|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
These excerpts taken from the SWS 10-K filed Sep 5, 2008. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Shareholders SWS Group, Inc. We have audited SWS Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying managements report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. As described in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded M.L. Stern & Co., LLC from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2008, because it was acquired after the close of business on March 31, 2008. We have also excluded M.L. Stern & Co., LLC from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. M.L. Stern & Co., LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and net revenues represent 0.8% and 4.0%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended June 27, 2008. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial condition of the Company as of June 27, 2008 and June 29, 2007, the related statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 27, 2008, and the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15, and our report dated September 5, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and schedule. Grant Thornton LLP Dallas, Texas September 5, 2008
F-35
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial StatementsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px">Board of Directors and ShareholdersSWS Group, Inc. STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px">We have audited SWS Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2008, based on criteriaestablished in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying managements report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public SIZE="2">A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in SIZE="2">Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become As described in SIZE="2">In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of Dallas, Texas STYLE="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px">September 5, 2008
F-35 Table of ContentsIndex to Financial StatementsThis excerpt taken from the SWS 10-K filed Sep 12, 2007. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To Board of Directors and Stockholders of SWS Group, Inc.: In our opinion, the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the fiscal year ended June 24, 2005 before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively reflect the stock split discussed in Note 1(a), the discontinued operations discussed in Note 1(v) and the change in the composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 25 present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of SWS Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended June 24, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (the 2005 consolidated financial statements before the effects of the adjustments discussed in Notes 1(a), (v) and 25 are not presented herein). In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule of Condensed Financial Information of Registrant for the fiscal year ended June 24, 2005 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit, before the effects of the adjustments described above, of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively reflect the stock split discussed in Note 1(a), the discontinued operations discussed in Note 1(v) and the change in the composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 25 and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by other auditors. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Dallas, Texas September 15, 2005
F-39
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the SWS 10-K filed Sep 13, 2006. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of SWS Group, Inc. In our opinion, the consolidated statement of financial condition as of June 24, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of two years in the period ended June 24, 2005 before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively reflect the discontinued operation discussed in Note 1(t) and the change in the composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 26, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SWS Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries at June 24, 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 24, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (the 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements before the effects of the adjustments discussed in Notes 1(t) and 26 are not presented herein). In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule of Condensed Financial Information of Registrant as of June 24, 2005 and for the each of the two years in the period ended June 24, 2005 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements before the effects of the adjustments described above. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit, before the effects of the adjustments described above, of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively reflect the discontinued operation discussed in Note 1(t) and the change in the composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 26 and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by other auditors. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Dallas, Texas September 15, 2005
F-38
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the SWS 10-K filed Sep 20, 2005. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To Board of Directors and Stockholders of SWS Group, Inc:
We have completed an integrated audit of SWS Group, Inc.s June 24, 2005 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of June 24, 2005 and audits of its June 25, 2004 and June 27, 2003 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements in the accompanying index, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SWS Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries at June 24, 2005 and June 25, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 24, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1(t), the Company has restated its financial statements for the years ended June 25, 2004 and June 27, 2003.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing in Part II, Controls and Procedures, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 24, 2005 based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 24, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on managements assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
F-36
Table of ContentsA companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Dallas, Texas September 15, 2005
F-37
Table of Contents | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||