Sanofi-Aventis SA 20-F 2012
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
Date of event requiring this shell company report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-31368
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Translation of registrants name into English)
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
54, Rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France
(Address of principal executive offices)
Karen Linehan, Senior Vice President Legal Affairs and General Counsel
54, Rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France. Fax: 011 + 33 1 53 77 43 03. Tel: 011 + 33 1 53 77 40 00
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or
common stock as of December 31, 2011 was:
Ordinary shares: 1,340,918,811
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405
of the Securities Act.
YES x NO ¨.
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
YES ¨ NO x.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ¨ International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board x Other ¨
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ¨ NO x.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
The consolidated financial statements contained in this annual report on Form 20-F have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and with IFRS as adopted by the European Union, as of December 31, 2011.
Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms Sanofi, the Company, the Group, we, our or us refer to Sanofi and its consolidated subsidiaries.
All references herein to United States or U.S. are to the United States of America, references to dollars or $ are to the currency of the United States, references to France are to the Republic of France, and references to euro and are to the currency of the European Union member states (including France) participating in the European Monetary Union.
Brand names appearing in this annual report are trademarks of Sanofi and/or its affiliates, with the exception of:
Not all trademarks related to investigational agents have been authorized as of the date of this annual report by the relevant health authorities; for instance Lyxumia® and Aubagio trade names have not been approved by the FDA.
The data relative to market shares and ranking information for pharmaceutical products presented in particular in Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Markets Marketing and distribution are based on sales data from IMS Health MIDAS (IMS), retail and hospital, for calendar year 2011, in constant euros (unless otherwise indicated).
While we believe that the IMS sales data we present below are generally useful comparative indicators for our industry, they may not precisely match the sales figures published by the companies that sell the products (including our company and other pharmaceutical companies). In particular, the rules used by IMS to attribute the sales of a product covered by an alliance or license agreement do not always exactly match the rules of the agreement.
In order to allow a reconciliation with our basis of consolidation as defined in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Presentation of Net Sales, IMS data shown in the present document have been adjusted and include:
Data relative to market shares and ranking information presented herein for our vaccines business are based on internal estimates unless stated otherwise.
Product indications described in this annual report are composite summaries of the major indications approved in the products principal markets. Not all indications are necessarily available in each of the markets in which the products are approved. The summaries presented herein for the purpose of financial reporting do not substitute for careful consideration of the full labeling approved in each market.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report contains forward-looking statements. We may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in our periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 6-K, in our annual report to shareholders, in our offering circulars and prospectuses, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees to third parties. Examples of such forward-looking statements include:
This information is based on data, assumptions and estimates considered as reasonable by the Company as at the date of this annual report and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.
Words such as believe, anticipate, plan, expect, intend, target, estimate, project, predict, forecast, guideline, should and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent, known and unknown, risks and uncertainties associated with the regulatory, economic, financial and competitive environment, and other factors that could cause future results and objectives to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. The list below indicates some of the risk factors faced by the Company:
We caution you that the foregoing list of risk factors is not exclusive and a number of important factors, discussed under Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors below, could affect the future results and cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks, not currently known or considered immaterial by the Group, may have the same unfavorable effect and investors may lose all or part of their investment.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Other than required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update them in light of new information or future developments.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 3. Key Information
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The tables below set forth selected consolidated financial data for Sanofi. These financial data are derived from the Sanofi consolidated financial statements. The Sanofi consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are included in Item 18 of this annual report.
The consolidated financial statements of Sanofi for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 have been prepared in compliance with IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and with IFRS adopted by the European Union as of December 31, 2011. The term IFRS refers collectively to international accounting and financial reporting standards (IAS and IFRS) and to interpretations of the interpretations committees (SIC and IFRIC) mandatorily applicable as of December 31, 2011.
Sanofi reports its financial results in euros.
SELECTED CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SELECTED EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
The following table sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rates for the euro from 2007 through March 2012 expressed in U.S. dollars per euro. The information concerning the U.S. dollar exchange rate is based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the Noon Buying Rate). We provide the exchange rates below solely for your convenience. We do not represent that euros were, could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any other rate. For information regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on our results of operations, see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
On March 5, 2012 the European Central Bank Rate was 1.3220 per euro.
D. Risk Factors
Important factors that could cause actual financial, business, research or operating results to differ materially from expectations are disclosed in this annual report, including without limitation the following risk factors and the factors described under Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. In addition to the risks listed below, we may be subject to other material risks that as of the date of this report are not currently known to us or that we deem immaterial at this time.
Risks Relating to Legal Matters
We rely on our patents and proprietary rights to provide exclusive rights to market certain of our products, and if such patents and other rights were limited or circumvented, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
Through patent and other proprietary rights such as supplementary protection certificate in Europe for instance, we hold exclusivity rights for a number of our research-based products. However, the protection that we are able to obtain varies from product to product and country to country and may not be sufficient to maintain effective product exclusivity because of local variations in the patents, differences in national law or legal systems, development in law or jurisprudence, or inconsistent judgments. We are involved in litigation worldwide to enforce certain of these patent rights against generics and proposed generics (see Item 8. Financial Information A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings for additional information). Moreover, patent rights are limited in time and do not always provide effective protection for our products: competitors may successfully avoid patents through design innovation, we may not hold sufficient evidence of infringement to bring suit, or our infringement claim may not result in a decision that our rights are valid, enforceable or infringed. Moreover, a number of countries are increasingly easing the introduction of generic drugs or biosimilar products through accelerated approval procedures.
Even in cases where we ultimately prevail in our infringement claim, legal remedies available for harm caused to us by infringing products may be inadequate to make us whole. A competitor may launch a generic product at risk before the initiation or completion of the court proceedings, and the court may decline to grant us a preliminary injunction to halt further at risk sales and remove the infringing product from the market. Additionally, while we would be entitled to obtain damages in such a case, the amount that we may ultimately be awarded and able to collect may be insufficient to compensate all harm caused to us.
Further, our successful assertion of a given patent against one competing product is not necessarily predictive of our future success or failure in asserting the same patent against a second competing product because of such factors as possible differences in the formulations. Also a successful result in one country may not predict success in another country because of local variations in the patents.
To the extent valid third-party patent rights cover our products, we or our partners may be required to obtain licenses from the holders of these patents in order to manufacture, use or sell these products, and payments under these licenses may reduce our profits from these products. We may not be able to obtain these licenses on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain a required license or are unable to alter the design of our technology to fall outside the scope of a third-party patent, we may be unable to market some of our products, which may limit our profitability.
Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Product liability is a significant business risk for any pharmaceutical company, and the Groups ongoing diversification could increase our product liability exposure (see notably The diversification of the Groups business exposes us to additional risks below). Substantial damage awards and/or settlements have been made notably in the United States and other common law jurisdictions against pharmaceutical companies based on claims for injuries allegedly caused by the use of their products. Such claims can also be accompanied by consumer fraud claims by customers or third-party payers seeking reimbursement of the cost of the product. Often the side effect profile of pharmaceutical drugs cannot be fully established based on preapproval clinical studies involving only several hundred to several thousand patients. Routine review and analysis of the continually growing body of post-marketing safety surveillance and clinical trials provide additional information for example, potential evidence of rare, population-specific or long-term adverse reactions or of drug
interactions that were not observed in preapproval clinical studies and may cause product labeling to evolve, including restrictions of therapeutic indications, new contraindications, warnings or precautions, and occasionally even the suspension or withdrawal of a product marketing authorization. Several pharmaceutical companies have withdrawn products from the market because of newly detected or suspected adverse reactions to their products, and as a result of such withdrawal now face significant product liability claims. We are currently defending a number of product liability claims (see Note D.22.a) to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report) and there can be no assurance that the Group will be successful in defending against each of these claims or will not face additional claims in the future. Also our risk exposure also increased due to the fact that we are now commercializing some devices using new technologies which, in case of malfunction, could cause unexpected damages and trigger our liability (see We are increasingly dependent on information technologies and networks. below).
Although we continue to insure a portion of our product liability with third-party carriers, product liability coverage is increasingly difficult and costly to obtain, particularly in the United States, and in the future it is possible that self-insurance may become the sole commercially reasonable means available for managing the product liability financial risk of our pharmaceutical and vaccines businesses (see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Insurance and Risk Coverage). Due to insurance conditions, even when the Group has insurance coverage, recoveries from insurers may not be totally successful. Moreover the insolvency of a carrier could negatively affect our ability to achieve the practical recovery of the coverage for which we have already paid a premium.
Product liability claims, regardless of their merits or the ultimate success of the Groups defense, are costly, divert management attention, may harm our reputation and can impact the demand for our products. Substantial product liability claims, if successful, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Claims and investigations relating to competition law, marketing practices and pricing could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The marketing of our products is heavily regulated, and alleged failures to comply fully with applicable regulations could subject us to substantial fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative remedies, potentially leading to the imposition of additional regulatory controls or exclusion from government reimbursement programs. Sanofi and certain of its subsidiaries are under investigation by various government entities and are defending a number of lawsuits relating to antitrust and/or pricing and marketing practices, including, for example in the United States, class action lawsuits and whistle blower litigation. See Note D.22.c) to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.
Because many of these cases allege substantial unquantified damages, may be subject to treble damages and frequently seek significant punitive damages and penalties, it is possible that any final determination of liability or settlement of these claims or investigations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
There are other legal matters in which adverse outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Group faces significant litigation and government investigations or audits, including allegations of securities law violations, claims related to employment matters, patent and intellectual property disputes, consumer law claims and tax audits.
Unfavorable outcomes in these matters, or in similar matters to be faced in the future, could preclude the commercialization of products, negatively affect the profitability of existing products and subject us to substantial fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative remedies, potentially leading to the imposition of additional regulatory controls or exclusion from government reimbursement programs. Any such result could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, or business. See Item 8. Financial Information A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings and Note D.22. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.
Changes in the laws or regulations that apply to us could affect the Groups business, results of operations and financial condition.
Governmental authorities are increasingly looking to facilitate generic and biosimilar competition to existing products through new regulatory proposals intended to, or resulting in, changes to the scope of patent or data exclusivity rights and use of accelerated regulatory pathways for generic and biosimilar drug approvals. Such regulatory proposals, if enacted, could make prosecution of patents for new products more difficult and time consuming or could adversely affect the exclusivity period for our products, thereby materially and adversely affecting our financial results.
This new competitive environment and potential regulatory changes may further limit the exclusivity enjoyed by innovative products on the market and directly impact pricing and reimbursement levels, which may adversely affect our business and future results. See Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Competition and Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Regulation.
In addition, changes in tax laws or in their application with respect to matters such as tax rates, transfer pricing, dividends, controlled companies or a restriction in certain forms of tax relief, could affect our effective tax rate and our future results.
For information regarding risks related to changes in environmental rules and regulations, see Environmental liabilities and compliance costs may have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations below.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Generic versions of some of our products may be approved for sale in one or more of their major markets.
Many of our products are subject to aggressive generic competition, and additional products of the Group could become subject to generic competition in the future as product patents and/or exclusivities for several of our products have recently expired, or are about to expire. For example pediatric exclusivity for Aprovel® and Plavix® which contribute significantly to our net income will expire in the United States in March 2012 and May 2012, respectively, and the compound patent of Aprovel® will expire in most of the European Union in August 2012. Also, the U.S. market exclusivity of Eloxatin® will expire in August 2012, pursuant to settlement agreements. We expect this generic competition to continue and to implicate drug products with even relatively modest revenues.
The introduction of a generic version of a branded medicine typically results in a significant and rapid reduction in net sales for the branded product because generic manufacturers typically offer their unbranded versions at sharply lower prices. Accordingly, approval and market entry of a generic product often reduces the price that we receive for these products and/or the volume of the product that we would be able to sell and could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The extent of sales erosion also depends on the number of generic versions of our products that are actually marketed. For instance in 2011, there was only one generic product of enoxaparin sodium (Lovenox®) marketed in the United States. The introduction of a second generic on the U.S. market in early 2012 is likely to decrease our sales and revenues on this product.
Our long-term objectives may not be fully realized.
We have established a strategy focused on three pillars: increased innovation in R&D, adaptation of our structure for future opportunities and challenges and pursuit of external growth opportunities. We may not be able to fully realize our strategic objectives and, even if we are able to do so, these strategic objectives may not deliver the expected benefits.
For example, our strategy involves concentrating efforts around identified growth platforms and meeting significant growth objectives over 2012-2015. There is no guarantee that we will meet these objectives or that these platforms will grow in line with anticipated growth rates. A failure to continue to expand our business in targeted growth platforms could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
As a further example, we are implementing a cost savings program across the Group and expect this new initiative, together with expected synergies from our recent acquisition of Genzyme, to generate additional incremental cost savings by 2015. We may fail to realize all the expected cost savings, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
We may fail to adequately renew our product portfolio whether through our own research and development or through acquisitions and strategic alliances.
To be successful in the highly competitive pharmaceutical industry, we must commit substantial resources each year to research and development in order to develop new products to take the place of products facing expiration of patent and regulatory data exclusivity or competition from new products that are perceived as being superior. In 2011, we spent 4,811 million on research and development, amounting to approximately 14.4% of our net sales.
Developing a product is a costly, lengthy and uncertain process. Also we may not be investing in the right technology platforms, leading therapeutic area, and products classes in order to build a robust pipeline and fulfill unmet medical needs. Fields of discovery and especially biotechnology are highly competitive and characterized by significant and rapid technological changes. Numerous companies are working on the same targets and a product considered as promising at the very beginning may become less attractive if a competitor showing the same mechanism of action reaches earlier the market.
The research and development process typically takes from 10 to 15 years from discovery to commercial product launch. This process is conducted in various stages in order to test, along with other features, the effectiveness and safety of a product. There can be no assurance that any of these compounds will be proven safe or effective. See Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Pharmaceutical Research & Development and Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Vaccines Research and Development. Accordingly, there is a substantial risk at each stage of development that we will not achieve our goals of safety and/or effectiveness including during the course of a development trial and that we will have to abandon a product in which we have invested substantial amounts and human resources, including in late stage development (Phase III). Decisions concerning the studies to be carried out can have a significant impact on the marketing strategy for a given product. Multiple in-depth studies can demonstrate that a product has additional benefits, facilitating the products marketing, but such studies are expensive and time consuming and may delay the products submission to health authorities for approval.
Our ongoing investments in new product launches and research and development for future products could therefore result in increased costs without a proportionate increase in revenues which may negatively affect our operating results. Each regulatory authority may also impose its own requirements in order to grant a license to market the product, including requiring local clinical studies, and may delay or refuse to grant approval, even though a product has already been approved in another country. Finally, obtaining regulatory marketing approval is not a guarantee that the product will achieve commercial success. Following each product marketing approval, the medical need served by the product and the corresponding reimbursement rate are evaluated by other governmental agencies which may in some cases require additional studies, including comparative studies, which may both effectively delay marketing of the new product and add to its development costs.
Also our success depends on our ability to educate patients and healthcare providers and provide them with innovative data about our products and their uses. If these education efforts are not effective, then we may not be able to increase the sales of our new products to the market.
On the same topic, for the research and development of drugs in rare diseases, we produce relatively small amounts of material at early stages. Even if a product candidate receives all necessary approvals for commercialization, we may not be able to successfully scale-up production of the product material at a reasonable cost or at all and we may not receive additional approvals in sufficient time to meet product demand.
As a complement to our portfolio of products, we pursue a strategy of selective acquisitions, in-licensing and partnerships in order to develop new growth opportunities. The implementation of this strategy depends on our ability to identify business development opportunities at a reasonable cost and under acceptable conditions of
financing. Moreover, entering into these in-licensing or partnership agreements generally requires the payment of significant milestones well before the relevant products are placed on the market without any assurance that such investments will ultimately become profitable in the long term.
Because of the active competition among pharmaceutical groups for such business development opportunities, there can be no assurance of our success in completing these transactions when such opportunities are identified.
A substantial share of the revenue and income of the Group continues to depend on the performance of certain flagship products.
We generate a substantial share of our revenues from the sale of certain key products (see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Results of Operations Year ended December 31, 2011 compared with year ended December 31, 2010 Net Sales by Product Pharmaceuticals), which represented 37.6% of the Groups consolidated revenues in 2011. Among these products is Lantus®, which was the Groups leading product with revenues of 3,916 million in 2011, representing 11.7% of the Groups consolidated revenues for the year. Lantus® is a flagship product of the Diabetes division, one of the Groups growth platforms.
Sales of Cerezyme®, our enzyme-replacement product for patients with Gaucher disease which is also amongst our flagship products, totaled 441 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, below the usual level of sales due to important production disruptions since 2009 (see The manufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition and delay the launch of new products. below). In addition the patient population with Gaucher disease is limited. Furthermore, changes in the methods for treating patients with such disease could limit growth, or result in a decline, in Cerezyme® sales.
In general, a reduction in sales of one or more of our flagship products or in their growth could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may lose market share to competing remedies or generic brands if they are perceived to be equivalent or superior products.
We are faced with intense competition from generic products and brand-name drugs. Doctors or patients may choose these products over ours if they perceive them to be safer, more reliable, more effective, easier to administer or less expensive, which could cause our revenues to decline and affect our results of operations.
For example, Cerezyme® and Fabrazyme® shortages due to manufacturing issues at our facility in Allston, Massachusetts (United-States) (see The manufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition and delay the launch of new products. below) created, and continue to create, opportunities for our competitors and have resulted in a decrease in the number of patients using these products and a loss of our overall market share of Gaucher and Fabry patients, respectively. Even if we are able again to provide a full, sustainable product supply, there is no guarantee these patients will return to using our products.
Additionally, the market for our products could also be affected if a competitors innovative drug in the same market were to become available as generic because a certain number of patients can be expected to switch to a lower-cost alternative therapy.
The diversification of the Groups business exposes us to additional risks.
