Red Hat 10-K 2008
Documents found in this filing:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Annual Report Pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 001-33162
RED HAT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1801 Varsity Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 31, 2007 was approximately $2.7 billion based on the closing price of $19.45 of our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on August 31, 2007. For purposes of the immediately preceding sentence, the term affiliate consists of each director, executive officer and greater than 10% stockholders of the registrant. There were 190,631,015 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 25, 2008.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Red Hat, Inc.s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and delivered to stockholders in connection with its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on August 14, 2008 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. With the exception of the portions of the Proxy Statement expressly incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference, such documents shall not be deemed filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
We are a global leader in providing open source software solutions to the enterprise, including our core enterprise operating system platform, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, our enterprise middleware platform, JBoss Enterprise Middleware, and other Red Hat enterprise technologies. We employ an open source software development and licensing model that uses the collaborative input of an international community of contributors to develop and enhance software. We actively participate in this community-oriented development process, often in a leadership role, and leverage it to create our Red Hat- and JBoss-branded enterprise technologies.
We believe the open source development and licensing models offer significant advantages over the proprietary software development and licensing models both for Red Hat and our customers. Through the open source development model, we leverage the community of developers and users, whose collective resources and knowledge supplement the developers we employ. As a result, we believe we are able to offer functionality enhancements and upgrades more quickly and with less development cost than is typical of proprietary software vendors. In turn, our customers are able to take advantage of the quality and value of open source software, which we help develop, aggregate, integrate, test, certify, deliver, maintain and support for their enterprise use.
The collectively developed software is distributed under open source licenses, such as the GNU General Public License and GNU Lesser General Public License, permitting access to the human-readable software source code. These licenses also provide broader rights for licensees to use, modify and distribute open source software than is typical in a proprietary software model. This affords broad latitude for our customers to inspect, suggest changes, customize or enhance the software if they so choose.
Red Hats participation in the community-driven development process is illustrated by Red Hats sponsorship role in the Fedora Project and the JBoss.org communities. Our participation in the Fedora Project and the JBoss.org communities enables us to leverage the efforts of this international community, which we believe allows us to reduce both cost and development time, and lower the risk of including products and features in our technologies that the market and the community will not accept and support. Thus, we are able to use the Fedora Project and the JBoss.org communities as proving grounds and virtual laboratories for new technology that we can draw upon for inclusion in our enterprise technologies. Additionally, the open and transparent nature of these projects provides our clients and potential clients with access and insights to the direction of these projects.
We offer a choice of operating system platforms for servers, work stations and desktops that support multiple application areas, including the data center, edge-of-the-network applications, information technology infrastructure (applications such as database, ERP and large web servers), corporate desktop and technical/developer workstation. Our most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RHEL 5 offers additional technology enhancements, including integrated virtualization.
JBoss Enterprise Middleware delivers a range of middleware products for developing, deploying, integrating and managing distributed composite and web-based applications. JBoss Enterprise Middleware is based on the Java programming language that enables the deployment of service-oriented architectures. JBoss Enterprise Middleware provides an application infrastructure for building and deploying distributed applications that are accessible via the Internet, corporate intranets, extranets and virtual private networks. Examples of applications deployed on JBoss Enterprise Middleware include hotel and airline reservations, online banking, credit card processing, securities trading, healthcare systems, customer and partner portals, retail and point of sale systems and telecommunications network infrastructure.
Our integrated management services, Red Hat Network (RHN), JBoss Operating Network (JBoss ON) and JBoss Customer Support Portal (JBoss Support Portal), permit these Red Hat enterprise technologies to be
updated and configured and the performance of these and other technologies to be monitored and managed in an automated fashion. Our suite of training and other professional service offerings also enable enterprise customers to leverage the performance and scalability benefits of our enterprise technologies in their environments.
We also provide other infrastructure enterprise technologies, including technologies for assisting software development, providing higher availability clustering of systems and services, scalable authentication and directory services.
We intend to continue to expand capabilities available under our open source architecture to help meet the performance, security, reliability and scalability requirements critical to the enterprise. With the acquisition of MetaMatrix and other technologies in fiscal 2008, we expanded our middleware and application development offerings. By providing an expanded portfolio of open source, service-oriented tools for enterprises of all sizes, our goal is to enable our customers to reduce costs and derive increased value from all aspects of their infrastructure investments. We believe that the adoption of our enterprise technologies, as mission-critical platforms, represents a significant shift in the computing industry.
In addition to our development and licensing models, we believe that our business model differentiates Red Hat from the typical proprietary software company. We provide Red Hat enterprise technologies under annual or multi-year subscriptions. Through the life of a subscription, a customer is entitled to specified levels of support as well as security updates, bug fixes, functionality enhancements and upgrades to the technology, when and if available, via our integrated management technologies (i.e., RHN, JBoss Support Portal and JBoss ON), generally without additional charges. This business model allows the customer access to consistent improvements and innovation of our product base and to purchase the technologies and services it needs for the duration that it needs them.
We sell Red Hat enterprise technologies through both direct and indirect channels of distribution. We sell directly to customers through our sales force and our web store. Our indirect sales channel includes distributors and resellers, telecom/network technology companies, and independent software vendors (ISVs). In addition, leading global server and workstation hardware vendors support and pre-load Red Hat enterprise technologies on various servers and workstations and also sell their hardware together with Red Hat Enterprise Linux as part of pre-configured solutions. Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JBoss Enterprise Middleware technologies also have gained widespread support from many of the leading ISVs and independent hardware vendors (IHVs) of server and workstation hardware to the enterprise. With the support and tools we make available, many of these companies have engineered and certified that their offerings run on or with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JBoss Enterprise Middleware technologies or, in the case of some ISVs, have built their products using JBoss Enterprise Middleware. We believe widespread support from these companies helps market acceptance and adoption of our enterprise technologies. See NOTE 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The benefits of the open source development model are becoming more well-recognized and the acceptance of open source software is continuing to grow. We see this growth both in the number of Linux server operating systems in use today, the increasing number of JBoss Enterprise Middleware deployments and the substantial level of investment by venture capitalists in open source based startup companies worldwide and recent acquisitions of open source software companies.
In 2007, we expanded our middleware offerings through the acquisition of MetaMatrix, a leading provider of enterprise data management software, and through our acquisition of a service logic execution environment that facilitates voice, video and data in next-generation applications.
Red Hat, Inc. was incorporated in Connecticut in March 1993 as ACC Corp., Inc., which subsequently changed its name to Red Hat Software, Inc. Red Hat Software, Inc. reincorporated in Delaware in September 1998 and changed its name to Red Hat, Inc. in June 1999. Except as otherwise indicated, all references in this report to we, us, our, the Company, the registrant, or Red Hat refers to Red Hat, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Origins of open source software
The open source software development model originated in academic and research environments. The model is based on the collaborative development of the softwares source code, the human-readable code that is used to develop software. Whether individually or in groups, and regardless of location, participating developers, many of whose projects are commercially funded, make their code available over the Internet, give and receive comments on open source code and modify it accordingly. This development model gives open source software an inherent level of transparency and choice that contrasts with the proprietary software development model.
Under the proprietary model of software development, a software vendor generally develops the code itself or acquires components from other vendors, without the input from a wider community of participants. The vendor generally licenses the user only the machine-readable binary (or object) code, with no or limited rights to copy, modify or redistribute that code, and does not make the source code available to the user or other developers. Moreover, peer review and enhancements are not readily possible given that binary code consists of the 1s and 0s that only computers understand. In contrast, under the open source development model, the software vendor provides users and other developers with access both to the binary code and the source code and permits the user to copy, modify and redistribute the code to others.
The growth of the Internet has greatly increased the scale and efficiency of open source software development through the availability of collaborative technologies such as email lists, news groups and websites. These technologies have enabled large communities of independent developers, located around the world, to collaborate on more complex open source projects.
We believe that open source software is a viable and arguably superior alternative to traditional proprietary software. As compared to the proprietary model, the open source model:
Moreover, we believe open source software offers many potential benefits for software customers and vendors. Not only are customers able to take advantage of the quality and value of open source software, but they can inspect and help diagnose problems easily, and they also may choose to customize the software to suit their particular needs. Vendors are able to leverage the community of open source developers, reducing development costs, decreasing time to market and mitigating the risks associated with developing new software solutions.
Challenges to the widespread adoption of open source by the large enterprise
Despite a strong initial market acceptance of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, JBoss Enterprise Middleware and other Red Hat enterprise technologies by the large enterprise, a number of obstacles exist to the continued growth and adoption of these technologies within the enterprise, including:
RED HAT BUSINESS MODEL
We ordinarily offer and provide our enterprise technologies with related services to our customers in the form of annual or multi-year subscriptions. Our subscription model is designed to provide customers with an all-inclusive software solution, incorporating product delivery, problem resolution, ongoing corrections, enhancements and new versions, certified compatibility with a portfolio of hardware and software applications and Red Hats Open Source Assurance program. We believe that the chief information officers of large enterprises select Red Hat enterprise technologies and choose to pay on a subscription basis because of the business value and fast innovation that we provide, in contrast to traditional proprietary technology. We believe the success of our business model is influenced by the acceptance and widespread deployment of open source solutions by small, medium and large enterprises, our ability to generate subscription revenue for Red Hat enterprise technologies, our ability to increase annual average subscription revenue per customer by providing additional value to our customers in the form of additional technology infrastructure and by providing customers with additional services.
Our subscription business model also contrasts with the typical proprietary software license model from a revenue recognition perspective. Under our subscription model, we generally defer revenue when we bill the customer and recognize revenue over the life of the subscription term. In contrast, under a proprietary software license model, the vendor typically recognizes license revenue in the period that the software is initially licensed.
Commitment to the open source development model
We have fully embraced the open source model in the development of our technology solutions and services. Whereas some of our competitors have incorporated certain aspects of this model into their businesses while retaining various features of the proprietary model, Red Hat solutions are based on true open source offerings. Indeed, we share our improvements to our enterprise technologies with the development community. By developing under a collaborative model we offer a benefit to independent and partner developers because they can influence the capabilities of our enterprise technologies to the benefit of their customers. This ultimately increases the overall appeal of our offerings.
Our open source software operating systems
One of the most widely known open source technologies is the Linux kernel, the operating system engine of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. An operating system is the software that allows a computer and its various hardware and software components to interact. A worldwide community of developers collaborate on improving the Linux kernel, and we believe we are able to integrate the best of those improvements into our stable, yet innovative and high-performance Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform. Moreover, as discussed below, Red Hat Enterprise Linux enjoys the support of major original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and ISVs, increasing the interest of developers in adding further enhancements to the Linux kernel.
We seek to engineer Red Hat Enterprise Linux to be a comprehensive, technically advanced, reliable and stable operating system. Red Hat Enterprise Linux is an integrated, open source operating system, which meets the performance, reliability and scalability demands of chief information officers of large and small enterprises, from the edge of the network to the data center.
Our operating system platforms are intended to be:
Our middleware tools and platforms
Middleware generally refers to the software that allows applications and operating systems or two or more applications to communicate with each other. JBoss Enterprise Middleware combines and integrates the latest features from the JBoss.org communities into stable, enterprise-class platform distributions for application and service hosting, content aggregation, data federation and service integration for both the development and deployment of web applications.
Our middleware tools and platforms are intended to:
Technology-based systems management services
RHN and JBoss ON, our principal systems management offerings, improve the system reliability, availability and security of Red Hat enterprise technologies, while increasing system administrator productivity to reduce the overall cost of managing Red Hat enterprise technologies. These solutions bring together a number of tools, services and information capabilities that customers may use to help promote greater reliability, availability and security within enterprise systems. Among other capabilities, RHN allows a system administrator to simplify management tasks by grouping systems together rather than managing them separately. We provide the RHN Update Module, described more fully below, as part of an annual subscription to Red Hat Enterprise Linux and other Red Hat enterprise technologies. We also provide more advanced services, such as the Management, Provisioning and Monitoring Modules described below, for an additional subscription fee. In addition, we offer RHN in two configurations: one which allows RHN systems management services to be provided from inside the customers firewall and one in which the services are provided directly from connectivity with Red Hats facilities. JBoss ON provides systems management services, such as software updates, configuration, administration and inventorying, from inside the customers firewall. In addition we offer monitoring capabilities which provide enhanced management services for alerting and monitoring the status of JBoss Enterprise Middleware deployments.
Red Hat Global Services
Our Global Services offerings consist of training, consulting and support services designed to meet the needs of the enterprise. With these services, our goal is to help promote customer success by providing knowledge, experience and advice at all stages of the information technology (IT) life cycle.
By providing consulting and support services that help to enable both infrastructure and middleware solutions, we facilitate the further adoption and use of our products in the enterprise. In addition, our training services help populate customers with skilled Red Hat Certified Engineers, Red Hat Certified Technicians, Red Hat Certified Security Specialists, Red Hat Certified Architects, JBoss developers, JBoss architects and JBoss administrators who often serve as internal open source advocates, increasing opportunities for the successful adoption and use of our enterprise technologies. Our educational and consulting services promote and reinforce the use of open source solutions as well as our Red Hat and JBoss brands.
Support by leading independent software and hardware vendors to the large enterprise
In order to facilitate the widespread deployment of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JBoss Enterprise Middleware, we have focused on gaining broad support for Red Hat enterprise technologies from the providers of hardware and software technology critical to the large enterprise. For example, leading software vendors that enable applications to run on our enterprise technologies include BEA, BMC Software, Inc. (BMC), Computer Associates, Inc. (CA), HP, IBM, Oracle, SAP AG (SAP), Sybase, Inc. (Sybase), Symantec Corporation (Symantec), and VMware. In addition, we have certification and pre-load arrangements with leading hardware providers including Dell Inc. (Dell), HP, IBM, Sun, Fujitsu Limited (Fujitsu), Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) BV (Fujitsu Siemens), NEC Corporation (NEC) and Hitachi, Ltd (Hitachi), as well as certification agreements with leading networking and storage companies including Cisco Systems, Inc. (Cisco), EMC Corporation (EMC), Nokia Corporation (Nokia) and Network Appliance Inc. (Network Appliance). We also have strategic alliance relationships with the leading semiconductor providers Intel Corporation (Intel) and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD).
An online destination for the open source community
We are dedicated to helping serve the interests and needs of open source software users and developers online. Our website, redhat.com, serves as a substantial resource for information related to open source initiatives. It contains news we believe to be of interest to open source users and developers, features for the open source community, a commerce site and a point of access for software downloads and upgrades. Visitors to our website can organize and participate in user groups, make available incremental code improvements and bug fixes and share knowledge regarding the use and development of open source software. By acting as a clearinghouse of open source information and by facilitating the interaction of developers, particularly through the Fedora and JBoss.org projects, we believe our website has become a community center for open source. Additionally, our website, redhat.com, serves as a primary customer interface, web store and order mechanism for many of our products and services.
