SWS » Topics » Change of Control, Severance Agreements

This excerpt taken from the SWS DEF 14A filed Oct 8, 2009.

Change of Control, Severance Agreements

We do not currently have any separate change of control or severance agreements with any NEO. However, under certain of our compensation plans, there are provisions for change of control or terminations of the NEO.

 

31


Table of Contents

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, upon termination of the NEO’s employment, the vested account balance of the deferred compensation will be paid as a termination benefit. Upon a defined change of control, the NEO may receive a change of control benefit equal to the NEO’s vested account balance or have the account balance remain subject to the terms and conditions of the plan, depending on the election of the NEO at the time the NEO began participating in the plan. The payment of this benefit will not result in additional compensation expense to the company.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, a change of control is generally defined as: (1) Any consolidation, merger or share exchange of the company in which the company is not the continuing or surviving corporation; (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the company; (3) the stockholders of the company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the company; (4) the cessation of control (by virtue of their not constituting a majority of directors) of the Board by the individuals who (A) at the date of the plan were directors or (B) become directors after the date of the plan and whose election or nomination for election by the company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who were directors at the date of the plan or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved; or (5) the acquisition of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of an aggregate of 20% of the voting power of the company’s outstanding voting securities.

Under the Restricted Stock Plan, termination of an employee’s service under the plan (including, but not limited to, voluntary resignation or termination with or without cause) before the restricted shares become vested will result in those non-vested shares being forfeited. However, in the event of a change of control, as defined by the plan, or the death of an NEO (if set forth in the applicable award agreement), all outstanding awards will automatically vest.

Under the Restricted Stock Plan, a change of control is generally defined as: (1) any consolidation, merger or share exchange of the company in which the company is not the continuing or surviving corporation; (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the company; (3) the stockholders of the company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the company; (4) the cessation of control (by virtue of their not constituting a majority of directors) of the Board by the individuals who (A) were directors on November 12, 2003 or (B) become directors after such date and whose election or nomination for election by the company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who were directors at such date or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved; (5) the acquisition of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of an aggregate of 20% of the voting power of the company’s outstanding voting securities; or (6) in a Title 11 bankruptcy proceeding, the appointment of a trustee or the conversion of a case involving the company to a case under Chapter 7.

The table below represents the number of shares and the market value of those shares that would have vested had a change in control occurred as of June 26, 2009 using the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on June 26, 2009, or $13.53 per share:

 

Name

   Number of
Shares of
Stock that
Vest upon
Change in
Control (#)
   Market Value of
Shares of Stock
that Vest upon

Change
in Control ($)

Donald W. Hultgren

   40,882    $ 553,134

Kenneth R. Hanks

   8,705    $ 117,779

Daniel R. Leland

   4,663    $ 63,090

Richard H. Litton

   5,441    $ 73,617

James R. Ross

   7,959    $ 107,685

 

32


Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the SWS DEF 14A filed Oct 10, 2008.

Change of Control, Severance Agreements

Other than Mr. Hamick’s employment agreement, we do not currently have any separate change of control or severance agreements with any NEO. However, under certain of our compensation plans, there are provisions for change of control or terminations of the NEO.

 

18


Table of Contents

Under the deferred compensation plan, upon termination of the NEOs’ employment, the vested account balance of the deferred compensation will be paid as a termination benefit. Upon a defined change of control, the NEO may elect to receive a change of control benefit equal to the NEOs’ vested account balance or to have the account balance remain subject to the terms and conditions of the plan. The payment of this benefit will not result in additional compensation expense to the company.

Under the deferred compensation plan, a change of control is generally defined as: (1) Any consolidation, merger or share exchange of the company in which the company is not the continuing or surviving corporation; (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the company; (3) the stockholders of the company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the company; (4) the cessation of control (by virtue of their not constituting a majority of directors) of the Board by the individuals who (A) at the date of the plan were directors or (B) become directors after the date of the plan and whose election or nomination for election by the company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who were directors at the date of the plan or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved; (5) or the acquisition of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of an aggregate of 20% of the voting power of the company’s outstanding voting securities.