We are implementing a strategy that includes pursuing external growth opportunities to meet the challenges that we have identified for the future. The inability to quickly or efficiently integrate newly acquired activities or businesses, such as Genzyme, the loss of key employees or integration costs that are higher than anticipated, could delay our growth objectives and prevent us from achieving expected synergies. For instance, challenges that we may face in our efforts to integrate Genzyme include, among others:
If we fail to effectively integrate Genzyme or the integration takes longer than expected, we may not achieve the expected benefits of the transaction.
Moreover, we may miscalculate the risks associated with newly acquired activities or businesses at the time they are acquired or not have the means to evaluate them properly. It may take a considerable amount of time and be difficult to implement a risk analysis after the acquisition is completed due to lack of historical data. As a result, risk management and the coverage of such risks, particularly through insurance policies, may prove to be insufficient or ill-adapted.
While pursuing our objective to become a global and diversified leader within the health industry, we are exposed to a number of new risks inherent in sectors in which, in the past, we have been either less active or not present at all. As an example:
Moreover, losses that may be sustained or caused by these new businesses may differ, with regards to their nature, scope and level, from the types of product liability claims that we have handled in the past (see Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition above), and thus our current risk management and insurance coverage may not be adapted to such losses. These risks could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
The globalization of the Groups business exposes us to increased risks.
Emerging markets have been identified as one of our growth platforms and are among the pillars of our overall strategy. Any difficulties in adapting to emerging markets and/or a significant decline in the anticipated growth rate in these regions could impair our ability to take advantage of these growth opportunities and could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
There is no guarantee that our efforts to expand sales in emerging markets will succeed. The significant expansion of our activities in emerging markets may further expose us to more volatile economic conditions, political instability, competition from companies that are already well established in these markets, the inability to adequately respond to the unique characteristics of these markets, particularly with respect to their regulatory frameworks, difficulties in recruiting qualified personnel, potential exchange controls, weaker intellectual
property protection, higher crime levels (particularly with respect to counterfeit products (see Counterfeit versions of our products harm our business, below)), corruption and fraud, as we operate in many parts of the world where corruption exists to some degree.
Our existing policies and procedures, which are designed to help ensure that we, our employees and our agents comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ( FCPA), the UK Bribery Act, and other anti-bribery laws, may not adequately protect us against liability under these laws for actions taken by our employees, agents and intermediaries with respect to our business. Failure to comply with domestic or international laws could result in various adverse consequences, including possible delay in the approval or refusal to approve a product, recalls, seizures, withdrawal of an approved product from the market, or the imposition of criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial monetary penalties.
Our products and manufacturing facilities are subject to significant government regulations and approvals, which are often costly and could result in adverse consequences to our business if we fail to comply with the regulations or maintain the approvals.
The industry in which we operate faces a changing regulatory environment and heightened public scrutiny worldwide, which simultaneously require greater assurances than ever as to the safety and efficacy of medications and health products on the one hand, and effectively provide reduced incentives for innovative pharmaceutical research on the other hand.
Health authorities, are increasingly focusing on product safety and on the risk/benefit profile of pharmaceuticals products. In particular, the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have imposed increasingly burdensome requirements on pharmaceutical companies, particularly in terms of the volume of data needed to demonstrate a products efficacy and safety. For the same reasons, the marketed products are subject to continual review, risk evaluations or comparative effectiveness studies even after regulatory approval. These requirements have resulted in increasing the costs associated with maintaining regulatory approvals and achieving reimbursement for our products.
Later discovery of previously undetected problems may result in marketing restrictions or the suspension or withdrawal of the product, as well as an increased risk of litigation for both pharmaceutical and animal health products. These post-regulatory approval reviews and data analyses can lead to the issuance of recommendations by government agencies, health professional and patient organizations or other specialized organizations regarding the use of products, which may result in a reduction in sales volume, such as, for example, a recommendation to limit the patient scope of a drugs indication. For instance in September 2011, the EMA defined a more restrictive indication for Multaq®, one of our cardiovascular products. Such reviews may result in the discovery of significant problems with respect to a competing product that is similar to one sold by the Group, which may in turn cast suspicion on the entire class to which these products belong and ultimately diminish the sales of the relevant product of the Group. When such issues arise, the contemplative nature of evidence-based health care and restrictions on what pharmaceutical manufacturers may say about their products are not always well suited to rapidly defending the Group or the publics legitimate interests in the face of the political and market pressures generated by social media and rapid news cycles, and this may result in unnecessary commercial harm, overly restrictive regulatory actions and erratic share price performance.
In addition, to the extent that new regulations raise the costs of obtaining and maintaining product authorization, or limit the economic value of a new product to its inventor, the growth prospects of our industry and of the Group are diminished. Also about 50% of our current research and development portfolio is constituted by biological products, that may bring in the future new therapeutic responses to current unmet medical needs but which may also lead to more technical constraints and costly investments from an industrial standpoint.
Moreover, we and certain of our third-party suppliers are also required to comply with applicable regulations, known as good manufacturing practices, which govern the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. To monitor our compliance with those applicable regulations, the FDA, the EMA and comparable agencies in other jurisdictions routinely conduct inspections of our facilities and may identify potential deficiencies which might be expensive and time consuming to address. If we fail to adequately respond to a warning letter
identifying a deficiency, or otherwise fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we could be subject to enforcement, remedial and/or punitive actions by the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities.
For example, in May 2010, Genzyme entered into a consent decree with the FDA relating to its Allston facility (see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Production and Raw Materials.). Pursuant to the consent decree, in November 2010, Genzyme paid $175.0 million to the U.S. Federal Governement disgorgement of past profits. The consent decree also requires Genzyme to implement a plan to bring the Allston facility into compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Genzyme submitted a comprehensive remediation plan to FDA in April 2011. Remediation of the Allston facility in accordance with that plan is underway and is currently expected to continue for four more years, however, there is no guarantee that this timeframe will be respected.
We incurred substantial debt in connection with the acquisition of Genzyme which may limit our business flexibility compared to some of our peers
Our consolidated debt increased substantially in connection with our acquisition of Genzyme because we incurred debt to finance the acquisition price, and because our consolidated debt includes the debt incurred by Genzyme prior to the acquisition. Although we already achieved a partial deleverage by the end of 2011 (as of December 31, 2011, our debt, net of cash and cash equivalents amounted to 10.9 billion), we make significant debt service payments to our lenders and this could limit our ability to engage in new transactions which could have been part of our strategy.
We face uncertainties over the pricing and reimbursement of pharmaceutical products.
The commercial success of our existing products and our products candidates depends in part on the conditions under which our products are reimbursed. Pressure on pricing and reimbursement is strong due to:
In addition to the pricing pressures they exert, governmental and private third-party payers and purchasers of pharmaceutical products may reduce volumes of sales by restricting access to formularies or otherwise discouraging physician prescriptions of our products. In the United States, health care reform law is increasing the governments role with respect to price, reimbursement and the coverage levels for healthcare-related expenses for the large government health care sector, imposed cost containment measures and imposed drug companies rebates to the government. Implementation of health care reform has affected and could still affect our revenues and/or margins (for further details concerning this law and a description of certain regulatory pricing systems that affect our Group see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Pricing & Reimbursement). Some states are also considering legislation that would control the prices of and access to drugs and we believe that federal and state legislatures and health agencies will continue to focus on healthcare reform implementation in the future.
We encounter similar cost containment issues in countries outside the United States. In certain countries, including countries in the EU and Canada, the coverage of prescription drugs, pricing and levels of reimbursement are subject to governmental control. For example, in Spain, recent direct price-related measures include price discount to all products launched more than 10 years ago, all genericized products needing to be at a minor (lower) price, and no more gradualism in price reductions of originator post generics introduction. Additionally, measures such as INN prescriptions, have been implemented. Another example, in Turkey Government has accelerated enforcement of drugs costs containment measures which include increased institutional discount applied on reimbursement prices and lower reference prices for reimbursement of Generics and originals with Generics as well as 20-year old drugs without Generics.
Due to the ongoing cost containment policies being pursued in many jurisdiction in which we operate, we are unable to predict the availability or amount of reimbursement for our product candidates.
In addition, our operating results may also be affected by parallel imports, particularly within the European Union, whereby distributors engage in arbitrage based on national price differences to buy product on low cost markets for resale on higher cost markets.
The ongoing slowdown of global economic growth and the financial crisis could have negative consequences for our business1.
Over the past several years, growth of the global pharmaceutical market has become increasingly tied to global economic growth. In this context, a substantial and lasting slowdown of the global economy or major national economies could negatively affect growth in the global pharmaceutical market and, as a result, adversely affect our business. This effect may be expected to be particularly strong in markets having significant co-pays or lacking a developed third-party payer system, as individual patients may delay or decrease out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures. Such a slowdown could also reduce the sources of funding for national social security systems, leading to heightened pressure on drug prices, increased substitution of generic drugs, and the exclusion of certain products from formularies.
Additionally, to the extent the slowing economic environment, as well as ongoing sovereign debt crisis affecting several European countries, may lead to financial difficulties or even the default or failure of major players including wholesalers or public sector buyers financed by insolvent States, the Group could experience disruptions in the distribution of its products as well as the adverse effects described below at We are subject to the risk of non-payment by our customers. Moreover, to the extent that the economic and financial crisis is directly affecting business, it may also lead to a disruption or delay in the performance of third parties on which we rely for parts of our business, including collaboration partners and suppliers (for more information see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Liquidity.). Such disruptions or delays could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See We rely on third parties for the manufacture and supply of a substantial portion of our raw materials, active ingredients and medical devices; supply disruptions and/or quality concerns could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, We rely on third parties for the marketing of some of our products and Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition below.
Further, we believe our net sales may be negatively impacted by the continuing challenging global economic environment, as high unemployment levels and increases in co-pays may lead some patients to switch to generic products, delay treatments, skip doses or use less effective treatments to reduce their costs. Moreover, current economic conditions in the United States have resulted in an increase in the number of patients in the Medicaid program, under which sales of pharmaceuticals are subject to substantial rebates and, in many U.S. states, to formulary restrictions limiting access to brand-name drugs, including ours.
Our animal health business may also be negatively affected by the current slowdown in global economic growth (for instance tight credit conditions may limit the borrowing power of livestock producers, causing some to switch to lower-priced products).
The manufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition and delay the launch of new products.
Many of our products are manufactured using technically complex processes requiring specialized facilities, highly specific raw materials and other production constraints. We must also be able to produce sufficient quantities of the products to satisfy demand. Our biologic products (including vaccines) in particular are subject to the risk of manufacturing stoppages or the risk of loss of inventory because of the difficulties inherent to the processing of biological materials and the potential unavailability of adequate amounts of raw materials meeting our standards. Additionally, specific conditions must be respected both by the Group and our customers for the storage and distribution of many of our products, e.g., cold storage for certain vaccines and insulin-based products. The complexity of these processes, as well as strict internal and government standards for the manufacture of our products, subject us to risks. The occurrence or suspected occurrence of out-of-specification
production or storage can lead to lost inventories, and in some cases product recalls, with consequential reputational damage and the risk of product liability (see Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, above). The investigation and remediation of any identified problems can cause production delays, substantial expense, lost sales and the delay of new product launches and can adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Like many of our competitors, we have faced, and to a certain extent continue to face, significant manufacturing issues, most notably in our Genzyme subsidiary for the production of Cerezyme® and Fabrazyme®. In June 2009, Genzyme announced it had detected a virus that impairs cell growth in one of the bioreactors used in the Allston, Massachusetts facility to produce Cerezyme®. This contamination has had a material adverse effect on Cerezyme® and Fabrazyme® revenues. We will continue to work with minimal levels of inventory for Cerezyme® and Fabrazyme® until we are able to build inventory. However, there can be no guarantee that we will be able to return to pre-contamination supply levels of such products, nor can there be any guarantee that we will not face similar issues in the future or that we will successfully manage such issues when they arise.
We rely on third parties for the manufacture and supply of a substantial portion of our raw materials, active ingredients and medical devices; supply disruptions and/or quality concerns could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Third parties supply us with a substantial portion of our raw materials, active ingredients and medical devices, which exposes us to the risk of a supply interruption in the event that these suppliers experience financial difficulties or are unable to manufacture a sufficient supply of our products meeting Group quality standards. It also increases the risk of quality issues, even with the most scrupulously selected suppliers.
If disruptions or quality concerns were to arise in the third-party supply of raw materials, active ingredients or medical devices, this could adversely affect our ability to sell our products in the quantities demanded by the market and could damage our reputation and relationships with our customers. See also The manufacture of our products is technically complex, and supply interruptions, product recalls or inventory losses caused by unforeseen events may reduce sales, adversely affect our operating results and financial condition and delay the launch of new products above. We may not have redundant manufacturing capacity for certain products particularly biologic products. For instance in summer 2011 a technical incident occurred in the filling line used for Apidra 3mL cartridges at our manufacturing site in Frankfurt and this has caused temporary shortages for Apidra 3mL cartridges. Also all of our bulk Cerezyme® products are produced solely at our Allston, Massachusetts facility. Even though we aim to have backup sources of supply whenever possible, including by manufacturing backup supplies of our principal active ingredients at a second or third facility when practicable, we cannot be certain they will be sufficient if our principal sources become unavailable. Switching sources and manufacturing facilities may require significant time.
Further, some raw materials essential to the manufacture of our products are not widely available from sources we consider reliable; for example, we have approved only a limited number of suppliers of heparins for use in the manufacture of Lovenox®. Heparin purchase prices can also fluctuate. See Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Production and Raw Materials for a description of these outsourcing arrangements. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.
We rely on third parties for the marketing of some of our products.
We market some of our products in collaboration with other pharmaceutical companies. For example, we currently have major collaborative arrangements with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) for the marketing of Plavix® and Aprovel® in the United States and several other countries, with Warner Chilcott for the osteoporosis treatment Actonel®, and with Merck & Co., Inc. for the distribution of vaccines in Europe. See Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Pharmaceutical Products Main pharmaceutical products and Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Vaccine Products for more information on our major alliances. When we market our products through collaboration arrangements, we are subject to the risk that certain decisions, such as the establishment of budgets and promotion strategies, are subject to the control of our collaboration partners, and that deadlocks may adversely affect the activities conducted through the collaboration arrangements. For example, our alliances with BMS are subject to the operational management of BMS in some countries, including the United States. Any conflicts that
we may have with our partners during the course of these agreements or at the time of their renewal or renegotiation may affect the marketing of certain of our products and may cause a decline in our revenues and affect our results of operations.
Counterfeit versions of our products harm our business.
The drug supply has been increasingly challenged by the vulnerability of distribution channels to illegal counterfeiting and the presence of counterfeit products in a growing number of markets and over the Internet. Counterfeit products are frequently unsafe or ineffective, and can be potentially life-threatening. To distributors and users, counterfeit products may be visually indistinguishable from the authentic version. Reports of adverse reactions to counterfeit drugs or increased levels of counterfeiting could materially affect patient confidence in the authentic product, and harm the business of companies such as Sanofi. Additionally, it is possible that adverse events caused by unsafe counterfeit products will mistakenly be attributed to the authentic product. If a Group product was the subject of counterfeits, the Group could incur substantial reputational and financial harm. See Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Competition.
We are subject to the risk of non-payment by our customers.1
We run the risk of delayed payments or even non-payment by our customers, which consist principally of wholesalers, distributors, pharmacies, hospitals, clinics and government agencies. This risk is accentuated by the current worldwide financial crisis. The United States poses particular client credit risk issues, because of the concentrated distribution system in which approximately 62% of our consolidated U.S. pharmaceutical sales are accounted for by just three wholesalers. In addition, the Groups three main customers represent 17.4% of our gross total revenues. We are also exposed to large wholesalers in other markets, particularly in Europe. An inability of one or more of these wholesalers to honor their debts to us could adversely affect our financial condition (see Note D.34. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report).
Since the beginning of 2010, financial difficulties in some countries of southern Europe have increased especially in Greece and Portugal. Part of our customers in these countries are public or subsidized health systems. The deteriorating economic and credit conditions in these countries has led to longer payment terms. This trend may continue and we may need to reassess the recoverable amount of our debts in these countries during the coming financial years (for more information see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Liquidity.).
Our pension liabilities are affected by factors such as the performance of plan assets, interest rates, actuarial data and experience and changes in laws and regulations.
Our future funding obligations for our main defined-benefit pension plans depend on changes in the future performance of assets held in trust for these plans, the interest rates used to determine funding levels (or company liabilities), actuarial data and experience, inflation trends, the level of benefits provided for by the plans, as well as changes in laws and regulations. Adverse changes in those factors could increase our unfunded obligations under such plans, which would require more funds to be contributed and hence negatively affect our cash flow and results (see Note D.19.1 to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report).
Impairment charges or write downs in our books and changes in accounting standards could have a significant adverse effect on the Groups results of operations and financial results.
New or revised accounting standards, rules and interpretations issued from time to time by the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) could result in changes to the recognition of income and expense that may materially and adversely affect the Groups financial results.
In addition, substantial value is allocated to intangible assets and goodwill resulting from business combinations, as disclosed at Note D.4. to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report at Item 18, which could be substantially impaired upon indications of impairment (primarily relating to pharmacovigilance, patent litigation and the launch of competing products), with adverse effects on our financial condition and the value of our assets.
Also if any of our strategic equity investments decline in value and remain below cost for an extended duration, we may be required to write down our investment.
In addition the global financial crisis and in particular the ongoing sovereign debt crisis affecting certain European countries could also negatively affect the value of our assets (see Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition below and The ongoing slowdown of global economic growth and the financial crisis could have negative consequences for our business above). For example, given the current level of investor confidence in the ability of the Greek State to avoid default, as a result of mark to market accounting standards, we recognized an impairment of 49 million on certain Greek bonds held by us in 2011.
We are increasingly dependent on information technologies and networks.
Our business depends on the use of information technologies, which means that certain key areas such as research and development, production and sales are to a large extent dependent on our information technology capabilities. We are commercializing some devices using new technologies which, in case of malfunctions could lead to a misuse causing a risk of damages to patients (see Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition above). Our inability or the inability of our third-party service providers (for instance the accounting of some of our subsidiaries has been externalized) to implement adequate security and quality measures for data processing could lead to data deterioration or loss in the event of a system malfunction, or allow data to be stolen or corrupted in the event of a security breach, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Natural disasters prevalent in certain regions in which we do business could affect our operations
Some of our production sites are located in areas exposed to natural disasters, such as earthquakes (in North Africa, Middle East, Asia, Pacific, Europe, Central and Latin Americas), floods (in Africa, Asia Pacific and Europe) and hurricanes. In the event of a major disaster we could experience severe destruction or interruption of our operations and production capacity. As a result, our operations could suffer serious harm which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Environmental Risks of Our Industrial Activities
Risks from the handling of hazardous materials could adversely affect our results of operations.
Manufacturing activities, such as the chemical manufacturing of the active ingredients in our products and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and wastes, expose us to various risks, including:
These operating risks can cause personal injury, property damage and environmental contamination, and may result in:
The occurrence of any of these events may significantly reduce the productivity and profitability of a particular manufacturing facility and adversely affect our operating results.
Although we maintain property, business interruption and casualty insurance that we believe is in accordance with customary industry practices, we cannot assure you that this insurance will be adequate to cover fully all potential hazards incidental to our business.
Environmental liabilities and compliance costs may have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations.
The environmental laws of various jurisdictions impose actual and potential obligations on our Group to remediate contaminated sites. These obligations may relate to sites:
These environmental remediation obligations could significantly reduce our operating results. Sanofi accrues provisions for remediation when our management believes the need is probable and that it is reasonably possible to estimate the cost. See Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) for additional information regarding our environmental policies. In particular, our provisions for these obligations may be insufficient if the assumptions underlying these provisions prove incorrect or if we are held responsible for additional, currently undiscovered contamination. These judgments and estimates may later prove inaccurate, and any shortfalls could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Furthermore, we are or may become involved in claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings relating to environmental matters. Some current and former Sanofis subsidiaries have been named as potentially responsible parties or the equivalent under the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (also known as Superfund), and similar statutes in France, Germany, Italy, Brazil and elsewhere. As a matter of statutory or contractual obligation, we and/or our subsidiaries may retain responsibility for environmental liabilities at some of the sites of our predecessor companies, or our subsidiaries that we demerged, divested or may divest. We have disputes outstanding regarding certain sites no longer owned by the Group. An adverse outcome in such disputes might have a significant adverse effect on our operating results. See Note D.22.e) to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.
Environmental regulations are evolving (i.e., in Europe, REACH, CLP/GHS, SEVESO, IPPC, the Waste Framework Directive, the Emission Trading Scheme Directive, the Water Framework Directive and the Directive on Taxation of Energy Products and Electricity and several other regulations aiming at preventing global warming). Stricter environmental, safety and health laws and enforcement policies could result in substantial costs and liabilities to our Group and could subject our handling, manufacture, use, reuse or disposal of substances or pollutants, site restoration and compliance costs to more rigorous scrutiny than is currently the case. Consequently, compliance with these laws could result in significant capital expenditures as well as other costs and liabilities, thereby adversely affecting our business, results of operations or financial condition. For more detailed information on environmental issues, see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Health, Safety and Environment (HSE).
Risks Related to Financial Markets1
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Because we sell our products in numerous countries, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. We are particularly sensitive to movements in exchange rates between the euro and the U.S. dollar, the British pound, the Japanese yen, and to currencies in emerging countries. In 2011, 29.8% of our net sales were realized in the United States. While we incur expenses in those currencies, the impact of currency exchange rates on these expenses does not fully offset the impact of currency exchange rates on our revenues. As a result, currency exchange rate movements can have a considerable impact on our earnings. When deemed appropriate and when technically feasible, we enter into transactions to hedge our exposure to foreign exchange risks. These efforts, when undertaken, may fail to offset the effect of
adverse currency exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations or financial condition. In addition, in the specific context of the sovereign debt crisis affecting certain European countries, the alleged or actual disruption in the use of the euro as currency in one or more European Monetary Union countries and the associated fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a material effect on our financial condition and earnings, the magnitude and consequences of which are unpredictable. For more information concerning our exchange rate exposure, see Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
In the context of the worldwide financial crisis, our liquidity may be constrained.
As of December 31, 2011, the Groups net debt amounted approximately to 10.9 billion, an amount which increased substantially with the acquisition of Genzyme in 2011. In addition to debt outstanding, the Group has contracted a number of credit lines and put into place commercial paper and medium term note programs with the aim of providing liquidity. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. In the event of a market-wide liquidity crisis, the Group might be faced with reduced access to sources of financing, including under programs currently in place, or less favorable conditions.
Risks Relating to an Investment in our Shares or ADSs
Foreign exchange fluctuations may adversely affect the U.S. dollar value of our ADSs and dividends (if any).
Holders of ADSs face exchange rate risk. Our ADSs trade in U.S. dollars and our shares trade in euros. The value of the ADSs and our shares could fluctuate as the exchange rates between these currencies fluctuate. If and when we do pay dividends, they would be denominated in euros. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the euro and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by owners of ADSs upon conversion by the depositary of cash dividends, if any. Moreover, these fluctuations may affect the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), whether or not we pay dividends in addition to the amounts, if any, that a holder would receive upon our liquidation or upon the sale of assets, merger, tender offer or similar transactions denominated in euros or any foreign currency other than U.S. dollars.
Persons holding ADSs rather than shares may have difficulty exercising certain rights as a shareholder.
Holders of ADSs may have more difficulty exercising their rights as a shareholder than if they directly held shares. For example, if we offer new shares and they have the right to subscribe for a portion of them, the depositary is allowed, at its own discretion, to sell for their benefit that right to subscribe for new shares instead of making it available to them. Also, to exercise their voting rights, as holders of ADSs, they must instruct the depositary how to vote their shares. Because of this extra procedural step involving the depositary, the process for exercising voting rights will take longer for holders of ADSs than for holders of shares. ADSs for which the depositary does not receive timely voting instructions will not be voted at any meeting.
Our largest shareholders own a significant percentage of the share capital and voting rights of Sanofi.
As of December 31, 2011, LOréal and Total held approximately 8.82% and 3.22% of our issued share capital, respectively, accounting for approximately 15.69% and approximately 5.52%, respectively, of the voting rights (excluding treasury shares) of Sanofi. See Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions A. Major Shareholders. Affiliates of each of these shareholders are currently serving on our Board of Directors. To the extent these shareholders continue to hold a large percentage of our share capital and voting rights, LOréal and Total will remain in a position to exert heightened influence in the election of the directors and officers of Sanofi and in other corporate actions that require shareholders approval.
Sales of our shares may cause the market price of our shares or ADSs to decline.
Neither LOréal nor Total is, to our knowledge, subject to any contractual restrictions on the sale of the shares each holds in our Company. Both of these shareholders have announced that they do not consider their stakes in our Company as strategic to them, and Total makes regular sales of its holdings on the financial market. Sales of large numbers of our shares, or a perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price for our shares and ADSs.
Risks Relating to our Contingent Value Rights (CVRs)
In addition to the risks relating to our shares, CVR holders are subject to additional risks.
In connection with our acquisition of Genzyme, we issued CVRs under a CVR agreement entered into by and between us and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the trustee. A copy of the form of the CVR agreement is attached as exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form F-4 (Registration No. 333-172638), as amended. Pursuant to the CVR agreement, each holder of a CVR is entitled to receive cash payments upon the achievement of certain milestones, based on U.S. regulatory approval of Lemtrada (alemtuzumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis), and on achievement of certain aggregate net sales thresholds. See Item 10. Additional Information C. Material Contracts The Contingent Value Rights Agreement.
CVR holders are subject to additional risks, including:
Item 4. Information on the Company
We are a global pharmaceutical group engaged in the research, development, manufacture and marketing of healthcare products. In 2011, our net sales amounted to 33,389 million. We are the fifth largest pharmaceutical group in the world and the third largest pharmaceutical group in Europe (source: IMS sales 2011). Sanofi is the parent of a consolidated group of companies. A list of the principal subsidiaries included in this consolidation is shown at Note F. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.
Our business includes three main activities: Pharmaceuticals, Human Vaccines through Sanofi Pasteur and Animal Health products through Merial Limited (Merial).
In our Pharmaceuticals activity, which generated net sales of 27,890 million in 2011, our major product categories are:
The global pharmaceutical portfolio of Sanofi also comprises a wide range of other products in Consumer Health Care (CHC) and other prescription drugs including generics.
We are a world leader in the vaccines industry. Our net sales amounted to 3,469 million in 2011, with leading vaccines in five areas: pediatric combination vaccines, influenza vaccines, adult and adolescent booster vaccines, meningitis vaccines, and travel and endemics vaccines.
Our Animal Health activity is carried out through Merial, one of the worlds leading animal healthcare companies, dedicated to the research, development, manufacture and delivery of innovative pharmaceuticals and vaccines used by veterinarians, farmers and pet owners providing a comprehensive range of products to enhance the health, well-being and performance of a wide range of animals (production and companion animals). Our net sales amounted to 2,030 million in 2011.
In the description below, the following should be kept in mind:
A. History and Development of the Company
Sanofi was incorporated under the laws of France in 1994 as a société anonyme, a form of limited liability company, for a term of 99 years. We operate under the commercial name Sanofi (formerly sanofi-aventis). Our registered office is located at 54, rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France, and our main telephone number is +33 1 53 77 40 00. Our principal U.S. subsidiarys office is located at 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, NJ 08807; telephone: +1 (908) 981-5000.
We are present in approximately 100 countries on five continents with 113,719 employees at year end 2011. Our legacy companies, Sanofi-Synthélabo (formed by the 1999 merger of Sanofi and Synthélabo into the current holding company) and Aventis (formed by the combination of Rhône-Poulenc and Hoechst also in 1999), bring to the Group more than a century of experience in the pharmaceutical industry.
Sanofi was founded in 1973 by Elf Aquitaine, a French oil company, when it took control of the Labaz group, a pharmaceutical company. Its first significant venture into the U.S. market was the acquisition of the prescription pharmaceuticals business of Sterling Winthrop an affiliate of Eastman Kodak in 1994.
Synthélabo was founded in 1970 through the merger of two French pharmaceutical laboratories, Laboratoires Dausse (founded in 1834) and Laboratoires Robert & Carrière (founded in 1899). In 1973, the French cosmetics group LOréal acquired the majority of its share capital.
Hoechst traces its origins to the second half of the 19th century, to the time of the German industrial revolution and the emergence of the chemical industry. Traditionally active in pharmaceuticals, Hoechst strengthened its position in that industry by taking a controlling interest in Roussel-Uclaf in 1974 and the U.S. pharmaceutical company Marion Merrell in 1995.
Rhône-Poulenc was formed in 1928 from the merger of two French companies: a chemical company created by the Poulenc brothers and the Société Chimique des Usines du Rhône, which was founded in 1895. The companys activities in the first half of the 20th century focused on producing chemicals, textiles and pharmaceuticals. Rhône-Poulenc began to focus its activities on life sciences in the 1990s, which led to the successive purchases of Rorer, a U.S. pharmaceutical company acquired in two stages in 1990 and 1997, the remaining 49% of shares of Pasteur Mérieux Serums & Vaccins S.A. in 1994, and the U.K.-based pharmaceuticals company Fisons in 1995.
Sanofi-Synthélabo took control of Aventis in August 2004 and changed its registered name to sanofi-aventis. On December 31, 2004, Aventis merged with and into sanofi-aventis, with sanofi-aventis as the surviving company.
In 1994, Pasteur Mérieux Serums & Vaccins, the Groups vaccines division, together with the vaccines division of Merck & Co., Inc. formed Sanofi Pasteur MSD, creating the only European firm entirely dedicated to vaccines.
Merial was founded in 1997 as a combination of the animal health activities of Rhône-Poulenc and Merck. Merial was a joint venture in which we and Merck each held 50%. On September 17, 2009, we acquired Mercks entire interest in Merial. Merial became Sanofis dedicated animal health division following the joint statement issued by Merck and Sanofi in March 2011 announcing the end of their agreement to create a new animal health joint venture by combining their respective animal health segments. See Note D.2. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.
Starting in 2009, Sanofi made a series of acquisitions to create or strengthen our regional CHC and generics platforms including:
On April 4, 2011, we acquired Genzyme Corporation, a leading biotechnology group headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts and specialized in the treatment of rare diseases, renal diseases, endocrinology, oncology and biosurgery. Immediately following the tender offer, Sanofi held over 90% of Genzymes outstanding shares, and acquired the remaining shares in a short form merger on April 8, 2011. The agreement is described at Item 10. Additional Information C. Material Contracts.
As of the May 2011 General Meeting of Shareholders, the Group changed its name to Sanofi.
Sanofi is a diversified, global healthcare leader offering solutions across areas of core historical strength and multiple growth platforms. Like other pharmaceutical companies, we have been facing competition from generics for several of our major products, in an environment subject to cost containment pressures from both third party payers and healthcare authorities. Starting in 2009, we have responded to these major challenges by implementing a new strategy with the objective of repositioning Sanofi for more stable and sustainable revenue and earnings growth. During that time we have transformed the Company by decreasing our reliance on existing blockbuster medicines (medicines with over $1 billion in global sales), optimizing our approach to Research & Development (R&D), increasing our diversification, and investing in 6 growth platforms (Emerging Markets(1), Diabetes Solutions, Human Vaccines, Consumer Health Care, Animal Health, and Innovative Products). Additionally, we became a global leader in rare genetic diseases through our acquisition of Genzyme in 2011.
We regularly review our strategy and are continuing to execute on this strategy along three prongs:
We have conducted a complete review of our research and development portfolio since 2009, in order to improve the allocation of our resources. This review has led to a rationalization of our portfolio, focusing on high-value projects and reallocating part of our resources from internal infrastructure to partnerships and collaborations. We also redefined our decision-making processes so that commercial potential and the scope for value creation are better integrated into our development choices. We also redesigned our R&D footprint including increasing our presence in the Boston, MA area with its concentration of universities and innovative biotechnology companies. R&D is now based on an organizational structure focused on patient needs and encouraging entrepreneurship. This network-based organization, open to external opportunities, enables our R&D portfolio to more effectively capitalize on innovation, from a wide range of sources.
In line with this policy, we signed new alliance and licensing agreements in 2011 designed to give us access to new technologies, and/or to broaden or strengthen our existing fields of research (including diabetes, oncology and vaccines). Finally, we have made progress on our objective of offering more products that add value for patients, with five New Molecular Entities (NMEs) submitted to regulatory agencies in 2011, and 18 potential new product launches possible before the end of 2015.
Since 2009, we have adapted our operating model, from being focused on the best-selling prescription drugs in our traditional markets, to a broader set of products and services reflecting the diversity of our activities and our geographical reach. In particular, we tailored our strategy, structure and offering to each regions needs, so as to deliver the most appropriate solution to each patient. The result is a dramatic shift in business mix from Top 15 products to key growth platforms. In 2008, 61 % of our sales originated from our top 15 products while in 2011, 65 % of our sales originated from Genzyme and our growth platforms. Moreover, 30 % of our 2011 sales were in emerging markets where we have enhanced our offerings in high growth market segments such as Generics and Consumer Health Care by completing 17 transactions and investing a total of approximately 3.7 billion in acquisitions over the last three years.
We also realigned our industrial capacity to reflect our expectation of changes in volumes and our analyses of growth opportunities. Combined with the streamlining of our R&D structures and keeping a tight control on SG&A expenses, this has helped enable us to successfully navigate through a period where multiple of our leading products faced the loss of patent exclusivity protection, despite an often tougher economic environment with new healthcare cost containment measures in many markets.
Business development remains an integral and disciplined pillar of our overall strategy, targeting acquisitions and alliances that create and/or strengthen platforms for long-term growth and create value for our shareholders. Since January 2009, we have invested a total of approximately 23 billion in external growth accounting for approximately 20% increase in 2011 consolidated sales. During 2011, we pursued this targeted policy actively, announcing 30 new transactions, including three acquisitions and 27 R&D alliances. We successfully completed our acquisition of Genzyme, a global leader in rare genetic diseases and an emerging leader in multiple sclerosis. We also strengthened our Emerging Markets growth platform with the acquisition of Universal Medicare, advancing our sustainable growth strategy in India and facilitating the creation of a Consumer Health Care platform in that country. Our U.S. vaccines operations were reinforced with the acquisition of Topaz Pharmaceuticals, which complements our pediatric offering.
In the years to come, we expect our sound financial position to provide us the potential to create value via external growth opportunities and to strengthen our diversification and growth platforms through new acquisitions and partnerships. We will remain financially disciplined with the aim of our business development activities to execute strategically important transactions and partnerships that secure a return on investment in excess of our cost of capital.
Main Pharmaceutical Products
Within our Pharmaceuticals business, we focus on the following categories: diabetes, rare diseases, oncology, and other flagship products in anti-thrombotics, cardiovascular, renal and biosurgery fields.
The sections that follow provide additional information on the indications and market position of our key products. Our intellectual property rights over our pharmaceutical products are material to our operations and are described at Patents, Intellectual Property and Other Rights below. As disclosed in Item 8. Financial Information A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information Patents of this annual report, we are involved in significant litigation concerning the patent protection of a number of these products.
The following table sets forth the net sales of our best-selling pharmaceutical products for the year ended December 31, 2011. These products are major contributors to public health.
The prevalence of diabetes is expected to increase significantly over the next 20 years, reflecting multiple socio-economic factors including sedentary lifestyles, excess weight and obesity, unhealthy diet and an aging population. Our principal diabetes products are Lantus®, a long-acting analog of human insulin; Apidra®, a rapid-acting analog of human insulin; Insuman®, a human insulin; and Amaryl®, a sulfonylurea. In 2011, in some European markets, we launched the BGStar® solution range of blood glucose meters for patients with diabetes, whether they are treated with insulin or not.
Lantus® (insulin glargine) is a long-acting analog of human insulin, offering improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared to other basal insulins. Lantus® is indicated for once-daily subcutaneous administration in the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who require basal insulin for the control of hyperglycemia, and for adult and pediatric patients aged six years and above with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Lantus® is a well-established treatment with over 38 million patient-years exposure since 2000. The clinical trial experience with Lantus® covers over 100,000 patients.
