as existing agreements expire could result in strikes or work stoppages by the affected workers. For example, in 2010 we will engage in collective

 

10


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

bargaining agreement negotiations with unions representing substantially all of the hourly employees at our Fernandina Beach Performance Fibers mill. The mill’s current collective bargaining agreements expire in April 2010. If the unionized employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, or other employees were to become unionized, we could experience a significant disruption of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Weather and other natural conditions may limit our timber harvest and sales.

Weather conditions, timber growth cycles and restrictions on access may limit harvesting of our timberlands, as may other factors, including damage by fire, insect infestation, disease, prolonged drought and natural disasters such as wind storms and hurricanes.

We do not insure against losses of timber from any causes, including fire.

The volume and value of timber that can be harvested from our timberlands may be reduced by fire, insect infestation, severe weather, disease, natural disasters, and other causes beyond our control. A reduction in our timber inventory could adversely affect our financial results and cash flows. As is typical in the forestry industry, we do not maintain insurance for any loss to our timber, including losses due to these causes.

A significant portion of the timberland that we own, lease or manage is concentrated in limited geographic areas.

We own, lease or manage approximately 2.5 million acres of timberland and real estate located primarily in the United States and New Zealand. Over 75 percent of our timberlands are located in four states: Alabama, Florida, Georgia and Washington. Accordingly, if the level of production from these forests substantially declines, or if the demand for timber in those regions declines, it could have a material adverse effect on our overall production levels and our revenues.

We are dependent upon attracting and retaining key personnel.

We believe that our success depends, to a significant extent, upon our ability to attract and retain key senior management and operations management personnel. Our failure to recruit and retain these key personnel could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Market interest rates may influence the price of our common shares.

One of the factors that may influence the price of our common shares is our annual dividend yield as compared to yields on other financial instruments. Thus, an increase in market interest rates will result in higher yields on other financial instruments, which could adversely affect the price of our common shares.

We have a significant amount of debt and the capacity to incur significant additional debt.

As of December 31, 2009, we had $700 million of debt outstanding. See Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Contractual Financial Obligations for the payment schedule of our long-term debt obligations. We expect that existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, cash provided from operations, and our bank credit facilities will be sufficient to meet ongoing cash requirements. Moreover, we have the borrowing capacity to incur significant additional debt and may do so if we enter into one or more strategic, merger, acquisition or other corporate or investment opportunities, or otherwise invest capital in one or more of our businesses. However, failure to generate sufficient cash as our debt becomes due, or to renew credit lines prior to their expiration, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flow.

 

11


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

REIT and Tax-Related Risks

If we fail to qualify as a REIT or fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will have reduced funds available for distribution to our shareholders because our timber-related income will be subject to taxation.

We intend to operate in accordance with REIT requirements pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). For example, as a REIT, we generally will not pay corporate-level tax on income we distribute to our shareholders (other than the income of TRS) as long as we distribute at least 90 percent of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains). Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code, which are subject to change, perhaps retroactively, and which are not within our control. We cannot assure that we will qualify as a REIT or be able to remain so qualified or that new legislation, U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

If in any taxable year we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will suffer the following negative results:

 

   

we will not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income; and,

 

   

we will be subject to federal income tax on our REIT taxable income.

In addition, we will be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost, unless we are entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code. As a result, our net income and the cash available for distribution to our shareholders could be reduced for up to five years or longer.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we may need to borrow funds or liquidate some investments or assets to pay the additional tax liability. Accordingly, cash available for distribution to our shareholders would be reduced.

The extent of our use of taxable REIT subsidiaries may affect the price of our common shares relative to the share price of other REITs.

We conduct a significant portion of our business activities through one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. Our use of taxable REIT subsidiaries enables us to engage in non-REIT qualifying business activities such as the production and sale of performance fibers and wood products, real estate entitlement activities and sale of HBU property and other real estate (as a dealer) and sale of logs. Taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to corporate-level tax. Therefore, we pay income taxes on the income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries. Under the Code, no more than 25 percent of the value of the gross assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. This limitation may affect our ability to increase the size of our taxable REIT subsidiaries’ operations. Furthermore, our use of taxable REIT subsidiaries may cause the market to value our common shares differently than the shares of other REITs, which may not use taxable REIT subsidiaries as extensively as we use them.

Lack of shareholder ownership and transfer restrictions in our articles of incorporation may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

In order to qualify as a REIT, an entity cannot have five or fewer individuals who own, directly or indirectly after applying attribution of ownership rules, 50 percent or more of the value of its outstanding shares during the last six months in each calendar year. Although it is not required by law or the REIT provisions of the Code, almost all REITs have adopted ownership and transfer restrictions in their articles of incorporation or organizational documents which seek to assure compliance with that rule. While we are not in violation of the ownership rules, we do not have, nor do we have any current plans to adopt, share ownership and transfer restrictions. As such, the possibility exists that five or fewer individuals could acquire 50 percent or more of the value of our outstanding shares, which could result in our disqualification as a REIT.

We may be limited in our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

The ability of the REIT to receive dividends from taxable REIT subsidiaries is limited by the rules with which we must comply to maintain our status as a REIT. In particular, at least 75 percent of gross income for each taxable year as a REIT must be derived from passive real estate sources including sales of our standing timber and other types of qualifying real estate income and no more than 25 percent of our gross income may consist of dividends from our taxable REIT subsidiaries and other non-real estate income.

 

12


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

This limitation on our ability to receive dividends from our taxable REIT subsidiaries may impact our ability to fund cash distributions to our shareholders using cash flows from our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We can, however, under current law, issue stock dividends for up to 90 percent of our regular dividend distribution for calendar years 2009 through 2011. The net income of our taxable REIT subsidiaries is not required to be distributed, and income that is not distributed will not be subject to the REIT income distribution requirement.

Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to prohibited transactions tax.

As a REIT, we will be subject to a 100 percent tax on any net income from “prohibited transactions.” In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property to customers in the ordinary course of business. Sales of performance fibers and wood products which we produce and sales of logs constitute prohibited transactions. In addition, sales of timberlands or other real estate (as a dealer) constitute prohibited transactions.

We intend to avoid the 100 percent prohibited transactions tax by conducting activities that would otherwise be prohibited transactions through one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. We may not, however, always be able to identify timberland properties that will become part of our “dealer” real estate sales business. Therefore, if we sell timberlands which we incorrectly identify as property not held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or which subsequently become properties held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, we face the potential of being subject to the 100 percent prohibited transactions tax.

Our cash dividends are not guaranteed and may fluctuate.

Generally, REITs are required to distribute 90 percent of their ordinary taxable income, but not their net capital gains income. Accordingly, we do not believe that we are required to distribute material amounts of cash since substantially all of our taxable income is treated as capital gains income. Our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, determines the amount of quarterly dividends to be provided to our shareholders based on consideration of a number of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions, tax considerations, borrowing capacity and other factors, including debt covenant restrictions that may impose limitations on cash payments, future acquisitions and divestitures, harvest levels, changes in the price and demand for our products and general market demand for timberlands including those timberland properties that have higher and better uses. Consequently, our dividend levels may fluctuate.

We may not be able to complete desired like-kind exchange transactions for timberlands and real estate we sell.

When we sell timberlands and real estate, we generally seek to match these sales with the acquisition of suitable replacement timberlands. This allows us “like-kind exchange” treatment for these transactions under section 1031 and related regulations of the Code. This matching of sales and purchases provides us with significant tax benefits, most importantly the deferral of any gain on the property sold until ultimate disposition of the replacement property. While we attempt to complete like-kind exchanges wherever practical, we will not be able to do so in all instances due to various factors, including the lack of availability of suitable replacement property on acceptable terms, our inability to complete a qualifying like-kind exchange transaction within the time frames required by the Code and if we incorrectly identify real estate as property not held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. The inability to obtain like-kind exchange treatment would result in the payment of taxes with respect to the property sold, and a corresponding reduction in earnings and cash available for distribution to shareholders as dividends.

Alternative fuel mixture credit.

The Company has disclosed information concerning its eligibility for the alternative fuel mixture credit. See Note 3 — Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit (“AFMC”) for additional information. Under applicable law, which expired on December 31, 2009, the tax credit was earned through the burning of qualifying fuel mixtures on or before such date. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the Company’s eligibility for, and amount of, such tax credit.

 

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

13


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The following table details the significant properties we own, lease, or manage by reportable segment (acres in millions):

 

Segment/Operations

  

Location

   Total Acres    Fee-Owned Acres    Long-Term
Leased Acres
   Managed Acres

Timber

   Eastern region    1.7    1.4    0.3    —  
  

Western region

   0.4    0.4    —      —  
  

New Zealand(1)

   0.3    —      —      0.3
                      
   Total Timber Acres    2.4    1.8    0.3    0.3

Real Estate

  

U.S.

   0.1    0.1    —      —  
                      

Total Timberland and Real Estate Acres

   2.5    1.9    0.3    0.3
                      

 

         

Capacity/Function

  Owned/Leased

Performance Fibers

  

Jesup, Georgia

  

590,000 metric tons of pulp

  Owned
  

Fernandina Beach, Florida

  

150,000 metric tons of pulp

  Owned
  

Jesup, Georgia

  

Research Facility

  Owned

Wood Products(2)

  

Baxley, Georgia

  

160 million board feet of lumber

  Owned
  

Swainsboro, Georgia

  

120 million board feet of lumber

  Owned
  

Eatonton, Georgia

  

  90 million board feet of lumber

  Owned

Wood Fiber Facilities

  

Offerman, Georgia

  

690,000 short green tons of wood chips

  Owned
  

Eastman, Georgia

  

350,000 short green tons of wood chips

  Owned
  

Barnesville, Georgia

  

350,000 short green tons of wood chips

  Owned
  

Jarratt, Virginia

  

250,000 short green tons of wood chips

  Owned

Corporate and Other

  

Jacksonville, Florida

  

Corporate Headquarters

  Leased

 

(1)

Represents acres under Rayonier management, owned by the New Zealand joint venture. Rayonier owned a 40 percent interest at December 31, 2009. See Item 1— Business for information concerning Rayonier’s decrease in ownership of the joint venture to 26 percent in February 2010.

(2)

These locations also have a combined annual production capacity of approximately 700,000 short green tons of wood chips.

Our manufacturing facilities are maintained through ongoing capital investments, regular maintenance and equipment upgrades. During 2009, our Performance Fibers manufacturing facilities produced at or near capacity levels for most of the year. The Wood Products sawmills produced at a reduced capacity due to decreased demand from a weak housing market.

 

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company has been named as a defendant in various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business. While we have procured reasonable and customary insurance covering risks normally occurring in connection with our businesses, we have in certain cases retained some risk through the operation of self-insurance, primarily in the areas of workers’ compensation, property insurance and general liability. In our opinion, these other lawsuits and claims, either individually or in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

Discussed below are certain ongoing environmental proceedings. For further information on our environmental proceedings, see Note 16 — Liabilities for Dispositions and Discontinued Operations.

Jesup Mill Effluent Issue — In March 2008, the Company and the Environmental Protection Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (“EPD”) entered into a consent order to resolve certain potential compliance issues relating to the Jesup mill’s permitted effluent discharged to the Altamaha River. Under the consent order, Rayonier has agreed to implement a color reduction plan which will include installation of additional brown stock washing capacity to better remove residual pulping liquors from cooked wood pulp and oxygen delignification technology which reduces the lignin content in

 

14


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

the pulp prior to bleaching, spill recovery systems and modifications to certain operating practices. These projects are expected to be completed by the end of 2015, pursuant to a time frame set forth in the consent order, at a total cost of approximately $83.8 million. Through December 31, 2009, approximately $16.5 million has been spent. The consent order also provides for decreasing color limits in the mill’s effluent over the seven year period as projects are completed. No citations, fines or penalties are imposed by the consent order, except that stipulated penalties may be assessed by EPD in the event that the projects are not completed on the agreed schedule.

In December of 2008, Rayonier received a “sixty day letter” from lawyers representing a non-profit environmental organization, Altamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. (“ARK”), threatening a citizen’s suit under the federal Clean Water Act (the “CWA”) and analogous state law if ARK and Rayonier are unable to settle their differences within sixty days of the date of the letter. ARK primarily claims that the color and odor of the mill’s effluent violates provisions of the federal Clean Water Act and the Georgia Water Quality Control Act, and further asserts that the March 2008 consent order between EPD and the Company does not appropriately address the issues of concern. Rayonier believes that it has good defenses to ARK’s claims including, without limitation, that the mill is in compliance with both applicable law and its wastewater discharge permit issued by EPD, and that the consent order constitutes a bar to the threatened citizen suit under the applicable provisions of the CWA. However, to avoid the cost and risks of litigation, the Company has engaged in discussions with ARK to explore whether a settlement is possible. Assuming that no settlement is reached, ARK has the right to file a lawsuit against the Company in respect of its claims, although as of the date of this filing no such suit has been filed.

 

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders of Rayonier during the fourth quarter of 2009.

 

15


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

PART II

 

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Prices of our Common Shares; Dividends

The table below reflects the range of market prices of our Common Shares as reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system of the NYSE, the only exchange on which our shares are listed, under the trading symbol RYN.

 

     High    Low    Dividends

2009

        

Fourth Quarter

   $ 43.92    $ 37.88    $ 0.50

Third Quarter

   $ 45.00    $ 33.63    $ 0.50

Second Quarter

   $ 41.79    $ 29.35    $ 0.50

First Quarter

   $ 32.40    $ 22.28    $ 0.50

2008

        

Fourth Quarter

   $ 47.09    $ 26.58    $ 0.50

Third Quarter

   $ 49.54    $ 40.60    $ 0.50

Second Quarter

   $ 48.00    $ 41.88    $ 0.50

First Quarter

   $ 47.37    $ 35.36    $ 0.50

For information about covenants of our credit facility that could restrict our ability to pay cash dividends in the future, see Note 13 — Debt — Debt Covenants.

On February 23, 2010, the Company announced a first quarter dividend of 50 cents per share payable March 31, 2010, to shareholders of record on March 10, 2010. There were approximately 9,883 shareholders of record of our Common Shares on February 19, 2010.

Issuer Repurchases

In 1996, we began a Common Share repurchase program (the “anti-dilutive program”) to minimize the dilutive effect on earnings per share of our employee incentive stock plans. This program limits the number of shares that may be purchased each year to the greater of 1.5 percent of outstanding shares at the beginning of the year or the number of incentive shares issued to employees during the year. In October 2000 and July 2003, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of additional shares totaling 1.4 million. These shares were authorized separately from the anti-dilutive program, and neither have expiration dates. In 2009, there were no shares repurchased under these plans. As of December 31, 2009, there were 2,472,255 shares available for repurchase.

 

16


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the performance of Rayonier’s Common Shares (assuming reinvestment of dividends) with a broad-based market index (Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500), and two industry-specific indices (the S&P 1500 Paper and Forest Products Index and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) Equity REIT Index).

The table and related information shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

LOGO

The data in the following table was used to create the above graph:

 

     31-Dec-04    31-Dec-05    31-Dec-06    31-Dec-07    31-Dec-08    31-Dec-09

Rayonier Inc.

   $ 100    $ 128    $ 138    $ 166    $ 116    $ 165

S&P 500®

   $ 100    $ 105    $ 121    $ 128    $ 81    $ 102

S&P© 1500 Paper & Forest Products Index

   $ 100    $ 96    $ 102    $ 101    $ 42    $ 83

NAREIT Equity REIT

   $ 100    $ 112    $ 151    $ 128    $ 80    $ 102

 

17


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following financial data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

     At or For the Years Ended December 31,  
     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
     (dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)  

Profitability:

          

Sales

   $ 1,169      $ 1,271      $ 1,225      $ 1,230      $ 1,181   

Operating income before the gain on sale of New Zealand timber assets(1) (2)

     410        226        247        222        175   

Operating income(1) (2)

     410        226        247        230        212   

Income from continuing operations(3)

     313        149        174        171        202   

Net income(3)

     313        149        174        176        178   

Diluted earnings per common share:

          

Continuing operations

     3.91        1.87        2.20        2.19        2.61   

Net income

     3.91        1.87        2.20        2.26        2.29   

Financial Condition:

          

Total assets

   $ 2,253      $ 2,082      $ 2,068      $ 1,965      $ 1,841   

Total debt

     700        747        721        659        559   

Shareholders’ equity

     1,146        939        1,000        918        894   

Shareholders’ equity — per share

     14.41        11.91        12.78        11.94        11.74   

Cash Flows:

          

Cash provided by operating activities

   $ 307      $ 340      $ 324      $ 307      $ 262   

Capital expenditures

     92        105        97        105        85   

Purchase of timberlands, real estate and other

     —          234        27        299        24   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     158        168        165        136        153   

Cash dividends paid

     158        157        151        144        129   

Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

          

EBITDA(4)

          

Timber

   $ 77      $ 116      $ 146      $ 152      $ 147   

Real Estate

     80        101        98        91        68   

Performance Fibers

     242        205        209        153        121   

Wood Products

     (6     (1     (2     4        (12

Other Operations

     (3     3        (3     2        2   

Corporate and other(1)

     178        (29     (36     (28     13   
                                        

Total EBITDA

   $ 568      $ 395      $ 412      $ 374      $ 339   
                                        

Debt to EBITDA

     1.2 to 1        1.9 to 1        1.8 to 1        1.8 to 1        1.6 to 1   

Performance Ratios (%):

          

Operating income to sales

     35        18        20        19        18   

Return on equity(5)

     30        15        18        19        24   

Return on capital(5)

     18        9        11        11        14   

Debt to capital

     38        44        42        42        38   

Other:

          

Timberland and real estate acres — owned, leased, or managed, in millions of acres

     2.5        2.6        2.5        2.7        2.5   

Dividends paid — per share

   $ 2.00      $ 2.00      $ 1.94      $ 1.88      $ 1.71   

 

18


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

     For the Years Ended December 31,
     2009    2008    2007    2006    2005

Selected Operating Data:

              

Timber

              

Timber sales volume

              

Western U.S. — in millions of board feet

   166    232    254    274    263

Eastern U.S. — in thousands of short green tons

   6,401    6,824    6,168    4,740    4,832

New Zealand — in thousands of metric tons

   n/a    n/a    n/a    n/a    464

Real Estate—acres sold

              

Development

   789    501    4,356    9,377    6,036

Rural

   15,628    15,845    12,817    16,874    23,990

Non-Strategic Timberlands

   53,703    49,801    —      —      —  
                        

Total Acres Sold

   70,120    66,147    17,173    26,251    30,026
                        

Performance Fibers

              

Sales volume (thousands of metric tons)

              

Cellulose specialties

   464    471    467    474    470

Absorbent materials

   270    253    259    272    276
                        

Total

   734    724    726    746    746
                        

Wood Products

              

Lumber sales volume — in millions of board feet

   224    321    329    350    351

 

(1)

The 2009 results include income of $205.2 million related to the AFMC.

(2)

The 2007 results include a $10.9 million loss from wildfires on timberlands in southeast Georgia and northeast Florida.

(3)

The 2009 results include income of $192.8 million related to the AFMC.

(4)

EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization. EBITDA is a non-GAAP valuation measure used by the Chief Operating Decision Maker, existing shareholders and potential shareholders to measure how management is performing relative to the assets with which they have been entrusted. See page 20 for a reconciliation of Operating Income to EBITDA in total and by segment and page 33 for a reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA.

(5)

Return on equity is calculated by dividing income from continuing operations by the average of the opening (1/1/XX) and ending (12/31/XX) shareholders’ equity for each period presented. Return on capital is calculated by dividing income from continuing operations by the sum of average shareholders’ equity and average outstanding debt.

 

19


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

EBITDA Reconciliation

Historically, we have viewed EBITDA as both a liquidity and performance measure, but predominantly as a liquidity measure reconciling it to Cash Provided by Operating Activities. However, over time, our Chief Operating Decision Maker and management have come to view EBITDA as more of a performance measure. As such, we now reconcile EBITDA to Net Income for the consolidated Company and Operating Income for the Segments, as those are the nearest GAAP measures for each. The reconciliations to the nearest GAAP measure for prior periods have been adjusted appropriately.

Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) by Segment to EBITDA by Segment

(dollars in millions)

 

         Timber    Real
Estate
   Performance
Fibers
   Wood
Products
    Other     Corporate
and
Eliminations
    Total  

2009

                   

Operating income (loss)(1)

   $ 6.5    $ 56.1    $ 183.6    $ (10.9   $ (3.1   $ 177.3      $ 409.5   

Add:

 

 Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     70.5      24.1      58.5      4.6        0.1        0.6        158.4   

Less:

 

 Non-operating expense

     —        —        —        —          —          (0.3     (0.3
                                                       

EBITDA(1)

   $ 77.0    $ 80.2    $ 242.1    $ (6.3   $ (3.0   $ 177.6      $ 567.6   
                                                       

2008

                   

 Operating income (loss)

   $ 30.8    $ 80.3    $ 148.6    $ (6.4   $ 3.0      $ (29.9   $ 226.4   

Add:

 

 Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     84.8      21.1      56.2      5.7        —          0.4        168.2   

Less:

 

 Non-operating expense

     —        —        —        —          —          (0.1     (0.1
                                                       

EBITDA

   $ 115.6    $ 101.4    $ 204.8    $ (0.7   $ 3.0      $ (29.6   $ 394.5   
                                                       

2007

                   

 Operating income (loss)

   $ 60.3    $ 92.8    $ 141.0    $ (8.4   $ (3.2   $ (35.9   $ 246.6   

Add:

 

 Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     85.5      5.0      68.4      6.1        —          0.1        165.1   
                                                       

 EBITDA

   $ 145.8    $ 97.8    $ 209.4    $ (2.3   $ (3.2   $ (35.8   $ 411.7   
                                                       

2006

                   

Operating income (loss)

   $ 98.6    $ 88.6    $ 79.9    $ (2.8   $ 1.3      $ (35.9   $ 229.7   

Add:

 

 Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     53.3      2.0      72.9      6.9        0.6        0.8        136.5   

Add:

 

 Discontinued operations

     —        —        —        —          —          8.5        8.5   

Less:

 

 Non-operating expense

     —        —        —        —          —          (0.6     (0.6
                                                       

EBITDA

   $ 151.9    $ 90.6    $ 152.8    $ 4.1      $ 1.9      $ (27.2   $ 374.1   
                                                       

2005

                   

Operating income (loss)

   $ 87.0    $ 63.7    $ 44.6    $ 16.4      $ 0.8      $ (0.8   $ 211.7   

Add:

 

 Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     60.1      4.4      75.0      7.1        0.8        5.9        153.3   

Less:

 

 Discontinued operations

     —        —        —        (35.4     —          —          (35.4

Add:

 

 Non-operating income

     —        —        1.8      —          —          7.6        9.4   
                                                       

EBITDA

   $ 147.1    $ 68.1    $ 121.4    $ (11.9   $ 1.6      $ 12.7      $ 339.0   
                                                       

 

(1)

Corporate and Eliminations includes $205.2 million related to the AFMC. See Note 3—Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit (“AFMC”) for additional information.

 

20


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary

Our revenues, operating income and cash flows are primarily derived from three core business segments: Timber, Real Estate and Performance Fibers. We own or lease (under long-term agreements) approximately 2.2 million acres of timberland and real estate in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, New York, Oklahoma, Texas, and Washington. We believe we are the seventh largest private landowner in the United States. Our Real Estate business seeks to maximize the value of our properties which are more valuable for development, recreational or conservation uses than for growing timber, and sell our non-strategic timberland. Our Performance Fibers business has been a supplier of premier cellulose specialty grades of pulp for over eighty years.

We have consistently generated strong cash flows and operating results by focusing on the following critical financial measures: segment operating income and EBITDA, cash available for distribution in total and on a per-share basis, debt to EBITDA ratio, debt to capital ratio, return on equity, return on fair market value (Timber and Real Estate) and return on capital employed (Performance Fibers). Key non-financial measures include safety and environmental performance, quality, production as a percent of capacity and various yield statistics.

Our focus is on cash generation, prudent allocation of capital and maximizing returns for shareholders. Our strategy consists of the following key elements:

 

   

Increase the size and quality of our timberland holdings through cash-accretive timberland acquisitions while selling timberland that no longer meets our strategic or financial return requirements. This strategy, which requires a disciplined approach and rigorous adherence to strategic and financial metrics, can result in significant year-to-year variation in timberland acquisitions and divestitures. For example, we acquired 110,000 acres of timberland in 2008 and 6,000 acres in 2007, but none in 2009. We sold approximately 54,000 acres and 50,000 acres of non-strategic timberland in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

   

Extract maximum value from our HBU properties. We will pursue entitlement activity on development property while maintaining a rural HBU program of sales for conservation, recreation and industrial uses. We currently have 7,900 acres of entitled land in Georgia and are actively working to entitle 32,000 acres in Florida.

 

   

Differentiate our Performance Fibers business by developing and improving customer specific applications. We will also emphasize operational excellence to ensure quality, reliability and efficiency.

We continuously evaluate our capital structure. Our year-end debt-to-capital ratio was 38 percent and our debt-to-EBITDA ratio was 1.2. We believe that a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of up to three times is appropriate to keep our weighted-average cost of capital low while maintaining an investment grade debt rating as well as retaining the flexibility to actively pursue growth opportunities.

We have historically had conservative leverage and believe in keeping ample liquidity and flexibility. Maintaining an investment grade debt rating has been a key element of this overall financial strategy as it historically allowed access to corporate debt markets even in difficult economic conditions. In August 2009, we issued $172.5 million of 4.50% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2015, with approximately $138 million of the proceeds used to retire debt, including $122 million of 8.39% installment notes that matured in December 2009. We have $235 million of available borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2009. This facility expires in August 2011.

In 2009, we qualified for a $215 million alternative fuel mixture credit based on the use of alternative fuels in our Performance Fibers mills. This tax credit expired on December 31, 2009. We applied approximately $20 million of the credit against 2009 estimated tax payments and expect to apply another $15 million against 2010 estimated tax payments. The remaining $180 million should be received in mid-2010 after the filing of our 2009 tax return. We expect to use these proceeds for strategic growth opportunities, capital expenditures in our Performance Fibers mills and for additional pension contributions.

We maintain four qualified defined benefit plans and one unfunded plan to provide benefits in excess of amounts allowable under current law. During 2009, the return on our pension assets related to the four qualified plans increased, which resulted in an improvement to our funded status at December 31, 2009. Although we are not required to make any pension contributions in 2010, we may contribute up to the $40 million to $50 million range, a significant increase from our 2009 contributions of $10 million.

 

21


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Our strategic capital is expected to be allocated primarily to our Timber segment, with the remainder in Performance Fibers and Real Estate. We have a commitment to borrow $75 million from a group of banks via a five-year note at LIBOR plus 287.5 basis points, which we expect to access by March 1, 2010. We may incur additional debt in connection with strategic growth opportunities that would cause us to exceed the debt-to-capital ratio mentioned above.

In 2009, our annual dividend was $2.00 per share, unchanged from 2008. Our 2010 dividend payments are expected to total $160 million assuming no change in the current rate.

Overall, we believe we have adequate liquidity and sources of capital to run our businesses efficiently and effectively and to maximize the value of assets under management. We expect cash flow from operations to adequately cover planned capital expenditures, interest expense, pension contributions and dividends in 2010.

Operational Strategies

Timber is sold primarily through an auction process, although it is also marketed through log supply agreements, particularly in the Western region. We operate Timber as a stand-alone business, requiring our mills to purchase logs at prevailing market rates. This promotes realizing market value, generating a true measure of fair value returns in Timber and minimizing the possibility of our manufacturing facilities being subsidized with below market-cost wood. We focus on optimizing Timber returns by continually improving productivity and yields through advanced silvicultural practices which take into account soil, climate and biological considerations. We also actively pursue other non-timber sources of income, primarily hunting and other recreational licenses. Finally, we evaluate timberland acquisitions and pursue those that meet our financial and strategic criteria.

A significant portion of our acreage is more valuable for development, recreational or conservation purposes than for growing timber. To maximize the value of our development properties, our strategy is to engage in value-added entitlement activities versus selling real estate in bulk. We continue to seek entitlements for holdings in the Southeast to add to our 7,900 acres of entitled land in Georgia. Additionally, in 2009 we continued our strategy of selling non-strategic timberland holdings that do not meet our investment criteria, which enables us to redeploy capital to higher returning assets.

In Performance Fibers, the focus has been to improve our position as a premier supplier of cellulose specialties, which comprised 63 percent of our 2009 sales volume. The remainder of our volume is in absorbent materials consisting primarily of fluff pulp. We are a market leader in cellulose specialties, utilizing our considerable technical applications expertise to customize products to exacting specifications, which allows differentiation from most competitors. Fluff pulp is a semi-commodity with opportunity for differentiation by price and customer service, although we do explore alternatives to enhance the value of these fibers. There are a number of much larger companies in the fluff pulp market and we are not a market leader.

Cost control is a critical element to remaining competitive in the Performance Fibers markets. The keys to success are operating continuously, safely, and efficiently while closely managing raw material and conversion costs. Capital expenditures typically are directed toward efficiency projects, cost reduction, product enhancements, and environmental requirements. Historically, we have used a significant amount of fossil fuels to operate our mills. To reduce cost, we completed a number of capital projects to reduce fossil fuel consumption, including a power boiler replacement at our Fernandina Beach, Florida facility, which consumes primarily wood waste.

Our capital expenditures totaled $92 million in 2009. For 2010, capital expenditures (excluding strategic acquisitions) are expected to range from $140 million to $145 million. The great majority of this increase is planned for Performance Fibers for cost reduction and efficiency projects as well as environmental expenditures required under a 2008 consent decree.

Industry and Market Conditions

Timber markets continued to soften in 2009 caused by the declining demand for lumber due to considerably weakened housing and construction markets. Lumber prices decreased significantly in 2009, hitting fifteen-year lows, and demand for sawtimber dropped accordingly. However, demand for pulpwood remained relatively stable. We adjusted our timber harvest levels to these conditions, harvesting at approximately 60% of sustainable levels in our Washington property (primarily sawtimber) while continuing to harvest primarily pulpwood on our Southeastern holdings. In 2010, we expect results to exceed 2009 as higher prices will more than offset lower volumes.

 

22


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

In Real Estate, our sales mix was consistent with prior year as demand for non-strategic timberlands and rural property held steady, while demand for development property remained soft due to the weak housing market and overall economic decline. We expect similar conditions in the near term.

In Performance Fibers, acetate demand remains strong. Sales are typically made under one to five year contracts which establish prices and target volumes at the beginning of the year and buffer some of the changes in supply and demand typically seen in worldwide commodity pulp and paper markets. We have long-term contracts with the world’s largest manufacturers of acetate-based products and other key customers that extend into 2011 and represent nearly all of our high value cellulose specialties production. Our recognized technical and market leadership has allowed us to maintain strong pricing across our cellulose specialties product lines. In 2009, a small amount of new capacity from competitors in the Southern hemisphere came on-line. This new volume did not affect our 2009 results, and we do not expect this new capacity to adversely impact our results in 2010. However, it is unclear how these market dynamics may impact our business in 2011 and beyond.

Absorbent materials prices decreased in 2009 reflecting the weak global economy. Prices in 2010 are expected to increase slightly above 2009 levels. Sales of absorbent materials are typically made with an annual volume agreement that allows price to move with the market during the year.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and to disclose contingent assets and liabilities in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We base these estimates and assumptions on historical data and trends, current fact patterns, expectations and other sources of information we believe are reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different conditions.

Merchantable inventory and depletion costs as determined by forestry timber harvest models

Significant assumptions and estimates are used in the recording of timberland inventory cost and depletion. We employ a forestry technical services group at each of our timberland management locations. Merchantable standing timber inventory is estimated annually, using industry-standard computer software. The inventory calculation takes into account growth, in-growth (annual transfer of oldest pre-merchantable age class into merchantable inventory), timberland sales and the annual harvest specific to each business unit. The age at which timber is considered merchantable is reviewed periodically and updated for changing harvest practices, future harvest age profiles and biological growth factors.

An annual depletion rate is established at each business unit for their particular regions by dividing merchantable inventory book cost by standing merchantable inventory. Pre-merchantable records are maintained for each planted year age class, recording acres planted, stems per acre, and costs of planting and tending. Changes in the assumptions and/or estimations used in these calculations may affect our results, in particular, timber inventory and depletion costs. Factors that can impact timber volume include weather changes, losses due to natural causes, differences in actual versus estimated growth rates and changes in the age when timber is considered merchantable. A three percent company-wide change in estimated standing merchantable inventory would cause 2009 depletion expense to change by approximately $2.0 million.

An acquisition of timberlands can also affect the depletion rate. Upon the acquisition of timberland, the Company makes a determination on whether to combine the newly acquired merchantable timber with an existing depletion pool or to create a new separate pool. The determination is based on the geographic location of the new timber, the customers/markets that will be served, and species mix compared to its existing timberland holdings. During the second quarter of 2008, Rayonier acquired approximately 56,300 acres of timberland located in Washington State resulting in a higher depletion rate, which increased depletion by $11.1 million and $6.4 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Depreciation and impairment of long-lived assets

Depreciation expense is computed using the units-of-production method for the Performance Fibers plant and equipment and the straight-line method on all other property, plant and equipment over the useful economic lives of the assets involved. We believe that these depreciation methods are the most appropriate under the circumstances as they most closely match revenues with expenses versus other generally accepted accounting methods. Long-lived assets are periodically reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may

 

23


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

not be recoverable. Cash flows used in such impairment analyses are based on long-range plan projections, which take into account recent sales and cost data as well as macroeconomic drivers including customer demand and industry capacity. The physical life of equipment, however, may be shortened by economic obsolescence caused by environmental regulation, competition and other causes.

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, our Wood Products sawmills curtailed production due to the weak market conditions. In 2010, we expect to continue to operate at reduced production levels unless market conditions improve. Based on long range plan projections, we estimate that our carrying amount is recoverable through future operations.

Environmental costs associated with dispositions and discontinued operations

At December 31, 2009, we had $99 million of accrued liabilities for environmental costs relating to past dispositions and discontinued operations. Numerous cost assumptions are used in estimating these obligations. Factors affecting these estimates include significant changes in contamination, discharge or treatment volumes, requirements to perform additional or different remediation, changes in environmental remediation technology, the extent of groundwater contamination migration, additional findings of contaminated soil, groundwater or sediment off-site, remedy selection, changes in law or interpretation of existing law and the outcome of negotiations with governmental agencies. We periodically review our environmental liabilities and also engage third party consultants to assess our ongoing remediation of contaminated sites. A significant change in any of the estimates could have a material effect on the results of our operations. Typically, these cost estimates do not vary significantly on a quarter to quarter basis.

Expenditures for environmental costs at these sites totaled $8 million in 2009. Annual expenditures in 2010, 2011 and 2012 are expected to be approximately $11 million, $9 million and $10 million, respectively.

Determining the adequacy of pension and other postretirement benefit assets and liabilities

We have four qualified benefit plans which cover most of our U.S. workforce and an unfunded plan to provide benefits in excess of amounts allowable under current tax law to certain participants in the qualified plans. Three of these plans are closed to new participants. Pension expense for all plans was $11 million in 2009. Numerous estimates and assumptions are required to determine the proper amount of pension and postretirement liabilities and annual expense to record in our financial statements. The key assumptions include discount rate, return on assets, salary increases, health care cost trends, mortality rates, longevity and service lives of employees. Although there is authoritative guidance on how to select most of these assumptions, we exercise some degree of judgment when selecting these assumptions based on input from our actuary. Different assumptions, as well as actual versus expected results, would change the periodic benefit cost and funded status of the benefit plans recognized in the financial statements.

In determining pension expense in 2009, a $21 million return was assumed based on an expected long-term rate of return of 8.5 percent. The actual return for 2009 was a gain of $51 million, or 29 percent. Our long-term return assumption was established based on historical long-term rates of return on broad equity and bond indices, discussions with our actuary and investment advisors and consideration of the actual annualized rate of return from 1994 (the date of our spin-off from ITT Corporation) through 2009. At the end of 2009, we reviewed this assumption for reasonableness and determined that the 2010 long-term rate of return assumption should remain at 8.5 percent. At December 31, 2009, our asset mix consisted of 65 percent equities, 32 percent bonds and 3 percent real estate. We do not expect this mix to change materially in the near future.

The Company’s pension plans were underfunded by $93 million at December 31, 2009, a $9 million improvement in funding status from December 31, 2008 due primarily to the favorable asset returns and employer contributions. In 2009, we made contributions of $10 million, of which $8 million was mandatory. We made discretionary contributions of $8 million and $20 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. In 2010, we may make discretionary contributions, which could be up to the $40 million to $50 million range in order to improve the funding status of the plans. Proceeds from the AFMC, which will be received in 2010, will be the primary source of funding. See Note 3 — Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit (“AFMC”) for additional information on the AFMC. Future requirements will vary depending on actual investment performance, changes in valuation assumptions, interest rates, requirements under the Pension Protection Act, and other employee related matters. See Item 1A — Risk Factors for more information about the potential risk of increased funding requirements.

 

24


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

In determining future pension obligations, we select a discount rate based on information supplied by our actuary. The actuarial rates are developed by models which incorporate high quality (AAA and AA rated), long-term corporate bond rates into their calculations. The discount rate at December 31, 2009 of 5.80 percent decreased slightly from the 6.15 percent rate used at December 31, 2008.

We expect 2010 pension expense to increase to $13 million from $11 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in the amortization of actuarial losses resulting from the 2008 stock market decline and a decrease in the discount rate. Future pension expense will be impacted by many factors including actual investment performance, changes in discount rates, timing of contributions and other employee related matters.

The sensitivity of pension expense and projected benefit obligation to changes in economic assumptions is highlighted below:

 

     Impact on:

Change in Assumption

       Pension Expense             Projected Benefit
Obligation

25 bp decrease in discount rate

   +1.0 million       +10.2 million

25 bp increase in discount rate

   -1.0 million       -9.7 million

25 bp decrease in long-term return on assets

   +0.6 million      

25 bp increase in long-term return on assets

   -0.6 million      

In September 2008, the Company changed its postretirement medical plan for active and retired salaried employees to shift retiree medical costs to the plan participants over a three year phase-out period. Accordingly, at the beginning of 2012, the Company’s intent is to no longer incur retiree medical costs for retired salary plan participants. The change was accounted for as a negative plan amendment and curtailment which resulted in a reduction to the retiree medical liability. The net impact of the reduction was an unrecognized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income of $8 million, which is being amortized over 1.9 years, the average remaining service period of the remaining active participants, and a $24 million decrease to the Company’s postretirement liability.

Realizability of both recorded and unrecorded tax assets and liabilities

As a REIT, certain operations are generally not subject to taxation. Our taxes can vary significantly based on the mix of income between our REIT and TRS businesses, thereby impacting our effective tax rate and the amount of taxes paid during fiscal periods. Also, our projection of estimated tax for the year and our provision for quarterly taxes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, may have significant variability. Similarly, the assessment of the ability to realize certain deferred tax assets, or estimate deferred tax liabilities, may be subjective.

We have recorded certain deferred tax assets that we believe will be realized in future periods. These assets are reviewed periodically in order to assess their realizability. This review requires us to make assumptions and estimates about future profitability affecting the realization of these tax benefits. If the review indicates that the realizability may be less than likely, a valuation allowance is recorded at that time.

Our income tax returns are subject to audit by U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxing authorities. In evaluating the tax benefits associated with various tax filing positions, we record a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position if it is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement of the issue. We record a liability for an uncertain tax position that does not meet this criterion. The liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits are adjusted in the period in which it is determined the issue is settled with the taxing authorities, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when new facts or information becomes available. See Note 10 — Income Taxes for additional information on our unrecognized tax benefits.