Red Hat is organized primarily on the basis of three geographic business units: the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific. These business units are aggregated into one reportable segment due to the similarity in nature of products provided (e.g., Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JBoss Enterprise Middleware products), financial performance economics (e.g., revenue growth and gross margin), methods of distribution (direct and indirect) and customer classification and base (e.g., distributors, resellers and enterprise).
As of February 29, 2008, Red Hat had more than 55 locations around the world, including offices in the North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Australia. As stated above, we manage our international business on the basis of three geographic business units: the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific. See NOTE 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our geographic areas of operation. See Item 1A, Risk Factors for a discussion of some of the risks attendant to our international operations.
Our business strategy is designed to (i) gain widespread acceptance and deployment of Red Hat enterprise technologies by enterprise users globally, (ii) generate increasing subscription revenue by renewing existing subscriptions and providing additional value to our customers, and by growing the number of enterprise technologies that comprise our open source architecture, and (iii) generate increased revenue by providing additional systems management, developer and other services as well as from additional market penetration through a broader and deeper set of channel partner relationships, including OEMs, and our own international expansion, among other means.
The key elements of our strategy aim to:
Increase the adoption of Red Hat enterprise technologies by enterprise users globally
We see enterprise users increasingly view Red Hat Enterprise Linux as a viable operating system for mission-critical areas of the information technology infrastructure and JBoss Enterprise Middleware as a viable middleware platform for development and deployment of distributed applications, business processes and web services used in a service-oriented architecture. We intend to promote further acceptance of our enterprise technologies through a variety of means. These means include promoting and developing additional Red Hat enterprise technologies that offer additional functionality (such as messaging and virtualization) and applications that build on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system and JBoss Enterprise Middleware as part of our open source architecture, bringing new management services to market, improving our technology infrastructure to ease the purchasing and renewal process, offering expanded developer services, focusing on new geographic areas, capitalizing on the success of our strategic relationships with companies such as Intel, AMD, IBM, Symantec, Sybase, EMC, Dell, HP, Sun, Nokia, Cisco, Network Appliance, Fujitsu, Fujitsu Siemens, NEC Corporation and Hitachi and continuing to add strategic relationships with other major information technology companies. We believe the relationships with these and other companies will continue to stimulate the technical advancement and widespread distribution of our enterprise technologies, the attraction of existing third-party enterprise applications to Red Hat enterprise technologies and the development of new third-party enterprise applications. We believe that the low-cost, high value offerings from Red Hat are a catalyst for change in the IT industry, enabling new deployments and migrations, which encourage a larger ecosystem of compatible hardware and software solutions.
Continue to pursue strategic acquisitions and alliances
Red Hats strategy is to continue to expand the capabilities available under our open source architecture by pursuing a selective acquisition strategy as opportunities arise to complement and expand our offerings and service capabilities. We also intend to create and extend our strategic alliances and channel partner relationships where it is beneficial to our business. In fiscal 2008, Red Hat acquired the business of MetaMatrix, a leading provider of enterprise data management software, and a service logic execution environment that facilitates voice, video and data in next-generation applications.
Continue to grow our presence in international markets
We have operations in a number of countries in the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific. We are continuing to expand our operations geographically, with over 55 offices worldwide.
We offer our technologies and documentation in various languages. See NOTE 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our revenue by geographic area.
Continue to invest in the development of open source technology
We intend to continue to invest significant resources in the development of new open source technology in areas that include messaging, virtualization, real-time computing, middleware, management, security and
identity, capitalizing on our substantial experience working with the open source model and community. We expect this continued investment to take the form of expenditures on internal development efforts, as well as continued funding of third-party open source projects and the expansion of our developer services.
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Red Hats software solutions, consisting of Red Hat enterprise technologies such as Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JBoss Enterprise Middleware, are at the center of our subscription strategy and our open source architecture. Our services offerings, principally directed toward our medium & large enterprise customers and the leading hardware providers with whom we have strategic agreements, include technical support and maintenance, training, professional services, embedded services, engineering services and hardware certification.
Generally, our software products come with a limited duration services subscription delivered on an annual and multi-year subscription basis. The subscriptions offer varying levels of support services as well as access to basic software updates and configuration management functionality via our integrated management technologies RHN, JBoss ON and JBoss Support Portal.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Red Hat Desktop technologies
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is an operating system built from various open source software packages including the Linux kernel, and is designed expressly for enterprise computing. Red Hat Enterprise Linux delivers the features required for commercial deployments, including:
In March 2007, we released our most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RHEL 5, with vitualization capability incorporated into the core product. The product family for RHEL 5 is generally offered in three configurations:
We believe that these configurations simplify the product selection and purchase process and drive deeper product adoption, while providing the flexibility that our customers desire. Each of these offerings includes virtualization capabilities that provide customers with tools to help in optimizing both existing and new hardware while providing more deployment options regarding variable workloads, virtual appliances, legacy applications and testing configurations.
JBoss Enterprise Middleware
JBoss Enterprise Middleware provides a suite of products for developing, deploying, integrating and managing distributed, composite and web-based applications and services. JBoss products are based on the Java programming language, are deployed on a variety of leading operating systems and support a distributed, modular, reusable and open standards-based Service Oriented Architecture or SOA deployment for applications and data. JBoss Enterprise Middleware offerings consist of a number of deployment platforms and development frameworks, including:
Additional Red Hat enterprise technologies
Red Hat enterprise technologies also include other technology infrastructure, including software for software development, high availability clusters of Linux systems and storage, authentication of users as well as directory server services. These applications broaden customer choice and are components of our open source architecture vision for the enterprise. These applications include:
Red Hat systems management solutions
RHN, JBoss Support Portal and JBoss ON provide management and software delivery services for Red Hat Enterprise Linux and JBoss Enterprise Middleware technologies. With a focus on open standards and scalability, our management solutions help organizations increase productivity, lower costs and enhance security by provisioning, monitoring and updating systems.
Services for Red Hat Enterprise Linux are available, in both Hosted and Satellite architectures, to provide organizations with the appropriate level of flexibility, security and scalability based on their size and needs. RHN includes the following four modules:
Update ModuleIncluded in Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscriptions, the Update Module is the entry-level offering for RHN, providing functionality enhancements and upgrades to individual systems. Update Module includes functionality such as a graphical user interface, priority notification, errata information, Red Hat Package Manager (RPM) dependency checking and auto update. Update Module also gives customers access to electronic delivery of software related to their Red Hat subscriptions.
Management ModuleThe Management Module allows customers to manage Red Hat enterprise technology infrastructure. Designed to enable scalable enterprise administration, the Management Module features systems grouping, role-based administration and scheduled actions.
Provisioning ModuleThe Provisioning Module includes features such as operating system provisioning (for new, unformatted systems or previously deployed systems), configuration management, multi-state rollback, scheduled remote actions, auto discovery, configuration tools and RPM-based application provisioning.
Monitoring ModuleThe Monitoring Module, only available in Satellite deployments, adds performance-tracking capabilities to RHN. Users can configure monitoring checks based on numerous pre-built probes, or they can create their own. Email or pager warnings send alerts when defined performance thresholds are crossed.
With the exception of the Update Module, which is provided with a subscription to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, customers purchase entitlements to these services on an annual subscription basis.
RHN has two architectures designed to satisfy customers requirements:
HostedWith the Hosted architecture, the customers individual systems connect to RHN via the Internet to receive information, functionality enhancements and upgrades from Red Hats hosted RHN servers. This architecture is the default RHN method for accessing subscription services to Red Hat Enterprise Linux. To reduce Internet bandwidth consumption, RHN Proxy Servers can be added to a Hosted deployment to cache content locally.
SatelliteThe Satellite architecture stores RHN functionality, such as system profiles, reporting data and application server, locally on a customers system located behind its IT firewall. The Satellite server connects with RHN over the Internet to download updates and upgrades. The architecture allows customers greater control and flexibility over their management solution, as they may also use Satellite to distribute custom or third-party content to their Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems. Additional RHN Proxy Servers can also be added to a Satellite deployment to improve performance and package downloads for remote locations.
JBoss Support Portal provides an on-line method for JBoss Enterprise Middleware customers to obtain certified software, access to the JBoss information knowledge base and software update alerts and advisories, as well as interact with our JBoss technical support engineers. JBoss ON is deployed in a manner similar to RHN Satellite and provides a mechanism for the management of JBoss middleware environments. Similar to RHN Satellite, JBoss ON functionality includes inventory, software update, management and deployment. JBoss ON also provides an extended module for monitoring and alert notifications on the status of JBoss Enterprise Middleware deployments.
Red Hat Global Services
Red Hat Global Service offerings are designed to help enterprise customers derive additional value from Red Hat enterprise technologies and open source technology.
Global Learning Services offers an array of training courses worldwide to meet the diverse training needs of customers. Certifications include Red Hat Certified Technician, Red Hat Certified Engineer, Red Hat Certified Security Specialist and Red Hat Certified Architect. Courses span topics such as system administration and advanced enterprise development, deployment security, middleware and role-based offerings. We offer open enrollment at training centers in locations worldwide and, as an alternative, via e-learning virtual training, workshop sessions or by on-site instruction.
Global Professional Services offers consulting services for IT deployments, from assessment and implementation to upgrade planning, migrations, integrations and application development.
Global Support Services (GSS) is Red Hats worldwide, mission-critical technical support group that spans our infrastructure, middleware and systems management technologies. GSS provides a variety of production support levels and is generally included with Red Hat subscriptions. For developers, GSS offers specialized support services and an online knowledge base of technical information. GSS also provides a proactive relationship-based service with Technical Account Managers for enterprise customers.
In the operating systems market, we compete with a number of large and well-established companies that have significantly greater financial resources, larger development staffs and more extensive marketing and distribution capabilities. These competitors include Microsoft, Novell, Sun and Oracle, all of which offer hardware-independent, multi-user operating systems and various virtualization software for Intel platforms that compete with Red Hat offerings. Moreover, HP, Unisys Corporation, IBM and Sun each offer the UNIX operating system. Many of these competitors bundle competitive operating systems such as UNIX with their own hardware offerings, thereby making it more difficult for us to penetrate their customer bases. Moreover, Sun has provided their Solaris UNIX software under an open source license and model, now called Open Solaris. In addition, with virtualization emerging as an important element of the operating environment, virtualization software companies like VMware are also competitors to Red Hat. No assurance can be given that our efforts to compete effectively will be sufficient.
Within the specific category of Linux operating systems, our chief competitor has historically been Novell, with its SUSE brand of Linux. Other, less well capitalized Linux brands include Mandriva, Debian, Canonical Ubuntu and other regionally-specific distributions. The financial and legal barriers to creating a new Linux distribution are relatively low because the open source license governing Linux distributions permits copying, modification and redistribution. In 2006, Oracle, a large and well capitalized company, began to sell support for its version of the Linux operating system. See Item 1A, Risk Factors.
In 2006, Microsoft and Novell announced an agreement to collaborate on technology, a cross covenant not to sue the other partys customers for patent infringement and an agreement by Microsoft to purchase and distribute coupons for SUSE Linux maintenance and support. While Red Hat provides its subscription customers with certain protections in the event that a third party were to bring a claim alleging intellectual property infringement, there is no assurance that Red Hats efforts in this regard will be sufficient to satisfy the concerns of customers in all instances, including any concerns created by the Microsoft/Novell agreement. Also, the coupons to SUSE Linux distributed by Microsoft have intensified this competition at certain customers and may create downward pressure on the prices that Red Hat charges and/or reduced demand for our products which could affect our ability to renew current customers and obtain new customers and impact revenue, operating margin and market share. See Item 1A, Risk Factors.
In the middleware market, we compete with a number of large and well-established companies that have significantly greater financial resources, larger development staffs and more extensive marketing and distribution capabilities. These competitors include, but are not limited to IBM, BEA, Oracle, Sun and Microsoft, all of which offer broad portfolios of enterprise Java and non-Java middleware products. All of these vendors, with the exception of Sun, offer the majority of their middleware products under a typical proprietary software license model. IBM and Sun often bundle hardware and software for their customers, making it more difficult to penetrate these customer bases.
With our professional services offerings, we face competition in the market for services related to the deployment of our enterprise technologies. Our competitors in the market include IBM, Sun, Novell, Oracle and HP, as well as other technology consulting companies.
In the management services market, we compete with a number of large companies that have significantly greater financial resources, larger development staffs and more extensive marketing and distribution capabilities. These competitors include IBM, HP, CA, Novell, Microsoft, Oracle and BMC, all of which offer heterogeneous operating system support, including support for operating systems such as Linux, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX and Windows. Many of these competitors have legacy client/server offerings that require relatively long implementation cycles and are difficult to displace in enterprise customers due to switching costs. There are numerous other companies that focus exclusively on management offerings that are likely to support Linux-based systems as well as non-Linux-based systems.
The open source software market is not characterized by the traditional barriers to entry that are found in the proprietary software model due to the nature of open source technology. For example, anyone can copy, modify and redistribute Red Hat Enterprise Linux, JBoss Enterprise Middleware and our other open source products. However, they are not permitted to refer to these products as Red Hat or JBoss products unless they have a formal business relationship with us. Moreover, as it relates to our enterprise technologies and management offerings, our customers agree not to utilize the subscription services that they receive from us for any system for which they have not purchased a subscription. In addition, the only means by which customers can receive a certified version of Red Hat enterprise software and receive certified functionality enhancements and upgrades to a copy of Red Hat enterprise software is to purchase and maintain a current subscription directly from us or our certified partners with whom we have agreements.
We believe that the major factors affecting the competitive landscape for our products include:
Although we believe that overall we generally compete on par or favorably with many of our competitors in a number of respects, including product performance, price and breadth of hardware and software compatibility, we believe that a number of our key competitors currently have superior distribution capabilities. In addition, there are significantly more enterprise infrastructure applications available for competing operating systems technologies, such as Windows and UNIX, than there are for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. An integral part of our strategy has been to help address these shortcomings by, among other methods, strengthening our existing strategic relationships and entering into new ones to expand our distribution capabilities and by attracting more attention to the open source movement. Also, increasing the volume of installed subscriptions of Red Hat enterprise technologies should create additional opportunities and incentives for software developers to write more applications that are compatible with Red Hat enterprise technologies.
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT
We have invested, and intend to continue to invest, significant resources in product and technology development. We expended $97.4 million, $71.0 million and $40.9 million, in our fiscal years ended February 29, 2008, February 28, 2007 and February 28, 2006, respectively, in research and development costs. We focus and modify our product development efforts based on the needs of users and changes in the marketplace. We are currently focusing our development efforts on improving or adding the functionality to our offerings that are needed by the Global 2000 or required for leading third-party applications upon which the Global 2000 are dependent. However, any upgrades and enhancements are offered on a when and if available basis.