Lantus® can be administered subcutaneously using syringes or specific pens including:
In September 2009, following four highly publicized but methodologically limited registry analyses, some of which created concern over a potential link between the use of Lantus® and an increased risk of cancer, we announced an action plan to provide methodologically robust research that will contribute to the scientific resolution of the debate over insulin safety, including insulin analogs and Lantus®. The research program encompasses both preclinical and clinical programs involving human insulin and insulin analogues, including insulin glargine; it is designed to generate more information on whether there is any association between cancer and insulin use, and to assess whether there is any difference in risk between different types of insulins. The plan is structured to yield short-term and longer-term results. Three epidemiological studies (two retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study) have been launched:
The ADA/ACS (American Diabetes Association / American Cancer Society) Consensus Report published on June 16, 2010 reasserted the inconclusiveness of any link between insulin and cancer.
In January 2011, the FDA updated its ongoing safety review of Lantus®. In addition to the analysis of the four registry analyses published in 2009, the FDA also reviewed results from a five-year diabetic retinopathy clinical trial in patients with type 2 Diabetes. Based on these data, the FDA has not concluded at this time that Lantus® increases the risk of cancer. FDA review remains ongoing.
In December 2011, results of new meta-analysis were presented at the World Diabetes Congress. This new meta-analysis of all published studiesobservational studies derived from databases as well as randomized controlled clinical trials and one case-control studyhas demonstrated no increased risk in people using Lantus® when compared to the users of human insulin.
The ADA and European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) have maintained their 2008 treatment recommendations for type 2 diabetes. These guidelines further established basal insulins such as Lantus®, or a sulfonylurea such as Amaryl®, as two preferred second-line treatment options for people with diabetes who are unable to achieve glycemic control targets with lifestyle intervention and metformin alone. These treatment recommendations reinforce the timely use of basal insulin as a core therapy for type 2 diabetes.
Lantus® is the world number-one selling insulin brand in terms of both sales and units (source: IMS, 2011 sales) and is available in over 70 countries worldwide. The three leading countries for sales of Lantus® in 2011 were the United States, France and Japan.
Apidra® (insulin glulisine) is a rapid-acting analog of human insulin. Apidra® is indicated for the treatment of adults with type 1 diabetes, or in type 2 diabetes for supplementary glycemic control. Apidra® has a more rapid onset and shorter duration of action than fast-acting human insulin and can be associated with long-acting insulins such as Lantus® for supplementary glycemic control at mealtime.
In addition, Apidra® is equally effective in adult diabetics ranging from lean to obese and offers patients greater flexibility of administration, either before or just after mealtime.
Apidra® can be administered subcutaneously using syringes or specific pens including the Apidra® SoloSTAR® disposable pen and the ClikSTAR® reusable pen.
Apidra® is available in over 60 countries worldwide.
Due to a technical incident on a manufacturing line, Apidra® faced a temporary shortage of Apidra® 3mL cartridges (including Apidra® SoloSTAR®) which impacted supplies in some markets. The production of Apidra® 3mL cartridges is expected to return to full capacity in the first half of 2012. Apidra® vials were not impacted.
Insuman® (human insulin) is a range of insulin solutions and suspensions for injection and is indicated for diabetes patients where treatment with insulin is required. Human insulin is produced by recombinant DNA technology in Escherichia coli strains.
Insuman® is supplied in vials, cartridges, pre-filled disposable pens (OptiSet® and SoloStar®) or reusable pens (ClickSTAR®) containing the active substance human insulin. The Insuman® range is comprised of rapid-acting insulin solutions (Insuman® Rapid and Insuman® Infusat) that contain soluble insulin, an intermediate-acting insulin suspension (Insuman® Basal) that contains isophane insulin, and combinations of fast- and intermediate-acting insulins in various proportions (Insuman® Comb). Insuman® is mostly sold in Germany.
Amaryl® (glimepiride) is a latest-generation, orally administered once-daily sulfonylurea (a glucose-lowering agent) indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Amaryl® reduces the bodys blood sugar level in two ways: by helping the body to produce more insulin both at mealtime and between meals, and by decreasing insulin resistance.
The combination of metformin (which reduces hepatic glucose production and decreases insulin resistance) with a sulfonylurea such as Amaryl® is effective in combating the two causes of type 2 diabetes. It is one of the most prescribed combinations of diabetes drugs worldwide. Amaryl M®, a fixed-dose combination of Amaryl® plus metformin in a single presentation, was launched in 2007.
Our leading market for Amaryl® is Japan, where it is the best-selling oral anti-diabetes product by volume (source: IMS 2011 sales). A number of generics have received marketing authorization and have been launched in Europe and the United States. Generic became available in Japan in November 2010 but the impact on Amaryl® sales compared to the impact of generic sales generally observed in the U.S. or the EU has been more moderate.
BGStar® / iBGStar
Sanofi and its partner AgaMatrix are co-developing innovative solutions in diabetes care with the aim of simplifying the diabetes management experience for patients and healthcare providers. The blood glucose monitoring solutions will be exclusive to Sanofi and are designed to be synergistic with our Diabetes portfolio, with a positive effect on sales of Lantus® and other products expected.
BGStar® and iBGStar are blood glucose meters that feature Dynamic Electrochemistry®, an innovative technology that extracts a spectrum of information from blood that is inaccessible to traditional electrochemical methods and compensates for many interfering factors that often distort blood glucose results.
These monitoring devices are an important step towards our vision of becoming the global leader in diabetes care by integrating innovative monitoring technology, therapeutic innovations, personalized services and support solutions. During 2011, the BGStar® and iBGStar were made commercially available in Germany, France, Switzerland, Spain, the Netherlands and Italy.
In December 2011, the FDA approved the iBGStar the first blood glucose meter that connects to the iPhone® allowing patients to view and analyze accurate, reliable information in real time.
The main compounds currently in Phase II or III clinical development in the Diabetes/Other Metabolic Disorders field are:
Phase I studies on combination of lixisenatide and Lantus® have been successfully finalized. A proof-of-concept study to compare insulin glargine/ lixisenatide fixed ratio combination versus insulin glargine on glycemic control over 24 weeks has begun.
Sanofi is present in the oncology field, primarily in chemotherapy, with three major products: Taxotere®, Eloxatine®, and Jevtana®, which was launched commercially in the United States in 2010 and in the second quarter of 2011 in Europe.
Taxotere® (docetaxel), a taxoid class derivative, inhibits cancer cell division by essentially freezing the cells internal skeleton, which is comprised of microtubules. Microtubules assemble and disassemble during a cell cycle. Taxotere® promotes their assembly and blocks their disassembly, thereby preventing many cancer cells from dividing and resulting in death in many cancer cells.
Taxotere® is available in more than 100 countries as an injectable solution. The single vial formulation (one vial IV route 20-80mg) was launched in the U.S. and in the European Union in 2010. It has gained approval for use in eleven indications in five different tumor types (breast, prostate, gastric, lung, and head and neck). Taxotere® is indicated for early stage and metastatic breast cancer, first-line and second-line metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), androgen-independent (hormone-refractory) metastatic prostate cancer, advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction), and the induction treatment of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
The top four countries contributing to sales of Taxotere® in 2011 were the United States, Japan, France, and China. Generics of docetaxel were launched at the end of 2010 in Europe and in April 2011 in the U.S. Exclusivity for Taxotere® in Japan will be maintained through November 2013 (see Patents, Intellectual Property and Other Rights below).
Eloxatin® (oxaliplatin) is a platinum-based cytotoxic agent. Eloxatin® combined with infusional (delivered through the bloodstream) administration of two other chemotherapy drugs, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (the FOLFOX regimen), is approved by the FDA for adjuvant treatment of people with stage III colon cancer who have had their primary (original) tumors surgically removed. This approval was based on evidence of an improvement in disease-free survival after four years.
Eloxatin® is in-licensed from Debiopharm and is marketed in more than 70 countries worldwide.
Following the end of the Eloxatin® European regulatory data exclusivity in April 2006, a number of oxaliplatin generics have been launched throughout Europe. With regard to the U.S. market, a number of oxaliplatin generics received final marketing authorization from the FDA and were marketed until June 30, 2010, when their manufacturers were ordered by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey to cease selling their unauthorized Eloxatin® generic in the United States. Eloxatin U.S. market exclusivity is expected to be maintained through August 9, 2012. See Item 8. Financial Information A. Consolidated Financial Statements and other Financial Information Patents.
Jevtana® (cabazitaxel) is a new taxane derivative approved in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-containing treatment regimen. Jevtana® was the result of a 14-year research and development program to address the significant unmet medical need after taxane-based treatment progression.
The results of the TROPIC Phase III study demonstrated that cabazitaxel plus prednisone/prednisolone significantly improved overall survival versus the standard regimen of mitoxantrone plus prednisone/prednisolone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer whose disease progressed following treatment with docetaxel-based chemotherapy. A combination of cabazitaxel and prednisone/prednisolone significantly reduced the risk of death by 28% with an improvement in median overall survival of 15.1 months vs. 12.7 months in the mitoxantrone combination arm.
Jevtana® was launched in the United States in July 2010. Jevtana® therapy is now covered by CMS (Committee for Medicare and Medicaid Services), and by most of the private insurance companies that pay for oncology care. In addition, the safety profile seen in clinical practice has been consistent with that seen in the pivotal TROPIC study.
In March 2011, Jevtana® received marketing authorization from the European Commission and was launched during the second quarter of 2011 in Germany and France. Jevtana® is now approved in 53 countries.
Sanofi has initiated a broad development program with Jevtana®. The clinical program is projected to evaluate Jevtana® in first- and second-line treatment of prostate cancer patients, second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients, and patients with advanced gastric cancer.
The top four countries contributing to sales of Jevtana® in 2011 were the United States, Germany, Brazil and France.
The main compounds currently in Phase II or III clinical development in the Oncology field are:
In 2011, we conducted several additional collaborations with other companies, universities and institutes to investigate novel oncology agents (see Pharmaceutical Research & Development Portfolio below).
Collaborations with Regeneron
We and Regeneron globally collaborate on the development and commercialization of Zaltrap®. Under the terms of our September 2003 collaboration agreement, as amended, we and Regeneron will share co-promotion rights and profits on sales, if any, of Zaltrap® outside of Japan for disease indications included in our collaboration. In Japan, Sanofi will develop and commercialize Zaltrap®, with Regeneron entitled to a royalty payment. Under the terms of the agreement, Sanofi is responsible for funding 100% of the development costs of Zaltrap®. Once Zaltrap® starts to be marketed, Regeneron will repay 50% of the development costs (originally paid by Sanofi) in accordance with a formula based on Regenerons share of the profits. Sanofi may also be responsible for making milestone payments upon receipt of specified marketing approvals for Zaltrap® in the United States or the European Union and in Japan.
In November 2007, Sanofi signed additional agreements with Regeneron to discover, develop and commercialize fully-human therapeutic antibodies. These agreements were broadened, and their term extended, on November 10, 2009. Under the terms of the discovery agreement, Sanofi committed to fund the costs of Regenerons antibody research program until 2017. Sanofi has an option to license for further development those antibodies discovered by Regeneron which advance to IND. Upon exercise of the option, Sanofi is primarily responsible for funding the development and co-developing the antibody with Regeneron. Sanofi and Regeneron would also share co-promotion rights and profits on sales. Once a product begins to be marketed, Regeneron will repay out of its profits (provided they are sufficient) 50% of the development costs borne by Sanofi for all antibodies licensed by Sanofi. Sanofi may also be responsible for making milestone payments based upon aggregate sales of antibodies under the collaboration.
The acquisition of Genzyme in April 2011 brought to the Group specific expertise in rare diseases, a sector where there are still many unmet needs, and expanded Sanofis presence in the biotechnology sector.
Our Rare Disease business is focused on products for the treatment of rare genetic diseases and other chronic debilitating diseases, including lysosomal storage disorders, or LSDs, a group of metabolic disorders caused by enzyme deficiencies. Our principle rare disease products are enzyme replacement therapies: Cerezyme® (imiglucerase for injection) to treat Gaucher disease; Fabrazyme® (agalsidase beta) to treat Fabry disease and Myozyme® / Lumizyme® (alglucosidase alfa) to treat Pompe disease.
Cerezyme® (imiglucerase for injection) is an enzyme replacement therapy that is used to treat Gaucher disease, an inherited, potentially life-threatening LSD. It is estimated that there are approximately 10,000 Gaucher patients worldwide.
Cerezyme® is the only therapy with a 17-year history of reducing, relieving and reversing many of the symptoms and risks of Type 1 Gaucher disease. Cerezyme® is administered by intravenous infusion over 1-2 hours.
In June 2009, Genzyme interrupted production of Cerezyme® and Fabrazyme® at its Allston facility after identifying a virus in a bioreactor used for Cerezyme® production. Genzyme resumed Cerezyme® shipments in the fourth quarter of 2009. This interruption was followed by a second one in March 2010 resulting from a municipal electrical power failure that compounded issues with the facilitys water system.
Genzyme communicated at the end of 2011 that, given current productivity and progress in the manufacturing recovery, we expect an improving supply outlook as the year progresses. We have begun communicating with the U.S. Gaucher community to inform them that, beginning in February 2012, current patients in the U.S. can be returned to normal dosing. Genzyme will also begin the process of returning additional regions globally back to normal supply. This process will begin in the second quarter of 2012 and continue gradually through the remainder of the year, to ensure that a ramp-up can be sustained. Regions outside of the U.S. will be maintained at their current allocation of Cerezyme®, as Genzyme assesses the timing of the return of additional regions to full supply. No regional allocation will be decreased to accommodate the U.S. ramp-up. We continue to make Cerezyme® available to patients as it is produced. However, since we have minimal inventory, any change to our manufacturing plans can have an immediate impact on our ability to provide product.
The principal markets for Cerezyme® are the United States, Latin America and Europe.
Fabrazyme® (agalsidase beta) is an enzyme replacement therapy that is used to treat Fabry disease, an inherited, progressive and potentially life-threatening LSD. Fabry disease is estimated to affect between 5,000 and 10,000 people worldwide. Fabrazyme® is administered by intravenous infusion.
Fabrazyme® is available in over 30 countries, including the United States and Europe, and has been used in hundreds of patients.
Due to the June 2009 production interruption and low manufacturing productivity upon re-start of production, Fabrazyme® shipments decreased in the fourth quarter of 2009 and Genzyme began shipping Fabrazyme® at a rate equal to 30% of estimated product demand. Throughout 2011, Genzyme has maintained consistent supply of Fabrazyme® to current patients at a reduced dose. To return to normal supply levels of Fabrazyme® for existing and new patients, it will be necessary to utilize the additional capacity from Genzymes new manufacturing facility in Framingham, Massachusetts, that was approved in January 2012 by the FDA and the EMA. Genzyme will begin the process of moving the most severely affected patients in Europe to full dose of Fabrazyme® during the first quarter of 2012. Beginning in March 2012 in the U.S., all patients currently on therapy are expected to be able to return to full dosing (1mg/kg). In addition, Genzyme will begin to transition
new patients in the U.S. onto Fabrazyme® at full dosing (1mg/kg) levels. Beginning of March, Genzyme started shipping Fabrazyme® from Framingham. Globally, the return to normal supply levels of Fabrazyme® is expected to begin in the second quarter of 2012 and continue throughout the year as planned, as Genzyme works to obtain all global regulatory approvals throughout the year and to build inventory.
The principal markets for Fabrazyme® are the United States and Europe.
Myozyme® / Lumizyme®
Myozyme® / Lumizyme® (alglucosidase alfa) are enzyme replacement therapies used to treat Pompe disease, an inherited, progressive and often fatal LSD. We estimate that there are approximately 10,000 Pompe patients worldwide.
Myozyme® has been marketed since 2006 in the United States and the EU and is currently available in 48 markets worldwide. Lumizyme® is the first treatment approved in the United States specifically to treat patients with late-onset Pompe disease: Lumizyme® has been marketed since June 2010. Myozyme® and Lumizyme® are administered by intravenous infusion. Lumizyme® is used to treat Pompe disease in patients over 8 years of age without evidence of cardiac hypertrophy.
Both products are a recombinant form of the same human enzyme but are manufactured using different sized bioreactors.
The main compounds currently in Phase II or III clinical development in the Rare Diseases field are:
Other Flagship Products
Lovenox® (enoxaparin sodium) is available in over 100 countries, it has been used to treat over 350 million patients since its launch.
Lovenox® has the broadest range of indications amongst low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). A comprehensive clinical development plan has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of Lovenox® in the prevention and treatment of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) and in the management of the full spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
In VTE management, Lovenox® is continuing to grow as a treatment for the prevention of VTE, mainly in acutely ill patients not undergoing surgery.
In 2008, new oral anticoagulants were launched for the prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery and were approved in 2011 for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, with the objective to replace vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin). However, the impact has been limited on Lovenox® usage as prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery is a small segment of Lovenox® usage and as stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is not a Lovenox® approved indication.
In VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients, a major market segment for Lovenox®, two large clinical trials have compared new oral anti-coagulants to Lovenox®: extended prophylaxis using new oral anti-coagulants has not shown added benefit compared to short term prophylaxis using Lovenox®.
Competing generics of enoxaparin were launched respectively in July 2010 and in February 2012 in the U.S. An authorized generic is available in the U.S.. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Impacts from generic competition.
In 2011, Lovenox® was the leading anti-thrombotic in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (source: IMS 2011 sales).
Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate), a platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist with a rapid onset of action that selectively inhibits platelet aggregation induced by ADP, is indicated for long-term prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with a history of recent myocardial infarction, recent ischemic stroke or established peripheral arterial disease. Plavix® is indicated for the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis regardless of the location of the arteries initially affected (heart, brain, lower limbs). This indication is supported by the results of the landmark CAPRIE trial, including almost 20,000 patients. CAPRIE demonstrated the superior efficacy of Plavix® over acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, the active ingredient of Aspirin®), with a comparable safety profile.