 

25


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Summary of our results of operations for the three years ended December 31:

 

Financial Information (in millions)

   2009     2008     2007  

Sales

      

Timber

      

Eastern

   $ 104      $ 112      $ 105   

Western

     47        78        104   

New Zealand

     8        9        13   
                        

Total Timber

     159        199        222   

Real Estate

      

Development

     3        5        37   

Rural

     32        48        79   

Non-Strategic Timberlands

     66        74        —     
                        

Total Real Estate

     101        127        116   

Performance Fibers

      

Cellulose specialties

     658        600        539   

Absorbent materials

     181        198        183   
                        

Total Performance Fibers

     839        798        722   

Wood Products

     51        86        88   

Other Operations

     38        61        77   

Intersegment Eliminations

     (19     —          —     
                        

Total Sales

   $ 1,169      $ 1,271      $ 1,225   
                        

Operating Income (Loss)

      

Timber(1)

   $ 7      $ 31      $ 60   

Real Estate

     56        80        93   

Performance Fibers

     184        149        141   

Wood Products

     (11     (7     (8

Other Operations

     (3     3        (3

Corporate and Other Expenses/Eliminations(2)

     177        (30     (36
                        

Operating Income

     410        226        247   

Interest Expense

     (53     (50     (57

Interest/Other Income

     2        2        7   

Income Tax Expense

     (46     (29     (23
                        

Net Income

   $ 313      $ 149      $ 174   
                        

 

(1)

Includes a $10.9 million charge in 2007 for losses from wildfire damage on timberlands in southeast Georgia and northeast Florida.

(2)

Results for 2009 include $205.2 related to the AFMC. See Note 3—Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit (“AFMC”) for additional information.

 

26


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Results of Operations, 2009 versus 2008

Timber

Sales (in millions)

   2008    Changes Attributable to:     2009
      Price     Volume/
Mix/Other
   

Eastern

   $ 112    $ (20   $ 12      $ 104

Western

     78      (12     (19     47

New Zealand

     9      —          (1     8
                             

Total Sales

   $ 199    $ (32   $ (8   $ 159
                             

 

Operating Income/(Loss) (in millions)

   2008     Changes Attributable to:     2009  
     Price     Volume/
Mix
    Cost/Other    

Eastern

   $ 21      $ (20   $ (5   $ 21      $ 17   

Western

     12        (12     (7     —          (7

New Zealand/Other

     (2     —          —          (1     (3
                                        

Total Operating Income

   $ 31      $ (32   $ (12   $ 20      $ 7   
                                        

In the Eastern region, sales and operating income decreased due to weaker sawlog markets and a sales mix shift from sawtimber to lower-priced pulpwood, which continued to have solid demand. The impact of the 18 percent decline in pine stumpage prices and six percent decline in overall volumes was partially offset by lower depletion and logging costs as well as an increase in other income such as recreational licenses.

In the Western region, sales and operating income decreased as weak demand and planned harvest reductions negatively impacted prices and volumes. Delivered sawlog prices and overall volumes declined 21 percent and 29 percent from the prior year, respectively. While logging costs improved in the Western region, the benefit was mostly offset by higher depletion expense related to a second quarter 2008 timberland acquisition.

In February 2010, our New Zealand joint venture, Matariki Forestry Group (“Matariki”), sold a 35 percent interest in the joint venture to a new investor for NZ$167 million. The investment is for newly issued capital by Matariki which was used entirely to pay down a portion of the outstanding NZ$367 million debt. The transaction reduced our ownership interest in Matariki from 40 percent to 26 percent. Rayonier will continue to manage the joint venture.

Real Estate

Our HBU real estate holdings are primarily in the southeastern U.S. We segregate these real estate holdings into three groups: HBU development, HBU rural and non-strategic timberlands. Our strategy is to extract maximum value from our HBU properties. We pursue entitlement activity on development property while maintaining a rural HBU program of sales for conservation, recreation and industrial uses.

 

      2008    Changes Attributable to:    2009

Sales (in millions)

      Price     Volume/
Mix
  

Development

   $ 5    $ (5   $ 3    $ 3

Rural

     48      (16     —        32

Non-Strategic Timberlands

     74      (13     5      66
                            

Total Sales

   $ 127    $ (34   $ 8    $ 101
                            

 

Operating Income (in millions)

   2008    Changes Attributable to:    2009
      Price     Volume/
Mix
   Cost/Other   

Total Operating Income

   $ 80    $ (34   $ 9    $ 1    $ 56
                                   

 

27


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Sales and operating income declined from the prior year due to lower per acre prices primarily driven by soft markets and geographic mix. Average rural prices declined $997 per acre, or 33 percent, from the prior year while average non-strategic timberlands prices declined $247 per acre, or 17 percent, from their 2008 peak. Non-strategic timberland sales volumes rose eight percent.

Performance Fibers

Sales (in millions)

   2008    Changes Attributable to:     2009
      Price     Volume/
Mix
   

Cellulose specialties

   $ 600    $ 68      $ (10   $ 658

Absorbent materials

     198      (28     11        181
                             

Total Sales

   $ 798    $ 40      $ 1      $ 839
                             

Sales increased five percent from 2008 largely due to higher cellulose specialties prices which, on average, rose $147 per ton, or 12 percent, reflecting strong market demand and a cost-related surcharge that was in effect for the first six months of the year. Cellulose specialties volume declined two percent from the prior year primarily due to the timing of customer orders and lower production volumes.

Average prices in absorbent materials decreased $104 per ton, or 14 percent, from the prior year due to weaker markets while volumes increased due to improved production as the 2008 results were impacted by unplanned maintenance outages.

 

Operating Income (in millions)

   2008    Changes Attributable to:     2009
      Price    Volume/
Mix
    Cost/Other    

Total Operating Income

   $ 149    $ 40    $ (2   $ (3   $ 184
                                    

In 2009, operating income improved from 2008 as higher sales prices more than offset higher production costs and the impact of sales mix shift.

Wood Products

Sales (in millions)

   2008    Changes Attributable to:     2009
      Price     Volume    

Total Sales

   $ 86    $ (9   $ (26   $ 51
                             

 

Operating Loss (in millions)

   2008     Changes Attributable to:    2009  
     Price     Costs   

Total Operating Loss

   $ (7   $ (9   $ 5    $ (11
                               

Sales declined and operating loss increased from the prior year due to the weak housing market and increased production curtailments, offset partially by lower wood costs. Prices and volumes declined 16 percent and 30 percent from the prior year, respectively.

Other Operations

Sales decreased $23 million from 2008 primarily reflecting lower trading. Operating income declined $6 million as foreign exchange losses were recorded in 2009 while foreign exchange gains were recognized in 2008.

Corporate and Other Expense/Eliminations

Corporate and Other Expense includes $205 million for earnings related to the AFMC. Excluding the impact of the AFMC, corporate and other expenses were $28 million in 2009, a $2 million decline from 2008 as an insurance recovery more than offset higher stock-based and other incentive compensation.

 

28


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Intersegment eliminations increased from 2008 primarily reflecting higher sales from our Timber segment to our Performance Fibers segment.

Interest and Other Income/Expense

Interest and other income/expense in 2009 was $3 million above the prior year as higher average debt balances more than offset lower interest rates. In August 2009, we issued $172.5 million of 4.50% Senior Exchangeable Notes due in 2015, with approximately $138 million of the proceeds used to retire debt, including $122 million of 8.39% installment notes that matured in December 2009.

Income Tax Expense

Our 2009 effective tax rate before discrete items was 21.6 percent compared to 15.0 percent in 2008. The increase was due to proportionately higher earnings from the TRS. Including discrete items, the effective tax rate was 12.9 percent compared to 16.5 percent in 2008.

See Note 10 — Income Taxes for additional information regarding the provision for income taxes.

Outlook for 2010

We are encouraged by recent timber price improvement and continued strength in pulpwood demand. In Real Estate, we expect increased interest in rural, conservation and non-strategic properties. In Performance Fibers, we anticipate continued solid demand for cellulose specialties and absorbent materials.

Accordingly, we expect this year’s Timber and Real Estate results to exceed 2009 and Performance Fibers’ results to be comparable. Overall, we anticipate earnings and cash available for distribution to be above 2009 which, along with our strong balance sheet and significant liquidity, position us well for future growth opportunities.

Results of Operations, 2008 versus 2007

Timber

 

Sales (in millions)

   2007    Changes Attributable to:     2008
      Price     Volume/
Mix/Other
   

Eastern

   $ 105    $ (11   $ 18      $ 112

Western

     104      (24     (2     78

New Zealand

     13      —          (4     9
                             

Total Sales

   $ 222    $ (35   $ 12      $ 199
                             

In 2008, timber sales decreased $23 million, or ten percent, from the prior year primarily due to the results in the Western region as sawlog prices declined due to the weak housing market and an oversupply of salvaged timber from a December 2007 storm.

In the Eastern region, volumes improved by 11 percent from 2007 as a result of strong pulpwood demand which more than offset lower average prices due to the weak sawlog market and a shift in sales mix to lower priced pulpwood.

 

Operating Income/(Loss) (in millions)

   2007    Changes Attributable to:     2008  
      Price     Volume/
Cost
    Other    

Eastern(1)

   $ 9    $ (11   $ 19      $ 4      $ 21   

Western

     49      (24     (13     —          12   

New Zealand/Other

     2      —          (1     (3     (2
                                       

Total Operating Income

   $ 60    $ (35   $ 5      $ 1      $ 31   
                                       

 

(1)

2007 included a $10.9 million charge for wildfires on timberlands in southeast Georgia and northeast Florida.

 

29


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Operating income decreased from the prior year due to depressed sawlog prices and the impact of salvaged timber in the Western region. Excluding the 2007 fire losses, costs increased mostly from higher depletion expense in the Western region related to a second quarter timberlands acquisition. The 2008 results also include higher other income in the Eastern region resulting from improved recreational license profits.

Real Estate

 

Sales (in millions)

   2007    Changes Attributable to:     2008
      Price     Volume/
Mix
   

Development

   $ 37    $ 1      $ (33   $ 5

Rural

     79      (50     19        48

Non-Strategic Timberlands

     —        —          74        74
                             

Total Sales

   $ 116    $ (49   $ 60      $ 127
                             

Real estate sales improved by $11 million from the prior year. In 2008, we began selling non-strategic timberland holdings that did not meet our investment criteria. The favorable demand for non-strategic timberlands offset lower average rural prices and reduced development sales due to the weak housing market. The lower average rural prices reflect the impact of a 2007 rural sale of 3,100 acres at $15,000 per acre to an industrial buyer. Excluding the impact of the 2007 industrial buyer sale, average rural prices declined $306 per acre, or nine percent, from the prior year mostly due to a change in geographic sales mix.

 

Operating Income (in millions)

   2007    Changes Attributable to:    2008
      Price     Volume/
Mix
  

Total Operating Income

   $ 93    $ (49   $ 36    $ 80
                            

Operating income declined $13 million due to a change in sales mix from higher-margin development properties to lower-margin non-strategic timberlands.

Performance Fibers

 

Sales (in millions)

   2007    Changes Attributable to:     2008
      Price    Volume/
Mix
   

Cellulose specialties

   $ 539    $ 57    $ 4      $ 600

Absorbent materials

     183      17      (2     198
                            

Total Sales

   $ 722    $ 74    $ 2      $ 798
                            

In 2008, sales increased $76 million from the prior year largely due to higher prices. For cellulose specialties, average prices rose $119 per ton, or approximately 10 percent, resulting from strong market demand and a cost-related surcharge for cellulose specialty shipments effective September 1, 2008. Additionally, volumes for cellulose specialties improved slightly due to timing of customer shipments.

Average prices for absorbent materials increased $68 per ton, or 10 percent, from the prior year, which more than offset lower volume due to unplanned mill outages that occurred earlier in the year.

 

Operating Income (in millions)

   2007    Changes Attributable to:     2008
      Price    Volume    Mix/Costs    

Total Operating Income

   $ 141    $ 74    $ 1    $ (67   $ 149
                                   

Operating income in 2008 improved from the prior year as higher sales prices and lower depreciation expense more than offset significant increases in wood, chemical, energy, maintenance and transportation costs and mark-to-market losses on fuel oil hedges.

 

30


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Wood Products

 

Sales (in millions)

   2007    Changes Attributable to:     2008
      Price    Volume    

Total Sales

   $ 88    $ —      $ (2   $ 86
                            

Lumber prices were comparable while volume declined two percent from the prior year as a result of continued weak demand in the housing market.

 

Operating Loss (in millions)

   2007     Changes Attributable to:    2008  
     Price    Costs   

Total Operating Loss

   $ (8   $ —      $ 1    $ (7
                              

Operating loss declined from 2007 primarily due to lower log costs resulting from weaker demand. Additionally, beginning in the fourth quarter 2008, we curtailed production due to the weak market conditions.

Other Operations

Sales decreased in 2008 reflecting reduced log sales in the northwest U.S. and the impact of the closure of our International Wood Products trading business during 2007, while operating income improved due to foreign exchange gains and the closure of the trading business in the prior year.

Corporate and Other Expenses/Eliminations

Corporate and Other Expense decreased $6 million in 2008 primarily due to lower incentive compensation expense and cost reduction measures.

Interest and Other Income/Expense

In comparison to the prior year, interest expense decreased $7 million primarily due to lower average rates and a favorable IRS settlement related to an uncertain tax position, partly offset by higher average debt balances used to partially finance strategic timberland acquisitions.

The $5 million decline in interest and other income in 2008 largely resulted from reduced average cash balances in 2008 compared to 2007.

Income Tax Expense

Our 2008 effective tax rate before discrete items was 15.0 percent compared to 13.3 percent in 2007. The increase was due to proportionately higher earnings from the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary. Including discrete items, the effective tax rate was 16.5 percent compared to 11.9 percent in 2007.

See Note 10 — Income Taxes for additional information regarding the provision for income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our operations have generally produced consistent cash flows and required limited capital resources. Short-term borrowings have helped fund cyclicality and seasonality in working capital needs and long-term debt has been used to fund major acquisitions.

Summary of Liquidity and Financing Commitments (in millions of dollars)

 

     As of December 31,  
     2009     2008     2007  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 75      $ 62      $ 181   

Total debt

     700        747        721   

Shareholders’ equity

     1,146        939        1,000   

Total capitalization (total debt plus equity)

     1,846        1,686        1,721   

Debt to capital ratio

     38     44     42

 

31


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Results, 2009 versus 2008

Cash Provided by Operating Activities (in millions of dollars)

 

     2009    2008    Decrease

Year Ended December 31,

   $ 307    $ 340    $ 33

Cash provided by operating activities decreased $33 million primarily due to lower earnings from operations as a result of weaker markets in Timber and Real Estate, partially offset by higher operating results in Performance Fibers due to strong demand.

Cash Used for Investing Activities (in millions of dollars)

 

     2009    2008    Decrease

Year ended December 31,

   $ 93    $ 330    $ 237

Cash used for investing activities decreased $237 million as 2008 included the purchase of $230 million of timberlands as well as higher capital expenditures.

Cash Used for Financing Activities (in millions of dollars)

 

     2009    2008    Increase

Year ended December 31,

   $ 202    $ 128    $ 74

Cash used for financing activities increased $74 million due to the net paydown of $40 million in debt during 2009 compared to $21 million in net borrowings during 2008, as well as costs related to the August 2009 issuance of Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2015. See Note 13 — Debt for further information on the Senior Exchangeable Notes.

Our debt-to-capital ratio decreased from prior year end as a result of lower debt and higher equity primarily from the AFMC earnings recognized during 2009. See Note 3 — Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit (“AFMC”) for additional information.

Results, 2008 versus 2007

Cash Provided by Operating Activities (in millions of dollars)

 

     2008    2007    Increase

Year Ended December 31,

   $ 340    $ 324    $ 16

The increase in cash provided by operating activities was a result of lower working capital requirements for 2008 partly offset by lower 2008 earnings. The reduction in working capital requirements resulted primarily from the timing of interest and tax payments.

Cash Used for Investing Activities (in millions of dollars)

 

     2008    2007    Increase

Year ended December 31,

   $ 330    $ 126    $ 204

Cash used for investing activities was above 2007 mainly resulting from the purchase of $230 million of timberlands in 2008 versus $23 million in 2007. See Note 7 — Timberland Acquisitions for additional information. Capital expenditures of $105 million in 2008 were above 2007 expenditures of $97 million.

Cash Used for Financing Activities (in millions of dollars)

 

     2008    2007    Increase

Year ended December 31,

   $ 128    $ 58    $ 70

The increase of $70 million was mainly due to lower net borrowings in 2008. Net borrowings increased $21 million in 2008 versus an increase of $89 million in 2007.

Our debt-to-capital ratio in 2008 increased from prior year end as a result of lower equity primarily from foreign currency translation adjustments and a decline in pension assets.

 

32


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Expected 2010 Expenditures

Capital expenditures in 2010 are forecasted to be between $140 million and $145 million. Our 2010 dividend payments are expected to increase from $158 million to $160 million assuming no change in the quarterly dividend rate of $0.50 per share. Cash payments for income taxes in 2010 are anticipated to be between $2 million and $6 million. Additionally, a cash refund of approximately $180 million related to the AFMC is anticipated to be received in 2010 after filing of the 2009 tax return. See Note 3 — Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit (“AFMC”) for additional information.

We made pension contributions of $10 million in 2009, of which $8 million was mandatory, compared to discretionary contributions of $8 million in 2008. We expect to increase pension plan contributions in 2010, primarily by using proceeds from the AFMC. These contributions could be in the $40 million to $50 million range. Expenditures of $11 million for environmental costs related to our dispositions and discontinued operations are expected in 2010. See Note 16 — Liabilities for Dispositions and Discontinued Operations for further information.

Performance and Liquidity Indicators

The discussion below is presented to enhance the reader’s understanding of our operating performance, liquidity, ability to generate cash and satisfy rating agency and creditor requirements. This information includes two measures of financial results: Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (“EBITDA”), and Adjusted Cash Available for Distribution (“Adjusted CAD”). These measures are not defined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and the discussion of EBITDA and Adjusted CAD is not intended to conflict with or change any of the GAAP disclosures described above. Management considers these measures to be important to estimate the enterprise and shareholder values of the Company as a whole and of its core segments, and for allocating capital resources. In addition, analysts, investors and creditors use these measures when analyzing our operating performance, financial condition and cash generating ability. Management uses EBITDA as a performance measure and Adjusted CAD as a liquidity measure. EBITDA is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Adjusted CAD as defined, however, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Below is a reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA for the five years ended December 31, 2009 (in millions of dollars):

 

     2009    2008    2007    2006    2005  

Net Income

   $ 312.5    $ 148.6    $ 173.6    $ 176.5    $ 177.5   

Income tax expense (benefit)

     46.3      29.4      23.4      22.3      (30.6

Interest, net

     50.4      48.3      49.6      38.8      38.8   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     158.4      168.2      165.1      136.5      153.3   
                                    

EBITDA(1)

   $ 567.6    $ 394.5    $ 411.7    $ 374.1    $ 339.0   
                                    

 

(1)

2009 includes $205.2 million related to the AFMC.

EBITDA by segment is a critical valuation measure used by our Chief Operating Decision Maker, existing shareholders and potential shareholders to measure how management is performing relative to the assets with which they have been entrusted. EBITDA by segment was as follows for the five years ended December 31 (millions of dollars):

 

     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  

EBITDA by Segment

          

Timber

   $ 77.0      $ 115.6      $ 145.8      $ 151.9      $ 147.1   

Real Estate

     80.2        101.4        97.8        90.6        68.1   

Performance Fibers

     242.1        204.8        209.4        152.8        121.4   

Wood Products

     (6.3     (0.7     (2.3     4.1        (11.9

Other Operations

     (3.0     3.0        (3.2     1.9        1.6   

Corporate and other(1)

     177.6        (29.6     (35.8     (27.2     12.7   
                                        

EBITDA(1)

   $ 567.6      $ 394.5      $ 411.7      $ 374.1      $ 339.0   
                                        

 

(1) 2009 includes $205.2 million related to the AFMC.

 

33


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

In 2009, EBITDA was $568 million, a $173 million increase from 2008 primarily due to the AFMC and higher operating results in our Performance Fibers segment, partially offset by lower operating results in our Timber and Real Estate segments. In 2008, EBITDA was $395 million, a $17 million decrease from 2007 primarily due to lower operating results in our Timber segment. See page 20 of Item 6 — Selected Financial Data for a reconciliation of EBITDA to Operating Income.

Adjusted CAD is a non-GAAP measure of cash generated during a period which is available for dividend distribution, repurchasing common shares, debt reduction and for strategic acquisitions net of associated financing (e.g. realizing LKE tax benefits). We define Cash Available for Distribution (“CAD”) as Cash Provided by Operating Activities adjusted for capital spending, the tax benefits associated with certain strategic acquisitions, the change in committed cash, and other items which include cash provided by discontinued operations, proceeds from matured energy forward contracts and the change in capital expenditures purchased on account. Committed cash represents outstanding checks that have been drawn on our zero balance bank accounts but have not been paid. In compliance with SEC requirements for non-GAAP measures, we reduce CAD by mandatory debt repayments which results in the measure entitled “Adjusted CAD.”

Below is a reconciliation of Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Adjusted CAD for the five years ended December 31 (in millions):

 

     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  

Cash provided by operating activities

   $ 307.3      $ 340.2      $ 324.0      $ 306.9      $ 261.9   

Capital expenditures

     (91.7     (104.8     (97.0     (105.5     (85.3

LKE tax benefits on third party real estate sales(1)

     —          (12.1     (3.9     (4.8     (3.2

Change in committed cash

     17.0        (10.0     16.9        (19.1     1.8   

Other

     (2.4     (0.1     0.8        0.3        (14.7
                                        

CAD

     230.2        213.2        240.8        177.8        160.5   

Mandatory debt repayments

     (122.6     (23.9     (162.9     (3.3     (3.6
                                        

Adjusted CAD

   $ 107.6      $ 189.3      $ 77.9      $ 174.5      $ 156.9   
                                        

 

(1)

Represents income taxes which would have been paid had the Company not completed third-party LKE transactions.

Adjusted CAD was $108 million in 2009, a $81 million decrease from 2008 primarily due to higher mandatory debt repayments. Adjusted CAD was $189 million in 2008, a $111 million increase from 2007 primarily due to $163 million in mandatory debt repayments in 2007 compared to $24 million in 2008. Adjusted CAD generated in any period is not necessarily indicative of the amounts that may be generated in future periods.

Liquidity Facilities

We have a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 40 basis points. The facility expires in August 2011. At December 31, 2009, the available borrowing capacity was $235 million.

In August 2009, TRS issued $172.5 million of 4.50% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2015. See Note 13 — Debt for additional information on this offering and other outstanding debt, as well as for information on covenants which must be met in connection with our installment notes and the $250 million revolving credit facility.

In February 2010, S&P Ratings Services revised its outlook on Rayonier to positive from stable while affirming a ‘BBB’ investment grade rating of our long-term debt. Moody’s Investors Service affirmed its ‘Baa3’ investment grade rating on our long-term debt with a ‘Stable’ outlook.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We utilize off-balance sheet arrangements to provide credit support for certain suppliers/vendors and customers in case of their default on critical obligations, and collateral for certain self-insurance programs that we maintain. These arrangements consist of standby letters of credit and surety bonds. As part of our ongoing operations, we also periodically issue guarantees to third parties. Off-balance sheet arrangements are not considered a source of liquidity or capital resources and do not expose us to material risks or material unfavorable financial impacts. See Note 18 — Guarantees for further discussion.

 

34


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

Contractual Financial Obligations

In addition to using cash flow from operations, we finance our operations through the issuance of debt, and by entering into leases. These financial obligations are recorded in accordance with accounting rules applicable to the underlying transaction, with the result that some are recorded as liabilities on the Balance Sheet, while others are required to be disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

The following table aggregates our contractual financial obligations as of December 31, 2009 and anticipated cash spending by period:

 

Contractual Financial Obligations (000’s)

   Total    Payments Due by Period
      2010    2011-2012    2013-2014    Thereafter

Long-term debt(1)

   $ 726,167    $ —      $ 426,167    $ 112,500    $ 187,500

Current maturities of long-term debt

     4,650      4,650      —        —        —  

Interest payments on long-term debt(2)

     150,067      37,558      66,941      35,718      9,850

Operating leases — timberland(3)

     101,021      7,288      14,186      13,622      65,925

Environmental obligations(4)

     67,300      25,282      29,918      12,000      100

Postretirement obligations(5)

     16,677      2,278      3,475      3,377      7,547

Operating leases — PP&E, offices

     8,298      3,109      2,368      1,546      1,275

Uncertain tax positions(6)

     1,973      1,973      —        —        —  

Other long-term liabilities

     947      237      473      237      —  
                                  

Total contractual cash obligations

   $ 1,077,100    $ 82,375    $ 543,528    $ 179,000    $ 272,197
                                  

 

(1)

Due to the adoption of new guidance related to accounting for convertible debt instruments, the book value of our long-term debt is currently recorded at $695 million on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, but upon maturity the liability will be $726 million.

(2)

Projected interest payments for variable-rate debt were calculated based on outstanding principal amounts and interest rates as of December 31, 2009.

(3)

The majority of timberland leases are subject to changes in either the Consumer Price Index or the Producer Price Index.

(4)

These obligations relate to the Jesup mill 2008 consent order. See the Item 3 — Legal Proceedings for additional information on the Jesup mill consent order.

(5)

The amounts represent an estimate of our projected payments related to postretirement medical and life insurance plans for the next ten years. See Note 21 — Employee Benefit Plans for additional information.

(6)

The settlement date is unknown for approximately $16 million of uncertain tax positions. This amount has been excluded from the table above. See Note 10 — Income Taxes for additional information on uncertain tax positions.

In November 2009, we completed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement related to $172.5 million of new public convertible debt securities sold in a private placement on August 12, 2009. In January 2008, we completed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement related to $300 million of new public convertible debt securities sold in a private placement on October 16, 2007. In May 2004, we completed a Form S-4 acquisition shelf registration to offer and issue 7.0 million common shares for the acquisition of other businesses, assets or properties. As of December 31, 2009, no common shares have been offered or issued under the Form S-4 shelf registration.

New Accounting Standards

See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements that will affect our financial results and disclosures in future periods.

Environmental Regulation

Rayonier is subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations concerning air emissions, water discharges and waste handling and disposal. Such environmental laws and regulations include the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state laws and regulations. Management closely monitors its environmental responsibilities and believes that the Company is in substantial compliance with current environmental requirements. In addition to ongoing

 

35


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

compliance with laws and regulations, the Company’s facilities operate in accordance with various permits, which are issued by state and federal environmental agencies. Many of these permits impose operating conditions on the Company which require significant expenditures to ensure compliance. Upon renewal and renegotiation of these permits, the issuing agencies often seek to impose new or additional conditions in response to new environmental laws and regulations, or more stringent interpretations of existing laws and regulations. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we spent approximately $10 million, $18 million and $11 million, respectively, for capital projects related to environmental compliance for ongoing operations. During 2010 and 2011, our capital spending related to environmental compliance for continuing operations is expected to increase to approximately $28 million and $26 million, respectively. Over the next five years we expect environmental capital spending to total between $90 million and $95 million. The expected increase in environmental spending is primarily due to a 2008 Jesup mill consent order (in which we agreed to implement certain capital improvements relating to the mill’s wastewater treatment) as well as improvement to our manufacturing process and pollution control systems that will comply with the requirements of new or renewed air emission and water discharge permits, and other required improvements for our Performance Fibers mills.

Our discontinued operations with historical environmental contamination are subject to a number of federal, state, and local laws. For example, former operations at the SWP wood treating sites used preservative formulations consisting primarily of creosote, pentachlorophenol, and chromated-copper arsenate. Investigations performed at the SWP sites over the years have identified releases to soils, groundwater and sediments containing free product and constituents or derivatives of these formulations including, but not limited to, all or some combination of petroleum products, metals (e.g., arsenic, chromium), and/or organics (e.g., volatile organic compounds, phenols, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins and furans). As it has for many years, SWP continues to actively work with federal and state environmental agencies to undertake appropriate steps to investigate and remediate these sites in accordance with applicable laws. As these requirements change over time, they may mandate more stringent levels of soil and groundwater investigation, remediation, and monitoring. While we believe that our current estimates are adequate, future changes to these legal requirements could adversely affect the cost and timing of our activities on these sites.

Notwithstanding Rayonier’s current compliance status, many of its operations are subject to constantly changing environmental requirements which are often the result of legislation, regulation, litigation and negotiation. For additional information see page 7 in Item 1A — Risk Factors for a discussion of the impact of environmental laws and regulations, including climate-related initiatives, on our businesses.

It is the opinion of management that substantial expenditures will be required over the next ten years in the area of environmental compliance. See Note 16 — Liabilities for Dispositions and Discontinued Operations, for additional information regarding the Company’s environmental liabilities.

 

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market and Other Economic Risks

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates, commodity prices and foreign exchange rates. Our objective is to minimize the economic impact of these market risks. We use derivatives in accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. Derivatives are managed by a senior executive committee whose responsibilities include initiating, managing and monitoring resulting exposures. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Cyclical pricing of commodity market paper pulp is one of the factors which influences Performance Fibers’ prices in the absorbent materials product line. However, since we are a non-integrated producer of specialized performance fibers for non-papermaking end uses, our fluff product mix tends to lag (on both the upturn and downturn) commodity paper pulp prices with pricing adjustments that are less severe. Our cellulose specialty products’ prices are based on market supply and demand and are not correlated to commodity paper pulp prices. Also, nearly all of our cellulose specialty products are under long-term volume contracts that extend into 2011.

We periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate changes. These swaps involve the exchange of fixed and variable interest rate payments without exchanging principal amounts. At December 31, 2009, we did not hold any swap agreements.

 

36


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

The fair market value of our long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk. However, we intend to hold most of our debt until maturity. The estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt at December 31, 2009, was $747 million compared to $651 million in carrying value. We use interest rates of debt with similar terms and maturities to estimate the fair value of our debt. Our percentage of debt with fixed interest rates was 93 percent as of December 31, 2009. Generally, the fair market value of fixed-rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. A hypothetical one-percentage point increase/decrease in prevailing interest rates at December 31, 2009, would result in a corresponding decrease/increase in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt of approximately $33 million.

We periodically enter into commodity forward contracts to fix some of our fuel oil and natural gas costs. The forward contracts partially mitigate the risk of a change in Performance Fibers margins resulting from an increase or decrease in these energy costs. At December 31, 2009, we had no fuel oil or natural gas contracts outstanding.

 

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See Index to Financial Statements on page ii.

 

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

 

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Rayonier management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this annual report on Form 10-K, is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no control evaluation can provide absolute assurance that all control exceptions and instances of fraud have been prevented or detected on a timely basis. Even systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance that their objectives are achieved.

Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

With regard to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as defined in paragraph (f) of Rule 13a-15(f), see Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on page F-1, followed by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on pages F-2 and F-3, included in Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this annual report on Form 10-K.

In the quarter ended December 31, 2009, based upon the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that would materially affect or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Paul G. Kirk, Jr. was elected to Rayonier Inc.’s Board of Directors and reappointed Lead Director effective March 1, 2010. Mr. Kirk resigned from the Board on September 23, 2009 to serve as interim United States Senator from Massachusetts. His Senate term ended on February 4, 2010. Mr. Kirk is expected to be appointed to one or more Board committees upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and approval by the Board of Directors in May.

 

37


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

PART III

Certain information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”). We will make the Proxy Statement available on our Web site at www.rayonier.com as soon as it is filed with the SEC.

 

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this Item with respect to directors is incorporated by reference to the information in the sections entitled “Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance,” “Executive Officers” and “Report of the Audit Committee” in the Proxy Statement. The information required by this Item with respect to disclosure of any known late filing or failure by an insider to file a report required by Section 16 of the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement.

Our Standard of Ethics and Code of Corporate Conduct, which is applicable to our principal executive officer and financial and accounting officer, is available on our Web site, www.rayonier.com. Recent amendments to the Standards of Ethics and Code of Corporate Conduct have been posted on our Web site. Any other amendments to or waivers of the Standard of Ethics and Code of Corporate Conduct will also be disclosed on such Web site.

 

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information called for by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference from the section and subsections entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Summary Compensation Table,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “Pension Benefits,” “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” “Director Compensation” and “Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation; Processes and Procedures” in the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information called for by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from the subsections entitled “Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,” “Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information called for by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from the section and subsections entitled “Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance — Director Independence” and “Corporate Governance — Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information called for by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the subsection entitled “Report of the Audit Committee — Information Regarding Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.

 

38


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

PART IV

 

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents filed as a part of this report:

 

  (1)

See Index to Financial Statements on page ii for a list of the financial statements filed as part of this report.

 

  (2)

See Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. All other financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, the required matter is not present or the required information has otherwise been supplied in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

 

  (3)

See Exhibit Index for a list of the exhibits filed or incorporated herein as part of this report. Exhibits that are incorporated by reference to documents filed previously by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are filed with the SEC under File No. 1-6780.

(b) Exhibits:

See Item 15 (a)(3).

(c) Financial Statement Schedules:

See Item 15 (a)(2).

 

39


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To Our Shareholders:

The management of Rayonier Inc. and its subsidiaries is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our system of internal controls over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Rayonier Inc.’s management, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, we used the framework included in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. The report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, is on page F-3.

LOGO

L.M. Thomas

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

February 24, 2010

LOGO

H. E. Vanden Noort

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 24, 2010

 

F-1


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Rayonier Inc.

Jacksonville, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rayonier Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rayonier Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

LOGO

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Jacksonville, Florida

February 24, 2010

 

F-2


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Rayonier Inc.

Jacksonville, Florida

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Rayonier Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company and our report dated February 24, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

LOGO

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Jacksonville, Florida

February 24, 2010

 

F-3


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

RAYONIER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Years Ended December 31,

(Thousands of dollars, except per share data)

 

     2009     2008     2007  

SALES

   $ 1,168,567      $ 1,271,048      $ 1,224,654   
                        

Costs and Expenses

      

Cost of sales (2007 includes a $10.9 million fire loss)

     914,772        991,894        922,148   

Selling and general expenses

     62,633        64,503        66,941   

Other operating income, net (Note 3)

     (221,172     (12,500     (10,516
                        
     756,233        1,043,897        978,573   

Equity in (loss) income of New Zealand joint venture

     (2,826     (715     514   
                        

OPERATING INCOME

     409,508        226,436        246,595   

Interest expense

     (52,441     (50,729     (57,448

Interest and miscellaneous income, net

     1,810        2,312        7,762   
                        

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

     358,877        178,019        196,909   

Income tax expense

     (46,336     (29,436     (23,350
                        

NET INCOME

     312,541        148,583        173,559   
                        

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

      

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     15,980        (23,508     7,005   

Joint venture cash flow hedges

     (2,305     —          —     

Employee Benefit Plans

      

Retiree benefit plan amendment, net of income tax expense of $7,662 in 2008

     —          16,377        —     

Gain (loss) from amortization of pension and postretirement plans, net of income tax expense of $1,401, and a tax benefit of $27,120 and $2,319

     4,879        (65,527     (3,997
                        

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

   $ 331,095      $ 75,925      $ 176,567   
                        

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

      

Basic earnings per share

   $ 3.95      $ 1.89      $ 2.24   
                        

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 3.91      $ 1.87      $ 2.20   
                        

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-4


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

RAYONIER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31,

(Thousands of dollars)

 

     2009     2008  
ASSETS   

CURRENT ASSETS

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 74,964      $ 61,685   

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,150 and $1,130

     103,740        75,657   

Inventory (Note 12)

     88,504        96,866   

Income tax and alternative fuel mixture credit receivable

     192,579        1,886   

Prepaid and other current assets

     49,909        42,929   
                

Total current assets

     509,696        279,023   
                

TIMBER AND TIMBERLANDS, NET OF DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION

     1,188,559        1,254,978   

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

    

Land

     24,789        24,445   

Buildings

     126,443        124,174   

Machinery and equipment

     1,275,955        1,244,946   
                

Total property, plant and equipment

     1,427,187        1,393,565   

Less—accumulated depreciation

     (1,082,248     (1,042,756
                
     344,939        350,809   
                

INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE (NOTE 8)

     50,999        42,950   

OTHER ASSETS

     158,738        154,104   
                
   $ 2,252,931      $ 2,081,864   
                
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   

CURRENT LIABILITIES

    

Accounts payable

   $ 58,584      $ 70,714   

Bank loans and current maturities

     4,650        620   

Accrued taxes

     11,994        10,633   

Accrued payroll and benefits

     23,764        19,854   

Accrued interest

     6,512        4,202   

Accrued customer incentives

     25,644        13,936   

Accrued professional fees

     10,483        749   

Other current liabilities

     22,832        30,699   

Current liabilities for dispositions and discontinued operations (Note 16)

     10,648        8,214   
                

Total current liabilities

     175,111        159,621   
                

LONG-TERM DEBT

     694,999        746,591   

NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES FOR DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Note 16)

     87,943        96,361   

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Note 21)

     111,662        121,440   

OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

     37,010        18,914   

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 17, 18 and 19)

    

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Common Shares, 120,000,000 shares authorized, 79,541,974 and 78,814,431 shares issued and outstanding

     561,962        527,302   

Retained earnings

     663,986        509,931   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (79,742     (98,296
                
     1,146,206        938,937   
                
   $ 2,252,931      $ 2,081,864   
                

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-5


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

RAYONIER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31,

(Thousands of dollars)

 

<
     2009     2008     2007  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

      

Net income

   $ 312,541      $ 148,583      $ 173,559   

Non-cash items included in income:

      

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     158,371        168,239        154,686   

Non-cash cost of forest fire losses

     —          —          10,411   

Non-cash cost of real estate sold

     7,634        11,145        8,612   

Non-cash stock-based incentive compensation expense

     15,754        13,344        13,478   

Amortization of convertible debt discount

     6,517        5,437        1,119   

Non-cash change in deferred income taxes

     (6,260     11,576        (8,866

Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation

     (2,720     (3,248     (7,907

Other

     11,080        6,255        7,120   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

      

Receivables

     (26,863     1,794        19,239   

Inventories

     9,202        (15,946     (7,370

Accounts payable

     (12,552     6,128        (8,502

Income tax and alternative fuel mixture credit receivable

     (190,694     9,513        (1,251

Other current assets

     (3,793     (4,383     2,536   

Accrued liabilities

     28,317        (7,245     (10,353

Other assets

     1,422        4,736        (7,659

Other non-current liabilities

     7,438        (8,080     (6,257

Expenditures for dispositions and discontinued operations

     (8,095     (7,660     (8,575
                        

CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

     307,299        340,188        324,020   
                        

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

      

Capital expenditures

     (91,667     (104,806     (97,004

Purchase of timberlands and wood chipping facilities

     —          (229,701     (22,872

Purchase of real estate

     —          (4,336     (4,350

Change in restricted cash

     1,399        8,523        (8,812

Other

     (2,476     (71     7,053   
                        

CASH USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES

     (92,744     (330,391     (125,985
                        

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

      

Issuance of debt (Note 13)

     267,500        173,800        477,000   

Repayment of debt

     (307,643     (152,685     (387,926

Dividends paid

     (158,218     (156,978     (150,626

Proceeds from the issuance of common shares

     11,115        8,265        18,891   

Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation

     2,720        3,248        7,907   

Purchase of exchangeable note hedge (Note 13)

     (23,460     —          (33,480

Proceeds from issuance of warrant (Note 13)

     12,506        —          20,670   

Debt issuance costs

     (4,678     —          (7,057

Repurchase of common shares

     (1,388     (3,979     (3,150
                        

CASH USED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES

     (201,546     (128,329     (57,771
                        

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH

     270        (864     646   
                        

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

      

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     13,279        (119,396     140,910   

Balance, beginning of year

     61,685        181,081        40,171   
                        

Balance, end of year

   $ 74,964      $ 61,685      $ 181,081