




|
Topic
Top news source/blog that we're missing
Why do you recommend this news source?
|
||

WIKI ANALYSIS
|
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (NYSE:SMG) is North America's leading producer of lawn care and gardening products. The company offers brands such as Miracle-Gro, Roundup, and Weed-B-Gon.
In North America, Scotts has a greater than 50% market share, by sales, in all but one of the product areas in which it participates.[1] In addition to control over market share, Scotts spends approximately five percent of its revenues on advertising, making their brands highly recognizable to consumers. In fiscal 2007, Scotts spent $150.9 million in advertising expenses, which was a far greater sum than its competitors. [2] Spectrum's products, not only for its gardening category, with which Scotts competes. [3] Scotts is also well known for its close relationships with leading retailers; In FY 2007, 60% of its sales came from just 3 sources. These were Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) (15%), Home Depot (HD) (29%), and Lowe's(16%).[4]
Scotts also faces challenges common to all companies in the agricultural chemical industry, including highly volatile input costs and fluctuations of demand for its products due to weather conditions. In FY 2008, Scotts has seen an increase of $21 million in raw material costs due to a global rise of prices since FY 2007. Scotts has also seen a decrease in revenue during times of unfavorable weather conditions such as extreme rainfall or droughts. [5]
Business OverviewScotts is best known for its product Miracle-Gro, a brand of lawn fertilizer found all over the continental United States. They offer a range of products in the lawn and garden industry, including fertilizers, weed controllers, grass seeds, and other such items.
Business and Financial MetricsScotts experienced a revenue growth of 3.8% to $2.98bn in FY 2008. Operating income decreased significantly to $98 million from $277.1 million in FY 2008. Net income also declined by $124.3 million during the same time span. The decrease in net income was due to impairment charges, recall matters, adverse weather conditions in March, and the rising prices of commodities. Similarly, the decrease in operating income was due to impairment charges, recall matters,and product registration. [7]
Scotts saw its revenue grow 6.7% in FY 2007. Revenue in FY 2007 amounted to $2.87bn, up from $2.69bn the year before. Although operating income has increased by $24.6 million in FY 2007 from FY 2006, net income has decreased by $19.3 million during that same time span. The decrease in net income was attributed to poor weather conditions in FY 2007 along with costs due to refinancing, increased levels of debt, higher effective tax rate and an increase of the average interest rate. [8] In FY 2007, approximately 70% of its revenue came from North America.[9]
Scotts has two major advantages in the North American market. The first is a strong, well-known brand image. Scotts invests 5% of its yearly revenues on advertising, a large amount when compared with its competitors, making it prominent in the mind of consumers. During the periods of FY 2006 and FY 20007, Scotts increased its advertising expense by $13.6 million. The second is its relationship with leading retailers. In FY 2007, most (60%) of its sales came from 3 sources: Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) (15%), Home Depot (HD) (29%), and Lowe's(16%). [10]
In recent years Scotts has begun to diversify its income base and transform the company into an all-around outdoor living provider through strategic acquisitions. Since 2001, they have invested $125 million in acquiring local lawn care businesses to create Scotts LawnService, which provides on-site lawn care for consumers. In 2005, they acquired Smith & Hawken for $68.5 (Million), an outdoor goods retailer known for high quality furniture. [11] And in 2006, they acquired Gutwein & Co. Inc. for $77 (Million), a producer of bird feed. [12]
Business SegmentsThe company's revenues are broken down into 4 main segments:
| Net Sales by Segment (millions) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| North America | $1988.3 | $1914.5 | $1668.1 |
| Scotts LawnService | 230.5 | 205.7 | 159.8 |
| International | 469.8 | 408.5 | 430.3 |
| Corporate & Other | 184.0 | 169.2 | 159.6 |
| Segment Total | 2871.8 | 2697.1 | 2369.3 |
Key Trends and Forces
Business Hurt by Rising Raw Material PricesScotts has been affected by the global rise in raw material prices. Overall Scotts has seen an increase of raw materials costs of $21 (Million) from FY 2007 to FY 2008. [20]The price of urea, a key component in fertilizers, has risen over 60% from 2007 to 2Q08.[21] The price spiked an additional 20% when China enacted a 135% export tariff on fertilizer products. [22] The price of diesel, another key component, has also risen 12%. [23] Rising oil prices also put pressure on consumer spending, curbing their appetite for goods such as lawn care products. The increases in raw material prices are putting a serious dent in Scotts bottom line, as the costs of goods sold skyrocket while pricing remains stable.[24]
SMG Exposed to Weather FluctuationsSince the company specializes in lawn care products, seasonality has a dramatic impact on revenues. Generally, 70-75% of sales occur during Q2 and Q3.[25] For example in FY 2008, SMG generated combined revenues of $2128.9 (Millions) in the second and third quarters. On the other hand, SMG only produced $852.2 (Millions) in its first and fourth quarters. [26]The timing of Scotts' product lineup is relatively undiversified, meaning any sort of seasonal disruptions can cause harm to revenues. The huge effects of seasonality were seen in 2008, when an unusually wet and cold April caused sluggish sales in the important second quarter. [27] Compared to 2Q2007, SMG generated $35.3 (Millions) less in 2Q2008. [28] These problems were exacerbated by extreme heat and droughts in the summer, which discourage purchasing of lawn care products. As evidence, when compared with revenues in 3Q2007, SMG generated $72.5 (Millions) less in 3Q2008. [29] Any sort of severe weather conditions, such as prolonged drought, have serious potential to damage Scotts' revenues.
Environmental Regulations and Legal IssuesIn March, Scotts had to recall four products due to labeling issues and non-declaration with the EPA. The recalls associated with this legal trouble cost Scotts approximately $31million. [30] The company withdrew its Miracle-Gro Shake 'n Feed Plus Weed Preventer and Scotts Bonus S MAX, as well as Scotts TurfBuilder MAX and a product mostly used by its LawnService business.[31] Adding to its woes, the company admitted to having "certain discrepancies in its registration records with respect to several additional products in June. [32] While the recall had a negligible impact on the revenue of the company (almost $2bn in FY 2007), these recalls have the potential to cause serious damage to Scotts' critical brand image.
CompetitionScotts three main competitors are:
The table below compares some of the top-level product offerings of Scotts Company and its main competitors.
| Revenue ($M) | Net Income($M) | |||||
| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | |
| Scotts Company[33] | 2,369.3 | 2,697.1 | 2,871.8 | 100.6 | 132.7 | 113.4 |
| Spectrum Brands[34] | 1,762.2 | 1,894.7 | 1,994.5 | 46.8 | (-434.0) | (-596.7) |
| Bayer(CropScience only)[35] | €5,896 | €5,700 | €5,826 | €690 | €898 | €1,040 |
| Central Garden & Pet Company[36] | 1,380.6 | 1,621.5 | 1,671.1 | 53.79 | 65.53 | 32.30 |
References



| ||||||