Our software engineers collaborate with open source software development teams working across the Internet and through our Fedora Project and JBoss.org communities. This involvement enables us to remain abreast of, and lead, certain technical advances, plans for development of new features and timing of releases, as well as other information related to the development of open source projects.
Our software engineers make development contributions to many components comprising the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system and JBoss Enterprise Middleware and provide leadership within the various open source communities across many of the core components.
Our software development engineers perform extensive testing of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, JBoss Enterprise Middleware, RHN, JBoss Support Portal, JBoss ON, JBoss Developer Studio and other Red Hat enterprise technologies. We use various industry methods of quality assurance testing to help ensure that our enterprise technologies are solidly engineered and ready for use by our customers when delivered. We also work closely with leading hardware and software vendors to help ensure their hardware and applications will operate effectively with Red Hat enterprise platforms.
In addition, we continue to invest substantial resources in the development and commercialization of open source technologies that provide added value in addition to the operating system.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux, JBoss Middleware and our other open source products have been developed and made available for licensing under the GNU General Public License, the GNU Lesser General Public License and other open source licenses. These licenses permit the licensee to copy, modify and distribute the software. Some licenses, such as the GNU General Public License and the GNU Lesser General Public License, require that any resulting or derivative work that is distributed to others be licensed under the same terms. Therefore, although we generally retain the copyrights to the code that we develop ourselves, due to the nature of our open source software products and the licenses under which we develop and distribute them, our most valuable
intellectual property is our collection of trademarks and the recognition of our brand. We rely on a combination of trademarks, copyrights and patents to protect our intellectual property. We also generally enter into confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements with our employees and consultants, and generally control access to and distribution of our confidential documentation and other proprietary information.
We pursue registration of some of our trademarks in the United States and in other countries. We have registered the trademark Red Hat and the Red Hat Shadowman logo in countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
Despite our efforts to protect our trademark rights, unauthorized third parties have in the past attempted, and in the future may attempt, to misappropriate our trademark rights. We cannot be certain that we will succeed in preventing the continued misappropriation of our tradename and trademarks in these circumstances or that we will be able to prevent this type of unauthorized use in the future. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect, or deter misappropriation of our trademark rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In addition, while we engage in certain enforcement activity, policing unauthorized use of our trademark rights is difficult, expensive and time consuming, and our efforts may be inadequate. The loss of any material trademark or tradename could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Red Hat has also undertaken patent protection of some of the innovative ideas of our software developers. Not all of these inventions are applicable to our current technologies. Some provide protection to new and other technologies. As part of Red Hats commitment to the open source community, we provide our Patent Promise, an undertaking, subject to certain limitations, not to enforce our patent rights against users of an open source software. This permits the development and distribution of open source applications that read on our patents. Consequently, it is unlikely that our patents will, of themselves, provide us substantial revenue. Rather, they may provide a measure of deterrence against the potential patent infringement claims of third parties and may help ensure that new technologies and innovations covered by our patents remain open. We are also a founding member and active participant, along with other industry leaders (including IBM, NEC, Philips, Sony and Novell) in the Open Invention Network LLC, which acquires patents with the goal of promoting innovation in open source for the Linux platform.
Third parties have in the past asserted, and may in the future assert, infringement claims against us which may result in costly litigation or require us to obtain a license to third-party intellectual property rights. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings. There can be no assurance that such licenses will be available on reasonable terms or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Red Hat regularly commits to its subscription customers that if portions of our enterprise products are found to infringe third party intellectual property rights we will, at our expense and option: (i) obtain the right for the customer to continue to use the product consistent with their subscription agreement with us; (ii) modify the product so that its use is non-infringing; or (iii) replace the infringing component with a non-infringing component, and indemnify them against specified infringement claims. Although we cannot predict whether we will need to satisfy these commitments and often have limitations on these commitments, satisfying these commitments could be costly and time consuming and could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
As of February 29, 2008, Red Hat had more than 2,200 employees. From time to time, we also employ independent contractors. Our employees are not represented by any labor union and are not recognized under a collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe our relations with our employees are generally good.
We maintain a website at www.redhat.com. We make available, free of charge on our website, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Securities Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those reports with, or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). We also similarly make available, free of charge on our website, the reports filed with the SEC by our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders pursuant to Section 16 under the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after copies of those filings are provided to us by those persons. We are not including the information contained at www.redhat.com, or at any other Internet address as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 contains the certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 hereto.
Our Chief Executive Officer submitted an annual certification to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on September 13, 2007, stating that he was not aware of any violation by us of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
Set forth below are certain risks and cautionary statements, which supplement other disclosures in this report.
Moreover, certain statements contained in this report and the documents incorporated by reference in this report, including in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that is not strictly a historical statement (for example, statements regarding current or future financial performance, managements plans and objectives for future operations, product plans and performance, managements expectations regarding market risk and market penetration, managements assessment of market factors or strategies, objectives and plans of Red Hat and its partners). Words such as anticipates, believes, expects, estimates, intends, plans, projects, and similar expressions, may also identify such forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of Red Hats future performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause Red Hats actual results to differ materially from those found in the forward-looking statements and from historical trends. These risks and uncertainties include the risks and cautionary statements detailed below and elsewhere in this report as well as in Red Hats other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), copies of which may be accessed through the SECs web site at http://www.sec.gov. Readers are urged to carefully review these risks and cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included in this report represent our views as of the date of this report. We specifically disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the future. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this report.
RISKS RELATED TO BUSINESS UNCERTAINTY
If we fail to continue to establish and maintain strategic distribution and other collaborative relationships with industry-leading companies, we may not be able to attract and retain a larger customer base.
Our success depends in part on our ability to continue to establish and maintain strategic distribution and other collaborative relationships with industry-leading hardware manufacturers, distributors, software vendors and enterprise solutions providers such as SAP AG (SAP), Dell Inc. (Dell), Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP), International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), Sun Microsystems, Inc. (SUN), Fujitsu Limited (Fujitsu), NEC Corporation (NEC) and others. These relationships allow us to offer our products and services to a much larger customer base than we would otherwise be able to through our direct sales and marketing efforts. We may not be able to maintain these relationships or replace them on attractive terms. In addition, our existing strategic relationships do not, and any future strategic relationships may not, afford us any exclusive marketing or distribution rights. As a result, many of the companies, with which we have strategic alliances pursue alternative technologies and develop alternative products and services in addition to or in lieu of our products and services, either on their own or in collaboration with others, including our competitors. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that the companies with which we have strategic relationships will market our products effectively or continue to devote the resources necessary to provide us with effective sales, marketing and technical support.
We have entered into and may continue to enter into or seek to enter into business combinations and acquisitions, which may be difficult to complete and integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value or divert management attention.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past entered into business combinations and acquisitions (for example, our acquisition of JBoss in June 2006), and we may continue to do so in the future. We have limited experience in making acquisitions, and acquisitions present significant challenges and risks, including:
There can be no assurance that we will manage these challenges and risks successfully. Moreover, if we are not successful in completing acquisitions that we have pursued or may pursue, our business may be adversely affected, and we may incur substantial expenses and divert significant management time and resources. In addition, in pursuing such acquisitions, we could use substantial portions of our available cash as all or a portion of the purchase price. We could also issue additional securities as consideration for these acquisitions, which could cause our stockholders to suffer significant dilution, or we may incur substantial debt. Any acquisition may not generate additional revenue or profit for us, which may adversely affect our operating results.
If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.
We have expanded our operations rapidly in recent years. For example, our total revenue increased from approximately $400.6 million for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 to approximately $523.0 million for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008. Moreover, the total number of our employees increased from over 1,800 as of February 28, 2007 to over 2,200 as of February 29, 2008 and is expected to generally increase in the foreseeable future. In addition, we continue to explore ways to extend our product and service offerings and geographic reach. Our growth has placed and will likely continue to place a strain on our management systems, information systems, resources and internal controls. Our ability to successfully offer products and services and implement our business plan requires adequate information systems and resources and oversight from our senior management. As we grow, we must also continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. As we grow and expand globally, controls and oversight functions will become more complex and distributed and may in part be outsourced. We may not be able to adequately screen and hire or adequately train, supervise and manage sufficient personnel or develop management, or effectively manage and develop our controls and oversight functions and information systems to adequately manage our expansion effectively. If we are unable to adequately manage our growth and expansion, our operations and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
We rely, to a significant degree, on an indirect sales channel for distribution of our products and services, and disruption of any part of this channel could adversely affect the sales of our products.
We use a variety of different distribution methods to sell our products and services, including indirect channel partners, such as third party OEMs, resellers and distributors. A number of these partners in turn
distribute via their own networks of channel partners (e.g., distributors and resellers), with whom we have no direct relationship. We rely, to a significant degree, on our channel partners to, among other activities, select, screen and maintain relationships with our distribution network and for the distribution of our products and services in a manner that is consistent with Red Hats quality standards. Our indirect distribution channel could be affected by disruptions in the relationships of and with our channel partners and their networks, including their customers or suppliers. As a result, we may be required to devote greater support and professional services resources to distribute our products and support our customers, which could drive up costs and may not be as effective. We cannot guarantee that our channel partners will market our products effectively. Disruptions in our distribution channel or poor marketing support by channel partners could lead to decreased sales or slower than expected growth or increased distribution and support costs.
We rely on software licensed from other parties, the loss of which could increase our costs and delay software shipments.
We utilize various types of software licensed from unaffiliated third parties. Our business would be disrupted if any of the software we license from others or functional equivalents of this software were either no longer available to us or no longer offered to us on commercially reasonable terms. In either case, we would be required to either redesign our products to function with software available from other parties or develop these components ourselves, which would result in increased costs and could result in delays in our product shipments and the release of new product offerings. Furthermore, we might be forced to limit the features available in our current or future products. If we fail to maintain or renegotiate any of these software licenses, we could face significant delays and diversion of resources in attempting to license and integrate a functional equivalent of the software.
We may not be able to continue to attract and retain capable management personnel.
Our ability to retain key management personnel or hire capable new management personnel as we grow may be challenged to the extent the technology sector performs well and/or if companies with more generous compensation packages or greater perceived growth opportunities compete for the same personnel. In addition, historically we have used share-based compensation as a key component of our compensation packages. Changes in the accounting for share-based compensation could adversely affect our earnings or force us to use more cash compensation to attract and retain capable personnel. Volatility in the stock market may reduce the value of our share-based awards to the recipient. Such events, or if we are unable to secure shareholder approval for increases in the number of shares eligible for share-based compensation grants, could adversely affect our ability to successfully attract and retain key management personnel.
We depend on our key personnel that we employ.
Our future success depends on the services and effectiveness of a number of key officers and employees, including our CEO, who assumed his role on January 1, 2008. The loss of the technical knowledge and industry expertise of any of these individuals could seriously impede our success. Moreover, the loss of these individuals, particularly to a competitor, some of which may be in a position to offer greater compensation, and any resulting loss of customers could reduce our market share and diminish the Red Hat brand and adversely affect our business or stock price.
A number of our key employees have become, or will soon become, vested in a significant amount of their equity compensation awards. Employees may be more likely to leave us after a significant portion of their equity compensation awards fully vest, especially if the shares underlying the equity awards have significantly appreciated in value. If we do not succeed in retaining and motivating our CEO and key employees and attracting new key personnel, our business, its financial performance and our stock price may decline.
Our corporate culture has contributed to our success, and if we cannot maintain this culture as we grow, we could lose the innovation, creativity and teamwork fostered by our culture, and our business may be harmed.
We believe that a critical contributor to our success has been our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, creativity and teamwork. As our organization grows, and we are required to implement more complex organizational management structures, we may find it increasingly difficult to maintain beneficial aspects of our corporate culture. If we are unable to maintain our corporate culture, we may find it difficult to attract and retain motivated employees.
Our subscription-based contract model may encounter customer resistance or we may experience a decline in the demand for our products.
The subscription agreement used for many of our products, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux, requires customers to agree to a subscription for our services for each installed system on which they deploy our subscription based products. At the same time, the subscription agreement places no restriction on the customers right to redistribute the products. While we believe this practice complies with the requirements of the GNU General Public License, and while we have reviewed this practice with the Free Software Foundation, the organization that maintains and provides interpretations of the GNU General Public License, we may still encounter customer resistance to this distribution model. To the extent we are unsuccessful in promoting or defending this distribution model, our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
If our current and future customers do not renew their subscription agreements with us, our revenue and operating results may be adversely impacted.
Our customers may not renew their subscriptions for our service after the expiration of their subscription agreements and in fact, some customers elect not to do so. In addition, our customers may opt for a lower priced edition of our services or for fewer subscriptions. We have limited historical data with respect to rates of customer subscription renewals, so we cannot accurately predict customer renewal rates. Our customers renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including their level of satisfaction with our services and their ability to continue their operations and spending levels. Government contracts could be subject to future funding that may affect the extension or termination of programs and generally are subject to the right of the government to terminate for convenience or non-appropriation. If we experience a decline in the renewal rates for our customers or they opt for lower priced editions of our offerings or fewer subscriptions, our revenue and operating results may be adversely impacted.
If open source software programmers, most of whom we do not employ, do not continue to develop and enhance open source technologies, we may be unable to develop new products, adequately enhance our existing products or meet customer requirements for innovation, quality and price.
We rely to a significant degree on a number of largely informal communities of independent open source software programmers to develop and enhance our products. For example, Linus Torvalds, a prominent open source software developer, and a relatively small group of software engineers, many of whom are not employed by us, are primarily responsible for the development and evolution of the Linux kernel, which is the heart of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system. If these groups of programmers fail to adequately further develop and enhance open source technologies, we would have to rely on other parties to develop and enhance our products or we would need to develop and enhance our products with our own resources. We cannot predict whether further developments and enhancements to these technologies would be available from reliable alternative sources. In either event, our development expenses could be increased and our product release and upgrade schedules could be delayed. Moreover, if third party software programmers fail to adequately further develop and enhance open source technologies, the development and adoption of these technologies could be
stifled and our products could become less competitive. Delays in developing, completing or shipping new or enhanced products could result in delayed or reduced revenue for those products and could also adversely affect customer acceptance of those offerings.
If third-party enterprise hardware and software providers do not continue to make offerings compatible with our offerings, our software will cease to be competitive.
Our products will not be competitive unless third-party enterprise hardware and software offerings are compatible with our offerings. We intend to encourage the development of additional applications that operate on both current and new versions of our offerings by, among other means, attracting third-party developers to the Linux platform, providing open source tools to create these applications and maintaining our existing developer relationships through marketing and technical support. We intend to encourage the compatibility of our software with various hardware platforms by maintaining and expanding our relationships, both business and technical, with relevant independent hardware vendors. If we are not successful in achieving these goals, however, our products will not be competitive and our sales growth will be adversely affected.
We may be unable to predict the future course of open source technology development, which could reduce the market appeal of our products and damage our reputation.
We do not exercise control over many aspects of the development of open source technology. Different groups of open source software programmers compete with one another to develop new technology. Typically, the technology developed by one group will become more widely used than that developed by others. If we acquire or adopt new technology and incorporate it into our products but competing technology becomes more widely used or accepted, the market appeal of our products may be reduced and that could harm our reputation, diminish the Red Hat brand and result in decreased revenue.
Because of the characteristics of open source software, there are few technology barriers to entry in the open source market by new competitors and it may be relatively easy for new competitors with greater resources than we have to enter our markets and compete with us.
One of the characteristics of open source software is that anyone can modify the existing software or develop new software that competes with existing open source software. Such competition can develop without the degree of overhead and lead time required by traditional proprietary software companies. It is possible for new competitors with greater resources than ours to develop their own open source solutions, potentially reducing the demand for our solutions. For example, in October 2006 Oracle Corporation (Oracle) announced plans to sell support for its version of the Linux operating system. In addition, some competitors make their open source software available for free download and use on an ad hoc basis or may position their open source software as a loss leader. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that competitive pressure and/or the availability of open source software will not result in price reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share, any one of which could seriously harm our business.
Our continued success depends on our ability to adapt to a rapidly changing industry as well as maintaining a strong brand. Investment in new business strategies and initiatives could disrupt our ongoing business and may present risks not originally contemplated.
We must continue to invest significant resources in research and development in order to enhance our existing products and services and introduce new high-quality products and services and technology infrastructure. If we are unable to ensure that our users and customers have a high quality experience with our products and services, then they may become dissatisfied and move to competitors products and services. In addition, if we are unable to predict user preferences or industry changes, or if we are unable to modify our products and services on a timely basis, we may lose customers.
We believe that the brand identity that we have developed has contributed significantly to the success of our business. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing the Red Hat brand is important to expanding our customer base and attracting talented employees. In order to maintain and enhance our brand, we may be required to make substantial investments that may or may not be successful. If we fail to promote and maintain our brand, or if we incur excessive costs in doing so, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. Maintaining our brand will depend in part on our ability to remain a leader in open source technology and our ability to continue to provide high quality products and services.
Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt to rapidly changing technologies, to adapt our services to evolving industry standards and to improve the performance and reliability of our services. Our failure to adapt to such changes would harm our business. In addition, the widespread adoption of other technological changes could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our services or infrastructure.
Moreover, we believe that our continued success depends on our investing in new business strategies or initiatives that complement our strategic direction and product road map. Such endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including distraction of managements attention away from other business operations, and insufficient revenue generation to offset liabilities and expenses undertaken with such strategies and initiatives. Because these endeavors may be inherently risky, no assurance can be given that such endeavors will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.
Security and privacy breaches may expose us to liability and cause us to lose customers.
Our security and testing measures may not prevent security breaches that could harm our business. For example, a significant number of our users provide us with credit card and other confidential information and authorize us to bill their credit card accounts directly for our products and services. Typically, we rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to enhance transmission security of confidential information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography, inadequate facility security or other developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology used by us to protect customer data. Any compromise of our security could harm our reputation or financial condition and, therefore, our business. In addition, a party who is able to circumvent our security measures or exploit inadequacies in our security measures, could, among other effects, misappropriate proprietary information, cause interruptions in our operations or expose customers to computer viruses or other disruptions. Actual or perceived vulnerabilities may lead to claims against us. While our customer agreements typically contain provisions that seek to limit our liability, there is no assurance these provisions will be enforceable and effective under applicable law.
We are vulnerable to system failures, which could harm our business.
We rely on our technology infrastructure, among other functions, to sell our products and services, support our partners, fulfill orders and bill, collect and make payments. Our systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, power loss, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks and other events. A significant number of our systems are not redundant, and our disaster recovery planning is not sufficient for every eventuality. Our systems are also subject to break-ins, sabotage and intentional acts of vandalism by internal employees and contractors as well as third parties. Despite any precautions we may take, such problems could result in, among other consequences, interruptions in our services, which could harm our reputation and financial condition. We do not carry business interruption insurance sufficient to compensate us for losses that may result from interruptions in our services as a result of system failures.
Any interruption in the availability of our websites and on-line interactions with customers and partners would create a large volume of user questions and complaints that would need to be addressed by our support personnel rather than by self-help. If our support personnel cannot meet this demand, customer and partner satisfaction levels may fall, which in turn could cause additional claims or reduced revenue.
RISKS RELATED TO LEGAL UNCERTAINTY
If our products are found or alleged to infringe third-party intellectual property rights, we could be required to redesign our products, replace components of our products, enter into license agreements with third parties and provide infringement indemnification.
We regularly commit to our subscription customers that if portions of our enterprise products are found to infringe any third party intellectual property rights we will, at our expense and option: (i) obtain the right for the customer to continue to use the product consistent with their subscription agreement with us; (ii) modify the product so that it is non-infringing; or (iii) replace the infringing component with a non-infringing component, and indemnify them against specified infringement claims. Although we cannot predict whether we will need to satisfy these commitments and often have limitations on these commitments, satisfying the commitments could be costly and time consuming and could materially and adversely affect our financial position and results. In addition, our insurance policies would likely not adequately cover our exposure to this type of claim.
We are vulnerable to claims that our products infringe third-party intellectual property rights because our products are comprised of software components, many of which are developed by numerous independent parties, and an adverse legal decision affecting our intellectual property could materially harm our business.
We are vulnerable to claims that our products infringe third-party intellectual property rights, including patent, copyright and trade secrets because our products are comprised of software components, many of which are developed by numerous independent parties. Moreover, because the scope of software patent protection is often not well defined, patent applications in the United States are not publicly disclosed at the time of filing, and the number of software patents that are issued each year is significant and growing, we may be unable to assess the relevance of patents to our products, or take appropriate responsive action, in a timely or economic manner. We expect that our products could increasingly be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. Defending patent infringement, copyright infringement and/or trade secret claims, even claims without significant merit, can be expensive.
The SCO Group, Inc. (SCO) as well as others have publicly alleged that Linux may infringe certain third-party intellectual property rights. SCO filed suit against IBM, alleging, among other things, that certain Linux kernels wrongfully include SCOs intellectual property. Uncertainty concerning allegations of this type, regardless of their merit, could adversely affect sales of our products. If those asserting such claims were to prevail in this or other actions related to their claims regarding Linux or other products, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
An adverse legal decision regarding the intellectual property in and to our technology and other offerings could harm our business and may do so materially. See Legal Proceedings.
We could be prevented from selling or developing our software if the GNU General Public License and similar licenses under which our products are developed and licensed are not enforceable or are modified so as to become incompatible with other open source licenses.
A number of our offerings, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux, have been developed and licensed under the GNU General Public License and similar open source licenses. These licenses state that any program licensed under them may be liberally copied, modified and distributed. It is possible that a court would hold these licenses to be unenforceable in that or other litigation or that someone could assert a claim for proprietary rights in a program developed and distributed under them. Any ruling by a court that these licenses are not enforceable, or that open source components of our product offerings may not be liberally copied, modified or distributed, may have the effect of preventing us from distributing or developing all or a portion of our products. In addition, licensors of open source software employed in our offerings may, from time to time, modify the terms of their
license agreements in such a manner that those license terms may no longer be compatible with other open source licenses in our offerings or our end user license agreement, and thus could, among other consequences, prevent us from continuing to distribute the software code subject to the modified license.
Our products may contain defects that may be costly to correct, delay market acceptance of our products and expose us to litigation.
Despite our testing procedures, errors have been and will continue to be found in our products after commencement of commercial shipments. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that much of the code in our products is developed by independent parties over whom we exercise no supervision or control. If errors are discovered, we may have to make significant expenditures of capital and devote significant technical resources to analyze, correct, eliminate or work around them and may not be able to successfully do so in a timely manner or at all. Errors and failures in our products could result in a loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of our products, loss of existing or potential customers and delayed or lost revenue and could damage our reputation and our ability to convince commercial users of the benefits of Linux-based operating systems and other open source software products.
In addition, failures in our products could cause system or other failures for our customers who may assert warranty and other claims for substantial damages against us. Although our license agreements with our customers often contain provisions which seek to limit our exposure to potential product liability claims, it is possible that these provisions may not be effective or enforceable under the laws of some jurisdictions. In addition, our insurance policies may not adequately limit our exposure to this type of claim. These claims, even if unsuccessful, could be costly and time consuming to defend and could materially harm our business.
Our efforts to protect our trademarks may not be adequate to prevent third parties from misappropriating our intellectual property rights in our trademarks.
Our most valuable intellectual property is our collection of trademarks. The protective steps we have taken in the past have been, and may in the future continue to be, inadequate to protect and deter misappropriation of, our trademark rights. Although we do not believe that we have suffered material harm from misappropriation to date, we may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our trademark rights in a timely manner. We have registered some of our trademarks in countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia and have other trademark applications pending in each of those regions. Effective trademark protection may not be available in every country in which we offer or intend to offer our products and services. Failure to adequately protect our trademark rights could damage or even destroy the Red Hat brand and impair our ability to compete effectively. Furthermore, defending or enforcing our trademark rights could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Efforts to assert intellectual property ownership rights in our products could impact our standing in the open source community, which could limit our product innovation capabilities and adversely affect our business.
When we undertake actions to protect and maintain ownership and control over our intellectual property, including patents, copyrights and trademark rights, our standing in the open source community could be adversely affected, which in turn could limit our ability to continue to rely on this community, upon which we are dependent, as a resource to help develop and improve our products and further our research and development efforts, and could adversely affect our business.
We are, and may become, involved in disputes and lawsuits that could have a material adverse affect on our performance or stock price.
Following our announcement in July 2004 of our intention to restate certain historical financial statements, 14 class action lawsuits were commenced against us and certain of our current and former directors and officers, by or on behalf of persons claiming to be our stockholders and persons claiming to have purchased or otherwise acquired our securities at specified dates beginning as early as June 19, 2001 and continuing through July 13, 2004. The 14 class action lawsuits have since been consolidated into a single lawsuit. Additional lawsuits or legal proceedings may be commenced against us. Regardless of the outcome, it is likely that we will incur substantial defense costs, and these matters may cause a diversion of our managements time and attention. If we do not prevail in these matters, we could be required to pay substantial damages or settlement costs, which could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition or results of operations. We are unable at this time to assess the validity of the claims or estimate the possible range of damages that might be incurred as a result of the lawsuits. We have not yet established any financial reserves relating to any of these lawsuits. See Legal Proceedings for additional information on certain matters that may affect our performance or stock price.
We may suffer material adverse consequences if we are deemed to be an investment company and may incur significant costs to avoid investment company status.
We may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), if we own investment securities with a value exceeding 40% of our total assets, unless a particular exclusion or safe harbor provision applies. A large portion of our assets has been invested in investment-grade, interest-bearing securities, many of which constitute investment securities under the 1940 Act. As of February 29, 2008, we believe our investment securities did not exceed 40% of our total assets. Even if our investment securities exceeded 40% of our total assets, we believe that we would be otherwise excluded from the definition of investment company and the registration requirements of the 1940 Act, but, absent an exemptive order from the SEC, this result cannot be assured. Investment companies are subject to registration under the 1940 Act and compliance with a variety of restrictions and requirements imposed under the 1940 Act. If we were to be deemed an investment company, we would become subject to the restrictions and requirements of the 1940 Act and the consequences of having been an investment company without registering thereunder, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.
In addition, we may incur significant costs to avoid or eliminate investment company status if an exclusion from the 1940 Act were to be considered unavailable for our use at a time when the value of our investments that constitute investment securities exceeds 40% of our total assets. If we were required to change the allocation of our assets to reduce our ownership of securities that constitute investment securities, and acquire non-investment security assets, this could result in transaction costs, the realization of losses on investment securities sold, and a reduction in the rate of return on our liquid assets.
Our business is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws regarding data protection.
Our business is subject to federal, state and international laws regarding privacy and protection of user data. We post, on our website, our privacy policies and practices concerning the use and disclosure of user data. Any failure by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or other federal, state or international privacy-related or data protection laws and regulations could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines and penalties, a governmental order requiring that we change our data practices could result, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business. Compliance with these regulations may involve significant costs or require changes in business practices that result in reduced revenue. Noncompliance could result in penalties being imposed on us or orders that we cease conducting the noncompliant activity.
RISKS RELATED TO FINANCIAL UNCERTAINTY
You should not rely on our quarterly results of operations as an indication of our future results.
Due to the unpredictability of the technology spending environment, among other reasons, our revenue and operating results have fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate. We base our current and projected future expense levels, in part, on our estimates of future revenue. Our expenses are, to a large extent, fixed in the short term. Accordingly, we may not be able to adjust our spending quickly enough to protect our projected operating results for a quarter if our revenue in that quarter falls short of our expectations. If, among other considerations, our future operating results fall below expectations of securities analysts or investors or we are unable to increase or maintain profitability, the market price of our common stock may decline.
Our stock price has been volatile historically and may continue to be volatile. Further, the sale of our common stock by significant stockholders may cause the price of our common stock to decrease.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations. Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, such as quarterly variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors, announcements relating to strategic decisions, announcements related to key personnel, customer purchase delays, service disruptions, changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts, the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable to us and news reports relating to trends in our markets or general economic conditions.
In addition, several of our stockholders own significant portions of our common stock. If these stockholders were to sell all or a portion of their holdings of our common stock, then the market price of our common stock could be negatively impacted. The effect of such sales, or of significant portions of our stock being offered or made available for sale, could result in strong downward pressure on our stock price. Investors should be aware that they could experience significant short-term volatility in our stock if such stockholders decide to sell all or a portion of their holdings of our common stock at once or within a short period of time.
We may lack the financial and operational resources needed to increase our market share and compete effectively.
In the market for operating systems and applications, we face significant competition from larger companies with greater financial, operational and technical resources and name recognition than we have. Competitors, which offer hardware-independent multi-user operating systems for Intel platforms and/or Linux and UNIX-based operating systems, include Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft), Oracle, Novell Inc. (Novell), IBM, Sun and HP. We may lack the resources needed to compete successfully with our current competitors as well as potential new competitors. Moreover, we compete in certain areas with our strategic partners and potential strategic partners, and this may adversely impact our relationship with an individual partner or a number of partners. Competitive pressures could affect prices or demand for our products and services, resulting in reduced profit margins and loss of market opportunity. We may have to lower the prices of our products and services to stay competitive, which could affect our margins and financial condition. In addition, if our pricing and other factors are not sufficiently competitive, we may lose market share. Industry consolidation may also effect competition by creating larger and potentially stronger competitors in the markets in which we compete, which may have an adverse effect on our business.
In the market for services offerings, we face significant competition from larger companies, including those that currently provide service and training related to the Linux operating system as well as other operating systems, particularly UNIX-based operating systems, due to the fact that Linux-and UNIX-based operating systems share many common features. These larger companies, including IBM, Oracle, Novell and HP, may be able to leverage their existing service organizations and provide higher levels of consulting and training on a more cost-effective basis than we can. We may not be able to compete successfully with our current or potential competitors.
During fiscal 2007, several of our largest competitors made announcements relevant to markets in which we operate, including an announcement by Oracle to offer Linux support services and an announcement by Novell regarding an agreement with Microsoft to collaborate on technology, a cross covenant not to sue the other partys customers for patent infringement and an agreement by Microsoft to purchase and distribute coupons for SUSE Linux maintenance and support.
We may not be able to meet the financial and operational challenges that we will encounter as our international operations, which represented approximately 39.5 % of our total revenue for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, continue to expand.
Our international operations accounted for approximately 39.5% of total revenue for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008. As we expand our international operations, we may have difficulty managing and administering a globally-dispersed business and we may need to expend additional funds to, among other activities, reorganize our sales force and technical support services team, outsource general and administrative functions, staff key management positions, obtain additional information technology infrastructure and successfully localize software products for a significant number of international markets, which may negatively affect our operating results.
Additional challenges associated with the conduct of our business overseas that may negatively affect our operating results include:
Moreover, in many foreign countries, particularly in certain developing economies, it is not uncommon to engage in business practices that are prohibited by regulations applicable to us, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar laws. Although we have policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors and agents, as well as those companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, may take actions in violation of our policies and procedures. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies and procedures or the law, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any failure by us to effectively manage the challenges associated with the international expansion of our operations could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
We may be subject to greater tax liabilities.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the U.S. and in numerous foreign jurisdictions. Our domestic and foreign tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of revenue and expenses in different jurisdictions. Additionally, the amount of taxes paid is subject to our interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate. We are regularly subject to audits by tax authorities. While we endeavor to comply with all applicable tax laws, there can be no assurance that a governing tax authority will not have a different interpretation of the law than we do or that we will comply in all respects with applicable tax laws, which could result in additional taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these audits will not have an adverse effect on our results of operations in the period for which the review is made.
Because we recognize revenue from subscriptions for our service over the term of the subscription, downturns or upturns in sales may not be immediately reflected in our operating results.
We generally recognize subscription revenue from customers ratably over the term of their subscription agreements, which are generally 12 to 36 months. As a result, much of the revenue we report in each quarter is deferred revenue from subscription agreements entered into during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in subscriptions in any one quarter will not necessarily be fully reflected in the revenue in that quarter and will negatively affect our revenue in future quarters. In addition, we may be unable to adjust our cost structure to reflect this reduced revenue. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of our service may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods. Our subscription model also makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new customers must be recognized over the applicable subscription term.
If our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.
Under generally accepted accounting principles, we review our amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable include a decline in stock price and market capitalization, future cash flows and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined resulting in an adverse impact on our results of operations.
We may be exposed to potential risks if we do not have an effective system of disclosure controls or internal controls or fail on an ongoing basis to properly address Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
We must comply, on an on-going basis, with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), including those provisions that establish the requirements for both management and auditors of public companies with respect to reporting on internal control over financial reporting. We cannot be certain that measures we have taken, and will take, will be sufficient or timely completed to meet the Section 404 requirements on an on-going basis, or that we will be able to implement and maintain adequate disclosure controls and controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future, particularly in light of our rapid growth, international expansion and changes in our products and services, which are expected to result in on-going changes to our control systems and areas of potential risk.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls or internal control over financial reporting, including satisfaction of the requirements of Section 404 of SOX, we may not be able to accurately or timely report on our financial results or adequately identify and reduce fraud. As a result, the financial position of our
business could be harmed; current and potential future shareholders could lose confidence in us and/or our reported financial results, which may cause a negative effect on our trading price; and we could be exposed to litigation or regulatory proceedings, which may be costly or divert management attention.
We are exposed to fluctuations in the market values of our portfolio investments and in interest rates; impairment of our investments could harm earnings.
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities. Our debt securities are generally classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. For information regarding the sensitivity of and risks associated with the market value of portfolio investments and interest rates, see Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. Our investments in private companies are subject to risk of loss of investment capital. These investments are inherently risky because the markets for the technologies they have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. We could lose the value of our entire investment in these companies.
We are subject to risks of currency fluctuations and related hedging operations.
A portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Changes in exchange rates among other currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect our net revenue, operating expenses and operating margins. We cannot predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations. We have begun to use financial instruments, primarily forward purchase contracts to economically hedge U.S. dollar and other currency commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and fixed purchase obligations. If these hedging activities are not successful or we change or reduce these hedging activities in the future, we may experience significant unexpected expenses from fluctuations in exchange rates.
Our headquarters is currently located in a leased facility in Raleigh, North Carolina, which consists of approximately 120,000 square feet. In January 2002, we assumed this lease from an unrelated third party. The lease, which has an original term of 20 years, will expire on June 10, 2020. The annual rental expense under this lease is approximately $1.6 million. In March 2006, we assumed a second lease in Raleigh, North Carolina as part of our headquarters facilities. The second facility consists of approximately 25,000 square feet. The lease term will expire on February 28, 2017. In July 2007, we assumed a third lease in Raleigh, North Carolina further expanding our headquarters facilities. This third lease consists of an additional 25,000 square feet and will expire on February 28, 2017. The annual rental expense under the second and third leases is approximately $1.0 million.
In addition to our headquarters, we have leased office facilities in over 25 countries and more than 55 locations. Significant locations in North America include Atlanta, Georgia; Mountain View, California; Tysons Corner, Virginia; and Westford, Massachusetts. Significant locations in Latin America include Buenos Aires, Argentina and Sao Paulo, Brazil. Significant locations in Europe include Brno, Czech Republic; Cork, Ireland; Farnborough, United Kingdom; Munich, Germany; Nanterre, France and Stuttgart, Germany. Significant locations in Asia Pacific include offices in Beijing, China; Brisbane, Australia; Mumbai, India; Pune, India; Singapore and Tokyo, Japan. We believe that in all material aspects our properties have been satisfactorily maintained, are in good condition and are suitable for our operations.
Red Hat Professional Consulting, Inc., formerly PTI, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company acquired in February 2001, together with its former directors and some of its former principal shareholders, is a defendant in a suit brought by a former employee in DeKalb County Superior Court in Georgia (Case No. 00-CV-5509-8). The plaintiff asserts, among other things, slander, breach of a shareholder agreement and of various employment agreements and seeks monetary damages. Red Hat Professional Consulting, Inc. has filed an answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaims, denying all liability. All discovery in the matter is complete. On October 31, 2005, a hearing was held on defendants Third Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and the Court granted summary judgment on three of the claims. A pre-trial order was entered in the matter, and it was set for trial on December 11, 2006. However, the Court elected to delay trial for purposes of rehearing plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, and that hearing was held on December 11, 2006. On February 16, 2007, the Court issued an order in favor of plaintiff and against all defendants on plaintiffs claim that his stock option agreement had been breached. That order does not set forth a remedy. The order was appealed by the Defendants to the Georgia Court of Appeals, which on March 17, 2008, reversed the trial court, vacated the trial courts order, and remanded for further proceedings. The Company filed a timely motion to reconsider with the Georgia Court of Appeals questioning the line of cases upon which the decision was rendered and the standard the court indicated should be applied by the trial court in determining the issues on remand. That motion was denied. The Company has been indemnified, subject to certain limitations, in this matter by the former PTI shareholders; however, there is a possibility that any damage award in this case could, if upheld, exceed the limits of such indemnification. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
Commencing on or about March 2001, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a series of purported class action suits arising out of the Companys initial public offering and secondary offering. Approximately 310 other IPO issuers were named as defendants in similar class action complaints (together, the IPO Allocation Actions). On August 8, 2001, Chief Judge Michael Mukasey of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order that transferred all of the IPO Allocation Actions, including the complaints involving the Company, to one judge for coordinated pre-trial
proceedings (Case No. 21 MC 92). The plaintiffs contend that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing registration statements and prospectuses that contained materially false and misleading information and failed to disclose material information. Plaintiffs also challenge certain IPO allocation practices by underwriters and the lack of disclosure thereof in initial public offering documents. On April 19, 2002, plaintiffs filed amended complaints in each of the 310 consolidated actions, including the Red Hat action. The relief sought consists of unspecified damages, attorneys and expert fees and other unspecified costs. In October of 2002, the individual director and officer defendants of the Company were dismissed from the case without prejudice. In October of 2004, the District Court certified a class in six of the 310 actions (the focus cases) and noted that the decision is intended to provide strong guidance to all parties regarding class certification in the remaining cases. The Companys action is not one of the focus cases. On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the District Courts class certification with respect to the focus cases and remanded the matter for further consideration. In September 2007, discovery moved forward in the the focus cases and plaintiff filed and amended complaints against the focus case issuer and underwriter defendants. Defendants in the focus cases filed motions to dismiss the second amended complaints in November 2007, and filed their oppositions to plaintiffs motion for class certification in December 2007. The Company intends to defend itself vigorously in this matter. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful, and an adverse resolution of the lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position and results of operations in the period in which the lawsuit is resolved. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
Commencing on August 4, 2003, the Company filed suit against The SCO Group, Inc. (SCO) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware seeking a declaratory judgment that the Company is not infringing any of SCOs intellectual property rights (Civil Action No. 03-722-SLR). In addition, the Company has asserted claims against SCO under Delaware and federal law, including deceptive trade practices, unfair competition, tortious interference with prospective business opportunities, trade libel and violations of the Lanham Act. The Company contends that SCO has made false and misleading public statements in alleging that software code, in which SCO claims to own copyrights and trade secrets, was misappropriated and incorporated into the Companys product and that SCO has threatened legal action. On September 15, 2003, SCO filed a motion to dismiss contending, among other things, that no actual controversy exists and that the declaratory judgment that the Company seeks would not be warranted. On April 6, 2004, the Court denied SCOs motion to dismiss but stayed further action in the case pending resolution of litigation underway in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah between SCO and IBM. On April 20, 2004, Red Hat filed a motion for reconsideration contending that a stay based on the Utah case would be inappropriate. On March 31, 2005, the Court denied the Companys motion to reconsider but extended to the Company the right to renew the motion should matters materially change in the SCO v. IBM litigation. SCO filed for bankruptcy protection in the District of Delaware on September 14, 2007, and on September 17, 2007 SCO filed a Notice in the pending case referencing the automatic stay in bankruptcy and asking the court to take the case off its active calendar. On October 15, 2007, SCO filed a schedule in the bankruptcy proceeding, listing Red Hats claim as disputed and unliquidated. On April 18, 2008, Red Hat filed a proof-of-claim in the bankruptcy proceeding.
In the summer of 2004, 14 class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and several of its former officers on behalf of investors who purchased the Companys securities during various periods from June 19, 2001 through July 13, 2004. All 14 suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. In each of the actions, plaintiffs seek to represent a class of purchasers of the Companys common stock during some or all of the period from June 19, 2001 through July 13, 2004. All of the claims arise in connection with the Company announcement on July 13, 2004 that it would restate certain of its financial statements (the Restatement). One or more of the plaintiffs assert that certain former officers (the Individual Defendants) and the Company violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Securities Exchange Act), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by issuing the financial statements that the Company subsequently restated. One or more of the plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, interest, costs, attorneys and experts fees, an accounting of certain profits obtained by the Individual Defendants from trading in the Companys common stock, disgorgement by the Companys chief executive officer and former chief
financial officer of certain compensation and profits from trading in the Companys common stock pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other relief. As of September 8, 2004, all of these class action lawsuits were consolidated into a single action referenced as Civil Action No. 5:04-CV-473BR and titled In re Red Hat, Inc. Securities Litigation. On May 6, 2005, the plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated class action complaint. On July 29, 2005, the Company, on behalf of itself and the Individual Defendants, filed a motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Also on that date, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), another defendant, filed a separate motion to dismiss. On May 12, 2006, the Court issued an order granting the motion to dismiss the Securities Exchange Act claims against several of the Individual Defendants, but denying the motion to dismiss the Securities Exchange Act claims against the Company, its former chief executive officer and chief financial officer. The Court dismissed the claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in their entirety, and also granted PwCs motion to dismiss. On November 6, 2006, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Subsequent to the filing of that motion, several plaintiffs withdrew as potential class representatives, and the Company opposed the certification of the remaining proposed class representatives. On May 11, 2007, the Court entered an order denying class certification and denying all other pending motions as moot. Thereafter, on July 13, 2007 Charles Gilbert filed a renewed motion for appointment as lead plaintiff and approval of selection of lead counsel. On November 13, 2007, the Court entered an Order allowing Gilberts motion, appointing him lead plaintiff and adding him as a party plaintiff and appointing lead counsel. On January 14, 2008, Gilberts counsel filed a motion to certify the action as a class action and briefing on the motion is proceeding. The Company intends to vigorously defend any remaining claims in this matter. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful, and an adverse resolution of the lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position and results of operations in the period in which the lawsuit is resolved. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
On June 26, 2006, FireStar Software, Inc. filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Civil Action No. 2-06CV-258), alleging that the Company and certain subsidiaries have directly and indirectly infringed FireStars U.S. Patent Number 6,101,502 by marketing, distributing, using and offering to provide support services for the JBoss Hibernate software. FireStar filed first, second, third and fourth amended complaints on October 19, 2006, November 8, 2006, June 24, 2007 and March 13, 2008, respectively. The fourth amended complaint seeks, among other relief, compensatory damages, enhanced damages, costs, attorneys fees and injunctive relief. The Company filed its answer to the fourth amended complaint on March 19, 2008. Discovery is currently underway and is scheduled to continue until September 2, 2008. Trial is scheduled to begin on or after January 5, 2009. Based on the Companys efforts to date, it believes it has meritorious defenses to this matter, and intends to vigorously defend itself. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in its defense, and an adverse resolution of the lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position and results of operation, including its ability to continue to commercialize the technologies implicated in the litigation. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
On October 4, 2007, Vanessa Simmonds, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington ( Civil Action No. C07-1587 JLR) against, among others, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., lead underwriters of the Companys initial public offering in August 1999. The complaint alleges that the combined number of shares of the Companys common stock beneficially owned by the underwriters and certain unnamed officers, directors and principal stockholders exceeded ten percent of the Companys outstanding common stock from the date of the Companys initial public offering on August 11, 1999, through at least August 10, 2000. It further alleges that those entities and individuals were thus subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) and the short-swing trading prohibition of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and failed to comply with those provisions. The complaint seeks to recover from the lead underwriters any short-swing profits obtained by them in violation of Section 16(b). The Company was named as a nominal defendant in the action. On February 28, 2008, plaintiff filed an amended complaint asserting substantially similar claims as those set forth in the initial complaint.