Following the significant results of several clinical trials, involving a total of almost 62,000 patients, Plavix® is now also indicated for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with and without ST segment elevation in combination with ASA.
Plavix® is also available in a 300 mg tablet that reinforces early use by simplifying its approved loading dose administration in patients with ACS.
In January 2011, on the basis of the ACTIVE A study results (7,554 patients), the EMA granted marketing authorization for Plavix® in combination with ASA for the prevention of atherothrombotic and thromboembolic events, including stroke, in patients with atrial fibrillation who have at least one risk factor for vascular events, are not suitable for treatment with Vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and have a low bleeding risk.
A Phase III mortality and shunt-related morbidity study in infants palliated with a systemic to pulmonary artery shunt was completed in 2010. Even though results did not support an indication in such infants, the FDA granted Sanofi an additional six month period of exclusivity to market Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate). Exclusivity for Plavix® in the U.S. is now scheduled to expire on May 17, 2012.
To further characterize patient responsiveness to Plavix® and provide the best guidance to healthcare professionals, a clinical program designed in close collaboration with the FDA has been completed by Sanofi and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). Based on this program the label was updated worldwide in 2010, including new results on the pharmacological interaction of omeprazole with Plavix® and recent pharmaco-genomics data which have shown genomic variability of the response to Plavix® treatment (diminished effectiveness in poor metabolizers). This has been highlighted in the U.S. label with a boxed warning.
The extensive clinical development program for Plavix®, including all completed, ongoing and planned studies, is among the largest of its kind, involving more than 130,000 patients overall. Plavix® indications are incorporated into major scientific guidelines in North America, Europe and Japan. Over 115 million patients are estimated to have been treated with Plavix® since its launch in 1998, providing significant evidence of real-life efficacy and safety experience with this product.
CoPlavix® / DuoPlavin®, a fixed dose combination of clopidogrel bisulfate and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), is indicated for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome who are already taking both clopidogrel and ASA. The combination has already been launched in several countries (including Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland, Spain, and Mexico).
The marketing of Plavix® / CoPlavix® / DuoPlavin® is organized through our alliance with BMS (see Alliance with BMS below). Sales of Plavix® in Japan are consolidated by Sanofi and are outside the scope of our alliance with BMS.
Plavix® is the leading anti-platelet in the U.S., Chinese and Japanese markets (source: IMS 2011 sales). In Europe, a number of generics have received marketing authorization and have been launched. Plavix® market
share (1) by value was 29.1% in Western Europe and 27.2% in Germany (source: IMS 2011 sales). In Canada, generics were launched in December 2011. Plavix® U.S. market exclusivity is expected to be maintained through May 2012.
Aprovel®/Avapro ® /Karvea®
Aprovel® (irbesartan) is an anti-hypertensive belonging to the class of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. These highly effective and well tolerated antagonists act by blocking the effect of angiotensin II, the hormone responsible for blood vessel contraction, thereby enabling blood pressure to return to normal. In addition to Aprovel®/Avapro®/Karvea®, we also market CoAprovel®/Avalide®/Karvezide®, a fixed dose combination of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), a diuretic that increases the excretion of water and sodium by the kidneys and provides an additional blood pressure lowering effect. These products achieve control of blood pressure in over 80% of patients, with a very good safety profile.
Aprovel® and CoAprovel® tablets are available in a wide range of dosages to fit the needs of patients with different levels of hypertension severity.
Aprovel® is indicated as a first-line treatment for hypertension and for the treatment of nephropathy in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. CoAprovel® is indicated in patients whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled with a monotherapy, but also as initial therapy in patients who are likely to need multiple drugs to achieve their blood pressure goals (in the United States only).
Aprovel® and CoAprovel® are marketed in more than 80 countries. The marketing of Aprovel® and CoAprovel® is organized through an alliance with BMS (see Alliance with BMS below). In Japan, the product is licensed/sub-licensed to Shionogi Co. Ltd and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. Ltd, respectively. Aprovel® U.S. market exclusivity is expected to be maintained through March 2012.
Alliance with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS)
Plavix® and Aprovel® are marketed through a series of alliances with BMS. The alliance agreements include marketing and financial arrangements that vary depending on the country in which the products are marketed.
Three principal marketing arrangements are used in the BMS alliance:
Under the alliance arrangements, there are two territories, one under our operational management and the other under the operational management of BMS. The territory under our operational management consists of Europe and most of Africa and Asia, while the territory under the operational management of BMS consists of the rest of the world excluding Japan. In Japan, Aprovel® has been marketed jointly by Shionogi Pharmaceuticals and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. Ltd since June 2008. The BMS alliance does not cover rights to Plavix® in Japan; sales of Plavix® in Japan are consolidated by Sanofi.
In the territory under our operational management, the marketing arrangements are as follows:
In the territory under BMS operational management, the marketing arrangements are as follows:
In countries where the products are marketed by BMS on a co-marketing basis, or through alliances under the operational management of BMS, we often sell the active ingredients for the products to BMS or associated entities.
The financial impact of our principal alliances on our financial position and income is significant, and is described under Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Financial Presentation of Alliances; see also Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business We rely on third parties for the marketing of some of our products for more information relating to risks in connection with our alliance agreements.
Multaq® (dronedarone) is the most extensively studied anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and has demonstrated a unique cardiovascular (CV) outcome benefit in the ATHENA study in addition to effective rhythm control in the EURIDIS and ADONIS studies.
Multaq® is a multichannel blocker with both rhythm (prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrences) and rate (decrease of ventricular rate) controlling properties and additional effects (anti-hypertensive, vasodilatory). It is the first and only anti-arrhythmic drug to have shown a significant reduction in cardiovascular hospitalization and death in patients with paroxysmal and persistent Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter as seen in the ATHENA study.
The landmark ATHENA trial is the only double-blind anti-arrhythmic study in patients with AF to have assessed morbidity-mortality. The study enrolled a total of 4,628 patients. In this trial, the efficacy and safety of Multaq® was evaluated in patients with AF/AFL or a recent history of these conditions. Multaq® 400mg twice a day, in addition to standard therapy, was shown to significantly reduce the risk of first cardiovascular hospitalization or death by 24% (p<0.001) when compared to placebo, meeting the studys primary endpoint. In a secondary analysis of the ATHENA trial, Multaq® significantly reduced the total number of hospital days versus placebo.
Following reports in January 2011 of hepatocellular liver injury and hepatic failure in patients receiving Multaq®, including two post-marketing reports of acute hepatic failure requiring transplantation, Sanofi has collaborated with health authorities agencies to update prescribing information and include liver function monitoring. In Europe, EMA has then coordinated a review of all available data concerning the possible risks of liver injury associated with the use of Multaq® and their impact on its benefit-risk balance. The review was extended to include cardiovascular safety of Multaq® following premature termination of the PALLAS study (Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion outcome Study) in July 2011.
The PALLAS study, using dronedarone on top of standard therapy, was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg twice-daily to placebo in patients with permanent AF, a population different from the population with non-permanent AF for which Multaq® is currently approved. The study was discontinued in July 2011 following recommendation from the studys Operations Committee and the Data Monitoring Committee which observed a significant increase in cardiovascular events in the dronedarone arm. The decision to terminate the study was not related to any hepatic adverse event.
The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) confirmed in September 2011 that the benefits of Multaq® continue to outweigh the risks with a revised indication for the treatment of a limited, newly defined population of paroxysmal and persistent Atrial Fibrillation patients. Multaq® is indicated for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful cardioversion in adult clinically stable patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Due to its safety profile, Multaq® should only be prescribed after alternative treatment options have been considered and should not be given to patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or to patients with current or previous episodes of heart failure.
The FDA approved a label update in December 2011 to ensure its use in the appropriate patient population, specifically in patients in sinus rhythm with history of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and reinforcing warnings and precautions for use.
Multaq® has a convenient fixed dose regimen of twice daily 400 mg tablets to be taken with morning and evening meals. Treatment with Multaq® does not require a loading dose and it can be initiated in an outpatient setting.
Multaq® has been launched in 39 countries. The three leading countries for sales of Multaq® in 2011 were the United States, Germany and Spain.
Renagel® and Renvela®
Renagel® (sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate) are oral phosphate binders used by chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on dialysis to treat a condition called hyperphosphatemia, or elevated phosphorus levels, which is associated with heart and bone disease. Renvela® is a second generation, buffered phosphate binder.
In the United States, there are an estimated 395,000 dialysis patients, approximately 90% of whom receive a phosphate binder. There are an estimated 350,000 dialysis patients in the EU and 65,000 in Brazil. In the EU, Renvela® is also approved to treat CKD patients not on dialysis but who have very high blood phosphorus levels.
The principal markets for Renagel® are the United States, the EU and Brazil. The principal markets for Renvela®, which was first marketed in 2008, are the United States and the EU (launched in 2010). In 2011, new launches took place in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Israel, Columbia, Panama and Switzerland.
We market Renagel® and Renvela® directly to nephrologists through Genzymes employee sales force and distribute these products through wholesalers and distributors. In Japan and several Pacific Rim countries, Renagel® is developed and marketed by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd and its sublicensee, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.
The top five countries contributing to the sales of our Renal portfolio in 2011 were the U.S., Italy, France, the UK, and Brazil.
Synvisc® and Synvisc-One® (hylan G-F 20) are viscosupplements used to treat pain associated with osteoarthritis of certain joints. Synvisc® is a triple-injection product and Synvisc-One® is our next-generation, single-injection product. The principal viscosupplementation market is treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee.
The principal markets for Synvisc® are the U.S., the EU, and Japan (where launch took place in December 2010). The principal markets for Synvisc-One® are the United States and the EU, markets in which Synvisc-One® was first approved in 2009 and 2007, respectively.
We market Synvisc® and Synvisc-One® through Genzymes employee sales force directly to physicians, hospitals, and pharmacies. We distribute these products directly and through independent distributors. In Japan, Synvisc® is marketed and distributed by Teijin Pharma Limited.
The top five countries contributing to Synvisc® and Synvisc-One® sales in 2011 were the U.S., Japan, Canada, France, and Germany.
Other pharmaceutical products
Stilnox® (zolpidem tartrate) is indicated in the short-term treatment of insomnia. Stilnox® rapidly induces sleep that is qualitatively close to natural sleep and devoid of certain side effects that are characteristic of the benzodiazepine class as a whole. Its action lasts for a minimum of six hours, and it is generally well tolerated, allowing the patient to awaken with a reduced risk of impaired attention, decreased alertness or memory lapses throughout the day.
We have developed a controlled release formulation of zolpidem tartrate, marketed only in the United States under the brand name Ambien® CR.
Stilnox® is marketed in over 100 countries. It was launched in Japan under the brand name Myslee® in December 2000. Myslee® has been co-promoted jointly with Astellas since 2006. Myslee® is the leading hypnotic in Japan (source: IMS 2011).
Generic zolpidem tartrate has been available in Europe since 2004. In the United States, generics of the immediate release formulation of Ambien® have been available since 2007. Ambien® CR generics entered the U.S. market in October 2010. In Japan, competing generics of Myslee® are likely to enter the market in 2012.
Allegra® (fexofenadine hydrochloride) is a long-lasting (12- and 24-hour) non-sedating prescription anti-histamine for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (hay fever) and for the treatment of uncomplicated hives. It offers patients significant relief from allergy symptoms without causing drowsiness.
We also market Allegra-D® 12 Hour and Allegra-D® 24 Hour, anti-histamine/decongestant combination products with an extended-release decongestant for effective non-drowsy relief of seasonal allergy symptoms, including nasal congestion. Generics of most forms of Allegra®/Tefast® have been approved in our major markets, with the notable exception of Japan.
In March 2011, in the U.S., Allegra® family moved to over-the-counter (OTC) use in adults and children two years of age and older (see Consumer Health Care below).
Allegra®/Telfast® is marketed in approximately 80 countries. The largest market for prescriptions of Allegra® is Japan. In Japan, competing generics of Allegra® may possibly enter the market in the second half of 2012 if the generic manufacturers get marketing approvals. Sanofi appealed at the IP High Court to defend two Allegra® use patents following their invalidation by the patent office (for more information see Item 8 Financial Information A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information Information on Legal or Arbitration Proceedings).
Copaxone® (glatiramer acetate) is a non-interferon immunomodulating agent indicated for reducing the frequency of relapses in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Copaxone® is available as a self-injectable pre-filled syringe storable at room temperature for up to one month.
This disease-modifying drug is characterized by an original and specific mode of action on multiple sclerosis. Clinical studies have shown that Copaxone® is more effective than placebo at two years, but also that it has a clinical efficacy over 15 years both in reducing relapses and progression of disability. A significant effect on lesions has also been confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
In 2009, the U.K. Medicine and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved an expanded label for Copaxone® to include the treatment of patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis.
We have marketed Copaxone® outside the United States and Canada through our alliance with Teva. As of February 29, 2012 we no longer market or sell Copaxone®: on a country-by-country basis, we instead receive a payment of 6% on sales from Teva for a period of two years from the date of transfer (see Alliance with Teva below).
Alliance with Teva
We in-licensed Copaxone® from Teva and marketed it until 2012 through an agreement with Teva, which was originally entered into in 1995, and has been amended several times, most recently in 2005.
Under the agreement with Teva, marketing and financial arrangements vary depending on the country in which the products are marketed.
Sales and distribution rights were returned to Teva in 2008 for the United States and Canada.
Outside the United States and Canada, there were two principal marketing arrangements:
Under the terms of our agreement, the Copaxone® business has been transferred to Teva over a period running from the third quarter of 2009 to February 29, 2012 depending on the country. Following the transfer, Sanofi will receive from Teva a royalty of 6% for a period of two years, on a country-by-country basis. In September 2009, the Copaxone® business was transferred to Teva in Switzerland and Lichtenstein. In 2010, the Copaxone® business was transferred to Teva in Poland, in the Czech Republic and in the United Kingdom. In 2011, the Copaxone® business was transferred to Teva in Norway, Germany, Austria, Portugal, and Sweden. In January and February 2012 the Copaxone® business was transferred to Teva in Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Greece, Cyprus, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Australia, and New Zealand.
Tritace ®/Triatec® /Delix®/Altace®
Tritace® (ramipril) is an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor indicated for the treatment of hypertension, congestive heart failure following or in the absence of acute myocardial infarction, and nephropathy. Tritace® is the only ACE inhibitor approved for the prevention of stroke, myocardial infarction and death in high-risk patients and has the broadest spectrum of indications among ACE inhibitors for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
The combinations with diuretics (ramipril + hydrochlorothiazide) and calcium channel blockers (ramipril + felodipine) are available in Europe.
Tritace® is marketed in over 70 countries. A number of generics have received marketing authorization and have been launched since December 2001 in Europe.
Depakine® (sodium valproate) is a broad-spectrum anti-epileptic that has been prescribed for more than 40 years. Numerous clinical trials and long years of experience have shown that it is effective for all types of epileptic seizures and epileptic syndromes, and is generally well tolerated. Consequently, Depakine® remains a reference treatment for epilepsy worldwide.
Depakine® is also a mood stabilizer, registered in the treatment of manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder and, in numerous countries, in the prevention of mood episodes. Depakine® is recommended as a first
line treatment in these indications by international guidelines such as the guidelines of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines 2009, the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments 2009, and the British Association for Psychopharmacology 2009.
We provide a wide range of formulations of Depakine® enabling it to be adapted to most types of patients: syrup, oral solution, injection, enteric-coated tablets, Depakine® Chrono (a sustained release formulation in tablets) and Depakine® Chronosphere (sustained release formulation of Depakine® packaged in stick packs, facilitating its use by children, the elderly and adults with difficulties swallowing).
Depakine® is marketed in over 100 countries.
Xatral® (alfuzosin hydrochloride) belongs to the class of alpha1-blockers. Capable of acting selectively on the lower urinary tract, it was the first alpha1-blocker indicated and marketed exclusively for the treatment of symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It is also the only alpha1-blocker indicated as an adjunctive therapy with catheterization for acute urinary retention, a painful and distressing complication of BPH.
Xatral® OD (extended release formulation) is active from the first dose, provides rapid and lasting symptom relief, and improves patient quality of life. Xatral® is the only alpha1-blocker showing no deleterious effect on ejaculation, as shown by the final results of the international ALF-LIFE trial. The once-daily formulation of Xatral® (branded Uroxatral® in the United States) has been registered in over 90 countries and is marketed worldwide, with the exception of Australia and Japan.
Generic alfuzosin became available in most European countries in 2009. Generics of the extended release formulation of alfuzosin became available in the U.S. in July 2011.
Actonel® (risedronate sodium) belongs to the bisphosphonate class that helps prevent osteoporotic fractures.
Actonel® is the only osteoporosis treatment that reduces the risk of both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in as little as six months. Actonel® also provides reduced risk of fracture at all key osteoporotic sites: vertebral, hip and non-vertebral sites, studied as a composite endpoint (hip, wrist, humerus, clavicle, leg and pelvis).
Actonel® is available in various dosage strengths and combination forms to better suit patient needs. Depending on dosage form, Actonel® is indicated for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis, osteoporosis in men, or Pagets disease.
Actonel® is marketed in more than 75 countries through an alliance with Warner Chilcott see Note C.2 to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.
The contribution of this alliance on our financial position and income is described under Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Financial Presentation of Alliances. See Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business We rely on third parties for the marketing of some of our products for more information relating to risk in connection with our alliance agreements.
Nasacort®AQ Spray (NAQ) (triamcinolone acetonide) is an unscented, water-based metered-dose pump spray formulation unit containing a microcrystalline suspension of triamcinolone acetonide in an aqueous medium. Previously indicated for the treatment of the nasal symptoms of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis in adults and children six years of age and older, Nasacort® AQ received an additional approval for the seasonal and annual treatment of pediatric patients between the ages of two and five years from the FDA in September 2008. NAQ is an intranasal corticosteroid, which is recommended in treatment guidelines as first-line treatment for moderate to severe allergic rhinitis patients.
Following a settlement of patent litigation, a competing generic triamcinolone acetonide has been sold in the United States since June 2011.
Main compounds currently in Phase II or III clinical development:
In the Multiple Sclerosis field:
In the context of a business combination prior to the Sanofi takeover, Genzyme acquired in May 2009, from Bayer Schering Pharma A.G (Bayer), development rights and world marketing rights for alemtuzumab. Genzyme also acquired the rights for the products Fludara® and Leukine®. Alemtuzumab is already approved in oncology as the product Campath® (also acquired from Bayer). In exchange, Bayer was granted the right to co-promote Lemtrada on a global basis, as well as the right to receive contingent payments (for more information See Note D.1.1. to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report at Item 18). In connection with the acquisition of Genzyme, Sanofi issued contingent value rights (CVR) entitling holders to cash payments upon the achievement of certain milestones, including regulatory approval of alemtuzumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis and on achievements of certain aggregate sales thresholds (see Item 10. Additional Information C. Material contracts The Contingent Value Rights Agreement.)
In the Ophthalmology field:
Sanofi acquired the French ophthalmology specialist Fovea in October 2009. Products in the pipeline include:
Oxford BioMedica entered into collaboration with Sanofi in April 2009 to develop novel gene-based medicines, utilizing LentiVector® gene delivery technology, for the treatment of ocular disease. The agreement covers four LentiVector®-based product candidates for different ophthalmologic indications such as wet age-related macular degeneration, Stargardt disease, Usher syndrome, and corneal graft rejection.
In the Thrombosis and Cardiovascular field:
In the Internal Medicine field:
Consumer Health Care (CHC)
Consumer Health Care is a core growth platform identified in our broader strategy for achieving sustainable growth. In 2011, we recorded CHC sales of 2,666 million; nearly half of our CHC sales were in emerging markets, 24% in Europe, and 21% in the United States.
In March 2011, the Allegra® family of allergy medication products was commercially launched in the U.S. for over-the-counter (OTC) use in adults and children two years of age and older. The Allegra® family of OTC products is available in drug, grocery, mass merchandiser, and club stores nationwide. This switch constitutes a key step in our CHC growth strategy in the U.S. The Allegra® family of OTC products is the number one OTC brand for Sanofi globally.
2011 CHC sales were also supported by our legacy CHC brands, which provides us with a strong presence in the fever & pain and digestive health areas.
Complementary to our legacy CHC business, well-known brands are:
In August 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Indian domestic branded formulations business of Universal Medicare, one of the leading providers in the country of nutraceuticals and lifestyle management products including vitamins, antioxidants, mineral supplements, and anti-arthritics.
The top three countries contributing to our CHC sales in 2011 were the United States, France, and Russia.
In 2011, sales of the generics business grew by 16.2% to 1,746 million led by sales in Emerging Markets and in the United States. U.S. generic business growth was driven by sales of recent launches of authorized generics of Taxotere®, Ambien® CR and Lovenox®. Authorized generic of Taxotere® launched in March 2011 has captured more than 10% of docetaxel generics (source: IMS December 2011). Sales in Emerging Markets were supported by the roll out of Medley products in additional countries in Latin America. In 2011, sales of generic products in Emerging Markets exceeded 1 billion. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2010 Net Sales by Product Pharmaceuticals.
In March 2009 we created our European Generics Platform, covering generics activities across Western and Eastern Europe, Russia and Turkey. In 2010, we decided to rebrand all our European generics businesses under the Zentiva name. This means that the generics businesses of Winthrop and Helvepharm in France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Portugal and the United Kingdom now operate under the Zentiva brand. The roll out will continue in 2012 in the EU countries where Zentiva operates.
In Japan in 2011 we established a new joint venture, Sanofi Nichi-Iko K.K., to develop a strong presence in the fast-growing Japanese generics market: we started co-promotion for two molecules (edaravone in August 2011 and donepezil in October 2011). Scope of products to be co-promoted should be expanded in the future.
Sanofi Pasteur is a fully integrated vaccines division offering a broad range of vaccines. In 2011, Sanofi Pasteur provided more than 1 billion doses of vaccine, making it possible to immunize more than 500 million people across the globe against 20 serious diseases and generated net sales of 3,469 million. Sales were favorably impacted by strong growth in markets outside North America and Europe, continued growth of Pentaxim® sales and successful seasonal influenza vaccine campaigns in both the Northern and Southern hemispheres. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2010 Net Sales Human Vaccines (Vaccines).
Sanofi Pasteur is a world leader in the vaccine industry in terms of sales. In the United States, Sanofi Pasteur is the market leader in the segments where we compete (source: based on internal estimates).
In Europe, Sanofi Pasteur vaccine products are developed and marketed by Sanofi Pasteur MSD, a joint venture created in 1994 and held equally by Sanofi Pasteur and Merck & Co. Inc., which serves 19 countries. Sanofi Pasteur MSD also distributes such Merck & Co. vaccine products as Gardasil® in the joint ventures geographic scope. In 2011, Sanofi Pasteur MSD net sales, which are accounted for using the equity method, amounted to 791 million.
Sanofi Pasteur has been expanding in Asia (China, India and Japan), Latin America (Mexico and Brazil), Africa, the Middle-East and Eastern Europe. Sanofi Pasteur is very active in publicly-funded international markets such as UNICEF and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI).
The table below shows net sales of vaccines by product range:
Pediatric Combination and Poliomyelitis (Polio) Vaccines
These vaccines vary in composition due to diverse immunization schedules throughout the world.
Sanofi Pasteur is one of the key players in pediatric vaccines in both emerging and mature markets with a broad portfolio of standalone and combination vaccines protecting against up to five diseases in a single injection.
Pentacel®, a vaccine protecting against five diseases (pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b), was launched in the United States in 2008.
Pediacel®, a fully liquid acellular pertussis-based pentavalent vaccine, is the standard of care in the United Kingdom since 2004 for protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease. As of December 31, 2011, Pediacel® was approved in 29 countries across Europe in a new syringe presentation.
Pentaxim®, a combination vaccine protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b was first marketed in 1997 and was launched in China in May 2011. To date, more than 100 million doses of Pentaxim® have been distributed in over 100 countries, and the vaccine has been included in the national immunization programs in 23 countries.
Act-HIB®, for the prevention of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) infections, is also an important growth driver within the pediatric product line. In 2008, Act-HIB® became the first Hib vaccine to be approved in Japan.
HexaximTM, is a hexavalent pediatric vaccine providing protection against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis (polio), Haemophilus influenzae type b infections and hepatitis B. The vaccine is currently under the registration process (Article 58) at EMA, with an opinion expected in 2012.
PR5I is a combination vaccine designed to help protect against six potentially serious diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough (pertussis), polio (poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3), invasive disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B. This product is jointly being developed between Sanofi Pasteur and Merck in the U.S. and Europe. Phase III studies in the U.S. and Europe began in April 2011.
Sanofi Pasteur is one of the worlds leading developers and manufacturers of polio vaccines, both oral (OPV) and enhanced injectable (eIPV) form. The worldwide polio eradication initiative led by the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF has positioned Sanofi Pasteur as a global preferred partner with both OPV and eIPV vaccines.
In September of 2011, Sanofi Pasteur donated to the WHO a vaccine strain used for polio eradication. The biological material given by Sanofi Pasteur is the original viral seed used to produce large quantities of OPV against type 3 poliovirus. With this donation from Sanofi Pasteur, the WHO will be in full control of the storage of the vaccine strain and its distribution to vaccine producers worldwide.
Sanofi Pasteur is also supporting the introduction of eIPV in the international region. With recent progress towards polio eradication, Sanofi Pasteur expects the use of eIPV to gradually increase. As a result, Sanofi Pasteur is expanding its production capacity to meet the growing demand.
On February 23, 2011, Sanofi Pasteur applied for approval of manufacturing and marketing of standalone inactivated vaccine against polio (acute poliomyelitis) in Japan.
Shantha Biotechnics is currently pursuing requalification of Shan5®, a combination vaccine protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b with the WHO. Shantha has worked closely with Sanofi Pasteur to improve key manufacturing steps in the production of the antigen components of the vaccine. The path back to obtaining Prequalification status has been discussed extensively with the WHO and local Indian regulators. Based on the successful completion of clinical studies, Shan5® is expected to regain WHO prequalification in 2014.
Sanofi Pasteur is a world leader in the production and marketing of influenza vaccines. Sales of the influenza vaccines Fluzone® and Vaxigrip®/Mutagrip® have more than tripled since 1995 and annual supply reached more than 200 million doses in 2011 to better meet increasing demand. In recent years, influenza vaccine demand has experienced strong growth in many countries, particularly in the U.S., South Korea, Brazil and Mexico. Sanofi Pasteur expects the global demand for influenza vaccines to continue to grow within the next decade due to increased disease awareness, growth in emerging markets and wider government immunization recommendations.
Sanofi Pasteur remains focused on maintaining its leadership in the influenza market and on meeting the increasing demand for both pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccines through the launch of innovative vaccines.
In May 2011, Sanofi Pasteur received regulatory approval by the U.S. FDA for Fluzone® ID in adults from 18 to 64 years of age. The advantages of this vaccine are particularly its convenience and ease of administration. Fluzone ID®, Intanza®/IDflu® vaccine is now approved in the United States, European Union, Canada, Australia and other countries for the prevention of seasonal influenza in both adults (age 18 and over) and the elderly (age 60 and over).
In December 2009, the FDA approved Sanofi Pasteurs supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for licensing of Fluzone® High-Dose influenza virus vaccine. The Fluzone® High-Dose vaccine was specifically designed to generate a more robust immune response in people 65 years of age or older. This age group, which typically shows a weaker immune response, has proven to respond better to the Fluzone® High-Dose vaccine. This new vaccine was launched in the United States in 2010 and continued strong growth in 2011.
Fluzone® QIV candidate vaccine is a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing two antigens of type A (H1N1 and H3N2) and two antigens of type B (one each from Yamagata and Victoria lineage). Selecting the prevailing influenza strains for upcoming seasons is an incredibly difficult task. In the recent past, there have been a number of mismatches of the B strain component in the trivalent vaccine compared with the circulating B lineage. Sanofi Pasteur expects that increasing the number of strains in the vaccine will give increased protection against the most prevalent strains. The targeted population is the same as standard-dose Fluzone® TIV (trivalent vaccine): children 6 months through 17 years, and adults and elderly 18 years and above. A Phase III clinical trial was completed in 2011 for Fluzone QIV IM and regulatory submission is planned for the first half 2012. Vaxigrip QIV IM, targeting the European market, entered Phase III clinical trials in October 2011.
Adult and Adolescent Boosters
Pertussis (whooping cough) affects children, adolescents and adults. Resurgence, in particular in the State of California in the U.S. and other parts of the world in 2010, combined with increased awareness of the dangers of vaccine-preventable diseases in general, has led to higher sales of this product group in recent years. Adacel®, the first trivalent adolescent and adult booster against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, was licensed and launched in the United States in 2005. Since 2004, Adacel® has been the standard of care in Canada, where most provinces provide routine adolescent immunization. This vaccine plays an important role in efforts to better control pertussis, by preventing the disease in adolescents and adults, and by breaking the cycle of transmission to infants too young to be immunized or only partially vaccinated. Adacel® is now registered in more than 50 countries.
Quadracel®, a quadrivalent booster vaccine (fifth dose) including diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and IPV is being developed for the U.S. market. It would allow a child to complete the entire childhood series with the fewest doses possible. A Phase III clinical trial began in April 2011.
Meningitis and pneumonia vaccines
Sanofi Pasteur is at the forefront of the development of vaccines to prevent bacterial meningitis. In 2005, Sanofi Pasteur introduced Menactra®, the first conjugate quadrivalent vaccine against meningococcal meningitis, arguably the deadliest form of meningitis in the world. In October 2007, the FDA granted Sanofi Pasteur a license to expand the indication of Menactra® to children two years through 10 years of age. Menactra® is now indicated for people aged 2-55 years in the United States and in Canada. In 2011, sales of Menactra® continued to grow in the United States following the CDCs Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation that a single dose at 11 or 12 years of age be followed-up with a booster dose several years later for protecting adolescents at the time of their highest risk. An Infant/Toddler (age 9/12 months) biological license application for Menactra® was approved by the U.S. FDA in March 2011. Sanofi Pasteur also launched Menactra® in the Middle East and Latin America in 2010 and in Asia in 2011.
Meningitis A, C, Y, W-135 conj. Second Generation is a project that targets a second generation meningococcal vaccine that uses an alternative conjugation technology. In 2011, interim Phase II clinical trial results were obtained and indicated that the product is sufficiently immunogenic for further development in infants.
For over 30 years, Sanofi Pasteur has supplied vaccines for meningococcal meningitis serogroups A and C used to combat annual epidemics in Sub-Saharan countries (African meningitis belt).
Travel and Endemics Vaccines
Sanofi Pasteur provides a wide range of travelers and endemic vaccines with hepatitis A, typhoid, rabies, yellow fever, cholera measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccines and anti-venoms. These vaccines are used in
endemic settings in the developing world and are the basis for important partnerships with governments and organizations such as UNICEF. They are also used by the military and travelers to endemic areas. As the global leader in the majority of these vaccine markets, Sanofi Pasteurs Travel/Endemics activity has demonstrated stable growth.
A Japanese encephalitis vaccine is also in preparation. Japanese encephalitis is endemic in Southeast Asia. Sanofi Pasteur will offer a new vaccine in the market: IMOJEVTM. The Australian healthcare authorities granted approval of IMOJEVTM on August 16, 2010 for individuals aged 12 months and over. On October 29, 2010, the Thai Food and Drug Administration granted licensure in the same age indication.
The new generation Vero serum-free vaccine (VRVg) will provide a worldwide, single rabies vaccine as a replacement to our current rabies vaccine offerings. Results from the 2009 Phase I clinical trial demonstrated non-inferiority of VRVg versus Verorab®. AFSSAPS in France approved VRVg as a line extension of VeroRab in January 2011. Clinical development is continuing in China and India.
In December 2009, Shantha launched ShanCholTM, Indias first oral vaccine to protect against cholera in children and adults. In September 2011, ShancholTM was approved for procurement to United Nations Agencies (i.e. WHO Pre-qualified).
In October 2011, Sanofi Pasteur acquired Topaz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a small privately-held U.S. specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing treatments primarily for pediatric and dermatology markets. Established in June 2005 and based in Horsham PA, Topaz Pharmaceuticals offers a late-stage prescription product for the treatment of head lice. This investigational product, known as Sklice, Topical Lotion, is a formulation of Ivermectin. It is the sole pipeline product of the company. The regulatory submission for Sklice, topical Lotion, for treatment of head lice in children and adults, was filed with the U.S. FDA in April 2011. In February 2012, the FDA approved Sklice® (ivermectin) lotion, 0.5% for the topical treatment of head lice, in patients 6 months of age and older.
Animal Health: Merial
Our animal health activity is carried out through Merial, one of the worlds leading animal healthcare companies (source: Vetnosis), dedicated to the research, development, manufacture and delivery of innovative pharmaceuticals and vaccines used by veterinarians, farmers and pet owners. It provides a comprehensive range of products to enhance the health, well-being and performance of a wide range of animals (production and companion animals). Its net sales for 2011 amounted to 2,030 million.
Merial became Sanofis dedicated animal health division following the joint statement issued by Merck and Sanofi in March 2011 announcing the end of their agreement to create a new animal health joint venture by combining their respective animal health segments. Consequently all Merial financials are consolidated in Group reports. See Note D.2. to our consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report.
The animal health product range comprises four major segments: parasiticides, anti-infectious drugs, other pharmaceutical products (such as anti-inflammatory agents, anti-ulcerous agents, etc.) and vaccines. Merials top-selling products include Frontline®, a topical anti-parasitic flea and tick brand for dogs and cats, the highest selling veterinary product in the world (source: Vetnosis 2011); Heartgard®, a parasiticide for control of heartworm in companion animals; Ivomec®, a parasiticide for the control of internal and external parasites in livestock; Vaxxitek®, a high-technology vector vaccine, protects chickens against infectious bursal disease (IBD) and Mareks disease; Previcox®, a highly selective anti-inflammatory/COX-2 inhibitor for relief of pain and control of inflammation in dogs; Eprinex®, a parasiticide for use in cattle; and Circovac® a PCV2 (porcine circovirus type 2) vaccine for swine. Merial plays a key role in the veterinary public health activities of governments around the world. It is the world leader in vaccines for Foot-and-Mouth disease (FMD); rabies, and bluetongue (BTV) (source: Vetnosis 2011).
The compound patent protecting fipronil, the active ingredient of Frontline®, expired in 2009 in Japan and in some European countries, including France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, and in August 2010 in the United States. In those markets where the fipronil compound patent has expired, Frontline® products are generally still protected through formulation patents (directed to combinations) which expire at the latest in 2017
in Europe (August 2016 in the United States). Frontline® is also protected by a method of use patent in the United States and the European Patent area (Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom), expiring March 2018. As for human pharmaceutical products, patent protection for animal pharmaceutical products extends in most cases for 20 years from the filing date of the priority application.
As regards regulatory exclusivity, the position of veterinary medicinal products in Europe is similar to that of human pharmaceutical products: eight-year data exclusivity and ten-year market exclusivity. In the United States, there is ten-year data exclusivity for products approved by the Environmental Protection Agency and an additional five years during which a generic applicant has to compensate the originator if it cites the originators data. For FDA approved veterinary medicinal products, a regulatory exclusivity period of five years is granted for a new chemical entity and three years for a previously-approved active ingredient. No data exclusivity exists at present for veterinary vaccines in the United States.
Regarding companion animals and specially the fipronil franchise, on June 21, 2011 the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ruled in favor of Merial holding that sales of PetArmor Plus products infringed Merials patent, and it barred Cipla and Velcera from making or selling those products in the United States. A court-ordered seizure of the inventory in the United States still in possession of the generic manufacturers went into effect on August 21, 2011. However, the generic products already sold to retailers were not recalled (see Item 8. Financial Information A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information). In July 2011, Merial launched Certifect®, a new fipronil combination parasiticide for tick and flea control for dogs.
Regarding production animals, in the ruminant segment, performance was driven by the launch in the U.S. of the antibiotic Zactran® against bovine respiratory disease.
Merials major stand-alone markets are the United States, France, Brazil, Italy, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Japan, Spain, China, and Canada. The group of Emerging Markets countries, with double digit sales growth in 2011, accounts now for 25.0% of total Merial sales.
Merial operates through a network of 16 production sites, with major sites located in France, the United States, Brazil and China. The major R&D sites are located in France and in the United States. Merial employs approximately 5,600 employees worldwide.
Pharmaceutical Research & Development
The pharmaceutical industry as a whole has been facing significant challenges in the recent years.
To overcome this new situation, Sanofi has revised its overall infrastructure and operations footprint and opened up to external innovation and new fields of opportunity, so as to feed and strengthen its pipeline. We have adopted a network-based organization, open to external opportunities, to enable our R&D to be more creative and make the most of both in-house and external innovation. In December 2011, out of 48 products in clinical development or registration, 34 (or 71%) originate from external R&D. Employee year-end headcount in the research and development functions generally reflects this trend to greater externalization, and amounted to 18,823 for 2011 compared to 16,983 for 2010 and 19,132 for 2009 (in each case excluding Merial but including Genzyme in 2011 - 2,006 employees).
We intend to have the most effective R&D organization in the pharmaceutical industry in place by 2013. The new R&D approach aims to foster greater creativity and innovation. Streamlined organizational structures are designed to make R&D more flexible and entrepreneurial and hence better adapted to overcome future challenges.
During the first phase of transformation (2009-2011) we carried out a rigorous and deep re-evaluation of all current development programs. As a result, we have refocused our efforts on 48 clinical programs (see table below).
In parallel we undertook a profound transformation of our operating model reinforcing our patient centric approach and setting an open innovation strategy.
During 2011, R&D followed up the rigorous and comprehensive portfolio review already initiated in 2009. Projects were assessed using seven key criteria which allow management to rapidly understand how the portfolio performs in terms of innovation, unmet medical needs, risk and value. They can be summarized as follows:
At the end of 2011, the current clinical portfolio is the result of decisions taken during these reviews, plus compounds entering the portfolio from the discovery phase or from third parties through acquisition, collaboration or alliances.
As described at Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business We may fail to adequately renew our product portfolio whether through our own research and development or through acquisitions and strategic alliances. our product development efforts are subject to the risks and uncertainties inherent in any new product development program.
The clinical portfolio for new medical entities can be summarized as follows:
Phase I studies are the first studies performed in humans, in healthy volunteers. Their main objective is to assess the tolerability, the pharmacokinetic profile (the way the product is distributed and metabolized in the body and the manner by which it is eliminated) and where possible the pharmacodynamic profiles of the new drug. (how the product may react on some receptors)
Phase II studies are early controlled studies in a limited number of patients under closely monitored conditions to show efficacy and short-term safety and to determine the dose and regimen for Phase III studies.
Phase III studies have the primary objective of demonstrating or confirming the therapeutic benefit and the safety of the new drug, in the intended indication and population. They are made to provide an adequate basis for registration.
The Phase II & III compounds are described in the section Pharmaceutical Products Main Pharmaceutical Products above. A table summarizing selected key facts concerning our late stage experimental pharmaceutical products follows, at the end of this section.
The remainder of this section focuses on Phase I compounds entries, and lists projects that were terminated in 2011.
Diabetes/Other Metabolic Disorders portfolio
A number of compounds for the treatment of eye disease were added to the portfolio via the acquisition of Fovea, the collaboration agreement with Oxford BioMedica and the acquisition of Genzyme (see Pharmaceutical Products Main Pharmaceutical Products Other Pharmaceutical Products above).
In gene therapy, three compounds targeting the treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and Stargardt Disease entered into Phase I in 2011
TSU Aging portfolio
For Discovery/development partnerships:
TSU Infectious Diseases portfolio
TSU Immuno-Inflammation portfolio
Other Projects portfolio
R&D expenditures for late stage development
Expenditures on research and development amounted to 4,811 million in 2011, of which 4,101 million in the pharmaceutical segment, 564 million in Human Vaccines and 146 million in Animal Health. Research and development expenditures were the equivalent of about 14.4% of net sales in 2011, compared to about 14.1% in 2010 and 15.5% in 2009. The discontinuation of a number of projects contributed to the decrease in such expenditure in 2009 and 2010 and going forward the level of expenditure can be expected to continue to vary as a reflection of the number of products in late stage development among other factors. Preclinical research in the pharmaceutical segment amounted to 1,113 million in 2011, compared to 1,037 million in 2010 and 1,047 million in 2009. Of the remaining 2,988 million relating to clinical development in the pharmaceutical sector (2,848 million in 2010 and 3,043 million in 2009), the largest portion was generated by Phase III or post-marketing studies reflecting the cost of monitoring large scale clinical trials.
For each of our current late stage (Phase III) compounds in the Pharmaceutical segment, we set out below the date at which this compound entered into Phase III development, information concerning any compound patent in the principal markets for innovative pharmaceutical products (the United States, European Union and Japan) as well as comments regarding significant future milestones that are reasonably determinable at this date. Because the timing of such milestones typically depends on a number of factors outside of our control (such as the time to validate study protocols, recruit subjects, the speed with which endpoints are realized, as well as the substantial time taken by regulatory review) it is frequently not possible to provide such estimates, and any such estimates as are given should be understood to be indicative only. See also Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business.
With respect to the compound patent information set out above, investors should bear the following additional factors in mind.
Vaccines Research and Development
Our human vaccine research and development (R&D) remains focused on improving existing vaccines, as well as on the development of new prophylactic vaccines.
The Sanofi Pasteur R&D portfolio includes 13 vaccines currently in advanced development as shown in the table below. The portfolio includes five vaccines/antibody products for novel targets and eight vaccines which are enhancements of existing vaccine products.
This section focuses on Phase I compounds and novel targets. Other vaccines in Phase II or III are described in the section Vaccine Products above.
To sustain our global leadership in the development of influenza vaccine, our R&D efforts are focused on innovative approaches for assessing new formulations and alternative delivery systems (see Vaccine Products).
Pediatric Combination & Adolescent/Adult Boosters
Several pediatric vaccines are under development. Tailored for specific markets, they are aimed at protecting against five or all six of the following diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis (polio), Haemophilus influenzae type b infections and hepatitis B (see Vaccine Products).
Neisseria meningitidis bacteria is a leading cause of meningitis in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, affecting infants and children as well as adolescents. The primary focus of several ongoing projects related to Menactra® is to decrease the age at which this vaccine can first be administered. (see Vaccine Products).
Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria is the leading etiological agent causing severe infections such as pneumonia, septicemia, meningitis and otitis media, and is responsible for over three million deaths per year worldwide, of which one million are children. Anti-microbial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae has complicated the treatment of pneumococcal disease and further emphasized the need for vaccination to prevent large-scale morbidity and mortality.
Sanofi Pasteur is focused on the development of a multi-protein-based pneumococcal vaccine. This approach should result in a vaccine with superior serotype coverage as compared to current polysaccharide or conjugate based vaccines and should not induce nor be sensitive to serotype replacement. Results from the first Phase I clinical trial of a bi-component formulation demonstrated safety and immunogenicity. Results from a second Phase I clinical trial to evaluate a third antigen also demonstrated safety and immunogenicity (ability to induce an immune response). A third Phase I clinical trial of a tri-component formulation began in September 2011 in adults, adolescents, and infants in Bangladesh.
Rabies mAb Post Exposure Prophylaxis This product consists of two rabies monoclonal antibodies (MABs) that will be used in association with the rabies vaccine for post-exposure prophylaxis. The last Phase II clinical trial in India was initiated in November 2011. In 2011, Sanofi Pasteur reviewed the rabies mAb project, developed in partnership with Crucell. Crucell, acquired by Johnson & Johnson, will take over full responsibility for the development of the product and Sanofi Pasteur will market it, when the vaccine is available.
New Vaccine Targets
Dengue Dengue fever has increasing epidemiological importance due to global socio-climatic changes. It is a major medical and economic burden in the endemic areas of Asia-Pacific, Latin America and Africa. It is also one of the leading causes of fever among travelers. Multiple approaches have been tested to develop a vaccine covering the four viral serotypes of dengue fever in order to prevent this disease and its severe complications (hemorrhagic fever). Results of a Phase II clinical trial in adults in the United States demonstrated proof of concept of the lead quadrivalent vaccine candidate. Sanofi Pasteurs dengue vaccine research program includes ongoing clinical studies (adults and children) in several countries in endemic regions. The first Phase III study was initiated in October 2010 in Australia. This final stage of clinical development aims at demonstrating that production of the vaccine on an industrial scale will meet the consistency criteria required for market authorizations. The study in Australia is the first to use our dengue vaccine doses produced on an industrial scale. Two Phase III studies to evaluate efficacy (Latin America and Asia Pacific) began in June 2011. In February 2011, Sanofi Pasteur announced that it was partnering with the International Vaccine Institute (IVI) to support the recently launched Dengue Vaccine Initiative (DVI) in collaboration with the Sabin Vaccine Institute, the Johns Hopkins University, and the WHO to support development of vaccines to control dengue fever.
Tuberculosis Statens Serum Institute of Denmark (SSI) has granted Sanofi Pasteur a license to its technology with regard to the use of certain fusion proteins in the development of a tuberculosis vaccine. The license from SSI includes access to the Intercell IC31® adjuvant. The candidate vaccine is made up of recombinant protein units. Results from the 2008 Phase I trial found that the H4/IC31 candidate was safe when administered to healthy adults living in a region of high endemic tuberculosis. Rapid and poly-functional antigen-specific T cell responses were induced following a single dose of the investigational vaccine. A second Phase I trial was initiated in Switzerland in December 2010, with full enrollment completed in June 2011.
HIV A follow-up study to the Phase III clinical trial in Thailand provided new clues in 2011 about the types of immune responses that may have played a role in the protection seen in 2009 with our ALVAC-HIV vaccine. Last year, Sanofi Pasteur entered into a public-private partnership with Novartis Vaccines, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), the HIV Vaccine Trial Network, and the Military HIV Research Program to substantiate and extend the vector prime/protein subunit boost regimen used in Thailand. Plans are being made to also study the regimen in the Republic of South Africa. This collaboration is expected to further the field of HIV vaccine development by sharing resources and by providing the manufacturing component of a partnership of funding agencies, research organizations, governments, and experts in the field of HIV vaccine development. Sanofi Pasteur is also looking at its NYVAC-HIV vaccine replicating vectors by participating in the Pox-T-cell consortium and the IPPOX Foundation in the Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery (CAVD).
ACAM-Cdiff Clostridium difficile is a major public health concern in North America and Europe. In hospitals, it is the leading cause of infectious diarrhea in adults, particularly the elderly. The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile associated disease (CDAD) has been increasing at an alarming rate since 2003, driven
primarily by the emergence of a treatment-resistant, highly virulent strain CD027. There is currently no vaccine available and the only vaccine candidate currently in development is ACAM-Cdiff. ACAM-Cdiff is a toxoid-based vaccine. Toxoids have been used as the basis of a number of highly successful licensed vaccines. This vaccine candidate has successfully completed Phase I clinical trials with more than 200 participants in which safety and immunogenicity were evaluated. Sanofi Pasteur received a positive response from the United States. FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research (CBER) on the Fast Track Development Program submission in 2010. In November 2010, our Clostridium difficile vaccine started Phase II of clinical study in the U.S. This trial is focused on evaluating prevention of the first episode of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in at-risk individuals, which includes adults with imminent hospitalization or current or impending residence in a long-term care or rehabilitation facility. Results from the first stage of this study showed the vaccine was safe and immunogenic and provided important information for dose selection. The ongoing stage 2 of the study is evaluating the dosing schedule.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa In February 2010, Sanofi Pasteur entered into an agreement with KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, a U.S.-based, privately held biotech company, for the development of a Humaneered antibody fragment to both treat and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infections. Most serious Pa infections occur in hospitalized and critically or chronically ill patients primarily affecting the respiratory system in susceptible individuals and are a serious clinical problem due to their resistance to antibiotics. The two primary target indications for the antibody are prevention of Pa associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients in hospitals, and prevention of relapses and potential improvement of treatment outcomes in patients with an ongoing Pa infection. Under the terms of the agreement, Sanofi Pasteur acquired worldwide rights for all disease indications related to Pa infections except cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis, which Sanofi Pasteur has the option to obtain at a later date. KaloBios has already completed Phase I clinical trials one in healthy volunteers and one in cystic fibrosis patients and a small proof of concept Phase II clinical trial in mechanically ventilated patients.
Rotavirus Rotavirus is the leading cause of severe, dehydrating diarrhea in children aged under five globally. Estimates suggest that rotavirus causes over 25 million outpatient visits, over 2 million hospitalizations and over 500,000 deaths per year. The burden of severe rotavirus illness and deaths falls heavily upon children in the poorer countries of the world, with more than 80% of rotavirus-related deaths estimated to occur in lower income countries of Asia, and in sub-Saharan Africa. Two vaccines (RotaTeq® and Rotarix®) are licensed worldwide, but production of local vaccines is necessary to achieve wide coverage. Shantha has a non-exclusive license of rotavirus strains from the U.S. NIH and is developing a live-attenuated human bovine (G1-G4) reassortant vaccine. The license excludes Europe, Canada, United States, China and Brazil. The project is currently in Phase I.
Patents, Intellectual Property and Other Rights
We own a broad portfolio of patents, patent applications and patent licenses worldwide. These patents are of various types and may cover:
Patent protection for individual products typically extends for 20 years from the patent filing date in countries where we seek patent protection. A substantial part of the 20-year life span of a patent on a new chemical entity has generally already passed by the time the related product obtains marketing approval. As a
result, the effective period of patent protection for an approved products active ingredient is significantly shorter than 20 years. In some cases, the period of effective protection may be extended by procedures established to compensate significant regulatory delay in Europe (a Supplementary Protection Certificate or SPC), the United States (a Patent Term Extension or PTE) and Japan (also a PTE).
Additionally, the product may benefit from the protection of patents obtained during development or after the products initial marketing approval. The protection a patent affords the related product depends upon the type of patent and its scope of coverage, and may also vary from country to country. In Europe for instance, applications for new patents may be submitted to the European Patent Office (EPO), an intergovernmental organization which centralizes filing and prosecution. As of December 2011, an EPO patent application may cover the 38 European Patent Convention member states, including all 27 member states of the European Union. The granted European Patent establishes corresponding national patents with uniform patent claims among the member states. However, some older patents were not approved through this centralized process, resulting in patents having claim terms for the same invention that differ by country. Additionally, a number of patents prosecuted through the EPO may pre-date the European Patent Convention accession of some current European Patent Convention member states, resulting in different treatment in those countries.
We monitor our competitors and vigorously seek to challenge patent infringement when such challenges would negatively impact our business objectives. See Item 8 - A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information Patents of this annual report.
The expiration or loss of an active ingredient patent may result in significant competition from generic products and can result in a dramatic reduction in sales of the original branded product. See Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Generic versions of some of our products may be approved for sale in one or more of their major markets; and We may lose market share to competing remedies or generic brands if they are perceived to be equivalent or superior products. In some cases, it is possible to continue to obtain commercial benefits from product manufacturing trade secrets or from other types of patents, such as patents on processes, intermediates, structure, formulations, methods of treatment, indications or delivery systems. Certain categories of products, such as traditional vaccines and insulin, have been historically relatively less reliant on patent protection and may in many cases have no patent coverage, although it is increasingly frequent for novel vaccines and insulins to be patent protected. See Focus on Biologics below. Patent protection is also an important factor in our animal health business, but is of comparatively lesser importance to our Consumer Health Care and generics businesses, which rely principally on trademark protection.
In some markets, including the European Union and the United States, many of our pharmaceutical products may also benefit from multi-year regulatory exclusivity periods, during which a generic competitor may not rely on our clinical trial and safety data in its drug application. Exclusivity is meant to encourage investment in research and development by providing innovators the exclusive use for a limited time of the innovation represented by a newly approved drug product. This exclusivity operates independently of patent protection and may protect the product from generic competition even if there is no patent covering the product.
In the United States, the FDA will not grant final marketing approval to a generic competitor for a New Chemical Entity (NCE) until the expiration of the regulatory exclusivity period (generally five years) that commences upon the first marketing authorization of the reference product. The FDA will accept the filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) containing a patent challenge one year before the end of this regulatory exclusivity period (see the descriptions of ANDAs in Product Overview Challenges to Patented Products below). In addition to the regulatory exclusivity granted to NCEs, significant line extensions of existing NCEs may qualify for an additional three years of regulatory exclusivity. Also, under certain limited conditions, it is possible to extend unexpired U.S. regulatory and patent-related exclusivities by a pediatric extension. See Pediatric Extension, below.
Further, in the United States, a different regulatory exclusivity period applies to biological drugs. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA), was enacted on March 23, 2010 as part of the much larger health care reform legislation known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(PPACA). The BPCIA introduced an approval pathway for biosimilar products. A biosimilar product is a biologic product that is highly similar to the reference (or innovator) product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and which has no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product in terms of the safety, purity, and potency of the product. The BPCIA provides that an application for a biosimilar product that relies on a reference product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years after the date on which the reference product was first licensed, and that the FDA may not approve a biosimilar application until twelve years after the date on which the reference product was first licensed.
In the European Union, regulatory exclusivity is available in two forms: data exclusivity and marketing exclusivity. Generic drug applications will not be accepted for review until eight years after the first marketing authorization (data exclusivity). This eight-year period is followed by a two-year period during which generics cannot be marketed (marketing exclusivity). The marketing exclusivity period can be extended to three years if, during the first eight-year period, the marketing authorization holder obtains an authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications which are deemed to provide a significant clinical benefit over existing therapies. This is known as the 8+2+1 rule.
In Japan, the regulatory exclusivity period varies from four years (for medicinal products with new indications, formulations, dosages, or compositions with related prescriptions) to six years (for new drugs containing a medicinal composition, or requiring a new route of administration) to eight years (for drugs containing a new chemical entity) to ten years (for orphan drugs or new drugs requiring pharmaco-epidemiological study).
One of the main limitations on our operations in emerging market countries is the lack of effective intellectual property protection or enforcement for our products. The World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIP) has required developing countries to amend their intellectual property laws to provide patent protection for pharmaceutical products since January 1, 2005, although it provides a limited number of developing countries an extension to 2016. Additionally, these same countries frequently do not provide non-patent exclusivity for innovative products. While the situation has gradually improved, the lack of protection for intellectual property rights or the lack of robust enforcement of intellectual property rights poses difficulties in certain countries. Additionally, in recent years a number of countries facing health crises have waived or threatened to waive intellectual property protection for specific products, for example through compulsory licensing. See Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business The globalization of the Groups business exposes us to increased risks.
In the United States and Europe, under certain conditions, it is possible to extend a products regulatory exclusivities for an additional period of time by providing data regarding pediatric studies.
In the United States, the FDA may ask a company for pediatric studies if it has determined that information related to the use of the drugs in the pediatric population may produce health benefits. The FDA has invited us by written request to provide additional pediatric data on several of our main products. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, timely provision of data meeting the FDAs requirements (regardless of whether the data supports a pediatric indication) may result in the FDA extending regulatory exclusivity and patent life by six months, to the extent these protections have not already expired (the so-called pediatric exclusivity). Our main products which have received FDA grants of pediatric exclusivity at some point are Aprovel®, Lantus®, Allegra®, Ambien®/Ambien® CR, Plavix® Taxotere®, and Actonel®.
In Europe, a regulation on pediatric medicines provides for pediatric research obligations with potential associated rewards including extension of patent protection (for patented medicinal products) and regulatory exclusivity for pediatric marketing authorization (for off-patent medicinal products).
Orphan Drug Exclusivity
Orphan drug exclusivity may be granted in the United States to drugs intended to treat rare diseases or conditions (affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the U.S. or in some cases more than 200,000 with no expectation of recovering costs).
Obtaining orphan drug exclusivity is a two-step process. An applicant must first seek and obtain orphan drug designation from the FDA for its drug. If the FDA approves the drug for the designated indication, the drug will receive orphan drug exclusivity.
Orphan drug exclusivity runs from the time of approval and bars approval of another application (ANDA, 505(b)(2), New Drug Application (NDA) or Biologic License Application (BLA)) from a different sponsor for the same drug in the same indication for a seven-year period. Whether a subsequent application is for the same drug depends upon the chemical and clinical characteristics. The FDA may approve applications for the same drug for indications not protected by orphan exclusivity.
Orphan drug exclusivities also exist in the European Union and Japan.
We summarize below the intellectual property coverage in our major markets of the marketed products described above at Pharmaceutical Products Main Pharmaceutical Products. Concerning animal health products, Merials intellectual property coverage is described above (see Animal Health: Merial). In the discussion of patents below, we focus on active ingredient patents (compound patents) and any later filed improvement patents listed, as applicable, in the FDAs list of Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the Orange Book) or on their foreign equivalents. These patents tend to be the most relevant in the event of an application by a competitor to produce a generic version of one of our products or the equivalent of these patents in other countries (see Challenges to Patented Products below). In some cases, products may also benefit from pending patent applications or from patents not eligible for Orange Book listing (e.g., patents claiming industrial processes). In each case below, we specify whether the active ingredient is claimed by an unexpired patent. Where patent terms have been extended to compensate for regulatory delay, the extended dates are presented below. U.S. patent expirations presented below reflect U.S. Patent and Trademark Office dates, and therefore do not reflect six-month pediatric extensions to the FDAs Orange Book dates for the products concerned (Aprovel®, Lantus®, Plavix®, and Actonel®).
We do not provide later filed improvement patent information relating to formulations already available as an unlicensed generic. References below to patent protection in Europe indicate the existence of relevant patents in most major markets in the European Union. Specific situations may vary by country, most notably with respect to older patents and to countries having only recently joined the European Union.
We additionally set out any regulatory exclusivity from which these products continue to benefit in the United States, European Union or Japan. Regulatory exclusivities presented below incorporate any pediatric extensions obtained. While EU regulatory exclusivity is intended to be applied throughout the European Union, in some cases member states have taken positions prejudicial to our exclusivity rights. See Regulatory Exclusivity above.
Patents held or licensed by the Group do not in all cases provide effective protection against a competitors generic version of our products. For example, notwithstanding the presence of unexpired patents, competitors have launched generic versions of Eloxatin® in Europe, Allegra® in the United States (prior to the product being switched to over-the-counter status) and Plavix® in Europe.
We caution the reader that there can be no assurance that we will prevail when we assert a patent in litigation and that there may be instances in which the Group determines that it does not have a sufficient basis to assert one or more of the patents mentioned in this report, for example in cases where a competitor proposes a formulation not appearing to fall within the claims of our formulation patent, a salt or crystalline form not claimed by our composition of matter patent, or an indication not covered by our method of use patent. See Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Legal Matters We rely on our patents and proprietary rights to provide exclusive rights to market certain of our products, and if such patents and other rights were limited or circumvented, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
As disclosed in Item 8 of this annual report, we are involved in significant litigation concerning the patent protection of a number of our products.
Challenges to Patented Products
In the United States, companies have filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs), containing challenges to patents related to a number of our products. An ANDA is an application by a drug manufacturer to receive authority to market a generic version of another companys approved product, by demonstrating that the purportedly generic version has the same properties as the original approved product. ANDAs may not be filed with respect to drugs licensed as a biological. See Focus on Biologics below. An ANDA relies on the safety and other technical data of the original approved product, and does not generally require the generic manufacturer to conduct clinical trials (thus the name abbreviated new drug application), presenting a significant benefit in terms of time and cost. As a result of regulatory protection of our safety and other technical data, the ANDA may generally be filed only five years following the initial U.S. marketing authorization of the original product. See Regulatory Exclusivity above. This period can be reduced to four years if the ANDA includes a challenge to a patent listed in the FDAs Orange Book. However, in such a case if the patent holder or licensee brings suit in response to the patent challenge within the statutory window, then the FDA is barred from granting final approval to an ANDA during the 30 months following the patent challenge (this bar is referred to in our industry as a 30-month stay), unless, before the end of the 30 months, a court decision or settlement has determined either that the ANDA does not infringe the listed patent or that the listed patent is invalid and/or unenforceable.
FDA approval of an ANDA after this 30-month period does not resolve outstanding patent disputes, but it does remove the regulatory impediments to a product launch by a generic manufacturer willing to take the risk of later being ordered to pay damages to the patent holder.
Procedures comparable to the ANDA exist in other major markets.
In the European Union, a generic drug manufacturer may only reference the data of the regulatory file for the original approved product after data exclusivity has expired. However, there is no patent listing system in Europe comparable to the Orange Book, which would allow the patent holder to prevent the competent authorities from granting marketing approval by bringing patent infringement litigation prior to approval. As a result, generic products may be approved for marketing following the expiration of marketing exclusivity without regard to the patent holders rights. Nevertheless, in most of these jurisdictions once the competing product is launched and in some jurisdictions, even prior to launch (once launch is imminent), the patent holder may seek an injunction against such marketing if it believes its patents are infringed. See Item 8 of this annual report.
The accelerated ANDA-type procedures are potentially applicable to many, but not all, of the products we manufacture. See Focus on Biologics and Regulation below. We seek to defend our patent rights vigorously in these cases. Success or failure in the assertion of a given patent against a competing product is not necessarily predictive of the future success or failure in the assertion of the same patent - or a fortiori the corresponding foreign patent against another competing product due to factors such as possible differences in the formulations of the competing products, intervening developments in law or jurisprudence, local variations in the patents and differences in national patent law and legal systems. See Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Legal Matters We rely on our patents and proprietary rights to provide exclusive rights to market certain of our products, and if such patents and other rights were limited or circumvented, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
Our products are sold around the world under trademarks that we consider to be of material importance in the aggregate. Our trademarks help to identify our products and to protect the sustainability of our growth. Trademarks are particularly important to the commercial success of our CHC, generics and retail animal health business.
It is our policy to protect and register our trademarks with a strategy adapted to each product or service depending on their countries of commercialization: i.e., on a worldwide basis for worldwide products or services, or on a regional or local basis for regional or local products or services.
The process and degree of trademark protection vary country by country, as each country applies its own trademark laws and regulations. In most countries, trademark rights may only be obtained through formal trademark application and registration. In some countries, trademark protection can be based primarily on use. Registrations are granted for a fixed term (in most cases ten years) and are renewable indefinitely, except in some countries where maintenance of the trademarks is subject to their effective use.
When trademark protection is based on use, it covers the products and services for which the trademark is used. When trademark protection is based on registration, it covers only the products and services designated in the registration certificate. Additionally, in certain cases, we may enter into a coexistence agreement with a third-party that owns potentially conflicting rights in order to better protect and defend our trademarks.
Our trademarks are monitored and defended based on this policy and in order to prevent counterfeit, infringement and/ or unfair competition.
Production and Raw Materials
For many years, we have chosen to integrate the manufacture of our products in order to have better control of quality and distribution. Our manufacturing process consists of three principal stages: the manufacture of active pharmaceutical ingredients, the transformation of these ingredients into products, and packaging.
We have a general policy of producing our main active ingredients and principal products at our own plants in order to minimize our dependence on external manufacturers and ensure the strict and precise control of the product throughout the production cycle. In some cases however, we rely on third parties for the manufacture and supply of some active ingredients and medical devices. We also have outsourced certain production elements, particularly as part of supply framework agreements entered into within the context of plant divestitures, or in order to adapt locally to market growth in emerging markets. In particular, we outsource a part of the production of the active ingredients used in Stilnox® and Xatral®, and certain pharmaceutical product formulations. Our main pharmaceutical subcontractors are Famar, Haupt, Patheon, Catalent and Sofarimex. These subcontractors follow our general quality and logistics policies, as well as meeting other criteria. See section 3.D. Risk factors Risks Relating to Our Business.
We also depend on third parties for the manufacture of certain products. Under our partnership with BMS, a multi-vendor supply and safety stock have been put in place for Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate) and Aprovel® (irbesartan).
Our pharmaceutical production sites are divided into three categories:
Sanofi Pasteur produces vaccines at sites located in North America, France, China, Thailand, Argentina and India. Le Trait (France) and Anagni (Italy) pharmaceutical sites form part of Sanofi Pasteurs industrial operations and carry out aseptic filling and freeze-drying activities. A new antigen production unit in Mexico for seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines is scheduled to commence commercial production in 2012, once the necessary production and marketing approvals have been obtained from the Mexican authorities.
In 2011, our industrial operations diversified into rare diseases with the acquisition of Genzyme and the integration of Merial, Sanofis dedicated animal health division.
Genzymes activities throughout the world cover all biomedicine development stages, from initial research to clinical trials, regulatory matters, manufacture and marketing.
Merial markets pharmaceutical products (Frontline®, Heartgard®, Zactran®, Previcox®) and a broad range of vaccines for different animal species (dogs, cats, horses, ruminants, pigs and fowl). A number of pharmaceutical products are subcontracted (Heartgard®, Eprinex®) but almost all veterinary vaccines are manufactured at its own plants. Merials industrial operations dedicated to animal health cover all activities, from the purchase of raw materials through to the delivery of the finished products, ensuring its customers needs can be met through a reliable and flexible offer that meets quality expectations. There are sixteen production sites spread across nine countries.
All of our pharmaceutical and vaccine facilities are Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) compliant with international guidelines. Our principal sites are approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA): this includes our pharmaceutical facilities in Ambarès, Tours, Le Trait, Maisons-Alfort and Compiègne in France, Dagenham and Holmes Chapel in the United Kingdom, Frankfurt in Germany, Veresegyhaz in Hungary and Saint Louis in the United States, as well as our vaccine facilities in Marcy lEtoile and Val de Reuil (our worldwide distribution site) in France, Swiftwater in the United States and Toronto in Canada. The Genzyme facilities in the United States (Allston, Framingham, Ridgefield, Cambridge) and in Europe (Geel, Lyon, Haverhill and Waterford) are all FDA approved. Our animal health facilities in Athens, Gainesville, Berlin and Raleigh in the United States are managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Wherever possible, we seek to have multiple plants approved for the production of key active ingredients and our strategic finished products. This is the case of Lovenox®, for example.
In February 2011, we had received an FDA warning letter concerning our Frankfurt facility following a routine FDA inspection in September 2010. The warning letter cited GMP compliance issues in certain manufacturing processes, without referring to specific products. While believing that the points raised in the letter did not compromise the quality of our marketed products, we acted on this warning and worked towards satisfying the recommendations through a compliance first improvement action plan. In October 2011, we notified the FDA of the end of this program. We expect the FDA inspection to take place during the second quarter of 2012.
On May 24, 2010, Genzyme entered into a consent decree with the FDA relating to the Allston facility following FDA inspections at the Allston facility that resulted in 483 observations and a warning letter raising CGMP deficiencies. A consent decree is a court order entered by agreement between a company and the government (in this case the FDA) that requires the company to take certain actions as set out in the decree. Under the terms of Genzymes consent decree, Genzyme paid an upfront disgorgement of past profits of $175.0 million. Conditioned upon Genzymes compliance with the terms of the consent decree, Genzyme is permitted to continue manufacturing at the site during the remediation process.
The consent decree requires Genzyme to implement a plan to bring the Allston facility operations into compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The plan must address any deficiencies previously reported to Genzyme or identified as part of a comprehensive inspection that was completed by a third-party expert in February 2011. This third party expert has been retained by Genzyme and will monitor and oversee the implementation of the remediation workplan. The required comprehensive remediation workplan was submitted to the FDA in April 2011 and accepted by the FDA in January 2012. The workplan is expected to take approximately four more years to complete. The workplan includes a timetable of specified remediation compliance milestones. If the milestones are not met in accordance with the timetable, the FDA can require us to pay $15,000 per day, per affected drug, until these compliance milestones are met. Upon satisfying all compliance requirements in accordance with the terms of the consent decree, Genzyme will be required to retain an auditor to monitor and oversee ongoing compliance at the Allston facility for an additional five years. To date, all requirements of the consent decree, including all requirements of the workplan, have been met by Genzyme.
Genzyme will be meeting with the FDA to propose modifications to the workplan as a result of planned changes in manufacturing operations regarding Cerezyme® and Fabrazyme® for the Allston Landing Facility.
The new Genzyme Framingham (U.S.) facility was approved by the FDA and the EMA in January 2012 for the production of Fabrazyme® (agalsidase beta).
The Merial animal health facilities are regulated by different authorities depending on the product and the country (EPA, FDA, USDA, EU GMP, local authorities).
More details about our manufacturing sites are found below at Property, Plant and Equipment.
Health, Safety and Environment (HSE)
The manufacturing and research operations of Sanofi are subject to increasingly stringent health, safety and environmental (HSE) laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are complex and rapidly changing, and Sanofi invests the necessary sums in order to comply with them. This investment, which aims to respect health, safety and the environment, varies from year to year and totaled approximately 105 million in 2011.
The applicable environmental laws and regulations may require Sanofi to eradicate or reduce the effects of chemical substance usage and release at its various sites. The sites in question may belong to the Group, be currently operational, or they may have been owned or operational in the past. Under some of these laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of a property may be held liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances on, under or in its property, or transported from its property to third party sites, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or under certain circumstances caused the presence of the contaminants, or at the time site operations occurred, the discharge of those substances was authorized.
Moreover, as is the case for a number of companies involved in the pharmaceutical, chemical and agrochemical industries, soil and groundwater contamination has occurred at some Group sites in the past, and may still occur or be discovered at others. In the Groups case, such sites are mainly located in the United States, Germany, France, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Brazil, Italy and the United Kingdom. As part of a program of environmental audits conducted over the last few years, detailed assessments of the risk of soil and groundwater contamination have been carried out at current and former Group sites. In cooperation with national and local authorities, the Group regularly assesses the rehabilitation work required and carries out such work when appropriate. Long-term rehabilitation work is in progress or planed in Rochester, Cincinnati, Mount-Pleasant, East Palo Alto, Ambler and Portland in the United States; Frankfurt in Germany; Beaucaire, Valernes, Limay, Rousset, Romainville, Neuville, Vitry and Toulouse in France; Dagenham in the United Kingdom; Brindisi and Garessio in Italy; Ujpest in Hungary; Hlohovec in Slovakia; Prague in the Czech Republic; and on a number of sites divested to third parties and covered by contractual environmental guarantees granted by Sanofi. Sanofi may also have potential liability for investigation and cleanup at several other sites.
Provisions have been established for the sites already identified and to cover contractual guarantees for environmental liabilities for sites that have been divested. For example, in 2007 the State of New Jersey initiated a claim against Bayer CropScience seeking compensation for damages caused to natural resources (NRD) at a former Rhône-Poulenc site in the United States, resulting in indemnification claims by Bayer CropScience against the Group under contractual environmental guarantees granted at the time of Bayers acquisition of the CropScience business. Rehabilitation studies and an NRD assessment are underway in a similar project in Portland, Oregon. Potential environmental contingencies arising from certain business divestitures are described in Note D.22.e) to the consolidated financial statements included at Item 18 of this annual report. In 2011, Sanofi spent 41 million on rehabilitating sites previously contaminated by soil or groundwater pollution. During the year ended December 31, 2011, a comprehensive review was carried out relating to the legacy of environmental pollution. In light of data collected during this review, the Group adjusted the provisions to approximately 763 million as at December 31, 2011; this figure includes the provisions related to Genzyme.
Due to changes in environmental regulations governing site remediation, the Groups provisions for remediation obligations may not be adequate due to the multiple factors involved, such as the complexity of operational or previously operational sites, the nature of claims received, the rehabilitation techniques considered, the planned timetable for rehabilitation, and the outcome of discussions with national regulatory authorities or other potentially responsible parties, as in the case of multiparty sites. Given the long industrial history of som