Safeway (SWY)

Majority Vote Standard and Director Resignation Policy

In 2006, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our By-Laws that changed the vote standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections from a plurality standard to a “majority of the votes cast” standard. This means each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a candidate for director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. In a contested election (i.e., where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the plurality vote standard remains in place.

In addition, the amendment to our By-Laws incorporated the substance of the director resignation policy the Board had adopted in 2005 as part of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. As so incorporated, the By-Laws provide that following any uncontested election, any incumbent director who did not receive a majority of the

10

Table of Contents

votes cast must tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration by the Board. (Under Delaware corporation law, any such incumbent director would ordinarily continue as a “holdover” director until his or her successor was elected and qualified.) Within 60 days after certification of the stockholder vote, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to the offer of resignation. The Board must act on the Committee’s recommendation within 90 days after certification of the stockholder vote. The Board must, within five business days after reaching its decision, publicly disclose the decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for not accepting a resignation offer, by filing with the SEC a Current Report on Form 8-K. If the Board were to accept all tendered resignations, resulting in the Company having fewer than three directors who were in office before the election, the Board may extend the 90-day period for an additional 90 days, provided it concludes an extension would be in our best interests.

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to these By-Law provisions cannot participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s determination of whether to accept the resignation offer. If each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives a majority of “against” votes at the same stockholder meeting, the Board must appoint a committee of independent directors who did not receive a majority of “against” votes to consider the resignation offers and make the recommendations to the Board. If no independent directors receive a majority of the votes cast, the Board will act on the resignation offers, provided no director who has received a majority of “against” votes can participate in or vote on the decision whether to accept or reject such director’s resignation offer.

Majority Vote Standard and Director Resignation Policy

In March 2006, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our By-Laws that changed the vote standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections from a plurality standard to a “majority of the votes cast” standard. This means each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a candidate for director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. In a contested election (i.e., where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the plurality vote standard remains in place.

10

Table of Contents

In addition, the amendment to our By-Laws incorporated the substance of the director resignation policy the Board had adopted in 2005 as part of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. As so incorporated, the By-Laws provide that following any uncontested election, any incumbent director who did not receive a majority of the votes cast must tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration by the Board. (Under Delaware corporation law, any such incumbent director would ordinarily continue as a “holdover” director until his or her successor was elected and qualified.) Within 60 days after certification of the stockholder vote, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to the offer of resignation. The Board must act on the Committee’s recommendation within 90 days after certification of the stockholder vote. The Board must, within five business days after reaching its decision, publicly disclose the decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for not accepting a resignation offer, by filing with the SEC a Current Report on Form 8-K. If the Board were to accept all tendered resignations, resulting in the Company having fewer than three directors who were in office before the election, the Board may extend the 90-day period for an additional 90 days, provided it concludes an extension would be in our best interests.

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to these By-Law provisions cannot participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s determination of whether to accept the resignation offer. If each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives a majority of “against” votes at the same stockholder meeting, the Board must appoint a committee of independent directors who did not receive a majority of “against” votes to consider the resignation offers and make the recommendations to the Board. If no independent directors receive a majority of the votes cast, the Board will act on the resignation offers, provided no director who has received a majority of “against” votes can participate in or vote on the decision whether to accept or reject such director’s resignation offer.

Majority Vote Standard and Director Resignation Policy

On March 9, 2006, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s Bylaws, which changed the vote standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections from a plurality standard to a “majority of the votes cast” standard. This means each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a candidate for director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. In a contested election (i.e., where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the plurality vote standard remains in place.

In addition, the amendment incorporated into the Bylaws the substance of the director resignation policy the Board had adopted in 2005 as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. As so incorporated, the Bylaws provide that following any uncontested election, any incumbent director who did not receive a majority of the votes cast must tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration by the Board. (Under Delaware corporation law, any such incumbent director would ordinarily continue as a “holdover” director until his or her successor was elected and qualified.) Within 60 days after certification of the stockholder vote, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to the offer of resignation. The Board must act on the Committee’s recommendation within 90 days after certification of the stockholder vote. The Board must, within five business days after reaching its decision, publicly disclose the decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for not accepting a resignation offer, by filing with the SEC a Current Report on Form 8-K. If the Board were to accept all tendered resignations, resulting in the Company having fewer than three directors who were in office before the election, the Board may extend the 90-day period for an additional 90 days provided it concludes an extension would be in the Company’s best interests.

10

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to the aforementioned Bylaw provisions cannot participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s determination of whether to accept the resignation offer. If each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives a majority of “against” votes at the same stockholder meeting, the Board must appoint a committee of independent directors who did not receive a majority of “against” votes to consider the resignation offers and make the recommendations to the Board. If no independent directors receive a majority of the votes cast, the Board will act on the resignation offers, provided no director who has received a majority of “against” votes can participate in or vote on the decision whether to accept or reject such director’s resignation offer.

Majority Vote Standard and Director Resignation Policy

On March 9, 2006, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s Bylaws, which changed the vote standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections from a plurality standard to a “majority of the votes cast” standard. This means that each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. (A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a candidate for director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director.) In a contested election (i.e., where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the plurality vote standard remains in place.

In addition, the amendment incorporated into the Bylaws the substance of the Company’s director resignation policy that the Board had adopted in 2005 as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. As so incorporated, the Bylaws provide that following any uncontested election, any incumbent director who did not receive a majority of the votes cast must tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration by the Board. (Under Delaware corporation law, any such incumbent director would ordinarily continue as a “holdover” director until his or her successor was elected and qualified.) Within 60 days after certification of the stockholder vote, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to the offer of resignation. The Board must act on the Committee’s recommendation within 90 days after certification of the stockholder vote. The Board must, within five business days after reaching its decision, publicly disclose the decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for not accepting a resignation offer, by filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current Report on Form 8-K. If the Board were to accept all tendered resignations, resulting in the Company having fewer than three directors who were in office before the election, the Board may extend the 90-day period for an additional 90 days provided it concludes that an extension would be in the Company’s best interests.

9

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to the aforementioned Bylaw provisions cannot participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s determination of whether to accept the resignation offer. If each member of the Committee receives a majority of “against” votes at the same stockholder meeting, the Board must appoint a committee of independent directors who did not receive a majority of “against” votes to consider the resignation offers and make the recommendations to the Board. If no independent directors receive a majority of the votes cast, the Board will act on the resignation offers; provided that no director who has received a majority of “against” votes can participate in or vote on the decision whether to accept or reject such director’s resignation offer.