On October 9, 2007, IP Innovation, LLC and Technology Licensing Corporation filed a complaint in the Eastern District of Texas (Civil Action No. 2-07CV-447) against Red Hat, Inc. and Novell, Inc., alleging direct and indirect infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,072,412, 5,394,521 and 5,533,183. The complaint seeks, among other relief, compensatory damages, enhanced damages and injunctive relief. The Company answered the complaint on February 1, 2008, including counterclaims against plaintiffs for declaratory judgment of invalidity, unenforceability and noninfringement of the patents-in-suit, and the plaintiffs filed a reply to those counterclaims on February 11, 2008. Based on the Companys efforts to date, it believes it has meritorious defenses to this matter, and intends to vigorously defend itself. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in its defense, and an adverse resolution of the lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position and results of operations, including its ability to continue to commercialize the technologies implicated in the litigation. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
On April 21, 2008, DataTern, Inc. filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Civil Action No. 5-08CV-70) against the Company and one of its subsidiaries as well as 22 other defendants. The complaint alleges direct and indirect infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,937,402. The complaint seeks, among other relief, compensatory damages, enhanced damages, attorneys fees and injunctive relief. A first amended complaint was filed on April 22, 2008. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in its defense of the lawsuit, and an adverse resolution of the lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position and results of operations, including its ability to continue to commercialize the technologies implicated in the litigation. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the complaint.
The Company also experiences other routine litigation in the normal course of its business. The Company believes that the outcome of this routine litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position and results of operations.
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RHT. The chart below sets forth the high and low sales information for each of the quarters of the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007.
As of April 25, 2008, we estimate that there were 2,135 registered stockholders of record of our common stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that our future earnings will be retained for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total return (equal to dividends plus stock appreciation) during the period from February 28, 2003 through February 29, 2008 for:
We are required to provide a line-graph presentation comparing cumulative, five-year stockholder returns on an indexed basis with a broad equity market index and either a published industry index or an index of peer companies selected by Red Hat. In our index of peer group companies, we have selected peer companies considered to be peers for purposes of benchmarking executive compensation during the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008.
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE
TOTAL RETURN AMONG RED HAT, INC, COMPETITIVE
PEER GROUP, AND NYSE COMPOSITE INDEX
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below sets forth information regarding the Companys purchases of its Common Stock during its fourth fiscal quarter ended February 29, 2008:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth selected financial data for each of the Companys fiscal years in the five year period ended February 29, 2008. The selected financial data for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008, February 28, 2007 and February 28, 2006 are derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, related notes and other financial information included herein.
We are a global leader in providing open source software solutions to the enterprise, including our core enterprise operating system platform, Red Hat Enterprise Linux and enterprise middleware platform, JBoss Enterprise Middleware and other Red Hat enterprise technologies.
Open source software is an alternative to proprietary software and represents a different model for the development and licensing of commercial software code than that typically used for proprietary software. Because open source software code is freely shared, there are customarily no licensing fees for the distribution of the open source software. Therefore, we do not recognize revenue from the licensing of the code itself. We provide value to our customers through the aggregation, integration, testing, certification, delivery, maintenance and support of our Red Hat enterprise technologies, and by providing a level of scalability, stability and accountability for the enterprise technologies we package and distribute. Moreover, because communities of developers not employed by us assist with the creation of our open source offerings, opportunities for further innovation of our offerings are supplemented by these communities.
We sell our enterprise technologies through subscriptions, and we recognize revenue over the period of the subscription agreements with our customers. In addition, we generally provide certain managed services for each of our enterprise technologies, through Red Hat Network (RHN), JBoss Operations Network (JBoss ON) and JBoss Customer Support Portal (JBoss Support Portal), as a component of our subscriptions. We market our offerings primarily to enterprise customers including large enterprises, government organizations, small and medium size businesses and educational institutions.
We have focused on introducing and gaining acceptance for Red Hat enterprise technologies that comprise our open source architecture. Since introducing our initial enterprise open source operating system platform, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, it has gained widespread independent software vendor (ISV) and independent hardware vendor (IHV) support. We have continued to build our open source architecture by expanding our enterprise offerings and introducing new systems management services, middleware, integrated virtualization and clustering capability, file management systems, directory and certificate technologies and enhanced security functionality. We intend to bring the value of open source technology to other key areas of the enterprise infrastructure as the development community efforts support and customer needs dictate.
We derive our revenue and generate cash from customers primarily from two sources: (i) subscription revenue and (ii) training and services revenue. The arrangements with our customers that produce this revenue and cash are explained in further detail under Critical Accounting Policies below and in NOTE 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These arrangements typically involve subscriptions to Red Hat enterprise technologies. Our revenue is affected by, among other factors, corporate, government and consumer spending levels. In evaluating the performance of our business, we consider a number of factors, including total revenue, deferred revenue, operating income, operating margin and cash flows from operations.
On June 2, 2006 we acquired JBoss, Inc. (JBoss), an open source company whose main products are middleware offerings developed and designed for service-oriented architectures, permitting web-enabled applications to run on open source and other platforms.
Revenue. For the year ended February 29, 2008, total revenue increased 30.6% or $122.4 million to $523.0 million from $400.6 million for the year ended February 28, 2007. This increase resulted primarily from an increasing level of adoption of Red Hat Enterprise Linux as a primary computing platform by the larger enterprise customers, as well as growing penetration of the small and mid-sized business market and increased adoption of other Red Hat enterprise technologies. The success of our business model is influenced by the
acceptance and widespread deployment of our open source technologies, our ability to generate subscription revenue on a per installed system basis for Red Hat enterprise technology and our ability to increase annual average subscription revenue per customer by providing additional value to our customers in the form of additional technology infrastructure and by providing customers with additional services.
Deferred Revenue. Our deferred revenue, current and long-term, balance at February 29, 2008 was $472.9 million. Because of our subscription model and revenue recognition policies, deferred revenue improves predictability of future revenue. Deferred revenue at February 29, 2008 increased 39.6% as compared to the balance at February 28, 2007 of $338.6 million.
Subscriptions. Our enterprise technologies are sold under subscription agreements. These agreements typically have a one or three year subscription period. The subscription entitles the end user to maintenance, which generally consists of a specified level of support, as well as security updates, bug fixes, functionality enhancements and upgrades to the technology, when and if available, during the term of the subscription through our integrated management technologies, RHN, JBoss ON and JBoss Support Portal. Our customers have the ability to purchase higher levels of subscriptions that increase the level of support the customer is entitled to receive. Subscription revenue increased each quarter of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 and is being driven primarily by the increased market acceptance and use of open source software by the enterprise and our expansion of sales channels and geographic footprint during these periods.
Revenue by geography. We operate our business in three geographic regions: The Americas (U.S., Latin America and Canada); EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa); and Asia Pacific (principally Japan, Singapore, India, Australia, South Korea and China). In fiscal 2008, approximately $206.5 million or 39.5% of our revenue was generated outside the United States compared to approximately $144.6 million or 36.1% for fiscal 2007. Our international operations are expected to continue increasing as our international sales force and channels become more mature and as we enter new locations or expand our presence in existing locations. As of February 29, 2008, we had offices in more than 55 locations throughout the world.
Gross profit margin. Subscriptions made up 86.0% and 85.2% of total revenue for the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively. The gross profit margin on subscriptions was 92.5% and 92.0% for years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively. These two overall trends, the increased percentage of sales represented by subscriptions and improvements in the gross profit margin of subscriptions, resulted in the improvement of our overall gross profit margin to 84.6% for the year ended February 29, 2008 from 83.8% for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Income from operations. Operating income was 13.5% and 13.1% of total revenue for the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively. The increase in operating income as a percentage of revenue is a result of our increase in gross margin as described above. Operating expense as a percentage of revenue increased 0.3% to 71.1% for the year ended February 29, 2008 from 70.8% for the year ended February 28, 2007. Investments in research and development and investments in expanding our sales and marketing infrastructure resulted in increased operating costs as percentage of revenue of 0.9% and 0.4%, respectively. These investments in research and development and sales and marketing infrastructure were partially offset by efficiencies realized in our general and administrative functions. General and administrative costs as a percentage of revenue decreased 0.9% to 15.8% for the year ended February 29, 2008 from 16.7% for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Cash, cash equivalents, investments in debt securities and cash flow from operations. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments in debt securities balances at February 29, 2008 totaled $1.3 billion. During fiscal 2008, we generated $203.1 million in cash flow from operations primarily related to the increase in sales of subscriptions during the period. Our significant cash balance gives us a measure of flexibility to take advantage of opportunities such as acquisitions, increasing investment in international areas and purchasing our own common stock and debt securities.
In our fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, we focused on, and expect in fiscal 2009 to continue to focus on, among other things, (i) gaining widespread acceptance and deployment by the enterprise of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and of JBoss Enterprise Middleware, (ii) generating increasing subscription revenue by renewing subscriptions and providing additional value to our customers and by growing the number of enterprise technologies that comprise our open source architecture and (iii) generating increased revenue by providing additional systems management, developer and other services as well as from additional market penetration through a broader and deeper set of channel partner relationships, including OEMs, and our own international expansion, among other means.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our critical accounting policies include the following:
We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP 97-2), as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-4, Deferral of the Effective Date of a Provision of SOP 97-2, and Statement of Position No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, as amended by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104. We establish persuasive evidence of an arrangement for each type of revenue transaction based on either a signed contract with the end customer, a click-through contract on our website whereby the customer agrees to our standard subscription terms, signed or click-through distribution contracts with OEMs and other resellers, or, in the case of individual training seats, through receipt of payment which indicates acceptance of our training agreement terms.
Subscription revenue is comprised of direct and indirect sales of Red Hat enterprise technologies. Accounts receivable and deferred revenue are recorded at the time a customer enters into a binding subscription agreement for the purchase of a subscription, subscription services are made available to the customer and the customer is billed. The deferred revenue amount is recognized as revenue ratably over the life of the subscription. Red Hat enterprise technologies are generally offered with either one or three-year base subscription periods; the majority of our subscriptions have one-year terms. Under these subscription agreements, renewal rates are generally specified for one or three year renewal terms. The base subscription generally entitles the end user to the technology itself and post contract customer support (PCS), generally consisting of a specified level of customer support and security errata, bug fixes, functionality enhancements to the technology and upgrades to new versions of the technologies, each on a when-and-if available basis, during the term of the subscription. We sell our open source technologies through two principal channels: (1) direct, which includes sales by our sales force as well as web store sales, and (2) indirect, which includes distributors, resellers and OEMs. We recognize revenue from the sale of Red Hat enterprise technologies ratably over the period of the subscription beginning on the commencement date of the subscription agreement.
Subscription arrangements with large enterprise customers often have contracts with multiple elements (e.g., software technology, maintenance, training, consulting and other services). We allocate revenue to each element of the arrangement based on vendor-specific objective evidence of its fair value when we can demonstrate sufficient evidence of the fair value of at least those elements that are undelivered. The fair value of each element in multiple element arrangements is created by either (i) providing the customer with the ability during the term of the arrangement to renew that element at the same rate paid for the element included in the initial term of the agreement or (ii) selling the services on a stand-alone basis.
Training and services revenue
Training and services are comprised of revenue for consulting, engineering and customer training and education services. Consulting services consist of time-based arrangements, and revenue is recognized as these services are performed. Engineering services represent revenue earned under fixed fee arrangements with our OEM partners and other customers to provide for significant modification and customization of our Red Hat
enterprise technologies. We recognize revenue for these fixed fee engineering services using the percentage of completion basis of accounting, provided we have the ability to make reliable estimates of progress towards completion, the fee for such services is fixed or determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Under the percentage of completion method, earnings under the contract are recognized based on the progress toward completion as estimated using the ratio of labor hours incurred to total expected project hours. Changes in estimates are recognized in the period in which they are known. Revenue for customer training and education services is recognized on the dates the services are complete.
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
We test goodwill for impairment annually in accordance with Statement of Financial Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 142 requires goodwill be tested at least annually using a two-step process that begins with identifying potential impairment. Potential impairment is identified if the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill applies is less than the recognized or book value of the related reporting entity, including such goodwill. Where the book value of a reporting entity, including related goodwill, is greater than the reporting entitys fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. For the years ended February 29, 2008, February 28, 2007 and February 28, 2006, we did not identify any potential impairment related to our goodwill.
We evaluate the recoverability of our property and equipment and other long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired, and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions. An impairment loss is recognized when the net book value of such assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets or the business to which the assets relate. We perform this assessment on an annual basis, typically during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the assets. No significant impairment losses were recognized during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006. For further discussion see NOTE 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective March 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), using the modified-prospective transition method. Under the modified-prospective method, compensation costs include (a) compensation cost for all share-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, March 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation (SFAS 123) and (b) compensation costs for all share-based awards granted on or subsequent to March 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R.
In applying SFAS 123R, we are required to make estimates and assumptions with regards to the number of share-based awards that we expect will ultimately vest and the amount of tax benefits we expect will ultimately be realized, among other things. The amount of share-based awards that actually vest and the amount of tax benefits from share-based awards actually realized may differ significantly from our estimates. For further discussion, see NOTE 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deferred taxes and uncertain tax positions
We account for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 109, Accounting for Income Taxes as modified by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities and for tax carryforwards at enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. During the year ended February 29, 2008, we recorded a net tax expense of $47.9 million, which was net of a tax benefit of approximately $4.1 million from foreign tax credits and a tax benefit of approximately $2.0 million from the reduction of a valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset from research tax credits. The reduction of the valuation allowance resulted from managements determination that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset from research tax credits will be realized.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R, the benefit of the deferred tax asset attributable to U.S. net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards from share-based compensation expense deductions, generated prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, are being recognized as and only to the extent that taxes payable are reduced. As these deferred tax assets attributable to NOLs from share-based compensation expense deductions are realized, the benefit of the deferred tax asset is recorded in additional paid in capital.