Under the 2003 restricted stock plan, termination of an employee’s service under the plan (including, but not limited to, voluntary resignation or termination with or without cause) before the restricted shares become vested will result in those non-vested shares being forfeited. However, in the event of a change of control, as defined by the plan, or the death of an NEO, all outstanding awards will automatically vest.

Under the 2003 restricted stock plan, a change of control is generally defined as: (1) any consolidation, merger or share exchange of the company in which the company is not the continuing or surviving corporation; (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the company; (3) the stockholders of the company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the company; (4) the cessation of control (by virtue of their not constituting a majority of directors) of the Board by the individuals who (A) were directors on November 12, 2003 or (B) become directors after such date and whose election or nomination for election by the company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who were directors at such date or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved; (5) the acquisition of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of an aggregate of 20% of the voting power of the company’s outstanding voting securities; or (6) in a Title 11 bankruptcy proceeding, the appointment of a trustee or the conversion of a case involving the company to a case under Chapter 7.

The table below represents the number of shares and the market value of those shares that would have vested had a change in control occurred as of June 27, 2008 using the closing market price of our common stock as of June 27, 2008 of $16.99:

 

Name

   Number of
Shares of
Stock that
Vest upon
Change in
Control
   Market Value of
Shares of Stock
that Vest upon
Change
in Control

Donald W. Hultgren

   56,608    $ 961,770

Kenneth R. Hanks

   9,287    $ 157,786

Timothy J. Hamick

   21,659    $ 367,986

Daniel R. Leland

   3,234    $ 54,946

Richard H. Litton

   5,804    $ 98,610
This excerpt taken from the SWS DEF 14A filed Oct 17, 2007.

Change of Control, Severance Agreements

We do not currently have any separate change of control or severance agreements with any NEO. However, under certain of our compensation plans, there are provisions for change of control or terminations of the NEO.

Under the deferred compensation plan, upon termination of the NEOs’ employment, the vested account balance of the deferred compensation will be paid as a termination benefit. Upon a defined change of control, the NEO may elect to receive a change of control benefit equal to the NEOs’ vested account balance or to have the account balance remain subject to the terms and conditions of the plan. The payment of this benefit will not result in additional compensation expense to the company.

Under the deferred compensation plan, a change of control is generally defined as: (1) Any consolidation, merger or share exchange of the company in which the company is not the continuing or surviving corporation; (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the company; (3) the stockholders of the company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the company; (4) the cessation of control (by virtue of their not constituting a majority of directors) of the Board by the individuals (the “Continuing Directors”) who (A) at the date of this Plan were directors or (B) become directors after the date of this Plan and whose election or nomination for election by the company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who were directors at the date of this Plan or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved; (5) or the acquisition of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the 1934 Act) of an aggregate of 20% of the voting power of the company’s outstanding voting securities.

Under the 2003 restricted stock plan, termination of an employee’s service under the plan (including, but not limited to, voluntary resignation or termination with or without cause) before the restricted shares become vested will result in those non-vested shares being forfeited. However, in the event of a change of control, as defined by the plan, or the death of an NEO, all outstanding awards will automatically vest.

Under the 2003 restricted stock plan, a change of control is generally defined as: (1) any consolidation, merger or share exchange of the company in which the company is not the continuing or surviving corporation; (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the company; (3) the stockholders of the company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the company; (4) the cessation of control (by virtue of their not constituting a majority of directors) of the Board by the individuals who (A) were directors on November 12, 2003 or (B) become directors after such date and whose election or nomination for election by the company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who were directors at such date or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved; (5) the acquisition of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the 1934 Act) of an aggregate of 20% of the voting power of the company’s outstanding voting securities; or (6) in a Title 11 bankruptcy proceeding, the appointment of a trustee or the conversion of a case involving the company to a case under Chapter 7.

 

19


Table of Contents

The table below represents the number of shares and the market value of those shares that would have vested had a change in control occurred as of June 29, 2007:

 

Name

  

Number of

Shares of

Stock that

Vest upon
Change in
Control

  

Market Value of
Shares of Stock
that Vest upon

Change

in Control

Donald W. Hultgren

   70,311    $ 1,520,124

Kenneth R. Hanks

   8,248    $ 178,322

William D. Felder

   8,248    $ 178,322

Richard H. Litton

   5,122    $ 110,738

James H. Ross

   4,930    $ 106,587
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki