|
|
 | | | |
- close
- close
- close
- close
This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-Q filed Jun 10, 2009. Long-lived assets.
We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An
impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of
an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results
differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required
in the future. In the course of performing our analysis, we determined that no
long-lived asset impairment charges were required for the three month periods
ended May 2, 2009 and May 3, 2008.
These excerpts taken from the ROST 10-K filed Mar 31, 2009. Long-lived assets.
We record a long-lived asset impairment
charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash
flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted
cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group.
If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment
charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing our annual
analysis, we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charge was required
for fiscal 2008, 2007, or 2006.
Long-lived assets. We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing our annual analysis, we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charge was required for fiscal 2008, 2007, or 2006. This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-Q filed Dec 10, 2008. Long-lived
assets. We record a long-lived asset
impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated
future cash flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if the undiscounted
cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group.
If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment
charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing our analysis,
we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charges were required for the
nine month periods ended November 1, 2008 and November 3, 2007.
This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-Q filed Sep 10, 2008. Long-lived assets.
We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An
impairment loss would be recognized if the undiscounted cash flow of an asset
group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results
differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required
in the future. In the course of performing our analysis, we determined that no
long-lived asset impairment charges were required for the six month periods
ended August 2, 2008 and August 4, 2007.
This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-Q filed Jun 11, 2008. Long-lived assets.
We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An
impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of
an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results
differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required
in the future. In the course of performing our analysis, we determined that no
long-lived asset impairment charges were required in the three month periods
ended May 3, 2008 and May 5, 2007.
These excerpts taken from the ROST 10-K filed Apr 1, 2008. Long-lived assets.
We record a long-lived asset impairment
charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash
flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted
cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group.
If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment
charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing our annual
analysis, we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charge was required
for fiscal 2007, 2006, or 2005.
Long-lived assets. We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing our annual analysis, we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charge was required for fiscal 2007, 2006, or 2005. This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-Q filed Dec 12, 2007. Long-lived
assets. We record a long-lived asset
impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated
future cash flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the
undiscounted cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the
asset group. If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an
impairment charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing
this analysis, we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charges were
required in the nine month periods ended November 3, 2007 and October 28,
2006.
This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-Q filed Sep 12, 2007. Long-lived assets. We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing this analysis, we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charge was required for the six months ended August 4, 2007 and July 29, 2006.
This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-Q filed Jun 13, 2007. Long-lived assets. We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required in the future. In the course of performing this analysis, we determined that no long-lived asset impairment charge was required for the three months ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006.
This excerpt taken from the ROST 10-K filed Apr 3, 2007. Long-lived assets. We record a long-lived asset impairment charge when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based on estimated future cash flows. An impairment loss would be recognized if analysis of the undiscounted cash flow of an asset group was less than the carrying value of the asset group. If our actual results differ materially from projected results, an impairment charge may be required in the future. During 2004, we recognized an impairment charge of $15.8 million before taxes to write-down the carrying value of our Newark Facility. In the course of performing our annual analysis, we determined that no other long-lived asset impairment charge was required for fiscal 2006, 2005, or 2004.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, typically ranging from five to twelve years for equipment and 20 to 40 years for real property. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the asset or the applicable lease term. 22 | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for ROST: |
| |||||||