We continue to assess the realizability of our deferred tax assets, which primarily consist of NOLs from share-based compensation expense deductions in the United States. In assessing the realizability of these deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. As of February 29, 2008, the net deferred tax asset balance was $119.3 million, of which $58.8 is offset by a valuation allowance. We continue to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets with respect to NOLs attributable to certain share-based compensation expense deductions related to excess tax benefits recognized prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, certain foreign NOLs and an acquired NOL carryforward that is subject to a limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. It is our policy to invest the earnings of foreign subsidiaries indefinitely outside the U.S. From time to time however, we remit a portion of these earnings to the extent we do not incur additional U.S. tax and it is otherwise feasible.
Our effective tax rate could be affected by, among other things, changes in the mix of earnings and losses in countries with differing statutory tax rates and certain share-based compensation expenses arising from SFAS 123R.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing a comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken by us on our tax returns. We adopted FIN 48 effective March 1, 2007. Our unrecognized tax benefits were $27.4 million as of adoption, March 1, 2007 and $35.9 million as of February 29, 2008. Our unrecognized tax benefits at adoption and at February 29, 2008, which, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate were $12.8 million and $14.3 million, respectively. The cumulative effects of adopting FIN 48 are further explained in NOTE 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Because tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations, significant judgment is required. As a result, we make certain estimates and assumptions, in (i) calculating our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, (ii) determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets and (iii) evaluating the amount of unrecognized tax benefits, as well as the interest and penalties related to such uncertain tax positions. Our estimates and assumptions may differ significantly from tax benefits ultimately realized.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
The following table is a summary of our results of operations for the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 (in thousands, except percentages):
Subscription revenue, which is primarily comprised of direct and indirect sales of Red Hat enterprise technologies, increased by 31.8% or $108.6 million to $449.8 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $341.2 million for the same period ended February 28, 2007. The increase in subscription revenue is primarily being driven by subscriptions to our principal enterprise technology, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, which has gained broader market acceptance in mission critical areas of computing and our international expansion. The increase is, in part, a result of the continued migration of larger enterprises to our open source platform from a proprietary Unix platform. We expect subscription revenue to continue an upward trend with the increased market acceptance for our offerings and with our continued international expansion.
Training and services revenue
Training revenue includes fees paid by our customers for delivery of educational materials and instruction. Services revenue includes fees for services received from customers for consulting regarding our offerings, deployment of Red Hat enterprise technologies and for delivery of added functionality to Red Hat Enterprise Linux or other technologies for our major customers and OEM partners. Training and services revenue increased by 23.2% or $13.8 million to $73.2 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $59.4 million for the same period ended February 28, 2007. Accordingly, consulting services revenue increased by 30.9% or $7.3 million. Training revenue increased 18.1% or $6.5 million as a result of continued demand for Red Hat Certified Engineers, Technicians and Architects following the introduction of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (RHEL 5). Additionally, we enabled more resellers to provide our training services which increased the availability of training classes. These trends are expected to continue as Red Hat Enterprise Linux and other open source technology subscription sales continue to grow.
Cost of revenue
Cost of subscription revenue
The cost of subscription revenue primarily consists of expenses we incur to support, distribute, manufacture and package Red Hat enterprise technologies. These costs include labor related cost to provide technical support and maintenance, as well as cost for fulfillment, physical media, literature, packaging and shipping. Cost of subscription revenue increased by 22.3% or $6.1 million to $33.6 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $27.5 million for the same period ended February 28, 2007. The increase is primarily the result of continued additions to our technical support staff to meet the demands of our growing subscriber base for support and maintenance. As the number of open source technology subscriptions continues to increase, we expect associated support cost will continue to increase, although we anticipate this will continue to occur at a rate slower than that of subscription revenue growth due to economies of scale.
Cost of training and services revenue
Cost of training and services revenue is mainly comprised of personnel and third party consulting costs for the design, development and delivery of custom engineering, training courses and professional services provided to various customers. Cost of training and services revenue increased by 26.3% or $9.8 million to $47.1 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $37.3 million for the same period ended February 28, 2007. Increased staffing to meet the growing demand for our professional services contributed $5.5 million to the overall increase. The cost to deliver training increased 21.8% or $4.5 million and includes increased use of outside contractors to deliver training which contributed $1.8 million, and increased employee compensation and related travel costs of $1.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As a result, cost of training and services revenue increased as a percentage of training and services revenue to 64.3% for the year ended February 29, 2008 from 62.7% for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Gross profit increased by 31.7% or $106.5 million to $442.4 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $335.9 million for the year ended February 28, 2007. Gross profit margin was 84.6% and 83.8% of total revenue for the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively. The increase in gross profit and gross profit margin was primarily due to the continued increase in revenue and profitability of our Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscription offerings. While we are selling an increased volume of subscriptions, the costs to deliver these subscriptions, as a percentage of subscription revenue, has decreased to 7.5% for the year ended February 29, 2008 from 8.0% for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Sales and marketing
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of salaries and other related costs for sales and marketing personnel, sales commissions, travel, public relations and marketing materials and trade shows. Sales and marketing expense increased by 31.9% or $46.5 million to $192.0 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $145.6 million for the year ended February 28, 2007. This increase was primarily due to a $40.3 million increase in selling costs of which $27.3 million relates to increased employee compensation, travel and recruiting expenses, primarily due to expansion of our sales force from the prior year. Further, costs related to technology infrastructure enhancements and incremental amortization expense related to identifiable intangibles, including licensing agreements, trademarks and customer reseller relationships increased $9.6 million. Marketing costs also increased by $6.1 million of which $4.7 million relates to increased marketing employee compensation costs. Increased advertising expense of $1.4 million results from product launches and increased channel marketing support. These increased investments to build our Red Hat sales force across a growing number of locations in anticipation of demand and to further support our brand throughout the world resulted in a slight increase of sales and marketing expense, as a percentage of revenue, to 36.7% for the year ended February 29, 2008 from 36.3% for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Research and development
Research and development expense consists primarily of personnel and related costs for development of software technologies and systems management offerings. Research and development expense increased by 37.1% or $26.4 million to $97.4 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $71.0 million for the year ended February 28, 2007. The increase in research and development costs resulted from both the additional expansion of our engineering group through direct hire and the acquisition of businesses and technologies. Employee compensation and related travel expenses increased by $17.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The expansion of our existing engineering group primarily relates to additional engineering resources to support the expansion of our product offerings and the localization of new and existing products into multiple languages and includes $1.9 million of incremental fees paid to external contractors. The remaining increase in research and development costs relate to technology infrastructure enhancements. Research and development expense was 18.6% and 17.7% of total revenue for the year ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively. Investing in research and development has been a priority for Red Hat and we anticipate continued spending as we expand our capabilities in virtualization and other technologies.
General and administrative
General and administrative expense consists primarily of personnel and related costs for general corporate functions, including finance, accounting, legal, human resources, facilities and information systems expense. General and administrative expense increased by 23.2% or $15.5 million to $82.5 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $67.0 million for the year ended February 28, 2007. Increased headcount across all functions to help the business scale increased employee compensation related costs by $4.8 million. Technology infrastructure enhancements including incremental depreciation and amortization charges increased $2.2 million. The remaining increase is primarily increased facilities costs of $3.8 million and professional service fees of $3.1 million. General and administrative expense was 15.8% and 16.7% of total revenue for the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively.
Other income, net
Other income, net consists of interest income earned on cash deposits in money market accounts and investments in short and long-term fixed income instruments, net gains realized on the sale of investments and foreign currency transaction and revaluation gains and losses. Other income, net increased by 39.6% or $17.1
million to $60.4 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 from $43.3 million for the year ended February 28, 2007. The increase is due to a $14.8 million increase in interest income and a $4.7 million gain on the sale of long-term strategic equity investments. The increase in interest income is primarily attributable to higher rates of return and higher cash and investment balances. The increase in other income is partially offset primarily by foreign currency transaction and revaluation losses which increased $1.5 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 as compared to the year ended February 28, 2007. For fiscal 2009, we anticipate that cash balances will continue to increase, however interest rate yields on our investments are expected to decline, resulting in reduced interest income.
Interest expense and the related amortization of deferred debt issuance costs associated with the convertible debentures totaled $5.9 million for each of the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007. Convertible debentures outstanding at February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 totaled $570 million. The slight increase in interest expense of $0.2 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 as compared to the year ended February 28, 2007 is due to imputed interest on contractual payment obligations related to technology purchased during the first quarter or fiscal 2008.
During the year ended February 29, 2008, we recorded $47.9 million of income tax expense, which resulted in an annual effective tax rate of 38.4%. Our effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and the foreign income taxed at different rates. The provision for income tax for the year ended February 29, 2008 consists of $42.3 million of U.S. income tax expense and $5.6 million of foreign income tax. During the year ended February 28, 2007 we recorded $29.7 million of income tax expense, which resulted in an annual effective tax rate of 33.1%. Our annual effective tax rate for the year ended February 28, 2007 differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the reversal of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets. The provision for income tax expense for the year ended February 28, 2007, consists of approximately $28.2 million of U.S. income tax expense and approximately $1.5 million of foreign income tax expense.
Years ended February 28, 2007 and February 28, 2006
The following table is a summary of our results of operations for the years ended February 28, 2007 and February 28, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):
Subscription revenue increased by 48.1% or $110.8 million to $341.2 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $230.4 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. The increase in subscription revenue is primarily being driven by subscriptions to our principal enterprise technology, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, which has gained broader market acceptance in mission critical areas of computing and our international expansion. The increase is, in part, a result of the continued migration of larger enterprises in industries such as financial services to our open source platform from a proprietary Unix platform. JBoss offerings, included in the above results from the date of acquisition of JBoss Inc., contributed $16.8 million in subscription revenue for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Training and services revenue
Training and services revenue increased by 24.1% or $11.5 million to $59.4 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $47.9 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. The adoption of Linux and other open source technologies as a primary computing platform increases the need for training and consulting services. Accordingly, training revenue increased by 12.9% or $4.1 million as a result of continued demand for Red Hat Certified Engineers, Technicians and Architects. Additionally, we enabled more resellers to provide our training services which increased the availability of training classes. Services revenue increased by 46.0% or $7.4 million. JBoss offerings, included in the above results from the date of acquisition, added $6.3 million to training and services revenue for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Cost of revenue
Cost of subscription revenue
Cost of subscription revenue increased by 30.7% or $6.5 million to $27.5 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $21.0 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. Costs to deliver JBoss offerings contributed $2.5 million to the overall increase. The remaining increase is primarily the result of continued additions to our technical support staff to meet the demands of our growing subscriber base.
Cost of training and services revenue
Cost of training and services revenue increased by 35.5% or $9.8 million to $37.3 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $27.5 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. Costs to deliver JBoss offerings contributed $2.8 million to the overall increase. Also contributing to the increase is $1.4 million of compensation cost related to share-based awards which, prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2007, we reported on a pro-forma basis in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The remaining difference is related to the increased use of outside contractors and the increased rental of off-premise training facilities to meet the growing demand for our training courses in an increased number of locations. As well we used a greater number of outside contractors to meet the growing demand for our professional services.
Gross profit increased by 46.2% or $106.1 million to $335.9 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $229.8 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. Gross profit margin was 83.8% and 82.6% of total revenue for the years ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in gross profit and gross profit margin was primarily due to the continued increase in revenue and profitability of our Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscription offerings. While we are selling an increased volume of subscriptions, the costs to deliver these subscriptions, as a percentage of subscription revenue, has decreased to 8.0% for the year ended February 28, 2007 from 9.1% for the same period ended February 28, 2006. This is in part due to scale and efficiencies resulting from advancements in our packaging and shipping processes which allow us to deliver more of our subscriptions via lower cost electronic delivery when compared to box delivery.
Sales and marketing
Sales and marketing expense increased by 71.8% or $60.8 million to $145.6 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $84.7 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. This increase was primarily due to a $33.4 million increase in sales compensation and related $2.9 million in travel costs primarily due to recent acquisitions of businesses and an organic expansion of our dedicated sales force from the prior year. The increased sales compensation cost includes an additional $7.0 million of compensation cost related to share-based awards which, prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2007, we reported on a pro-forma basis in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Marketing costs also increased by $13.6 million of which $5.4
million relates to additional advertising expenses and promotional sponsorships primarily focused on our major partners and $6.5 million related to increased marketing compensation costs, including $2.0 million for share-based awards which, prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2007, were previously reported on a pro-forma basis in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The remaining increase in sales and marketing costs relate to technology infrastructure enhancements and incremental amortization expense related to recently acquired identifiable intangibles, including licensing agreements, trademarks and customer reseller relationships. These increased investments to build our Red Hat brand across a growing number of locations throughout the world resulted in an increase of sales and marketing expense, as a percentage of revenue, from 30.4% for the year ended February 28, 2006 to 36.3% for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Research and development
Research and development expense increased by 73.8% or $30.2 million to $71.0 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $40.9 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. The increase in research and development costs resulted from both the additional expansion of our engineering group through direct hire and the acquisition of businesses. Related compensation expenses increased by $24.8 million, including $7.2 million of compensation cost related to share-based awards which, prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2007, we reported on a pro-forma basis in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The expansion of our existing engineering group primarily relates to additional engineering resources to support the expansion of our product offerings and the localization of new and existing products into multiple languages. The remaining increase in research and development costs relate to technology infrastructure enhancements. Research and development expense was 17.7% and 14.7% of total revenue for the years ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Incremental research and development costs related to JBoss offerings and included in the above variances totaled $6.2 million.
General and administrative
General and administrative expense increased by 45.2% or $20.9 million to $67.0 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $46.1 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. Approximately $10.0 million is compensation cost related to share-based awards which, prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2007, we reported on a pro-forma basis in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. In addition, increased headcount across all functions to help the business scale increased non-share based compensation and travel by $7.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The remaining increase in general and administrative costs relates to technology infrastructure enhancements. General and administrative expense was approximately 16.7% of total revenue for each of the years ended February 28, 2007 and 2006.
Other income, net
Other income, net consists of interest income earned on cash deposits in money market accounts and investments in short and long-term fixed income instruments, gain on the extinguishment of certain long-term debt, net gains realized on the sale of investments and foreign currency revaluation gains and losses. Other income, net increased by 44.0% or $13.2 million to $43.3 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 from $30.1 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. The increase is primarily related to a $15.0 million increase in interest income which is partially offset by a reduction of $3.1 million net gain recognized on the extinguishment of long-term debt during the year ended February 28, 2006. The increase in interest income is primarily attributable to higher rates of return and higher cash and investment balances.
During the year ended February 28, 2007, interest expense decreased 1.7% or $0.1 million to $6.0 million from $6.1 million for the same period ended February 28, 2006. The decrease resulted from the repurchase of convertible debentures during the first half of fiscal 2006. Long-term convertible debentures outstanding at February 28, 2007 and 2006 totaled $570 million.
During the year ended February 28, 2007, we recorded approximately $29.7 million of income tax expense, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 33.1%. Our effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the reversal of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets. The provision for income tax expense for the year ended February 28, 2007, consists of approximately $28.2 million of U.S. income tax expense and approximately $1.5 million of foreign income tax expense. During the year ended February 28, 2006, we recorded $2.3 million of income tax expense, which resulted in an effective rate of 2.8%. Our effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to U.S. NOL carryforwards. The provision for income tax expense for the year ended February 28, 2006 consists of foreign income tax expense.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have historically derived a significant portion of our liquidity and operating capital from cash flows from operations as well as the sale of equity securities, including private sales of preferred stock and the sale of common stock in our initial and follow-on public offerings, the issuance of convertible debentures and borrowings under working capital lines of credit. At February 29, 2008, we had total cash and investments of $1.3 billion, which was comprised of $677.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, $312.4 million of short-term, fixed-income investments and $341.8 million of long-term, fixed-income investments. This compares to total cash and investments of $1.2 billion at February 28, 2007.
Management believes that we currently have sufficient liquidity with $677.7 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand, and we presently do not intend to liquidate our short and long-term investments prior to their scheduled maturity dates. However, in the event that we did liquidate these investments prior to their scheduled maturities and there were adverse changes in market interest rates or the overall economic environment, we could be required to recognize a realized loss on those investments when we liquidate. At February 29, 2008, we have an unrealized gain of $5.3 million on our investments in debt securities compared to an unrealized loss of $2.1 million at February 28, 2007.
Year ended February 29, 2008
At February 29, 2008, cash and cash equivalents totaled $677.7 million, an increase of $150.5 million as compared to February 28, 2007. The increase in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended February 29, 2008 is a result of cash generated by operating activities which contributed $203.1 million and cash provided by financing activities, primarily excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements of $61.2 million and proceeds of $15.5 million from employees exercise of common stock options. These cash inflows were partially offset by treasury share purchases of $67.2 million, investments in property and equipment of $41.8 million, net purchases of investment securities of $17.2 million and acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired, which totaled $11.8 million for the year ended February 29, 2008.
Change in presentation of cash flows resulting from the adoption of SFAS 123R
SFAS 123R requires that the portion of income tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of a share-based awards original grant date fair value, the excess tax benefits, be presented as a source of cash flow from financing activities. Prior to our adoption of SFAS123R in fiscal 2007, had we realized such excess tax benefits from the exercise of share-based awards, we would have presented these excess tax benefits as a source of cash flow from operating activities. For the year ended February 29, 2008, we recognized $61.2 million of excess income tax benefits from share-based awards, of which $58.4 million resulted from tax NOL carryforwards related to share-based compensation expense deductions. For the year ended February 28, 2007, we recognized $16.0 million of excess tax benefits from share-based awards of which only $10.2 million resulted
from the utilization of tax NOL carryforwards related to share-based compensation expense deductions as we primarily used our remaining NOL carryforwards, which were not related to share-based compensation, to offset taxable income.
Cash flows from operations
Cash provided by operations of $203.1 million during the year ended February 29, 2008 includes net income of $76.7 million, adjustments to exclude the impact of non-cash revenue and expenses, which totaled a $110.0 million net source of cash, and changes in working capital, which totaled a $77.7 million net source of cash, resulting from an increase in deferred revenue of $113.1 million, which is partially offset by increased working capital investments related to accounts receivables and prepaid expenses which totaled $33.7 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The increase in deferred revenue is due to growth in billings as we generally bill our customers in advance of subscription periods. This increase in deferred revenue of $113.1 million is net of foreign currency impact and deferred revenue balances acquired from businesses purchased during the year ended February 29, 2008. Partially offsetting these sources of operating cash flow were excess tax benefits of $61.2 million related to share-based compensation, which, since our adoption of SFAS 123R are classified as cash flows from financing activities, as described above.
Cash flows from investing
Cash used in investing activities of $70.2 million for the year ended February 29, 2008 includes purchases of investment securities which totaled $1,173.0 million, payments (net of cash acquired) related to business acquisitions of $11.8 million, investments in property and equipment, primarily information technology infrastructure of $41.8 million and investments in purchased technology and patents of $5.6 million. Partially offsetting these investments were proceeds from maturities of investment securities of $1,155.9 million and proceeds from sale of strategic equity investments which totaled $6.2 million for the year ended February 29, 2008.
Cash flows from financing
Cash provided by financing activities of $11.7 million for year ended February 29, 2008 is comprised of $61.2 million from excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation, $15.5 million in proceeds from employees exercise of common stock options and $2.9 million of borrowings related to investments made in purchased technology. Partially offsetting cash provided by financing activities were purchases of treasury stock under our previously announced share repurchase program which totaled $66.1 million for the year ended February 29, 2008, payments on other borrowings of $0.8 million and purchases of treasury shares from employees to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations of $1.1 million related to restricted stock awards vesting during the year ended February 29, 2008.
Year ended February 28, 2007
At February 28, 2007, cash and cash equivalents totaled $527.2 million, an increase of $259.7 million as compared to February 28, 2006. The increase in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended February 28, 2007 resulted from maturities of investment securities of $781.5 million, cash from operations which contributed $201.6 million, excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements of $16.0 million, other net proceeds of $23.0 million from employee-related stock transactions and proceeds from structured stock repurchase transactions of $1.5 million. Partially offsetting these cash increases were purchases of investment securities of $592.7 million, payments made for acquisitions of businesses which totaled $149.9 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 and purchases of property and equipment of $22.6 million for the same period. Effects of foreign currency exchange rates resulted in an increase to cash of approximately $1.4 million for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Change in presentation of cash flows resulting from the adoption of SFAS 123R
For the year ended February 28, 2007, we recognized $24.5 million of income tax benefits from share-based awards, of which $16.0 million resulted from tax deductions in excess of the original grant date fair value of the awards. Prior to our adoption of SFAS123R beginning March 1, 2006, had we realized such excess tax benefits from the exercise of share-based awards, we would have presented these excess tax benefits as a source of cash flow from operating activities. For further discussion, see NOTE 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash flows from operations
Cash provided by operations of $201.6 million during the year ended February 28, 2007 includes net income of $59.9 million, adjustments to exclude the impact of non-cash revenue and expenses, which totaled $72.3 million net source of cash, and changes in working capital, which totaled $85.3 million net source of cash, primarily resulting from an increase in deferred revenue of $90.4 million. The increase in deferred revenue is due to growth in billings as we generally bill our customers in advance of subscription periods. Partially offsetting these sources of operating cash flow were excess tax benefits of $16.0 million related to share-based compensation, which, since our adoption of SFAS 123R are classified as cash flows from financing activities, as described above.
Cash flows from investing
Cash provided by investing activities of $16.7 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 includes maturities of investment securities of $781.5 million. Partially offsetting theses maturities were purchases of investment securities which totaled $592.7 million, payments, net of cash acquired, related to business acquisitions of $149.9 million, which includes our recent acquisition of JBoss, businesses in Brazil and Argentina and the acquisition of the remaining minority interest related to our joint venture in India. Also partially offsetting these maturities were investments in property and equipment, primarily information technology infrastructure, which totaled $22.6 million for the year ended February 28, 2007.
Cash flows from financing
Cash provided by financing activities of $40.0 million for the year ended February 28, 2007 is primarily comprised of $24.3 million in proceeds from employees exercise of common stock options, $16.0 million from excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation and proceeds from structured stock repurchase transactions of $1.5 million. Partially offsetting proceeds from these sources were repurchases of shares related to employee and non-employee directors withholding taxes of $1.7 million.
As of February 29, 2008, we had $570 million in convertible senior debentures outstanding. The debentures mature on January 15, 2024 and bear interest at a rate of 0.5% per annum, payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The debentures are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock under certain circumstances prior to maturity at a conversion rate of 39.0753 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures (which represents a conversion price of approximately $25.59 per share) subject to adjustment under certain conditions. We may redeem the debentures, in whole or in part, in cash at any time on or after January 15, 2009. Holders of the debentures may require us to redeem the debentures, in whole or in part, in cash on January 15 of 2009, 2014 and 2019. As a result, the debentures are classified as a current liability as of February 29, 2008. As of February 29, 2008, no debentures were redeemed. Accrued interest to the redemption date will be paid by us in any such redemption. Accrued interest at February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 was $0.4 million.
We have experienced a substantial increase in our operating expenses since our inception in connection with the growth of our operations, the development of our enterprise technologies, the expansion of our services operations and our acquisition activity. Our capital requirements during the year ending February 28, 2009 will depend on numerous factors, including the amount of resources we devote to:
We have utilized, and will continue to utilize, cash and investments to fund, among other potential uses, purchases of our common stock, purchases or redemption of our convertible debentures, purchases of fixed assets and mergers and acquisitions.
Given our historically strong operating cash flow and the $1.3 billion of cash and investments held at February 29, 2008, we do not presently anticipate the need to raise cash to fund our operations, either through the sale of additional equity or through the issuance of debt for the foreseeable future. However, we may take advantage of favorable capital market situations that may arise from time to time to raise additional capital.
We believe that cash flow from operations will improve; however, there can be no assurances that we will improve our cash flow from operations from the current rate or that such cash flows will be adequate to fund other investments or acquisitions that we may choose to make. We may choose to accelerate the expansion of our business from our current plans, which may require us to raise additional funds through the sale of equity or debt securities or through other financing means. There can be no assurances that any such financing would occur in amounts or on terms favorable to us, if at all.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
As of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, we have no off-balance sheet financing arrangements and do not utilize any structured debt, special purpose or similar unconsolidated entities for liquidity or financing purposes.
The following table summarizes our principal contractual obligations at February 29, 2008 (in thousands):
Because we are unable to reasonably estimate the timing of settlements and any future payments related to uncertain tax positions, such liabilities are not included in the above table. However, as of February 29, 2008, we have recognized a total of $18.0 million related to such liabilities, which are included in other long-term obligations.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand such effects on financial position, financial performance and cash flow. SFAS 161 is effective for us on December 1, 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS 161, but currently believe the adoption of SFAS 161 will not be significant.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R), which replaces Statement No. 141, Business Combination (SFAS 141). SFAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141 but broadens its scope to include all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over another and improves the recognition and measurement of identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests of the acquiree. SFAS 141R will apply prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after March 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 141R on prospective acquisitions.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS160). SFAS 160 (i) clarifies the definition of noncontrolling interest, (ii) requires the noncontrolling interest to be reported as a component of equity rather than reported as a liability or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity and (iii) changes the presentation on the consolidated statement of operations of the income attributable to the noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160 will be effective for us on March 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively, except for presentation and disclosure requirements which will be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 160 but believe the adoption of SFAS 160 will not be significant.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS159). SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159 will be effective for us on March 1, 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS 159 but currently believe the adoption of SFAS 159 will not be significant.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value within accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., clarifies the definition of fair value within that framework and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, the definition of fair value in SFAS 157 may affect assumptions used by companies in determining fair value. We were required to adopt SFAS 157 on March 1, 2008. We have not yet completed our evaluation of the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS 157, but currently believe the adoption of SFAS 157 will not require significant modification of our fair value measurements and will be substantially limited to expanded disclosures in the our notes to the consolidated financial statements.
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes, foreign currency fluctuations and changes in the market value of our investments.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal and liquidity while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments in a variety of fixed-income securities, including both government and corporate obligations and money market funds. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in prevailing interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates, or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities which have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. A hypothetical one percentage point change in interest rates would result in a $11.9 million change in interest income on an annual basis.
Our convertible debentures are at a fixed interest rate and therefore interest expense is not impacted by a change in rates. The fair market value of the debentures is subject to interest rate risk and market risk due to the convertible feature of the debentures. Generally the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt increases as interest rates fall and decreases as interest rates rise. The fair market value of debt with conversion features permitting conversion into the issuers stock, like our debentures, also generally increases as the market price of the underlying stock increases and decreases as the market price falls, assuming constant market interest rates. Interest and market value changes affect the fair market value of our debentures but do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. The fair value of the debentures was approximately $568.7 million and $609.6 million based on quoted market prices as of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively.
The fair market value of our investment portfolio is subject to interest rate risk. Based on a sensitivity analysis performed on this investment portfolio, a hypothetical one percentage point increase in prevailing interest rates would result in an approximate $4.1 million and $7.3 million decrease in the fair value of our available-for-sale investment securities as of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively.
During the year ended February 29, 2008 we entered into a forward contract with a global financial institution to hedge foreign currency exposure associated with a Japanese Yen denominated transaction. At February 29, 2008, the forward contract is recorded on the balance sheet at fair market value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. We have elected not to qualify the forward contract for hedge accounting treatment and as a result, changes in the fair value of the forward contract, which totaled $0.4 million for the year ended February 29, 2008, are included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The notional amount of the outstanding forward contract at February 29, 2008 was $16.7 million. The fair value of the outstanding forward contract at February 29, 2008 was a $0.4 million asset and is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
We did not hold derivative financial instruments at February 28, 2007.
Foreign Currency Risk
Approximately 39.5% of our revenue for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 were produced by sales outside the United States. We are exposed to significant risks of foreign currency fluctuation primarily from receivables denominated in foreign currency and are subject to transaction gains and losses, which are recorded as a component in determining net income. The income statements of our non-U.S. operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates for each applicable month in a period. To the extent the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions results in increased revenue, operating expenses and net income for our non-U.S. operations. Similarly, our revenue, operating expenses and net income will decrease for our non-U.S. operations if the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies. Using the average foreign currency exchange rates from fiscal 2007, our revenue from non-U.S. operations for the year ended February 29, 2008 would have been lower than we reported using the exchange rates for fiscal 2008 by approximately $13.5 million. Additionally, the assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. operations are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect as of the applicable balance sheet dates, while related revenue and expense accounts of these operations are translated at average exchange rates during the month in which related transactions occur. Translation gains and losses are included as an adjustment to stockholders equity and included in other comprehensive income. For further discussion, see NOTE 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report based on the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, which has audited the financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report, has also audited the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008, as stated in their report, which is included below.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Red Hat, Inc.:
We have completed integrated audits of Red Hat, Inc.s consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Red Hat, Inc. and its subsidiaries at February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 29, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing in Item 8. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for uncertain tax positions for the year ended February 29, 2008 and for share-based compensation in the year ended February 28, 2007.
Internal control over financial reporting
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousandsexcept share and per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
RED HAT, INC.
(in thousandsexcept per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS